Colin J.L. McCartney
MBChB PhD FCARCSI FRCA FRCPC
Professor and Chair of Anaesthesia
University of Ottawa
Head of Anaesthesia
The Ottawa Hospital
Scientist,
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Defining the Outcomes That
Matter for Perioperative Pain
Medicine
Conflicts of Interest
 None
Overview
 Important outcomes/who defines?
 USA, Canada, UK
 How can acute pain medicine influence
value based on the IHI triple aim?
Overview
 Important outcomes/who defines?
 USA, Canada, UK
 How can acute pain medicine influence
value based on the IHI triple aim?
Important outcomes:
who gets to define?
 Patient: Board of governors, Patient
advocates, Research: patient oriented
 Provider/Physician: Private model driven
by quality, patient experience and
efficiency
 Government: More and more involved
through incentive driven outcomes e.g.
CQUINS (UK), QBPs (Ontario) and CMS
(US)
Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Triple Aim in Healthcare
USA
 Centre for Medicaid and Medicare Services
(CMS)
 Best Care at Lower Cost 2012
 Performance transparency between
providers and consumers
 Set % of withhold of payments based on
performance related payments
 Currently 1.25% and will be 2% by 2017
Elements of Value-Based Purchasing
Patient Experience of Care
 HCAHPS
 32 questions
 Publicly reported 4 times per year
 7 questions that directly or indirectly
relate to pain
 Acute pain medicine needed for many
reasons!
www.edmariano.com
HCAHPS: Hospital Consumer Assessment of
Healthcare Providers and Systems
Quality-Based Procedures and Cost-Per
Weighted Case (Ontario)
 Ontario: 13.5 million people
 OHIP covers all medical care (tax-based
system)
 Quality-based procedures being
standardized based on best evidence
 Hospitals measured on case cost (per
weighting) and funded/penalized based on
costs
Quality Based Procedures
(QBP)
 ‘Price x Volume’ approach
 Funding allocated to procedures targeting
areas demonstrating opportunity to:
– introduce evidence into clinical pathways
– reduce practice variation
– attain cost efficiencies
– catalyze alignment of quality and funding.
How are guidelines developed?
 Expert consensus
 Health Quality Ontario
 Hip fracture/Hip and knee arthroplasty
 Try as much as possible to use evidence
from the literature
 Often evidence poor or not present
 Underlines importance of research in our
specialty
 382,000 patients
 25% neuraxial
 Neuraxial associated with less mortality,
length of stay, in-patient morbidity
Anesthesiology 2013
 Reduced postoperative pain, opioid
consumption, adverse effects
 No difference in blood loss or TE events
 No difference in mortality
Strengths/Limitations of QBPs
 Strengths: first attempt to standardize
practice across Ontario, Drives KT process,
Drives further research
 Weaknesses: based on limited evidence,
opinion-based, limited input from patient
experience of care, most funding remains
based on geography/population base
Commissioning for Quality and
Innovation Payments (CQUINS) UK
 Targets/Drivers for which hospitals can
obtain extra revenue
 Goal-directed therapy for major abdominal
surgery
 Time to surgery for hip fracture
 Dr. Foster-independent organization
measures and publishes outcome data
across centres in England
CQUINS for 2014/15
Important outcomes:
what are they?
 Patient: pain, function, awareness, nausea
 Physician: Quality and safety. Efficiency
 Hospital: Patient experience, Q+S,
Efficiency
 Society: Quality and safety, Patient
experience, Efficiency
What is patient experience?
 “a national study revealed that patients who
reported being most satisfied with their doctors
actually had higher healthcare and prescription
costs and were more likely to be hospitalized
than patients who were not as satisfied. Worse,
the most satisfied patients were significantly
more likely to die in the next four years”
http://www.theatlantic.com
Patient Experience vs Satisfaction
 Patient experience goes beyond patient
satisfaction and making patients happy
 You may have a negative outcome but a positive
experience
 You may have a positive outcome but a negative
experience
 Patient experience is linked to staff engagement
 Patients judge healthcare providers not only on
outcome but on compassionate and excellent
patient care
Overview
 Important outcomes/who defines?
 USA, Canada, UK
 How can acute pain medicine influence
value based on the IHI triple aim?
How can acute pain medicine
influence value
 Triple aim: Quality, Health of populations
and Cost
 Reduce pain: both acute and chronic
 Reduces AEs related to opioid sparing
 Reduction in cost: reduced overtime, case
cancellations, earlier discharge
 Facilitate early rehabilitation
Health Services Research 2009
HSR 2009
What about regional
anesthesia?
Regional Anesthesia
Reduces Pain
Anesthesia & Analgesia 2012
Regional Anesthesia and Impact
on Perioperative Medicine
Memtsoudis SG RAPM 2013
RA and short term outcomes
 Reduced pain
 Reduced nausea
 Faster discharge
 Faster return of GI function
 Improved rehabilitation
 Reduced respiratory complications
 Reduced MI and CVS complications
 etc etc
How can regional anesthesia
influence value
 Increased efficiency: block room model,
enhanced recovery, discharge, ambulatory
care
 Reduced readmission: better pain control
 Population Health: reduced mortality and
possible effects on other outcomes
 Overall lack of evidence with majority of
studies in colorectal surgery
 Value-based outcomes (IHI related) were
rarely reported
 Improved pain control, reduced adverse
events, faster mobility and enhanced
return of bowel function with RA
McIsaac D, Cole E, McCartney CJ BJA In Press
Defining Value in Acute Pain Medicine
Improved pain control
Less adverse effects
Mortality and Morbidity Benefits
Greater Efficiency, Faster discharge,
Reduced readmission
Overview
 Important outcomes/who defines?
 USA, Canada, UK
 How can acute pain medicine influence
value based on the IHI triple aim?
The Future
 Greater involvement of patients and government
in determining healthcare funding allocation
 Funding based on quality, effectiveness and
value
 Individual provider and hospital metrics to look
at our own measures of quality (e.g. NSQIP)
 Standardization of care to allow easier
measurement of outcomes (e.g. QBPs)
 Movement of care back to the community
The Future
 Better research across large numbers of patients
examining value-based outcomes
 Get engaged in building the research base
 Apply current evidence in practice
 Use regional anesthesia but manage adverse
effects such as motor block
 In this era of “Value-Based Medicine” make sure
we don’t decline to “Cost-Based Medicine”
 Don’t confuse patient experience with patient
satisfaction
Further reading:
 ACS Physician quality reporting system:
https://www.facs.org/advocacy/regulatory/pqrs
 Pay for Performance in periop pain:
http://www.edmariano.com/archives/684
 Triple aim:
http://www.ihi.org/Engage/Initiatives/TripleAim/
pages/default.aspx
 Dr. Foster: http://www.drfoster.com/about-us/

Defining the Outcomes that Matter for Perioperative Pain Medicine

  • 1.
    Colin J.L. McCartney MBChBPhD FCARCSI FRCA FRCPC Professor and Chair of Anaesthesia University of Ottawa Head of Anaesthesia The Ottawa Hospital Scientist, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Defining the Outcomes That Matter for Perioperative Pain Medicine
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Overview  Important outcomes/whodefines?  USA, Canada, UK  How can acute pain medicine influence value based on the IHI triple aim?
  • 4.
    Overview  Important outcomes/whodefines?  USA, Canada, UK  How can acute pain medicine influence value based on the IHI triple aim?
  • 5.
    Important outcomes: who getsto define?  Patient: Board of governors, Patient advocates, Research: patient oriented  Provider/Physician: Private model driven by quality, patient experience and efficiency  Government: More and more involved through incentive driven outcomes e.g. CQUINS (UK), QBPs (Ontario) and CMS (US)
  • 6.
    Institute for HealthcareImprovement Triple Aim in Healthcare
  • 7.
    USA  Centre forMedicaid and Medicare Services (CMS)  Best Care at Lower Cost 2012  Performance transparency between providers and consumers  Set % of withhold of payments based on performance related payments  Currently 1.25% and will be 2% by 2017
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Patient Experience ofCare  HCAHPS  32 questions  Publicly reported 4 times per year  7 questions that directly or indirectly relate to pain  Acute pain medicine needed for many reasons! www.edmariano.com HCAHPS: Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems
  • 10.
    Quality-Based Procedures andCost-Per Weighted Case (Ontario)  Ontario: 13.5 million people  OHIP covers all medical care (tax-based system)  Quality-based procedures being standardized based on best evidence  Hospitals measured on case cost (per weighting) and funded/penalized based on costs
  • 11.
    Quality Based Procedures (QBP) ‘Price x Volume’ approach  Funding allocated to procedures targeting areas demonstrating opportunity to: – introduce evidence into clinical pathways – reduce practice variation – attain cost efficiencies – catalyze alignment of quality and funding.
  • 13.
    How are guidelinesdeveloped?  Expert consensus  Health Quality Ontario  Hip fracture/Hip and knee arthroplasty  Try as much as possible to use evidence from the literature  Often evidence poor or not present  Underlines importance of research in our specialty
  • 16.
     382,000 patients 25% neuraxial  Neuraxial associated with less mortality, length of stay, in-patient morbidity Anesthesiology 2013
  • 17.
     Reduced postoperativepain, opioid consumption, adverse effects  No difference in blood loss or TE events  No difference in mortality
  • 19.
    Strengths/Limitations of QBPs Strengths: first attempt to standardize practice across Ontario, Drives KT process, Drives further research  Weaknesses: based on limited evidence, opinion-based, limited input from patient experience of care, most funding remains based on geography/population base
  • 20.
    Commissioning for Qualityand Innovation Payments (CQUINS) UK  Targets/Drivers for which hospitals can obtain extra revenue  Goal-directed therapy for major abdominal surgery  Time to surgery for hip fracture  Dr. Foster-independent organization measures and publishes outcome data across centres in England
  • 21.
  • 22.
    Important outcomes: what arethey?  Patient: pain, function, awareness, nausea  Physician: Quality and safety. Efficiency  Hospital: Patient experience, Q+S, Efficiency  Society: Quality and safety, Patient experience, Efficiency
  • 23.
    What is patientexperience?
  • 24.
     “a nationalstudy revealed that patients who reported being most satisfied with their doctors actually had higher healthcare and prescription costs and were more likely to be hospitalized than patients who were not as satisfied. Worse, the most satisfied patients were significantly more likely to die in the next four years” http://www.theatlantic.com
  • 25.
    Patient Experience vsSatisfaction  Patient experience goes beyond patient satisfaction and making patients happy  You may have a negative outcome but a positive experience  You may have a positive outcome but a negative experience  Patient experience is linked to staff engagement  Patients judge healthcare providers not only on outcome but on compassionate and excellent patient care
  • 27.
    Overview  Important outcomes/whodefines?  USA, Canada, UK  How can acute pain medicine influence value based on the IHI triple aim?
  • 28.
    How can acutepain medicine influence value  Triple aim: Quality, Health of populations and Cost  Reduce pain: both acute and chronic  Reduces AEs related to opioid sparing  Reduction in cost: reduced overtime, case cancellations, earlier discharge  Facilitate early rehabilitation
  • 29.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
    Regional Anesthesia andImpact on Perioperative Medicine
  • 35.
  • 36.
    RA and shortterm outcomes  Reduced pain  Reduced nausea  Faster discharge  Faster return of GI function  Improved rehabilitation  Reduced respiratory complications  Reduced MI and CVS complications  etc etc
  • 37.
    How can regionalanesthesia influence value  Increased efficiency: block room model, enhanced recovery, discharge, ambulatory care  Reduced readmission: better pain control  Population Health: reduced mortality and possible effects on other outcomes
  • 38.
     Overall lackof evidence with majority of studies in colorectal surgery  Value-based outcomes (IHI related) were rarely reported  Improved pain control, reduced adverse events, faster mobility and enhanced return of bowel function with RA McIsaac D, Cole E, McCartney CJ BJA In Press
  • 40.
    Defining Value inAcute Pain Medicine Improved pain control Less adverse effects Mortality and Morbidity Benefits Greater Efficiency, Faster discharge, Reduced readmission
  • 41.
    Overview  Important outcomes/whodefines?  USA, Canada, UK  How can acute pain medicine influence value based on the IHI triple aim?
  • 42.
    The Future  Greaterinvolvement of patients and government in determining healthcare funding allocation  Funding based on quality, effectiveness and value  Individual provider and hospital metrics to look at our own measures of quality (e.g. NSQIP)  Standardization of care to allow easier measurement of outcomes (e.g. QBPs)  Movement of care back to the community
  • 43.
    The Future  Betterresearch across large numbers of patients examining value-based outcomes  Get engaged in building the research base  Apply current evidence in practice  Use regional anesthesia but manage adverse effects such as motor block  In this era of “Value-Based Medicine” make sure we don’t decline to “Cost-Based Medicine”  Don’t confuse patient experience with patient satisfaction
  • 44.
    Further reading:  ACSPhysician quality reporting system: https://www.facs.org/advocacy/regulatory/pqrs  Pay for Performance in periop pain: http://www.edmariano.com/archives/684  Triple aim: http://www.ihi.org/Engage/Initiatives/TripleAim/ pages/default.aspx  Dr. Foster: http://www.drfoster.com/about-us/