Creationism Vs Evolution Essay

Creationism Vs. Evolution Essay
While the theory of evolution is very commonly accepted amongst most scholars and intellectuals,
when the scientific facts used to 'support' it are closely examined, it becomes apparent that it is
merely that: a theory. Inaccurate information, misguided philosophers, and in some cases, just plain
ignorance, have all contributed to this 'scientific religion' that does nothing but lead people away
from the true nature of our existence, the Genesis creation. The creation 'story' is much more than
just a story, it is a scientifically provable fact, and one that should be treated as more than just a
parable or story, as the Word of God is pure and the absolute truth. One of the first major pillars of the
evolution theory that falls away...show more content...
(Slichter) Second, the earth has a magnetic field surrounding it, which is weakening at a rate of 5%
of its present total every hundred years. At the present time, the earth's magnetic field is only one
third as strong as it was when Jesus walked the earth. With the deterioration of that field being so
relatively rapid, if the earth were actually 4 billion years old, such a field would no longer exist,
and so much harmful radiation would have hit the surface that life as we know it could not exist.
(Hovind) Finally, the rotation of the earth is slowing down at a rate of one thousandth of a
second per day. While that doesn't seem like much, only one second per millennia, in one billion
years, it adds up to one million seconds, or 227 hours. At that rate of rotation, the centrifugal force
on the earth would have torn it apart. (Hovind) Another scientific method that evolutionists use to
back up their theory is the use of carbon dating to determine the age of ancient fossils. Using this
method, scientists place an age of millions of years on dinosaur bones and the like. However, this
method, while very accurate, to a point, would have been thrown off completely be the worldwide
flood that took place in the book of Genesis. The flood would have uprooted and buried pre–flood
forests,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Evolution vs. Creationism Essay
Evolution vs. Creationism
The Evolution vs. Creationism controversy goes all the way back to the Publishing of Origin of
Species in 1859 by Darwin laying the foundation for the evolution of life to be understood. Scientists
are continuously finding more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; that organisms descended
from a common ancestor modified by the mechanism of natural selection resulting in the evolution
of species adapting to their environment. The following are the main geological topics concerning
creationism: radiometric dating, transitional forms and the Cambrian explosion. Creationism is
nothing more than a child's fairytale that lacks any scientific proof.
The aspect of radiometric dating is controversial to most...show more content...
Plus or minus a couple million years has a negligible effect on the results attempting to be obtained.
Radiometric dating consistently prove from analysis of bolide fragments that the earth is about 4.6
billion years old and once again disproving the Bible's 6,000 years. The problem for creationism is
that they can't prove there 'fairytale' correct because it's based on little fact, so they attempt to make
the other valid ideas sound ridiculous. Therefore, creationism attempts to prove radiometric dating
incorrect and is nothing more than a feeble attempt to bring credibility to there own ideas and beliefs.
Secondly, a once thought problem with evolution was the lack of transitional phases in the fossil
record. For example it was once thought there were no transitional phases between birds and reptiles;
this has now been proven false by paleontologists. Archaeopteryx has distinctive avian characteristics
including a wishbone, a bony sternum and feathers (Geology). Several of its reptilian characteristics
include unfused metacarpal bones, a long bony tail and three well developed fingers. What is also
interesting is that archaeopteryx lived at the same time as the dinosaurs. Again, it seems as if
creationists randomly start making assumptions in an attempt to slander other valid theories rather
than proving there's correct (even thought that's impossible). "If evolution were true, there would be
more transitional

Evolution Vs. Creationism Essay
Abstract
In the history of science vs. religion there have been no issues more intensely debated than
evolution vs. creationism. The issue is passionately debated since the majority of evidence is in
favor of evolution, but the creation point of view can never be proved wrong because of religious
belief. Human creation breaks down into three simple beliefs; creation theory, naturalistic evolution
theory, and theistic evolution theory. The complexities of all three sides create a dilemma for what
theory to support among all people, religious and non–religious.
The theories of human evolution may always cause a heated dispute. Each theory presents its own
evidence proving...show more content...
Until science proves its naturalistic theory correct, the world will have to choose between the three
theories based on personal beliefs, religious values, and scientific information.
The creation theory includes over 500 different creation stories based on numerous religions
(Religious Tolerance, 2004). The vast number of stories creates strains on which evolution story is
accurate. Christians that are creationists take the bible literally and believe the earth is around
10,000 years old. The creation theory will always exist with religion, so the creation theory can
never be proved wrong since it is simply a religious belief. Religion is still very important in the
United States, and the acceptance of the naturalization theory would completely change Christianity
all together. Religious Tolerance, a website that outlays the conflict of evolution vs. creationism,
explains how naturalism would shake Christianity. Religious tolerance states that the acceptance of
evolution would make people interpret Genesis symbolically and classify evolution stories as
myths. Since the creation stories are closely tied to the fall of man and to original sin, the entire
role of Jesus would change. Without original sin, there would be no need for a savior, and
Christianity would change drastically. This further proves that the creation theory will live as long
as religion. The Gallup Organization studies what percentages of Americans believe in each of

Creationism vs. Evolution Essay
Creationism is the theory that man, the earth, and the rest of the universe was originally created
rather than randomly exploding from nothingness into chance existence. We reside on the surface of
a small superbly crafted, autonomous self regulating space vehicle. Together with survival, conquest
and death we bear witness to beauty, fragrances, love and music. Think about this. Mathematics,
philosophy, springtime, depravity, farming, courtship, quasars, and iphones; all came from
nothingness?, formed by chance......?
Of all the generations thus far to inhabit the Earth, we have the least excuse for not recognizing the
quiet presence of The Scientific Mathematician who set everything into motion around us. We
should be in awe, not...show more content...
"And God said, let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit trees
yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: And it was so. "And the
earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding, fruit, whose
seed was in itself, after his kind; and God saw that it was good. "And the evening and the
morning were the third day.
"And God said let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the
night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years. "And let them be
for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light upon the earth; and it was so. "And
God made two great lights: The greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night: He
made the stars also. "And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the
earth. "And to rule over the day and over the night and to divide the light from the darkness:
and God saw that it was good. "And the evening, and the morning were the fourth day.
"And God said, let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath light, and
fowls that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. "And God created great
whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their
kind,

Essay on Evolution VS. Creationism
Since the beginning of the human race there has been a lingering question as to the origins of man
and how all living things acquired their characteristics. The two main theories that arose over time
were Creationism and Evolution, both of which provided very distinct answers to this question.
Creationism based its answer on the idea of a supernatural power or being that created the entire
universe, man and the numerous other organisms that live within it. While, Evolution theorizes that
all living things have the potential to change and grow over time into something new and different.
So in other words, one theory suggests that humans and all the organisms on Earth are the result of
divine design, while the other indicates that they...show more content...
Every one of these flaws points out that the Creationists theory that the Earth, all of the organisms on
it, and everything that surrounds it has not changed or been altered since the flood is inaccurate.
Biogeography for example shows that "closely allied" species have a tendency to live on the "same
continent... or within the same group of oceanic islands... despite their species–by–species
preferences for different habitats, food source, [and] of conditions of climate" (Quammen 4). The
explanation for this is that "they descended from common ancestors" and this can be verified with
the paleontology flaw because that flaw deals with the fossils of plants and animals "that had
[either] become extinct or that still existed but in different forms" which indicates not only that
organisms have changed over time, but also provides evidence that "closely allied" organism have
lived in the same areas of centuries (Quammen 4; Parks 24). Then in the taxonomic classification
flaw these "closely allied" spices can be "systematically classified, according to their shared
similarities" which, suggests that "closely allied" organisms descended from common ancestor
because of the traits and similar organs that allows this type of classification (Quammen 5). The
presence of these similar traits and organs introduces the flaw of vestigial characteristics because
although some of these do not have any current

Evolution vs.Creationism Essay
Evolution Vs Creationism
People have always wondered how life originated and how so many different kinds of plants and
animals arose. Stories of a supernatural creation of life developed among many peoples. The Bible,
for example, tells of God's creation of humans and other higher animals over several days. Many
people also believed that insects, worms, and other lower creatures spontaneously generated from
mud and decay. Long after these stories became rooted in tradition, scientists began to question them.
Albert Einstein said, "The scientist's religious feeling takes the form of a rapturous amazement
at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with
it, all the systematic...show more content...
All organisms can be traced back to a common ancestor from inanimate matter. Charles Darwin
once said, "When I view all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants of
some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Cambrian system was deposited, they
seem to me to become ennobled." (Darwin)
Creationists believe in a divine creator, God. Creationism has a broad range of beliefs involving a
reliance on God's miraculous work to explain the origin of the universe, of life, and of the different
kinds of plants and animals on Earth. According to the creationist view, God willed everything into
existence, and this is how humans came onto the Earth. Creationists say that the evolution theory is
biased and incomplete. They believe that the fossil records fail to provide a link between diverse
groups. To find out how old fossils are, scientists use a method called radioisotope dating, which
measures the amount of uranium or lead lost over the years.
Two decades after Darwin's Origin of Species was published many religious leaders feared that a
less–than–literal reading of the biblical story would result in a loss of faith; and well–known
spokesmen for the cause–such as William Jennings Bryan– of moral decay to be evidence of the
damage brought about by the teaching of the godless evolution. The issue was argued on a number
of platforms, one of the most famous being the Scopes Trial (1925), in which a high school

Evolution Vs. Creationism
Just as there are two sides to every story, there are two major sides to the story that is our Earth's
history. An ever–clashing "battle", so to speak, between a religious and evolutionary outlook
continues exist as a heated dispute. One side contains the scientific community which mainly uses
proof of evolution to explain our upbringing, while the other side lies the creationists– those who
believe in the use of biblical means and an intelligent ruler for explanation. Regardless of
controversial turmoil, I believe that the two standpoints of Evolution and Creationism may coexist to
explain our creation. For as long as we've been around to ponder, the question of how we "got here",
or even how we were "made" has always existed. In terms of...show more content...
However, there is an "in–between" belief, known as Intelligent Design. Intelligent design not only
agrees with science but considers religious involvement; the term caters to both beliefs
harmonically. Stating the acceptation of evolution to create our species on this planet, creationism
is accepted in the belief that some things were possibly guided by an intelligent being, supernatural
force, or God, in order to create a successful complexity. (Betty Stafford) Considering the standpoint
of IT's belief, it is the perfect view for anyone with an open–minded outlook, which of whom does
not believe in an definite explanation for our upbringing. Although in partial agreement with the
scientific community, IT disapproves of the Darwinist theory. This theory believes in "lucky genetic
accidents" in terms of natural selection, meaning that while Darwinism presumes that natural
selection did create our complexity, these "lucky accidents" were not based on just luck and chance.
(Betty Stafford) Intelligent design concludes that such accidents were actually decisions that may
have been made by our intelligent creator or God. (Betty Stafford) Within Intelligent Design's the
position, the two beliefs of evolution and creationism exist in perfect inclusion in the fact that not
one theory is more accepted than

Essay about Creationism vs. Evolution
"Life has no meaning. Jesus gives our life meaning, we must accept him to give meaning to our life.
It futile to ask about the meaning of life when you are the answer."
вЂ• Rob Geis
Creationism and the study of evolution has been a controversial debate for decades now, leaving
many people on one side or the other. Creationism argues that faith should take precedent over
science, basing its beliefs on one book for guidance, the Bible. God created the earth and everything
on it, taking six days. Evolutionists believe that the earth is much older than the Bible describes, and
that plants, animals, and humans are a result of a natural progression called evolution. There were no
common ancestors (Adam and Eve) from whom we came; it...show more content...
In the span of six days, God created the heavens, the earth, the sun, moon, water, animals, and ended
with the finalГ© of human beings. Other major events such as Noah's flood occurred along the
lifespan of the earth, accounting for the distribution of fossils and the formation of the earth's
layers. St. Augustine of Hippo (who was raised a Christian and later became a member of the
Manicheans) believed that the Old Testament was nonsense. He "believed therefore that organic
forms were potentially in a kind of seed–form, and realized actually when the conditions were right–
when the seas appeared for instance"(Ruse, 51). Augustine believed that God created everything in
one move: conception, wish, and creation were all at the same time. This thinking was also a belief
held by Galileo later on in history.
Evolution is defined as "the development by natural causes of all organisms, those today and those
yesterday, from other forms probably ultimately much simpler and originally perhaps from
non–living substances"(Ruse, 12). According to evolutionists, the earth began approximately 4.5
billion years ago, with the explosion of life beginning around 55 million years ago. To evolutionists,
the starting of life began as inorganic molecules that underwent a natural transformation (through
electricity or heat) to become organic molecules. These building blocks joined to form
macromolecule chains that eventually made up organisms. The chains

Since the Age of the Enlightenment, the institution of religion has had to contend with the
opposition of science regarding the issues of the origins of the world and of the human species. Up
until around the end of the 17th century, the church was the authority on how the world and
everything in it had come to be. However, with the great intellectual revolution came thinkers such
as Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and many others who challenged the biblical assumptions
with empirically deduced scientific theories. The Catholic Church had a nasty habit of persecuting
such ideological dissent toward creationism, calling it heresy and thereby somewhat suppressing a
complete upheaval of the Scriptures. For many centuries to come,...show more content...
The representatives of the ACLU were willing to defend any person willing to face trial for
teaching the subject in schools in order to contest the law and bring its nature into the national
limelight. The town leaders of Dayton obliged, being glad for the opportunity of some publicity.
William Jennings Bryan represented the State of Tennessee and staked his claim saying that the State
of Tennessee "has already held that this act is constitutional, it being the law of the land, there is but
one issue before this court and jury, and that is, did the defendant violate the statute" (Bryan). Bryan
felt that the defense had no case because the trial was not to debate the constitutionality of a law, but
to prove that said law was broken. The prosecution discovered that they needed to argue the
irrationality of teaching evolution and claimed that it was only a mysterious theory and could not
possibly have expert testimonies. The prosecution also argued that because science was the enabler
of modern warfare, it was also a source of evil; evil should not be taught in schools. Bryan said that
no teacher had the right either, to cause ideological conflict within the home by influencing a child
with theories contrary to their parentally instilled religious background

In 1859, Charles Darwin published his book On the Origin of
Species by Means of Natural Selection, which proposed the theory of evolution. This book, along
with others that followed, began the long dispute between evolutionist and creationist. Were we
created by a supernatural Supreme Being, or did our creation occur purely by chance? First, lets
look at the two conflicting theories. Common usage of the term "evolution" is that living things in
our world have come into existence through unguided naturalistic processes beginning from a
primeval mass of subatomic particles and radiation, over 20 billion years ago. The idea of Creation
comes from the first two chapters of Genesis which states that God created the heavens and...show
more content...
Therefore we have a catch–22 situation. Besides, there are geological evidences that confirm the
existence of an oxidizing atmosphere as far back as can be determined.
Among these are: the oxidation of ferrous iron in early rocks, and the precipitation of limestone in
great quantities.1 Now, lets assume for a minute that the ideal environment for evolution to occur
existed. We would then need a means by which the basic building blocks of life could be
constructed. Before you can assemble the large macro–molecules necessary for life you must have a
ready supply of basic organic molecules. Among these would be tons of sugars, amino acids,
purines, and pyrimidines. Now assuming we had a vast primitive ocean full of these molecules
there are still obstacles that would need to be overcome to have a suitable ocean. The first problem
would be the diluting effect of the vast ocean. There would not be enough quantities of each basic
molecule for molecular formation therefore insufficient quantities would result. The second problem
would be that in order for chemical bonds to form there would need to be an external source of
energy. Unfortunately the same energy that creates these bonds is much more likely to destroy them.
The last major obstacle to overcome would be the incompatibility of different

The theory of evolution, as set forth by Charles Darwin in 1859, stated that all plant and animal
life evolved over long periods of time from simple to more complicated forms through mutation
and adaptation. He also taught that only the fittest of each species would survive. He further
postulated that the first living cell evolved in a "warm warm little pond" and that it took billions
of years for the present diversity of living things to evolve. At the time, it was thought that the few
"missing links" in the fossil record would be soon filled.(Darwin, 1927 ). Today, however, there is
today a considerable body of scientific evidence that refutes this entire theory. The findings of the
last 50 years both deny the possibility of...show more content...
Mendel's Laws explain most of the physical variations observed in living things. Genes, the genetic
units of heredity, are merely reshuffled from one generation to another, but new genes are never
formed. Different combinations create variations, but these variations are limited. Each cow, person,
dog, etc. has variations, but the genetic units do not permit dog–people, or cow–dogs. Breeding
experiments by competent biologists confirm that these boundaries exist.(Fix,1984). Since mutations
are the only mechanism (according to Darwin) by which new genetic material becomes available,
then mutations must have occurred regularly to have spawned all our present life forms, and further,
mutation must consistently go from simple to complex to have gotten us out of the primordial ooze.
However, many noted biologists, including C.P. Martin and Theodosius Dobzhansky (who mutated
the fruit fly), consistently report that mutation does produce hereditary changes, but "invariably
affect it (the organism) adversely."(Salisbury, 1969). All animals are born with complex organs (the
human brain has over a hundred thousand billion electrical connections), and further, all animals are
born with fully developed organs. If evolution were occurring, at some point people

Creationism Vs Evolution
One of the most debated topics is creationism versus evolution. People all over the world have
argued on where and how life started and how humans came to be. Usually the arguments come
between christians and atheists. The topic has been debated about by many famous scientists
including Ken Ham and Bill Nye. Both these people defend their position in trying to prove where
they actually came from. Is there a superior being that created the universe? Was there abig bang
that led to life itself? These questions have become the most Googled questions on the planet.
However, earth did not begin with a big bang. It did not just come from a speck. It came from God,
the lord and our father who is in Heaven watching over everybody. I do not believe...show more
content...
Many scientists who are atheists will be told by creationists that evolution is just a theory. The
main comeback most to all of them have is " well gravity is just a theory but does that make it
invalid?". Another big thing that atheists use against creationists is that rocks are dated to be
over a million years old. In the Ken Ham vs Bill Nye debate, Bill Nye uses the statement that
"rocks are more than a million years old" several times. This is probably the basis of Bill Nye's
argument because how could an Earth created by a God only be six thousand years old and have
rocks more than a million years old on it (Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham Debate)? Another big topic
evolutionists use is "how come there is so many religions in the world? Why is Christianity the
true basis in how the world is created?". Biologist Greta Christina states that, if creationism is true
then couldn't it be any religion. She goes on saying that the Spaghetti Monster could be the creator
or that Mohamed could be the true God. This is a big reason why she believes creationism is
invalid (Christina). The Big Bang Theroy is what any scientists who disagree with creationism
believe in. The Big Bang theory is an effort to explain what happened at the very beginning of our
universe. According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence around 13.7 billion
years ago. So a basic definition of the how

Creationism vs. Evolution Essays
Creationism vs. Evolution
This paper will focus on the huge controversy between Creationism and Evolution. I will provide
two opposing viewpoints on this subject. First, the discussion will focus on the question of why
many people believe that God created the universe and all living things.
On the other end of the spectrum, scientific information will be presented that substantiates the
evidence against the existence of God. This creationism counter–argument known as evolution has its
roots in our contemporary understanding of a progressive process of natural evolution. This process
shaped the nature of all living things beginning with single–cell organisms and ending with highly
complex creatures such as humanoids....show more content...
Because of this, each consecutive generation will exhibit more offspring with the more successful
trait. The phrase "survival of the fittest" is derived from the process of continuous adaptation and
selective survival based on most successful inherited traits. (Biographies, 2000).
Even though many people believe that the theory of evolution was Darwin's personal idea and
creation, several of his thoughts actually existed before his time. Back in time of the ancient Greeks,
the concept of life evolving came about. Two Greek philosophers,
Anaximander and Empedocles had theories stating that all animals, as well as human beings, began
in the vast waters of the earth, the oceans. From these theories, it was said that some animals left
their natural habitat, the water, and adapted to life on land. Furthermore, the Greeks wrote about
natural selection, but they did not provide a specific explanation as to how evolution would work.
Because of these already known facts, the focal point of Charles Darwin's theory was formed and an
explanation to his theory of evolution came to life (Spetner 3).
However, creationism is a contemporary adaptation of the timeless parable of the clash between
Good and Evil. The concept behind this struggle is that everything in the world cannot remain
neutral and must choose a side when in conflict. You are either on God's team or you are siding

Where we come from is a question as old as mankind itself. There are countless numbers of
religions, each with their own twist on the origins of earth and mankind, but one of the most highly
visible debates would be creationism vs. evolution. Depending on where your beliefs lie, the Earth
has been around somewhere in the neighborhood of 6,000 years to 4.5 billion years. One would tend
to believe that this vast difference in time would make it impossible to have 2 "theories" that are
so widely accepted. However this debate gives you just that. Each argument has its variations,
however it comes down to either God created the Earth and all things in it as they are now or that
life today has evolved from a...show more content...
Under the same idea, the "Old Earth" train of thought is that the "days" mentioned in Genesis were
actually up to many millions of years each. This is one of many "theories" that justifies the actual
age of the Earth being around 4.5 billion years old. The third view states that the story of creation
contained in Genesis is not a literal or even a chronological account of happenings. It is instead a
guide promoting a six–day workweek with the seventh day a day of worship to God. The last view is
much like the second, in that it considers the "days" to be God's workdays, which may or may not
be equal to an Earth calendar day. Each day represents a period of time that God performed a major
task. Each view has the same underlying concept that God created everything, and the way it is
today, it the way it was when it was created.
Webster's Dictionary defines evolution as a theory that the various types of animals and plants have
their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modification
in successive generations. Like creation, evolution is not immune from differing of opinions.
Evolution is split between two frames of though, naturalistic and theistic.
Naturalistic evolution is pretty much cut and dry. It simply states that life started as a single
one–celled organism. The universe was created 14 billion years ago, and the Earth was

Creationism Vs Evolution Essay

More Related Content

Similar to Creationism Vs Evolution Essay

More from Paper Writing Service Reviews

Recently uploaded

Creationism Vs Evolution Essay