FEA stress analysis
defect in a Molded Plastic part
Solidworks Simulation
8/25/2016
Don Blanchet
3B Associates
dwb3298@verizon.net
Model from
Grabcad
CAUTION
 Don’t assume that a defect will always
result in a part failure at the location
of the defect.
 Engineering experience and
judgement can mislead.
 Complex parts often have complex
load paths.
PROBLEM
 A high volume molded plastic part
underwent post NC machining which
introduced a defect due to an error.
 What impact does this false cut have on
the strength and factor of safety in the
part.
 Worst case Static Loading was specified
by the customer.
Model
ABS plastic
1.55 inch dia
Model with defect
NC false cut
Manufacturing engineering “part will be o.k. – ship 5,000 parts”
Boundary Conditions
Fixed base
Worst case static
Loads
+ Fy = 25lbs
- Fz = 20lbs
FEA adaptive mesh
Stress results original design
Max VonMises stress = 3,000 psi
Elastic deformation
Stress results flawed part
VonMises stress = 2,000 psi
In flaw
Stress results flawed part
Max VonMises stress = 6,000 psi
Same location as original part
Permanent plastic deformation here
Results
Analysis
case
Maximum
Stress
psi
Factor of Safety
Tensile
strength =
4500 psi
Original 3,000 1.5
With NC
Manufacturing
flaw
6,000 0.75
failure
Conclusion
 There is a significant risk in shipment
of the defective parts.
 The potential failure location is not at
the defect. (surprise ! ??)
 FEA could save the company
embarrassment time and money.
Postscript
 I started structural analysis in 1967
right out of undergrad school with the
help of a slide rule and great mentors.
 I was lucky enough to be among the
earliest adopters of the finite element
method.
 It continues to please and amaze.

Defect analysis in molded plastic part

  • 1.
    FEA stress analysis defectin a Molded Plastic part Solidworks Simulation 8/25/2016 Don Blanchet 3B Associates dwb3298@verizon.net Model from Grabcad
  • 2.
    CAUTION  Don’t assumethat a defect will always result in a part failure at the location of the defect.  Engineering experience and judgement can mislead.  Complex parts often have complex load paths.
  • 3.
    PROBLEM  A highvolume molded plastic part underwent post NC machining which introduced a defect due to an error.  What impact does this false cut have on the strength and factor of safety in the part.  Worst case Static Loading was specified by the customer.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Model with defect NCfalse cut Manufacturing engineering “part will be o.k. – ship 5,000 parts”
  • 6.
    Boundary Conditions Fixed base Worstcase static Loads + Fy = 25lbs - Fz = 20lbs
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Stress results originaldesign Max VonMises stress = 3,000 psi Elastic deformation
  • 9.
    Stress results flawedpart VonMises stress = 2,000 psi In flaw
  • 10.
    Stress results flawedpart Max VonMises stress = 6,000 psi Same location as original part Permanent plastic deformation here
  • 11.
    Results Analysis case Maximum Stress psi Factor of Safety Tensile strength= 4500 psi Original 3,000 1.5 With NC Manufacturing flaw 6,000 0.75 failure
  • 12.
    Conclusion  There isa significant risk in shipment of the defective parts.  The potential failure location is not at the defect. (surprise ! ??)  FEA could save the company embarrassment time and money.
  • 13.
    Postscript  I startedstructural analysis in 1967 right out of undergrad school with the help of a slide rule and great mentors.  I was lucky enough to be among the earliest adopters of the finite element method.  It continues to please and amaze.