Elected to Congress in 1996, Congressman Roy Blunt has consistently supported policies benefiting the oil industry through his career. He has voted against increasing liability caps for oil spills and supported bills easing offshore drilling restrictions. Blunt has also opposed eliminating tax subsidies for oil companies. Big oil companies like BP and ExxonMobil have been among his top campaign contributors, with Blunt receiving over $1 million from oil and energy interests during his time in Congress.
How federal policies keep us running on empty by preventing access to our gas and oil resources: slowing development, restricting access, and social engineering.
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Marcellus Drilling News
A letter from the attorneys general from 24 of the states opposed to the Obama Clean Power Plan to President-Elect Trump, RINO Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel and RINO House Speaker Paul Ryan. The letter asks Trump to dump the CPP on Day One when he takes office, and asks Congress to adopt legislation to prevent the EPA from such an egregious overreach ever again.
Courtney Hanson Nuclear Economics-20120630MATRRorg
Nuclear Economics presentation by Courney Hanson of Georgia Women's Action for New Directions (Georgia WAND) at the KNOW NUKES Y'ALL SUMMIT on June 30, 2012.
How federal policies keep us running on empty by preventing access to our gas and oil resources: slowing development, restricting access, and social engineering.
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Marcellus Drilling News
A letter from the attorneys general from 24 of the states opposed to the Obama Clean Power Plan to President-Elect Trump, RINO Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel and RINO House Speaker Paul Ryan. The letter asks Trump to dump the CPP on Day One when he takes office, and asks Congress to adopt legislation to prevent the EPA from such an egregious overreach ever again.
Courtney Hanson Nuclear Economics-20120630MATRRorg
Nuclear Economics presentation by Courney Hanson of Georgia Women's Action for New Directions (Georgia WAND) at the KNOW NUKES Y'ALL SUMMIT on June 30, 2012.
Salt deduction limitation is constitutionalFinnKevin
The states of New York, Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey filed a lawsuit alleging that the $10,000 limitation for deducting state and local taxes as itemized deductions violates
the 10th Amendment because it coerces them to abandon their preferred fiscal policies. The District Court held that the state’s claims lacked merit. The 2nd Circuit agreed with the District Court.
Economy Derailed: State-by-State Impacts of the EPA Regulatory Train WreckALEC
Economy Derailed details the most onerous EPA regulations and their specific consequences on state economies. The report highlights the environmental quality improvements made over the past few decades, provides an exhaustive reference list of organizations and groups that oppose the EPA overreach, and makes recommendations on how state legislators can play a role in maintaining state sovereignty over environmental protection.
For more information, please visit www.alec.org.
US Chamber Report: What If...Energy Production was Banned on Federal Lands an...Marcellus Drilling News
This report, the first in the Chamber's Energy Accountability series, finds that if the federal government under Obama and Clinton (as they advocate) were to shut down further energy production from public lands, the result would be catastrophic: the U.S. economy would lose 400,000 jobs and $70 billion in annual GDP.
On 24 May 2011 Rees Warne of Catholic Relief Services gave this presentation in the session, "Initiatives in the International Context: Linkages and Impacts on Africa".
Increasing Friction in Jurisdiction: Interplay Between State Subsidies and th...Stuart Caplan
This presentation from the Infocast Mid-Atlantic (PJM) Market Summit (Oct. 2017) analyzes the jurisdictional and preemption limits of state programs to subsidize chosen power sources as they impact the PJM wholesale power market.
Local Autonomy and Resource Development: Issues and UncertaintiesFernando Penarroyo
Local government units (“LGUs”) outright refusal of consents to resource development within their territorial jurisdiction ranging from declaration of mining moratoriums, ban of particular technologies like open pit mining and submarine tailings disposal, and opposition to energy projects like coal-fired and hydro power plants, wind farms and geothermal exploration have often created controversies with the national government and the resources industry.
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Congress (But Were Afraid to Ask)Alliance To Save Energy
On October 8, Executive VP of Programs and Development Brian Castelli addressed attendants of the Plumbing Manufactures Institute at their 2008 Fall Meeting in Arlington, Va. His presentation Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Congress (But Were Afraid to Ask) gives a straight-forward analysis of the how’s and why’s of policymaking, particularly as they pertain to energy legislation. Castelli also offered a prescient energy policy outlook, and called attention to the interdependence of water and energy consumption.
Salt deduction limitation is constitutionalFinnKevin
The states of New York, Connecticut, Maryland, and New Jersey filed a lawsuit alleging that the $10,000 limitation for deducting state and local taxes as itemized deductions violates
the 10th Amendment because it coerces them to abandon their preferred fiscal policies. The District Court held that the state’s claims lacked merit. The 2nd Circuit agreed with the District Court.
Economy Derailed: State-by-State Impacts of the EPA Regulatory Train WreckALEC
Economy Derailed details the most onerous EPA regulations and their specific consequences on state economies. The report highlights the environmental quality improvements made over the past few decades, provides an exhaustive reference list of organizations and groups that oppose the EPA overreach, and makes recommendations on how state legislators can play a role in maintaining state sovereignty over environmental protection.
For more information, please visit www.alec.org.
US Chamber Report: What If...Energy Production was Banned on Federal Lands an...Marcellus Drilling News
This report, the first in the Chamber's Energy Accountability series, finds that if the federal government under Obama and Clinton (as they advocate) were to shut down further energy production from public lands, the result would be catastrophic: the U.S. economy would lose 400,000 jobs and $70 billion in annual GDP.
On 24 May 2011 Rees Warne of Catholic Relief Services gave this presentation in the session, "Initiatives in the International Context: Linkages and Impacts on Africa".
Increasing Friction in Jurisdiction: Interplay Between State Subsidies and th...Stuart Caplan
This presentation from the Infocast Mid-Atlantic (PJM) Market Summit (Oct. 2017) analyzes the jurisdictional and preemption limits of state programs to subsidize chosen power sources as they impact the PJM wholesale power market.
Local Autonomy and Resource Development: Issues and UncertaintiesFernando Penarroyo
Local government units (“LGUs”) outright refusal of consents to resource development within their territorial jurisdiction ranging from declaration of mining moratoriums, ban of particular technologies like open pit mining and submarine tailings disposal, and opposition to energy projects like coal-fired and hydro power plants, wind farms and geothermal exploration have often created controversies with the national government and the resources industry.
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Congress (But Were Afraid to Ask)Alliance To Save Energy
On October 8, Executive VP of Programs and Development Brian Castelli addressed attendants of the Plumbing Manufactures Institute at their 2008 Fall Meeting in Arlington, Va. His presentation Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Congress (But Were Afraid to Ask) gives a straight-forward analysis of the how’s and why’s of policymaking, particularly as they pertain to energy legislation. Castelli also offered a prescient energy policy outlook, and called attention to the interdependence of water and energy consumption.
Big Business, Big Issues: The Winners and Losers from the U.S. Midterm ElectionsBrunswick Group
The U.S. midterm elections have dealt a new setback to President Obama. As was widely expected, voters have given Republicans control of both chambers of Congress, weakening the president’s already diminished influence in his last two years in office.
But there’s another set of winners and losers in this this election: the sectors, issues and interest groups that have a stake in the outcome.
Brunswick Group’s take on what the 2014 midterm elections mean for your companies, industries and interest groups.
For more information please contact our Washington, DC office: http://www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/washington-dc/
Greenhouse Gas Regulations: Advising Clients in an Uncertain Legal EnvironmentDave Scriven-Young
Presentation to the Chicago Bar Association concerning efforts to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and curb climate change by Congress, the international community, U.S. federal agencies, and the courts.
BAKER DONELSON'S BUSINESS & FINANCIAL INTERESTS IN PRIVATE PRISONSVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
In 2016, while there were many that asked Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome to run for MAYOR and a few that asked why doesn’t she run for the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, Newsome advised that she would NOT be a part of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime and how she was EDUCATED WELL at a Historical Black College/University – FLORIDA A&M University!
We publish this document in SUPPORT of EVIDENCE EXPOSING the United States’ DESPOTISM “Corporate” Government Regime’s WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists and the United States of America’s Legal Counsel (as Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) FINANCIAL INTERESTS/CONTRIBUTIONS and CONNECTIONS – Personal and Business – to the PRIVATE PRISON INDUSTRY!
Information CRITICAL to the ESTABLISHMENT of the PRIMA FACIE Requirements in addressing WHITE-COLLAR Crimes, etc.
The reason why many may have missed such information regarding Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, is because as a WHITE Jewish/Zionist/Supremacist CONTROLLED Law Firm, it has learned to WEAR “TWO FACES” and PLAY BOTH SIDES for purposes of COVERING UP/HIDING its TERRORIST/RACIST Acts from the Public/World as it SO OFTEN “FRAME” Innocent People for their WHITE Jewish/Zionist/Supremacists’ “DOMESTIC” and “INTERNATIONAL/FOREIGN” Terrorist Attacks!
In other words, the Law Firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and its Attorneys/Lawyers MISREPRESENT themselves to the PUBLIC/WORLD as being Advocates for Civil Rights/Human Rights/Equality, etc. WHEN ACTUALLY this Law Firm and its Lawyers/Attorneys are WHITE SUPREMACISTS and SHIELD/HIDE their Terrorist and Racist Agenda AGAINST Blacks/African-Americans/People-Of-Color and Nations-Of-Color from the PUBLIC/WORLD!
SCAMS which INCLUDE representing Prisoners in Legal matters and then CONTRIBUTING and ENGAGING in CRIMINAL Acts that adversely TARGET Blacks/African-Americans/People-Of-Color through their “13th Amendment Scam” and “SCHOOL-TO-PRISON” Scams, etc.
With PEACE and LOVE,
Vogel Denise Newsome – Community Activist
Post Office Box 31265 – Jackson, MS 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
Please feel free to DONATE to SUPPORT The WORK:
USA: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
INTERNATIONAL: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Jobs and Protectionism in the Stimulus Package Preside.docxchristiandean12115
Jobs and Protectionism in the Stimulus
Package
President Obama's spending bill promotes the use of
American goods and labor. Despite foreign and domestic
protests, the language is mainly rhetorical
Members of the Senate and the House hash out differences between the two versions of the
economic stimulus legislation at the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 11 Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
By Moira Herbst
The $787 billion spending legislation being signed on Feb. 17 by President Barack Obama is
designed to jolt some life into a moribund economy. Already, though, provisions to use the
money to "buy American"—whether that means American iron, steel, or labor—is sparking a
debate about whether such rules in a global economy amount to protectionism.
Organized labor and small U.S. manufacturers won an amendment to the stimulus bill to ensure
that more materials used on construction and infrastructure are made in the U.S. Critics of the H-
1B visa program won tougher rules governing when banks that are bailed out by the Troubled
Assets Relief Program (TARP) can fill jobs with skilled immigrants.
The final language drew criticism from abroad, where editorials and government officials
warned it could run afoul of trade agreements. But both provisions are less stringent than earlier
versions had been, and neither is likely to have a radical effect on how stimulus spending takes
shape.
http://www.businessweek.com/bios/Moira_Herbst.htm
Opposition from Exporters
The clearest attempt to wall off foreign companies from U.S. spending came in a "Buy
American" provision. That rule requires that only U.S. iron, steel, and other manufactured goods
be used for public buildings and public works funded under the bill. However, it comes with
several key caveats. For one, the language states that the Buy American policy must not violate
U.S. obligations under existing international trade agreements. Nor does the rule apply if
American goods aren't available in sufficient quantities or if they'll increase the cost of the
overall project by more than 25%. Federal highway, transit, and airport projects are already
covered by similar Buy American requirements.
The battle over the provision had been contentious. On Feb. 3, 100 business groups and
companies—including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, General Electric (GE), Caterpillar
(CAT), and other major construction, defense, and high-tech companies—wrote a letter to Senate
leaders warning that a far-reaching Buy American rule "will harm American workers and
companies across the entire U.S. economy, undermine U.S. global engagement, and result in
mirror-image trade restrictions abroad that would put at risk huge amounts of American exports."
But advocates of the provision—including the Alliance for American Manufacturing, a
partnership of manufacturing companies and the United Steelworkers union—said such rules are
needed to stem the tide of layoffs in th.
An introduction to the cryptocurrency investment platform Binance Savings.Any kyc Account
Learn how to use Binance Savings to expand your bitcoin holdings. Discover how to maximize your earnings on one of the most reliable cryptocurrency exchange platforms, as well as how to earn interest on your cryptocurrency holdings and the various savings choices available.
In the Adani-Hindenburg case, what is SEBI investigating.pptxAdani case
Adani SEBI investigation revealed that the latter had sought information from five foreign jurisdictions concerning the holdings of the firm’s foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) in relation to the alleged violations of the MPS Regulations. Nevertheless, the economic interest of the twelve FPIs based in tax haven jurisdictions still needs to be determined. The Adani Group firms classed these FPIs as public shareholders. According to Hindenburg, FPIs were used to get around regulatory standards.
Implicitly or explicitly all competing businesses employ a strategy to select a mix
of marketing resources. Formulating such competitive strategies fundamentally
involves recognizing relationships between elements of the marketing mix (e.g.,
price and product quality), as well as assessing competitive and market conditions
(i.e., industry structure in the language of economics).
The 10 Most Influential Leaders Guiding Corporate Evolution, 2024.pdfthesiliconleaders
In the recent edition, The 10 Most Influential Leaders Guiding Corporate Evolution, 2024, The Silicon Leaders magazine gladly features Dejan Štancer, President of the Global Chamber of Business Leaders (GCBL), along with other leaders.
At Techbox Square, in Singapore, we're not just creative web designers and developers, we're the driving force behind your brand identity. Contact us today.
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
At Techbox Square, in Singapore, we're not just creative web designers and developers, we're the driving force behind your brand identity. Contact us today.
LA HUG - Video Testimonials with Chynna Morgan - June 2024Lital Barkan
Have you ever heard that user-generated content or video testimonials can take your brand to the next level? We will explore how you can effectively use video testimonials to leverage and boost your sales, content strategy, and increase your CRM data.🤯
We will dig deeper into:
1. How to capture video testimonials that convert from your audience 🎥
2. How to leverage your testimonials to boost your sales 💲
3. How you can capture more CRM data to understand your audience better through video testimonials. 📊
3. 2010: Blunt Protects Limits on Big Oil
Liability Costs
• “There’re going to be liability issues out there that you need to be thoughtful about.
The current liability cap, unless there’s some criminal activity that no one’s aware of, is
going to be the current cap so no matter what you do about that current cap, it’s
there.” [Congressman Blunt at RCGA, 5/18/10]
• “On the spill, Blunt cautioned against overreacting — increasing penalties for
companies that spill oil, he said, will decrease competition and ensure only large
companies access to deep-sea reserves.” [St. Louis Post Dispatch, 5/18/10]
• “Despite several requests for comment, Rep. Roy Blunt hasn't taken a position on the
bill [to increase BP’s liability caps] that we can find…The Blunt campaign’s reluctance
is puzzling, since almost exactly a year ago Blunt criticized Carnahan for not taking
positions on issues.” [Kansas City Star, 5/18/10]
• Blunt flips and sponsors a bill in late May. But the “measure would tie oil companies'
liability to profits—meaning that BP would possibly be forced to pay billions—but
critics charge that such a cap would still protect BP and shield less-profitable firms,
leaving taxpayers to pay the bulk of the costs.” [Wall Street Journal, 6/2/10]
4. 2008: Blunt Co-Sponsored Legislation
Easing Restrictions On Energy Exploration
In The Gulf.
• “But Blunt, who is running for the Senate, is not backing
away from his support for more drilling in the gulf and
Atlantic Ocean. He has co-sponsored a bill easing restrictions
on energy exploration there.” [H.R.6108; Kansas City Star,
05/07/10]
5. 2007: Voted to Protect Tax Benefits for Oil
Companies – 3 Days after Taking $5k from Exxon.
• In August 2007, Blunt voted against a bill to authorize $16.1 billion in energy-
related tax provisions, offset by reducing current tax benefits for oil and gas
companies. The bill extended and expanded tax breaks for renewable energy,
hybrid cars and energy-efficient buildings and appliances. Three days earlier,
on August 1 – Blunt had received a $5,000 from ExxonMobil. [Congressional
Quarterly; HR 2776, Vote 835, 8/4/07; FEC.gov]
• In 2007, Congressman Blunt voted against shifting certain revenue from
royalties and tax incentives from oil and gas companies into a reserve fund for
alternative and renewable energies. The bill would require current offshore
fuel producers who are not paying federal royalties to agree to pay royalties
when fuel prices reach certain thresholds or pay fees based on how much fuel
they produce. The bill passed 264-163. [New York Times, 1/19/07; Speaker
Pelosi Press Release, 1/18/07; CQ Floor Votes, 1/18/07; HR 6, Vote 40,
1/18/07]
6. 2006: Blunt Protected Tax Breaks for Big Oil
Companies from Tax Bill.
• In 2006, Congressman Blunt voted against a motion to instruct conferees
negotiating H.R. 4297, the Tax Reconciliation Bill. The motion would instruct
House conferees to 1) accept three bipartisan provisions from the Senate that
would remove subsidies and close loopholes for large integrated oil
companies, so that big oil companies would pay their fair share of taxes, and
2) strike the extension of the capital gains and dividend tax cuts. The total for
these two proposals was $51 billion. In 2005, the top five oil companies
reaped more than $100 million, three times their profits in 2002. The motion
failed 190-232. [McDermott Talking Points, “Republicans Fight for Big Oil
Subsidies and Loopholes”; HR4297, Vote 109, 4/27/06]
7. 2005: Blunt Supported $2.6 Billion in “Royalty
Relief ” for Companies Drilling in Gulf.
• 2005: Blunt Helped Steer New Benefit for Ultra Deepwater Drilling
Companies like BP: In 2005, Congressman Blunt served on the conference
committee for the 2005 Energy Policy Act. The bill included $14.5 billion in
energy tax breaks, which went overwhelmingly to oil & big energy companies
– including $2.6 billion in the form of “royalty relief ” for oil and gas drilling
in federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico. This provision, which allowed oil
companies to drill on federal lands free of charge – costing taxpayers billions
-- was even opposed by the Bush administration. According to the New
York Times, the “push to lock in the royalty inducements came primarily from
House Republicans.” [New York Times, 3/27/06; HR 6, Vote 445, 7/28/05]
8. 2003: Blunt Supported
$21 Billion for Oil & Gas Industry
– Opposed By John McCain.
• In 2003, Blunt supported a bill “crafted behind closed doors by Republicans”
that included $21.84 billion for the oil & gas industry -- $12.97 billion in
spending and $8.87 billion in tax cuts. Senator John McCain derided the
subsidies and giveaways to big oil in the bill saying, “It will certainly fuel the
coffers of the big oil and gas corporations. It will propel the wealthy special
interests, and it will boost the deficit into the stratosphere.” [HR 6, Vote 630,
11/18/03; Knight Ridder, 11/20/03; Arizona Republic, 11/20/03]
9. 2001: Blunt Supported $12.8 Billion in
“Government Handouts” for Oil Companies.
Under an energy bill Blunt supported in 2001, the oil industry would get tax
breaks worth $12.8 billion, according to the Los Angeles Times. Taxpayers for
Common Sense attacked the bill which the watchdog group said: “would do
nothing to solve America’s energy woes and would dish out more than $38
billion in government handouts to some of the nation’s most profitable
energy companies.” Four days later, on August 6, Blunt received a $1,000
check from ExxonMobil. [Public Interest Research Group, League of
Conservation Voters; HR 4, Vote 320, 8/02/01; Los Angeles Times, 8/3/01;
Taxpayers for Common Sense, 7/31/01]
10. 1999: Blunt Supported $1.2 Billion Dollar
Special Tax Benefit For Oil Companies’
Foreign Operations.
• Blunt voted for the final 1999 GOP Tax package, which included a
provision that would give oil companies a special tax benefit for their
foreign operations. According to USA Today, “One of the biggest
targeted breaks in the newly approved measure is for multinational oil
companies, courtesy of Ways and Means Chairman Bill Archer, R-
Texas. By 2009, the companies would save $ 1.2 billion a year.”
According to the New York Times, the bill contained other measures
beneficial to the oil industry as well, including allowing tax write-offs
for wells that are “marginally productive.”[Vote 333, 7/22/99; Vote
379, 8/5/99; USA Today, 8/17/99; New York Times, 7/21/99]
11. Big Oil and Congressman Blunt
have a mutually beneficial
relationship.
Here are some more facts:
12. Blunt Among Top Ten House
Recipients Of BP Money.
Congressman Blunt is one of the all-time top
10 recipients of money from BP in the House
of Representatives, according to the Center for
Responsive Politics. [Opensecrets.org, 4/30/10;
FEC.gov]
13. Blunt has Taken More Than
$1 Million from Big Oil &
Energy Interests.
Congressman Blunt has taken $1.2 million
from energy industry interests over the
course of his career -- over three-quarters
of a million dollars specifically from oil and
gas interests. [OpenSecrets.org, 5/21/10]
14. This Cycle, Blunt Is #2
Recipient of Oil & Gas Money
in House.
Congressman Blunt has taken more oil &
gas money this cycle than all but one other
member of the House of Representatives.
[OpenSecrets.org]
15. Fancy Fundraisers with Big Oil.
In September of 2009, the political action committees of
ExxonMobil, Marathon Oil, and Devon Energy threw
back-to-back fundraisers for Blunt in Washington, DC.
[Sunlight Foundation]
16. Congressman Blunt has looked
out for Big Oil again and again.
No Bailouts For Big Oil.
It’s that simple.
www.RobinCarnahan.com/NoBigOilBailout