The document discusses the death penalty, including its history, regulation under international law, and regulation in Indonesia. It traces the development of the death penalty from ancient times through modern eras. While the right to life is considered non-derogable, international law allows for the death penalty under certain conditions. In Indonesia, the death penalty is regulated by criminal code and laws, and applies to offenses such as narcotics, murder, and terrorism. The document also examines current debates around abolishing the death penalty and presents a case study of its application in Indonesia.

1. Death Penalty
Ardya Syafhana
M.Oscar Dharma
M.Ichtiawan Dani
M.Rafi Romdoni
Sofia Yuniardii

2. CONTENT
 Background
 History
 Regulation in international LAW
 Regulation In indonesia
 Current issues
 Conclusion

3. BACKGROUND
How is the development
of death penalty ?
How is the existence of
death penalty in
indonesia ?
How is the existence of
death penalty in
international law ?

4. Indonesia
JJ.
Rosseau
A.Cesare
Beccaria
Developoment of death
penalty from time to time
Death penalty has been known since long time
ago. It has been known since the era of Moses law
(Mozaische Wergeving), and also during the Greek,
Roman, Germany, and Canonic era During the era
of Roman imperium, the practice of the death
penalty at the time was so violent, with the
purpose of slowing or stopping the spreading of
Christianity, and also to give amusement for the
citizen of Rome at the time. However, during the
era of Constitutio Criminalis Carolina in XVII and
XVIII century, the practice of death penalty was
limited and the level of violence was also reduced

5. LEGAL BASIS OF DEATH PENALTY
INDONESIAN PERSPECTIVES
Criminal Code
 Pasal104 (makar terhadap presiden dan wakil presiden) 2.
 Pasal 111 ayat 2 (membujuk negara asing untuk bermusuhan
atau berperang, jika permusuhan itu dilakukan atau jadi
perang)
 Pasal 124 ayat 3 (membantu musuh waktu perang)
 Pasal 140 aY3t 3 (makar terhadap raja atau kepala negara-
negara sahabat yang direncanakan dan berakibat maut)
 5. Pasal 340 (pembunuhan berencana)
 Pasal 365 ayat 4 (pencurian dengan kekerasan yang
mengakibatkan luka berat atau mati)
 Pasal 368 ayat 2 (pemerasan dengan kekerasan yang
mengakibatkan luka berat atau mati)
 Pasal444 (pembajakan di laut, pesisirdan sungai yang
mengakibatkan kematian).
UNDANG-UNDANG
 Pasal 2 Undang-Undang No.5 (PNPS) Tahun 1959 tentang
wewenang Jaksa Agung/Jaksa Tentara Agung dan tentang
memperberat ancaman hukuman terhadap tindak pidana
yang membahayakan pelaksanaan perlengkapan sandang
pangan.
 Pasal 2 Undang-Undang No. 21 (Prp) Tahun 1959 tentang
memperberat ancaman hukuman terhadap tindak pidana
ekonomi.
 Pasal 1 ayat 1 Undang-Undang Darurat No. 12 tahun
1951 tentang senjata api, amunisi atau sesuatu bahan
peledak.
 Pasal13 Undang-Undang No. 11 (PNPS) Tahun 1963
tentang pemberantasan kegiatan subversi.
 Pasal 23 Undang-Undang no. 31 T ahun 1964 tentang
ketentuan pokok tenaga atom.
 Pasal 36 ayat 4 sub b Undang-Undang no. 9 tahun 1976
tentang Narkotika
 Undang-Undang No.4 Tahun 1976 tentang kejahatan
penerbangan dan kejahatan terhadap sarana/prasarana

6. LEGAL BASIS OF DEATH PENALTY
INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVES
 ICCPR
In article 6 (2) ,(4),(5)
 UDHR
in article 3
 United Nations Charter
article 2(4)

7. Current Issues :
• pro abolition of death
penalty
• Contra Abolition of
Death Penalty

8. CASE OF FREDDY BUDIMAN
• 2009
• Freddy Budiman was
arrested as a
distributor of
narcotics. Freddy was
convicted with 3
years and 4 months
of imprisonment.
• 2013
• Freddy has already
imported narcotics
from China and
Netherlands
• The panel of judge
then gave the death
penalty to Freddy
• 2011
• Freddy confessed
that some of the
narcotics were given
to Bripka S, a Ciracas,
East Jakarta, resident
• Freddy was then
given 9 years
imprisonment.

9. CONCLUSION
 A death penalty is the sentence of execution for murder and some other capital crimes (serious
crimes, especially murder, which are punishable by death). The death penalty is carried out in
order to uphold justice in society
 Death penalty has been known since long time ago. It has been known since the era of Moses law
(Mozaische Wergeving), and also during the Greek, Roman, Germany, and Canonic era During the
era of Roman imperium, the practice of the death penalty at the time was so violent, with the
purpose of slowing or stopping the spreading of Christianity, and also to give amusement for the
citizen of Rome at the time. However, during the era of Constitutio Criminalis Carolina in XVII and
XVIII century, the practice of death penalty was limited and the level of violence was also reduced
 Even if it is recognized that rights to live classified as non-derogable rights but in article 6 (2), (4),
and (5) textually allows the implementation of death penalty. There is no prohibition of death
penalty under international law, however some international instruments are regulated the
limitation of the implementation of death penalty itself.
 In Indoesia becomes an alternative or reversible verdict,regulates in criminal code and Undang
undang.Mostly govern about narcotics, murder ,terorism.
• Cureent issues related pro and contra abolishing death penalty and case freddy budiman in
indonesia.

10. ANY QUESTION ?