Corporate governance involves establishing order between a firm's owners and top-level managers to effectively direct strategic decisions and ensure accountability. It addresses the separation of ownership and control through internal mechanisms like boards of directors and executive compensation, and external mechanisms like the market for corporate control. However, divergent interests between owners and managers can lead to agency problems if not properly monitored and controlled.
Role of board of directors -Corporate GovernanceRehan Ehsan
This Presentation states the role of board of directors in respect of corporate governance of Pakistan. Reviewing this clear the concept of their legal role in Pakistan.
Role of board of directors -Corporate GovernanceRehan Ehsan
This Presentation states the role of board of directors in respect of corporate governance of Pakistan. Reviewing this clear the concept of their legal role in Pakistan.
Ownership concentration, corporate governance and the firm's financial perfor...Santosh Pande
This contains the pre submission seminar presentation made by me in respect of my Ph D dissertation. Those interested in more details are welcome to email me at : spande@nihilent.com.
Ownership concentration, corporate governance and the firm's financial perfor...Santosh Pande
This contains the pre submission seminar presentation made by me in respect of my Ph D dissertation. Those interested in more details are welcome to email me at : spande@nihilent.com.
Impact of corporate governance on firm performance publishedMuhammad Usman
In the light of corporate financial scandals, there is an increasing attention on corporate governance issues. The investors look for emerging economies to diversify their investment portfolios to exhaust the possibilities of returns. This paper examines the impact of corporate governance variables on firms’ performance. This Research found that there is a direct positive relationship between profitability measured either by Earnings per share (EPS) or Return on assets (ROA) and corporate governance, also have a positive direct relationship between each of liquidity, dividend per share, and the size of the company with corporate governance, finally the study found a positive direct relationship between corporate governance and corporate performance. Various studies have been conducted in developing countries including Pakistan to investigate the relationship among corporate governance and firm performance. This study indicates that corporate governance can be measured through the following elements.
(1) board size (2) Female Member (3) CEO duality (4) Education of Directors (5) Board working experience(6) independent directors (7) board compensation (8) Board ownership (9) Audit committee (10) Board composition(11)Leadership Structure
The Cadbury Committee report (1991) defines corporate governance as a system by which corporate are directed and controlled.
According to Salins Sheikh and Williams Ress, corporate governance is concerned with ethics, values and morals of a company and its directors.
Impact of corporate governance on firm performance publishedMuhammad Usman
In the light of corporate financial scandals, there is an increasing attention on corporate governance issues. The investors look for emerging economies to diversify their investment portfolios to exhaust the possibilities of returns. This paper examines the impact of corporate governance variables on firms’ performance. This Research found that there is a direct positive relationship between profitability measured either by Earnings per share (EPS) or Return on assets (ROA) and corporate governance, also have a positive direct relationship between each of liquidity, dividend per share, and the size of the company with corporate governance, finally the study found a positive direct relationship between corporate governance and corporate performance. Various studies have been conducted in developing countries including Pakistan to investigate the relationship among corporate governance and firm performance. This study indicates that corporate governance can be measured through the following elements.
(1) board size (2) Female Member (3) CEO duality (4) Education of Directors (5) Board working experience(6) independent directors (7) board compensation (8) Board ownership (9) Audit committee (10) Board composition(11)Leadership Structure
Senior Seminar in Business Administration BUS 499Corporate.docxedgar6wallace88877
Senior Seminar in Business Administration
BUS 499
Corporate Governance
Welcome to Senior Seminar in Business Administration.
In this lesson we will discuss Corporate Governance.
Please go to the next slide.
Objectives
Upon completion of this lesson, you will be able to:
Describe how corporate governance affects strategic decisions
Upon completion of this lesson, you will be able to:
Describe how corporate governance affects strategic decisions.
Please go to the next slide.
Supporting Topics
Separation of Ownership and Managerial Control
Ownership Concentration
Board of Directors
Market for Corporate Control
International Corporate Governance
Governance Mechanisms and Ethical Behavior
In order to achieve these objectives, the following supporting topics will be covered:
Separation of ownership and managerial control;
Ownership concentration;
Board of directors;
Market for corporate control;
International corporate governance; and
Governance mechanisms and ethical behavior.
Please go to the next slide.
Separation of Ownership and Managerial Control
What is Corporate Governance
Shareholders
Purchase stock
Managing of their investment risk
Agency Relationships
Problems
Different interests and goals
Managerial Opportunism
Agency Costs
To start off the lesson, corporate governance is defined as a set of mechanisms used to manage the relationship among stakeholders and to determine and control the strategic direction and performance of organizations. Corporate governance is concerned with identifying ways to ensure that decisions are made effectively and that they facilitate strategic competitiveness. Another way to think of governance is to establish and maintain harmony between parties.
Traditionally, U. S. firms were managed by founder- owners and their descendants. As firms became larger the managerial revolution led to a separation of ownership and control in most large corporations. This control of the firm shifted from entrepreneurs to professional managers while ownership became dispersed among unorganized stockholders. Due to these changes modern public corporation was created and was based on the efficient separation of ownership and managerial control.
The separation of ownership and managerial control allows shareholders to purchase stock. This in turn entitles them to income from the firm’s operations after paying expenses. This requires that shareholders take a risk that the firm’s expenses may exceed its revenues.
Shareholders specialize in managing their investment risk. Those managing small firms also own a significant percentage of the firm and there is often less separation between ownership and managerial control. Meanwhile, in a large number of family owned firms, ownership and managerial control are not separated at all. The primary purpose of most large family firms is to increase the family’s wealth.
The separation between owners and managers creates an agency relationship. An agency re.
Home Learning Week 81.) What is Corporate Social ResponsibilitSusanaFurman449
Home Learning Week 8
1.) What is Corporate Social Responsibility and why are companies engaged in it?
2.) Discuss the evolving phases of Corporate Social Responsibility
3.) Describe Carroll’s four-part definition of CSR and contrast it to Firedman’s “the business of business is business”
4.) Discuss why companies are engaged in Corporate Social Reporting
Senior Seminar in Business Administration
BUS 499
Corporate Governance
Welcome to Senior Seminar in Business Administration.
In this lesson we will discuss Corporate Governance.
Please go to the next slide.
Objectives
Upon completion of this lesson, you will be able to:
Describe how corporate governance affects strategic decisions
Upon completion of this lesson, you will be able to:
Describe how corporate governance affects strategic decisions.
Please go to the next slide.
Supporting Topics
Separation of Ownership and Managerial Control
Ownership Concentration
Board of Directors
Market for Corporate Control
International Corporate Governance
Governance Mechanisms and Ethical Behavior
In order to achieve these objectives, the following supporting topics will be covered:
Separation of ownership and managerial control;
Ownership concentration;
Board of directors;
Market for corporate control;
International corporate governance; and
Governance mechanisms and ethical behavior.
Please go to the next slide.
Separation of Ownership and Managerial Control
What is Corporate Governance
Shareholders
Purchase stock
Managing of their investment risk
Agency Relationships
Problems
Different interests and goals
Managerial Opportunism
Agency Costs
To start off the lesson, corporate governance is defined as a set of mechanisms used to manage the relationship among stakeholders and to determine and control the strategic direction and performance of organizations. Corporate governance is concerned with identifying ways to ensure that decisions are made effectively and that they facilitate strategic competitiveness. Another way to think of governance is to establish and maintain harmony between parties.
Traditionally, U. S. firms were managed by founder- owners and their descendants. As firms became larger the managerial revolution led to a separation of ownership and control in most large corporations. This control of the firm shifted from entrepreneurs to professional managers while ownership became dispersed among unorganized stockholders. Due to these changes modern public corporation was created and was based on the efficient separation of ownership and managerial control.
The separation of ownership and managerial control allows shareholders to purchase stock. This in turn entitles them to income from the firm’s operations after paying expenses. This requires that shareholders take a risk that the firm’s expenses may exceed its revenues.
Shareholders specialize in managing their investment risk. Those managing small firms also own a significant percentage ...
Ed Jiminez from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas speaks about the role Governance plays in Microfinance Institutions (Jan 29, PACAP Community Development Forum: Microfinance Amidst the Global Financial Crisis.
BUS 499, Week 8 Corporate Governance Slide #TopicNarration.docxcurwenmichaela
BUS 499, Week 8: Corporate Governance
Slide #
Topic
Narration
1
Introduction
Welcome to Senior Seminar in Business Administration.
In this lesson we will discuss Corporate Governance.
Please go to the next slide.
2
Objectives
Upon completion of this lesson, you will be able to:
Describe how corporate governance affects strategic decisions.
Please go to the next slide.
3
Supporting Topics
In order to achieve these objectives, the following supporting topics will be covered:
Separation of ownership and managerial control;
Ownership concentration;
Board of directors;
Market for corporate control;
International corporate governance; and
Governance mechanisms and ethical behavior.
Please go to the next slide.
4
Separation of Ownership and Managerial Control
To start off the lesson, corporate governance is defined as a set of mechanisms used to manage the relationship among stakeholders and to determine and control the strategic direction and performance of organizations. Corporate governance is concerned with identifying ways to ensure that decisionsare made effectively and that they facilitate strategic competitiveness. Another way to think of governance is to establish and maintain harmony between parties.
Traditionally, U. S. firms were managed by founder- owners and their descendants. As firms became larger the managerial revolution led to a separation of ownership and control in most large corporations. This control of the firm shifted from entrepreneurs to professional managers while ownership became dispersed among unorganized stockholders. Due to these changes modern public corporation was created and was based on the efficient separation of ownership and managerial control.
The separation of ownership and managerial control allows shareholders to purchase stock. This in turn entitles them to income from the firm’s operations after paying expenses. This requires that shareholders take a risk that the firm’s expenses may exceed its revenues.
Shareholders specialize in managing their investment risk. Those managing small firms also own a significant percentage of the firm and there is often less separation between ownership and managerial control. Meanwhile, in a large number of family owned firms, ownership and managerial control are not separated at all. The primary purpose of most large family firms is to increase the family’s wealth.
The separation between owners and managers creates an agencyrelationship. An agency relationship exists when one or more persons hire another person or persons as decision- making specialists to perform a service. As a result an agency relationship exists when one party delegates decision- making responsibility to a second party for compensation. Other examples of agency relationships are consultants and clients and insured and insurer. An agency relationship can also exist between managers and their employees, as well as between top- level managers and the firm’s owners.
The sep.
BUS 499, Week 8 Corporate Governance Slide #TopicNarrationVannaSchrader3
BUS 499, Week 8: Corporate Governance
Slide #
Topic
Narration
1
Introduction
Welcome to Senior Seminar in Business Administration.
In this lesson we will discuss Corporate Governance.
Please go to the next slide.
2
Objectives
Upon completion of this lesson, you will be able to:
Describe how corporate governance affects strategic decisions.
Please go to the next slide.
3
Supporting Topics
In order to achieve these objectives, the following supporting topics will be covered:
Separation of ownership and managerial control;
Ownership concentration;
Board of directors;
Market for corporate control;
International corporate governance; and
Governance mechanisms and ethical behavior.
Please go to the next slide.
4
Separation of Ownership and Managerial Control
To start off the lesson, corporate governance is defined as a set of mechanisms used to manage the relationship among stakeholders and to determine and control the strategic direction and performance of organizations. Corporate governance is concerned with identifying ways to ensure that decisionsare made effectively and that they facilitate strategic competitiveness. Another way to think of governance is to establish and maintain harmony between parties.
Traditionally, U. S. firms were managed by founder- owners and their descendants. As firms became larger the managerial revolution led to a separation of ownership and control in most large corporations. This control of the firm shifted from entrepreneurs to professional managers while ownership became dispersed among unorganized stockholders. Due to these changes modern public corporation was created and was based on the efficient separation of ownership and managerial control.
The separation of ownership and managerial control allows shareholders to purchase stock. This in turn entitles them to income from the firm’s operations after paying expenses. This requires that shareholders take a risk that the firm’s expenses may exceed its revenues.
Shareholders specialize in managing their investment risk. Those managing small firms also own a significant percentage of the firm and there is often less separation between ownership and managerial control. Meanwhile, in a large number of family owned firms, ownership and managerial control are not separated at all. The primary purpose of most large family firms is to increase the family’s wealth.
The separation between owners and managers creates an agencyrelationship. An agency relationship exists when one or more persons hire another person or persons as decision- making specialists to perform a service. As a result an agency relationship exists when one party delegates decision- making responsibility to a second party for compensation. Other examples of agency relationships are consultants and clients and insured and insurer. An agency relationship can also exist between managers and their employees, as well as between top- level managers and the firm’s owners.
The sep ...
2. Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance is:
A relationship among stakeholders that is used
to determine and control the strategic direction
and performance of organizations.
Concerned with identifying ways to ensure that
strategic decisions are made more effectively.
Used in corporations to establish order
between the firm’s owners and its top-level
managers whose interests may be in conflict.
3. Internal Governance Mechanisms
Ownership Concentration
Relative amounts of stock owned
by individual shareholders and
institutional investors
Board of Directors
Individuals responsible
for representing the firm’s
owners by monitoring top-level
managers’ strategic decisions
4. Internal Governance Mechanisms (cont’d)
Executive Compensation
The use of salary, bonuses, and
long-term incentives to align
managers’ interests with
shareholders’ interests.
Market for Corporate Control
The purchase of a firm that is
underperforming relative to
industry rivals in order to improve
its strategic competitiveness.
5. Separation of Ownership & Managerial Control
Basis of the modern Modern public corporation
corporation form leads to efficient
Shareholders purchase specialization of tasks:
stock, becoming residual Risk bearing by
claimants. shareholders
Strategy development
Shareholders reduce risk and decision making by
by holding diversified managers
portfolios.
Professional managers
are contracted to provide
decision making
7. Agency Relationship Problems
Principal and agent have divergent interests and goals.
Shareholders lack direct control of large, publicly traded
corporations.
Agent makes decisions that result in the pursuit of goals that
conflict with those of the principal.
It is difficult or expensive for the principal to verify that the agent
has behaved appropriately.
Agent falls prey to managerial opportunism.
8. Managerial Opportunism
The seeking of self-interest with guile (cunning or deceit)
Managerial opportunism is:
An attitude (inclination)
A set of behaviors (specific acts of self-interest)
Managerial opportunism prevents the maximization of
shareholder wealth (the primary goal of owner/principals).
9. Response to Managerial Opportunism
Principals do not know beforehand which agents will or will not
act opportunistically.
Thus, principals establish governance and control mechanisms
to prevent managerial opportunism.
10. Examples of Agency Problem
The Problem of Product Diversification
Increased size, and the relationship of size to managerial
compensation
Reduction of managerial employment risk
Use of Free Cash Flows
Managers prefer to invest these funds in additional product
diversification (see above).
Shareholders prefer the funds as dividends so they control
how the funds are invested.
12. Agency Cost & Governance Mechanisms
Agency Costs
The sum of incentive costs, monitoring costs, enforcement
costs, and individual financial losses incurred by principals,
because governance mechanisms cannot guarantee total
compliance by the agent.
Principals may engage in monitoring behavior to assess the
activities and decisions of managers.
However, dispersed shareholding makes it difficult and
inefficient to monitor management’s behavior.
13. Agency Cost & Governance Mechanisms (cont’d)
Boards of Directors have a fiduciary duty to shareholders to
monitor management.
However, Boards of Directors are often accused of being lax
in performing this function.
14. Corporate Governance Mechanisms
Internal Governance Mechanisms
Ownership Concentration
Relative amounts of stock owned by individual shareholders and
institutional investors
Board of Directors
Individuals responsible for representing the firm’s owners by monitoring
top-level managers’ strategic decisions
Executive Compensation
Use of salary, bonuses, and long-term incentives to align managers’
interests with shareholders’ interests
External Governance Mechanism
Market for Corporate Control
The purchase of a company that is underperforming relative to industry
rivals in order to improve the firm’s strategic competitiveness
15. Governance Mechanism
Ownership Large block shareholders have a
Concentration (a) strong incentive to monitor
management closely:
Their large stakes make it worth
their while to spend time, effort and
expense to monitor closely.
They may also obtain Board seats
which enhances their ability to
monitor effectively.
Financial institutions are legally
forbidden from directly holding
board seats.
16. Governance Mechanism
Ownership The increasing influence of
Concentration (b) institutional owners (stock
mutual funds and pension funds)
Have the size (proxy voting power)
and incentive (demand for returns to
funds) to discipline ineffective top-
level managers.
Can affect the firm’s choice of
strategies.
17. Governance Mechanism
Ownership Shareholder activism:
Concentration (c) Shareholders can convene to
discuss corporation’s direction.
If a consensus exists, shareholders
can vote as a block to elect their
candidates to the board.
Proxy fights.
There are limits on shareholder
activism available to institutional
owners in responding to activists’
tactics
18. Governance Mechanism
Ownership Board of directors
Concentration Group of elected individuals that
acts in the owners’ interests to
Board of Directors formally monitor and control the
(a) firm’s top-level executives
Board has the power to:
Direct the affairs of the organization
Punish and reward managers
Protect owners from managerial
opportunism
19. Governance Mechanism (cont’d)
Ownership Composition of Boards:
Concentration Insiders: the firm’s CEO and other
top-level managers
Board of Directors Related Outsiders: individuals
(b) uninvolved with day-to-day
operations, but who have a
relationship with the firm
Outsiders: individuals who are
independent of the firm’s day-to-day
operations and other relationships
20. Governance Mechanism (cont’d)
Ownership Criticisms of Boards of Directors
Concentration include:
Too readily approve managers’ self-
Board of Directors serving initiatives
(c) Are exploited by managers with
personal ties to board members
Are not vigilant enough in hiring and
monitoring CEO behavior
Lack of agreement about the
number of and most appropriate
role of outside directors.
21. Governance Mechanism (cont’d)
Ownership Enhancing the effectiveness of
Concentration boards and directors:
More diversity in the backgrounds
Board of Directors of board members
(d) Stronger internal management and
accounting control systems
More formal processes to evaluate
the board’s performance
Adopting a “lead director” role.
Changes in compensation of
directors.
22. Governance Mechanism (cont’d)
Ownership Forms of compensation:
Concentration Salaries, bonuses, long-term
performance incentives, stock
awards, stock options
Board of Directors Factors complicating executive
compensation:
Executive Strategic decisions by top-level
managers are complex, non-routine
Compensation (a) and affect the firm over an extended
period.
Other variables affecting the firm’s
performance over time.
23. Governance Mechanism (cont’d)
Ownership Limits on the effectiveness of
Concentration executive compensation:
Unintended consequences of stock
options
Board of Directors
Firm performance not as important
than firm size
Executive Balance sheet not showing
Compensation (b) executive wealth
Options not expensed at the time
they are awarded
24. Governance Mechanism (cont’d)
Ownership
Concentration Individuals and firms buy or
take over undervalued
corporations.
Board of Directors
Ineffective managers are usually
replaced in such takeovers.
Executive Threat of takeover may lead
Compensation firm to operate more efficiently.
Changes in regulations have
Market for made hostile takeovers difficult.
Corporate Control (a)
25. Governance Mechanism (cont’d)
Ownership Managerial defense tactics
Concentration increase the costs of mounting
a takeover
Board of Directors Defense tactics may require:
Asset restructuring
Changes in the financial structure
Executive of the firm
Compensation
Shareholder approval
Market for Market for corporate control
Corporate Control (b) lacks the precision of internal
governance mechanisms.
26. The General Environment: Segments & Elements
Defense strategy Category Popularity Effectiveness Stockholder
among firms as a defense wealth effects
Poison pill Preventive High High Positive
Corporate charter Preventive Medium Very low Negative
amendment
Golden parachute Preventive Medium Low Negligible
Litigation Reactive Medium Low Positive
Greenmail Reactive Very low Medium Negative
Standstill Reactive Low Low Negative
agreement
Capital structure Reactive Medium Medium Inconclusive
change
27. International Corporate Governance
Germany
Owner and manager are often
the same in private firms.
Public firms often have a
dominant shareholder,
frequently a bank.
Frequently there is less
emphasis on shareholder value
than in U.S. firms, although this
may be changing.
28. International Corporate Governance (cont’d)
Germany: Two-tiered Board
Vorstand Responsible for the functions of
direction and management
Responsible for appointing
Aufsichtsrat members to the Vorstand
Union
Responsible for appointing
members
members to the Aufsichtsrat
Shareholders
29. International Corporate Governance (cont’d)
Japan
Important governance factors:
o Obligation
o Family
o Consensus
Keiretsus: strongly interrelated
groups of firms tied together by
cross-shareholdings.
Banks (especially “main bank”) are
highly influential with firm’s
managers
30. International Corporate Governance (cont’d)
Japan (cont’d)
Other governance characteristics:
o Powerful government intervention
o Close relationships between firms and government
sectors
o Passive and stable shareholders who exert little control
o Virtual absence of external market for corporate control
31. International Corporate Governance (cont’d)
Global Corporate Governance
Organizations worldwide are adopting a relatively
uniform governance structure.
o Boards of directors are becoming smaller, with more
independent and outside members.
o Investors are becoming more active.
o In rapidly developing market economies, minority
shareholder rights are not protected by adequate
governance controls.
32. Governance Mechanism & Ethical Behavior
It is important to serve the interests of the
firm’s multiple stakeholder groups!
Capital Market Shareholders (in the capital market
Stakeholders stakeholder group) are viewed as the
most important stakeholder group.
Product Market
The focus of governance mechanisms is
Stakeholders
on the control of managerial decisions to
assure shareholder interests.
Organizational
Stakeholders Interests of shareholders is served by the
Board of Directors.
33. Governance Mechanism & Ethical Behavior (cont’d)
It is important to serve the interests of the
firm’s multiple stakeholder groups!
Capital Market Product market stakeholders
Stakeholders (customers, suppliers and host
communities) and organizational
Product Market stakeholders may withdraw their support
Stakeholders of the firm if their needs are not met, at
least minimally.
Organizational
Stakeholders
34. Governance Mechanism & Ethical Behavior (cont’d)
It is important to serve the interests of the
firm’s multiple stakeholder groups!
Capital Market Some observers believe that ethically
Stakeholders responsible companies design and use
governance mechanisms that serve all
Product Market stakeholders’ interests.
Stakeholders Importance of maintaining ethical
behavior is seen in the examples of
Organizational Enron, WorldCom, HealthSouth and
Stakeholders Tyco.
35. Response to Managerial Opportunism
• Principals do not know beforehand which agents will or will not
act opportunistically.
• Thus, principals establish governance and control mechanisms
to prevent managerial opportunism.