More Related Content
Similar to Conflict-and-Negotiation.ppt
Similar to Conflict-and-Negotiation.ppt (20)
More from ShahzaibChang1 (8)
Conflict-and-Negotiation.ppt
- 1. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S
W W W . P R E N H A L L . C O M / R O B B I N S
T E N T H E D I T I O N
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
- 2. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–2
AFTER STUDYING THIS CHAPTER,
YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO:
1. Define conflict.
2. Differentiate between the traditional, human
relations, and interactionist views of conflict.
3. Contrast task, relationship, and process
conflict.
4. Outline the conflict process.
5. Describe the five conflict-handling intentions.
6. Contrast distributive and integrative
bargaining.
L
E
A
R
N
I
N
G
O
B
J
E
C
T
I
V
E
S
- 3. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–3
AFTER STUDYING THIS CHAPTER,
YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO:
7. Identify the five steps in the negotiating
process.
8. Describe cultural differences in negotiations.
L
E
A
R
N
I
N
G
O
B
J
E
C
T
I
V
E
S
(cont’d)
- 4. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–4
Transitions in Conflict Thought
Causes:
• Poor communication
• Lack of openness
• Failure to respond to
employee needs
- 5. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–5
Transitions in Conflict Thought (cont’d)
- 6. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–6
Functional versus Dysfunctional Conflict
- 8. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–8
The Conflict Process
E X H I B I T 14-1
- 9. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–9
Stage I: Potential Opposition or Incompatibility
Communication
– Semantic difficulties, misunderstandings, and “noise”
Structure
– Size and specialization of jobs
– Jurisdictional clarity/ambiguity
– Member/goal incompatibility
– Leadership styles (close or participative)
– Reward systems (win-lose)
– Dependence/interdependence of groups
Personal Variables
– Differing individual value systems
– Personality types
- 10. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–10
Stage II: Cognition and Personalization
Positive Feelings
Negative Emotions
Conflict Definition
- 11. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–11
Stage III: Intentions
Cooperativeness:
• Attempting to satisfy
the other party’s
concerns.
Assertiveness:
• Attempting to satisfy
one’s own concerns.
- 12. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–12
Stage III: Intentions (cont’d)
- 13. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–13
Stage III: Intentions (cont’d)
- 14. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–14
Dimensions of Conflict-Handling Intentions
E X H I B I T 14-2
- 15. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–15
Stage IV: Behavior
- 16. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–16
Stage IV: Conflict Resolution Techniques
• Problem solving
• Superordinate goals
• Expansion of resources
• Avoidance
• Smoothing
• Compromise
• Authoritative command
• Altering the human variable
• Altering the structural variables
- 17. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–17
Stage IV: Conflict Stimulation Techniques
• Communication
• Bringing in outsiders
• Restructuring the organization
• Appointing a devil’s advocate
- 18. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–18
Conflict-Intensity Continuum
E X H I B I T 14-3
- 19. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–19
Stage V: Outcomes
Functional Outcomes from Conflict
– Increased group performance
– Improved quality of decisions
– Stimulation of creativity and innovation
– Encouragement of interest and curiosity
– Provision of a medium for problem-solving
– Creation of an environment for self-evaluation and
change
Creating Functional Conflict
– Reward dissent and punish conflict avoiders
- 20. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–20
Stage V: Outcomes (cont’d)
Dysfunctional Outcomes from Conflict
– Development of discontent
– Reduced group effectiveness
– Retarded communication
– Reduced group cohesiveness
– Infighting among group members overcomes group
goals
- 22. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–22
Bargaining Strategies
- 23. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–23
Distributive versus Integrative Bargaining
E X H I B I T 14-5
- 24. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–24
Staking Out the Bargaining Zone
E X H I B I T 14-6
- 25. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–25
The
Negotiation
Process
E X H I B I T 14-7
- 26. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–26
Issues in Negotiation
The Role of Personality Traits in Negotiation
– Traits do not appear to have a significantly direct effect
on the outcomes of either bargaining or negotiating
processes.
Gender Differences in Negotiations
– Women negotiate no differently from men, although
men apparently negotiate slightly better outcomes.
– Men and women with similar power bases use the
same negotiating styles.
– Women’s attitudes toward negotiation and their
success as negotiators are less favorable than men’s.
- 27. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–27
Third-Party Negotiations
- 28. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–28
Third-Party Negotiations (cont’d)
- 29. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–29
Why U.S. Managers Might Have Trouble in Cross-
Cultural Negotiations
E X H I B I T 14-8
- 30. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–30
E X H I B I T
Conflict and Unit Performance
14-9a
- 31. © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 14–31
Conflict and Unit Performance (cont’d) E X H I B I T 14-9b