National Association of Workforce Boards presentation - Detroit Employment Solutions Corporation, Detroit Economic Growth Corporation, Grant Associates Inc.
Elena Reyes, PhD, Associate Professor & Director of Behavioral Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Regional Director Southwest Florida
ULEAD project presentation three-fold purpose: to learn and apply leadership abilities, to forge partnerships, and to provide service to and improvement of universities of the UNC system. The project topics were submitted and approved by university administrators and were all related to strategic university initiatives.
Interprofessional learning involves students learning from students and professors from other professions with the intention of cultivating a collaborative, interactive, and expansive learning environment. For example, some medical schools work with social care disciplines and other health care professions to improve patient-centered health care. The belief is that interprofessional collaboration builds more a flexible, efficient, and effective workforce, but research still needs to prove the claims of supporters. This presentation is our team's response to the topic 'How could interprofessional learning be implemented at our universities and what would be the benefits and costs?' for the 2016 University Leadership Education and Development Program at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
National Association of Workforce Boards presentation - Detroit Employment Solutions Corporation, Detroit Economic Growth Corporation, Grant Associates Inc.
Elena Reyes, PhD, Associate Professor & Director of Behavioral Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Regional Director Southwest Florida
ULEAD project presentation three-fold purpose: to learn and apply leadership abilities, to forge partnerships, and to provide service to and improvement of universities of the UNC system. The project topics were submitted and approved by university administrators and were all related to strategic university initiatives.
Interprofessional learning involves students learning from students and professors from other professions with the intention of cultivating a collaborative, interactive, and expansive learning environment. For example, some medical schools work with social care disciplines and other health care professions to improve patient-centered health care. The belief is that interprofessional collaboration builds more a flexible, efficient, and effective workforce, but research still needs to prove the claims of supporters. This presentation is our team's response to the topic 'How could interprofessional learning be implemented at our universities and what would be the benefits and costs?' for the 2016 University Leadership Education and Development Program at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Most organizations have accident investigation procedures. However, these procedures are often based on a blame culture & do not inspire the investigator to nd & correct the defects in the management system (root causes) that allowed the hazards to exist & the accident to occur.
Several industries have adopted excellent accident investigation & analysis techniques. Competence in the application of modern accident/incident investigation tools will assist organizations to learn & to prevent the recurrence of accidents & to evaluate the extent & location of management defects (root-causes), which contributed to the accident event. A good analytical accident investigation is invaluable to achieve continuous improvement in an organization’s HSE performance.
Safety and Health Learning Alliance Program ReviewNASA
The Safety and Health Learning Alliance is an inter-agency knowledge sharing program. The vision is to develop a virtual learning consortium with operational safety and occupational health leaders in the government, defense, professional organizations, and industry. Participants log into a live webcast, listen to an informative briefing, and ask questions and share ideas and experiences.
The goal of the program is to collaborate with other government agencies and civilian safety and health organizations to facilitate the flow of knowledge, information and resources for NASA Safety & Mission Assurance and NASA Occupational Health practitioners.
Preparing for an inter-institutional Benchmarking activity using the ACODE Be...Charles Darwin University
Over the last few years the Australasian Council of Online, Distance and eLearning (ACODE) have facilitated two major Benchmarking Summits in Sydney and Canberra, using the ACODE Benchmarks for TEL. These have been unprecedented events within the Australasian higher education, with 35 higher education institutions from five countries involved. To participate each institution first had to undertake a self-assessment of their capacity in TEL against the Performance Indicators in the tool, and then be willing to share this with the other institutions involved. Each institution assessed, at a minimum, two of the benchmarks, with many institutions doing far more. However, for an institution to maximize its experience with this activity they need to be starting their engagement well prior to the formal benchmarking activity. This workshop will help those new to the ACODE benchmarks understand what is required when using this tool. It will provide the wherewithal to ensure your participation is undertaken in a rigorous way. More importantly, it will provide a practical way to facilitate an internal activity, potentially with a view to then be involved in an inter-institutional activity. We will work through a number of different scenarios to help you understand the many facets needing to be considered in undertaking such an activity, and you leave with a strong plan of action for your institution to enhance its capacity in TEL.
This presentation to a Strategy Institute emergency planning conference for universities, colleges & K-12 schools highlights the importance and value of using standards such as CSA Z1600 for evaluating and developing university, college and school emergency management plans and programs.
Presentation discussing the development of an innovative evaluation and certification methodology for security systems, as part of the European project. By Dr Thordis Sveinsdottir.
American Drivers Don't Understand Today's Automotive Safety FeaturesSebastian James
The Public Policy Center at the University of Iowa recently commissioned a survey that measured public understanding of the many new developments in automotive safety. The results? The a majority of respondents don't understand the substance and benefits of new technologies. 40 percent of them noted that vehicles they drove with these improvements installed responded unexpectedly while behind the wheel.
These are the slides put together by Craig Schroll, President of FIRECON, in his presentation at the ASSE Virtual Symposium
http://www.asse.org/education/virtualclassroom.php
Informing the research environment with the Concordat for Units of AssessmentEmma Gillaspy
Workshop by Karen Clegg (Director of Researcher Development and Concordat Implementation Coordinator, University of York) and Rob Daley (Research Development Coordinator, Herriot Watt University) at the Vitae event 'Preparing for the Research Excellence Framework: Researcher development, the environment and future impact' on 11 July 2012 in Manchester www.vitae.ac.uk/preparingfortheref
Most organizations have accident investigation procedures. However, these procedures are often based on a blame culture & do not inspire the investigator to nd & correct the defects in the management system (root causes) that allowed the hazards to exist & the accident to occur.
Several industries have adopted excellent accident investigation & analysis techniques. Competence in the application of modern accident/incident investigation tools will assist organizations to learn & to prevent the recurrence of accidents & to evaluate the extent & location of management defects (root-causes), which contributed to the accident event. A good analytical accident investigation is invaluable to achieve continuous improvement in an organization’s HSE performance.
Safety and Health Learning Alliance Program ReviewNASA
The Safety and Health Learning Alliance is an inter-agency knowledge sharing program. The vision is to develop a virtual learning consortium with operational safety and occupational health leaders in the government, defense, professional organizations, and industry. Participants log into a live webcast, listen to an informative briefing, and ask questions and share ideas and experiences.
The goal of the program is to collaborate with other government agencies and civilian safety and health organizations to facilitate the flow of knowledge, information and resources for NASA Safety & Mission Assurance and NASA Occupational Health practitioners.
Preparing for an inter-institutional Benchmarking activity using the ACODE Be...Charles Darwin University
Over the last few years the Australasian Council of Online, Distance and eLearning (ACODE) have facilitated two major Benchmarking Summits in Sydney and Canberra, using the ACODE Benchmarks for TEL. These have been unprecedented events within the Australasian higher education, with 35 higher education institutions from five countries involved. To participate each institution first had to undertake a self-assessment of their capacity in TEL against the Performance Indicators in the tool, and then be willing to share this with the other institutions involved. Each institution assessed, at a minimum, two of the benchmarks, with many institutions doing far more. However, for an institution to maximize its experience with this activity they need to be starting their engagement well prior to the formal benchmarking activity. This workshop will help those new to the ACODE benchmarks understand what is required when using this tool. It will provide the wherewithal to ensure your participation is undertaken in a rigorous way. More importantly, it will provide a practical way to facilitate an internal activity, potentially with a view to then be involved in an inter-institutional activity. We will work through a number of different scenarios to help you understand the many facets needing to be considered in undertaking such an activity, and you leave with a strong plan of action for your institution to enhance its capacity in TEL.
This presentation to a Strategy Institute emergency planning conference for universities, colleges & K-12 schools highlights the importance and value of using standards such as CSA Z1600 for evaluating and developing university, college and school emergency management plans and programs.
Presentation discussing the development of an innovative evaluation and certification methodology for security systems, as part of the European project. By Dr Thordis Sveinsdottir.
American Drivers Don't Understand Today's Automotive Safety FeaturesSebastian James
The Public Policy Center at the University of Iowa recently commissioned a survey that measured public understanding of the many new developments in automotive safety. The results? The a majority of respondents don't understand the substance and benefits of new technologies. 40 percent of them noted that vehicles they drove with these improvements installed responded unexpectedly while behind the wheel.
These are the slides put together by Craig Schroll, President of FIRECON, in his presentation at the ASSE Virtual Symposium
http://www.asse.org/education/virtualclassroom.php
Informing the research environment with the Concordat for Units of AssessmentEmma Gillaspy
Workshop by Karen Clegg (Director of Researcher Development and Concordat Implementation Coordinator, University of York) and Rob Daley (Research Development Coordinator, Herriot Watt University) at the Vitae event 'Preparing for the Research Excellence Framework: Researcher development, the environment and future impact' on 11 July 2012 in Manchester www.vitae.ac.uk/preparingfortheref
Similar to 2010 CRC Showcase- Workforce Development - Evaluating Track Safety Awareness P4.105 (20)
1. Workforce Development
Program
AUSTRALIAN TRACK
SAFETY AWARENESS
Tom Short – CRC Research Fellow
Michele Simons – Project Leader
Tania Davies – CRC Program Chair
Established and Supported under Australia’s
Cooperative Research Centres Programme
2. Workforce Development
‘To contribute to the RSCC focus
on improving relevance and
national consistency of
education and training across
the industry’
EVALUATE RAIL SAFETY
INDUCTION COURSES
P4.105
3. Project P4.105
One Project – Two Outcomes
1. Evaluation methodology – to
assist in further development
of nationally consistent
approaches to training
2. A national curriculum for Track
Safety Awareness
4. Scoping Study on developing
national approaches to training
What we learned:
Diverse approach to the same topic
Need for a unified benchmark
Potential for savings
Part of managing risk
Build identity and recognition
Capture emerging issues
Provision for maintenance and
improvement
5. Industry research
Documents from six rail companies
Audit of three main courses
Interviews in five organisations
RISI National TSA
Rail & Safety Environmental Awareness
Rail Safety Rail Corridor
Awareness Induction
Train Track Safety Awareness
6. TSA – views across the industry
Viewed as relevant
Radical changes were not desired
Too technical for actual need
A national course was needed to
map the common elements
Not intended to replace company
induction
Need to recognise prior learning
7. TSA – mixed approach to training
Experiential learning was favoured
Classroom option was used when
space was limited for practical
Video resources aided learning
A good trainer was imperative
On-line training had restrictions
Solution: a range of delivery options
to suit the situation
8. Proposed course content
1. Introduction
2. Legal requirements
3. Your ATS Card
4. Supervision and the role of Protection Officers
5. Other significant personnel
6. Drugs, Alcohol and Fatigue
7. Train speed and braking distance
8. Basic rail corridor safety knowledge
9. Types of lines
10. Safety aspects of specific features
11. Signals
12. Personal protective equipment
13. Communications
14. Australian Standard Safety Procedure
15. Briefings and safety sheets
16. Electrical safety
9. Track safety assurance test
Section 1- Accreditation
Section 2- Drugs, Alcohol and fatigue
Section 3 - Track knowledge
Section 4 - Train knowledge
Section 5 - Signal knowledge
Section 6 - Station knowledge
Section 7 - Sidings and Yards
Section 8 - The Protection Officer
Section 9 - Clothing and equipment
Section 10 - General safety
Section 11 - Electricity
10. Assessment and evaluation
framework
1. Initial Test - Assessment of learning
immediately after TSA course
Acquisition of knowledge
2. Participant feedback - Evaluation of participant
satisfaction with training
View of participants
3. Assurance test - To assess deterioration of TSA
knowledge
Post-test in selected circumstances
11. Assurance across the industry
Test to track previous experience
Recertification tool
At test at the beginning of PO
course
Spot test by auditors
A test for TSA-only staff
12. Next Steps
Adopt a NATIONAL approach
New course material developed and
tested with industry Subject Matter
Experts (SMEs)
Secure commitment to the TSA
training course and assessment
Secure support for a program
maintenance advisory group
13. THANK YOU - QUESTIONS
Established and Supported under Australia’s
Cooperative Research Centres Programme