Novel Treatments for Osteoporosis Prof. Steven R. Cummings, MD San Francisco Coordinating Center Support from Novartis, Lilly, Organon, Pfizer,  Amgen,  NIH, Zelos
Outline Controlling Osteoclasts: Denosumab A Potential Cure for Osteoporosis? Osteocytes and Sclerostin The Perfect SERM?
Denosumab Anti-RANKL Antibodies
RANK - OPG system Rank is a receptor on osteoclasts;  Rank-Ligand (Rank-L) binds to Rank. This stimulates formation and activity of osteoclasts The Rank - RankL interaction is necessary and sufficient for bone resorption by osteoclasts
OPG Rank is a receptor on osteoclasts; Rank-L binds to Rank. This stimulates formation and activity of osteoclasts The Rank - RankL interaction is necessary and sufficient for bone resorption by osteoclasts.   OPG (osteoprotegerin) is a soluble receptor for RankL.  It binds RankL and inhibits bone resorption.
OPG knockout mouse Deletion of both copies of the OPG gene (-/-) causes severe osteoporosis because RankL acts without any competition from OPG
OPG and Denosumab Denosumab is an  antibody to Rank-Ligand Denosumab acts like OPG: it binds RankL and inhibits the development and activity of osteoclasts
Denosumab Denosumab is an  antibody to Rank-ligand Denosumab acts like OPG: it binds RankL and inhibits the development and activity of osteoclasts. Given by injection every 6 months
Denosumab Phase II Trial 412 postmenopausal women randomly assigned to 7 denosumab groups Q3 and Q6 mo intervals 4 different doses Alendronate 70 mg/d Placebo BMD and markers of bone turnover at 12 months McClung et al, NEJM 2006; 354:821
Denosumab vs. Alendronate vs. Placebo Alendronate Placebo Denosumab McClung et al, NEJM 2006; 354:821
Denosumab vs. Alendronate vs. Placebo Alendronate Placebo Denosumab McClung et al, NEJM 2006; 354:821
Stopping and restarting denosumab On Off  P. Miller, et al, Bone 2008
Stopping and restarting denosumab P. Miller, et al, Bone 2008 On Off
Other biological roles of the Rank/RankL/OPG system Vascular calcification Loss of OPG causes calcification of the media of arteries; not really atherosclerosis  Immune system T cells express RANKL; RANKL/RANK is essential for lymph node formation in baby mice
The FREEDOM Trial The Effect of Denosumab  on Fractures
The FREEDOM Trial Postmenopausal women aged 60 to 90 years Spine or hip T-score < -2.5 Subjects: Plus 400-800 IU vitamin D and  1 g of calcium Randomized trial 60 mg denosumab or placebo SC every 6 months for 36 months Study design:
The FREEDOM Trial No overall differences in rates of serious adverse events or of infection, malignancy or cardiovascular disease. Safety Denosumab reduced the risk of vertebral fractures by about 70% It also significantly reduced the risk of low trauma nonvertebral and hip fractures Efficacy
Denosumab Summary Works by a unique and fundamental mechanism Extremely potent Reduces the risk of vertebral, hip and other fractures Injection every 6 months may improve compliance
Osteocyte
Osteocytes form a network  within bone L = Lacune (osteocyte ‘caves’) C = Canaliculi
Osteocytes, osteoblasts and osteoblasts There are > 100-times more osteocytes in bone than osteoclasts and osteoblasts combined   Osteocytes live for years.  Osteoclasts and osteoblasts live for days to weeks.
J Feng and LF Bonewald, UMKC (Seeman, E, NEJM, 2006 ) The Osteocyte Network The largest organ in the body
d Osteocytes receive signals (e.g. strain) then send signals to osteoclasts and osteoblasts on the surface of bone From Lynda Bonewald Strain
Sclerostin A signal from osteocytes to precursors of osteoblasts
Sclerostin Produced by mature osteocytes Not found in any other cell Produced in response to stimuli, such as decreased loading   Inhibits the formation of osteoblasts
Absence of sclerostin should increase bone formation
Sclerosteosis: lack of sclerostin Due to mutations in the SOST gene, decreasing the production of biologically active sclerostin  A disease with very high bone mass Narrowing of neural foramina Can increase intracranial pressure causing death
Sclerosteosis
Anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibodies (scl mAb) Block the action of sclerostin Female rats, ovx (lost 12%) then treated for only 5 weeks
 
 
The possibility of ‘curing’ osteoporosis Could treat until BMD reaches a goal What would be the goal? Normal bone mass for a young adult? Normal risk of fractures for a young adult? Is there a limit? Can you form so much bone safely?
Lasofoxifene: A Novel SERM
SERMs bind to estrogen receptors (ER), changing their conformation Brzozowski AM  Nature,  1997 SERM (Raloxifene) Estradiol Depending on the change, the SERM: May have anti-estrogen or pro-estrogen effects The action is different in different tissues
The search for the perfect SERM From the days when estrogen kept a woman ‘Forever Young’ Modulating the estrogen receptor could produce all the benefits without any harms
The Holy Grail: The perfect SERM Decreased risk of  Breast cancer Vertebral fracture Nonvertebral fracture Cardiovascular disease Without   .   Endometrial cancer Hot flushes Venous thromboembolism
4 years of Raloxifene decreased  the risk of vertebral fracture* % with fracture Placebo RLX 60 RLX120 * Among women with vertebral fracture 36% 43%
4 years of raloxifene did not decrease  the risk of non-spine fractures % with fractures 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 15 10 5 0 Months Placebo Raloxifene RR = 0.93 (0.81, 1.06)
RUTH Trial: Raloxifene does not  decrease the risk of CHD Barrett-Connor,  N Engl J Med  2006;355:125
5 years of tamoxifen reduced the risk of ER+, not ER- breast cancer Fisher et al. , J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1371-88 # events  76%
•  5 years of tamoxifen continues to reduce breast cancer risk and mortality for at least 10 years after stopping treatment • Adverse effects (and costs) last only 5 years Early Breast Cancer Clinical Trialists Group. Lancet 2005;365:1687  Benefits Persist Off  Treat
RUTH Trial: Raloxifene does not  decrease the risk of CHD Barrett-Connor,  N Engl J Med  2006;355:125
Lasofoxifene improved spine BMD  more than raloxifene 3% 1.7% *p<0.05 vs placebo; †p<0.05 vs raloxifene. % Change From Baseline * *  † Raloxifene  60 mg/d Lasofoxifene  0.25 mg/d Placebo
The PEARL Trial* Randomized placebo-controlled trial Two daily doses (0.25 mg or 0.5 mg) All received 400 to 800 IU vitamin D3 and 1 g of calcium daily 5 years * P ostmenopausal  E valuation and  R isk-reduction with  L asofoxifene
Participants 8,556 women 59 to 80 years old BMD T-score ≤ -2.5 and ≥ -4.5 at the femoral neck or spine
Doses 0.5 mg / day had greater efficacy for most endpoints Lasofoxifene 0.5 mg per day is the dose intended for use
Percent Change vs. Placebo p  ≤  0.001 for all -12.5 (-25.1, 0.1) -15.8 (-26.7, -4.9) C-reactive Protein -15.8 (-19.5,-12.0) -16.2  (-19.7,-12.7) LDL-cholesterol +3.0 (2.7, 3.4) +2.9 (2.6, 3.2) Fem neck BMD +3.1 (2.8, 3.5) +3.0 (2.6, 3.3) Spine BMD 0.5 0.25 Lasofoxifene, mg/d
Summary of PEARL results 0.5 mg / day significantly reduced the risks of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Lasofoxifene 0.5 mg per day also reduced the risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease Lasofoxifene increased VTEs, but did not increase the risk of endometrial cancer
Summary Reduces the risk of Vertebral  and  nonvertebral fractures ER+ breast cancer  Major CHD events Stroke, not TIA Increases the risk of VTE With no increased risk of endometrial cancer  At the 0.5 mg dose lasofoxifene
Conclusion Advances in bone biology are producing potent new treatments  Denosumab has reached the maximum effect of antiresorptive therapy Blocking sclerostin may allow unlimited bone formation Could cure osteoporosis Lasofoxifene may have achieved almost all of the benefits desired from hormonal treatments
Novel Treatments
Novel Treatments
Novel Treatments
Novel Treatments
Novel Treatments
Novel Treatments

Novel Treatments

  • 1.
    Novel Treatments forOsteoporosis Prof. Steven R. Cummings, MD San Francisco Coordinating Center Support from Novartis, Lilly, Organon, Pfizer, Amgen, NIH, Zelos
  • 2.
    Outline Controlling Osteoclasts:Denosumab A Potential Cure for Osteoporosis? Osteocytes and Sclerostin The Perfect SERM?
  • 3.
  • 4.
    RANK - OPGsystem Rank is a receptor on osteoclasts; Rank-Ligand (Rank-L) binds to Rank. This stimulates formation and activity of osteoclasts The Rank - RankL interaction is necessary and sufficient for bone resorption by osteoclasts
  • 5.
    OPG Rank isa receptor on osteoclasts; Rank-L binds to Rank. This stimulates formation and activity of osteoclasts The Rank - RankL interaction is necessary and sufficient for bone resorption by osteoclasts. OPG (osteoprotegerin) is a soluble receptor for RankL. It binds RankL and inhibits bone resorption.
  • 6.
    OPG knockout mouseDeletion of both copies of the OPG gene (-/-) causes severe osteoporosis because RankL acts without any competition from OPG
  • 7.
    OPG and DenosumabDenosumab is an antibody to Rank-Ligand Denosumab acts like OPG: it binds RankL and inhibits the development and activity of osteoclasts
  • 8.
    Denosumab Denosumab isan antibody to Rank-ligand Denosumab acts like OPG: it binds RankL and inhibits the development and activity of osteoclasts. Given by injection every 6 months
  • 9.
    Denosumab Phase IITrial 412 postmenopausal women randomly assigned to 7 denosumab groups Q3 and Q6 mo intervals 4 different doses Alendronate 70 mg/d Placebo BMD and markers of bone turnover at 12 months McClung et al, NEJM 2006; 354:821
  • 10.
    Denosumab vs. Alendronatevs. Placebo Alendronate Placebo Denosumab McClung et al, NEJM 2006; 354:821
  • 11.
    Denosumab vs. Alendronatevs. Placebo Alendronate Placebo Denosumab McClung et al, NEJM 2006; 354:821
  • 12.
    Stopping and restartingdenosumab On Off P. Miller, et al, Bone 2008
  • 13.
    Stopping and restartingdenosumab P. Miller, et al, Bone 2008 On Off
  • 14.
    Other biological rolesof the Rank/RankL/OPG system Vascular calcification Loss of OPG causes calcification of the media of arteries; not really atherosclerosis Immune system T cells express RANKL; RANKL/RANK is essential for lymph node formation in baby mice
  • 15.
    The FREEDOM TrialThe Effect of Denosumab on Fractures
  • 16.
    The FREEDOM TrialPostmenopausal women aged 60 to 90 years Spine or hip T-score < -2.5 Subjects: Plus 400-800 IU vitamin D and 1 g of calcium Randomized trial 60 mg denosumab or placebo SC every 6 months for 36 months Study design:
  • 17.
    The FREEDOM TrialNo overall differences in rates of serious adverse events or of infection, malignancy or cardiovascular disease. Safety Denosumab reduced the risk of vertebral fractures by about 70% It also significantly reduced the risk of low trauma nonvertebral and hip fractures Efficacy
  • 18.
    Denosumab Summary Worksby a unique and fundamental mechanism Extremely potent Reduces the risk of vertebral, hip and other fractures Injection every 6 months may improve compliance
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Osteocytes form anetwork within bone L = Lacune (osteocyte ‘caves’) C = Canaliculi
  • 21.
    Osteocytes, osteoblasts andosteoblasts There are > 100-times more osteocytes in bone than osteoclasts and osteoblasts combined Osteocytes live for years. Osteoclasts and osteoblasts live for days to weeks.
  • 22.
    J Feng andLF Bonewald, UMKC (Seeman, E, NEJM, 2006 ) The Osteocyte Network The largest organ in the body
  • 23.
    d Osteocytes receivesignals (e.g. strain) then send signals to osteoclasts and osteoblasts on the surface of bone From Lynda Bonewald Strain
  • 24.
    Sclerostin A signalfrom osteocytes to precursors of osteoblasts
  • 25.
    Sclerostin Produced bymature osteocytes Not found in any other cell Produced in response to stimuli, such as decreased loading Inhibits the formation of osteoblasts
  • 26.
    Absence of sclerostinshould increase bone formation
  • 27.
    Sclerosteosis: lack ofsclerostin Due to mutations in the SOST gene, decreasing the production of biologically active sclerostin A disease with very high bone mass Narrowing of neural foramina Can increase intracranial pressure causing death
  • 28.
  • 29.
    Anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibodies(scl mAb) Block the action of sclerostin Female rats, ovx (lost 12%) then treated for only 5 weeks
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
    The possibility of‘curing’ osteoporosis Could treat until BMD reaches a goal What would be the goal? Normal bone mass for a young adult? Normal risk of fractures for a young adult? Is there a limit? Can you form so much bone safely?
  • 33.
  • 34.
    SERMs bind toestrogen receptors (ER), changing their conformation Brzozowski AM Nature, 1997 SERM (Raloxifene) Estradiol Depending on the change, the SERM: May have anti-estrogen or pro-estrogen effects The action is different in different tissues
  • 35.
    The search forthe perfect SERM From the days when estrogen kept a woman ‘Forever Young’ Modulating the estrogen receptor could produce all the benefits without any harms
  • 36.
    The Holy Grail:The perfect SERM Decreased risk of Breast cancer Vertebral fracture Nonvertebral fracture Cardiovascular disease Without . Endometrial cancer Hot flushes Venous thromboembolism
  • 37.
    4 years ofRaloxifene decreased the risk of vertebral fracture* % with fracture Placebo RLX 60 RLX120 * Among women with vertebral fracture 36% 43%
  • 38.
    4 years ofraloxifene did not decrease the risk of non-spine fractures % with fractures 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 15 10 5 0 Months Placebo Raloxifene RR = 0.93 (0.81, 1.06)
  • 39.
    RUTH Trial: Raloxifenedoes not decrease the risk of CHD Barrett-Connor, N Engl J Med 2006;355:125
  • 40.
    5 years oftamoxifen reduced the risk of ER+, not ER- breast cancer Fisher et al. , J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1371-88 # events 76%
  • 41.
    • 5years of tamoxifen continues to reduce breast cancer risk and mortality for at least 10 years after stopping treatment • Adverse effects (and costs) last only 5 years Early Breast Cancer Clinical Trialists Group. Lancet 2005;365:1687 Benefits Persist Off Treat
  • 42.
    RUTH Trial: Raloxifenedoes not decrease the risk of CHD Barrett-Connor, N Engl J Med 2006;355:125
  • 43.
    Lasofoxifene improved spineBMD more than raloxifene 3% 1.7% *p<0.05 vs placebo; †p<0.05 vs raloxifene. % Change From Baseline * * † Raloxifene 60 mg/d Lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/d Placebo
  • 44.
    The PEARL Trial*Randomized placebo-controlled trial Two daily doses (0.25 mg or 0.5 mg) All received 400 to 800 IU vitamin D3 and 1 g of calcium daily 5 years * P ostmenopausal E valuation and R isk-reduction with L asofoxifene
  • 45.
    Participants 8,556 women59 to 80 years old BMD T-score ≤ -2.5 and ≥ -4.5 at the femoral neck or spine
  • 46.
    Doses 0.5 mg/ day had greater efficacy for most endpoints Lasofoxifene 0.5 mg per day is the dose intended for use
  • 47.
    Percent Change vs.Placebo p ≤ 0.001 for all -12.5 (-25.1, 0.1) -15.8 (-26.7, -4.9) C-reactive Protein -15.8 (-19.5,-12.0) -16.2 (-19.7,-12.7) LDL-cholesterol +3.0 (2.7, 3.4) +2.9 (2.6, 3.2) Fem neck BMD +3.1 (2.8, 3.5) +3.0 (2.6, 3.3) Spine BMD 0.5 0.25 Lasofoxifene, mg/d
  • 48.
    Summary of PEARLresults 0.5 mg / day significantly reduced the risks of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Lasofoxifene 0.5 mg per day also reduced the risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular disease Lasofoxifene increased VTEs, but did not increase the risk of endometrial cancer
  • 49.
    Summary Reduces therisk of Vertebral and nonvertebral fractures ER+ breast cancer Major CHD events Stroke, not TIA Increases the risk of VTE With no increased risk of endometrial cancer At the 0.5 mg dose lasofoxifene
  • 50.
    Conclusion Advances inbone biology are producing potent new treatments Denosumab has reached the maximum effect of antiresorptive therapy Blocking sclerostin may allow unlimited bone formation Could cure osteoporosis Lasofoxifene may have achieved almost all of the benefits desired from hormonal treatments