The document summarizes the key aspects of a contract of bailment under Indian law. It defines a bailment as the delivery of goods by one person (bailor) to another (bailee) for a certain purpose, to be returned or disposed of according to the bailor's instructions. The essential elements of a valid bailment are the delivery of goods, possession on a contract, and the obligation to return the goods. The duties of the bailor and bailee are also outlined, including the bailee's duty of reasonable care and the bailor's duty to disclose faults in goods bailed gratuitously. Exceptions and qualifications to these duties are discussed through case law examples.
The document summarizes the key principles of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) under Indian sale of goods law. It notes that caveat emptor originally applied, but there are now several exceptions, including when goods are purchased by description, sample, for a particular purpose, or where the seller uses fraud or conceals defects. It provides examples to illustrate exceptions for purchase by description, sample, and merchantable quality.
This document provides an overview of the contracts of bailment and pledge under Indian law. It defines bailment and pledge, distinguishes between the two, and outlines their essential elements. Bailment involves the delivery of goods for a specific purpose, while pledge is a type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for a debt. The document discusses the duties of bailors and bailees, as well as the rights of each party. It also covers related topics like finders of lost goods and provides illustrations of bailment and pledge.
Consideration is something of value that is exchanged between parties to a contract. It is essential for a valid contract. Consideration can be in the form of an act, abstinence from an act, or a promise. It must be something that moves from the promisee at the desire of the promisor. Consideration does not need to be adequate, but it must be real, lawful, and not something the promisor is already obligated to do. Without consideration, there is no valid contract, though there are some exceptions such as natural love and affection or compensation for voluntary services.
This document provides an overview of the law of contracts as it relates to guarantees. It defines a guarantee as a tripartite agreement involving a principal debtor, creditor, and surety where the surety assumes secondary liability for the debt if the principal debtor defaults. The document outlines the essential elements of a valid guarantee contract and distinguishes guarantees from indemnity agreements. It also discusses different types of guarantees like continuing guarantees and how continuing guarantees can be revoked. Overall, the document provides a high-level introduction to key concepts regarding guarantees under contract law in 3 sentences or less.
A quasi-contract is an obligation imposed by law that requires one party to compensate another party. It arises in situations where there is no valid contract but where justice demands compensation be provided. Key features of a quasi-contract include that it is not based on a formal agreement and can only be enforced against specific individuals involved in the situation, not the world at large. Common examples include a plumber mistakenly installing a sprinkler system and then being required to be paid, or goods being left at someone's house by mistake and the person keeping the goods for their own use. The goal of a quasi-contract is to prevent unjust enrichment at another's expense.
An agent is a person authorized to act on behalf of another person called the principal. The relationship between them is called agency. An agency can be created expressly through an agreement or impliedly through actions like ratification or holding out. As an agent, one has duties to follow the principal's instructions, conduct business with care, communicate properly, and not make secret profits. The principal has duties to pay the agent and not interfere without cause. An agency terminates through completion, death, lapse of time, or revocation except if the agency is coupled with an interest of the agent.
The document defines bailment under Indian contract law as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a specific purpose, with the obligation to return the goods. It outlines the key elements of bailment including the bailor, bailee, subject matter, characteristics, essentials, types of bailment, rights and duties of bailor and bailee, and termination of bailment. Bailment involves delivery of movable property, is based on an agreement, and requires return of the goods once the purpose is fulfilled.
The document summarizes the key principles of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) under Indian sale of goods law. It notes that caveat emptor originally applied, but there are now several exceptions, including when goods are purchased by description, sample, for a particular purpose, or where the seller uses fraud or conceals defects. It provides examples to illustrate exceptions for purchase by description, sample, and merchantable quality.
This document provides an overview of the contracts of bailment and pledge under Indian law. It defines bailment and pledge, distinguishes between the two, and outlines their essential elements. Bailment involves the delivery of goods for a specific purpose, while pledge is a type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for a debt. The document discusses the duties of bailors and bailees, as well as the rights of each party. It also covers related topics like finders of lost goods and provides illustrations of bailment and pledge.
Consideration is something of value that is exchanged between parties to a contract. It is essential for a valid contract. Consideration can be in the form of an act, abstinence from an act, or a promise. It must be something that moves from the promisee at the desire of the promisor. Consideration does not need to be adequate, but it must be real, lawful, and not something the promisor is already obligated to do. Without consideration, there is no valid contract, though there are some exceptions such as natural love and affection or compensation for voluntary services.
This document provides an overview of the law of contracts as it relates to guarantees. It defines a guarantee as a tripartite agreement involving a principal debtor, creditor, and surety where the surety assumes secondary liability for the debt if the principal debtor defaults. The document outlines the essential elements of a valid guarantee contract and distinguishes guarantees from indemnity agreements. It also discusses different types of guarantees like continuing guarantees and how continuing guarantees can be revoked. Overall, the document provides a high-level introduction to key concepts regarding guarantees under contract law in 3 sentences or less.
A quasi-contract is an obligation imposed by law that requires one party to compensate another party. It arises in situations where there is no valid contract but where justice demands compensation be provided. Key features of a quasi-contract include that it is not based on a formal agreement and can only be enforced against specific individuals involved in the situation, not the world at large. Common examples include a plumber mistakenly installing a sprinkler system and then being required to be paid, or goods being left at someone's house by mistake and the person keeping the goods for their own use. The goal of a quasi-contract is to prevent unjust enrichment at another's expense.
An agent is a person authorized to act on behalf of another person called the principal. The relationship between them is called agency. An agency can be created expressly through an agreement or impliedly through actions like ratification or holding out. As an agent, one has duties to follow the principal's instructions, conduct business with care, communicate properly, and not make secret profits. The principal has duties to pay the agent and not interfere without cause. An agency terminates through completion, death, lapse of time, or revocation except if the agency is coupled with an interest of the agent.
The document defines bailment under Indian contract law as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a specific purpose, with the obligation to return the goods. It outlines the key elements of bailment including the bailor, bailee, subject matter, characteristics, essentials, types of bailment, rights and duties of bailor and bailee, and termination of bailment. Bailment involves delivery of movable property, is based on an agreement, and requires return of the goods once the purpose is fulfilled.
Pledge is the bailment of goods as security for repayment of a debt or performance of a promise. The pledger (bailor) delivers possession of movable property to the pledgee (bailee) as security. The pledgee has the right to retain the goods until repayment of the debt and expenses. The pledger can redeem the goods by repaying the debt within the agreed time or any subsequent time before goods are sold. Duties include the pledgee taking reasonable care of goods and the pledger repaying the debt. A non-owner can also pledge goods in some situations like a mercantile agent pledging with owner's consent.
According to Indian contract law, a person must be of the age of majority, of sound mind, and not otherwise legally disqualified to have the capacity to enter into a valid and enforceable contract. A minor, defined as a person under 18 years of age, lacks such capacity and any agreements entered into by a minor are void ab initio. However, a minor can be held liable to pay for necessities provided to them, such as food, clothing, shelter, and services related to education or healthcare. A person of unsound mind, including idiots, lunatics, or those intoxicated, also lacks the capacity to contract if unable to understand the nature and effect of the agreement.
The document outlines the key steps in forming a contract of sale:
1. Identifying the parties and date of agreement.
2. Providing a detailed description of the goods/services, quality, and industry standards.
3. Stating the price, payment terms, schedule, and method.
4. Including details around delivery such as time, place, costs, and liability for damages.
5. Covering additional provisions like warranties, breach, confidentiality, severability, and legal terms.
The document discusses various types of flaws in consent that can make a contract voidable, including coercion, undue influence, misrepresentation, and mistake. It provides definitions and examples of each flaw. For coercion, it discusses threats to commit suicide being considered coercion and the effect of coercion making a contract voidable. For undue influence, it discusses relationships where influence may occur and a case example. It also compares coercion and undue influence. The document further explores the elements needed to establish fraud and misrepresentation, and the effects they have in making a contract voidable. It concludes with discussing bilateral and unilateral mistakes of fact and law.
PPT on "Pledge" for BBA & B.Com 1st year students, CA, CPT, CS & CMA Foundation.
Business Law PPT by Sandeep Sharma.
Meaning with suitable example & explanation.
The document discusses the legal concept of bailment under Indian law. It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a certain purpose based on an agreement to return or dispose of the goods. Key elements of a bailment include delivery of possession of goods, for a specific purpose, and return of the goods. The document outlines the duties of the bailee and bailor, types of bailments, termination of bailment, and the bailee's right to lien over the goods.
This document summarizes key concepts regarding quasi contracts under business legislation. It defines quasi contracts as obligations that are not truly contractual but are treated as such under law. The document outlines 5 types of quasi contracts and provides examples: 1) supply of necessities, 2) payment by an interested person, 3) obligation to pay for non-gratuitous acts, 4) responsibility of finders of goods, and 5) mistakes or coercion. It explains key sections of legislation regarding each type and illustrates concepts with examples. In under 3 sentences, the document summarizes Pakistani business law provisions for quasi-contractual obligations.
The document discusses the law of contract regarding pledge. It defines pledge as a type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for repayment of a debt or performance of a promise. The key elements of a valid pledge are delivery of possession of movable goods to the pawnee (bailee), the goods serving as security for payment of a debt, and an agreement for the goods to be returned upon fulfillment of obligations. The document outlines the rights and duties of the pawnor (bailor) and pawnee regarding pledged goods and circumstances where a valid pledge may exist.
The document defines and distinguishes between a contract of sale and an agreement to sell goods under Indian law. A contract of sale involves the immediate transfer of ownership from the seller to the buyer upon agreement, whereas an agreement to sell involves the future transfer of ownership upon certain conditions being met. The key differences between the two are: (1) a sale is an executed contract while an agreement to sell is executory, (2) risk of loss falls on the buyer in a sale but on the seller in an agreement to sell, and (3) available remedies differ depending on whether it is a sale or agreement to sell in cases of breach or insolvency.
This document summarizes key aspects of contracts of indemnity and guarantee under Indian contract law:
1) A contract of indemnity promises to save another from loss caused by the promisor or third parties, and the indemnified has rights to damages, costs, and sums from any compromise.
2) For a contract of guarantee, a surety guarantees to perform a promise or discharge the liability of a third party (principal debtor) if they default, with the creditor as the other party.
3) A surety's liability is secondary and coextensive with the principal debtor, including all costs, and the surety has rights against the creditor and principal debtor, including rights
This document discusses the legal concepts of bailment and pledge. It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a specific purpose, to be returned after. The person delivering the goods is the bailor and the person receiving is the bailee. Bailment can be gratuitous (without compensation) or non-gratuitous. Pledge is a type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for a debt. The person delivering the goods is the pawnor and receiving is the pawnee. The document outlines the duties and rights of bailors/pawnees and bailees/pawnees, and provides examples to distinguish between bailment and pledge
The document discusses the doctrine of caveat emptor, or "let the buyer beware." It states that under this doctrine, there is no implied warranty on the quality or fitness of goods unless exceptions apply. The exceptions include misrepresentation by the seller, concealment of latent defects, sale by description or sample that does not match, and goods intended for a particular purpose or required to have merchantable quality. While caveat emptor was important historically, its rigors have been mitigated by modern legislation, competition, and consumer awareness. The relevance of caveat emptor has declined and should be replaced by "caveat vendor," or let the seller beware.
The document discusses the concept of indemnity under Indian contract law. It defines an indemnity as a contract where one party promises to save the other from loss caused by the promisor or any other person. The essential elements of an indemnity include a loss, two parties (indemnifier and indemnity holder), and containing the essentials of a valid contract. An indemnity holder whose suffers a loss covered by the indemnity terms can recover damages, costs, and sums paid under compromise from the indemnifier. Common law principles also apply to interpreting indemnity clauses unless in conflict with statute. The rights of indemnifiers include subrogation and not compensating for uncovered losses.
This document discusses contracts of indemnity and guarantee. It defines a contract of indemnity as one where one party promises to save the other from loss caused by the promisor or a third party. In a contract of guarantee, a surety promises to be liable if a principal debtor defaults. There are three parties in a guarantee - the surety, principal debtor, and creditor. The surety has secondary liability while the principal debtor has primary liability. The document outlines rights and liabilities of parties, types of guarantees, essentials of valid contracts, and circumstances for discharge of liability.
This document discusses the concept of consideration in contract law. It defines consideration as "something in return" that has value in the eyes of the law. Consideration is essential to forming a valid, enforceable contract. There are several key elements for consideration: it must move from the promisee or another person at the request of the promisor; it can be past, present or future; it does not need to be adequate but must be real and lawful. Exceptions to the requirement of consideration include gifts, charity contributions, and contracts supported by natural love and affection if certain conditions are met.
Contingent contracts are agreements that are dependent on the occurrence or non-occurrence of some future uncertain event, and performance under such contracts can only be enforced after the event in question has occurred or become impossible. The document outlines the essential elements and types of contingent contracts under Indian contract law, and explains the circumstances under which contingent contracts become void or enforceable.
This document discusses contracts of indemnity and guarantee under Indian contract law. It defines a contract of indemnity as one where one party promises to save the other from losses caused by the promisor or a third party. It provides an example of Mr. A failing to return to India as promised, making him liable to reimburse the government. It also outlines essential elements, rights of indemnified parties, and types of guarantees.
1. The document discusses the legal concept of bailment, where a person (the bailor) delivers goods to another person (the bailee) for a specific purpose.
2. It provides details on various bailment cases, including lost baggage by an airline, goods lost by a dry cleaner, and goods damaged while being repaired.
3. The key principles are that the bailee is responsible for returning the bailed goods or compensating for any loss or damage, unless there is a special contract stating otherwise or the bailee exercised the level of care a reasonable person would for their own goods.
This document discusses the legal concepts of bailment and pledge. It defines bailment as when the owner of goods gives custody and possession of the goods to another person through a contract, to be returned later. The owner is the bailor and the person receiving the goods is the bailee. There are various types of bailments and rights and duties of both the bailor and bailee. Pledge is a special type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for repayment of a debt, with the pawner being the bailor and pawnee the bailee. The document provides details on the rights and duties of both parties in a pledge, as well as examples of cases involving issues of bailment
Pledge is the bailment of goods as security for repayment of a debt or performance of a promise. The pledger (bailor) delivers possession of movable property to the pledgee (bailee) as security. The pledgee has the right to retain the goods until repayment of the debt and expenses. The pledger can redeem the goods by repaying the debt within the agreed time or any subsequent time before goods are sold. Duties include the pledgee taking reasonable care of goods and the pledger repaying the debt. A non-owner can also pledge goods in some situations like a mercantile agent pledging with owner's consent.
According to Indian contract law, a person must be of the age of majority, of sound mind, and not otherwise legally disqualified to have the capacity to enter into a valid and enforceable contract. A minor, defined as a person under 18 years of age, lacks such capacity and any agreements entered into by a minor are void ab initio. However, a minor can be held liable to pay for necessities provided to them, such as food, clothing, shelter, and services related to education or healthcare. A person of unsound mind, including idiots, lunatics, or those intoxicated, also lacks the capacity to contract if unable to understand the nature and effect of the agreement.
The document outlines the key steps in forming a contract of sale:
1. Identifying the parties and date of agreement.
2. Providing a detailed description of the goods/services, quality, and industry standards.
3. Stating the price, payment terms, schedule, and method.
4. Including details around delivery such as time, place, costs, and liability for damages.
5. Covering additional provisions like warranties, breach, confidentiality, severability, and legal terms.
The document discusses various types of flaws in consent that can make a contract voidable, including coercion, undue influence, misrepresentation, and mistake. It provides definitions and examples of each flaw. For coercion, it discusses threats to commit suicide being considered coercion and the effect of coercion making a contract voidable. For undue influence, it discusses relationships where influence may occur and a case example. It also compares coercion and undue influence. The document further explores the elements needed to establish fraud and misrepresentation, and the effects they have in making a contract voidable. It concludes with discussing bilateral and unilateral mistakes of fact and law.
PPT on "Pledge" for BBA & B.Com 1st year students, CA, CPT, CS & CMA Foundation.
Business Law PPT by Sandeep Sharma.
Meaning with suitable example & explanation.
The document discusses the legal concept of bailment under Indian law. It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a certain purpose based on an agreement to return or dispose of the goods. Key elements of a bailment include delivery of possession of goods, for a specific purpose, and return of the goods. The document outlines the duties of the bailee and bailor, types of bailments, termination of bailment, and the bailee's right to lien over the goods.
This document summarizes key concepts regarding quasi contracts under business legislation. It defines quasi contracts as obligations that are not truly contractual but are treated as such under law. The document outlines 5 types of quasi contracts and provides examples: 1) supply of necessities, 2) payment by an interested person, 3) obligation to pay for non-gratuitous acts, 4) responsibility of finders of goods, and 5) mistakes or coercion. It explains key sections of legislation regarding each type and illustrates concepts with examples. In under 3 sentences, the document summarizes Pakistani business law provisions for quasi-contractual obligations.
The document discusses the law of contract regarding pledge. It defines pledge as a type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for repayment of a debt or performance of a promise. The key elements of a valid pledge are delivery of possession of movable goods to the pawnee (bailee), the goods serving as security for payment of a debt, and an agreement for the goods to be returned upon fulfillment of obligations. The document outlines the rights and duties of the pawnor (bailor) and pawnee regarding pledged goods and circumstances where a valid pledge may exist.
The document defines and distinguishes between a contract of sale and an agreement to sell goods under Indian law. A contract of sale involves the immediate transfer of ownership from the seller to the buyer upon agreement, whereas an agreement to sell involves the future transfer of ownership upon certain conditions being met. The key differences between the two are: (1) a sale is an executed contract while an agreement to sell is executory, (2) risk of loss falls on the buyer in a sale but on the seller in an agreement to sell, and (3) available remedies differ depending on whether it is a sale or agreement to sell in cases of breach or insolvency.
This document summarizes key aspects of contracts of indemnity and guarantee under Indian contract law:
1) A contract of indemnity promises to save another from loss caused by the promisor or third parties, and the indemnified has rights to damages, costs, and sums from any compromise.
2) For a contract of guarantee, a surety guarantees to perform a promise or discharge the liability of a third party (principal debtor) if they default, with the creditor as the other party.
3) A surety's liability is secondary and coextensive with the principal debtor, including all costs, and the surety has rights against the creditor and principal debtor, including rights
This document discusses the legal concepts of bailment and pledge. It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a specific purpose, to be returned after. The person delivering the goods is the bailor and the person receiving is the bailee. Bailment can be gratuitous (without compensation) or non-gratuitous. Pledge is a type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for a debt. The person delivering the goods is the pawnor and receiving is the pawnee. The document outlines the duties and rights of bailors/pawnees and bailees/pawnees, and provides examples to distinguish between bailment and pledge
The document discusses the doctrine of caveat emptor, or "let the buyer beware." It states that under this doctrine, there is no implied warranty on the quality or fitness of goods unless exceptions apply. The exceptions include misrepresentation by the seller, concealment of latent defects, sale by description or sample that does not match, and goods intended for a particular purpose or required to have merchantable quality. While caveat emptor was important historically, its rigors have been mitigated by modern legislation, competition, and consumer awareness. The relevance of caveat emptor has declined and should be replaced by "caveat vendor," or let the seller beware.
The document discusses the concept of indemnity under Indian contract law. It defines an indemnity as a contract where one party promises to save the other from loss caused by the promisor or any other person. The essential elements of an indemnity include a loss, two parties (indemnifier and indemnity holder), and containing the essentials of a valid contract. An indemnity holder whose suffers a loss covered by the indemnity terms can recover damages, costs, and sums paid under compromise from the indemnifier. Common law principles also apply to interpreting indemnity clauses unless in conflict with statute. The rights of indemnifiers include subrogation and not compensating for uncovered losses.
This document discusses contracts of indemnity and guarantee. It defines a contract of indemnity as one where one party promises to save the other from loss caused by the promisor or a third party. In a contract of guarantee, a surety promises to be liable if a principal debtor defaults. There are three parties in a guarantee - the surety, principal debtor, and creditor. The surety has secondary liability while the principal debtor has primary liability. The document outlines rights and liabilities of parties, types of guarantees, essentials of valid contracts, and circumstances for discharge of liability.
This document discusses the concept of consideration in contract law. It defines consideration as "something in return" that has value in the eyes of the law. Consideration is essential to forming a valid, enforceable contract. There are several key elements for consideration: it must move from the promisee or another person at the request of the promisor; it can be past, present or future; it does not need to be adequate but must be real and lawful. Exceptions to the requirement of consideration include gifts, charity contributions, and contracts supported by natural love and affection if certain conditions are met.
Contingent contracts are agreements that are dependent on the occurrence or non-occurrence of some future uncertain event, and performance under such contracts can only be enforced after the event in question has occurred or become impossible. The document outlines the essential elements and types of contingent contracts under Indian contract law, and explains the circumstances under which contingent contracts become void or enforceable.
This document discusses contracts of indemnity and guarantee under Indian contract law. It defines a contract of indemnity as one where one party promises to save the other from losses caused by the promisor or a third party. It provides an example of Mr. A failing to return to India as promised, making him liable to reimburse the government. It also outlines essential elements, rights of indemnified parties, and types of guarantees.
1. The document discusses the legal concept of bailment, where a person (the bailor) delivers goods to another person (the bailee) for a specific purpose.
2. It provides details on various bailment cases, including lost baggage by an airline, goods lost by a dry cleaner, and goods damaged while being repaired.
3. The key principles are that the bailee is responsible for returning the bailed goods or compensating for any loss or damage, unless there is a special contract stating otherwise or the bailee exercised the level of care a reasonable person would for their own goods.
This document discusses the legal concepts of bailment and pledge. It defines bailment as when the owner of goods gives custody and possession of the goods to another person through a contract, to be returned later. The owner is the bailor and the person receiving the goods is the bailee. There are various types of bailments and rights and duties of both the bailor and bailee. Pledge is a special type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for repayment of a debt, with the pawner being the bailor and pawnee the bailee. The document provides details on the rights and duties of both parties in a pledge, as well as examples of cases involving issues of bailment
Description about Bialment,pledge,pawner and pawnee pledge by Non-Owners.All the informaion aboou ahe bailment and pledge ,pawner and pawnee with including their rights and duties of bailor and Bailee ,pawner and pawnee,and also expalained about difference betweenBailment and Pledge.
Learning Outcome: After completion of this lesson, students will be able to -
1) identify and distinguish between conditions and warranties
2) learn about implied conditions and implied warranties available under Sale of Goods Act
3) determine when ownership of a property passes during a sale
This document provides information about the key aspects of bailment under Indian law. It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose upon terms that the goods will be returned or disposed of when the purpose is complete. It outlines the essential elements of a bailment contract including delivery of goods, transfer of possession only, and return of the specific goods. It also discusses the rights and duties of the bailor and bailee. The bailor's rights include claiming damages for negligence while the bailee's rights include recovering expenses incurred. Both parties have duties to take care of the goods and return them once the purpose is fulfilled.
Rights and duties of pawnor and Pawneeeevivekviv85574
The document outlines the rights and duties of a pawnor (person who pledges goods as security) and pawnee (person who receives the pledged goods) under a contract of pledge in India. It defines key terms and discusses the pawnor's rights like right to redeem goods and compensation. It also discusses the pawnee's rights like right of retainer and right to sell goods in case of default. The duties of both parties are also explained, such as the pawnor's duty to disclose defects and the pawnee's duty to take reasonable care of goods. In conclusion, it emphasizes both parties must understand their rights and duties to ensure a lawful contractual relationship.
Bailment is the delivery of goods by one person to another for a purpose upon terms that the goods will be returned or disposed of when the purpose is accomplished. Key types are gratuitous (without payment) and non-gratuitous bailments. Bailors and bailees have duties to care for goods, not use them without authorization, and return them. Finders of lost goods are treated as bailees and have duties to preserve goods and locate the owner. Pledge is a type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for a debt, with the pawner and pawnee having duties around repayment and return of pledged goods.
This document provides an overview of bailment under business law. It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a specific purpose, where only possession and not ownership is transferred. It outlines the key parties in a bailment as the bailor who delivers the goods and the bailee who receives them. Some essential elements of a bailment are that there must be a contract, delivery of possession of goods, and the goods must be returned once the purpose is fulfilled. The document also discusses the different types of bailment, the rights and duties of the bailor and bailee, and how bailment differs from agency.
This document discusses bailment and pledge under Indian contract law. It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a specific purpose, where the goods must later be returned or disposed of according to the bailor's instructions. Bailment can be gratuitous (without payment) or for reward. Pledge is a type of bailment where goods are delivered as security for a debt. The key differences between bailment and pledge are that in pledge the delivery is specifically for security, and the pledgee can sell the pledged goods if the pledger defaults. The document outlines the duties of bailors and bailees/pledgees, as well as their rights such as lien and the pledgee
This document discusses contracts of bailment and pledge under Indian law. It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a purpose, upon agreement to return or dispose of the goods according to the bailor's instructions. The key elements of a bailment are a contract, delivery of possession of goods, for a purpose, and return of the specific goods. Bailments can be classified based on benefit to the parties or whether consideration is involved. The duties of bailors include disclosing known faults and indemnifying the bailee. Bailees' duties are to take reasonable care of goods and not make unauthorized use of them. Rights of bailors and bailees are also outlined. Lien
This document defines and explains the contract of bailment under Indian law. It begins by defining bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a specific purpose where possession, but not ownership, is transferred. It then outlines the key features of a valid bailment contract including agreement between the parties, delivery of movable goods, a definite purpose, and return of the goods.
The document further details the rights and duties of bailors and bailees. Bailors have the right to claim damages or terminate the contract if terms are breached, while bailees have duties to take reasonable care of goods and return them after the purpose is fulfilled. Pledge is described as a type of bailment where
1) The seller is liable if goods are not of merchantable quality and not saleable under their description, as in the case of contaminated beer being sold in a pub.
2) For the sale of goods, the law implies that goods are fit for their intended purpose, as seen in the case of defective copper sheeting sold to sheath a ship.
3) However, no implied condition exists that goods are fit for an abnormal undisclosed purpose, such as a tweed coat irritating unusually sensitive skin.
The document discusses the key aspects of bailment and agency under Indian contract law.
It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a specific purpose, to be returned after. The essentials of a valid bailment are delivery of possession, delivery under a contract, delivery for a specific purpose, and return of goods. It outlines the duties of the bailee and bailor as well as the rights of the bailee.
It also defines agency as a contract where one person appoints another to act on their behalf. The principal is the person appointing the agent, while the agent acts for the principal. Consideration is not necessary to create an agency relationship.
This document defines and explains the key concepts of a bailment contract under Indian contract law. It outlines that a bailment is the delivery of goods by one person to another for a specific purpose, with an obligation to return the goods. The main parties are the bailor who delivers the goods and the bailee who receives them. It also describes the essential elements of a valid bailment contract, the different types of bailments, and the duties and rights of both the bailor and bailee.
Bailment Originated from a French word Bailer which means to deliver . Sec 48 to171 of the Indian Contract act 1872,contain the provision relating to contract of bailment .
This document discusses contracts of bailment and pledge under Indian law. It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a purpose, upon agreement to return the goods. It outlines the requisites of a valid bailment contract and classifies bailments. It also discusses the duties of bailors and bailees, as well as their rights. Pledge is defined as a bailment of goods as security for a debt or promise. The document compares bailment and pledge and outlines the rights of pawnees and pawnors.
This document discusses contracts of bailment and pledge under Indian law. It defines bailment as the delivery of goods by one person to another for a purpose, upon agreement to return or dispose of the goods. The key elements of a bailment are a contract, delivery of possession of goods, and agreement for return or disposal of goods. Bailments can be classified based on benefit to parties or whether consideration is involved. The duties of bailors include disclosing faults, bearing expenses, and indemnifying the bailee. Bailees' duties are to take reasonable care of goods and not make unauthorized use. Rights of both parties and rules around liens and finders of goods are also outlined.
This document discusses key provisions regarding the performance of contracts for the sale of goods under Indian law. It outlines the duties of buyers and sellers to deliver goods and make payment. Key points covered include rules for delivery, including time, place, and third party possession. It also discusses delivery of incorrect quantities, installment delivery, delivery to carriers, risk of loss, the buyer's right to examine goods, rejection of non-conforming goods, and liability for refusing delivery.
The document discusses key aspects of transfer of title in a contract of sale under Indian law. It explains that transfer of title occurs when the property in the goods passes from the seller to the buyer, and outlines factors that determine when this occurs such as the parties' intent, whether the goods are specific/ascertained, and whether appropriation has taken place. Key provisions and sections of the Sale of Goods Act are summarized, including rules for determining when title passes in different situations. Exceptions to the nemo dat quod non habet principle are also covered.
The document discusses key aspects of the Sale of Goods Act 1930 in India. It begins by introducing the Act and noting that it standardized the law around sale of goods. It then discusses several important sections of the Act regarding what constitutes a sale, exceptions, goods that are the subject of sale, implied conditions, and the distinction between conditions and warranties. Throughout it provides explanations and examples to illustrate how the Act addresses various scenarios that can arise in contracts for the sale of goods.
The document summarizes key sections of the Indian Partnership Act relating to registration of firms. Some key points:
- Firms can register by submitting a statement with details like firm name, addresses, partners' names and dates of joining to the Registrar of the area where the firm has a place of business.
- The register records changes like alterations in firm name/address, opening/closing of branches, changes in partners' names/addresses or the firm's constitution.
- Non-registration means firms cannot file suits to enforce contract rights or bring claims against third parties, though suits for dissolution/accounts are allowed. Firms can get registered to remove these disabilities.
- False statements in
The document discusses the dissolution of a firm under Indian partnership law. It defines dissolution as when all partners stop carrying on partnership business. There are several modes of dissolution, including by agreement between partners, compulsory dissolution due to insolvency or illegality, and dissolution ordered by the court. Upon dissolution, partners' authority and liabilities continue for winding up unfinished business. The property of the firm is used to pay debts before distributing surplus among partners.
- An incoming partner is not liable for acts of the firm done before they became a partner, unless they contractually agree to assume liability for past debts.
- An outgoing partner can leave the firm with consent of other partners, by express agreement between partners, or by giving notice if the partnership is at will.
- An outgoing partner remains liable for acts of the firm done before they left, but not after, unless public notice of their departure has not yet been given.
- The rights of an outgoing partner include potentially competing with the firm after leaving, subject to any agreement not to, and potentially sharing in subsequent profits if the business continues using their share of the firm's property.
This document defines and describes different types of partners and partnerships. It discusses active/managing partners who take an active role in running the business, sleeping/dormant partners who do not participate but share profits and losses, nominal partners who only lend their name, and partners in profit only who only share profits. It also covers minor partners, partners by estoppel, partnerships by duration (at will or fixed term), and partnerships by extent of business (general or particular).
- Partners have implied authority to bind the firm for acts done in the usual course of business. However, this authority does not extend to certain acts like submitting disputes to arbitration or acquiring immovable property without express consent.
- The doctrine of holding out makes a person liable as a partner if they represent themselves as a partner or knowingly allow others to represent them as such, and a third party gives credit to the firm based on this representation.
- A minor can be admitted to the benefits of a partnership with the consent of all partners but is not personally liable for acts of the firm. They have rights to profits and inspection of accounts.
The Unorganized Workers' Social Security Act has several pitfalls and drawbacks:
1. It excludes large sections of unorganized workers like agricultural laborers and contract workers. The definition of "unorganized worker" is too narrow.
2. Defining "unorganized sector" as establishments with less than 10 workers is arbitrary and violates the right to equality.
3. The Act does not actually provide social security to workers, as the name implies, but only registration. The social security schemes are only for below poverty line workers, leaving out many urban unorganized workers.
4. There is no provision for a social security fund, casting doubts on the government's intentions to deliver social security rights. Funding
This document discusses social security for unorganized workers in India. It begins by discussing the International Labour Organization's emphasis on comprehensive social security. It then discusses social security provisions in the Indian constitution. It defines unorganized workers and sectors in India, which make up 93% of the workforce. The document outlines various central and state government welfare schemes for unorganized workers relating to health insurance, life insurance, pensions, housing, education, skills training, and more. It discusses the implementation of the Unorganized Workers Social Security Act of 2008 which established boards to formulate and review social security schemes.
This document discusses the concept of wages in India. It provides a history of wages in India from the early 20th century strikes led by Gandhi to establish fair wages, to the various committees and acts that aimed to define minimum, living and fair wages. It also discusses theories of wage determination such as subsistence theory, wage fund theory, surplus value theory, and others. The document examines the definitions and factors considered in setting minimum, living and fair wages in India.
This document summarizes the key aspects of the Maternity Benefit Act of 1961 in India and its amendments over time. It discusses how the Act prohibits employment of women during pregnancy and provides maternity benefits. It outlines entitlement to 6 weeks of paid leave before and after delivery. It also summarizes some key court cases related to the application of the Act and highlights its coverage of contractual workers. The document aims to give an overview of the evolution and provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act in India.
The document summarizes the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act of 1986 and its subsequent amendments in India. Some key points:
- The original 1986 act defined a child as under 14 and aimed to regulate their work conditions and prohibit hazardous work.
- Major amendments in 2016 and 2017 include a complete ban on employment of children under 14, regulating adolescent (14-18 years) work, and specifying hazardous occupations prohibited for adolescents.
- It establishes penalties for violations and provides for rescue and rehabilitation of working children. The amendments expanded protections for children and adolescents from hazardous work conditions.
This document outlines the Special Economic Zone Act of 2005 in India. Some key points:
1. Special Economic Zones (SEZs) are geographical regions with more liberal economic laws than the country to promote development and attract investment.
2. The Act provides procedures for establishing SEZs, including submitting proposals to State and Central governments for approval. It also defines developers and coordinators of SEZs.
3. The Act exempts goods and services exported from or imported into SEZs from various taxes and duties to encourage business activity. It demarcates processing areas within SEZs for manufacturing and services.
The document summarizes the key aspects of the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act 1961, including:
- It applies to shops and commercial establishments across Karnataka and sets rules for their registration and operation.
- It defines important terms like "employee", "employer", "establishment", and exempts some categories like family businesses and government offices.
- Employers must register new establishments with inspectors within 30 days and notify any changes. Closures also require notification.
- The act limits employees' daily work to 9 hours and weekly work to 48 hours, with some provisions for overtime.
The Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 was passed to provide social security to employees in industries by establishing a compulsory provident fund. The Act applies to establishments with 20 or more employees across industries like cement, cigarettes, engineering etc. It requires both employers and employees to contribute 12% each of the employee's basic wages to the provident fund. Several amendments have been made over time to introduce provisions like family pension schemes and deposit linked insurance schemes. The Act is administered by the Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organisation with representation from government, employers and employees.
The Payment of Gratuity Act 1972 provides for a scheme of gratuity payments to employees in establishments with 10 or more employees. Gratuity is calculated at 15 days wages for each completed year of service, with a maximum limit set by the government. To be eligible, an employee must have 5 years of continuous service, though this is waived in cases of death or disablement. Continuous service includes periods of absence like leave, sickness, or temporary disablement. Gratuity is paid to employees on superannuation, retirement, resignation, or death and in cases of death to nominees or legal heirs.
This document discusses the concept of bonus in India. Some key points:
- Bonus payments began in 1917 as "war bonuses" but became more standardized over time.
- Court rulings in the 1950s established that employees have a right to claim bonus payments, as profits are a result of combined labor and capital.
- The Payment of Bonus Act of 1965 was enacted to regulate bonus payments, setting a minimum and formula for calculating available surplus.
- Under the formula, gross profits are calculated according to schedules, then prior charges like taxes and depreciation are deducted to determine available surplus. A percentage of surplus is the allocable bonus amount payable to employees.
The document provides an overview of the Minimum Wages Act of 1948 in India. Some key points:
- The act was created to set minimum wages in industries where workers have little bargaining power and are not well-organized. It aims to provide an irreducible level of wages to meet basic necessities like food, shelter and clothing.
- Minimum wages can vary between states and locations. The act establishes a machinery for determining minimum wage rates in scheduled employments.
- It defines important terms like "employer", "wages", and outlines the process for fixing and revising minimum wages, which includes appointing committees to advise the government.
- Minimum wages are fixed considering factors like location, age,
The document discusses the concept of wages in India from its early history to modern theories. It covers:
- Early wage disputes in India and the role of committees like the Whitley Commission in examining wage issues.
- The evolution of minimum wage laws in India from the Industrial Policy Resolution of 1948 to the Minimum Wages Act.
- Different types of wages like minimum wage, living wage, and fair wage as defined by courts and committees.
- Theories of wage determination such as subsistence theory, wage fund theory, and surplus value theory.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaintsseoglobal20
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Frameworkdevaki57
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
2. Contract of Bailment
Section 148: defines Bailment: a bailment is the
delivering of goods by one person to another for some
purpose upon a contract that they shall, when the
purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise
disposed of according to the directions of the person
delivering them.
The person delivering the goods is called the Bailor.
The person to whom they are delivered is called
Bailee.
It is not always necessary that possession of the
goods be delivered to the bailee. If he is already in
possession of the goods of another, he may contract
to become a bailee by way of bailment.
3. Essential elements of valid Bailment
1) Delivery of goods by the bailor:
Ex: Ultzen V Nicols:
Facts: Plaintiff went to a restaurant to have his dinner. As
a voluntary courtesy, a waiter, took the overcoat of the
plaintiff and hung it on a hook behind the chair where the
plaintiff dined. After having dined, when the plaintiff
wanted to leave, he found that his overcoat was missing.
He sued the owner off the restaurant for the loss of the
coat.
Held: the owner of restaurant was liable because by
taking the overcoat, although by voluntary courtesy, the
waiter had assumed the responsibility of the bailee.
4. Section 149
The delivery to the bailee may be made by doing
anything which has the effect of putting in the
possession of the intended bailee or of any person
authorized to hold them on his behalf.
Delivery of goods may be actual or constructive
delivery.
Kaliaperumal v Visalakshmi Achi AIR 1938 Mad 42
Facts: A lady engaged a goldsmith for melting old
jewelry to make some new ornaments. She delivered
the old jewelery to the gold smith but every evening
after the day’s work was over, she used to take the half
made jewelleries from the goldsmith and after putting
them in a box with a lock left it in a room of the
goldsmith while retaining the key with her.
5. Continue..
One morning she found the jewelleries had been
stolen. She sued the goldsmith for the loss of
jewelleries.
Held: the goldsmith was not liable for the loss of
jewelleries because each evening there was re-
delivery of the jewelleries to the lady and
consequently when they were stolen, They are not
in possession of the goldsmith.
HC : held that delivery is an essential element of
bailment and mere leaving box in the room of
goldsmith while she retained the key, did not
constitute delivery within the meaning of section
149.
6. Elements continued..
2) Delivery of Possession upon a contract:
SC on sec148: State of Gujrat V Memon Mohammed:
Certain goods were seized by custom officials, were
sold as unclaimed property. Subsequently seizure were
found unsustainable.
Held: Government was held liable for the loss of goods
although the goods were not delivered to them on
contract.
SC: they were in position of bailee. It is wrong to say
that there cannot be a bailment without an enforceable
contract.
7. Continued..
The term “contract” in section 148 does not mean that there
should always be a formal contract. It may also be implied.
Jubliee Mills Ltd V Gov General of India in Council AIR 1953
Bom 46.
Facts: the Raily admin had permitted the plaintiff to keep certain
bale of cotton on the platform as no wagons were available. The
bales of cotton were damaged by a spark emanating from a
passing engine.
Held: Raily admin were liable for by allowing the Plaintiff to keep
the goods at platform, and that they assumed responsibility of a
bailee.
8. Elements continued..
3) Bailee bound to return goods or to dispose of according
to the direction of Bailor:
United Breweries Ltd V State of AP(1997) AIR SC 1414: the
appellant sold beers in bottles to the customers. The customers
were required to pay cost of beer and to deposit a sum for bottles
which was refundable. The customers were advised to collect
empty bottles from the consumers and return them to the App
and get back their deposit for the bottle. For this purpose the App
issued a circular to its buyers which stated:-
The refundable deposits were being collected on the bottles and
the crates.
The app advised their customers to collect 40 paise per bottle
from the customers as deposit.
The customers were advised to collect the empty bottles from the
consumers and return it to app
9. Continued..
The bottles were to be collected by trucks of the App, who were
also authorized to issue a receipt against which the app would
issue a credit notes. In next booking the customers would get
advantage of these credit notes.
Held: it was found that the scheme of recycling the bottles and
crates would keep down the costs and ultimately would have the
effect of reducing the price of beer and encouraging the
customers to buy beer in large quantities. It was also found that
the rate at which customers were required to make the deposit of
the bottles was less than the cost of the beer bottles.
The SC concluded that the intention of the brewer did not appear
to have been to sell the beer bottles, on the contrary the brewer
was trying to ensure that the bottles in which the beer was
supplied to consumers through its customers were brought back
to it so that they could be used again. Thus there was no sale of
bottles but only a bailment.
10. Kalyani Breweries Ltd V State of West Bengal
Facts: The App brewed and sold beer in
bottles and the customers were required pay
the exact cost of the bottles, apart from the
price of the contents. The empty bottles could
be retained by the customers, but if any
customer wanted to return the bottles, the
exact cost of the bottles paid by him was to be
refunded to him.
Held: there was only sale of bottles, rather
than bailment. The deposit amount of bottles
was therefore, liable to sale tax.
11. Duties of bailor
Section 150: classifies bailors as:-
A gratuitous bailor ಅನಪ ೇಕ್ಶಿತ
A bailor for reward ಅಪ ೇಕ್ಶಿತ
A gratuitous bailor is one who lends his goods
without consideration. Since he receives no
consideration, his duty is much less than that of a
bailor for reward. He is bound to disclose to the bailee
the fault in the goods bailed. He is liable to disclose
the faults which he is aware and which interferes in its
use. He is not liable for faults or defects in the goods
lent of which he is not aware.
12. Bailor for Reward
Section 150: if the goods are bailed for hire the
bailor is responsible for such damage, whether
he was or was not aware of the existence of such
faults in the goods bailed.
A hires a motor car from B. the car has defective
brakes and is unsafe though B is not aware of it
and A is injured. B is liable to compensate for the
injury because according to section 150 a bailor
for reward is responsible for such damage and it
is immaterial whether he was aware or not aware
of the existence of fault in the goods bailed.
13. Other duties
Section 158: where, by the condition of the bailment,
the goods are to be kept or to be carried or to have
work done upon them by the bailee for the bailor, the
bailee is to receive no remuneration then it is the
bailor duty to repay the bailee the necessary
expenses incurred by him for the purpose of bailment.
Section 164: the bailor is responsible to bailee for any
loss which the bailee may sustain by reason that the
bailor was not entitled to make the bailment or to
receive back the goods or to give directions
respecting them.
14. Duties of bailee
1. Duty of reasonable care
2. Duty to return the goods bailed
3. Duty to make proper use of the goods bailed
4. Duty not to mix his own goods with the goods of
bailor
5. Duty to deliver any increase or profit to the bailor.
6. Duty not to question the title of the bailor.
15. Duties of Bailee
1) Duty of Reasonable care
English law maintains two categories a) bailee for reward
and bailee without reward
Martin V London County Council
Facts: the P was admitted as a patient to the paid hospital
of the defendant. After being admitted, she entrusted a
gold necklace and a cigarette case to the officials of the
hospital. The said officials kept it in a safe where they were
stolen.
Held: the D were liable because they were guilty of not
having taken as much care as was required from the
nature and quality of articles deposited with them.
16. Continued..
The gratuitous bailee will be liable only if he is guilty of
willful or gross negligence.
But in modern period courts apply the same standard
of care for both types of bailee.
In India: Section 151: it does not make any such
distinction.
In all cases of bailment the bailee is bound to take as
much care of goods bailed to him as a man of ordinary
prudence would, under similar circumstances, take
care of his own goods of the same bulk, quality and
value as the goods bailed.
17. Calcutta Credit Corporation Ltd V Prince Peter of Greece
AIR 1964 Cal 374
Facts: A car received for repairs by an automobile garage was
damaged by fire. The garage was a structure, walled by wooden
planks. In the garage were put not only vehicles containing
petrol but also other combustibles like thinners and paints. The
garage was partitioned by wooden walls and a part of it was
allowed to be used for cooking purpose. There was inadequate
arrangement for extinguishing fire. The room in which P’s car
was parked could not be opened for 15 min after the fire was
noticed, as the keys of the room were not available.
The Defendant pleaded that P had knowledge that the car was
parked in a certain way and that estoppel should apply against
them. Volenti non fit injuria applies.
Held: Defendants were liable as they have not taken due care.
18. Continued.
If he has taken the amount of care expected
of him under section 151 he is not liable.
Section 152: he will not be liable for the
loss, destruction, or deterioration of the
thing bailed. But if there is a special contract
fixing the responsibility of the bailee for
such loss, or destruction or deterioration of
the thing bailed then he may be liable for
the same.
19. UOI V Amar Singh AIR 1960 SC233
Facts: some goods were consigned from Quetta
in Pakistan to New Delhi. After the goods were
carried by Pakistan Raly, they were carried by
Indian Rly as the forwarding Rly. The goods were
lost in the transit. The liability of forwarding Rly is
governed by section 72 of Rly act, according to
which liability for the loss of goods bailed to the
Rly is subject to provisions Rly act, and that
bailee under sec 151,152 and 161 of ICA.
SC: Held: the Indian Rly is guilty of negligence
for they did not take as much care of the goods
as an ordinary man would have taken of his own
goods
20. Involuntary Bailee
There may also be situations wherein a person may
become a bailee without his choice or consent. Such
a bailee is called involuntary bailee. Such a bailee
will not be liable for mere negligence.
A play writer sent a manuscript of a play to a
producer who had never asked for it and he lost it,
the producer is not liable.
Finder of goods: Section 71: A person who finds
goods belonging to another and takes them in to his
custody, is subject to the same responsibility as a
bailee.
21. Finder of goods
Section 169: the finder of goods
may sell the goods found:
If the thing is in danger of perishing
or of losing the greater part of its
value or
When the lawful charges of the
finder in respect of the thing found
amount to 2/3rd of its value.
22. 2. Duty to return the goods bailed
Section 160: It is the duty of the bailee, to return, or
deliver according to the bailor’s directions the goods
bailed without demand, as soon as the time for which
they bailed has expired, or the purpose for which they
were bailed has been accomplished.
Section 161: if the goods are not returned, delivered
or tendered at the proper time because of the default
of bailee, he will be responsible to the bailor for any
loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods from
that time.
23. 3. Duty to make proper use of the goods bailed
Section 153: the bailee is to make proper use
of goods bailed to him. A contract of balment
is voidable at the option of the bailor, If the
bailee does any act with regard to the goods
bailed, inconsistent with the conditions of
bailment.
Section 154: if the bailee makes any use of
the goods bailed, which is not according to
the conditions of the bailment, he is liable to
make compensation to the bailor for any
damage arising to the goods from or during
such use of them.
24. 4. Duty not to mix his own goods with the goods of the Bailor
If the goods are not separable.
If the goods are separable.
Section 155: it is the duty of the bailee not to mix his
own goods with the goods of the bailor. But if he does
so with the consent of the bailor, then both he and the
bailor shall have an interest, in proportion to their
respective shares, in the mixture thus produced.
Section 156: if he does so without the consent of the
bailor, and the goods are separable, the property in
the goods shall remain with the parties and the bailee
shall be bound to bear the expenses of separation
and also any damage arising from the mixture.
25. 5. Duty to pay increase or profit to the Bailor
Section 163: A bailee is bound not only to return the
goods bailed but is also under obligation to return any
increase or profit which accrued from the goods
bailed.
A leaves a cow in the custody of B to be taken care
of. The cow has a calf. B is bound to deliver the calf
as well as the cow to A.
26. 6.Duty not to question the title of bailor
Section 166: if the bailor has no title to the goods and the
bailee, in good faith delivers them back to, or according to
the directions of the bailor, the bailee is not responsible to
the true owner in respect of such delivery.
Section 167: if a person, other than the bailor, claims
goods bailed, the proper procedure for him to apply to the
court to stop delivery of the goods to the bailor, and to
decide the title to goods.
In case of several joint bailors/owners: if several joint
owners of goods bail them, the bailee may deliver them
back to or according to the directions of one joint owner
without the consent of all in the absence of any agreement
to contrary.
27. Rights of Bailee
Section 158: Right to recover necessary expenses
incurred on bailment.
where, by the condition of the bailment, the goods are to
be kept or to be carried or to have work done upon them
by the bailee for the bailor, the bailee is to receive no
remuneration then it is the bailor duty to repay the bailee
the necessary expenses incurred by him for the purpose
of bailment.
Section 164: Right to recover compensation from the
bailor : the bailor is responsible to bailee for any loss
which the bailee may sustain by reason that the bailor
was not entitled to make the bailment or to receive back
the goods or to give directions respecting them.
28. Right to Lien
Lien means to retain.
It does not give any right of property or ownership to
bailee.
If the bailee has rendered any service by exercise of
labour or skill in respect of the goods, he gets the right to
retain the goods until he gets the remuneration for the
services rendered.
Lien may be:
Particular Lien
General Lien
29. Particular Lien
It is a lien of bailee in respect of goods bailed for which
he has rendered any service by the exercise of his
labour or skill.
Section 170: Where the bailee has, in accordance with
the purpose of the bailment, rendered any service
involving the exercise of labour or skill in respect of the
goods bailed, he has, in the absence of a contract to the
contrary, a right to retain such goods until he receives
due remuneration for the services he has rendered in
respect of them.
A delivers a rough diamond to B, a jeweller, to be cut and
polished, which is accordingly done. B is entitled to
retain the stone till he is paid for the services he has
rendered.
30. Continued..
Lien by finder of goods S 168
Pawnee S 173-174
Agent S 221
Unpaid seller S 47
Partner S 52 of partnership act
31. General Lien
Under general lien the bailee has a right to retain goods
bailed to him as a security for general balance of
accounts.
Section 171:General lien of bankers, factors,
wharfingers, attorneys and policy-brokers.—Bankers,
factors, wharfingers, attorneys and policy-brokers may, in
the absence of a contract to the contrary, retain as a
security for a general balance of account, any goods
bailed to them; but no other persons have a right to retain,
as a security for such balance, goods bailed to them,
unless there is an express contract to that effect.
32. Section 171
Bankers lien: they can exercise lien over gold
ornaments and fixed deposits. They can retain the
goods for the satisfaction of a debt.
There must be a contract in express terms.
Factors: a factor is an agent who is entrusted with
the possession of the goods of his principal for the
purpose of sale.
Wharfingers: he is a person who keeps a wharf, a
platform in a harbour on which goods are kept for the
purpose of loading or unloading the ships.
Attorneys: they have lien over papers or articles
delivered to them by their clients until their fees are
paid.
33. continued
R.D Sasxena V Balaram Prasad Sharma AIR 2000
SC 2912
SC: looking from the angle of definition under 148
and 171, it cannot be said that case papers entrusted
by the client to his counsel are the goods in his hands
upon which he can claim a lien till his fees or other
charges incurred are not paid. Thus GL is not
available to advocates in respect of the case papers
entrusted by the client to him.
Policy Brokers: he is a person affecting a policy of
marine insurance. He can retain until his charges are
paid.
34. Right to sue Wrongdoer
Section 180: If a third person wrongfully
deprives the bailee of the use of or
possession of the goods bailed, or does them
any injury, the bailee is entitled to such
remedies as the owner might have used as if
there was no bailment; and either the bailor or
bailee may bring a suit against third person
for such deprivation or injury.
36. Contract of Pledge
Section 172: the bailment of goods as security for
payment of a debt or performance of a promise.
Bailor is called Pawnor
Bailee is called as Pawnee
Essentials of Pledge:
1) Delivery of possession of the property pledged.
It may be actual or constructive
37. Continued..
2) the delivery for securing a debt
3) special interest of the pawnee: the pawnee is
entitled to retain the goods pledged for the payment
of the debt, interest and expenses incurred by him for
the preservation of the goods.
4) Pawnee to retain the pledged goods until debt is
fully paid
38. Who can pledge?
Pledge can be made by the owner of the goods.
Exceptions: a person who is not a owner but with the
consent of the true owner, having possession of goods
can make a pledge.
1) Pledge by Mercantile Agent
Section 178: where a mercantile agent is, with the
consent of the owner, in possession of goods or the
documents of titles to the goods, any pledge made by
him, when acting in the ordinary course of business,
shall be valid; provided that the pawnee acts in good
faith and has not, at the time of pledge, notice that the
pawnor has no authority to pledge.
39. Continued..
2(4) Sale of goods act, 1930
“document of title” includes a bill of lading, dock-warrant,
warehouse keeper’s certificate, wharfingers’ certificate, railway
receipt, [multimodal transport document,] warrant or order for the
delivery of goods and any other document used in the ordinary
course of business as proof of the possession or control of goods,
or authorizing or purporting to authorize, either by endorsement or
by delivery, the possessor of the document to transfer or receive
goods thereby represented;
2(9)
“mercantile agent” means a mercantile agent having in the
customary course of business as such agent authority either to sell
goods, or to consign goods for the purposes of sale, or to buy
goods, or to raise money on the security of goods;
40. Essentials of S178
The pledge should be by mercantile agent.
The mercantile agent must have obtained the
possession of goods or documents to title in his
capacity as mercantile agent and with the consent of
the owner.
He must pledge the goods while acting in the
ordinary course of his business.
The pawnee should have acted in good faith
41. 2)Pledge by person in possession under a voidable contract
Section 175-A: when a pawnor has obtained possession of the
goods pledged by him under a voidable contract( 19 & 19A) but the
contract has not been rescinded at the time of the pledge, the
pawnee acquires a good title to the goods, provided he acts in good
faith and without notice of the pawnor’s defect of the title.
Philips V Brooks Ltd.
Facts: a person North, went to the plaintiff’s shop and selected some
jewelry. He falsely represented himself to be Sir George Bullough, a
man of credit and thereby persuaded plaintiff to take payment by
cheque, and hand over the ring immediately. The cheque was
subsequently dishonored. Before the plaintiff could avoid the
contract on the ground of fraud by North, he had pledged the goods
to the defendant. The defendant had taken the ring in good faith.
Held: the pledge was valid.
42. 3)Pledge by a person with a limited interest
Section 179: Where a person pledges goods in which he has
only a limited interest, the pledge is valid to the extent of that
interest.
A pledges the goods to B for Rs 5000 and B makes a sub-
pledge of those goods for Rs. 8000, A gets a right to take back
those goods only by paying Rs. 5000 only.
4) Pledge by seller in possession after sale
Section 30(1) of SGA: Where a person, having sold goods,
continues or is in possession of the goods or of the documents
of title to the goods, the delivery or transfer by that person or
by a mercantile agent acting for him of the goods or
documents of title under any sale, pledge or other disposition
thereof to any person receiving the same in good faith and
without notice of the previous sale shall have the same effect
as if the person making the delivery or transfer were expressly
authorized by the owner of the goods to make the same.
43. Continued..
5) Pledge by buyer in possession after sale: section
30(2):Where a person, having bought or agreed to buy
goods, obtains with the consent of the seller,
possession of the goods or the documents of title to the
goods, the delivery or transfer by that person or by a
mercantile agent acting for him, of the goods or
documents of title under any sale, pledge or other
disposition thereof to any person receiving the same in
good faith and without notice of any lien or other right of
the original seller in respect of the goods shall have
effect as if such lien or right did not exist.
44. Rights of Pawnee
1) Right to retain the goods pledged
2) Right to recover extraordinary
expenses incurred by him.
3) Right to suit to procure the debt
or sale of pledged goods.
45. Right to retain the goods
Section 173: The pawnee may retain the goods
pledged, not only for payment of the debt or the
performance of the promise, but for the interests of the
debt, and all necessary expenses incurred by him in
respect of the possession or for the preservation of the
goods pledged.
Section 174: The pawnee shall not, in the absence of a
contract to that effect, retain the goods pledged for any
debt or promise other than the debt or promise for
which they are pledged; but such contract, in the
absence of anything to the contrary, shall be presumed
in regard to subsequent advances made by the
pawnee.
For subsequent advances made it can be retained.
46. 2) Right to recover extraordinary expenses
Section 175: The pawnee is entitled to receive from the
pawnor extraordinary expenses incurred by him for the
preservation of the goods pledged.
Ex: if he has arranged bank locker for safety of goods etc.
3) Right of suit and sale
Section 176:If the pawnor makes default in payment of
the debt, or performance; at the stipulated time or the
promise, in respect of which the goods were pledged, the
pawnee may bring a suit against the pawnor upon the
debt or promise, and retain the goods pledged as a
collateral security; or he may sell the thing pledged, on
giving the pawnor reasonable notice of the sale.
47. Continued..
The right under S 176 is
disjunctive in nature
The pawnee has a choice
either to retain and sue the
pawnee or sell the goods after
giving a reasonable notice.
48. Right to redeem by Pawnor
Section 177:If a time is stipulated for the payment of
the debt, or performance of the promise, for which
the pledge is made, and the pawnor makes default in
payment of the debt or performance of the promise at
the stipulated time, he may redeem the goods
pledged at any subsequent time before the actual
sale of them, but he must, in that case, pay, in
addition, any expenses which have arisen from his
default.
There cannot be any such agreement which takes
away this right.