Criteria Ratings Points Executive Summary 8 to >6.0 pts Advanced • Provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents. • Contains enough information about the case study. • Captures the purpose and the main recommendation(s) in 1–2 sentences. • Provides key evidence for the major points. • Closes with a brief summary and rationale for the chosen strategy. 6 to >5.0 pts Proficient • Provides an overview of the paper’s contents. • Contains some information about the case study. • Captures most of the purpose and the main recommendation(s) in 1–2 sentences. • Provides most key evidence for the major points. • Closes with a brief summary that contains some rationale for the chosen strategy. 5 to >0.0 pts Developing • Provides a less than clear overview of the paper’s contents. • Lacking in information about the case study. • Captures some of the purpose and the main recommendation(s) in 1–2 sentences. • Provides some key evidence for the major points. • Brief summary and rationale are lacking in content for the chosen strategy. 0 pts Not Present 8 pts Alternative Strategies 10 to >8.0 pts Advanced Lists two or more alternative strategies (giving advantages and alternatives for each). 8 to >7.0 pts Proficient Lists 1 or more alternative strategies giving some advantages and alternatives for each. 7 to >0.0 pts Developing Lists less than 2 alternative strategies and gives a minimum amount of advantages and alternatives for each. 0 pts Not Present 10 pts Pro-Forma Financial Statements 30 to >26.0 pts Advanced • Includes and analyzes Pro-Forma Financial Statements (I/S, B/S and Statement of Cash Flows) with deltas out 3 years. • Each Pro-Forma year has 2 columns: 1 with strategy and 1 column without strategy. • Includes Pro-Forma ratios for the first year out with deltas contrasting from the 26 to >20.0 pts Proficient • Includes and analyzes Pro-Forma Financial Statements (I/S, B/S and Statement of Cash Flows) with deltas out 3 years with minor errors. • Each Pro-Forma year has 2 columns: 1 with strategy and 1 column without strategy, with 2-5 minor errors. • Includes most of the Pro-Forma ratios for the first year out with deltas contrasting from the most current year’s ratios. 20 to >0.0 pts Developing • Includes and analyzes Pro-Forma Financial Statements (I/S, B/S and Statement of Cash Flows) with deltas out 3 years. • Each Pro-Forma year has 2 columns: 1 with strategy and 1 without strategy, there are greater than 6 errors. • Includes some of the Pro-Forma ratios for the first year out with deltas contrasting from the most current year’s ratios. 0 pts Not Present 30 pts Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Grading Rubric | BUSI690_D04_202140 Criteria Ratings Points NPV and Cost Analysis 20 to >16.0 pts Advanced • Develops a ...

1. Criteria Ratings Points
Executive
Summary
8 to >6.0 pts
Advanced
• Provides a clear
overview of the
paper’s contents.
• Contains enough
information about the
case study.
• Captures the
purpose and the main
recommendation(s) in
1–2 sentences.
• Provides key
evidence for the
major points.
• Closes with a brief
summary and
rationale for the
chosen strategy.
6 to >5.0 pts
Proficient
• Provides an overview of

2. the paper’s contents.
• Contains some
information about the case
study. • Captures most of
the purpose and the main
recommendation(s) in 1–2
sentences. • Provides
most key evidence for the
major points. • Closes with
a brief summary that
contains some rationale for
the chosen strategy.
5 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Provides a less than
clear overview of the
paper’s contents.
• Lacking in information
about the case study.
• Captures some of the
purpose and the main
recommendation(s) in 1–2
sentences. • Provides
some key evidence for
the major points. • Brief
summary and rationale
are lacking in content for
the chosen strategy.
0 pts
Not
Present

3. 8 pts
Alternative
Strategies
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Lists two or more
alternative strategies
(giving advantages
and alternatives for
each).
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Lists 1 or more alternative
strategies giving some
advantages and
alternatives for each.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Lists less than 2
alternative strategies and
gives a minimum amount
of advantages and
alternatives for each.
0 pts

4. Not
Present
10 pts
Pro-Forma
Financial
Statements
30 to >26.0 pts
Advanced
• Includes and
analyzes Pro-Forma
Financial Statements
(I/S, B/S and
Statement of Cash
Flows) with deltas out
3 years. • Each
Pro-Forma year has 2
columns: 1 with
strategy and 1
column without
strategy. • Includes
Pro-Forma ratios for
the first year out with
deltas contrasting
from the
26 to >20.0 pts
Proficient
• Includes and analyzes

5. Pro-Forma Financial
Statements (I/S, B/S and
Statement of Cash Flows)
with deltas out 3 years with
minor errors. • Each
Pro-Forma year has 2
columns: 1 with strategy
and 1 column without
strategy, with 2-5 minor
errors. • Includes most of
the Pro-Forma ratios for
the first year out with deltas
contrasting from the most
current year’s ratios.
20 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Includes and analyzes
Pro-Forma Financial
Statements (I/S, B/S and
Statement of Cash Flows)
with deltas out 3 years.
• Each Pro-Forma year
has 2 columns: 1 with
strategy and 1 without
strategy, there are greater
than 6 errors. • Includes
some of the Pro-Forma
ratios for the first year out
with deltas contrasting
from the most current
year’s ratios.
0 pts

6. Not
Present
30 pts
Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Grading Rubric |
BUSI690_D04_202140
Criteria Ratings Points
NPV and Cost
Analysis
20 to >16.0 pts
Advanced
• Develops an NPV
figure/table. • Clearly
articulates the cost of
the strategy (-cf0).
• Clearly articulates
the subsequent
Pro-Forma cash
flows (cf) for the NPV
analysis.
• Thoroughly
analyzes the NPV.
16 to >11.0 pts
Proficient

7. • Develops an NPV
figure/table, some minor
errors. • Articulates the
cost of the strategy (-cf0).
• Articulates the
subsequent Pro-Forma
cash flows (cf) for the NPV
analysis. • Analyzes the
NPV.
11 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Develops an NPV
figure/table, calculation is
incorrect or missing key
components. • Discusses
but does not include
details of the cost of the
strategy (-cf0).
• Discusses the
Pro-Forma cash flows (cf)
for the NPV, lacks detail
and thoughtful analysis.
• Discusses the NPV,
analysis should be further
developed.
0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts

8. Implementation
of Strategic
Plan
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
• Includes an
actionable timetable
agenda for
accomplishing the
new strategy.
• Addresses the key
items of who, what,
how, and when of the
implementation
process.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
• Includes a timetable
agenda, with most details,
for accomplishing the new
strategy. • Addresses
most of the key items of
who, what, how, and when
of the implementation
process.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing

9. • Includes a basic
timetable agenda for
accomplishing the new
strategy, additional details
are needed. • Addresses
some of the key items of
who, what, how, and
when of the
implementation process.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Recommended
Strategies and
Objectives
20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
• Thoroughly
analyzes the new
strategy. • States and
discusses the cost to
implement the new
strategy. • Explains
the benefits of the
new strategy for long
term organizational
success. • Outlines
the challenges and/or

10. disadvantages of the
strategic choice.
17 to >15.0 pts
Proficient
• Analyzes the new
strategy. • States and
discusses the cost to
implement the new
strategy, minor details
missing. • Explains the
benefits of the new
strategy for long term
organizational success.
• Outlines the challenges
and/or disadvantages of
the strategic choice.
15 to >0.0 pts
Developing
• Thoroughly analyzes
the new strategy. • States
and discusses the cost to
implement the new
strategy, missing details.
• Explains the benefits of
the new strategy for long
term organizational
success. • Outlines the
challenges and/or
disadvantages of the
strategic choice.

11. 0 pts
Not
Present
20 pts
Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Grading Rubric |
BUSI690_D04_202140
Criteria Ratings Points
Grammar,
Spelling,
Format, and
References
42 to >35.0 pts
Advanced
Proper spelling and
grammar are used.
APA format including
a cover page,
citations and
references are
correct. Matrices
were included and
properly labeled.
35 to >30.0 pts

12. Proficient
Between 1–4 spelling,
grammar, format or citation
errors are present.
Matrices were mostly
included but there were a
few errors or missing a few
data items.
30 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Between 5–9 spelling,
grammar, format or
citation errors are present.
Some matrices were
included but there were
errors or missing data.
0 pts
Not
Present
More
than 10
spelling,
grammar,
format, or
citation
errors are
present.
42 pts

13. Total Points: 140
Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Grading Rubric |
BUSI690_D04_202140
Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Assignment
Instructions
Company: Domino’s Inc
Continue working on the individual case study started in Case
Study: Matrices Assignment of ABC Corporation. Complete this
portion of the case study: Case Study: Projections, NPV,
Compilation Assignment.
A formal, in-depth case study analysis requires you to utilize
the entire strategic management process. Assume your group is
a consulting team asked by the ABC Corporation to analyze its
external/internal environment and make strategic
recommendations. You must include exhibits to support your
analysis and recommendations.
Instructions
The completed case study must include these components, with
portions to be submitted over several modules as the Case
Study: Matrices Assignment, the Case Study: Historical
Financial Analysis Assignment, and the Case Study:
Projections, NPV, Compilation Assignment.
You will use the information completed in Case Study:
Matrices, and Case Study: Historical Financial Analysis as part
of your Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Assignment
final document.
**Your Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Assignment
paper must include:
1. Executive Summary – this should be no more than one page

14. and provide the reader with an overview of what will be
contained in the following pages. The problem and strategic
solution being recommended should be in this summary.
Details for the choice and implementation and data to support
the decision should be contained in the following sections.
2. Existing mission, objectives, and strategies
3. A new mission statement (include the number of the
component in parenthesis before addressing that component)
4. Analysis of the firm’s existing business model
5. SWOT Analysis
6. TOWS Matrix
7. Competitive forces analysis
8. Historical Financial Statements (Income Statement, Balance
Sheet, and Statement of Cash Flows) from the 3 most current
years for the firm
9. Historical Ratio Analysis
10. Competitors Ratio Analysis
11. Alternative strategies (giving advantages and disadvantages
for each). There should be at least two alternative strategies
identified and discussed.
12. Projected Financial Statements (Income Statement, Balance
Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows) for 3 years into the future.
This must be broken down by year into two (2) columns: 1
column without your strategy and 1 column with your strategy.
The without column should serve as the basis for your with
strategy column and only those financial statement accounts
that will be changed, based on your strategy, should be
impacted.
13. Include Projected ratios for the without and with strategy by
year. Discuss how these ratios compare and contrast with the
historical findings.
14. Cost Analysis completed on an Excel tab that outlines the
cost that will be incurred to implement the strategy. This
information should correspond with the With Strategy on the
Projected Financial Statements, linking of cells to the financial
statements is encouraged.

15. 15. Net Present Value analysis of proposed strategy’s new cash
flow – you may also use Excel to solve for this. From the
income statement the change in operating income between your
with and without strategy should serve as your cash inflow for
each year.
NOTE: To construct the first cash flow (cf1) the new revenue
from your strategy(s) must be discounted back to the present
value by calculating EBIT (Operating Income on the Income
Statement) and that figure will be your cfn for each year. cf0
(initial cost of your strategy), cf1 (discounted cash flow first
year), r (opportunity cost of capital, the rate of the next best
alternative use of cash/debt/equity resources).
a.
16. Implementation strategy – how and when will the strategy
be implemented, this should outline the who, how, what, and
when of the implementation process.
17. Specific recommended strategy and long term objectives
Explain why you chose the strategy, discuss the
advantages/benefits to organizational success and sustainability.
Incude a discussion of the challenges or disadvantages that may
arise as a result of the strategic choice.
18. Text must follow this order with current APA level headings
for each component.
Place the results of the case study analysis in a Word document
include matrices as appendices and a reference page. Submit a
separate Excel document for your Historical financials,
Projections, NPV, and Cost of the strategy.
Page 2 of 2