this presentation gives the basic idea about the key features about the constitution of The United States of America. it also talks about the Father's of The Constitution Making. it provides basic facts about the US constitution - date it was made, etc.
this presentation gives the basic idea about the key features about the constitution of The United States of America. it also talks about the Father's of The Constitution Making. it provides basic facts about the US constitution - date it was made, etc.
I use a flip chart for the 7 Principles that the kids make and can take notes on. There are diagrams on some of the slides too. Definitions are included on every slide along with examples of each principle.
Page 55 BUSINESS AND THE CONSTITUTIONA federal statute and.docxalfred4lewis58146
Page 55
BUSINESS AND THE CONSTITUTION
A federal statute and related regulations prohibited producers of beer from listing, on a product label, the alcohol content of the beer in the container on which the label appeared. The regulation existed because the U.S. government believed that if alcohol content could be disclosed on labels, certain producers of beer might begin marketing their brand as having a higher alcohol content than competing beers. The government was concerned that “strength wars” among producers could then develop, that consumers would seek out beers with higher alcohol content, and that adverse public health consequences would follow. Because it wished to include alcohol content information on container labels for its beers, Coors Brewing Co. filed suit against the United States government and asked the court to rule that the statute and regulations violated Coors's constitutional right to freedom of speech.
Consider the following questions as you read Chapter 3:
On which provision in the U.S. Constitution was Coors relying in its challenge of the statute and regulations?
Does a corporation such as Coors possess the same constitutional right to freedom of speech possessed by an individual human being, or does the government have greater latitude to restrict the content of a corporation's speech?
The alcohol content disclosures that Coors wished to make with regard to its product would be classified as commercial speech. Does commercial speech receive the same degree of constitutional protection that political or other noncommercial speech receives?
Which party—Coors or the federal government—won the case, and why?
Do producers and other sellers of alcoholic beverages have, in connection with the sale of their products, special ethical obligations that sellers of other products might not have? If so, what are those obligations and why do they exist?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.
2 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.
3 Describe the incorporation doctrine's role in making most guarantees of the Bill of Rights operate to protect persons not only against certain federal government actions but also against certain state and local government actions.
4 Explain the differences among the means-ends tests used by courts when the constitutionality of government action is being determined (strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis).
5 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.
Page 56 6 Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process.
7 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government a.
I use a flip chart for the 7 Principles that the kids make and can take notes on. There are diagrams on some of the slides too. Definitions are included on every slide along with examples of each principle.
Page 55 BUSINESS AND THE CONSTITUTIONA federal statute and.docxalfred4lewis58146
Page 55
BUSINESS AND THE CONSTITUTION
A federal statute and related regulations prohibited producers of beer from listing, on a product label, the alcohol content of the beer in the container on which the label appeared. The regulation existed because the U.S. government believed that if alcohol content could be disclosed on labels, certain producers of beer might begin marketing their brand as having a higher alcohol content than competing beers. The government was concerned that “strength wars” among producers could then develop, that consumers would seek out beers with higher alcohol content, and that adverse public health consequences would follow. Because it wished to include alcohol content information on container labels for its beers, Coors Brewing Co. filed suit against the United States government and asked the court to rule that the statute and regulations violated Coors's constitutional right to freedom of speech.
Consider the following questions as you read Chapter 3:
On which provision in the U.S. Constitution was Coors relying in its challenge of the statute and regulations?
Does a corporation such as Coors possess the same constitutional right to freedom of speech possessed by an individual human being, or does the government have greater latitude to restrict the content of a corporation's speech?
The alcohol content disclosures that Coors wished to make with regard to its product would be classified as commercial speech. Does commercial speech receive the same degree of constitutional protection that political or other noncommercial speech receives?
Which party—Coors or the federal government—won the case, and why?
Do producers and other sellers of alcoholic beverages have, in connection with the sale of their products, special ethical obligations that sellers of other products might not have? If so, what are those obligations and why do they exist?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Describe the role of courts in interpreting constitutions and in determining whether statutes or other government actions are constitutional.
2 Explain the key role of the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause in authorizing action by Congress.
3 Describe the incorporation doctrine's role in making most guarantees of the Bill of Rights operate to protect persons not only against certain federal government actions but also against certain state and local government actions.
4 Explain the differences among the means-ends tests used by courts when the constitutionality of government action is being determined (strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational basis).
5 Describe the differences between noncommercial speech and commercial speech and the respective levels of First Amendment protection they receive.
Page 56 6 Explain the difference between procedural due process and substantive due process.
7 Identify the instances when an Equal Protection Clause–based challenge to government a.
The solution is the constitution not artilce vmiscott57
With a surge of pressure being put on state legislators this year to apply for an Article V convention, here are three reasons to oppose all such constitutional convention applications.
Essay on Creating the Constitution
Essay on US Constitution
The British Constitution Essay example
US Constitution Essay
The U.S. Constitution Essay
Essay about The Constitution
Texas Constitution Essay
Essay about Constitutional Democracy
2. Article II At the time of the writing of the Constitution, the creators (known as framers) weren't quite sure what power to give to the Executive branch. Therefore, they defined very little of its powers; this made it flexible to adapt to the situation at hand. Over the years, Presidents have used this flexibility to assert more powers than those stated in Article II.
3. Article VI, Section 2 Though it may seem rather unimportant, this section played a very important role in the history of federal government. It states that the Constitution, laws, and treaties made by the federal government are the supreme law of the land, and any other laws or mandates are inferior to them. Most notably, this was employed by Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison to justify the power of Judicial Review.
4. Amendment I This amendment is tremendously important, because it guarantees some of the most significant freedoms that Americans hold. Congress is forbidden to make any laws restricting religious practice or Involving any religious establishment. It also cannot limit the freedom of speech or press Nor can it prevent the people from assembling peaceably and submitting complaints to the government. These important rights have allowed the American people to express freely, and has made the United States a world leader in scientific and philosophical thought.
5. Only the first section of this amendment is really important; the rest are fairly minor. Section 1 of the Fourteenth, among other things, formed the basis for what is known as Incorporation. Initially, the Bill of Rights only pertained to the Federal government; the State governments did not have to follow it. The Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment changed all that; it states that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The Supreme Court has interpreted this to mean that the states must also adhere to the Bill of Rights. However, this did not happen instantaneously; each part of each amendment had to be `incorporated' by a separate Supreme Court case. The process began in 1925 with Gitlow v. New York and has taken several decades Amendment XIV