This document discusses community networks and who should benefit from investments in network infrastructure like fiber optic cables. It notes that copper telephone wires will be replaced by fiber optics with much higher capacity. It asks whether cities and citizens or absent owners like phone companies should benefit. It then introduces the Open Public Local Access Network (OPLAN) model where infrastructure is controlled independently and provides abundant connectivity for local communities at low cost, preserving value for users. The CONFINE project aims to experimentally test this community network approach.
1. Community Networks
… neutrality or hostage?
Malcolm Matson
email: malcolm.matson@oplan.org
www.oplan.org
http://confine‐project.eu
2. FACT
In the coming decades, the innately scarce capacity of the
1,500,000,000 copper telephone wires in the world which
connect our phones and computers to the local telephone
exchange and via that, to the ‘public internet’, will be replaced
by optical fibre with its innately abundant capacity.
QUESTION
Who should reap the primary value and benefit from this
investment in a major technology upgrade?
OUR CITIES & CITIZENS? ABSENT OWNERS?
• YOU? • PHONE COMPANIES?
• ME? • PRIVATE EQUITY FIRMS?
• OUR CHILDREN? • BANKS?
• OUR GRANDCHILDREN? • INVESTMENT FUNDS?
• LOCAL BUSINESSES AND ORGANISATIONS? • GOVERNMENTS – LOCAL AND NATIONAL
3. FACT Sascha Meinrath “When Malcolm Matson asks the question,
Director, Open Technology Initiative
In the coming decades, the innately scarce capacity of the ‘Who will control
1,500,000,000America Foundation istelephone wires local connectivity?’
The New
copper a non-profit, non- in the world which
connect our public new ideas toand computers he exposes the fundamental question
partisan
phones that invests in next
thinkers and
policy institute
address the
new
to the local telephone
exchange generation of challenges facing toUnited States
and via that, the the ‘public internet’, will be replaced
facing civil society at the dawn
by optical fibre with its innately abundant capacity. st century”of the 21
QUESTION
Who should reap the primary value and benefit from this
investment in a major technology upgrade?
OUR CITIES & CITIZENS? ABSENT OWNERS?
• YOU? • PHONE COMPANIES?
• ME? • PRIVATE EQUITY FIRMS?
• OUR CHILDREN? • BANKS?
• OUR GRANDCHILDREN? • INVESTMENT FUNDS?
• LOCAL BUSINESSES AND ORGANISATIONS? • GOVERNMENTS – LOCAL AND NATIONAL
4. CONCLUSION
Public policy in almost every country in the world and
certainly in the European Union, and every ‘next generation
broadband’ initiative we are aware of, (past, present and
future) is guaranteed to deliver the very opposite.
OUR CITIES & CITIZENS? ABSENT OWNERS?
• YOU? • PHONE COMPANIES?
• ME? • PRIVATE EQUITY FIRMS?
• OUR CHILDREN? • BANKS?
• OUR GRANDCHILDREN? • INVESTMENT FUNDS?
• LOCAL BUSINESSES AND ORGANISATIONS? • GOVERNMENTS – LOCAL AND NATIONAL
6. EU's Seventh Framework Programme for Research (FP7)
ICT‐2011 Future Internet Research & Experimentation (FIRE)
Large Scale Integrating Project
construction and operation of a new “experimental testbed” for research in
community networking
‘mesh networking’ based on distributed, open source control
GOALS
experimentally, rather than theoretically driven research into community networking
evaluation of the community network model for the ‘future internet’
free and open dissemination
socio/technical/economic/legal evaluation of the testbed outputs and model
sustainability (technical and financial)
7. Community Networks Testbed
for the Future Internet
http://confine-project.eu/
Universitat Politècnia de Catalunya (co‐ordinator) ‐ Spain
Fundació Privada per a la Xarxa Oberta, Lliure I Neutral guifi.net ‐ Spain
FunkFeuer ‐ Austria
Athens Wireless Network ‐ Greece
The OPLAN Foundation – United Kingdom
Comunicació per a la Cooperació – Pangea ‐ Spain
Fraunhofer‐Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.v. ‐ Germany
Interdisciplinary Institute for Broadband Technology ‐ Belgium
8. ‘real‐world’ rather than laboratory conditions (based on existing community networks)
serious academic and scientific involvement
a test‐bed at both the physical and application levels
the under‐pinning driver is ‘openness’
open source hardware/software
test‐bed network and the CONFINE project is ‘open’ for others to become involved and collaborate
‘opening minds to open networks’
FOUR YEAR PROJECT
● Year 1: Initial set-up
● Year 2: open call round 1
● Year 3: open call round 2
● Year 4: refinements, stabilization of operation and dissemination
9. Community Networks
… neutrality or hostage?
Malcolm Matson
email: malcolm.matson@oplan.org
www.oplan.org
http://confine‐project.eu