Top Rated Pune Call Girls Shirwal ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex Ser...
Criteria 2 Ppt New.pptx
1. Teaching Learning and Evaluation
Criterion No. 2 (Marks -350)
Progressive Education Society’s
MODERN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,
Yamunanagar, Nigdi
2. Key Indicator: 2.1
Student Enrollment and Profile
Criterion No. 2 (Marks -350)
Progressive Education Society’s
MODERN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,
Yamunanagar, Nigdi
3. Key Indicator: 2.1 – Student Enrollment and Profile (Marks 40)
Number of seats filled year wise during last five years (Only first
year admissions to be considered) (20)
Metric No.
2.1.1.1
2022-23 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 Avg. %
192 192 171 167 132 97.49
Metric No. 2.1.1.2 – Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years)
2022-23 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19
200 200 172 172 132
4. Key Indicator: 2.1 – Student Enrollment and Profile
Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year wise
during last five years (exclusive of supernumerary seats) (20)
Metric No.
2.1.2.1
Metric No. 2.1.2.2 – Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI/ State
Govt. rule year wise during the last five years
2022-23 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 Avg.%
93 78 70 62 34 91.53
2022-23 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19
80 80 70 70 54
5. Key Indicator: 2.2
Student Teacher Ratio
Criterion No. 2
Progressive Education Society’s
MODERN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,
Yamunanagar, Nigdi
6. Key Indicator: 2.2 – Student Teacher Ratio (Marks 40)
Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (2022-23) (40)
Metric No. 2.2.1 –
Metric No. 2.1.2.2 – Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI/ State
Govt. rule year wise during the last five years
Program Class No. of students
B. Pharm
First Year 111
Second Year 125
Third Year 125
Final Year 124
M. Pharm First Year 65
Second Year 60
Pharm D.
First Year 33
Second Year 30
Third Year 29
Fourth Year 38
Fifth Year 36
Total Number of Students 776
Total Number of full time teachers 47
Student : Full time teacher ratio 16.51
7. Key Indicator: 2.3
Teaching- Learning Process
Criterion No. 2
Progressive Education Society’s
MODERN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,
Yamunanagar, Nigdi
8. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process (Marks 40)
Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning
and problem-solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning
experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources
for effective teaching and learning process (40)
Metric No.
2.3.1
Experiential Learning Participative Learning
Problem Solving
Learning
Additional Initiatives
Student Centric
Methods
9. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Experiential Learning
Strategies
Adopted
Industrial
Projects
Seminars/
Conferences/
Workshops
Hands on
Training
Industrial
Training
Industrial
Visits
Hospital Visits
10. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Experiential Learning - Industrial Visits
Metric No. 2.1.2.2 –
A. Y. No. of
visits
Industries Associated
2022-23 07 Bio Radius Therapeutic Research Pvt. Ltd .
PhaseI, Hinjawadi, Pune
Chakan LifeSciences Pvt. Ltd, Pirangut, MIDC,
Maharashtra
Haffkine, Bio- Pharmaceutical Corporation, Ltd,
Pimpri, Pune
ICAR National Research Centre for Grapes,
Manjari, Hadpsar, Pune
MAGS- IARTC, Research and Training Pvt., Ltd.
MIDC Bhosari, Pune
Anchrom Enterprises(I)Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
Vishwa Connectome Pvt.Ltd, Hadapsar, Pune
Omni Protect Drugs,Pvt. Ltd, Bhosari, Pune
2021-22 06
2020-21 Nil*
2019-20 03
2018-19 03
Total 19
* Due to Covid-19 pandemic
11. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Experiential Learning - Industrial Training
A. Y. Number of Students Major Industries Associated
2022-23 108 Cipla Ltd
Sun Pharmaceuticals
Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical
Lupin Ltd
Nulife Pharmaceutical Ltd
Flamingo Pharmaceutical Ltd
Emcure Pharmaceuticals
Gennova Biopharmaceuticals
Sydler Remedies
Callidus Research Laboratories
Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited
2021-22 56
2020-21 64
2019-20 61
2018-19 64
Total 353
12. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Experiential Learning - Industrial Projects
A.Y. Projects
completed
Industries Associated
2022-23 05 CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory Pune
CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology
Hyderabad.
Anasyn Lab. Pvt. Ltd. Tathawade, Pune
Zenvision Pharma, Navi Mumbai
Callidus Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd, Pune
Zuventus Pvt. Ltd., Pune
Sava Healthcare Limited, Pune
Cipla, Mumbai
Emcure Pharmaceuticals Pune
2021-22 04
2020-21 02
2019-20 Nil*
2018-19 09
Total 20
* Due to Covid-19 pandemic
13. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Experiential Learning - Hospital Visits
A. Y. Class Number of Hospital Visits
2022-23 Fifth Year Pharm D 171
Fourth Year Pharm D 33
Third Year Pharm D 35
Second Year Pharm D 27
2021-22 Fourth Year Pharm D 12
Third Year Pharm D 11
Second Year Pharm D 11
2020-21 Third Year Pharm D Nil*
Second Year Pharm D Nil*
2019-20 Second Year Pharm D 11
* Due to Covid-19 pandemic
14. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Experiential Learning - Hands on Training
Metric No. 2.1.2.2 –
List of Equipments
HPLC & HPTLC Fluorescence microscope
R & D Coater Rotary Evaporator
Texture Analyzer Brookfield Viscometer
UV-Visible Spectrophotometer Horiba Particle Size Analyzer & Zeta Sizer
Autoanalyzer Parallel Synthesizer
Spray Dryer Hot Melt Extrusion
Cooling Centrifuge Tablet Punching Machine
Neuropharmacology Laboratory
15. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Experiential Learning - Seminars, Conferences and Workshops
Metric No. 2.1.2.2 –
A.Y. No. of students
benefited
Seminars/Conferences/Workshops Exposure
2022-23 55 International Conference at BITS-Pilani KK Birla, Goa
Campus
International Conference at Gosavi College of
Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Nashik
Indian Pharmaceutical Congress held at Nagpur
International Virtual Conference held at M.J. College,
Jalgaon
National workshop held at D. S. T. S. Mandal's College of
Pharmacy, Solapur
8th International Congress of the Society for
Ethnopharmacology-India held at Poona College of
Pharmacy, Pune
International E-conference held at Dayanand College of
Pharmacy, Latur
State level workshop at DYP institute, Pimpri, Pune
2021-22 65
2020-21 19
2019-20 14
2018-19 09
Total 162
No. of
conferences
attended
42
16. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Participative Learning
Metric No. 2.1.2.2 –
• Industrial Personnel and Academician
• Career Guidance
• Competitive Examination
Guest Lectures
• National Pharmacy Week (NPW)
• Seminars, Conferences and
Workshops (Inhouse)
Co-curricular
Activities
• National Service Scheme (NSS)
Medical Services
Provided
Strategies Adopted
20. Medical Services Provided by Students
Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Participative Learning
A.Y. No. of Services
Provided
Medical Services
2022-23 3 Blood Donation Camp
Hemoglobin checkup & ABHA card – drive
Distribution of sanitary napkins and counseling
regarding the same
AIDS Day Awareness
Pulse polio vaccination campaign
SPPU COVID warriors Training
Jan Andolan COVID appropriate behavior campaign
Medicine & Glossary Donation to needy Hansen’s
disease (laprosy) people at Anand Ashram, Alandi
Health Check Up camp
2021-22 4
2020-21 5
2019-20 5
2018-19 4
Total 21
21. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Problem Solving Learning
Metric No. .1.2.2 –
Research Projects
B.Pharm
M.Pharm
Hospital Related Projects
Pharm D
NPTEL Courses Case Studies
Strategies
Adopted
22. Problem Solving Learning- Research Projects (333)
Research Projects (UG) - 120
Metric No. .1.2.2 –
Academic Year Projects completed
2022-23 48
2021-22 38
2020-21 13
2019-20 15
2018-19 06
Research Projects (PG) - 204
Academic Year Projects completed
2022-23 60
2021-22 39
2020-21 36
2019-20 35
2018-19 34
23. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Problem Solving Learning
Metric No. .1.2.2 –
Case Studies (Pharm D) - 150
Research Projects (Pharm D) - 09
Academic Year Case Studies Completed
2022-23 81
2021-22 56
2020-21 Nil*
2019-20 13
2018-19 NA
*Due to Covid-19 pandemic
24. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Problem Solving Learning- NPTEL Courses
Metric No. .1.2.2 –
Academic Year Students Enrolled Students Benefited
2022-23 33 33
2021-22 28 28
2020-21 Nil* Nil*
2019-20 20 20
2018-19 20 20
Total Students Benefited 101
Total no. of Courses 13
* No enrollment due to Covid-19 pandemic
25. Additional Initiatives
ICT Tools
Metric No. .1.2.2 – ICT Tools
Smart
Classroom
Zoom/Goog
le Platform
LMS
Vm-Edulife
E-Library
QR – coding
Softwares
TV Sets in
Labs
You tube
videos
26. Additional Initiatives
Self-Learning Resources
Internet
facility and
WiFI
Books, E-
books
Journals, E-
Journals
Audio and
Video CDs
Computer
laboratory
Language lab
TV Sets in labs
Question
banks
Printed
materials-
Handouts
Departmental
library
Lab manuals
Educational
CDs
You-tube
videos by
Faculty
Softwares
QR coding
Role play /
Peer
Discussion
NPTEL
learning
modules
Industrial
visits
LMS
VM edulife
Industrial
training
Museum
Zoom /Google
Platforms
Rare
publications
Herbarium
Seed bank
E-Library
Smart
Classroom
Installation
guides and
CDs
SOPs
Charts/models
/Miniatures
27. Additional Initiatives
Pedagogical Initiatives
Metric No. .1.2.2 –
Virtual
Learning
MCQ,
Flash Cards
Designing
Learning
Charts
3D model for
Stereochemistry
Collaborative
Learning
Flipped
Classroom
Experiential
Learning
Survey Based
Assignments
ICT-enabled
Learning
Ethical
Learning
Blended
Learning
Content Delivery
Through
Animated
Videos
Mind Map
Method
Quick Review
Method
Development
of Scientific
Models
Projects Based
Learning
Creative
Learning
Flexible
Molecular
Based Learning
Self-
Learning
Graphical
Abstract
Designing
28. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Outcome – Teaching Learning Process
Metric No. .1.2.2 –
Nikhil Gabhale- 2 Gold Medals
1. Late Dr. Shivram alias Gopalkrishna Bhadbhade
Laxmeshwar Gold Medal –
For First amongst all candidates with 'O'
Grade in M.Pharmacy.
2. Prof. Dr. Shivajirao Kadam Gold Medal
For highest amongst all candidates with 'O'
Grade in M Pharmacy.
Achievements of Students
29. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Outcome – Teaching Learning Process
Metric No. .1.2.2 –
Achievements of Students
30. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
Outcome of Teaching Learning Process - Rankers
Sr.
no. Name of Candidate Rank Course
Academic
year
1
Ms. Kulkarni
AkshataMalhari
2nd M. Pharmacy June 2016
2 Nikhil Kisan Gabhale
1st
Gold
Medal
M. Pharmacy April 2020
3 Mahajan Arun Shubhash 2nd
M. Pharmacy
(Pharmaceutics)
April 2020
4 Divase shraddha Anil 7th
M. Pharmacy
(Pharmaceutical
Chemistry)
April 2020
5
Vijapure Pandurang
Shivraj
7th
M. Pharmacy
(Pharmaceutical
Chemistry)
April 2021
Year wise University Rankers (M.Pharm)
31. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
Outcome of Teaching Learning Process - Rankers
32. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Outcome – Teaching Learning Process
Metric No. .1.2.2 –
Achievements of Students
Best Presentation Awards
Best Young Innovative Awards
International Conference held at Chennai
33. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Outcome - Teaching Learning Process
A. Y. Number of Students Placed
2022-23 45
2021-22 76
2020-21 57
2019-20 Nil*
2018-19 50
Total 228
Placement Details
*Due to Covid-19 pandemic
34. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Outcome - Teaching Learning Process
A. Y. Number of Students Admitted
2022-23 19
2021-22 18
2020-21 22
2019-20
26
2018-19 25
Total 110
Students Admitted for Higher Study
35. Key Indicator: 2.3 – Teaching Learning Process
Outcome – Teaching Learning Process
A. Y. No. of MOUs
2022-23 05
2021-22 03
2020-21 Nil*
2019-20 03
2018-19 02
Total 13
Summary of MOUs
*Due to Covid-19 pandemic
36. Key Indicator: 2.4
Teacher Profile and Quality
Criterion No. 2
Progressive Education Society’s
MODERN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,
Yamunanagar, Nigdi
37. Key Indicator: 2.4 – Teacher Profile and Quality (Marks 40)
Metric No. 2.4.1.1 – Number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years (15)
2022-23 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19
42 36 33 27 26
Metric No. 2.4.2.1 – Number of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET /Ph. D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./L.L.D year
wise during the last five years (25)
2022-23 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 Avg.%
22 19 19 20 19 59.17
38. Key Indicator: 2.5
Evaluation Process and Reforms
Criterion No. 2
Progressive Education Society’s
MODERN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,
Yamunanagar, Nigdi
39. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms (Marks 40)
Internal Assessment - 2018 & 2019 PCI Pattern (B. Pharm. & M. Pharm.)
2013 Pattern (Pharm. D.)
Metric No. .1.2.2 –
SOP for conduct of Examination
(Sessional Theory and Practical)
Display of College Examination Schedule
For Theory Examination
Display of Timetable, Hall Arrangements and Rules for Conduct of Examination
For Practical Examination
Display of Commencement Dates
Conduction of Internal Examination
40. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms (Marks 40)
Internal Assessment - 2018 & 2019 PCI Pattern (B. Pharm. & M. Pharm.)
2013 Pattern (Pharm. D.)
Metric No. .1.2.2 –
Course Internal Assessment Marks Total
Continuous
Mode
Sessional
Exams
B. Pharm. (T) 10 15 25
B. Pharm. (P) 5 10 15
M. Pharm. (T) 10 15 25
M. Pharm. (P) 20 30 50
Pharm. D. (T) --- 30 30
Pharm. D. (P) --- 30 30
41. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
B. Pharmacy 2019 PCI Pattern Internal Examination
Theory Practical
2 2
Sessional Exams
30 Marks 40 Marks
I. Objective Type Questions (Answer 05 out of 7)
=5 x 2 = 10
II. Long Answers (Answer 1 out of 2) =1 x 10 = 10
III. Short Answers (Answer 2 out of 3) =2 x 5 = 10
Total - 30 marks
For subjects having University exams
For subjects having Non-University Examination
I. Long Answers (Answer 1 out of 2) =1 x 10 = 10
II. Short Answers (Answer 4 out of 6) =4 x 5 = 20
Total - 30 marks
I. Synopsis = 10
II. Experiments = 25
III. Viva voce = 05
Total - 40 marks
Sessional exam shall be conducted for 30
marks for theory and computed for 15
marks. Similarly Sessional exam for practical
shall be conducted for 40 marks and
computed for 10 marks. The average marks
of two sessional exams will be computed for
internal assessment .
42. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
M. Pharmacy 2019 PCI Pattern Internal Examination
Theory Practical
2 2
Sessional Exams
30 Marks 30 Marks
I. Objective Type questions
(solve 5 out of 7) 5 X 2=10
II. Short answer questions
(solve 2 out of 3) 2 X 5=10
III. Long answer questions
(solve 1 out of 2) 1 X 10=10
Total 30 marks
I. Synopsis = 05
II. Experiments = 20
III. Viva voce = 05
Total 30 marks
Sessional exam will be conducted for 30
marks and computed for 15 marks.
Average marks of two sessional exams
will be computed for internal
assessment .
43. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
Mechanism of Internal Examination Related Grievances
Respective faculty shows assessed answer sheets to students for any grievances
and doubt
Grievance related to Transparent Assessment
If any issue faculty solves it
immediately
If no issue- students sign on the
answer sheets as seen for
transparent assessment system
Students sign on the answer
sheets as seen for transparent
assessment system
Respective faculty displays the
subject wise final mark list on
notice board and also get it signed
by students before sending the
marks to the university
44. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
Mechanism of Internal Examination Related Grievances
Students if remain absent for Sessional Examination due to valid reason, they
give application with prior sign of subject in charge & class teacher at Exam
Section for Improvement/ Re-sessional with required documents
Re-sessional/ Improvement related Grievance
After cross checking the validity of reason & documents, applications are
forwarded to Principal
If needed, re-sessional/ improvement examination is conducted before end
semester examination and its record is maintained at mother register
45. Mechanism of Internal Examination Related Grievances
External Assessment- SOP for conduct of Exam (University Theory and Practical)
Display of University Examination Schedule for Online Filling of Forms and Last date for Acceptance of Forms
Showing of Marks Entry Register and Confirmation by Students Signature Prior to Sending to University.
After Conduct of Internal Exam
Receiving Queries, Doubts and Problems in the Marks Entry in Form of Application Within 2 Days and
Rectification of the Same From Respective Staff and Recommunication to Students
After Receipt of University Timetable for
Theory and Practical Commencement and
End Dates
For Practical Exam- Display of Practical Timetable with Details of Batches
For Theory Exam- Display of Timetable, Hall Arrangements and Rules for Conduct of Exam.
Distribution of Hall Tickets
Conduct of Exam
46. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
Mechanism of External Assessment
B. Pharmacy 2019 PCI Pattern External Examination
Theory (75 Marks) Practical (35 Marks)
For 75 Marks paper (University Exam)
I. Objective Type Question (Answer 5 out of 7)=5x3=15
II. Long Answer (Answer 2 out of 4)=2x10=20
III. Short Answers (Answer 8 out of 10)=8x5=40
For 50 Marks paper (Non-University Exam)
I. Long Answer (Answer 2 out of 3)=2x10=20
II. Short Answers (Answer 6 out of 8)=6x5=30
For 35 Marks paper (Non-University Exam)
I. Long Answer (Answer 1 out of 2)=1x10=10
II. Short Answers (Answer 5 out of 7)=5x5=25
I. Synopsis=5
II. Experiments=25
III. Viva Voce=05
Total=35 Marks
Project Work
Evaluation of Dissertation Book:
I. Objective(s) of the work done=15
II. Methodology adopted=20
III. Result and Discussions=20
IV. Conclusions and Outcomes=20
Total=75 Marks
Evaluation of presentation:
I. Presentation Work=25
II. Communication Skills=20
III. Question and Answer Skill=30
Total=75 Marks
47. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
Mechanism of External Assessment
M. Pharmacy 2019 PCI Pattern External Examination
Theory (75 Marks) Practical (100 Marks)
For 75 Marks paper (University Exam)
I. Long Answer (Solve 1 out of 2)=1x15=15
II. Medium Length answers (Solve 2 out of 4)=2x7.5=15
III. Short Answers (Solve 3 out of 5)=3x5=15
IV. Long answer questions (Solve 1 out of 2)=1x15=15
V. Short notes (Solve 3 out of 5)=3x5=15
Total=75 Marks
I. Synopsis=15
II. Experiments=70
III. Viva Voce=15
Total=100 Marks
Project Work
Evaluation of Dissertation Book:
I. Objective(s) of the work done=50
II. Methodology adopted=150
III. Result and Discussions=250
IV. Conclusions and Outcomes=50
Total=500 Marks
Evaluation of presentation:
I. Presentation Work=100
II. Communication Skills=50
III. Question and Answer Skill=100
Total=250 Marks
48. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
Mechanism of External Examination Related Grievances
Student Application
Regarding Hall Tickets/Exam Form/ Marks Entry/ Photocopy/ Revaluation Form/
Result/ Marksheet
Investigation and Communication
Discussion on queries with respective authorities & Queries conveyed to
university within 2 days by telephonically or through web-mail or by physically.
University Process
Verification and action taken by university authorities & resolution
communicated to college by respective channel.
Decisions Communication to Students
Resolved Grievances Communicated to Students
Feedback
Resolved Grievances Verified by Students
49. Key Indicator: 2.6
Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Criterion No. 2
Progressive Education Society’s
MODERN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,
Yamunanagar, Nigdi
50. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (Marks 90)
Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all
Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed
on website (45)
The course outcomes (COs) were prepared for each course (subject) by taking
into consideration-
Curriculum given by Savitribai Phule Pune University
Vision and Mission statement of the institute
PEO’s and program outcomes envisaged by NBA
Metric No.
2.6.1
51. Following are the steps involved in the Desired CO-PO mapping
Every Course Unit mapped with Every CO
Every Course Unit mapped with Every PO
Actual number of hours allocated to units of syllabus considered
Determination of number of contact hours for specific CO
Calculation of percentage number of contact hours given for Specific PO
Get the % CO-PO Correlation
CO-PO mapping strength i.e. Low- 1, Medium- 2, Strong- 3 considered
Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all
Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed
on website (45)
Metric No.
2.6.1
52. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Attainment of COs
Components
Theory Practical
Continuous
evaluation
Sessional Exam
Continuous
evaluation
Sessional Exam
Definition,
illustrations with
example, short
notes and
descriptive essay
for each courses
Assignment, class
test, seminars,
project, case
studies, open book
test, online
examination.
Synopsis, Major
and Minor
Experiment, Viva-
voce
Technical skill,
Observational skill,
Reporting and
interpretative skill,
Miscellaneous
(Attendance, Journal,
Attitude and behavior
Cleanliness of work
place)
53. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Rubrics for CO attainment
CO
attainment
Level 1: 50% students scoring
more than 50% marks in the
internal sessional examination/
University End Examination is
considered to be attainment of
“1”
Level 2: 60% students scoring
more than 50% marks in the
internal sessional examination/
University End Examination is
considered to be attainment of
“2”
Level 3: 80% students scoring
more than 50% marks in the
internal sessional examination/
University End Examination is
considered to be attainment of
“3”
54. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Metric No. 2.6.2 – Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated (45)
CO
Attainment
Level 1: If 50%-60% of students
scoring more than or equal to
50% of marks in internal
examinations and University
end examinations - Attainment
level “1” considered.
Level 2: If 60%-70% of students
scoring more than or equal to
50% of marks in internal
examinations and University
end examinations- Attainment
level “2” considered.
Level 3: If more than 70% of
students scoring more than or
equal to 50% of marks in
internal exam & University end
examinations - Attainment level
“3” considered.
55. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Indirect Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated (45)
Types of
Feedback
Mechanisms
Course
End
Survey
Alumni
Survey
Employer
Survey
Parent
Feedback
Survey
The final PO attainment is
derived from 80% of direct
assessment tools and 20%
of indirect assessment tools
for each year.
56. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Desired Vs Actual CO Attainment
B. Pharmacy
Desired CO Attainment Actual CO Attainment
57. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
Desired Vs Final PO Attainment
(2018-19) B. Pharmacy
Desired PO Attainment Final PO Attainment
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
Desired Vs Final PO Attainment
(2019-20) B. Pharmacy
Desired PO Attainment Final PO Attainment
58. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
Desired Vs Final PO Attainment
(2020-21) B. Pharmacy
Desired PO Attainment Final PO Attainment
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
Desired Vs Final PO Attainment
(2021-22) B. Pharmacy
Desired PO Attainment Final PO Attainment
59. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
Desired Vs Final PO Attainment (2022-23) B. Pharmacy
Desired PO Attainment Final PO Attainment
60. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
Year-wise Final % of PO Attainment B. Pharmacy
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
61. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Desired Vs Actual CO Attainment
M Pharmacy (Pharmaceutics)
Desired CO Attainment Actual CO Attainment
80
85
90
95
100
105
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10
Year-wise Final % of PO Attainment M.
Pharmacy (Pharmaceutics)
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
62. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Desired Vs Actual CO Attainment M. Pharmacy
(Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance)
Desired CO Attainment Actual CO Attainment
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11
Year-wise Final % of PO Attainment M.
Pharmacy (Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance)
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
63. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Desired Vs Actual CO Attainment
M Pharmacy (Pharmaceutical Chemistry)
Desired CO Attainment Actual CO Attainment
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10
Year-wise Final % of PO Attainment M.
Pharmacy (Pharmaceutical Chemistry)
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
64. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3
3.1
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Desired Vs Actual CO Attainment
M Pharmacy (Pharmacology)
Desired CO Attainment Actual CO Attainment
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8
Year-wise Final % of PO Attainment M.
Pharmacy (Pharmacology)
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
65. Key Indicator: 2.6 – Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
Metric No. 2.6.3 – Pass % of Students during last 5 Years
Year Program Number of students
appeared in the final
year examination
Number of students
passed in final year
examination
Pass % Students during
last 5 years
2022-23 B. PHARM 124 110 88.70
M. PHARM 60 60 100
2021-22 B. PHARM 69 62 89.85
M. PHARM 45 44 98.99
2020-21 B. PHARM 64 64 100
M. PHARM 42 42 100
2019-20 B. PHARM 65 65 100
M. PHARM 40 40 100
2018-19 B. PHARM 65 64 98.46
M. PHARM 36 33 91.67
B. Pharm Avg - 95.41 M Pharm Avg- 80.13 Total Avg- 86.77
Note: For Pharm D. course data template is not applicable
66. Key Indicator: 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms
Outcome of Teaching Learning Process - Rankers
67. Key Indicator: 2.7
Student Satisfactory Survey
Criterion No. 2
Progressive Education Society’s
MODERN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY,
Yamunanagar, Nigdi