SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 27
Poly Living 2010
Workshop Presentation
 Canada’s (federal) criminal law, S. 293, criminalizes both
polygamy and group conjugal situations.
 The British Columbia Supreme Court has been asked by
the government of BC whether s. 293 is consistent with the
Charter of Rights and therefore constitutional.
 Government focus is on fundamentalist Mormon
communities (Bountiful) and patriarchal polygyny
 Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association (CPAA) has
intervened to ensure polyamorist perspective is
represented and not “collateral damage”.
CPAA formed as a legal entity to apply as an
“interested person” in the court case. Goal:
decriminalization.
All volunteer run, including legal counsel
Focus is on the litigation, with a secondary eye to
media/government
Formal membership presently includes those actively
working on the project: legal, media, research,
community outreach, technical, witnesses
Seed money of $1,100 in donations received
Web presence polyadvocacy.ca and CPAA Facebook
(1) Every one who
(a) practices or enters into or in any manner agrees or
consents to practice or enter into
(i) any form of polygamy, or
(ii) any kind of conjugal union with more than one person at
the same time,
whether or not it is by law recognized as a binding form of
marriage, or
(b) celebrates, assists or is a party to a rite, ceremony,
contract or consent that purports to sanction a relationship
mentioned in subparagraph (a)(i) or (ii),
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding five years.
Evidence in a case of polygamy
(2) Where an accused is charged with an offence
under this section, no averment or proof of the
method by which the alleged relationship was
entered into, agreed to or consented to is necessary
in the indictment or on the trial of the accused, nor is
it necessary on the trial to prove that the persons
who are alleged to have entered into the
relationship had or intended to have sexual
intercourse.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 257.
 First polygamy law enacted in 1890’s with a sub-
clause directed at Mormons. Monogamy as basis for
settlement and homestead system.
 Charges rare. Convictions even more rare.
 Used to assimilate aboriginal people, limit
polygamous immigration
 Family Law: affects custodial decisions, though few
known cases. Provincial jurisdiction for common
law/adoption/etc.
 Conduct of polygamous families: privacy.
Impact of s. 293
Increasing interest
Level of social acceptance: family/friends
Government responses: generally neutral
Community fears: not criminalization
Political organization minimal
So, how “out” are polyamorists?
Polyamory in
Canada
 Fundamentalist Mormon - FLDS
 (Fundamentalist Church of Latter Day Saints)
 First immigrated to Canada in the 1860’s
 Ties with US FLDS church, Warren Jeffs
 Polygynous (“celestial marriages”)
 Highly patriarchal
 Loyalty to the prophet above all else. Isolated and
separate from Canadian society
 Fears of this “cult”: treasonous.
 Allegations of abuse, exploitation of girls, lack of
“real” consent, limited/racist education, “lost boys”,
abuse of social safety net
Bountiful Polygamists
 Curious and interested media
 Context of Bountiful colours ability to “see” polyamory
 Distinguishing in the media and court:
• Polyamory v. patriarchal polygyny
• Decriminalization v. recognition
RCMP (police) investigations since 1990
Many legal opinions that the federal criminal polygamy law is
unconstitutional
In 2009,. charges laid by BC government against Blackmore/Oler
(Bountiful leaders) and thrown out due to abuse of process.
2009 BC Attorney General asks the BC Supreme Court (trial level) to hear
evidence and advise whether:
 S. 293 is consistent with the Charter of Rights. If not, then how so
and to what extent?
 What are the necessary elements of the offence? Does it require
that it involve a minor or occurs in a context of dependence,
exploitation, abuse of authority, a gross imbalance of power, or
undue influence?
Call for interveners (Interested Persons)
Recent BC government attempts to address
patriarchal polygamy and alleged abuse
 Attorney General of British Columbia
 Attorney General of Canada
 Amicus: the “friend of the court”
Position: Constitutional
 Stop Polygamy in Canada
 West Coast Legal Education Action Fund
 British Columbia Teachers Federation
 REAL Women of Canada
 Beyond Borders – Ensuring Global Justice for
Children
 Christian Legal Fellowship
 Cdn Coalition for the Rights of Children & David
Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights
Position: Not Constitutional
 Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ and
Latter Day Saints, (FLDS) & James Oler, Bishop
 BC Liberties Association
 Canadian Association for Free Expression
 Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association
 The law does not target polyamorists
 Law is constitutional when interpreted properly. Read law to require
sanctioning by an influential authority and binding.
• Even polygynous polyamorous relationships are not “polygamy” without
this and not intended to be prohibited by the law. Not associated with
the same harms.
• Situations associated with demonstrable and apprehended social
harms: patriarchal polygyny that is inter-generationally normalized and
enforced through more or less coercive rules and norms of non-state
social institutions.
 Also possible to read down the law to situations involving a minor,
occurring in a context of dependence, exploitation, abuse of authority, a
gross imbalance of power, or undue influence
 Note again: law is widely considered to be unconstitutional as written.
Early statements of Attorney General of of BC:
seem to exclude polyamory
 Immoral
 Harms:
• Overall negative social effect (the “cruel arithmetic”
argument)
• Harms to participants (women and children)
• Social harms (women’s equality rights)
 International obligations under human rights treaties
 Consistent with Canadian values
 Polyamorists could still be collateral damage
But what are the government arguments
against “criminal polygamy”?
 CPAA Witnesses :
• Polyandrous polyamorous groupings from across Canada.
(Five families who are quite different than at Bountiful)
 CPAA Survey:
• Random respondents from Poly community in Canada
 CPAA: Brandeis Brief materials and books
 Amicus witnesses:
• Freedom of religion: Wiccan Church of BC
 Evidence re happy polygamous families
 Expert and social science reports
 Supported anonymous FLDS witnessses
Consensual, egalitarian, polyamorous relationships, including conjugal
relationships, are equal in value and dignity to monogamous
relationships, and should be treated in the same way
S. 293 breaches Charter rights including: freedoms of conscience,
religion, association, and rights to equality, as well as life, liberty and
security of the person (vagueness, breadth)
Government should not be using a Victorian era criminal morality law to
criminalize loving and consensual polyamorous relationships.
There is no demonstrated harm and no reasonable anticipation of harm
in allowing multiple, loving polyamorous conjugal relationships.
If it is not criminal to have secret sexual affairs with multiple partners or
to have serial marriages, then it should not be criminal to live with
more than one conjugal partner at the same time.
Some positions and messages of the CPAA
 All evidence has been submitted
 Advising court as to who we want to
examine and preparing initial
positions
 November 22: hearing begins. 40
days
 Not wanting to appear to be “for” patriarchal polygyny
 Not bringing charges of alleged issues of abuse and
exploitation, or dealing with education funding/services
concerns
 Conservative federal government agenda
• Same sex marriage: attempt to reverse
• Disbanding of the Status of Women Committee
Dec 21, 1967:
Justice Minister (and later, Prime Minister)
Pierre Trudeau, modernizes the Criminal
Code of Canada. Decriminalizes
'homosexual acts' performed in private,
saying:
“…there's no place for the state in the
bedrooms of the nation“
and
"what's done in private between adults
doesn't concern the Criminal Code."
 On July 20, 2005, Canada legalized same-sex marriage
nationwide.
 Is decriminalization a slippery slope to recognition of
polyamorous marriage?
• Even if not criminal, recognition does not follow
• Different considerations than gay marriage
• Not on the agenda.
 Other actions and remedies
• Multiple conjugal relationships not recognized as common law
• Provincial jurisdiction
• Personal remedies: a self-help focus
• First, relationship obligations
 Learning from previous activist movements
Maybe not…..
 Some personal reflections. (Not CPAA)
 Both marriage and democracy are strengthened when more
people are given viable options for living their lives in tune
with their greatest desires, interests and needs.
 Criminalization is counterproductive to this goal.
 Instead put resources toward supporting the individual
against the potentially abusive power of the group (gov’ts,
corp’ns, religions or families). Education
Whither Marriage and Society?
 Our goal is decriminalization of families based solely on the
number of people involved.
 Families based on love and respect should not be the subject of
the criminal law.
 Criminalization causes secrecy, marginalization, shame, of
mutually loving relationships.
 Abusive and exploitative behaviours should be addressed
directly by the law, and no free pass for religious groups or
monogamous relationships .
 Polyamorous values are in line with greatest democratic values
of equality and freedom
 Donations
 Support – November 22
• Polyamory celebratory events?
 Be aware – informed
 In Canada, talk to your MP or MLA. Talk to
others. Educate them about polyamory.
 Media Watch reports
 The Importance of Being Monogamous, Sarah Carter
 Marriage, a History, Coontz
 Sex at Dawn, Ryan and Jetha
 Gay Marriage: The Story of a Canadian Social
Revolution, Sylvain Larocque
 The Secret Lives of Saints, Bramham
 Under the Banner of Heaven, a Story of Violent Faith,
Jon Krakauer
 Evaluating Modern Cults, p. 409-10, Shamans Sorcerers
and Saints A Prehistory of Religion, Brian Hayden
Carol’s reading: non-polyamory authors
 Forums at “www.polyadvocacy.ca”
 Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association
Fan Page on Facebook
– comment on discussions there
 Email us at “support@polyadvocacy.ca”

More Related Content

What's hot

The Touro Law Center’s Work to Break the “School-to-Prison” Pipeline
The Touro Law Center’s Work to Break the “School-to-Prison” Pipeline The Touro Law Center’s Work to Break the “School-to-Prison” Pipeline
The Touro Law Center’s Work to Break the “School-to-Prison” Pipeline
Nicholas Fortuna
 
Gay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
Gay Marriage: An ESLR PresentationGay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
Gay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
thatotherliam
 
Same sex marriage
Same sex marriageSame sex marriage
Same sex marriage
Tawni Marie
 
Registering Harm - How sex offense registries fail youth and communities
Registering Harm - How sex offense registries fail youth and communitiesRegistering Harm - How sex offense registries fail youth and communities
Registering Harm - How sex offense registries fail youth and communities
soissues
 
Youth Gang Power Point
Youth Gang Power PointYouth Gang Power Point
Youth Gang Power Point
CSD
 

What's hot (20)

The Touro Law Center’s Work to Break the “School-to-Prison” Pipeline
The Touro Law Center’s Work to Break the “School-to-Prison” Pipeline The Touro Law Center’s Work to Break the “School-to-Prison” Pipeline
The Touro Law Center’s Work to Break the “School-to-Prison” Pipeline
 
LGBT
LGBTLGBT
LGBT
 
A comparison of LGBT rights globally and in India
A comparison of LGBT rights globally and in IndiaA comparison of LGBT rights globally and in India
A comparison of LGBT rights globally and in India
 
Lgbt final
Lgbt finalLgbt final
Lgbt final
 
Against Adoption of Homosexuality and For Defending the Institution of Family...
Against Adoption of Homosexuality and For Defending the Institution of Family...Against Adoption of Homosexuality and For Defending the Institution of Family...
Against Adoption of Homosexuality and For Defending the Institution of Family...
 
Gay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
Gay Marriage: An ESLR PresentationGay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
Gay Marriage: An ESLR Presentation
 
PY622 Final Paper (correct)
PY622 Final Paper (correct)PY622 Final Paper (correct)
PY622 Final Paper (correct)
 
Preventive measures for the protection of children against sexual abuse
Preventive measures for the protection of children against sexual abusePreventive measures for the protection of children against sexual abuse
Preventive measures for the protection of children against sexual abuse
 
strong6_ppt_ch18
strong6_ppt_ch18strong6_ppt_ch18
strong6_ppt_ch18
 
Gay Rights
Gay  RightsGay  Rights
Gay Rights
 
Persons (Private Law)
Persons (Private Law)Persons (Private Law)
Persons (Private Law)
 
Gay Marriage (Final)
Gay Marriage (Final)Gay Marriage (Final)
Gay Marriage (Final)
 
Sabrina Winston - Same-Sex Marriage Thesis Presentation
Sabrina Winston - Same-Sex Marriage Thesis PresentationSabrina Winston - Same-Sex Marriage Thesis Presentation
Sabrina Winston - Same-Sex Marriage Thesis Presentation
 
Same-sex Marriage Lecture 6: In marriage redefined countries we see the decli...
Same-sex Marriage Lecture 6: In marriage redefined countries we see the decli...Same-sex Marriage Lecture 6: In marriage redefined countries we see the decli...
Same-sex Marriage Lecture 6: In marriage redefined countries we see the decli...
 
Tarea final
Tarea finalTarea final
Tarea final
 
FInaldraft
FInaldraftFInaldraft
FInaldraft
 
Same sex marriage
Same sex marriageSame sex marriage
Same sex marriage
 
LGBT RIGHTS
LGBT RIGHTSLGBT RIGHTS
LGBT RIGHTS
 
Registering Harm - How sex offense registries fail youth and communities
Registering Harm - How sex offense registries fail youth and communitiesRegistering Harm - How sex offense registries fail youth and communities
Registering Harm - How sex offense registries fail youth and communities
 
Youth Gang Power Point
Youth Gang Power PointYouth Gang Power Point
Youth Gang Power Point
 

Viewers also liked (18)

Ch04
Ch04Ch04
Ch04
 
2wtl adapted with voiceover
2wtl adapted with voiceover2wtl adapted with voiceover
2wtl adapted with voiceover
 
The origins of Halloween
The origins of HalloweenThe origins of Halloween
The origins of Halloween
 
Facebook
FacebookFacebook
Facebook
 
Camilas animal puzzle
Camilas animal puzzleCamilas animal puzzle
Camilas animal puzzle
 
第五章第三节
第五章第三节第五章第三节
第五章第三节
 
Ch03
Ch03Ch03
Ch03
 
Ch09
Ch09Ch09
Ch09
 
Ch11
Ch11Ch11
Ch11
 
Ch08
Ch08Ch08
Ch08
 
gita
gitagita
gita
 
Ch02
Ch02Ch02
Ch02
 
Ứng dụng kỹ thuật sinh học phân tử xác định chủng độc lực Bacilluc anthracis ...
Ứng dụng kỹ thuật sinh học phân tử xác định chủng độc lực Bacilluc anthracis ...Ứng dụng kỹ thuật sinh học phân tử xác định chủng độc lực Bacilluc anthracis ...
Ứng dụng kỹ thuật sinh học phân tử xác định chủng độc lực Bacilluc anthracis ...
 
Digital Strategy
Digital  StrategyDigital  Strategy
Digital Strategy
 
Ch10
Ch10Ch10
Ch10
 
Henrich polygamy power point (draft)
Henrich polygamy power point (draft)Henrich polygamy power point (draft)
Henrich polygamy power point (draft)
 
Ch05
Ch05Ch05
Ch05
 
Đại cương muỗi, muỗi sốt rét
Đại cương muỗi, muỗi sốt rétĐại cương muỗi, muỗi sốt rét
Đại cương muỗi, muỗi sốt rét
 

Recently uploaded

PEACE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND PALESTINE REQUIRES EXTREMISTS OUT OF POWER AND RESTR...
PEACE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND PALESTINE REQUIRES EXTREMISTS OUT OF POWER AND RESTR...PEACE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND PALESTINE REQUIRES EXTREMISTS OUT OF POWER AND RESTR...
PEACE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND PALESTINE REQUIRES EXTREMISTS OUT OF POWER AND RESTR...
Faga1939
 
CaseThe legal victory in the turmeric patent case safeguarded traditional kno...
CaseThe legal victory in the turmeric patent case safeguarded traditional kno...CaseThe legal victory in the turmeric patent case safeguarded traditional kno...
CaseThe legal victory in the turmeric patent case safeguarded traditional kno...
alpha012343210
 
R$ 78 milhões: Estado aprova 593 propostas para acordos diretos de precatórios
R$ 78 milhões: Estado aprova 593 propostas para acordos diretos de precatóriosR$ 78 milhões: Estado aprova 593 propostas para acordos diretos de precatórios
R$ 78 milhões: Estado aprova 593 propostas para acordos diretos de precatórios
Maurílio Júnior
 

Recently uploaded (20)

May 2024 - Crypto Market Report_FINAL.pdf
May 2024 - Crypto Market Report_FINAL.pdfMay 2024 - Crypto Market Report_FINAL.pdf
May 2024 - Crypto Market Report_FINAL.pdf
 
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
PEACE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND PALESTINE REQUIRES EXTREMISTS OUT OF POWER AND RESTR...
PEACE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND PALESTINE REQUIRES EXTREMISTS OUT OF POWER AND RESTR...PEACE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND PALESTINE REQUIRES EXTREMISTS OUT OF POWER AND RESTR...
PEACE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND PALESTINE REQUIRES EXTREMISTS OUT OF POWER AND RESTR...
 
23052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
23052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf23052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
23052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
24052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
24052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf24052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
24052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
CaseThe legal victory in the turmeric patent case safeguarded traditional kno...
CaseThe legal victory in the turmeric patent case safeguarded traditional kno...CaseThe legal victory in the turmeric patent case safeguarded traditional kno...
CaseThe legal victory in the turmeric patent case safeguarded traditional kno...
 
Encore portal Project PPt on live portal
Encore portal Project PPt on live portalEncore portal Project PPt on live portal
Encore portal Project PPt on live portal
 
2024 - Love and Madness - a book about love, madness, heartbreak and politics
2024 - Love and Madness - a book about love, madness, heartbreak and politics2024 - Love and Madness - a book about love, madness, heartbreak and politics
2024 - Love and Madness - a book about love, madness, heartbreak and politics
 
israeil_bnetaniahou_panel_report_eng.pdf
israeil_bnetaniahou_panel_report_eng.pdfisraeil_bnetaniahou_panel_report_eng.pdf
israeil_bnetaniahou_panel_report_eng.pdf
 
Embed-4-1-1.pdf vm ;sdkp[kdp[kpdkpodp;p;j
Embed-4-1-1.pdf vm ;sdkp[kdp[kpdkpodp;p;jEmbed-4-1-1.pdf vm ;sdkp[kdp[kpdkpodp;p;j
Embed-4-1-1.pdf vm ;sdkp[kdp[kpdkpodp;p;j
 
Positive Effects Of Social Media On Mental Health
Positive Effects Of Social Media On Mental HealthPositive Effects Of Social Media On Mental Health
Positive Effects Of Social Media On Mental Health
 
25052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
25052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf25052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
25052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
21052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
21052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf21052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
21052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
R$ 78 milhões: Estado aprova 593 propostas para acordos diretos de precatórios
R$ 78 milhões: Estado aprova 593 propostas para acordos diretos de precatóriosR$ 78 milhões: Estado aprova 593 propostas para acordos diretos de precatórios
R$ 78 milhões: Estado aprova 593 propostas para acordos diretos de precatórios
 
Have A Complimentary Cheat Sheet, On Us!!!
Have A Complimentary Cheat Sheet, On Us!!!Have A Complimentary Cheat Sheet, On Us!!!
Have A Complimentary Cheat Sheet, On Us!!!
 
Meta_AI_ads_investigation.pdfldoljjwejolejolol
Meta_AI_ads_investigation.pdfldoljjwejolejololMeta_AI_ads_investigation.pdfldoljjwejolejolol
Meta_AI_ads_investigation.pdfldoljjwejolejolol
 
Dominican American Coalition PAC Executive Summary
Dominican American Coalition PAC Executive SummaryDominican American Coalition PAC Executive Summary
Dominican American Coalition PAC Executive Summary
 
Minnesota Timberwolves Bring Ya Ass T Shirt
Minnesota Timberwolves Bring Ya Ass T ShirtMinnesota Timberwolves Bring Ya Ass T Shirt
Minnesota Timberwolves Bring Ya Ass T Shirt
 
Embed-4-3 (1).pdf cvxx'f['df[p'lf][l][fl][fl][][l[
Embed-4-3 (1).pdf cvxx'f['df[p'lf][l][fl][fl][][l[Embed-4-3 (1).pdf cvxx'f['df[p'lf][l][fl][fl][][l[
Embed-4-3 (1).pdf cvxx'f['df[p'lf][l][fl][fl][][l[
 
Embed-3-1-1.pdf The ECI direction on April 2, 2024 can be read here:
Embed-3-1-1.pdf  The ECI direction on April 2, 2024 can be read here:Embed-3-1-1.pdf  The ECI direction on April 2, 2024 can be read here:
Embed-3-1-1.pdf The ECI direction on April 2, 2024 can be read here:
 

CPAA presentation10 23 2010

  • 2.
  • 3.  Canada’s (federal) criminal law, S. 293, criminalizes both polygamy and group conjugal situations.  The British Columbia Supreme Court has been asked by the government of BC whether s. 293 is consistent with the Charter of Rights and therefore constitutional.  Government focus is on fundamentalist Mormon communities (Bountiful) and patriarchal polygyny  Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association (CPAA) has intervened to ensure polyamorist perspective is represented and not “collateral damage”.
  • 4. CPAA formed as a legal entity to apply as an “interested person” in the court case. Goal: decriminalization. All volunteer run, including legal counsel Focus is on the litigation, with a secondary eye to media/government Formal membership presently includes those actively working on the project: legal, media, research, community outreach, technical, witnesses Seed money of $1,100 in donations received Web presence polyadvocacy.ca and CPAA Facebook
  • 5. (1) Every one who (a) practices or enters into or in any manner agrees or consents to practice or enter into (i) any form of polygamy, or (ii) any kind of conjugal union with more than one person at the same time, whether or not it is by law recognized as a binding form of marriage, or (b) celebrates, assists or is a party to a rite, ceremony, contract or consent that purports to sanction a relationship mentioned in subparagraph (a)(i) or (ii), is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
  • 6. Evidence in a case of polygamy (2) Where an accused is charged with an offence under this section, no averment or proof of the method by which the alleged relationship was entered into, agreed to or consented to is necessary in the indictment or on the trial of the accused, nor is it necessary on the trial to prove that the persons who are alleged to have entered into the relationship had or intended to have sexual intercourse. R.S., c. C-34, s. 257.
  • 7.  First polygamy law enacted in 1890’s with a sub- clause directed at Mormons. Monogamy as basis for settlement and homestead system.  Charges rare. Convictions even more rare.  Used to assimilate aboriginal people, limit polygamous immigration  Family Law: affects custodial decisions, though few known cases. Provincial jurisdiction for common law/adoption/etc.  Conduct of polygamous families: privacy. Impact of s. 293
  • 8. Increasing interest Level of social acceptance: family/friends Government responses: generally neutral Community fears: not criminalization Political organization minimal So, how “out” are polyamorists? Polyamory in Canada
  • 9.  Fundamentalist Mormon - FLDS  (Fundamentalist Church of Latter Day Saints)  First immigrated to Canada in the 1860’s  Ties with US FLDS church, Warren Jeffs  Polygynous (“celestial marriages”)  Highly patriarchal  Loyalty to the prophet above all else. Isolated and separate from Canadian society  Fears of this “cult”: treasonous.  Allegations of abuse, exploitation of girls, lack of “real” consent, limited/racist education, “lost boys”, abuse of social safety net Bountiful Polygamists
  • 10.  Curious and interested media  Context of Bountiful colours ability to “see” polyamory  Distinguishing in the media and court: • Polyamory v. patriarchal polygyny • Decriminalization v. recognition
  • 11. RCMP (police) investigations since 1990 Many legal opinions that the federal criminal polygamy law is unconstitutional In 2009,. charges laid by BC government against Blackmore/Oler (Bountiful leaders) and thrown out due to abuse of process. 2009 BC Attorney General asks the BC Supreme Court (trial level) to hear evidence and advise whether:  S. 293 is consistent with the Charter of Rights. If not, then how so and to what extent?  What are the necessary elements of the offence? Does it require that it involve a minor or occurs in a context of dependence, exploitation, abuse of authority, a gross imbalance of power, or undue influence? Call for interveners (Interested Persons) Recent BC government attempts to address patriarchal polygamy and alleged abuse
  • 12.  Attorney General of British Columbia  Attorney General of Canada  Amicus: the “friend of the court”
  • 13. Position: Constitutional  Stop Polygamy in Canada  West Coast Legal Education Action Fund  British Columbia Teachers Federation  REAL Women of Canada  Beyond Borders – Ensuring Global Justice for Children  Christian Legal Fellowship  Cdn Coalition for the Rights of Children & David Asper Centre for Constitutional Rights
  • 14. Position: Not Constitutional  Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ and Latter Day Saints, (FLDS) & James Oler, Bishop  BC Liberties Association  Canadian Association for Free Expression  Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association
  • 15.  The law does not target polyamorists  Law is constitutional when interpreted properly. Read law to require sanctioning by an influential authority and binding. • Even polygynous polyamorous relationships are not “polygamy” without this and not intended to be prohibited by the law. Not associated with the same harms. • Situations associated with demonstrable and apprehended social harms: patriarchal polygyny that is inter-generationally normalized and enforced through more or less coercive rules and norms of non-state social institutions.  Also possible to read down the law to situations involving a minor, occurring in a context of dependence, exploitation, abuse of authority, a gross imbalance of power, or undue influence  Note again: law is widely considered to be unconstitutional as written. Early statements of Attorney General of of BC: seem to exclude polyamory
  • 16.  Immoral  Harms: • Overall negative social effect (the “cruel arithmetic” argument) • Harms to participants (women and children) • Social harms (women’s equality rights)  International obligations under human rights treaties  Consistent with Canadian values  Polyamorists could still be collateral damage But what are the government arguments against “criminal polygamy”?
  • 17.  CPAA Witnesses : • Polyandrous polyamorous groupings from across Canada. (Five families who are quite different than at Bountiful)  CPAA Survey: • Random respondents from Poly community in Canada  CPAA: Brandeis Brief materials and books  Amicus witnesses: • Freedom of religion: Wiccan Church of BC  Evidence re happy polygamous families  Expert and social science reports  Supported anonymous FLDS witnessses
  • 18. Consensual, egalitarian, polyamorous relationships, including conjugal relationships, are equal in value and dignity to monogamous relationships, and should be treated in the same way S. 293 breaches Charter rights including: freedoms of conscience, religion, association, and rights to equality, as well as life, liberty and security of the person (vagueness, breadth) Government should not be using a Victorian era criminal morality law to criminalize loving and consensual polyamorous relationships. There is no demonstrated harm and no reasonable anticipation of harm in allowing multiple, loving polyamorous conjugal relationships. If it is not criminal to have secret sexual affairs with multiple partners or to have serial marriages, then it should not be criminal to live with more than one conjugal partner at the same time. Some positions and messages of the CPAA
  • 19.  All evidence has been submitted  Advising court as to who we want to examine and preparing initial positions  November 22: hearing begins. 40 days
  • 20.  Not wanting to appear to be “for” patriarchal polygyny  Not bringing charges of alleged issues of abuse and exploitation, or dealing with education funding/services concerns  Conservative federal government agenda • Same sex marriage: attempt to reverse • Disbanding of the Status of Women Committee
  • 21. Dec 21, 1967: Justice Minister (and later, Prime Minister) Pierre Trudeau, modernizes the Criminal Code of Canada. Decriminalizes 'homosexual acts' performed in private, saying: “…there's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation“ and "what's done in private between adults doesn't concern the Criminal Code."
  • 22.  On July 20, 2005, Canada legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.  Is decriminalization a slippery slope to recognition of polyamorous marriage? • Even if not criminal, recognition does not follow • Different considerations than gay marriage • Not on the agenda.  Other actions and remedies • Multiple conjugal relationships not recognized as common law • Provincial jurisdiction • Personal remedies: a self-help focus • First, relationship obligations  Learning from previous activist movements Maybe not…..
  • 23.  Some personal reflections. (Not CPAA)  Both marriage and democracy are strengthened when more people are given viable options for living their lives in tune with their greatest desires, interests and needs.  Criminalization is counterproductive to this goal.  Instead put resources toward supporting the individual against the potentially abusive power of the group (gov’ts, corp’ns, religions or families). Education Whither Marriage and Society?
  • 24.  Our goal is decriminalization of families based solely on the number of people involved.  Families based on love and respect should not be the subject of the criminal law.  Criminalization causes secrecy, marginalization, shame, of mutually loving relationships.  Abusive and exploitative behaviours should be addressed directly by the law, and no free pass for religious groups or monogamous relationships .  Polyamorous values are in line with greatest democratic values of equality and freedom
  • 25.  Donations  Support – November 22 • Polyamory celebratory events?  Be aware – informed  In Canada, talk to your MP or MLA. Talk to others. Educate them about polyamory.  Media Watch reports
  • 26.  The Importance of Being Monogamous, Sarah Carter  Marriage, a History, Coontz  Sex at Dawn, Ryan and Jetha  Gay Marriage: The Story of a Canadian Social Revolution, Sylvain Larocque  The Secret Lives of Saints, Bramham  Under the Banner of Heaven, a Story of Violent Faith, Jon Krakauer  Evaluating Modern Cults, p. 409-10, Shamans Sorcerers and Saints A Prehistory of Religion, Brian Hayden Carol’s reading: non-polyamory authors
  • 27.  Forums at “www.polyadvocacy.ca”  Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association Fan Page on Facebook – comment on discussions there  Email us at “support@polyadvocacy.ca”