Student's name, grade, section, and teacher are provided. A rubric is included to evaluate students on subject knowledge, organization, use of graphics/visual aids, mechanics and length of presentation, and voice/presentation skills. The rubric contains criteria and scores to assess student performance in each category on a scale from 1 to 20.

1. CREATIVE WRITING
QUARTER 2
REPORTING ACTIVITY (PERFORMANCE)
DATE OF REPORT:
TEACHER’S SIGNATURE:
Name of the Reporter: Grade and Section: Teacher: Ms, Aira Jane V. Villa
RUBRICS
Criteria 20 – 17 16 – 11 10 – 5 5 – 1 Score
Subject Knowledge
Student demonstrates full
knowledge (more than
required) by answering all
class questions with
explanations and
elaboration.
Student is at ease with
expected answers to all
questions, but fails to
elaborate.
Student is uncomfortable with
information and is able to
answer only rudimentary
questions.
Student does not have grasp of
information; student cannot answer
questions about subject.
Organization
Student presents
information in logical,
interesting sequence which
audience can follow.
Student presents
information in logical
sequence which audience
can follow.
Audience has difficulty
following presentation because
student jumps around.
Audience cannot understand
presentation because there is no
sequence of information.
Graphics/ Visual Aids
Student's graphics explain
and reinforce screen text
and presentation.
Student's graphics relate to
text and presentation.
Student occasionally uses
graphics that rarely support text
and presentation.
Student uses superfluous graphics
or no graphics
Mechanics & Length
Presentation has no
misspellings or
grammatical errors.
Presentation was within
specified length.
Presentation has no more
than two misspellings and/or
grammatical errors.
Presentation was 1-2
minutes over or under
specified length.
Presentation has three
misspellings and/or grammatical
errors. Presentation was 3-4
minutes over or under specified
length.
Student's presentation has four or
more spelling errors and/or
grammatical errors. Presentation
was 5 minutes over specified
length.
Voice/ Presentation
Student 's voice was loud
and clear. Information was
easy to understand.
Voice is good with minimal
gaps in flow of information
Voice is acceptable - many gaps
in flow of information or times
voice could not be understood by
all.
Students did not speak in a tone
that could be heard by all students
- too soft. Information too hard to
understand.
TOTAL