Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction 5 to >4.0 pts
Advanced
The Introduction to the
essay is present and
includes a clear thesis
statement. The
Introduction begins with a
Level 1 heading.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
The Introduction
to the essay is
present and
includes a thesis
statement. The
Introduction
begins with a
Level 1 heading.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The Introduction
to the essay is
limited or
incomplete,
and/or A Level
1 heading is not
provided.
0 pts
Not Present
An Introduction is
not present.
5 pts
Biblical
Integration/Content
33 to >29.0 pts
Advanced
Integration of the Bible
with multiple course topics
is present throughout the
essay. A clear, logical flow
is present throughout the
essay. The points made
are fully developed.
Content is organized
under Level 1 headings.
29 to >27.0 pts
Proficient
Integration of the
Bible with
multiple course
topics is present
throughout most
of the essay. A
clear, logical flow
is present
throughout most
of the essay.
Content is
organized under
Level 1
headings.
27 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Integration of the
Bible with course
topics is
incomplete or
narrow in scope.
The major points
are not stated
clearly
throughout
essay. Content
is not organized
under Level 1
headings.
0 pts
Not Present
The Bible was not
integrated with
course topics in the
essay.
33 pts
Conclusion 5 to >4.0 pts
Advanced
The Conclusion is present
and reiterates the main
points of the essay. The
Conclusion begins with a
Level 1 heading.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
The Conclusion
is present and
partially
reiterates the
main points of
the essay. The
Conclusion
begins with a
Level 1 heading.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
A conclusion is
present, but
limited or
incomplete;
and/or no
heading is
provided.
0 pts
Not Present
A conclusion is not
present.
5 pts
Biblical Integration Essay Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B02_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Sources 10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
Cites and discusses
specific Scriptures
correctly throughout the
narrative to support the
arguments being made.
Cites and discusses the
course textbook correctly
throughout the narrative to
support the arguments
being made.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Cites and
discusses
Scriptures in the
narrative to
support the
arguments being
made. Cites and
discusses the
course textbook
in the narrative to
support the
arguments being
made.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Specific
Scriptures are
not cited or
clearly discussed
in the narrative;
and/or the
textbook is not
cited or clearly
discussed in the
narrative.
0 pts
Not Present
The arguments in
the paper are not
supported by
references/sources.
10 pts
Page Count 12 to >10.0 pts
Advanced
The essay is at least two
(2) complete pages of
original narrative, not
counting the title page,
reference page, and
quotations.
10 to >9.0 pts
Proficient
The paper is at
least 1.75
complete pages
of original
narrative, not
counting the title
page, reference
page, and
quotations.
9 to >0.0 ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. WhaBenitoSumpter862
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. WhaSantosConleyha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. what is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. whaSUKHI5
This document outlines criteria for evaluating a student paper on collaboration in the juvenile justice system. It discusses the importance of considering opposing viewpoints, logically deriving conclusions, and adhering to formatting standards like APA style. Key points that must be addressed include the meaning of collaboration, challenges collaborative efforts face, and how to support positions with evidence from assigned readings and a Christian worldview perspective.
Complete Chapter 4s End-of-Chapter Exercises (Links to an exter.docxmccormicknadine86
Complete Chapter 4's End-of-Chapter Exercises (Links to an external site.).
Prepare and submit in EXCEL (only) the following:
· Problems: Number #1, 2, 3 & 5. HINTS: #1 - Use Proper Journal Entry format. #2: The letter reference - a simple yes or no and if yes, how much. #3: Use proper Journal Entry format for your "YES" answers in #2. And for #5: List the item and then list next to if it normally has a DEBIT or CREDIT balance.
· As always - do not overthink; Accounting is about sorting, classifying and recording. Keep it simple.
Rubric
Individual Assignment (2)
Individual Assignment (2)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content & Organization (80%)
80 to >74.0 pts
Exemplary
• Student provides a thorough and detailed description of the questions. • Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). • Presents an insightful and thorough analysis. • Provides appropriate and powerful connections with concepts discussed course.
74 to >66.0 pts
Accomplishment
• Student provides a description with some details of the topic chosen of the questions. • Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). • Presents an effective analysis. • Provides appropriate connections with concepts discussed in the course.
66 to >58.0 pts
Partially Proficient
• Student provides a cursory or incomplete description of the questions. • Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). • Presents an incomplete analysis. • Provides little or no connection with concepts discussed in the course.
58 to >0 pts
Proficient
• Student provides a description with vague details of the topic of the questions. • Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). • Presents a superficial analysis. • Provides appropriate but somewhat vague connections with concepts discussed in the course.
80 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Readability & Style (10%)
10 to >9.0 pts
Exemplary
• Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow throughout the paper. • Tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. • Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. • Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied sentences.
9 to >8.0 pts
Accomplishment
• Paragraph transitions are present and maintain the flow throughout the paper. • Tone is mostly appropriate to the content and assignment. • Sentences are mostly complete and clear. • Sentences are constructed with consistently varied sentences.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
• Paragraph transitions are mostly present throughout the paper. • Tone is somewhat appropriate to the content and assignment. • Sentences are somewhat complete and clear. • Sentences are constructed with varied sentences.
6 to >0 pts
Partially Proficient
• Paragraph transitions are not present throughout the paper. • Tone is not appropriate to the content and assignment. • Sentences are not complete an ...
The document provides guidance on writing essays at level 7. It emphasizes the importance of structure and planning. It outlines the stages of good essay planning and writing, including analyzing the question, mapping out initial ideas, focused reading, developing themes and key points, and deciding on a conclusion. The document encourages detailed planning of paragraphs using the WEED method of outlining the topic, providing explanation and examples, and linking it back to the overarching question or argument. It also provides tips on writing strong introductions and conclusions through signposting the structure and key points.
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the te.docxcheryllwashburn
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Interview a person of your choice (they may be your parents, relatives, or friends). These questions must address the following:
Cognitive, physical, and psychosocial development during the interviewee's Maturity stage of adulthood (age 65 or older).
How peers influenced the interviewee during his or her lifetime.
What people and/or events influenced the interviewee's development of morals.
How the interviewee's experiences have formulated who he or she is as a Mature adult.
Note: American Psychological Association (APA) ethical guidelines indicate that interviewees have the right to refuse to answer any question posed to them by an interviewer. Please ensure that your interviewees are aware of this, and do not force them to answer where the opportunity to reply has been refused.
Pick one of the theories reviewed in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Write a paper of 750-1,000 words, discussing the selected theory and how it relates to your interview. Include the following in your paper:
A description of the selected theory.
A description of your interviewee (gender, age, ethnicity, etc.)
How the interviewee's responses illustrate the selected theory. Support your response with examples.
Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the text in your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
THERE NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 4 SCHOLARY RESOURCES USED IN THIS ASSIGNMENT. THE PAPER NEEDS TO BE WRITTEN IN APA FORMAT.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Selected Theory
Does not include a description of the selected theory.
Includes an inaccurate or vague description of the selected theory.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by included an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance to the topic.
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the selected theory by providing an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance on the topic.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by including a detailed and accurate description of the theory as well as major points of importance to the topic and clearly ties the information provided to the practice of professional counseling.
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Interviewee (Gender, Age, Ethnicity, etc.)
Does not include a description of the interviewee and/or the person interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment.
A minimal description of the interviewed was included and/or the person interviewed was minimally appropriate for the assignmen.
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric CriteriaLevels of.docxverad6
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Introduction
(10 pints)
10 to 9 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction provide a clear overview of the paper’s contents.
8 to 7 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction provides an overview of the paper’s contents.
6 to 1 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction seems to provide an overview of the paper’s contents.
0 point
Does not state the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction does not provide an overview of the paper’s contents.
Analysis
(50 pints)
50 to 45 points
The issues raised in the topic are properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author provides personal inputs
44 to 35points
The issues raised in the topic are not properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author provides personal inputs.
34 to 1 points
The issues raised in the topic are not properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author does not provide personal inputs.
0 point
The author does not provide any analysis.
Conclusion
(10 pints)
10 to 9 points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper and does offer suggestions for future study
8 to 7points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper, but does not offer any suggestions for future study
6 to 1 points
The conclusion offers a brief summary of issues treated in the paper, but does not offer any suggestions for future study
0 point
There is no conclusion
Structure
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Headings and transitions
(10 points)
10 to 9 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are clear. Proper headings are used.
8 to 7 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are clear. Proper headings are not used.
6 to 1 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are not clear. Proper headings are not used.
0 point
No transitions between paragraphs and sections. Headings are not used.
Spelling and grammar
(10 points)
10 to 9 points
There are no more than three spelling or grammar errors.
8 to 7 points
There are four or five spelling or grammar errors.
6 to 1 points
There are six or seven spelling or grammar errors.
0 point
There are eight or more spelling or grammar errors.
Bibliography and APA style
(10 point)
10 to 9 points
The bibliography contains at least 3 scholarly sources. The paper is in current APA style.
8 to 7 points
The bibliography contains less than 3 scholarly sources. The paper is in current APA style.
6 to 1 points
The bibliography contains less than 3 scholarly sources. The paper is not in current APA style.
0 point
The bibliography does not contain any scholarly sources. The paper is not in current APA style.
.
ENGL 101
Essay 1: Narrative Argument Grading Rubric
Essential Requirements for Grading:
The next two columns refer to the deviation scores squared, since summing up deviation scores always equals zero and is of no use when determining variance.
Again, can you complete the cells for the last two employees?
Finally, the last column refers to the product of multiplying the deviation of X by the deviation of Y shown here as xy. Again, fill in the last two rows to check your understanding.
Now we are ready to calculate our correlation, r.
The following general categories indicate a quick way of interpreting a calculated r value (+ or –):
· 0.0 to 0.2: very weak to negligible correlation
· 0.2 to 0.4: weak, low correlation (not very significant)
· 0.4 to 0.7: moderate correlation
· 0.7 to 0.9: strong, high correlation
· 0.9 to 1.0: very strong correlation
Using the above guide the consulting psychologist would advise the human resource manager to conclude there is a weak relationship between years of employment and pay raises, and that the relationship is positive.
Caution must be exercised at this juncture as the relationship determined cannot as of yet be considered statistically significant.
Knowing that the situation included 10 individuals (N = 10: number of participants and degrees of freedom equal N – 2: two variables) to determine whether the results are statistically significant one must go to a "r" value table and determine what value is needed for statistical significance. In this case where the degrees of freedom are 8 (N – 2), the required r value at the probability level of 0.05 is +/- 0.549. The obtained r value in this case of + 0.36 is less than the required r value; therefore, the relationship is not statistically significant at the 0.05 probability level. Further, the consulting psychologist can conclude as well that the null hypothesis is accepted, and the relationship was most likely due to chance factors.
The same data cited above can be placed in the raw score formula, and the exact same r value will result. Note: Should an r value exceed +/– 1.0, the conclusion drawn is simply that a mathematical mistake has been made in the calculation process.
Post a behavioral research situation that could use a Pearson coefficient research study and a chi square research study. Present the rationale for each selection. Be very specific in your presentation.
Format in APA style. 2 pages
Writing Components:
Organization: Introduction, Thesis, Transitions, Conclusion
Usage and Mechanics: Grammar, Spelling, Sentence structure
APA Elements: Attribution, Paraphrasing, Quotations
Style: Audience, Word Choice
100
Total 100
EDUCATION
2
Education: What does it mean to be Well-educated?
Thesis statement
To be well-educated means to attain the highest level of education for that individual
.
Abstrac ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. WhaBenitoSumpter862
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. WhaSantosConleyha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. what is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. whaSUKHI5
This document outlines criteria for evaluating a student paper on collaboration in the juvenile justice system. It discusses the importance of considering opposing viewpoints, logically deriving conclusions, and adhering to formatting standards like APA style. Key points that must be addressed include the meaning of collaboration, challenges collaborative efforts face, and how to support positions with evidence from assigned readings and a Christian worldview perspective.
Complete Chapter 4s End-of-Chapter Exercises (Links to an exter.docxmccormicknadine86
Complete Chapter 4's End-of-Chapter Exercises (Links to an external site.).
Prepare and submit in EXCEL (only) the following:
· Problems: Number #1, 2, 3 & 5. HINTS: #1 - Use Proper Journal Entry format. #2: The letter reference - a simple yes or no and if yes, how much. #3: Use proper Journal Entry format for your "YES" answers in #2. And for #5: List the item and then list next to if it normally has a DEBIT or CREDIT balance.
· As always - do not overthink; Accounting is about sorting, classifying and recording. Keep it simple.
Rubric
Individual Assignment (2)
Individual Assignment (2)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content & Organization (80%)
80 to >74.0 pts
Exemplary
• Student provides a thorough and detailed description of the questions. • Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). • Presents an insightful and thorough analysis. • Provides appropriate and powerful connections with concepts discussed course.
74 to >66.0 pts
Accomplishment
• Student provides a description with some details of the topic chosen of the questions. • Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). • Presents an effective analysis. • Provides appropriate connections with concepts discussed in the course.
66 to >58.0 pts
Partially Proficient
• Student provides a cursory or incomplete description of the questions. • Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). • Presents an incomplete analysis. • Provides little or no connection with concepts discussed in the course.
58 to >0 pts
Proficient
• Student provides a description with vague details of the topic of the questions. • Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). • Presents a superficial analysis. • Provides appropriate but somewhat vague connections with concepts discussed in the course.
80 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Readability & Style (10%)
10 to >9.0 pts
Exemplary
• Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow throughout the paper. • Tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. • Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. • Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied sentences.
9 to >8.0 pts
Accomplishment
• Paragraph transitions are present and maintain the flow throughout the paper. • Tone is mostly appropriate to the content and assignment. • Sentences are mostly complete and clear. • Sentences are constructed with consistently varied sentences.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
• Paragraph transitions are mostly present throughout the paper. • Tone is somewhat appropriate to the content and assignment. • Sentences are somewhat complete and clear. • Sentences are constructed with varied sentences.
6 to >0 pts
Partially Proficient
• Paragraph transitions are not present throughout the paper. • Tone is not appropriate to the content and assignment. • Sentences are not complete an ...
The document provides guidance on writing essays at level 7. It emphasizes the importance of structure and planning. It outlines the stages of good essay planning and writing, including analyzing the question, mapping out initial ideas, focused reading, developing themes and key points, and deciding on a conclusion. The document encourages detailed planning of paragraphs using the WEED method of outlining the topic, providing explanation and examples, and linking it back to the overarching question or argument. It also provides tips on writing strong introductions and conclusions through signposting the structure and key points.
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the te.docxcheryllwashburn
Review the various theories of Aging in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Interview a person of your choice (they may be your parents, relatives, or friends). These questions must address the following:
Cognitive, physical, and psychosocial development during the interviewee's Maturity stage of adulthood (age 65 or older).
How peers influenced the interviewee during his or her lifetime.
What people and/or events influenced the interviewee's development of morals.
How the interviewee's experiences have formulated who he or she is as a Mature adult.
Note: American Psychological Association (APA) ethical guidelines indicate that interviewees have the right to refuse to answer any question posed to them by an interviewer. Please ensure that your interviewees are aware of this, and do not force them to answer where the opportunity to reply has been refused.
Pick one of the theories reviewed in Chapters 14 and 15 of the text.
Write a paper of 750-1,000 words, discussing the selected theory and how it relates to your interview. Include the following in your paper:
A description of the selected theory.
A description of your interviewee (gender, age, ethnicity, etc.)
How the interviewee's responses illustrate the selected theory. Support your response with examples.
Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the text in your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
THERE NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST 4 SCHOLARY RESOURCES USED IN THIS ASSIGNMENT. THE PAPER NEEDS TO BE WRITTEN IN APA FORMAT.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Selected Theory
Does not include a description of the selected theory.
Includes an inaccurate or vague description of the selected theory.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by included an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance to the topic.
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the selected theory by providing an accurate description of the theory that includes major points of importance on the topic.
Demonstrates an understanding of the selected theory by including a detailed and accurate description of the theory as well as major points of importance to the topic and clearly ties the information provided to the practice of professional counseling.
80.0 %Content
15.0 %A Description of the Interviewee (Gender, Age, Ethnicity, etc.)
Does not include a description of the interviewee and/or the person interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment.
A minimal description of the interviewed was included and/or the person interviewed was minimally appropriate for the assignmen.
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric CriteriaLevels of.docxverad6
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Introduction
(10 pints)
10 to 9 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction provide a clear overview of the paper’s contents.
8 to 7 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction provides an overview of the paper’s contents.
6 to 1 points
State the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction seems to provide an overview of the paper’s contents.
0 point
Does not state the topic the author is going to address.
The introduction does not provide an overview of the paper’s contents.
Analysis
(50 pints)
50 to 45 points
The issues raised in the topic are properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author provides personal inputs
44 to 35points
The issues raised in the topic are not properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author provides personal inputs.
34 to 1 points
The issues raised in the topic are not properly treated. Different viewpoints have been considered, analyzed, and treated. The author does not provide personal inputs.
0 point
The author does not provide any analysis.
Conclusion
(10 pints)
10 to 9 points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper and does offer suggestions for future study
8 to 7points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper, but does not offer any suggestions for future study
6 to 1 points
The conclusion offers a brief summary of issues treated in the paper, but does not offer any suggestions for future study
0 point
There is no conclusion
Structure
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Headings and transitions
(10 points)
10 to 9 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are clear. Proper headings are used.
8 to 7 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are clear. Proper headings are not used.
6 to 1 points
The transitions between paragraphs and sections are not clear. Proper headings are not used.
0 point
No transitions between paragraphs and sections. Headings are not used.
Spelling and grammar
(10 points)
10 to 9 points
There are no more than three spelling or grammar errors.
8 to 7 points
There are four or five spelling or grammar errors.
6 to 1 points
There are six or seven spelling or grammar errors.
0 point
There are eight or more spelling or grammar errors.
Bibliography and APA style
(10 point)
10 to 9 points
The bibliography contains at least 3 scholarly sources. The paper is in current APA style.
8 to 7 points
The bibliography contains less than 3 scholarly sources. The paper is in current APA style.
6 to 1 points
The bibliography contains less than 3 scholarly sources. The paper is not in current APA style.
0 point
The bibliography does not contain any scholarly sources. The paper is not in current APA style.
.
ENGL 101
Essay 1: Narrative Argument Grading Rubric
Essential Requirements for Grading:
The next two columns refer to the deviation scores squared, since summing up deviation scores always equals zero and is of no use when determining variance.
Again, can you complete the cells for the last two employees?
Finally, the last column refers to the product of multiplying the deviation of X by the deviation of Y shown here as xy. Again, fill in the last two rows to check your understanding.
Now we are ready to calculate our correlation, r.
The following general categories indicate a quick way of interpreting a calculated r value (+ or –):
· 0.0 to 0.2: very weak to negligible correlation
· 0.2 to 0.4: weak, low correlation (not very significant)
· 0.4 to 0.7: moderate correlation
· 0.7 to 0.9: strong, high correlation
· 0.9 to 1.0: very strong correlation
Using the above guide the consulting psychologist would advise the human resource manager to conclude there is a weak relationship between years of employment and pay raises, and that the relationship is positive.
Caution must be exercised at this juncture as the relationship determined cannot as of yet be considered statistically significant.
Knowing that the situation included 10 individuals (N = 10: number of participants and degrees of freedom equal N – 2: two variables) to determine whether the results are statistically significant one must go to a "r" value table and determine what value is needed for statistical significance. In this case where the degrees of freedom are 8 (N – 2), the required r value at the probability level of 0.05 is +/- 0.549. The obtained r value in this case of + 0.36 is less than the required r value; therefore, the relationship is not statistically significant at the 0.05 probability level. Further, the consulting psychologist can conclude as well that the null hypothesis is accepted, and the relationship was most likely due to chance factors.
The same data cited above can be placed in the raw score formula, and the exact same r value will result. Note: Should an r value exceed +/– 1.0, the conclusion drawn is simply that a mathematical mistake has been made in the calculation process.
Post a behavioral research situation that could use a Pearson coefficient research study and a chi square research study. Present the rationale for each selection. Be very specific in your presentation.
Format in APA style. 2 pages
Writing Components:
Organization: Introduction, Thesis, Transitions, Conclusion
Usage and Mechanics: Grammar, Spelling, Sentence structure
APA Elements: Attribution, Paraphrasing, Quotations
Style: Audience, Word Choice
100
Total 100
EDUCATION
2
Education: What does it mean to be Well-educated?
Thesis statement
To be well-educated means to attain the highest level of education for that individual
.
Abstrac ...
Busi 330 Db 2 Grading RubricBased on 70-point maximumCriteria.docxjasoninnes20
Busi 330 Db 2 Grading Rubric
Based on 70-point maximum
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Marketing Strategies
13 to 14 points
All assignment components are thoughtfully and comprehensively detailed, reflecting collegiate level reasoning and support. Relevant examples or explanations render a clear understanding of the assignment principles.
10 to 12
Most of the components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread, though more detail would render a more comprehensive review of the assignment. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably well. Major points are supported by good examples or analysis.
1 to 9
The Discussion Board Forum prompt is addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis.
0 points
Not present
Retail Models
14 to 15 points
All assignment components are thoughtfully and comprehensively detailed, reflecting collegiate level reasoning and support. Relevant examples or explanations render a clear understanding of the assignment principles.
11 to 13
Most of the components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread, though more detail would render a more comprehensive review of the assignment. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably well. Major points are supported by good examples or analysis.
1 to 10
The Discussion Board Forum prompt is addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis.
0 points
Not present
Marketing
Innovation
14 to 15 points
All assignment components are thoughtfully and comprehensively detailed, reflecting collegiate level reasoning and support. Relevant examples or explanations render a clear understanding of the assignment principles.
11 to 13 points
Most of the components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread, though more detail would render a more comprehensive review of the assignment. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably well. Major points are supported by good examples or analysis.
1 to 10 points
The Discussion Board Forum prompt is addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis.
0 points
Not present
Spiritual Integration
5 points
Provides detailed answer/application to Scriptural integration prompt.
4 points
Minimum word count of 100-199 words met.
1-3 points
Minimum word count of 1-99 words met.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Thread: Grammar and Spelling, Word Count.
19 to 21 points
Meets 350-word minimum, spelling and grammar are co ...
MSN Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal PapersCriteria.docxgilpinleeanna
MSN Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED -
1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking
(0–30 Points)
30 to 30 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics
25 to 29 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics
20 to 24 points
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics.
16 to 19 points
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
0 to 15 points
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: Purpose of the paper is clear
(0–5 Points)
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 to 4 points
Purpose of the Assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1 to 3 points
Purpose of the Assignment is vague.
0 to 0 points
No purpose statement was provided.
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS
The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to-
1. Understand and interpret the Assignment’s key concepts
(0–10 Points)
10 to 10 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
9 to 9 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
8 to 8 points
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
5 to 7 points
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
0 to 4 points
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e., video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources
(0–20 Points)
20 to 20 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3–4 course resources to support point of view.
15 to 19 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3–4 course resources to support point of view.
10 to 14 points
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3–4 course resources to support major points and point of view.
3 to 9 points
Minimally includes and integ ...
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLeEvonCanales257
EDUC 701
Course Project: Final Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Title Page and Abstract
10 points
A title page is present and provides clarity to the purpose of the paper. An effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body is provided by the abstract. Word count (100–120 words) is met.
8 to 9 points
A title page is present but lacks clarity to the purpose of the paper. The Abstract exists but does not provide an effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body. Minimum of 100 words is met.
1 to 7 points
A title page is missing. The Abstract is vague and does not convey a personal philosophy of education. The 100-word minimum is not met.
0 points
Not present
Body – Introduction/ Thesis Statement
10 points
Introduction is well-constructed and presents a clear explanation of the problem, conveys a good argument of why the problem is good to research, concludes with the research question, and is strongly aligned with the title and body of the paper.
8 to 9 points
A somewhat clear presentation of the problem is present, an argument why the problem is good to research is conveyed, and the title and body of the paper aligns with it.
1 to 8 points
The problem is poorly introduced, vaguely stated, or does not align with the title and/or body of the paper.
0 points
Not present
Body – Literature Review and Learning Theory or Theories
37 to 40 points
Literature synthesizes references to support the topic. Learning theories are introduced as well as foundational people and their works. Theoretical frameworks are presented coherently and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education.
34 to 36 points
Literature review somewhat synthesizes the references to support the topic. Learning theories are somewhat introduced. Theoretical frameworks are mostly presented and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education.
1 to 33 points
Literature review poorly synthesizes the references that support the topic. Learning theories are poorly introduced and explained. Theoretical frameworks are not presented.
0 points
Not present
Body – Key Terms
18 to 20 points
Key terms are well defined, and definitions are supported by authoritative sources.
17 points
Key terms are defined, and most definitions are supported by authoritative sources.
1 to 16 points
Key terms are adequately defined, and most definitions are not supported by an authoritative source.
0 points
Not present
Body – Gaps in Literature
18 to 20 points
Gaps in the literature are thoroughly identified and described by careful analysis of content.
17 points
Gaps in the literature are somewhat identified and described by careful analysis of content.
1 to 16 points
Gaps in the literature are not present or are inadequately described.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
18 to 20 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropr ...
PADM 620Assignment 3 Administrative Law InstructionsRead all .docxkarlhennesey
PADM 620
Assignment 3: Administrative Law Instructions
Read all instructions and the grading rubric carefully before writing this assignment. You are responsible for reading and understanding these documents.
For this assignment, you are required to choose between producing a PowerPoint presentation, a video presentation, or writing a research paper. This assignment must focus on the relationship between administrative law and public administration.
Read Exercise 8 in the Dresang text, the Metzger article, and conduct your own research; then you will draft a 5–7-page research paper or a 9–10-minute presentation. In your paper/presentation, you must explain the relationship between, and impact of, Administrative Law on Public Administration.
Option 1: Research Paper
If you elect to write a research paper for this assignment, the text of this research paper must be 5–7 pages (not including title page, reference page, and any appendices). This paper must be in current APA format with 1-inch margins and 12-pt Times New Roman font. A title page and reference page must also be included. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources.
Option 2: PowerPoint Presentation
If you elect to complete a PowerPoint presentation with audio (see tutorial in the Assignment Instructions folder for adding audio), the presentation must include 9–10 minutes of spoken audio. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources. In addition to the presentation, you must submit a separate document listing all references in current APA format.
Option 3: Video Presentation
If you elect to complete an original video presentation, the presentation must include 9–10 minutes of spoken audio. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources. Images may be incorporated where appropriate. In addition to the video, you must submit a separate document listing all references in current APA format.
General Instructions
You are expected to comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical standards. Additionally, to do well on this assignment, you must conduct high quality research and offer rich, well-supported analysis and ...
Assignment Instructions
Assignment 1: Socialization
Due by 11:55p on Sunday of Week 3
Assignment 1 meets the following course objectives:
Apply a sociological perspective to the social world.
Analyze contemporary social issues using the sociological imagination and use sociological theories and concepts to analyze everyday life.
Demonstrate the ability to identify, locate, and retrieve information related to the topics in the course.
Describe culture and socialization
Purpose
The primary goal of this exercise is to apply your developing sociological knowledge and skills to the analysis of the process of socialization.
Writing Expectations
This should be 4-6 pages long, double-spaced, 11pt font (arial or times new roman), with 1" margins.
Instructions:
Describe and analyze the process of socialization.
Begin with responding to the question “Who Am I?” In your description, make sure to incorporate the concepts we have addressed in the course, such as roles, statuses, group membership, etc. Your response to this question should be at least 1+ page in length. Next,
analyze
at least
4 agents of socialization
that have affected your development as an individual, focusing on childhood socialization into adulthood. Consider, for example, the ways in which the family, religion, media, peers, and education have influenced your development, opportunities, and life choices. Your analysis of the process of socialization should be 3+ pages in length and incorporate
at least 4 sociological concepts or theories
covered in this course (hint: sociological concepts should be clearly identified and then applied; any paraphrasing or direct quotes used from another source should include APA formatted in-text citations and a full citation at the end of the essay. Examples of related concepts and theories include the self, moral development, nature and nurture, and resocialization).
Grading Rubric
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Who am I description
5 points
Exemplary
Detailed description of individual’s identity, roles, statuses as applicable
5 points
Accomplished
Discussed roles and statuses, including the setting and preparation as applicable
4.3 points
Developing
Discussed roles and statuses, some details lacking
3.8 points
Beginning
Briefly described roles and statuses, details lacking
3.3 points
Did not attempt
No discussion of roles and statuses or description lacks detail
0 points
Analysis of socialization
10 points
Exemplary
Clearly analyzed socialization process, identifying and describing 4+ influential agents of socialization
10 points
Accomplished
Discussed the socialization process, identifies and describes 4 influential agents of socialization
8.5 points
Developing
Discussed the socialization process; some detail lacking.
7.5 points
Beginning
Discussed meaning of the events; did not include cultural, symbolic, structural, or social meaning
6.5 points
Did ...
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal.docxwillcoxjanay
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal analysis and vertical analysis.
Use the corporation you selected for the Week 4 discussion or another corporation when responding to the two following questions. In your response identify the selected corporation. Please note that substantive responses add new topic related information to help move the discussion forward and do not summarize what was previously posted by another student.
Teachers question below
As a manager, how will you use the horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet for intracompany comparisons? How do managers and investors use the vertical analysis of the income statement and balance sheet compared to competitor corporations when performing intercompany comparisons? Identify at least one competitor corporation and include an explanation as to why or how you selected the competitor.
Reference
Kimmel, P. D. (2013). Financial accounting: Tools for business decision making. Retrieved from University of Phoenix eBook Collection.
Please read INSTRUCTORS instructions carefully and completely
My organization that I choose is Starbucks
Due date 4/21/15 in 4 to 6 hours
No plagiarism in own words
Will run through a plagiarism checker
Will not accept if after due date will dispute
References page must include a valid URL to take the reader to the electronic copy of each source.
If cannot complete with the given instructions do not reply
Please contact me if you have questions
Write as a discussion with another student
Make a question out of the response, or I found the material interesting, or what do you think
I may ask to change some areas at later date
100 to 200 word count
Word count is counted by answer only
Please write with question first followed by answer
Please write clearly simplify
I am in the U.S.
No charts or graphs
Interview a teacher in the elementary grades regarding the teacher's social studies instruction. Include at least eight questions.
Create your own questions such as:
1.Do you use a textbook?
2.What do you think of the standards for social studies?
3.How much time is spent per day in this subject area?
Document the interview questions and answers and submit with the Standards Essay.
Standards Essay
Choose one grade level in the elementary grades. Evaluate the social studies standards on the Arizona Department of Education's website for that grade level for such things as thoroughness, clarity, and two other criteria of your own choosing.
Write an essay of 750-1,000-words as a well-supported, objective, academic response to the interview and standards investigation, analyzing how social studies is currently taught today.
Use the GCU Library to research a minimum of six peer-reviewed articles that support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
1 ...
Compare and Contrast Essay AssignmentA Compare and Contrast essaLynellBull52
This document provides instructions for a compare and contrast essay assignment. Students are asked to write a 2-3 page essay comparing and contrasting two topics related to generations or families. The document provides the requirements for the essay, including length, formatting, and content. It also describes the process for writing the essay, including brainstorming, researching the topics, identifying similarities and differences, developing a thesis statement, and organizing the paper.
Contents of Final Paper The final paper summarizing the s.docxbobbywlane695641
The document outlines the requirements for a final paper summarizing a service learning experience. It states that the paper should include an identification of the agency, a description of its purpose and mission, a description of the work done by the learner, and a description of the area observed. The paper must also apply two organizational behavior concepts from the course to the agency and integrate a Christian worldview perspective. It provides guidance on length, citations, references, and a required verification letter from the agency.
BIBL 104
Bible Dictionary Project Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Acheivement
Points
Earned
Advanced
Competent
Novice
Development
37 to 42 points
• Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported.
• Content is persuasive and comprehensive.
• Content and purpose of the writing is clear.
• Essential data has a strong claim.
• The audience is clear and appropriate for the topic.
• Supportive information (if required) is strong and addresses writing focus.
30 to 36 points
• Major points are addressed but clarity or support is limited.
• Content is somewhat persuasive or comprehensive.
• Content is inconsistent (lack of clear purpose and/or clarity).
• Essential data could be stronger.
• Supportive information (if required) needs strengthening or does not address writing concepts.
0 to 29 points
• Major points are unclear and/or insufficiently supported.
• Content is missing essentials.
• Content has unsatisfactory purpose, focus, and clarity.
• Supportive information (if required) is missing.
Organization & Structure
37 to 42 points
• Writing is well-structured, clear, and easy to follow.
30 to 36 points
• Adequately organized with some areas difficult to follow.
0 to 29 points
• Organization and structure detract from the writer’s message.
Grammar & Diction
37 to 42 points
• The writing reflects grammatical, punctuation, and spelling standards.
• Language is accurate, appropriate, and effective.
• Writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective.
30 to 36 points
• The writing contains some grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
• Language is unclear, awkward, or inappropriate in parts.
• The writing’s tone is generally appropriate and moderately effective.
0 to 29 points
• The writing contains many grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
• Language use is largely inaccurate or inappropriate.
• The writing’s tone is ineffective and/or inappropriate.
Paper Requirements
12 to 14 points
• Writing correctly follows formatting guidelines.
• Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are used correctly and appropriately.
9 to 11 points
• Writing follows most formatting guidelines, but some flaws are detected.
• Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are incorrectly formatted or used.
0 to 8 points
• Writing lacks many elements of correct formatting.
• Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations and/or references are not provided.
Total
Instructor’s Comments:
BIBL 104
Bible Dictionary Project Topic Lists
Page 4 of 6
Old Testament Characters
Aaron
Abraham
Absalom
Adam
Ahab
Amos
Bathsheba
Belshazzar
Boaz
Caleb
Cyrus
Daniel
David
Darius
Deborah
Delilah
Eli
Elijah
Elisha
Esau
Esther
Ezekiel
Ezra
Eve
Gideon
Habakkuk
Haggai
Hannah
Hezekiah
Hiram
Hosea
Isaac
Isaiah
Jacob
Jehu
Jeremiah
Jezebel
Joash
Job
Joel
Jonah
Jonathan
Joseph (Son of Jacob)
Joshua
Josiah
Judah
Laban
Leah
Lot
Malachi
Manasseh
Micah
Mordecai
Moses
Nahum
Nathan
Nehemiah
Noah
Obadiah
Rachel
Rahab
Rebekah
Reuben
Ruth
Sam ...
Thinking through the material covered in these 8 weeks.docxrhetttrevannion
Thinking through the material covered in these 8 weeks, respond to the following for your final exam:
1. What is your biggest takeaway with regard to the material on women and girls as
victims of crime? Why?
2. What is your biggest takeaway with regard to women and girls as
perpetrators of crime? Why?
3. What is your biggest takeaway with regard to women as
professionals in the criminal legal system? Why?
Each of these three questions should be answered in essay format, and material from your modules should be used and cited in your answers. Each essay should be 2-3 pages, double spaced, with no extraneous spacing (so a total of 6 to 9 pages). Please cite the information you use for your answers within and at the end of the text. Late submissions will receive a grade of zero.
View Rubric
Informative Rubric (1) (1)
Informative Rubric (1) (1)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
Purpose, Focus and Organization
view longer description
5 pts
Excellent
The main idea is easy to find. All the ideas are connected to the topic through explanation.
4 pts
Mastery
The main idea is easy to find. The examples and details are linked to the topic, but not well explained.
3 pts
Good Job
The main idea is easy to find. Most of the ideas are connected to the topic.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
The main idea may be hard to find. The examples and details are not connected.
1 pts
Needs Help
The writing is difficult to understand.
/ 5 pts
Purpose, Focus and Organization
view longer description
5 pts
Excellent
The tone is academic, nothing is written in a personal manner.
4 pts
Mastery
The tone is objective but not academic, missing the precise academic vocabulary.
3 pts
Good Job
The writer used personal pronouns and or did not stay objective.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
There are many personal pronouns, it is informal.
1 pts
Needs Help
It is unclear what kind of style the writer used. It is personal.
/ 5 pts
Purpose, Focus and Organization
view longer description
5 pts
Excellent
There are full introduction and concluding paragraphs. The ideas build on each other in an order that makes sense.
4 pts
Mastery
There are introductory and concluding paragraphs. The order of ideas makes sense.
3 pts
Good Job
The introduction and or conclusion may be missing information.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing either the introduction or conclusion.
1 pts
Needs Help
The essay was written as one paragraph. No clear organization of ideas.
/ 5 pts
Purpose, Focus and Organization
view longer description
5 pts
Excellent
Transition words and phrases are used between paragraphs and in the paragraphs to move from one idea to the next smoothly.
4 pts
Mastery
Transition words and phrases are used, but may be repeated, or simple
3 pts
Good Job
The essay may be missing transitions, and/ or the ideas sound more like a list than a paragraph.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
There are few to no transitions, and the ideas are listed.
1 pts
Needs Help
It is difficu.
DirectionsThe first step in this research process is to choose a.docxmecklenburgstrelitzh
Directions
The first step in this research process is to choose a topic. Do not feel confined to traditional topics or topics on which you already have a strong opinion. As you delve into the research, you may find your focus and understanding of the issue alters.
Some ideas to explore:
5
·
· Hacktivism
· Facial recognition technology
· Violent protest
· Sugar tax
· Supervised injection facilities
· Mental health and police wellness checks
· Abolishing the penny
· Universal basic income
· Media bias
· Racism in America
· The Electoral College
· Drones
· Social Media
Explore other topics of interest to you and then discuss the topic with your instructor. Avoid topics that have already been legislated or discussed in depth (e.g., legalization of marijuana, the death penalty, bullying, religion, abortion, same-sex marriage, etc.). The topic you choose will be your research focus for the entire class, so choose a topic you are eager to explore.
As you move through the research process, you will have the opportunity to examine the issue critically, take a position, and develop a reasoned argument in support of your position. Your Portfolio Project will take the form of a well-researched paper using reliable sources and APA formatting for citations. In the paper, you will need to interpret and intelligently discuss the issue and support your findings with evidence. There will be portions of your research process required for submission throughout the class as listed below.
Requirements and Formatting
Your Portfolio Project must be formatted as follows:
· APA formatting
· Title Page
· Times New Roman or Arial 12-point font
· 1-inch margins
· Page numbers in top right corner
ENGL101 - Portfolio Project Rubric
Criteria
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Points
Content
40 points
32 - 40 points
· Provides an introduction to the writing and sets the context within which the argument is formed; includes a clear and focused thesis taking a position and laying out main points
· Explains clearly and thoroughly the writer’s position and why the writer believes in the argument made
· Contains specific descriptions, examples, and research to support the writer’s thesis; makes clear connection between research and the persuasive point and acknowledges counterarguments
· Presents final thoughts on the topic; persuades audience this information is important to know
· Paper meets minimum 4-page requirement
31 - 24 points
· Introduction adequately explains the topic but lacks details to create audience interest or lacks a strong, clear position
· The central purpose of the work is identified. Ideas are generally focused in a way that supports the thesis.
· Begins to offer reasons to support its points, perhaps using varied kinds of evidence. Assumes evidence speaks for itself and needs little to no application to the point being discussed.
· Conclusion is recognizable but may lack audience relevance.
· Paper is 2-3 pages in length.
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that ssuser774ad41
The document provides instructions and evaluation criteria for an argument essay assignment. Students must write a 3-4 page essay arguing one side of an issue related to climate change, universal healthcare, or employer access to social media. The essay must have an introduction with a thesis, 3 body paragraphs with evidence from sources, and a conclusion. It will be evaluated on the introduction and conclusion, organization, argument development, use of sources, length, writing quality, and following APA format.
CriteriaLevels of AchievementContent 70Advanced 90-100.docxwillcoxjanay
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Thread: Content
32 to 35 points
The initial thread exceeds content requirements:
· Original thread fully addresses all aspects of the prompt; detailed & descriptive
· Major points are supported through textbook citations and /or outside primary resource. (Scripture where appropriate.)
· Thread clearly organized & easy to read; ideas are clear; flow smoothly
Required word count (at least 350 words) is met.
25 to 31 points
The initial thread meets the content requirements:
· Original thread fully addresses all aspects of the prompt; detailed & descriptive
· Major points are supported through textbook citations and /or outside primary resource. (Scripture where appropriate.)
· Thread clearly organized & easy to read; ideas are clear; flow smoothly
Required word count (at least 350 words) is met.
1 to 24 points
The initial thread meets some of the content requirements:
· Original thread fully addresses all aspects of the prompt; detailed & descriptive
· Major points are supported through textbook citations and /or outside primary resource. (Scripture where appropriate.)
· Thread clearly organized & easy to read; ideas are clear; flow smoothly
Required word count (at least 350 words) is met.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Thread: Grammar and Spelling, APA formatting
(30%)
14 to 15 points
The initial post exceeds requirements:
Thread is free of grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation error.
Citation of references in current APA format.
11 to 13 points
The initial thread meets requirements:
Thread is free of grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation error.
Citation of references in current APA format.
1 to 10 points
The initial thread meets some of the structure requirements:
Thread is free of grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation error.
Citation of references in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Reply 1: Content
7 points
First reply exceeds content requirements:
Required word count (250 words or more each) for 2 replies is met.
Reply posts are built upon parent posts and provide APA primary supportive citations
Replies are clearly organized & easy to read; ideas flow smoothly
5 to 6 points
First reply meets content requirements:
Required word count (120 words or more each) for 2 replies is met.
Reply posts are built upon parent posts and provide APA primary supportive citations
Replies are clearly organized & easy to read; ideas flow smoothly
1 to 4 points
First reply meets some of the content requirements:
Required word count (250 words or more each) for 2 replies is met.
Reply posts are built upon parent posts and provide APA primary supportive citations
Replies are clearly organized & easy to read; ideas flow smoothly
0 points
Not pr.
1
BUSS215 – Management Principles
Portfolio Project Directions and Rubric
This Assessment is worth 20% of your grade.
Completing this Assessment will help you to:
Course Outcomes:
• Explain various motivational techniques and rewards designed to improve employee
satisfaction.
• Apply the five primary functions of management; staffing, planning, organizing,
controlling and leading.
• Develop and demonstrate an understanding of how strategic planning meets the
organizational and departmental business objectives.
• Create and present a research paper that includes the basic functions of management that
defends your management and leadership decision-making process using Multimedia.
Program Outcomes:
• Recognize management and leadership skills.
• Identify and apply the basice functions of management such as staffing, planning,
organizing, controlling, and leading to the decision-making process.
Institutional Outcomes:
• Information Literacy and Communication - Utilize apporopriate current technology
and resources to locate and evaluate information needed to accomplish a goal, and then
communicate findings in visual, written and/or oral formats.
• Relational Learning - Transfer knowledge, skills and behaviors acquired through formal
and informal learning and life experiences to new situations.
• Community and Career - Participate in social, learning, and professional communities
for personal and career growth.
Deadlines
Timeline Activity Grading
Due Week 6 by Wednesday
at 11:59 pm, ET.
Submit your rough draft for
peer review.
This will count for 20% of
your overall Portfolio
Project grade.
Due Week 7 by Saturday at
11:59 pm, ET.
Upload your Portfolio Project to
Upload to your ePortfolio.
This will count for 80% of
your overall Portfolio
Project grade.
BUSS215 – Portfolio Project 2
Directions:
You will have the opportunity to write a Portfolio Project in which you explore a business
concept that is interesting to you and relate the ideas covered in this course which you may then
connect to your life and your future career interests.
Using your information literacy skills, you will research the information necessary to write your
Portfolio Project on a concept in business that we have covered in this course (please see below
for the approved topic list). The main objective of this Portfolio Project is to explore a business
concept, summarize the concept, and analyze the main points of experts in the field. In the
project you will provide a summary of the topic along with how it relates to what you have
learned in this course as well as to your role as a professional.
It is an expectation for this course that all written projects will follow the standards for fair use of
information, including the avoidance of all intentional and unintentional plagiarism, and
incorporating appropriate usage according to the conventions of the APA citatio ...
Requirements of a Managed Care Executive Essay.pdf4934bk
This document provides instructions for an assignment requiring students to research and summarize the role of a healthcare professional from an interdisciplinary team. Students must choose from a list of 9 roles, conduct an interview with someone in that role, research the role's professional organization, background, and two relevant journal articles. They are to write a 5-6 page paper summarizing their findings and reflecting on the role's power, impact, differences from nursing, and how nursing can advance interdisciplinary collaboration.
CharacteristicHigh Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standa.docxspoonerneddy
Characteristic:
High Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standard.
Distinction (70-79) Very good standard.
Credit (60-69) Good standard.
Pass (50-59)
Fair or poor standard.
Fail (Below 49)
Not up to standard.
Question and
The approach to the
The question is very
The question is well
The question is only
The question is
Central
question is excellent;
well answered and
but only partially
fairly or superficially
not answered and
Argument:
it is answered directly and fully. As a consequence,
there is a clear thesis statement, however, one or two
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement is
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement
there is no thesis statement.
there is a clear
gaps or
only partially
outlines a
thesis statement that comprehensively
shortcomings are evident either in
complete.
superficial or incomplete
answers the question and thereby
terms of addressing the question or
argument.
effectively outlines
establishing the flow
the essay’s central
of the rest of the
argument.
essay.
Structure:
The essay is extremely well
The essay is very well structured with
The essay is well structured, and the
The essay is not well structured, and
The essay is not sufficiently
structured with fully
developed and
material is well
the material is only
structured in
developed and
focused
organised in
fairly or poorly
accordance with
focused paragraphs,
paragraphs, and the
accordance with
organised in terms
both exploring and
and the material is
material is very well
both exploring and
of both exploring
demonstrating an
extremely well
organised in
demonstrating its
and demonstrating
argument. There
organised in
accordance with
central argument.
its central
are significant
accordance with
both exploring and
However, gaps,
argument.
gaps, errors, or
both exploring and
demonstrating its
errors, or
Consequently,
contradictions
demonstrating its
central argument.
contradictions exist,
significant, gaps,
which heavily
central argument.
However, some
thereby,
errors, or
detract from the
Topic sentences are clearly evident and
gaps or shortcomings exist
undermining the essay’s analysis
contradictions exist which detract from
essay.
are crafted at an
in the analysis and
and the formatting
the analysis and the
excellent standard.
the formatting of the essay’s ideas.
of its ideas.
formatting of the essay’s ideas.
Critical
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has not
Reflection:
critically engaged at an excellent
critically engaged at a very good
critically engaged at a good standard
partially critically engaged with the
critically engaged sufficiently enough
standard with the
standard with the
with the topic,
topic, readings,
with the topic,
topic, readings,
topic, readings,
readings, question
question and
readings, question
question and
question and
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
relevant theories. It,
theories. It,
therefor.
CharacteristicHigh Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standa.docxbissacr
Characteristic:
High Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standard.
Distinction (70-79) Very good standard.
Credit (60-69) Good standard.
Pass (50-59)
Fair or poor standard.
Fail (Below 49)
Not up to standard.
Question and
The approach to the
The question is very
The question is well
The question is only
The question is
Central
question is excellent;
well answered and
but only partially
fairly or superficially
not answered and
Argument:
it is answered directly and fully. As a consequence,
there is a clear thesis statement, however, one or two
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement is
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement
there is no thesis statement.
there is a clear
gaps or
only partially
outlines a
thesis statement that comprehensively
shortcomings are evident either in
complete.
superficial or incomplete
answers the question and thereby
terms of addressing the question or
argument.
effectively outlines
establishing the flow
the essay’s central
of the rest of the
argument.
essay.
Structure:
The essay is extremely well
The essay is very well structured with
The essay is well structured, and the
The essay is not well structured, and
The essay is not sufficiently
structured with fully
developed and
material is well
the material is only
structured in
developed and
focused
organised in
fairly or poorly
accordance with
focused paragraphs,
paragraphs, and the
accordance with
organised in terms
both exploring and
and the material is
material is very well
both exploring and
of both exploring
demonstrating an
extremely well
organised in
demonstrating its
and demonstrating
argument. There
organised in
accordance with
central argument.
its central
are significant
accordance with
both exploring and
However, gaps,
argument.
gaps, errors, or
both exploring and
demonstrating its
errors, or
Consequently,
contradictions
demonstrating its
central argument.
contradictions exist,
significant, gaps,
which heavily
central argument.
However, some
thereby,
errors, or
detract from the
Topic sentences are clearly evident and
gaps or shortcomings exist
undermining the essay’s analysis
contradictions exist which detract from
essay.
are crafted at an
in the analysis and
and the formatting
the analysis and the
excellent standard.
the formatting of the essay’s ideas.
of its ideas.
formatting of the essay’s ideas.
Critical
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has not
Reflection:
critically engaged at an excellent
critically engaged at a very good
critically engaged at a good standard
partially critically engaged with the
critically engaged sufficiently enough
standard with the
standard with the
with the topic,
topic, readings,
with the topic,
topic, readings,
topic, readings,
readings, question
question and
readings, question
question and
question and
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
relevant theories. It,
theories. It,
therefor.
This document outlines the requirements and guidelines for an e-portfolio assignment for a Foundation in Natural and Built Environment (FNBE) English course. Students must create an online portfolio reflecting on their learning process and outcomes for graded assignments. The portfolio requires students to upload photos and write reflective entries for assignments, addressing their goals, accomplishments, strengths/weaknesses. It will be assessed based on demonstrated understanding, content relevance, organization, use of references, and mechanics. Suggested references and a cover page template are also provided.
Business and Government Relations Please respond to the following.docxCruzIbarra161
"Business and Government Relations" Please respond to the following:
Discuss the main reasons why a business should or should not be involved in political discussions or take a political stand. Use terms found in Chapter 9 to demonstrate your understanding of the material. You can submit your initial discussion post and responses in either written or video format (2-3 minutes or less).
.
Business Continuity Planning Explain how components of the busine.docxCruzIbarra161
Business Continuity Planning: Explain how components of the business infrastructure are included in a business continuity plan. Discuss the processes of planning, analysis, design, implementation, testing and maintenance in developing this plan. This assignment must be at least 2 full pages. Apply the 4-C's of writing:
Correct, complete, clear, and concise.
.
business and its environment Discuss the genesis, contributing fac.docxCruzIbarra161
business and its environment
Discuss the genesis, contributing factors, modus operandi, effectiveness in generating social pressure, the strategy followed by target companies along with allied aspects with two examples from Canadian mining, manufacturing, telecommunication or utility companies.
minimum of 2000 words and 10 good quality references.
The paper should be properly cited as per
APA format.
.
business and its environment Discuss the genesis, contributing facto.docxCruzIbarra161
business and its environment Discuss the genesis, contributing factors, modus operandi, effectiveness in generating social pressure, the strategy followed by target companies along with allied aspects with two examples from Canadian mining, manufacturing, telecommunication or utility companies. minimum of 2000 words and 10 good quality references. The paper should be properly cited as per APA format.
.
More Related Content
Similar to Criteria Ratings PointsIntroduction 5 to 4.0 ptsAdvan
Busi 330 Db 2 Grading RubricBased on 70-point maximumCriteria.docxjasoninnes20
Busi 330 Db 2 Grading Rubric
Based on 70-point maximum
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Marketing Strategies
13 to 14 points
All assignment components are thoughtfully and comprehensively detailed, reflecting collegiate level reasoning and support. Relevant examples or explanations render a clear understanding of the assignment principles.
10 to 12
Most of the components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread, though more detail would render a more comprehensive review of the assignment. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably well. Major points are supported by good examples or analysis.
1 to 9
The Discussion Board Forum prompt is addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis.
0 points
Not present
Retail Models
14 to 15 points
All assignment components are thoughtfully and comprehensively detailed, reflecting collegiate level reasoning and support. Relevant examples or explanations render a clear understanding of the assignment principles.
11 to 13
Most of the components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread, though more detail would render a more comprehensive review of the assignment. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably well. Major points are supported by good examples or analysis.
1 to 10
The Discussion Board Forum prompt is addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis.
0 points
Not present
Marketing
Innovation
14 to 15 points
All assignment components are thoughtfully and comprehensively detailed, reflecting collegiate level reasoning and support. Relevant examples or explanations render a clear understanding of the assignment principles.
11 to 13 points
Most of the components of the Discussion Board Forum prompt are answered in the thread, though more detail would render a more comprehensive review of the assignment. The thread has a logical flow. Major points are stated reasonably well. Major points are supported by good examples or analysis.
1 to 10 points
The Discussion Board Forum prompt is addressed minimally. The thread lacks flow or content. Major points are unclear or confusing. Major points are not supported by examples or thoughtful analysis.
0 points
Not present
Spiritual Integration
5 points
Provides detailed answer/application to Scriptural integration prompt.
4 points
Minimum word count of 100-199 words met.
1-3 points
Minimum word count of 1-99 words met.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Thread: Grammar and Spelling, Word Count.
19 to 21 points
Meets 350-word minimum, spelling and grammar are co ...
MSN Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal PapersCriteria.docxgilpinleeanna
MSN Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED -
1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking
(0–30 Points)
30 to 30 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics
25 to 29 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics
20 to 24 points
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics.
16 to 19 points
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
0 to 15 points
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: Purpose of the paper is clear
(0–5 Points)
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 to 4 points
Purpose of the Assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1 to 3 points
Purpose of the Assignment is vague.
0 to 0 points
No purpose statement was provided.
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS
The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to-
1. Understand and interpret the Assignment’s key concepts
(0–10 Points)
10 to 10 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
9 to 9 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
8 to 8 points
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
5 to 7 points
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
0 to 4 points
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e., video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources
(0–20 Points)
20 to 20 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3–4 course resources to support point of view.
15 to 19 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3–4 course resources to support point of view.
10 to 14 points
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3–4 course resources to support major points and point of view.
3 to 9 points
Minimally includes and integ ...
EDUC 701Course Project Final Paper Grading RubricCriteriaLeEvonCanales257
EDUC 701
Course Project: Final Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Title Page and Abstract
10 points
A title page is present and provides clarity to the purpose of the paper. An effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body is provided by the abstract. Word count (100–120 words) is met.
8 to 9 points
A title page is present but lacks clarity to the purpose of the paper. The Abstract exists but does not provide an effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body. Minimum of 100 words is met.
1 to 7 points
A title page is missing. The Abstract is vague and does not convey a personal philosophy of education. The 100-word minimum is not met.
0 points
Not present
Body – Introduction/ Thesis Statement
10 points
Introduction is well-constructed and presents a clear explanation of the problem, conveys a good argument of why the problem is good to research, concludes with the research question, and is strongly aligned with the title and body of the paper.
8 to 9 points
A somewhat clear presentation of the problem is present, an argument why the problem is good to research is conveyed, and the title and body of the paper aligns with it.
1 to 8 points
The problem is poorly introduced, vaguely stated, or does not align with the title and/or body of the paper.
0 points
Not present
Body – Literature Review and Learning Theory or Theories
37 to 40 points
Literature synthesizes references to support the topic. Learning theories are introduced as well as foundational people and their works. Theoretical frameworks are presented coherently and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education.
34 to 36 points
Literature review somewhat synthesizes the references to support the topic. Learning theories are somewhat introduced. Theoretical frameworks are mostly presented and lay a foundation for the overall learning theory education.
1 to 33 points
Literature review poorly synthesizes the references that support the topic. Learning theories are poorly introduced and explained. Theoretical frameworks are not presented.
0 points
Not present
Body – Key Terms
18 to 20 points
Key terms are well defined, and definitions are supported by authoritative sources.
17 points
Key terms are defined, and most definitions are supported by authoritative sources.
1 to 16 points
Key terms are adequately defined, and most definitions are not supported by an authoritative source.
0 points
Not present
Body – Gaps in Literature
18 to 20 points
Gaps in the literature are thoroughly identified and described by careful analysis of content.
17 points
Gaps in the literature are somewhat identified and described by careful analysis of content.
1 to 16 points
Gaps in the literature are not present or are inadequately described.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
18 to 20 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropr ...
PADM 620Assignment 3 Administrative Law InstructionsRead all .docxkarlhennesey
PADM 620
Assignment 3: Administrative Law Instructions
Read all instructions and the grading rubric carefully before writing this assignment. You are responsible for reading and understanding these documents.
For this assignment, you are required to choose between producing a PowerPoint presentation, a video presentation, or writing a research paper. This assignment must focus on the relationship between administrative law and public administration.
Read Exercise 8 in the Dresang text, the Metzger article, and conduct your own research; then you will draft a 5–7-page research paper or a 9–10-minute presentation. In your paper/presentation, you must explain the relationship between, and impact of, Administrative Law on Public Administration.
Option 1: Research Paper
If you elect to write a research paper for this assignment, the text of this research paper must be 5–7 pages (not including title page, reference page, and any appendices). This paper must be in current APA format with 1-inch margins and 12-pt Times New Roman font. A title page and reference page must also be included. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources.
Option 2: PowerPoint Presentation
If you elect to complete a PowerPoint presentation with audio (see tutorial in the Assignment Instructions folder for adding audio), the presentation must include 9–10 minutes of spoken audio. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources. In addition to the presentation, you must submit a separate document listing all references in current APA format.
Option 3: Video Presentation
If you elect to complete an original video presentation, the presentation must include 9–10 minutes of spoken audio. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources. Images may be incorporated where appropriate. In addition to the video, you must submit a separate document listing all references in current APA format.
General Instructions
You are expected to comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical standards. Additionally, to do well on this assignment, you must conduct high quality research and offer rich, well-supported analysis and ...
Assignment Instructions
Assignment 1: Socialization
Due by 11:55p on Sunday of Week 3
Assignment 1 meets the following course objectives:
Apply a sociological perspective to the social world.
Analyze contemporary social issues using the sociological imagination and use sociological theories and concepts to analyze everyday life.
Demonstrate the ability to identify, locate, and retrieve information related to the topics in the course.
Describe culture and socialization
Purpose
The primary goal of this exercise is to apply your developing sociological knowledge and skills to the analysis of the process of socialization.
Writing Expectations
This should be 4-6 pages long, double-spaced, 11pt font (arial or times new roman), with 1" margins.
Instructions:
Describe and analyze the process of socialization.
Begin with responding to the question “Who Am I?” In your description, make sure to incorporate the concepts we have addressed in the course, such as roles, statuses, group membership, etc. Your response to this question should be at least 1+ page in length. Next,
analyze
at least
4 agents of socialization
that have affected your development as an individual, focusing on childhood socialization into adulthood. Consider, for example, the ways in which the family, religion, media, peers, and education have influenced your development, opportunities, and life choices. Your analysis of the process of socialization should be 3+ pages in length and incorporate
at least 4 sociological concepts or theories
covered in this course (hint: sociological concepts should be clearly identified and then applied; any paraphrasing or direct quotes used from another source should include APA formatted in-text citations and a full citation at the end of the essay. Examples of related concepts and theories include the self, moral development, nature and nurture, and resocialization).
Grading Rubric
Exemplary
Accomplished
Developing
Beginning
Did not attempt
Who am I description
5 points
Exemplary
Detailed description of individual’s identity, roles, statuses as applicable
5 points
Accomplished
Discussed roles and statuses, including the setting and preparation as applicable
4.3 points
Developing
Discussed roles and statuses, some details lacking
3.8 points
Beginning
Briefly described roles and statuses, details lacking
3.3 points
Did not attempt
No discussion of roles and statuses or description lacks detail
0 points
Analysis of socialization
10 points
Exemplary
Clearly analyzed socialization process, identifying and describing 4+ influential agents of socialization
10 points
Accomplished
Discussed the socialization process, identifies and describes 4 influential agents of socialization
8.5 points
Developing
Discussed the socialization process; some detail lacking.
7.5 points
Beginning
Discussed meaning of the events; did not include cultural, symbolic, structural, or social meaning
6.5 points
Did ...
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal.docxwillcoxjanay
Two popular methods of financial statement analysis are horizontal analysis and vertical analysis.
Use the corporation you selected for the Week 4 discussion or another corporation when responding to the two following questions. In your response identify the selected corporation. Please note that substantive responses add new topic related information to help move the discussion forward and do not summarize what was previously posted by another student.
Teachers question below
As a manager, how will you use the horizontal analysis of the income statement and balance sheet for intracompany comparisons? How do managers and investors use the vertical analysis of the income statement and balance sheet compared to competitor corporations when performing intercompany comparisons? Identify at least one competitor corporation and include an explanation as to why or how you selected the competitor.
Reference
Kimmel, P. D. (2013). Financial accounting: Tools for business decision making. Retrieved from University of Phoenix eBook Collection.
Please read INSTRUCTORS instructions carefully and completely
My organization that I choose is Starbucks
Due date 4/21/15 in 4 to 6 hours
No plagiarism in own words
Will run through a plagiarism checker
Will not accept if after due date will dispute
References page must include a valid URL to take the reader to the electronic copy of each source.
If cannot complete with the given instructions do not reply
Please contact me if you have questions
Write as a discussion with another student
Make a question out of the response, or I found the material interesting, or what do you think
I may ask to change some areas at later date
100 to 200 word count
Word count is counted by answer only
Please write with question first followed by answer
Please write clearly simplify
I am in the U.S.
No charts or graphs
Interview a teacher in the elementary grades regarding the teacher's social studies instruction. Include at least eight questions.
Create your own questions such as:
1.Do you use a textbook?
2.What do you think of the standards for social studies?
3.How much time is spent per day in this subject area?
Document the interview questions and answers and submit with the Standards Essay.
Standards Essay
Choose one grade level in the elementary grades. Evaluate the social studies standards on the Arizona Department of Education's website for that grade level for such things as thoroughness, clarity, and two other criteria of your own choosing.
Write an essay of 750-1,000-words as a well-supported, objective, academic response to the interview and standards investigation, analyzing how social studies is currently taught today.
Use the GCU Library to research a minimum of six peer-reviewed articles that support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
1 ...
Compare and Contrast Essay AssignmentA Compare and Contrast essaLynellBull52
This document provides instructions for a compare and contrast essay assignment. Students are asked to write a 2-3 page essay comparing and contrasting two topics related to generations or families. The document provides the requirements for the essay, including length, formatting, and content. It also describes the process for writing the essay, including brainstorming, researching the topics, identifying similarities and differences, developing a thesis statement, and organizing the paper.
Contents of Final Paper The final paper summarizing the s.docxbobbywlane695641
The document outlines the requirements for a final paper summarizing a service learning experience. It states that the paper should include an identification of the agency, a description of its purpose and mission, a description of the work done by the learner, and a description of the area observed. The paper must also apply two organizational behavior concepts from the course to the agency and integrate a Christian worldview perspective. It provides guidance on length, citations, references, and a required verification letter from the agency.
BIBL 104
Bible Dictionary Project Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Acheivement
Points
Earned
Advanced
Competent
Novice
Development
37 to 42 points
• Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported.
• Content is persuasive and comprehensive.
• Content and purpose of the writing is clear.
• Essential data has a strong claim.
• The audience is clear and appropriate for the topic.
• Supportive information (if required) is strong and addresses writing focus.
30 to 36 points
• Major points are addressed but clarity or support is limited.
• Content is somewhat persuasive or comprehensive.
• Content is inconsistent (lack of clear purpose and/or clarity).
• Essential data could be stronger.
• Supportive information (if required) needs strengthening or does not address writing concepts.
0 to 29 points
• Major points are unclear and/or insufficiently supported.
• Content is missing essentials.
• Content has unsatisfactory purpose, focus, and clarity.
• Supportive information (if required) is missing.
Organization & Structure
37 to 42 points
• Writing is well-structured, clear, and easy to follow.
30 to 36 points
• Adequately organized with some areas difficult to follow.
0 to 29 points
• Organization and structure detract from the writer’s message.
Grammar & Diction
37 to 42 points
• The writing reflects grammatical, punctuation, and spelling standards.
• Language is accurate, appropriate, and effective.
• Writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective.
30 to 36 points
• The writing contains some grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
• Language is unclear, awkward, or inappropriate in parts.
• The writing’s tone is generally appropriate and moderately effective.
0 to 29 points
• The writing contains many grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
• Language use is largely inaccurate or inappropriate.
• The writing’s tone is ineffective and/or inappropriate.
Paper Requirements
12 to 14 points
• Writing correctly follows formatting guidelines.
• Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are used correctly and appropriately.
9 to 11 points
• Writing follows most formatting guidelines, but some flaws are detected.
• Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are incorrectly formatted or used.
0 to 8 points
• Writing lacks many elements of correct formatting.
• Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations and/or references are not provided.
Total
Instructor’s Comments:
BIBL 104
Bible Dictionary Project Topic Lists
Page 4 of 6
Old Testament Characters
Aaron
Abraham
Absalom
Adam
Ahab
Amos
Bathsheba
Belshazzar
Boaz
Caleb
Cyrus
Daniel
David
Darius
Deborah
Delilah
Eli
Elijah
Elisha
Esau
Esther
Ezekiel
Ezra
Eve
Gideon
Habakkuk
Haggai
Hannah
Hezekiah
Hiram
Hosea
Isaac
Isaiah
Jacob
Jehu
Jeremiah
Jezebel
Joash
Job
Joel
Jonah
Jonathan
Joseph (Son of Jacob)
Joshua
Josiah
Judah
Laban
Leah
Lot
Malachi
Manasseh
Micah
Mordecai
Moses
Nahum
Nathan
Nehemiah
Noah
Obadiah
Rachel
Rahab
Rebekah
Reuben
Ruth
Sam ...
Thinking through the material covered in these 8 weeks.docxrhetttrevannion
Thinking through the material covered in these 8 weeks, respond to the following for your final exam:
1. What is your biggest takeaway with regard to the material on women and girls as
victims of crime? Why?
2. What is your biggest takeaway with regard to women and girls as
perpetrators of crime? Why?
3. What is your biggest takeaway with regard to women as
professionals in the criminal legal system? Why?
Each of these three questions should be answered in essay format, and material from your modules should be used and cited in your answers. Each essay should be 2-3 pages, double spaced, with no extraneous spacing (so a total of 6 to 9 pages). Please cite the information you use for your answers within and at the end of the text. Late submissions will receive a grade of zero.
View Rubric
Informative Rubric (1) (1)
Informative Rubric (1) (1)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
Purpose, Focus and Organization
view longer description
5 pts
Excellent
The main idea is easy to find. All the ideas are connected to the topic through explanation.
4 pts
Mastery
The main idea is easy to find. The examples and details are linked to the topic, but not well explained.
3 pts
Good Job
The main idea is easy to find. Most of the ideas are connected to the topic.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
The main idea may be hard to find. The examples and details are not connected.
1 pts
Needs Help
The writing is difficult to understand.
/ 5 pts
Purpose, Focus and Organization
view longer description
5 pts
Excellent
The tone is academic, nothing is written in a personal manner.
4 pts
Mastery
The tone is objective but not academic, missing the precise academic vocabulary.
3 pts
Good Job
The writer used personal pronouns and or did not stay objective.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
There are many personal pronouns, it is informal.
1 pts
Needs Help
It is unclear what kind of style the writer used. It is personal.
/ 5 pts
Purpose, Focus and Organization
view longer description
5 pts
Excellent
There are full introduction and concluding paragraphs. The ideas build on each other in an order that makes sense.
4 pts
Mastery
There are introductory and concluding paragraphs. The order of ideas makes sense.
3 pts
Good Job
The introduction and or conclusion may be missing information.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
Missing either the introduction or conclusion.
1 pts
Needs Help
The essay was written as one paragraph. No clear organization of ideas.
/ 5 pts
Purpose, Focus and Organization
view longer description
5 pts
Excellent
Transition words and phrases are used between paragraphs and in the paragraphs to move from one idea to the next smoothly.
4 pts
Mastery
Transition words and phrases are used, but may be repeated, or simple
3 pts
Good Job
The essay may be missing transitions, and/ or the ideas sound more like a list than a paragraph.
2 pts
Needs Improvement
There are few to no transitions, and the ideas are listed.
1 pts
Needs Help
It is difficu.
DirectionsThe first step in this research process is to choose a.docxmecklenburgstrelitzh
Directions
The first step in this research process is to choose a topic. Do not feel confined to traditional topics or topics on which you already have a strong opinion. As you delve into the research, you may find your focus and understanding of the issue alters.
Some ideas to explore:
5
·
· Hacktivism
· Facial recognition technology
· Violent protest
· Sugar tax
· Supervised injection facilities
· Mental health and police wellness checks
· Abolishing the penny
· Universal basic income
· Media bias
· Racism in America
· The Electoral College
· Drones
· Social Media
Explore other topics of interest to you and then discuss the topic with your instructor. Avoid topics that have already been legislated or discussed in depth (e.g., legalization of marijuana, the death penalty, bullying, religion, abortion, same-sex marriage, etc.). The topic you choose will be your research focus for the entire class, so choose a topic you are eager to explore.
As you move through the research process, you will have the opportunity to examine the issue critically, take a position, and develop a reasoned argument in support of your position. Your Portfolio Project will take the form of a well-researched paper using reliable sources and APA formatting for citations. In the paper, you will need to interpret and intelligently discuss the issue and support your findings with evidence. There will be portions of your research process required for submission throughout the class as listed below.
Requirements and Formatting
Your Portfolio Project must be formatted as follows:
· APA formatting
· Title Page
· Times New Roman or Arial 12-point font
· 1-inch margins
· Page numbers in top right corner
ENGL101 - Portfolio Project Rubric
Criteria
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Points
Content
40 points
32 - 40 points
· Provides an introduction to the writing and sets the context within which the argument is formed; includes a clear and focused thesis taking a position and laying out main points
· Explains clearly and thoroughly the writer’s position and why the writer believes in the argument made
· Contains specific descriptions, examples, and research to support the writer’s thesis; makes clear connection between research and the persuasive point and acknowledges counterarguments
· Presents final thoughts on the topic; persuades audience this information is important to know
· Paper meets minimum 4-page requirement
31 - 24 points
· Introduction adequately explains the topic but lacks details to create audience interest or lacks a strong, clear position
· The central purpose of the work is identified. Ideas are generally focused in a way that supports the thesis.
· Begins to offer reasons to support its points, perhaps using varied kinds of evidence. Assumes evidence speaks for itself and needs little to no application to the point being discussed.
· Conclusion is recognizable but may lack audience relevance.
· Paper is 2-3 pages in length.
The draft addresses the question or issue in a way that ssuser774ad41
The document provides instructions and evaluation criteria for an argument essay assignment. Students must write a 3-4 page essay arguing one side of an issue related to climate change, universal healthcare, or employer access to social media. The essay must have an introduction with a thesis, 3 body paragraphs with evidence from sources, and a conclusion. It will be evaluated on the introduction and conclusion, organization, argument development, use of sources, length, writing quality, and following APA format.
CriteriaLevels of AchievementContent 70Advanced 90-100.docxwillcoxjanay
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Thread: Content
32 to 35 points
The initial thread exceeds content requirements:
· Original thread fully addresses all aspects of the prompt; detailed & descriptive
· Major points are supported through textbook citations and /or outside primary resource. (Scripture where appropriate.)
· Thread clearly organized & easy to read; ideas are clear; flow smoothly
Required word count (at least 350 words) is met.
25 to 31 points
The initial thread meets the content requirements:
· Original thread fully addresses all aspects of the prompt; detailed & descriptive
· Major points are supported through textbook citations and /or outside primary resource. (Scripture where appropriate.)
· Thread clearly organized & easy to read; ideas are clear; flow smoothly
Required word count (at least 350 words) is met.
1 to 24 points
The initial thread meets some of the content requirements:
· Original thread fully addresses all aspects of the prompt; detailed & descriptive
· Major points are supported through textbook citations and /or outside primary resource. (Scripture where appropriate.)
· Thread clearly organized & easy to read; ideas are clear; flow smoothly
Required word count (at least 350 words) is met.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Thread: Grammar and Spelling, APA formatting
(30%)
14 to 15 points
The initial post exceeds requirements:
Thread is free of grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation error.
Citation of references in current APA format.
11 to 13 points
The initial thread meets requirements:
Thread is free of grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation error.
Citation of references in current APA format.
1 to 10 points
The initial thread meets some of the structure requirements:
Thread is free of grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation error.
Citation of references in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced 90-100%
Proficient 70-89%
Developing 1-69%
Not present
Reply 1: Content
7 points
First reply exceeds content requirements:
Required word count (250 words or more each) for 2 replies is met.
Reply posts are built upon parent posts and provide APA primary supportive citations
Replies are clearly organized & easy to read; ideas flow smoothly
5 to 6 points
First reply meets content requirements:
Required word count (120 words or more each) for 2 replies is met.
Reply posts are built upon parent posts and provide APA primary supportive citations
Replies are clearly organized & easy to read; ideas flow smoothly
1 to 4 points
First reply meets some of the content requirements:
Required word count (250 words or more each) for 2 replies is met.
Reply posts are built upon parent posts and provide APA primary supportive citations
Replies are clearly organized & easy to read; ideas flow smoothly
0 points
Not pr.
1
BUSS215 – Management Principles
Portfolio Project Directions and Rubric
This Assessment is worth 20% of your grade.
Completing this Assessment will help you to:
Course Outcomes:
• Explain various motivational techniques and rewards designed to improve employee
satisfaction.
• Apply the five primary functions of management; staffing, planning, organizing,
controlling and leading.
• Develop and demonstrate an understanding of how strategic planning meets the
organizational and departmental business objectives.
• Create and present a research paper that includes the basic functions of management that
defends your management and leadership decision-making process using Multimedia.
Program Outcomes:
• Recognize management and leadership skills.
• Identify and apply the basice functions of management such as staffing, planning,
organizing, controlling, and leading to the decision-making process.
Institutional Outcomes:
• Information Literacy and Communication - Utilize apporopriate current technology
and resources to locate and evaluate information needed to accomplish a goal, and then
communicate findings in visual, written and/or oral formats.
• Relational Learning - Transfer knowledge, skills and behaviors acquired through formal
and informal learning and life experiences to new situations.
• Community and Career - Participate in social, learning, and professional communities
for personal and career growth.
Deadlines
Timeline Activity Grading
Due Week 6 by Wednesday
at 11:59 pm, ET.
Submit your rough draft for
peer review.
This will count for 20% of
your overall Portfolio
Project grade.
Due Week 7 by Saturday at
11:59 pm, ET.
Upload your Portfolio Project to
Upload to your ePortfolio.
This will count for 80% of
your overall Portfolio
Project grade.
BUSS215 – Portfolio Project 2
Directions:
You will have the opportunity to write a Portfolio Project in which you explore a business
concept that is interesting to you and relate the ideas covered in this course which you may then
connect to your life and your future career interests.
Using your information literacy skills, you will research the information necessary to write your
Portfolio Project on a concept in business that we have covered in this course (please see below
for the approved topic list). The main objective of this Portfolio Project is to explore a business
concept, summarize the concept, and analyze the main points of experts in the field. In the
project you will provide a summary of the topic along with how it relates to what you have
learned in this course as well as to your role as a professional.
It is an expectation for this course that all written projects will follow the standards for fair use of
information, including the avoidance of all intentional and unintentional plagiarism, and
incorporating appropriate usage according to the conventions of the APA citatio ...
Requirements of a Managed Care Executive Essay.pdf4934bk
This document provides instructions for an assignment requiring students to research and summarize the role of a healthcare professional from an interdisciplinary team. Students must choose from a list of 9 roles, conduct an interview with someone in that role, research the role's professional organization, background, and two relevant journal articles. They are to write a 5-6 page paper summarizing their findings and reflecting on the role's power, impact, differences from nursing, and how nursing can advance interdisciplinary collaboration.
CharacteristicHigh Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standa.docxspoonerneddy
Characteristic:
High Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standard.
Distinction (70-79) Very good standard.
Credit (60-69) Good standard.
Pass (50-59)
Fair or poor standard.
Fail (Below 49)
Not up to standard.
Question and
The approach to the
The question is very
The question is well
The question is only
The question is
Central
question is excellent;
well answered and
but only partially
fairly or superficially
not answered and
Argument:
it is answered directly and fully. As a consequence,
there is a clear thesis statement, however, one or two
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement is
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement
there is no thesis statement.
there is a clear
gaps or
only partially
outlines a
thesis statement that comprehensively
shortcomings are evident either in
complete.
superficial or incomplete
answers the question and thereby
terms of addressing the question or
argument.
effectively outlines
establishing the flow
the essay’s central
of the rest of the
argument.
essay.
Structure:
The essay is extremely well
The essay is very well structured with
The essay is well structured, and the
The essay is not well structured, and
The essay is not sufficiently
structured with fully
developed and
material is well
the material is only
structured in
developed and
focused
organised in
fairly or poorly
accordance with
focused paragraphs,
paragraphs, and the
accordance with
organised in terms
both exploring and
and the material is
material is very well
both exploring and
of both exploring
demonstrating an
extremely well
organised in
demonstrating its
and demonstrating
argument. There
organised in
accordance with
central argument.
its central
are significant
accordance with
both exploring and
However, gaps,
argument.
gaps, errors, or
both exploring and
demonstrating its
errors, or
Consequently,
contradictions
demonstrating its
central argument.
contradictions exist,
significant, gaps,
which heavily
central argument.
However, some
thereby,
errors, or
detract from the
Topic sentences are clearly evident and
gaps or shortcomings exist
undermining the essay’s analysis
contradictions exist which detract from
essay.
are crafted at an
in the analysis and
and the formatting
the analysis and the
excellent standard.
the formatting of the essay’s ideas.
of its ideas.
formatting of the essay’s ideas.
Critical
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has not
Reflection:
critically engaged at an excellent
critically engaged at a very good
critically engaged at a good standard
partially critically engaged with the
critically engaged sufficiently enough
standard with the
standard with the
with the topic,
topic, readings,
with the topic,
topic, readings,
topic, readings,
readings, question
question and
readings, question
question and
question and
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
relevant theories. It,
theories. It,
therefor.
CharacteristicHigh Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standa.docxbissacr
Characteristic:
High Distinction (80 and above). Excellent standard.
Distinction (70-79) Very good standard.
Credit (60-69) Good standard.
Pass (50-59)
Fair or poor standard.
Fail (Below 49)
Not up to standard.
Question and
The approach to the
The question is very
The question is well
The question is only
The question is
Central
question is excellent;
well answered and
but only partially
fairly or superficially
not answered and
Argument:
it is answered directly and fully. As a consequence,
there is a clear thesis statement, however, one or two
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement is
answered. Consequently, the thesis statement
there is no thesis statement.
there is a clear
gaps or
only partially
outlines a
thesis statement that comprehensively
shortcomings are evident either in
complete.
superficial or incomplete
answers the question and thereby
terms of addressing the question or
argument.
effectively outlines
establishing the flow
the essay’s central
of the rest of the
argument.
essay.
Structure:
The essay is extremely well
The essay is very well structured with
The essay is well structured, and the
The essay is not well structured, and
The essay is not sufficiently
structured with fully
developed and
material is well
the material is only
structured in
developed and
focused
organised in
fairly or poorly
accordance with
focused paragraphs,
paragraphs, and the
accordance with
organised in terms
both exploring and
and the material is
material is very well
both exploring and
of both exploring
demonstrating an
extremely well
organised in
demonstrating its
and demonstrating
argument. There
organised in
accordance with
central argument.
its central
are significant
accordance with
both exploring and
However, gaps,
argument.
gaps, errors, or
both exploring and
demonstrating its
errors, or
Consequently,
contradictions
demonstrating its
central argument.
contradictions exist,
significant, gaps,
which heavily
central argument.
However, some
thereby,
errors, or
detract from the
Topic sentences are clearly evident and
gaps or shortcomings exist
undermining the essay’s analysis
contradictions exist which detract from
essay.
are crafted at an
in the analysis and
and the formatting
the analysis and the
excellent standard.
the formatting of the essay’s ideas.
of its ideas.
formatting of the essay’s ideas.
Critical
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has
The writer has not
Reflection:
critically engaged at an excellent
critically engaged at a very good
critically engaged at a good standard
partially critically engaged with the
critically engaged sufficiently enough
standard with the
standard with the
with the topic,
topic, readings,
with the topic,
topic, readings,
topic, readings,
readings, question
question and
readings, question
question and
question and
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
and relevant
relevant theories. It,
relevant theories. It,
theories. It,
therefor.
This document outlines the requirements and guidelines for an e-portfolio assignment for a Foundation in Natural and Built Environment (FNBE) English course. Students must create an online portfolio reflecting on their learning process and outcomes for graded assignments. The portfolio requires students to upload photos and write reflective entries for assignments, addressing their goals, accomplishments, strengths/weaknesses. It will be assessed based on demonstrated understanding, content relevance, organization, use of references, and mechanics. Suggested references and a cover page template are also provided.
Similar to Criteria Ratings PointsIntroduction 5 to 4.0 ptsAdvan (18)
Business and Government Relations Please respond to the following.docxCruzIbarra161
"Business and Government Relations" Please respond to the following:
Discuss the main reasons why a business should or should not be involved in political discussions or take a political stand. Use terms found in Chapter 9 to demonstrate your understanding of the material. You can submit your initial discussion post and responses in either written or video format (2-3 minutes or less).
.
Business Continuity Planning Explain how components of the busine.docxCruzIbarra161
Business Continuity Planning: Explain how components of the business infrastructure are included in a business continuity plan. Discuss the processes of planning, analysis, design, implementation, testing and maintenance in developing this plan. This assignment must be at least 2 full pages. Apply the 4-C's of writing:
Correct, complete, clear, and concise.
.
business and its environment Discuss the genesis, contributing fac.docxCruzIbarra161
business and its environment
Discuss the genesis, contributing factors, modus operandi, effectiveness in generating social pressure, the strategy followed by target companies along with allied aspects with two examples from Canadian mining, manufacturing, telecommunication or utility companies.
minimum of 2000 words and 10 good quality references.
The paper should be properly cited as per
APA format.
.
business and its environment Discuss the genesis, contributing facto.docxCruzIbarra161
business and its environment Discuss the genesis, contributing factors, modus operandi, effectiveness in generating social pressure, the strategy followed by target companies along with allied aspects with two examples from Canadian mining, manufacturing, telecommunication or utility companies. minimum of 2000 words and 10 good quality references. The paper should be properly cited as per APA format.
.
Business BUS 210 research outline1.Cover page 2.Table .docxCruzIbarra161
Business BUS 210 research outline
1.
Cover page
2.
Table of content
3.
Executive summary
4.
Introduction
5.
Business Hypothesis / or Statement/ or the Main Question for the whole research
6.
Literature review
7.
Designing the questionnaires
8.
Pretest/ pilot test
9.
Adjust the questioners
– if required
10.
Collect the data from the official sample
11.
Data Entry
12.
Analysis
13.
Tabulations: Frequencies
“and Cross-tabulation if required”
14.
Report
o
Include the purpose for the business research
o
Time
o
Sample size
o
Location
o
Target
o
Way to collect the data (by email, personal, interview, phone…)
o
Challenges you faced
o
Findings /results
15.
Conclusion
16.
Recommendation
17.
References
18.
Appendixes
o
Questionnaire
o
All tabulations
.
BUS 439 International Human Resource ManagementInstructor Steven .docxCruzIbarra161
BUS 439 International Human Resource Management
Instructor: Steven Foster
Why did Nestle’s decentralized structure, which had brought the company success in the past, no longer fit the new realities of increasing global competition? What were the objectives of the GLOBE initiative? How was it more than just an SAP change?
.
BUS 439 International Human Resource ManagementEmployee Value Pr.docxCruzIbarra161
BUS 439 International Human Resource Management
Employee Value Proposition
Define and discuss EVP – what factors may make it difficult to determine EVP on a global basis? What considerations should be made to clearly understand and make use of this information? Why is EVP important for organizations to understand? What can organizations do to build a differentiated EVP?
.
Bullzeye is a discount retailer offering a wide range of products,.docxCruzIbarra161
Bullzeye is a discount retailer offering a wide range of products, including: home goods, clothing, toys, and food. The company is a regional retailer with 10 brick-and-mortar stores as well as a popular online store. Due to the recent credit card data breaches of various prominent national retail companies (e.g., Target, Home Depot, Staples), the Bullzeye Board of Directors has taken particular interest in information security, especially as it pertains to the protection of credit cardholder data within the Bullzeye environment. The Board has asked executive management to evaluate and strengthen the enterprise’s information security infrastructure, where needed.
In order to respond to the Board regarding their preparedness for a cyber-security attack, the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) has engaged your IT consulting firm to identify the inherent risks and recommend control remediation strategies to prevent or to detect and appropriately respond to data breaches. Your firm has been requested to liaison with the Internal Audit Department during the engagement. Your first step is to gain an understanding of Bullzeye’s IT environment. The Chief Audit Executive (CAE) schedules a meeting with key Bullzeye leadership personnel, including the CFO, Chief Information Officer (CIO), and Chief Information Security Officer (CISO).
The following key information was obtained.
Background
IT Security Framework/Policy -
Bullzeye has an information security policy, which was developed by the CISO. The policy was developed in response to an internal audit conducted by an external firm hired by the CAE. The policy is not based on one specific IT control framework but considers elements contained within several frameworks. An information security committee has been recently formed to discuss new security risks and to develop mitigation strategies.
The meeting will be held monthly and include the CISO and other key IT Directors reporting to the CIO.
In addition, a training program was implemented last year in order to provide education on various information security topics (e.g., social engineering, malware, etc.). The program requires that all staff within the IT department complete an annual information security training webinar and corresponding quiz. The training program is complemented by a monthly e-mail sent to IT staff, which highlights relevant information security topics.
General IT Environment -
Most employees in the corporate office are assigned a standard desktop computer, although certain management personnel in the corporate and retail locations are issued a laptop if they can demonstrate their need to work remotely. The laptops are given a standard Microsoft Windows operating system image, which includes anti-malware/anti-virus software and patch update software among others. In addition, new laptops are now encrypted; however, desktops and existing laptops are not currently encrypted due to budget concerns. The user provisioning.
Building on the work that you prepared for Milestones One through Th.docxCruzIbarra161
Building on the work that you prepared for Milestones One through Three, submit a document that builds upon the previously completed milestone summaries to provide an overall summary of the distribution company’s IT system as a whole. This should illustrate how each individual system component (network, database, web technology, computers, programming, and security systems) interrelates with the others and summarize the importance of IT technologies for the overall system.
.
Budget Legislation Once the budget has been prepared by the vari.docxCruzIbarra161
Budget Legislation
Once the budget has been prepared by the various agencies, it is often moved forward to the legislative body for authorization. The legislation process can result in unintended outcomes and restrictions. Search the internet and news reporting services for a story on an unintended outcome of interest to you and answer the following questions:
How did politics shape the outcome in unexpected ways?
Did “pork” spending or “apportionments and allotments” budget amendments affect the legislation?
Did a mid-year crisis or change in revenue expectations substantially impact the budget legislative action?
Respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings.
Performance Budgeting
Performance budgeting has been attempted at the local level in recent years. Address the issues of performance budgeting while answering the following questions: What attributes of performance budgeting make it particularly suitable to local government budgeting? Will the same attributes be as useful at the federal level? Respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings.
.
Browsing the podcasts on iTunes or YouTube, listen to a few of Gramm.docxCruzIbarra161
Browsing the podcasts on iTunes or YouTube, listen to a few of Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips series (grammar tips by Mignon Fogarty) or Money Girl's series (financial advice by Laura Adams).
Your Task: Pick a Money Girl or Grammar Girl podcast that interests you. Listen to it, or obtain a transcript on the website and study it for its structure. Is it direct or indirect? Informative or persuasive? How is it presented? What style does the speaker adopt? Was it effective? What changes would you suggest? Write an e-mail that discusses the podcast you analyzed.
.
Brown Primary Care Dental clinics Oral Health Initiative p.docxCruzIbarra161
Brown Primary Care Dental clinics Oral Health Initiative project
The project will consist of three elements:
•
Part 1: Economic Analysis of the Initiative of Choice [
Brown Primary Care Dental clinics Oral Health Initiative
5 pages) .
The economic analysis should include:
Principles of economics for evaluating and assessing the need for the public health initiative
A brief description of whether the initiative is a micro or macroeconomic program
A determination of whether the result of the initiative is a public or private good
A description of the initiative’s financing source
An explanation of how the initiative may affect supply and demand of public health services
•
Part 2: Financial Accounting Analysis (5 pages)
A 5-year proposed budget including major line items (see blank form for proposed budget on NIH grants pagelocated in the course syllabus or here:
Online Article:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2009, June).
Public health service: PHS 398
. Detailed Budget for Initial Budget Period Form Page 4
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html
Grant Application PHS 398. U.S. Department of Health And Human Services Public Health Service.
-An analysis of budget line items, costs, sources of revenue, and deficits
-An analysis of the fiscal soundness and long-term viability of the public -health initiative
•
Part 3: Alternative Funding Sources (5pages)
Part 3: Alternative Funding Sources[ 5 pages
For this part of your Scholar-Practitioner Project you will evaluate funding sources for the public health initiative you selected in Week 2. Then, you will submit a mock grant proposal for an appropriate grant to supplement or allow expansion of your selected public health initiative.
The proposal should include:
•
The public health initiative’s purpose, background, goals, and objectives
•
A description of the funding sources you selected and explanation of why you selected it over others
•
Eligibility and selection criteria for the funding source
•
An explanation of the funds needed and how the funds may be used
•
The adjusted total 5-year budget you completed in week 9 (include all instructor recommendations)
(8 sources/references)
.
BUDDHISMWEEK 3Cosmogony - Origin of the UniverseNature of .docxCruzIbarra161
BUDDHISM
WEEK 3
Cosmogony - Origin of the Universe
Nature of God/Creator
View of Human Nature
View of Good & Evil
View of Salvation
View of After Life
Practices and Rituals
Celebrations & Festivals
Week 3 - Sources
.
Build a binary search tree that holds first names.Create a menu .docxCruzIbarra161
Build a binary search tree that holds first names.
Create a menu with the following options.
Add a name to the list (will add a new node)
Delete a name from the list (will delete a node)
NEXT PAGE
à
Search for a name (will return if the name is in the tree or not)
Output the number of leaves in your tree
Output the tree (Complete an inorder traversal.)
.
Briefly describe the development of the string quartet. How would yo.docxCruzIbarra161
Briefly describe the development of the string quartet. How would you relate this chamber ensemble to modern performing groups such as the jazz quartet? Or to a rock ensemble? What are some of the similarities and differences? Refer to the listening examples in the Special Focus to support your conclusions.
Listening examples:
String Quartet in E-Flat, No. 2
("Joke") by Haydn
String Quartet in C Minor
by Beethoven
String Quartet No. 2, Op. 17
by Bartók
.
Briefly describe a time when you were misled by everyday observation.docxCruzIbarra161
Briefly describe a time when you were misled by everyday observations (that is when you reached a conclusion on the basis of an everyday observation that you later decided was an incorrect conclusion). What type of error in casual inquiry (sources of secondhand knowledge) were you guilty of? Examples include over-generalization, stereotyping, illogical reasoning, etc
.
Broadening Your Perspective 8-1The financial statements of Toots.docxCruzIbarra161
Broadening Your Perspective 8-1
The financial statements of Tootsie Roll are presented below.
TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
Earnings, Comprehensive Earnings and Retained Earnings (in thousands except per share data)
For the year ended December 31,
2011
2010
2009
Net product sales
$528,369
$517,149
$495,592
Rental and royalty revenue
4,136
4,299
3,739
Total revenue
532,505
521,448
499,331
Product cost of goods sold
365,225
349,334
319,775
Rental and royalty cost
1,038
1,088
852
Total costs
366,263
350,422
320,627
Product gross margin
163,144
167,815
175,817
Rental and royalty gross margin
3,098
3,211
2,887
Total gross margin
166,242
171,026
178,704
Selling, marketing and administrative expenses
108,276
106,316
103,755
Impairment charges
—
—
14,000
Earnings from operations
57,966
64,710
60,949
Other income (expense), net
2,946
8,358
2,100
Earnings before income taxes
60,912
73,068
63,049
Provision for income taxes
16,974
20,005
9,892
Net earnings
$43,938
$53,063
$53,157
Net earnings
$43,938
$53,063
$53,157
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)
(8,740
)
1,183
2,845
Comprehensive earnings
$35,198
$54,246
$56,002
Retained earnings at beginning of year.
$135,866
$147,687
$144,949
Net earnings
43,938
53,063
53,157
Cash dividends
(18,360
)
(18,078
)
(17,790
)
Stock dividends
(47,175
)
(46,806
)
(32,629
)
Retained earnings at end of year
$114,269
$135,866
$147,687
Earnings per share
$0.76
$0.90
$0.89
Average Common and Class B Common shares outstanding
57,892
58,685
59,425
(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
Financial Position
TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (in thousands except per share data)
Assets
December 31,
2011
2010
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents
$78,612
$115,976
Investments
10,895
7,996
Accounts receivable trade, less allowances of $1,731 and $1,531
41,895
37,394
Other receivables
3,391
9,961
Inventories:
Finished goods and work-in-process
42,676
35,416
Raw materials and supplies
29,084
21,236
Prepaid expenses
5,070
6,499
Deferred income taxes
578
689
Total current assets
212,201
235,167
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, at cost:
Land
21,939
21,696
Buildings
107,567
102,934
Machinery and equipment
322,993
307,178
Construction in progress
2,598
9,243
455,097
440,974
Less—Accumulated depreciation
242,935
225,482
Net property, plant and equipment
212,162
215,492
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill
73,237
73,237
Trademarks
175,024
175,024
Investments
96,161
64,461
Split dollar officer life insurance
74,209
.
Briefly discuss the differences in the old Minimum Foundation Prog.docxCruzIbarra161
Briefly discuss the differences in the old Minimum Foundation Program ( 1947 ) and the FEFP ( 1973 ).
What part of the basic FEFP formula ( State Aid = WFTE x BSA - (.96 AV } provides A. equity for students and B. equalization of funding for districts?
Review how student transportation dollars are calculated. What are the two major components?
What is the function of Workforce Development funds?
What are Categorical Program funds? How do they differ from general FEFP funding?
What are the four constructs on which the FEFP is based? ( Page 1--2
nd
paragraph )
Briefly define the following:
Full time equivalent
Program cost factor
Weighted FTE
Base student allocation
District cost differential
Sparsity supplement
Supplemental academic instruction
0.748 Mills Discretionary Compresion (audio is incorrect-changed from Local Discretionary Equalization).
ESE guaranteed allocation
Required local effort
Please answer all in as a mini- brief and follow directions as I tried to be as spicific as possible with the questions.
.
Briefly compare and contrast EHRs, EMRs, and PHRs. Include the typic.docxCruzIbarra161
Briefly compare and contrast EHRs, EMRs, and PHRs. Include the typical content and functionality of each.
Focusing on one of these types of records, describe the key benefits for one of the stakeholders (e.g., patients, providers, or health care management) of being able to record and/or access patient data through this system.
Should all patient health information be recorded electronically? If so, explain why. If not, explain what the exceptions should be and why.
.
Brief Exercise 9-11Suppose Nike, Inc. reported the followin.docxCruzIbarra161
*Brief Exercise 9-11
Suppose
Nike, Inc.
reported the following plant assets and intangible assets for the year ended May 31, 2014 (in millions): other plant assets $954.9; land $226.7; patents and trademarks (at cost) $530.7; machinery and equipment $2,137.2; buildings $967; goodwill (at cost) $207.5; accumulated amortization $59.3; and accumulated depreciation $2,290.
Prepare a partial balance sheet for Nike for these items.
(List Property, Plant and Equipment in order of Land, Buildings and Equipment.)
NIKE, INC.
Partial Balance Sheet
As of May 31, 2014
(in millions)
[removed]
[removed]
$
[removed]
[removed]
$
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
:
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
$
[removed]
[removed]
:
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
*Exercise 9-7
Wang Co. has delivery equipment that cost $50,840 and has been depreciated $24,960.
Record entries for the disposal under the following assumptions.
(Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually.)
(a)
It was scrapped as having no value.
(b)
It was sold for $37,200.
(c)
It was sold for $19,360.
No.
Account Titles and Explanation
Debit
Credit
(a)
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
(b)
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
(c)
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
*Exercise 9-8
Here are selected 2014 transactions of Cleland Corporation.
Jan. 1
Retired a piece of machinery that was purchased on January 1, 2004. The machine cost $62,160 and had a useful life of 10 years with no salvage value.
June 30
Sold a computer that was purchased on January 1, 2012. The computer cost $37,000 and had a useful life of 4 years with no salvage value. The computer was sold for $5,630 cash.
Dec. 31
Sold a delivery truck for $9,310 cash. The truck cost $23,600 when it was purchased on January 1, 2011, and was depreciated based on a 5-year useful life with a $3,290 salvage value.
Journalize all entries required on the above dates, including entries to update depreciation on assets disposed of, where applicable. Cleland Corporation uses straight-line depreciation.
(Record entries in the order displayed in the problem statement. Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually.)
Date
Account Titles and Explanation
Debit
Credit
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
(To record depreciation expense for the first 6 months of 2014)
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[remo.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Criteria Ratings PointsIntroduction 5 to 4.0 ptsAdvan
1. Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction 5 to >4.0 pts
Advanced
The Introduction to the
essay is present and
includes a clear thesis
statement. The
Introduction begins with a
Level 1 heading.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
The Introduction
to the essay is
present and
includes a thesis
statement. The
Introduction
begins with a
Level 1 heading.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The Introduction
to the essay is
2. limited or
incomplete,
and/or A Level
1 heading is not
provided.
0 pts
Not Present
An Introduction is
not present.
5 pts
Biblical
Integration/Content
33 to >29.0 pts
Advanced
Integration of the Bible
with multiple course topics
is present throughout the
essay. A clear, logical flow
is present throughout the
essay. The points made
are fully developed.
Content is organized
under Level 1 headings.
29 to >27.0 pts
Proficient
3. Integration of the
Bible with
multiple course
topics is present
throughout most
of the essay. A
clear, logical flow
is present
throughout most
of the essay.
Content is
organized under
Level 1
headings.
27 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Integration of the
Bible with course
topics is
incomplete or
narrow in scope.
The major points
are not stated
clearly
throughout
essay. Content
is not organized
under Level 1
headings.
0 pts
Not Present
4. The Bible was not
integrated with
course topics in the
essay.
33 pts
Conclusion 5 to >4.0 pts
Advanced
The Conclusion is present
and reiterates the main
points of the essay. The
Conclusion begins with a
Level 1 heading.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
The Conclusion
is present and
partially
reiterates the
main points of
the essay. The
Conclusion
begins with a
Level 1 heading.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
5. A conclusion is
present, but
limited or
incomplete;
and/or no
heading is
provided.
0 pts
Not Present
A conclusion is not
present.
5 pts
Biblical Integration Essay Grading Rubric |
BUSI643_B02_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Sources 10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
Cites and discusses
specific Scriptures
correctly throughout the
narrative to support the
arguments being made.
Cites and discusses the
course textbook correctly
throughout the narrative to
6. support the arguments
being made.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Cites and
discusses
Scriptures in the
narrative to
support the
arguments being
made. Cites and
discusses the
course textbook
in the narrative to
support the
arguments being
made.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Specific
Scriptures are
not cited or
clearly discussed
in the narrative;
and/or the
textbook is not
cited or clearly
discussed in the
narrative.
7. 0 pts
Not Present
The arguments in
the paper are not
supported by
references/sources.
10 pts
Page Count 12 to >10.0 pts
Advanced
The essay is at least two
(2) complete pages of
original narrative, not
counting the title page,
reference page, and
quotations.
10 to >9.0 pts
Proficient
The paper is at
least 1.75
complete pages
of original
narrative, not
counting the title
page, reference
page, and
quotations.
8. 9 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The paper is at
least 1.50
complete pages
of original
narrative, not
counting the title
page, reference
page, and
quotations.
0 pts
Not Present
The paper is less
than 1.50 complete
pages of original
narrative, not
counting the title
page, reference
page, and
quotations.
12 pts
APA Formatting 5 to >4.0 pts
Advanced
All of the following are in
the APA format: • In
text citations and
9. reference for the Bible.
• In text citations and
reference for the textbook
and other sources.
• Headings. • Reference
page.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Between 1 – 2
APA formatting
errors are
present in the
following: • In
text citations and
reference for the
Bible. • In text
citations and
reference for the
textbook and
other sources.
• Headings.
• Reference
page.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Between 3 – 4
APA formatting
errors are
present in the
following: • In
10. text citations and
reference for the
Bible. • In text
citations and
reference for the
textbook and
other sources.
• Headings.
• Reference
page.
0 pts
Not Present
More than 4 APA
formatting errors
are present; or the
APA format was not
followed.
5 pts
Biblical Integration Essay Grading Rubric |
BUSI643_B02_202130
Criteria Ratings Points
Mechanics,
Spelling and
Grammar
5 to >4.0 pts
11. Advanced
All of the following
provided without errors:
• Title/cover page. • All
pages typed in 12-point
Times New Roman fonts.
• All pages are
double-spaced. • All
pages have one-inch
margins on all four sides.
All of the following
provided • Correct
spelling. • Correct
grammar. • Correct
punctuation. • Correct
spacing.
4 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Between 1–2
errors are
present in the
following:
• Title/cover
page. • 12-point
Times New
Roman fonts. •
Double-spacing.
• One-inch
margins.
• Spelling.
• Grammar.
• Punctuation.
12. • Spacing.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Between 3–4
errors are
present in the
following:
• Title/cover
page. • 12-point
Times New
Roman fonts. •
Double-spacing.
• One-inch
margins.
• Spelling.
• Grammar.
• Punctuation.
• Spacing.
0 pts
Not Present
More than 4 errors
are present in the
following:
• Title/cover page.
• 12-point Times
New Roman fonts.
• Double-spacing.
• One-inch
margins. • Spelling.
• Grammar.
16. Well-constructed theories also serve other purposes. For
example, they help us understand why people choose
careers and then become dissatisfied with them. They
also allow us to interpret data about career development
that have been generated in the past, are being
generated in the present, and will be generated in the
future. Researchers and practitioners have long been
aware that children and adults sex-type careers and that
these stereotypes influence career choices. In
Chapter 4 , Gottfredson’s theory (1981, 2002) helps
us understand why this occurs. Well-developed theories
also help us account for all internal and external factors
that influence career development, including cognitions
about careers and affective responses to various career -
related events (Brown & Brooks, 1996; Krumboltz,
1994; Savickas, 2013). Well-constructed theories are
also parsimonious, which means that they are set forth
in the simplest, most succinct fashion necessary to
describe the phenomena involved. To summarize,
theories of career choice and development serve three
functions:
1. Facilitate the understanding of the forces that
influence career choice and development
2. Stimulate research that will help to better clarify
career choice and the development process
3. Provide a guide to practice in the absence of
empirical guidelines
file://view/books/9780133971798/epub/OPS/xhtml/fileP700049
5864000000000000000000B2E.html#P700049586400000000000
0000000B2E
39. Step One: Personal Awareness
What is my three letter Holland Code (SDS, SII, or other
inventory)?
What are my aptitudes and career-related skills
(inventory results or self-estimates; pp. 6, 7, & 9 of SDS or
GATB of Ability Profiler)?
What are my work and cultural values (prized beliefs
about occupations)?
Step Two: Occupational Awareness
What are the occupations that match my personality
type?
What are the occupations that I can perform well based
on my aptitudes (Occupations Finder Revised; O*NET or
DOD [2005 instruments])?
What are the occupations that will satisfy my work and
cultural values?
What is my list of attractive occupations? Are they
prioritized?
Step Three: Incorporating Educational Planning
What are the entry requirements (education, experience,
etc.) of the occupations of interest (the Education
Opportunities Finder)?