If you face any problem regarding the research then you can communicate with me and I would appreciate your comments.
E-mail: devendrasrivastava36@gmail.com
divyashreenandini@gmail.com
The concept of Marriage under Private International Lawcarolineelias239
Marriage is a broad concept under Private international law. Many new rules had been laid down in various decisions, which had developed the international matrimonial law. The relevancy of monogamous or polygamous marriages. And the validity matters like formal validity and essential validity is also discussed here
If you face any problem regarding the research then you can communicate with me and I would appreciate your comments.
E-mail: devendrasrivastava36@gmail.com
divyashreenandini@gmail.com
The concept of Marriage under Private International Lawcarolineelias239
Marriage is a broad concept under Private international law. Many new rules had been laid down in various decisions, which had developed the international matrimonial law. The relevancy of monogamous or polygamous marriages. And the validity matters like formal validity and essential validity is also discussed here
ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FORMAT
FREE LEGAL AND ACCOUNTANT FORMATS
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
This explains what are parties to a suit, who can be joined as party to suit. It explains joinder, misjoinder, nonjoinder of parties. How parties may be added or struck out.
Classification of cause of action / characterisationcarolineelias239
it is the second element in private international law to decide a case having foreign element, after assuming jurisdiction by a court. It is essential to categorize facts of a case & to find out which part of law to be applied - whether tort / contract/ succession/ marital issues etc. Then only a case can be decided.
A landmark case on the situation of minors in contracts other than necessity, scholarship or insurance. Minor are those below 18 years of age and normally are incompetent to enter into any contracts.
whether the lawyers have a right to strike? Ex-captain Harish Uppal v. Union ...Abhinandan Ray
This is a case on Professional ethics and in this case the court held that lawyers cannot strike arbitrarily inside the court premises but they can wear black badges and can give interview in tv
INTRODUCTON: The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in Chapter XX (sections 493 to 498), provides punishment for offences relating to marriage. These offences may be grouped into four categories:
(i) Mock marriages or deceitful marriages (sections 493, 496);
(ii) Bigamy (sections 494, 495); (iii) Adultery (section 497); and
(iv) Enticing, taking away or detaining a married woman, with criminal intent
(section 498).
FRAUDULENT CONDUCT IN MARRIAGE
Section 493, IPC reads as under:
493. Cohabitation caused by a man deceitfully inducing a belief lawful marriage. Every man who by deceit causes any woman who not lawfully married to him to believe that she is lawfully married to him and to cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him in that belief, shall b punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which ma extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
This section is invoked when a man, either married or unmarried, induces woman to become (as she thinks) his wife, but in reality, she is his concubine. Th offence be committed by a person falsely causing a woman to believe that h may committed by a person foxy causing women to believe that he
is of the same race, creed or religion as herself, and thus inducing her to contract marriage, which in reality is unlawful, but which according to the law under which she lives, is valid. Suppose a person, half English, half Asiatic by blood, calls himself a Mohammedan or Hindu and by this deception, causes a Mohammedan or a Hindu woman to go through the ceremony of marriage, in a form which she deems valid, and to cohabit with him, he has committed this offence.
Live-in Valid Marriage Relationship: Live-in or marriage like relationship is neither a crime nor a sin socially unacceptable in India. The decision to marry in not to marry have a heterosexual relationship is entirely personal. All Live-in-relation are not relationships in the nature of marriage.
Indra Sarma v VKV Sarma
Per KS Radhakrishnan, J Appellant and respondent were working together in a private company.
The respondent, who was working as a Personal Officer of the Company, was a married person having two children and the appellant, aged 33 years, was unmarried Constant contacts between them developed intimacy and in 1992, appellant left the job from the above mentioned Company and started living with the respondent in a shared household Appellant's family members, including her father, brother and sister, and also the wife of the respondent, opposed that live-in-relationship. She has also maintained the stand that the respondent, in fact, started a business in her name and that they were earning from that business. After som
Quashing of criminal proceedings would mean ceasing the legal machinery which had been set in motion. This is usually done after a First Information Report (hereinafter referred to as FIR) is filed, before the charge sheet-filing stage.
US Marketing is an integrated marketing communications company representing national media, promotions, and consulting in important and emerging market segments. Specialties include: youth, young adult, college, Gen X, Y, and Millennial marketing. Multicultural segments include Hispanic, African-American, and Asian
ARBITRATION AGREEMENT FORMAT
FREE LEGAL AND ACCOUNTANT FORMATS
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
This explains what are parties to a suit, who can be joined as party to suit. It explains joinder, misjoinder, nonjoinder of parties. How parties may be added or struck out.
Classification of cause of action / characterisationcarolineelias239
it is the second element in private international law to decide a case having foreign element, after assuming jurisdiction by a court. It is essential to categorize facts of a case & to find out which part of law to be applied - whether tort / contract/ succession/ marital issues etc. Then only a case can be decided.
A landmark case on the situation of minors in contracts other than necessity, scholarship or insurance. Minor are those below 18 years of age and normally are incompetent to enter into any contracts.
whether the lawyers have a right to strike? Ex-captain Harish Uppal v. Union ...Abhinandan Ray
This is a case on Professional ethics and in this case the court held that lawyers cannot strike arbitrarily inside the court premises but they can wear black badges and can give interview in tv
INTRODUCTON: The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in Chapter XX (sections 493 to 498), provides punishment for offences relating to marriage. These offences may be grouped into four categories:
(i) Mock marriages or deceitful marriages (sections 493, 496);
(ii) Bigamy (sections 494, 495); (iii) Adultery (section 497); and
(iv) Enticing, taking away or detaining a married woman, with criminal intent
(section 498).
FRAUDULENT CONDUCT IN MARRIAGE
Section 493, IPC reads as under:
493. Cohabitation caused by a man deceitfully inducing a belief lawful marriage. Every man who by deceit causes any woman who not lawfully married to him to believe that she is lawfully married to him and to cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him in that belief, shall b punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which ma extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
This section is invoked when a man, either married or unmarried, induces woman to become (as she thinks) his wife, but in reality, she is his concubine. Th offence be committed by a person falsely causing a woman to believe that h may committed by a person foxy causing women to believe that he
is of the same race, creed or religion as herself, and thus inducing her to contract marriage, which in reality is unlawful, but which according to the law under which she lives, is valid. Suppose a person, half English, half Asiatic by blood, calls himself a Mohammedan or Hindu and by this deception, causes a Mohammedan or a Hindu woman to go through the ceremony of marriage, in a form which she deems valid, and to cohabit with him, he has committed this offence.
Live-in Valid Marriage Relationship: Live-in or marriage like relationship is neither a crime nor a sin socially unacceptable in India. The decision to marry in not to marry have a heterosexual relationship is entirely personal. All Live-in-relation are not relationships in the nature of marriage.
Indra Sarma v VKV Sarma
Per KS Radhakrishnan, J Appellant and respondent were working together in a private company.
The respondent, who was working as a Personal Officer of the Company, was a married person having two children and the appellant, aged 33 years, was unmarried Constant contacts between them developed intimacy and in 1992, appellant left the job from the above mentioned Company and started living with the respondent in a shared household Appellant's family members, including her father, brother and sister, and also the wife of the respondent, opposed that live-in-relationship. She has also maintained the stand that the respondent, in fact, started a business in her name and that they were earning from that business. After som
Quashing of criminal proceedings would mean ceasing the legal machinery which had been set in motion. This is usually done after a First Information Report (hereinafter referred to as FIR) is filed, before the charge sheet-filing stage.
US Marketing is an integrated marketing communications company representing national media, promotions, and consulting in important and emerging market segments. Specialties include: youth, young adult, college, Gen X, Y, and Millennial marketing. Multicultural segments include Hispanic, African-American, and Asian
Unreinforced masonry structures, buildings are highly vulnerable they often cannot withstand the dynamic horizontal loads in case of earthquakes
Soil structures, such as embankments, are subjected to landslides during earthquakes
Hence the necessity to develop efficient methods for the retrofitting of existing buildings and earthworks and of related monitoring systems to possibly prevent the structural damage
For this purpose multifunctional textile structures are being developed for application in construction for the retrofitting of structures and earthworks
The Purposeful Leadership Framework provides a broad approach to Leadership and Leadership Development. By classifying important elements in the Leadership Process, it shows how leadership is related to strategy, people management and social influence skills, business and technical knowledge. It provides an overivew of concepts that clarify the real work of leaders by highlighting the importance of the Context for Leadership, the Organizational and Stakeholder Levers Used for Leading, and the Types of Activities used by Leaders. See also Purposeful Leadership Development at http://www.slideshare.net/FJPapotto/designing-leadership-development
Petition before Hon'ble President of India dated 11.05.2016Om Prakash Poddar
Petition before Hon'ble President of India prior to Writ Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 before Supreme Court of India against Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai Bihar
Complaint dated 14.12.22 against Advocates to NHRC.pdfOmPrakashPoddar1
Criminal Complaint against Advocates Gopal Kumar, Sunil K. Ojha, Anil Kumar Bharti, Satya Prakash and Jai Bansal for concealing the material facts, suppressing the rescue and sustaining the Gang Rapes, illicit sex trade and human trafficking of kidnapped victim families since 2011
President of India forwarded to Registrar General Patna High Court dated 08....Om Prakash Poddar
President of India forwarded Complaint vide PRSEC/E/2016/06805 dated 10.05.2016 to Registrar General Patna High Court on 08.06.2016 prior to Writ Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 before Supreme Court of India
Nexus of rtd justice s.b. sinha and praveen kumar idas to cgdaOm Prakash Poddar
Nexus of Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha & Praveen Kumar (IDAS) to kill me and my oxygen dependent mother in the defense area of Palam New Delhi and to usurp our property in Bihar has been apprised to Controller General Defense Accounts, Government of India to take departmental action against Praveen Kumar (IDAS)
Interlocutory Application dated 9.10.22 for Cancellation of NBW before SC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Recall the order dated 25.08.2010 and 08.09.2011, whereby Non-Bailaible Warrants were issued against the petitioner Om Prakash and his mother Asha Rani Devi by Begusarai Court under the judicature of Patna High Court in 9-P/2010 and 397c/2011 (Criminal Case Complaint (P) no. 5591/2013) case and Cancel the Non-Bailaible Warrants issued against the Petitioner and his mother to eradicate Prostitution and International Sex Racket.
Application (I.A.No.164340) for Non Bailable Warrant dated 01.11.2022 SC.pdfOmPrakashPoddar1
Non Bailable Warrant issued kept secret and maintained since 2010 to confiscate my Property, to push my families into prostitution and to kill my parents including me.
This include some important formats applicable in Indian courts and is very essential for Law Students.
These formats may even be translated to the local (scheduled) indian languages and may be used in the respective courts.
RTI dated 7.12.22 against suppression of Gang Rape matter.pdfOmPrakashPoddar1
Supreme Court of India is main accused in Non Bail able Warrant and Gang Rape matter W.P.(Crl.) D.NO. 18546/2022. Sixteen petitions (SLP. Writ, Review, Curative and M.A) have been filed against interlinked with this matter since 2012 to till date, yet no rescue of 18 year ago kidnapped pregnant wife Rina Kumari (Guddi) and abducted unseen minor daughter from the clutches of sex Abusers State by Supreme Court of India and Union of India as on date
Written Arguments for Anti Prostitution Matter on 31.10.2022 before Supreme C...Om Prakash Poddar
Present writ petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution, has been filed by the victim father of unseen minor daughter, viz., Shri Om Prakash for the issuance of appropriate writs or direction(s) of like nature against the respondents herein for the protection of his minor daughter who has been kidnapped on 15.04.2005 while she was inside the womb of her mother Reena Kumari (Guddi) age about 40 years from the rented house of Judge’s driver Mr. Pappu Yadav and Mr. Brajesh Yadav R/O Gali No. 12, Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony, Palam Village Police Station, New Delhi-110077.
The grievance in the said writ petition is that after kidnapping his pregnant wife, on the one hand Petitioner is being pulled in the abuse of court process at Dwarka Court, Patiala House Court, Delhi High Court, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi and Begusarai Court, Patna High Court at Bihar and on the other hand sexual abuse of his families continued secretly by the State. For the first, Petitioner has caught his families into the mud of prostitution and illicit sex trade on 05.04.2021 at Shastri Park North East Delhi, which has resulted in W.P.(Criminal) No. 242/2021 before this Hon’ble Court. After identification of illicit sex trade of his families, Petitioner has submitted several written reports since then to till date every day before the officer in-charge of the police station concerned along with the concerned higher Police authorities of NCT of Delhi and State of Bihar who did not take any action on the same and did not register an FIR to recover the minor daughter. Moreover, steps were not taken either for apprehending the accused or for the recovery of the minor girl child.
Written Arguments dated 17.10.2022 in Anti Prostitution Matter before SC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Writ petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution, has been filed by the victim father of unseen minor daughter, viz., Shri Om Prakash for the issuance of appropriate writs or direction(s) of like nature against the respondents herein for the protection of his minor daughter who has been kidnapped on 15.04.2005 while she was inside the womb of her mother Reena Kumari (Guddi) age about 40 years from the rented house of Judge’s driver Mr. Pappu Yadav and Mr. Brajesh Yadav R/O Gali No. 12, Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony, Palam Village Police Station, New Delhi-110077. The grievance in the said writ petition is that after kidnapping his pregnant wife, on the one hand Petitioner is being pulled in the abuse of court process at Dwarka Court, Patiala House Court, Delhi High Court, Supreme Court of India at New Delhi and Begusarai Court, Patna High Court at Bihar and on the other hand sexual abuse of his families continued secretly by the State. For the first time, Petitioner has caught his families into the mud of prostitution and illicit sex trade on 05.04.2021 at Shastri Park North East Delhi, 11.05.2022 under the jurisdiction of Kadwa Police Station Katihar Bihar, 19.06.2022 under the jurisdiction of Lahori Gate Police Station Delhi-6; which has resulted in W.P.(Criminal) No. 242/2021 and W.P.(Criminal) D. No. 18546/2022 before this Hon’ble Court. After identification of illicit sex trade of his families, Petitioner has submitted several written reports since then to till date every day before the officer in-charge of the police station concerned along with the concerned higher Police authorities of NCT of Delhi and State of Bihar who did not take any action on the same and did not register an FIR to recover the minor daughter. Moreover, steps were not taken either for apprehending the accused or for the recovery of the minor girl child.
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016Om Prakash Poddar
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
Letter dated 9.11.2022 complaint against sahender kumar to CJI SC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Complaint against Shri Shri Sahender Kumar Petitioner –in-Person filing counter employee at Supreme Court of India for tempering records of the Anti-Prostitution matter W.P.Criminal diary no. 18546/2022
Reply to Election Commission Delhi in NGS5322435639 dated 25.11.2022.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ERO Ms. Sunita Raj mobile no. 9650058340 59-Vishwas Nagar Constituency Sahadra district at East Delhi has admitted this fact that she has sent her man for making a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant on 24.11.2022 at Shelter Home DUSIB Code No.214 near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi. Hence, your BLO will disclose the name and address of person for whom he wanted to make fake Voter ID with ulterior motives.
112 call has been made against your fraud BLO dated 24.11.2022 with unique reference no. 6161038, PCR Petrol Vehicle ROMO9A mobile no. 7428002509 at 19.32.34pm. Anand Vihar policeman mobile number is 8595888677. Police had taken him to the police station. Hence police has recorded his name and address and motives behind it.
Inquiry officer Balveer Singh mobile no. 9654963400 of Patpatganj Industrial Area Police Station near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi will provide you the name and address of person who had come to make a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant.
Your fraud BLO did not disclose his identity before complainant.
Complaint dated 27.11.2022 to Commissioner of Polic Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
TAKE the cognizance of obvious links between Ms. Sunita Raj, BLO Anand Vihar and Mr. Manish Raj with this International Sex Racket and direct to concern SHO to register an F.I.R against the accused under relevant sections of IPC.
112 call dated 24.11.2022 at 19.32.34pm with unique reference no. 6161038 and subsequent Complaint dated 25.11.2022 to the Commissioner of Police Delhi dated 25.11.2022 discloses links with Mr. Manish Raj son of Chief Minister of Jharkhand in this International Sex Racket
Suppression of crucial records in Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in W.P. (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 listed for hearing on 28.11.2022 before Chamber Judge HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, Court No.15 CL.NO.1748 may lead to dismissal of petition.
Registry has only recorded the records to defend its heinous work in the Office Report dated 26.11.2022 hiding all the factual crucial records filed by the petitioner even after his reminder though e-filed letter dated 22.11.2022 addressed to Branch Officer and Assistant Registrar Section X
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Registry has recorded records in his favor only and has ignored the crucial records of petitioner deliberately to dismiss the petition by default.
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 for the hearing of Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18646/2022 on 28.11.2022 has been made hiding the crucial records filed by the petitioner.
Office Report dated 28.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Office Report has been made hiding crucial records of petitioner. Registry has recorded his own record only and has deliberately ignored the record of petitioner to dismiss the petition by default.
Complaint dated 26.11.22 against Election Officer Katihar Bihar.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
a fake voter identity card has been created by BLO Part-220, Ward No.03, 64-Kadwa Constituency Katihar Bihar vide EPIC No. TYGO395244 against the Complainant. Complainant has figured out malpractices of BLO and submitted requisite form before BLO Gopal Malik mobile no. 9507949474 dated 17.12.2021 for deletion of his name from the voter list to suppress the practice of multiple voter identity cards across the Country.
Complaint dated 25.11.22 against Election Officer Sahadra Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Sex abuser Manish from Election Commission Delhi took my Aadhar Card by fraud to make Voter ID for my kidnapped minor daughter marking me as a legal guardian under Vishwas Nagar Constituency at Sahadra district of East Delhi.
Praying from you to direct the registry to supply the fixed date of hearing to the petitioner in person in writing in Non Bailable and Gang Rape matter W.P. Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 so that he can plan his travel for home
Letter dated 22.11.2022 to Branch Officer Section 10 at Supreme Court of Ind...Om Prakash Poddar
Take all 84 e-filed legal documents with effect from 07.06.2022 to 22.11.2022 along with physical filed legal document with effect from 14.06.2022 to till date on Record of office report for the date of hearing on 25.11.2022
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed deliberately by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with an ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
E-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Supreme Court ...Om Prakash Poddar
All Annexes, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Petitioner has e-filed 10 legal documents on 7.6.2022 and 84 Additional legal documents till 22.11.2022 in Provisional Application no. 12939-2022 and Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 before Supreme Court of India which has not been taken into record of office report dated 24.09.2022 and has not been entered into Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 at the website in the public domain. Hence, crucial records have been suppressed deliberately with ulterior motive.
Complaint dated 21.11.2022 against Bihar and Delhi police to NHRC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
#Internationalsexracket
National Human Rights Commission New Delhi, take action against kidnapping, abduction and Gang Rape of my families and minor daughters.
E-filed status dated 15.11.22 before Supreme Court of India.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
E-filed Important legal documents like Interlocutory Applications for additional grounds and cancellation of Non Bailable Warrant has not been entered into Physical filing case record Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 to present the wrong fact before the Chamber Judge on 25.11.2022
Complaint aginst Delhi Police to NHRC New Delhi dated 20.11.22.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police case.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters. Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Writ Petition Criminal Diary Number 18546 of 2022 Part-I .pdfOm Prakash Poddar
International Sex Racket and Anti-Prostitution Petition before Supreme Court of India.
These five are key people and will reveal all records in this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court New Delhi.
Writ Petition Criminal Diary Number 18546 of 2022 Part-I .pdf
Complaint against Advocates to Bar Council of Bihar
1. Date: 02.05.2016
To,
The Bihar State Bar Council
SUB: COMPLAINT AGAINST ADVOCATE GOPAL KUMAR
(836/1991), DISTRICT COURT BEGUSARAI AND
ADVOCATE DHIRENDRA PRASAD (963/1990), DISTRICT
COURT, KATIHAR BIHAR-reg.
Hon’ble Sir,
1.Hon’ble sir, the undersigned is petitioner,
named Om Prakash S/O Late Sh Deep Narayan
Poddar R/O Asha Deep Niwas, Shukkar Hat, Durga
Mandir, Sonaili, Kadwa, Katihar, Bihar-855114
and rented R/O RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg,
Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony, New Delhi-
110077
2.Hon’ble sir, Advocate, Gopal Kumar, district
court, Begusarai managed to get issued a
frivolous N.B.W dated 25.08.2010 against me and
my ailing old age mother through SP Begusarai
while I was struggling to save the life of my
mother in ICU of AIIMS, New Delhi. His wife
2. Protection officer (Under protection of women
against domestic violence Act 2005) has misused
and abused her vested power by way of
instituting frivolous litigation vide case No.
9P/2010 dated 31.03.2010 before CJM Court
Begusarai, Bihar after a gap of 5 years for her
own vested interest. Replication and
cancellation of N.B.W have been filed by me on
03.03.2011 against this frivolous case at
Begusarai Court in Bihar. It is also on the
Supreme Court Record with SLP(C) no. 9854/2012,
SLP(C) no. 9483/2013 and SLP(C) no. 19073/2013.
3.Hon’ble sir, the client of Advocate Gopal Kumar
has appeared before the Trial Court at New
Delhi but did not file written statement (WS)
before Trial Court at New Delhi and did not
join High Court of Delhi even after receipt of
service Notice which is also on the Supreme
Court Record.
4.Hon’ble sir, after the pronouncement of Ex-
parte Judgment by the High Court of Delhi in
favour of me in MAT. APPL. 7/2012 on
23.07.2013; second time Advocate Gopal Kumar
has instituted another frivolous criminal case
vide case no. 5591/2013 u/s 498A/323 of IPC and
3. u/s 3/4 of D.P. Act with filing date 07.02.2011
and first hearing date 05.12.2013 without the
knowledge of me. It is pertinent to note here
that the client of Advocate Gopal Kumar has
appeared before the Trial Court at New Delhi on
09.02.2011 in case No. HMA-700/2010 before
Principal Judge, Family Court, Dwarka Court at
New Delhi and intentionally did not mention
criminal case no. 5591/2013 filing date
7.2.2011 u/s 498A/323 of IPC and u/s 3/4 of D.P
Act to the Trial Court.
5.Hon’ble sir, the marriage was fraudulent with
misrepresentation of bride in 2004. I have
never ever been to the residence of rich IOCL
client of Advocate Gopal Kumar in my whole
life. I even do not know the multiple
residential addresses of rich IOCL client of
Advocate Gopal Kumar since 12 years. For the
first time I came to know the official address
of rich IOCL client of Advocate Gopal Kumar on
09.02.2011 when she supplied the proceedings of
Begusarai Court against case no. 9P/2010 before
the Trial Court at New Delhi.
4. 6.Hon’ble sir, No FIR, No WS by the client of
Advocate Gopal Kumar before the Trial Court at
New Delhi, No appearance by the client of
Advocate Gopal Kumar before the High Court of
Delhi, yet frivolous criminal cases are
continuing for the same cause of action after
the settlement by the High Court of Delhi on
23.07.2013 in MAT. APPL. 7/2012.
7.Hon’ble sir, after winning the case MAT. APPL.
7/2012 in 2013, I have visited thrice to my
parental house in Bihar and have not received
any Notice or Summon against u/s 498A/323 of
IPC and u/s 3/4 of D.P. Act as on date.
8.Hon’ble sir, it is a backstabbing plans to
create and repeat another Kanahiya case (of
17th
February, 2016 inside the Patiala House
Court premises at New Delhi) in the premises of
Begusarai Court against me and my mother.
9.Hon’ble sir, it also violates the directions of
Hon’ble Supreme Court which has been laid down
in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar
in Cr APP No. 1277 of 2014.
5. 10. Hon’ble sir, three untimely deaths have
been occurred in my family since 12 years. My
family has been reduced to one member family
i.e. ailing old age mother only now and the
criminal conspiracy through misusing Government
machineries are increasing day by day against
me and my mother.
11. Hon’ble sir, if these misused Government
machineries who are indulged in criminal
conspiracies since 12 years against me and my
mother are not being stopped and not being
punished then I and my mother will also
disappear untimely like an untimely demise of
my father in 2007 and my property will be
usurped by the client of the Advocate Gopal
Kumar and no one will be left in my family to
report.
12. Hon’ble sir, it has been observed over the
period of 12 years that these misused
Government machineries are from the same
community i.e. Kayasth community of Bihar viz.
S.B. Sinha, Retd. Chief Justice of Delhi High
Court; Praveen Kumar, C&MD, IDPL; Veena Kumari,
6. Protection officer Begusarai; her husband,
Gopal Kumar, Advocate district court,
Begusarai; Yugal Kishore Sinha, DSP, Katihar;
Nawal Kishore Sinha, Accountant, SBI, ADB
Sonaili Bazar, Katihar; Dhirendra Prasad,
Advocate, district court, Katihar and Hari
Prasad, Assistant Commissioner, Food supplies &
consumer affairs, Dwarka, New Delhi.
13. Hon’ble sir, these misused Government
machineries have turned my parental house into
public toilet with the help of SP Katihar and
local Mukhiya, Mr. Bihari Lal Bubna in the
midst of religious gathering called Bhagwat
w.e.f 28.02.2016 to 05.03.2016. Fax complaint
and electronic complaints have been forwarded
to all concern government agencies against the
same on 03.03.2016. Complaint also has been
forwarded to Chief Minister Secretariat (CMSEC)
through Bihar Public Grievance Redressal System
vide complaint number 99999-0303160113 and
99999- 1703160139 dated 03.03.2016 and
29.03.2016. No action has been taken so far.
14. Hon’ble sir, Advocate Dhirendra Prasad,
District Court, Katihar, has given a threat to
7. the life of the petitioner and his pensioned
mother to render apology or to face criminal
case u/s 500 of IPC against the Notice u/s 80
CPC to SBI accountant and Bank manager sonaili,
Katihar. Notice u/s 80 CPC to SBI Sonaili
Katihar has been sent for attacking the pension
account of customer, harassing the customer
unnecessarily, not removing KYC alert, refusing
to open ATM machine for withdrawal, planning to
hack the ATM pin of customer, tracking the
customer till Delhi with ulterior motive and
establishing nexus with Dwarka SBI Branch to
hack the ATM pin of customer. Revenue of
property of the petitioner’s mother has been
attacked by the Branch Manager SBI Sonaili in
the garb of Green Remit Card (GRC), while GRC
is not mandatory and it is not applicable for
home branch. Home Branch Manager, SBI Sonaili
did not let the attendant of petitioner’s
mother to deposit her own cash from property
into her own saving account.
15. Hon’ble sir, these misused Government
machineries are not letting me to live in Bihar
as well as in Delhi infringing my right to life
or personal liberty under Article 21.
8. 16. Hon’ble sir, my Writ (C) 90 of 2016 has
been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India as the Hon’ble court did not find any
ground under Article 32 of Constitution of
India to entertain this petition.
17. Hon’ble Sir, Whether I have right to live
or not?
18. Hon’ble sir, on the basis of above facts
and circumstances, it is accordingly prayed
that an appropriate action to be initiated
against Advocate Gopal Kumar District court
Begusarai and Advocate Dhirendra Prasad,
District Court, Katihar Bihar against the
pursuance of frivolous criminal litigation
against the petitioner and his ailing old age
mother which has been settled by the High Court
of Delhi on 23.07.2013 in MAT. APPL. 7/2012, in
the furtherance of Justice.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
NEW DELHI:
FILED ON : 02.05.2016