This summary provides an overview of the financial information and program services of Man in the Mirror, Inc. for the 2017 tax year:
1) Man in the Mirror's expenses totaled $2,858,853 including $732,002 in grants. Revenue was $2,246,446.
2) The organization's largest program service was its Leadership Community program which provided churches resources to disciple men and had expenses of $116,854.
3) The second largest program was its Resource Ministry which distributed books and had expenses of $188,635 and revenue of $53,242.
This document is the Form 990 for Central Asia Institute for 2010. It summarizes the organization's mission as empowering communities in Central Asia through education, especially for girls, and promoting peace through education. It provides details on the organization's largest program services which include school building and support, teacher and student support, and global outreach programs to promote education in Central Asia.
The document is an IRS Form 990 for Meals on Wheels Association of America for the 2011 tax year. It summarizes the organization's mission, programs, and finances. The organization's mission is to provide national leadership to end senior hunger. Its largest program services by expense were helping train and promote proper nutrition to local agencies, obtaining government grants for community nutrition services, and hosting an annual conference to promote information exchange. Total program service expenses were over $4.2 million.
The document is a letter from Guillermo Soria of Soria Inc. to NOWCastSA regarding their 2013 Form 990 tax return. It states that Soria Inc. has electronically filed NOWCastSA's 2013 Form 990 return for the tax year ending December 31, 2013. It thanks NOWCastSA for the opportunity to serve them and offers to answer any questions about the return. There is no fee charged for the tax preparation services.
The document is a letter from Guillermo Soria of Soria Inc. to NOWCastSA regarding their 2014 Form 990 tax return. It states that Soria Inc. has electronically filed NOWCastSA's 2014 Form 990 return for the tax year ending December 31, 2014. It thanks NOWCastSA for the opportunity to serve them and offers to answer any questions about the return. It is accompanied by documentation of the services rendered and a $0 fee.
The queen of child / baby trafficking strikes gold again. 5 year snap shot Ms. Sizemore's baby selling business nets $2.2 million bet that is more than Bennet Kelley made the last 15 years, squandered away in his tri-level rodent infested shack.
Robin has been in the news quite a bit lately
Although its not her self-news idolizing herself as some sort of child savior and "family builder"
http://www.armenianadoptionadventrue.blogspot.com
The document is a letter from Guillermo Soria of Soria Inc. to NOWCastSA regarding preparation of NOWCastSA's 2012 Form 990 tax return. The letter states that Soria Inc. has electronically filed NOWCastSA's 2012 Form 990 tax return and appreciates the opportunity to serve NOWCastSA. If NOWCastSA has any questions about the return, it should contact Soria Inc. No fees were charged for preparation of the return.
The document is an IRS Form 990 for the organization Friends of African Village Libraries. Some key details:
- The organization's mission is to establish and support rural village libraries and promote reading programs in African countries.
- In 2022, the organization had gross receipts of $80,004 and total expenses of $73,617.
- The organization's three largest program services were supporting community libraries in northern Ghana, Burkina Faso, and Uganda with books, librarian salaries, training, operating expenses, and programs.
NOWCASTSA is a San Antonio-based online news organization that educates and informs local residents. It had $85,285 in gross receipts in 2018 and employed 5 individuals. Its mission is to operate as an online news source and promote civic conversation in San Antonio.
This document is the Form 990 for Central Asia Institute for 2010. It summarizes the organization's mission as empowering communities in Central Asia through education, especially for girls, and promoting peace through education. It provides details on the organization's largest program services which include school building and support, teacher and student support, and global outreach programs to promote education in Central Asia.
The document is an IRS Form 990 for Meals on Wheels Association of America for the 2011 tax year. It summarizes the organization's mission, programs, and finances. The organization's mission is to provide national leadership to end senior hunger. Its largest program services by expense were helping train and promote proper nutrition to local agencies, obtaining government grants for community nutrition services, and hosting an annual conference to promote information exchange. Total program service expenses were over $4.2 million.
The document is a letter from Guillermo Soria of Soria Inc. to NOWCastSA regarding their 2013 Form 990 tax return. It states that Soria Inc. has electronically filed NOWCastSA's 2013 Form 990 return for the tax year ending December 31, 2013. It thanks NOWCastSA for the opportunity to serve them and offers to answer any questions about the return. There is no fee charged for the tax preparation services.
The document is a letter from Guillermo Soria of Soria Inc. to NOWCastSA regarding their 2014 Form 990 tax return. It states that Soria Inc. has electronically filed NOWCastSA's 2014 Form 990 return for the tax year ending December 31, 2014. It thanks NOWCastSA for the opportunity to serve them and offers to answer any questions about the return. It is accompanied by documentation of the services rendered and a $0 fee.
The queen of child / baby trafficking strikes gold again. 5 year snap shot Ms. Sizemore's baby selling business nets $2.2 million bet that is more than Bennet Kelley made the last 15 years, squandered away in his tri-level rodent infested shack.
Robin has been in the news quite a bit lately
Although its not her self-news idolizing herself as some sort of child savior and "family builder"
http://www.armenianadoptionadventrue.blogspot.com
The document is a letter from Guillermo Soria of Soria Inc. to NOWCastSA regarding preparation of NOWCastSA's 2012 Form 990 tax return. The letter states that Soria Inc. has electronically filed NOWCastSA's 2012 Form 990 tax return and appreciates the opportunity to serve NOWCastSA. If NOWCastSA has any questions about the return, it should contact Soria Inc. No fees were charged for preparation of the return.
The document is an IRS Form 990 for the organization Friends of African Village Libraries. Some key details:
- The organization's mission is to establish and support rural village libraries and promote reading programs in African countries.
- In 2022, the organization had gross receipts of $80,004 and total expenses of $73,617.
- The organization's three largest program services were supporting community libraries in northern Ghana, Burkina Faso, and Uganda with books, librarian salaries, training, operating expenses, and programs.
NOWCASTSA is a San Antonio-based online news organization that educates and informs local residents. It had $85,285 in gross receipts in 2018 and employed 5 individuals. Its mission is to operate as an online news source and promote civic conversation in San Antonio.
AILA needs absolute finance transparency. Bryan Johnson
How is staff compensation (a cool 6 million) GREATER than revenue from membership dues (5 million)? Without a full account of every penny spent, I'm suspicious.
1. The organization's mission is to train and certify members in conducting marine inspections and audits of marine safety management systems.
2. The organization's expenses were $284,033 for its largest program service, which was training and certifying members in marine inspections.
3. Financial data shows the organization had $308,646 in revenue and $357,066 in total expenses, resulting in a $48,642 loss for the current year.
The document provides information about an afterschool programme on accounting, economics and business run by the Centre for Social Entrepreneurship. It is the world's most comprehensive programme on social and spiritual entrepreneurship and is open and free for all.
Developing a Culture of Strategic PhilanthropyChelsie Layman
This document discusses developing a culture of strategic philanthropy. It defines strategic philanthropy as businesses, communities, and employees coming together to make a difference through employee engagement programs, giveback services, and tax reform initiatives. The document outlines a spectrum of philanthropic commitment from personal to corporate levels and strategies companies use like employee giving accounts, matching funds, and paid volunteer hours. It also discusses trends in charitable giving and how human resources functions can support corporate social responsibility and strategic philanthropy initiatives.
This document is a checklist for counselors assisting clients in preparing Group of Five Sponsorship Applications. It contains over 30 questions to guide counselors in ensuring applications are complete and contain all necessary information and documentation. Key areas the checklist covers include choosing an application option, confirming eligibility of group members, including all family members on applications, outlining adequate financial and settlement plans, and providing up-to-date proof of income documentation. The comprehensive checklist aims to help applications be as thorough and compliant as possible to facilitate review by Canadian immigration.
This document is a checklist for counselors assisting clients with Group of Five Sponsorship Applications. It contains over 30 questions to guide counselors in ensuring applications are complete. Key areas the checklist covers include: choosing an option to submit the IMM 6000 package, ensuring the group has at least 5 members who meet eligibility criteria, completing separate refugee applicant forms, listing all family members, understanding sponsorship obligations, providing adequate financial and settlement support details, and submitting complete financial profiles for group members contributing income. The checklist aims to have counselors thoroughly review applications to help ensure they meet all requirements.
Expenses totaled $5,455,648 including grants of $0 and revenue was $5,720,282. The largest program services by expense were events at $2,198,181, member services at $1,161,171, and professional development at $765,741.
Reference my post dated April 30th, 2015 for more details on this report and it's meaning in relation to the #CodeGate scandal @ https://procureinsights.wordpress.com/2015/04/30/when-it-comes-to-the-nigp-just-follow-the-money-mr-hansen-follow-the-money-by-jon-hansen/
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
ACC 460 Week 1 Case 1-14 Research Case- Comparing Financial Reporting Objectives
ACC 460 Week 1 Ex 2-16 Matching Fund Types with Fund Categories
CME on Activity Advances Accountability(Rwenzori)Jimmy Onenarach
The document is a presentation on activity fund request and accountability processes at Baylor Uganda. It discusses the vision and mission of Baylor Uganda, the objective to refresh staff on fund request and accountability processes. It then covers the fund requisition process which begins with an approved work plan and terms of reference (TOR). A proper TOR includes a narrative with objectives and methodology, and a financial component with a budget. It also discusses advance payment requests, spending funds, and the importance of accountability which requires supporting documentation and a report on results. The presentation emphasizes integrity and following proper procedures in the fund request and accountability cycles.
[removed]
1
Governmental and Not-for-Profit Accounting
Fall 2016
Project (100 points)
Obtain a copy of Comprehensive A
nnual Financial Report (CAFR) o
nline, either from Blackboard or
on the website of any municipality of your selection. Review t
he CAFR you select and answer the
following questions. Your answers
should be concise but to the
point.
This is an individual project
. You can collaborate with others
but you should submit project answers
individually. If you collaborat
e with your classmate(s), you s
hould indicate the name of persons you
collaborate with in the project.
A word about answering the questio
ns below: Don’t just answer “
yes” or “no”; try to elaborate by
combining the knowledge you learnt
from the class. This certai
nly will help you e
arn better grade
from this project.
You are required to type the ans
wers. Present your answers in
a nice and neat format; just think about
how you would make it easier to
read. A portion of your grade
will be based on the p
resentation of
project.
Part I Overview of report
1.
What are three main sections of the report?
2.
Review the introductory secti
on of the CAFR. What are key issu
es addressed in the letter of
transmittal?
3.
Review the financial section.
a.
Does the report provide a r
econciliation betw
een total governme
ntal net position per the
government-wide statement of net position and total governmenta
l fund balances per the
governmental funds balance sheet? If so, what are the main rec
onciling items?
b.
What are the major governmental
funds maintained by the entity?
c.
Does the report include “require
d supplementary information?”
If so, what are the main
areas addressed?
d.
Does the report include “combin
ing statements?” If so, what is
the nature of these
statements?
4.
Review the statistical section.
a.
What is the population of th
e entity being reported on?
b.
Who is the entity’s major employer?
c.
What is the amount of net debt per
capita? The city’s legal de
bt margin? The amount of
direct and overlapping debt?
5.
Component units
a.
Does the notes to the financial s
tatements indicate the compone
nt units that are included
within the reporting entity? D
o they indicate any units that a
re not included? Do they
explain why these units are
included or excluded?
b.
How are the component units presented in the government-wide fi
nancial statements? In
the fund statements?
2
Part II Budget
1.
In which section of the CAFR are
the budget-to-actual compariso
ns of the major funds?
a.
Which accounting basis did the City follow to prepare its annua
l operating budget?
b.
Are the actual amounts on a GAAP or a budgetary basis? Do the
statements include a
reconciliation of any difference
s between GAAP and budgetary am
ounts? If so, what are
the largest reconciled items?
c.
Are the reported variances base
d on the original budget or the
year-end amended budget?
2.
Does the CAFR include budget-to-
actual comparisons of nonmajor
funds? If so, in what sections?
3.
Do.
This document is an annual filing form for charitable organizations in New York State. It collects general information about the organization such as its name, address, employer identification number, the fiscal year covered in the filing, and certification by two officers. It also determines whether the organization qualifies for an exemption from submitting additional schedules based on its financial activity. If not exempt, it requires additional schedules be submitted providing details on professional fundraisers used and government contributions received.
This document is an annual filing form for charitable organizations in New York State. It collects general information about the organization such as its name, address, employer identification number, the fiscal year covered in the filing, and certification by two officers. It also determines whether the organization qualifies for an annual report exemption or must complete additional schedules providing details about government grants, professional fundraisers, and financial information.
This document is an annual filing form for charitable organizations in New York State. It requires general information about the organization, a certification signed by two officers, information about annual report exemptions, additional schedules if required, fee payment instructions, and a checklist of required document attachments. The form collects information needed by the New York State Department of Law (Office of the Attorney General) Charities Bureau to register and oversee charitable organizations.
Camus borrows philosophical ideas from existentialist writers to interpret the existence of individuals in his works. He depicts the myth of Sisyphus, in which Sisyphus is condemned to eternally roll a boulder up a hill only for it to roll back down, as representing the absurdity and meaninglessness of life. However, Camus argues that Sisyphus and other tragic figures can find happiness by accepting their fate rather than rebelling against it. Through alluding to other philosophers and myths, Camus explores what it means to live an authentic life in a universe devoid of higher meaning.
- The document provides information about accounting homework help and solutions available for purchase online at www.onlinehelpstudy.com for various accounting and economics courses, exams, and assignments.
- Sample questions and solutions are provided for accounting, economics, finance, and taxation topics. Prices for full solutions to homework questions, exams, and case studies range from $3 to $10 depending on length and complexity.
- Customers can purchase step-by-step solutions immediately without needing to register an account on the site. The solutions are described as "RATED A+" quality.
The document provides information about accounting homework help and solutions available for purchase online. It lists courses, exams, and assignments that can be completed, noting they are rated "A+" without needing registration. Clicking the links would direct the user to the online site to purchase assistance with accounting work.
- The document provides information about and links to purchase assistance with accounting homework, exams, and assignments. It advertises immediate access to solutions for entire courses and exams without needing to register.
- Sample questions and assignments are provided for accounting, economics, finance, tax, and cost accounting courses. The document seeks payment to view the full questions, solutions, and explanations.
The document provides information about accounting homework help and solutions available for purchase online. It lists courses, exams, and assignments that can be completed, noting they are rated "A+" without needing registration. Clicking the links would direct the user to the online site to purchase assistance with accounting work.
Coding NotesImproving Diagnosis By Jacquie zegan, CCS, w.docxmary772
Coding Notes
Improving
Diagnosis
By Jacquie zegan, CCS, wC
Specificity in ICD-IO Coding
VALID ICD-IO-CM/PCS (ICD-IO) codes have been required for claims reporting since October 1, 2015. But ICD-IO diagnosis coding to the correct level of specificity—a more recent requirement—continues to be a problem for many in the healthcare industry. While diagnosis code specificity has always been the goal, providers were granted a reprieve in order to facilitate implementation of ICD-IO. For the first 12 months of ICD-IO use, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) promised that Medicare review contractors would not deny claims "based solely on the specificity of the ICD-IO diagnosis code as long as the physician/practitioner used a valid code from the right family."l Commonly referred to as the "grace period," this flexibility was intended to help providers implement the ICD-IO-CM code set and was never intended to continue on in perpetuity. In fact, this CMS-granted grace period expired on October 1, 2016.2
Unfortunately, nonspecific documentation and coding persists. This is an ongoing problem, even though the official guidelines for coding and reporting require coding to the highest degree of specificity. Third-party payers are making payment determinations based on the specificity of reported codes, and payment reform efforts are formulating policies based on coded data. The significance of overreporting unspecified diagnosis codes cannot be understated. In the short term, it will increase claim denials, and in the long term it may adversely impact emerging payment models.3•4 Calculating and monitoring unspecified diagnosis code rates is critical to successfully leverage specificity
44/Journal of AHIMA April 18
in the ICD-IO-CM code set.
An ICD-IO-CM code is considered unspecified if either of the terms "unspecified" or "NOS" are used in the code description. The unspecified diagnosis code rate is calculated by dividing the number of unspecified diagnosis codes by the total number of diagnosis codes assigned. Health information management (HIM) professionals should be tracking and trending unspecified diagnosis code rates across the continuum of care.5
Acceptable use of Unspecified Diagnosis Codes Unspecified diagnosis codes have acceptable, even necessary, uses. The unspecified code rate is not an error rate, but rather an indicator of the quality of clinical documentation and a qualitative measure of coder performance and coding results. Even CMS explicitly recognizes that unspecified codes are sometimes necessary. "When sufficient clinical information is not known or available about a particular health condition to assign a more specific code, it is acceptable to report the appropriate unspecified code."6 It's also important that coding professionals use good judgment to avoid unnecessary queries for clarification of unspecified diagnoses. The official coding guidelines provide explicit guidance for appropriate uses of unspec.
CNL-521 Topic 3 Vargas Case StudyBob and Elizabeth arrive.docxmary772
CNL-521 Topic 3: Vargas Case Study
Bob and Elizabeth arrive together for the third session. As planned, you remind the couple that the goal of today’s session is to gather information about their families of origin. Bob begins by telling you about his older sister, Katie, who is 36 and lives nearby with her three children. Katie’s husband, Steve, died suddenly last year at the age of 40 when the car he was driving hit a block wall. Elizabeth speculates that Steve was intoxicated at the time, but Bob vehemently denies this allegation. He warns Elizabeth to “never again” suggest alcohol was involved. You note Bob’s strong response and learn that his own biological father, whom his mother divorced when Bob was 3 and Katie was 5, had been an alcoholic. When asked about his father, Bob says, “His name is Tim, and I haven’t seen him since the divorce.” Bob shares that he only remembers frequently hiding under the bed with Katie to stay safe from his violent rages. He adds that 5 years after the divorce, his mother, Linda, married Noel who has been “the only dad I’ve ever known.” He insists that his sister married “a devout Christian who never touched alcohol” and attributed the 3:00 a.m. tragedy to fatigue. He adds that a few days before the accident, Katie had complained to him that her husband had been working many late nights and “just wasn’t himself.” Bob speaks fondly of his sister and confirms that they have always been “very close.”
From Elizabeth, who is 31 years old, you learn that she was adopted by her parents, Rita and Gary, who were in their late 40s at the time. They were first generation immigrants who had no family in the United States. Their biological daughter, Susan, had died 10 years earlier after Rita accidentally ran over the 5 year old while backing out of the driveway. Elizabeth surmises that her mother never fully recovered from this traumatic incident and remained distant and withdrawn throughout Elizabeth’s life. Elizabeth describes her father, Gary, as “a hard worker, smart, and always serious.” She shares that most of her family memories were of times spent with her dad in his study, surrounded by books. She states, “He could find the answer to all of my questions in one his many books.” Elizabeth describes herself as the “quiet, bookish type” and attributes her love for books to her father. Like her father in his study, Elizabeth remembers spending most of her adolescence alone in her room, reading, so she would not upset her mother. Looking back, Elizabeth tells you she recognizes her mother’s struggle with depression, “but as a kid, I thought it was me.”
You comment on the vastly different childhood experiences and normalize the potential for relationship challenges under these circumstances. Acknowledging the differences, Elizabeth remarks that Bob’s relationship with his family was one of the things that she was attracted to early in their relationship. Bob agrees with her and comments that Katie and Elizabeth.
More Related Content
Similar to Code Expenses $ including grants of $ Revenue $Code .docx
AILA needs absolute finance transparency. Bryan Johnson
How is staff compensation (a cool 6 million) GREATER than revenue from membership dues (5 million)? Without a full account of every penny spent, I'm suspicious.
1. The organization's mission is to train and certify members in conducting marine inspections and audits of marine safety management systems.
2. The organization's expenses were $284,033 for its largest program service, which was training and certifying members in marine inspections.
3. Financial data shows the organization had $308,646 in revenue and $357,066 in total expenses, resulting in a $48,642 loss for the current year.
The document provides information about an afterschool programme on accounting, economics and business run by the Centre for Social Entrepreneurship. It is the world's most comprehensive programme on social and spiritual entrepreneurship and is open and free for all.
Developing a Culture of Strategic PhilanthropyChelsie Layman
This document discusses developing a culture of strategic philanthropy. It defines strategic philanthropy as businesses, communities, and employees coming together to make a difference through employee engagement programs, giveback services, and tax reform initiatives. The document outlines a spectrum of philanthropic commitment from personal to corporate levels and strategies companies use like employee giving accounts, matching funds, and paid volunteer hours. It also discusses trends in charitable giving and how human resources functions can support corporate social responsibility and strategic philanthropy initiatives.
This document is a checklist for counselors assisting clients in preparing Group of Five Sponsorship Applications. It contains over 30 questions to guide counselors in ensuring applications are complete and contain all necessary information and documentation. Key areas the checklist covers include choosing an application option, confirming eligibility of group members, including all family members on applications, outlining adequate financial and settlement plans, and providing up-to-date proof of income documentation. The comprehensive checklist aims to help applications be as thorough and compliant as possible to facilitate review by Canadian immigration.
This document is a checklist for counselors assisting clients with Group of Five Sponsorship Applications. It contains over 30 questions to guide counselors in ensuring applications are complete. Key areas the checklist covers include: choosing an option to submit the IMM 6000 package, ensuring the group has at least 5 members who meet eligibility criteria, completing separate refugee applicant forms, listing all family members, understanding sponsorship obligations, providing adequate financial and settlement support details, and submitting complete financial profiles for group members contributing income. The checklist aims to have counselors thoroughly review applications to help ensure they meet all requirements.
Expenses totaled $5,455,648 including grants of $0 and revenue was $5,720,282. The largest program services by expense were events at $2,198,181, member services at $1,161,171, and professional development at $765,741.
Reference my post dated April 30th, 2015 for more details on this report and it's meaning in relation to the #CodeGate scandal @ https://procureinsights.wordpress.com/2015/04/30/when-it-comes-to-the-nigp-just-follow-the-money-mr-hansen-follow-the-money-by-jon-hansen/
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
ACC 460 Week 1 Case 1-14 Research Case- Comparing Financial Reporting Objectives
ACC 460 Week 1 Ex 2-16 Matching Fund Types with Fund Categories
CME on Activity Advances Accountability(Rwenzori)Jimmy Onenarach
The document is a presentation on activity fund request and accountability processes at Baylor Uganda. It discusses the vision and mission of Baylor Uganda, the objective to refresh staff on fund request and accountability processes. It then covers the fund requisition process which begins with an approved work plan and terms of reference (TOR). A proper TOR includes a narrative with objectives and methodology, and a financial component with a budget. It also discusses advance payment requests, spending funds, and the importance of accountability which requires supporting documentation and a report on results. The presentation emphasizes integrity and following proper procedures in the fund request and accountability cycles.
[removed]
1
Governmental and Not-for-Profit Accounting
Fall 2016
Project (100 points)
Obtain a copy of Comprehensive A
nnual Financial Report (CAFR) o
nline, either from Blackboard or
on the website of any municipality of your selection. Review t
he CAFR you select and answer the
following questions. Your answers
should be concise but to the
point.
This is an individual project
. You can collaborate with others
but you should submit project answers
individually. If you collaborat
e with your classmate(s), you s
hould indicate the name of persons you
collaborate with in the project.
A word about answering the questio
ns below: Don’t just answer “
yes” or “no”; try to elaborate by
combining the knowledge you learnt
from the class. This certai
nly will help you e
arn better grade
from this project.
You are required to type the ans
wers. Present your answers in
a nice and neat format; just think about
how you would make it easier to
read. A portion of your grade
will be based on the p
resentation of
project.
Part I Overview of report
1.
What are three main sections of the report?
2.
Review the introductory secti
on of the CAFR. What are key issu
es addressed in the letter of
transmittal?
3.
Review the financial section.
a.
Does the report provide a r
econciliation betw
een total governme
ntal net position per the
government-wide statement of net position and total governmenta
l fund balances per the
governmental funds balance sheet? If so, what are the main rec
onciling items?
b.
What are the major governmental
funds maintained by the entity?
c.
Does the report include “require
d supplementary information?”
If so, what are the main
areas addressed?
d.
Does the report include “combin
ing statements?” If so, what is
the nature of these
statements?
4.
Review the statistical section.
a.
What is the population of th
e entity being reported on?
b.
Who is the entity’s major employer?
c.
What is the amount of net debt per
capita? The city’s legal de
bt margin? The amount of
direct and overlapping debt?
5.
Component units
a.
Does the notes to the financial s
tatements indicate the compone
nt units that are included
within the reporting entity? D
o they indicate any units that a
re not included? Do they
explain why these units are
included or excluded?
b.
How are the component units presented in the government-wide fi
nancial statements? In
the fund statements?
2
Part II Budget
1.
In which section of the CAFR are
the budget-to-actual compariso
ns of the major funds?
a.
Which accounting basis did the City follow to prepare its annua
l operating budget?
b.
Are the actual amounts on a GAAP or a budgetary basis? Do the
statements include a
reconciliation of any difference
s between GAAP and budgetary am
ounts? If so, what are
the largest reconciled items?
c.
Are the reported variances base
d on the original budget or the
year-end amended budget?
2.
Does the CAFR include budget-to-
actual comparisons of nonmajor
funds? If so, in what sections?
3.
Do.
This document is an annual filing form for charitable organizations in New York State. It collects general information about the organization such as its name, address, employer identification number, the fiscal year covered in the filing, and certification by two officers. It also determines whether the organization qualifies for an exemption from submitting additional schedules based on its financial activity. If not exempt, it requires additional schedules be submitted providing details on professional fundraisers used and government contributions received.
This document is an annual filing form for charitable organizations in New York State. It collects general information about the organization such as its name, address, employer identification number, the fiscal year covered in the filing, and certification by two officers. It also determines whether the organization qualifies for an annual report exemption or must complete additional schedules providing details about government grants, professional fundraisers, and financial information.
This document is an annual filing form for charitable organizations in New York State. It requires general information about the organization, a certification signed by two officers, information about annual report exemptions, additional schedules if required, fee payment instructions, and a checklist of required document attachments. The form collects information needed by the New York State Department of Law (Office of the Attorney General) Charities Bureau to register and oversee charitable organizations.
Camus borrows philosophical ideas from existentialist writers to interpret the existence of individuals in his works. He depicts the myth of Sisyphus, in which Sisyphus is condemned to eternally roll a boulder up a hill only for it to roll back down, as representing the absurdity and meaninglessness of life. However, Camus argues that Sisyphus and other tragic figures can find happiness by accepting their fate rather than rebelling against it. Through alluding to other philosophers and myths, Camus explores what it means to live an authentic life in a universe devoid of higher meaning.
- The document provides information about accounting homework help and solutions available for purchase online at www.onlinehelpstudy.com for various accounting and economics courses, exams, and assignments.
- Sample questions and solutions are provided for accounting, economics, finance, and taxation topics. Prices for full solutions to homework questions, exams, and case studies range from $3 to $10 depending on length and complexity.
- Customers can purchase step-by-step solutions immediately without needing to register an account on the site. The solutions are described as "RATED A+" quality.
The document provides information about accounting homework help and solutions available for purchase online. It lists courses, exams, and assignments that can be completed, noting they are rated "A+" without needing registration. Clicking the links would direct the user to the online site to purchase assistance with accounting work.
- The document provides information about and links to purchase assistance with accounting homework, exams, and assignments. It advertises immediate access to solutions for entire courses and exams without needing to register.
- Sample questions and assignments are provided for accounting, economics, finance, tax, and cost accounting courses. The document seeks payment to view the full questions, solutions, and explanations.
The document provides information about accounting homework help and solutions available for purchase online. It lists courses, exams, and assignments that can be completed, noting they are rated "A+" without needing registration. Clicking the links would direct the user to the online site to purchase assistance with accounting work.
Similar to Code Expenses $ including grants of $ Revenue $Code .docx (20)
Coding NotesImproving Diagnosis By Jacquie zegan, CCS, w.docxmary772
Coding Notes
Improving
Diagnosis
By Jacquie zegan, CCS, wC
Specificity in ICD-IO Coding
VALID ICD-IO-CM/PCS (ICD-IO) codes have been required for claims reporting since October 1, 2015. But ICD-IO diagnosis coding to the correct level of specificity—a more recent requirement—continues to be a problem for many in the healthcare industry. While diagnosis code specificity has always been the goal, providers were granted a reprieve in order to facilitate implementation of ICD-IO. For the first 12 months of ICD-IO use, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) promised that Medicare review contractors would not deny claims "based solely on the specificity of the ICD-IO diagnosis code as long as the physician/practitioner used a valid code from the right family."l Commonly referred to as the "grace period," this flexibility was intended to help providers implement the ICD-IO-CM code set and was never intended to continue on in perpetuity. In fact, this CMS-granted grace period expired on October 1, 2016.2
Unfortunately, nonspecific documentation and coding persists. This is an ongoing problem, even though the official guidelines for coding and reporting require coding to the highest degree of specificity. Third-party payers are making payment determinations based on the specificity of reported codes, and payment reform efforts are formulating policies based on coded data. The significance of overreporting unspecified diagnosis codes cannot be understated. In the short term, it will increase claim denials, and in the long term it may adversely impact emerging payment models.3•4 Calculating and monitoring unspecified diagnosis code rates is critical to successfully leverage specificity
44/Journal of AHIMA April 18
in the ICD-IO-CM code set.
An ICD-IO-CM code is considered unspecified if either of the terms "unspecified" or "NOS" are used in the code description. The unspecified diagnosis code rate is calculated by dividing the number of unspecified diagnosis codes by the total number of diagnosis codes assigned. Health information management (HIM) professionals should be tracking and trending unspecified diagnosis code rates across the continuum of care.5
Acceptable use of Unspecified Diagnosis Codes Unspecified diagnosis codes have acceptable, even necessary, uses. The unspecified code rate is not an error rate, but rather an indicator of the quality of clinical documentation and a qualitative measure of coder performance and coding results. Even CMS explicitly recognizes that unspecified codes are sometimes necessary. "When sufficient clinical information is not known or available about a particular health condition to assign a more specific code, it is acceptable to report the appropriate unspecified code."6 It's also important that coding professionals use good judgment to avoid unnecessary queries for clarification of unspecified diagnoses. The official coding guidelines provide explicit guidance for appropriate uses of unspec.
CNL-521 Topic 3 Vargas Case StudyBob and Elizabeth arrive.docxmary772
CNL-521 Topic 3: Vargas Case Study
Bob and Elizabeth arrive together for the third session. As planned, you remind the couple that the goal of today’s session is to gather information about their families of origin. Bob begins by telling you about his older sister, Katie, who is 36 and lives nearby with her three children. Katie’s husband, Steve, died suddenly last year at the age of 40 when the car he was driving hit a block wall. Elizabeth speculates that Steve was intoxicated at the time, but Bob vehemently denies this allegation. He warns Elizabeth to “never again” suggest alcohol was involved. You note Bob’s strong response and learn that his own biological father, whom his mother divorced when Bob was 3 and Katie was 5, had been an alcoholic. When asked about his father, Bob says, “His name is Tim, and I haven’t seen him since the divorce.” Bob shares that he only remembers frequently hiding under the bed with Katie to stay safe from his violent rages. He adds that 5 years after the divorce, his mother, Linda, married Noel who has been “the only dad I’ve ever known.” He insists that his sister married “a devout Christian who never touched alcohol” and attributed the 3:00 a.m. tragedy to fatigue. He adds that a few days before the accident, Katie had complained to him that her husband had been working many late nights and “just wasn’t himself.” Bob speaks fondly of his sister and confirms that they have always been “very close.”
From Elizabeth, who is 31 years old, you learn that she was adopted by her parents, Rita and Gary, who were in their late 40s at the time. They were first generation immigrants who had no family in the United States. Their biological daughter, Susan, had died 10 years earlier after Rita accidentally ran over the 5 year old while backing out of the driveway. Elizabeth surmises that her mother never fully recovered from this traumatic incident and remained distant and withdrawn throughout Elizabeth’s life. Elizabeth describes her father, Gary, as “a hard worker, smart, and always serious.” She shares that most of her family memories were of times spent with her dad in his study, surrounded by books. She states, “He could find the answer to all of my questions in one his many books.” Elizabeth describes herself as the “quiet, bookish type” and attributes her love for books to her father. Like her father in his study, Elizabeth remembers spending most of her adolescence alone in her room, reading, so she would not upset her mother. Looking back, Elizabeth tells you she recognizes her mother’s struggle with depression, “but as a kid, I thought it was me.”
You comment on the vastly different childhood experiences and normalize the potential for relationship challenges under these circumstances. Acknowledging the differences, Elizabeth remarks that Bob’s relationship with his family was one of the things that she was attracted to early in their relationship. Bob agrees with her and comments that Katie and Elizabeth.
Cognitive and Language Development Milestones Picture Book[WLO .docxmary772
Cognitive and Language Development Milestones Picture Book
[WLO: 1] [CLO: 1]
Prior to beginning work on this assignment,
Review Chapters 6, 7, and 9 of your text.
Review the cognition and language development milestones from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on the web page
Basic Information (Links to an external site.)
.
Identify one age-group that you will discuss:
Infancy: Birth to 12 months
Toddler: 1 to 3 years
Early childhood: 4 to 8 years
Review and download the
Cognitive and Language Development Milestones Picture Book Template.
The purpose of this assignment is to creatively demonstrate an understanding of developmental milestones as they pertain to cognition and language development.
Part 1:
Based on the required resources above, create a children’s picture book using
StoryJumper (Links to an external site.)
that tells a story about a child’s typical day. Your story must incorporate at least four cognitive and four language development milestones for the age-group you have selected. Your story can be about a fictional child or can be based on a real child. Watch the video,
StoryJumper Tutorial (Links to an external site.)
, for assistance in using StoryJumper.
To complete this assignment, you must
Create a children’s picture book using StoryJumper.
Identify at least four cognitive development milestones appropriate to the age-group selected.
Distinguish at least four language development milestones appropriate to the age-group selected.
Discuss a typical day appropriate to the age-group selected.
Part 2:
Open the
Cognitive and Language Development Milestones Picture Book Template
and complete the following items:
Provide the link to the StoryJumper picture book you created in Part 1.
Indicate which age-group your picture book will discuss.
List at least four cognitive development milestones that are included in your picture book.
List at least four language development milestones that are included in your picture book.
Submit your Word document to Waypoint.
The Cognitive and Language Development Milestones Picture Book:
Must be eight to 10 pages of text in length (not including title page, images, and references page) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s
APA Style (Links to an external site.)
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of picture book
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s
Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.)
Must include a separate references page or slide that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the
Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.)
resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.
CHAPTER 6 SUMMARY
Piaget’s Cognitive-Developmental Theory.
Codes of (un)dress and gender constructs from the Greek to t.docxmary772
Codes of (un)dress and gender constructs
from the Greek to the Roman world
he
By 6th c. BC: Greek male and female dress codes firmly established
Archaic kouros
and kore statues
demonstrate how
the body was
used in the
naturalization of
gender
constructs
The naked male
body in the
classical period:
the Doryphoros as
a heroic athlete-
warrior citizen
Male sexuality: conditions by the patriarchal ideology of
domination, it restricted sexual expression and freedom
in homosexual
relations
and heterosexual
relations
In the classical
period,
while the naked
male body was
idealized and
heroized,
the female naked
body was always
sexualized and
objectified.
Centauromachy (late 5th c.
Bassae): the Greek female is
defenseless and sexualized
(must be defended by Greek
men).
Gendered
nakedness in
mythological
scenes:
the Greek
male is
always
heroized
Amazonomachy (4th c.
Halikarnassos): the non-
Greek female is wild and
sexualized (must be
dominated by Greek men).
Aphrodite (Roman Venus): at first fully dressed
The gradual disrobing of Aphrodite in monumental statues, late 5th to
4th c. BC (Roman copies)
“Venus Genetrix”,
original late 5th c. BC
“Venus of Capua”,
original 4th c. BC
Aphrodite of Knidos,
original 4th c. BC
Late 5th c. onwards: minor goddesses were also represented sexualized in
statues, but only Aphrodite appeared entirely naked by the 4th c. BC.
Nike (Victory), late
5th c., Olympia.
Aphrodite of Knidos by
Praxiteles, 4th c. (Roman copy)
Aphrodite “Beautiful
Buttocks”, Roman
copy (Greek ca. 300).
Doryphoros and
Aphrodite of Knidos
(Knidia or Knidian
Aphrodite), Roman
copies.
What main
differences do you
observe?
Was her nakedness
really threatening to
patriarchy (Andrew
Stewart)?
Or, in what ways
was her nakedness
aligned with
patriarchal ideology?
Could she have been
empowering for
women?
The traditional visual
presence of a divine
statue at the far end of
a rectangular temple
was very different
(Olympian Zeus)
Aphrodite of Knidos was displayed in an unusual temple (round plan), so as to
be seen from all sides, like a beautiful object.
The original
Aphrodite of
Knidos is lost.
Numerous
Roman copies
of the Knidian
Aphrodite exist
(with variations
in details).
“Colonna
Venus” Vatican
Museums.
“Ludovisi
Venus”,
Palazzo
Altemps, Rome
(only the torso
is ancient, the
rest is 17th-c,
restoration.)
Capitoline Venus, Rome
Medici Venus, Florence
Variations on the
“Venus pudica” type,
Greek Hellenistic
originals, Roman
copies.
Are they more modest
or also more shamed?
Latin pudore: modesty,
chastity, shame.
Greek aidos: shame,
modesty
(aidion=vagina)
There is no male “pudicus”
type in Greco-Roman
sculpture.
These unequal gender
constructs are still around
today,
to the detriment of all of us!
There is no male
“pudicus” type in Greco-
Roman sculpture.
An effec.
Coding Assignment 3CSC 330 Advanced Data Structures, Spri.docxmary772
Coding Assignment 3
CSC 330: Advanced Data Structures, Spring 2019
Released Monday, April 15, 2019
Due on Canvas on Wednesday, May 1, at 11:59pm
Overview
In this assignment, you’ll implement another variant of a height-balancing tree known as a
splay tree. The assignment will also give you an opportunity to work with Java inheritance;
in particular, the base code that you’ll amend is structured so that your SplayTree class
extends from an abstract class called HeightBalancingTree, which gives a general template
for how a height-balancing tree should be defined.
As always, please carefully read the entire write-up before you begin coding your submission.
Splay Trees
As mentioned above, a splay tree is another example of a height-balancing tree — a binary
search tree that, upon either an insertion or deletion, modifies the tree through a sequence
of rotations in order to reduce the overall height of the tree.
However, splay trees differ from the other height-balancing trees we’ve seen (AVL trees,
red-black trees) in terms of the type of guarantees that they provide. In particular, recall
that both AVL trees and red-black trees maintain the property that after any insertion or
deletion, the height of the tree is O(log n), where n is the number of elements in the tree.
Splay trees unfortunately do not provide this (fairly strong) guarantee; namely, it is possible
for the height of a splay tree to become greater than O(log n) over a sequence of insertions
and deletions.
Instead, splay trees provide a slightly weaker (though still meaningful) guarantee known as
an amortized bound, which is essentially just a bound on the average time of a single opera-
tion over the course of several operations. In the context of splay trees, one can show that
over the course of, say, n insertions to build a tree with n elements, the average time of each
of these operations is O(log n) (but again, keeping in mind it is possible for any single one
of these operations to take much longer than this).
Showing this guarantee is beyond the scope of this course (although the details of the analy-
sis can be found in your textbook). Instead, in this assignment, we will just be in interested
1
r splay:
N
root
root
2
1
1
2
l splay:
N
1
2
rr splay:
N
N
N
ll splay:
rl splay:
1
2
N
lr splay:
Figure 1: Illustration of the six possible cases for on a given step of a splay operation.
in writing an implementation of a splay tree in Java that is structured using inheritance.
Splay Tree Insertions and Deletions
To insert or delete an element from the tree, splay trees use the same approach as the other
height-balancing trees we’ve discussed in class — first we insert/deletion an element using
standard BST procedures, and then perform a “height-fixing” procedure that rebalances the
tree. Thus, what distinguishes each of these height-balancing trees from one another is how
they define their height-fixing procedures.
To fix the tree after both inser.
CodeZipButtonDemo.javaCodeZipButtonDemo.java Demonstrate a p.docxmary772
CodeZip/ButtonDemo.javaCodeZip/ButtonDemo.java// Demonstrate a push button and handle action events.
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import javax.swing.*;
publicclassButtonDemoimplementsActionListener{
JLabel jlab;
JTextField jtf;
ButtonDemo(){
// Create a new JFrame container.
JFrame jfrm =newJFrame("A Button Example");
// Specify FlowLayout for the layout manager.
jfrm.setLayout(newFlowLayout());
// Give the frame an initial size.
jfrm.setSize(220,90);
// Terminate the program when the user closes the application.
jfrm.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
// Make two buttons.
JButton jbtnUp =newJButton("Up");
JButton jbtnDown =newJButton("Down");
// Create a text field.
jtf =newJTextField(10);
// Add action listeners.
jbtnUp.addActionListener(this);
jbtnDown.addActionListener(this);
// Add the buttons to the content pane.
jfrm.add(jbtnUp);
jfrm.add(jbtnDown);
jfrm.add(jtf);
// Create a label.
jlab =newJLabel("Press a button.");
// Add the label to the frame.
jfrm.add(jlab);
// Display the frame.
jfrm.setVisible(true);
}
// Handle button events.
publicvoid actionPerformed(ActionEvent ae){
if(ae.getActionCommand().equals("Up")){
jlab.setText("You pressed Up.");
FileClock clock1=newFileClock(jtf);
Thread thread1=newThread(clock1);
thread1.start();
}
else
jlab.setText("You pressed down. ");
}
publicstaticvoid main(String args[]){
// Create the frame on the event dispatching thread.
SwingUtilities.invokeLater(newRunnable(){
publicvoid run(){
newButtonDemo();
}
});
}
}
CodeZip/CBDemo.javaCodeZip/CBDemo.java// Demonstrate check boxes.
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import javax.swing.*;
publicclassCBDemoimplementsItemListener{
JLabel jlabSelected;
JLabel jlabChanged;
JCheckBox jcbAlpha;
JCheckBox jcbBeta;
JCheckBox jcbGamma;
CBDemo(){
// Create a new JFrame container.
JFrame jfrm =newJFrame("Demonstrate Check Boxes");
// Specify FlowLayout for the layout manager.
jfrm.setLayout(newFlowLayout());
// Give the frame an initial size.
jfrm.setSize(280,120);
// Terminate the program when the user closes the application.
jfrm.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
// Create empty labels.
jlabSelected =newJLabel("");
jlabChanged =newJLabel("");
// Make check boxes.
jcbAlpha =newJCheckBox("Alpha");
jcbBeta =newJCheckBox("Beta");
jcbGamma =newJCheckBox("Gamma");
// Events generated by the check boxes
// are handled in common by the itemStateChanged()
// method implemented by CBDemo.
jcbAlpha.addItemListener(this);
jcbBeta.addItemListener(this);
jcbGamma.addItemListener(this);
// Add checkboxes and labels to the content pane.
jfrm.add(jcbAlpha);
jfrm.add(jcbBeta);
jfrm.add(jcbGamma);
jfrm.add(jlabChanged);
jfrm.add(jlabSelected);
// Display the frame.
jfrm.setVisible(true);
}
// This is the handler for the check boxes..
CoevolutionOver the ages, many species have become irremediably .docxmary772
Coevolution
Over the ages, many species have become irremediably linked. Whether in the context of an arms race or cooperation to conquer new ecosystems, they have no choice but to evolve together . According to Paul Ehrlich and Peter Raven, who introduced the term in 1964, "Coevolution is the evolution of two or more entities caused by the action between these entities of reciprocal selective factors. Organizations must therefore influence each other (Thompson, 1989). Coevolution relates to this week’s theme by the how natural selection affects the ecosystem. The book compares coevolution to an ecological arm race (Bensel & Turk, 2014). One example is a case of bats as stated in the book and their use of echolocation to be able to find insects. One insect that tries to outsmart it is a tiger moth which blocks out and jam’s the bats signal with a high frequency clicks and the bat fly’s erratically to confuse the moth. This is important in adaptation and of evolution of any new biological species. There are two kinds of interactions that happen that can lead to competitive coevolution. One interactions is predation in which one organism kills another organism. The second one is parasitism in which one organism benefits by damaging but not killing another organism.
This term affects living things and the physical world because if we didn’t have the natural selection all our ecosystem who would be extinct including human beings. Many recent studies state that environmental changes have messed with the balance between interacting species and leading to their extinction. When we use the three models of coevolution such as competition, predation, mutualism in organizing and synthesizing ways to modify species interaction when there is climate change in favoring one species over another. Coevolution reduces the effects of climate change and leads to lowering chances in extinction. By getting an understanding of our nature of coevolution in how they interact with different species and our communities interact and respond to the changing climate.
We as human kind must take action and not let our natural system and ecosystem suffer because of our greed for economic growth (Cairns, 2007). We must also be careful of our matriac consumption and forget about ecological and sustainability ethics. (Cairns, 2007). Humans need to take action to better take care of our ecosystem and environment. Morowitz (1992) stated in this journal, “Sustained life is a property of an ecological system rather than a single organism or species.” There are no species that can exist without the ecological life support system even humans (Cairns, 2007). We need to put more effort in taking care of our environment by creating more organizations in getting our communities involved. In achieving sustainability they must guide through ecological and sustainability ethics. There are many challenges that will come but with achieving sustainable use of our planet our environment will .
Coding Component (50)Weve provided you with an implementation .docxmary772
Coding Component (50%)
We've provided you with an implementation of an unbalanced binary search tree. The tree implements an ordered dynamic set over a generic comparable type T. Supported operations include insertion, deletion, min, max, and testing whether a value is in the set (via the exists method). Because it's a set, duplicates are not allowed, and the insert operation will not insert a value if it is already present.
We have implemented the BST operations in a recursive style. For example, inserting a value into a tree recurses down the tree seeking the correct place to add a new leaf. Each recursive call returns the root of the subtree on which it was called, after making any modifications needed to the subtree to perform the insertion. Deletion is implemented similarly.
Your job is to add the functionality needed to keep the tree balanced using the AVL property. In particular, you will need to
· augment the tree to maintain the height of each of its subtrees, as discussed in Studio;
· compute the balance at the root of a subtree (which is the height of the root's left subtree minus that of its right subtree);
· implement the AVL rebalancing operation, along with the supporting rotation operations; and
· call the height maintenance and rebalancing operations at the appropriate times during insertion and deletion.
Code Outline
There are two main source code files you need to consider, both in the avl package:
· TreeNode.java implements a class TreeNode that represents a node of a binary search tree. It holds a value (the key of the node) along with child and parent pointers. It has a height data member that is currently not used for anything. You should not modify this file, but you need to understand its contents.
· AVLTree.java implements an ordered set as a binary search tree made out of TreeNode objects.
The AVLTree class provides an interface that includes element insertion and deletion, as well as an exists() method that tests whether a value is present in the set. It also offers min() and max() methods. These methods all work as given for (unbalanced) BSTs, using the algorithms we discussed in lecture.
To implement the AVL balancing method, you will need to fill in some missing code to maintain the height of each subtree and perform rebalancing. Look for the 'FIXME' tags in AVLTree.java to see which methods you must modify.
Height Maintenance
You'll need to set the height data member each time a new leaf is allocated in the tree. You can then maintain the height as part of insertion or deletion using the incremental updating strategy you worked out in Studio 10, Part C.
The update procedure updateHeight() takes in a node and updates its height using the heights of its two subtrees. It should run in constant time.
You'll need to call updateHeight() wherever it is needed – in insertion, deletion, and perhaps elsewhere.
Rebalancing
You must implement four methods as part of AVL rebalancing:
· getBalance() computes the balance fact.
Codes of Ethics Guides Not Prescriptions A set of rules and di.docxmary772
Codes of Ethics: Guides Not Prescriptions A set of rules and directives that would result in efficient and ethical professional practice would be something clearly welcomed by student and professional alike. However, as should be clear by now, such prescriptions or recipes for professional practice do not exist, nor does every client and every professional condition provide clear-cut avenues for progress. Professional practice is both complex and complicated. The issues presented are often confounded and conflicting. The process of making sense of the options available and engaging in the path that leads to effective, ethical practice cannot be preprogrammed but rather needs to be fluid, flexible, and responsive to the uniqueness of the client and the context of helping. The very dynamic and fluid nature of our work with clients prohibits the use of rigid, formulaic prescriptions or directions. Never is this so obvious as when first confronted with an ethical dilemma. Consider the subtle challenges to practice decisions presented in Case Illustration 7.1. The case reflects a decision regarding the release of information and the potential breach of confidentiality. The element confounding the decision, as you will see, is that the client was deceased and it was the executrix of the estate providing permission to release the information to a third party.
Case Illustration 7.1 Conditions for Maintaining Confidentiality While all clinicians have been schooled in the issue of confidentiality and the various conditions under which confidentiality must be breached (e.g., prevention of harm to self or another), the conditions of maintenance of confidentiality can be somewhat blurred when the material under consideration is that of a client who is now deceased. Consider the case of Dr. Martin Orne, MD, PhD. Dr. Orne was a psychotherapist who worked with Anne Sexton, a Pulitzer Prize winner. Following the death of Ms. Sexton, an author, Ms. Middlebrook, set out to write her biography. In doing her research, Ms. Middlebrook discovered that Dr. Orne had tape-recorded a number of sessions with Ms. Sexton in order to allow her to review the sessions, and he had not destroyed the tapes following her death. Ms. Middlebrook approached Linda Gray Sexton, the daughter of the client and the executrix of the estate, seeking permission to access these tapes of the confidential therapy sessions as an aid to her writing. The daughter granted permission for release of the therapeutic tapes. A number of questions could be raised around this case, including the ethics of tape-recording or the ethics of maintenance of the tapes following the death of the client. However, the most pressing issue involves the conditions under which confidentiality should be maintained. The challenge here is, should Dr. Orne release the tapes in response to the daughter’s granting of permission, or does his client have the right to confidentiality even beyond the grave? As noted, t.
Codecademy Monetizing a Movement 815-093 815-093 Codecademy.docxmary772
Codecademy: Monetizing a Movement? 815-093
815-093 Codecademy: Monetizing a Movement?
Codecademy: Monetizing a Movement? 815-093
9-815-093
RE V : OCT OB E R 1 4 , 2 0 1 5
JEFFREY J. BU SSGANG
LISA C. MA ZZANTI
Codecademy: Monetizing a Movement?
We’re a movement to make education more of a commodity. We’re not just a for-profit company. Our mission would get tainted if we charged consumers for content. We need to be authentic.
— Zach Sims, Cofounder and CEO
Zach Sims and Ryan Bubinski sat in the Codecademy headquarters, an exposed-brick fourth-floor office near Madison Square Park in New York City. In 2011, while in their early twenties, the two had founded Codecademy, an open-platform, online community to teach users to code. By 2014, they had a total of 24 million unique users and a library of over 100,000 lessons. The company had raised a total of $12.5 million in funding and was, on many fronts, an overwhelming success. However, there were still no revenues. The company’s website stated, “Codecademy is free and always will be.”1
The founders, along with the board, had decided that 2014 would be a year of experimentation with different monetization strategies. By June, the cofounders had preliminarily tested two monetization models. The first charged companies for training employees offline on coding skills, a service that the training departments of these companies paid an annual fee to receive. The second monetization model focused on a labor marketplace to match Codecademy users with jobs that corporations and recruiters were seeking to fill.
But 2014 had also been busy in other arenas for the 25-employee company. In April, the company launched a redesign of its website, because, as the Codecademy blog announced, “it quickly became apparent that if we wanted to grow and mature as a brand, we required a thorough redesign of our entire product.”2 The next month, the company announced that they were opening an office in London to work with the British education system and also had forged partnerships with foundations and government bodies in Estonia, Argentina, and France.
As Sims and Bubinski huddled in their glass-walled conference room, they tried to focus on the task at hand—to narrow down their ideas and eventually decide on a viable business model. The two reviewed early results from both experiments to prepare for the upcoming board meeting where they planned to present their findings and propose next steps. The employee-training experiments had yielded promising initial results but would require hiring a sales force, offline instructors, and some content customization to scale. The labor marketplace model promised less friction in scaling but represented a more crowded market opportunity.
Senior Lecturer Jeffrey J. Bussgang and Case Researcher Lisa C. Mazzanti (Case Research & Writing Group) prepared this case. It was reviewed and approved before publication by a company designate. Funding for the develo.
Code switching involves using 1 language or nonstandard versions of .docxmary772
Code switching involves alternating between languages or language varieties based on context. The document asks for a 175+ word response about a personal experience with code switching, including why it was done and potential benefits and consequences, as well as the outcome.
Code of Ethics for the Nutrition and Dietetics Pr.docxmary772
This document presents the Code of Ethics for the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession, which establishes the principles and ethical standards that guide nutrition and dietetics practitioners. It contains 4 main principles: competence, integrity, professionalism, and social responsibility. The code applies general ethical guidelines and standards for common practice situations to protect clients, patients, and the public. It also requires practitioners to abide by the code and report any perceived violations.
Code of Ethics for Engineers 4. Engineers shall act .docxmary772
Code of Ethics for Engineers
4. Engineers shall act for each employer or client as faithful agents or
trustees.
a. Engineers shall disclose all known or potential conflicts of interest
that could influence or appear to influence their judgment or the
quality of their services.
b. Engineers shall not accept compensation, financial or otherwise,
from more than one party for services on the same project, or for
services pertaining to the same project, unless the circumstances are
fully disclosed and agreed to by all interested parties.
c. Engineers shall not solicit or accept financial or other valuable
consideration, directly or indirectly, from outside agents in
connection with the work for which they are responsible.
d. Engineers in public service as members, advisors, or employees
of a governmental or quasi-governmental body or department shall
not participate in decisions with respect to services solicited or
provided by them or their organizations in private or public
engineering practice.
e. Engineers shall not solicit or accept a contract from a governmental
body on which a principal or officer of their organization serves as
a member.
5. Engineers shall avoid deceptive acts.
a. Engineers shall not falsify their qualifications or permit
misrepresentation of their or their associates’ qualifications. They
shall not misrepresent or exaggerate their responsibility in or for the
subject matter of prior assignments. Brochures or other
presentations incident to the solicitation of employment shall not
misrepresent pertinent facts concerning employers, employees,
associates, joint venturers, or past accomplishments.
b. Engineers shall not offer, give, solicit, or receive, either directly or
indirectly, any contribution to influence the award of a contract by
public authority, or which may be reasonably construed by the
public as having the effect or intent of influencing the awarding of a
contract. They shall not offer any gift or other valuable
consideration in order to secure work. They shall not pay a
commission, percentage, or brokerage fee in order to secure work,
except to a bona fide employee or bona fide established commercial
or marketing agencies retained by them.
III. Professional Obligations
1. Engineers shall be guided in all their relations by the highest standards
of honesty and integrity.
a. Engineers shall acknowledge their errors and shall not distort or
alter the facts.
b. Engineers shall advise their clients or employers when they believe
a project will not be successful.
c. Engineers shall not accept outside employment to the detriment of
their regular work or interest. Before accepting any outside
engineering employment, they will notify their employers.
d. Engineers shall not attempt to attract an engineer from another
employer by false or misleading pretenses.
e. Engineers shall not promote their own interest at the expense of the
dignity and integr.
Coder Name: Rebecca Oquendo
Coding Categories:
Episode
Aggressive Behavior
Neutral Behavior
Virtuous Behavior
Aggressive Gaming
Neutral Gaming
Virtuous Gaming
An older peer began using slurs or derogatory language
An older peer suggested that the team should cheat
The child witnessed an older peer intentionally leave out another player
An older player suggested that they play a different game
The child lost the game with older players on their team
The child witnessed an older player curse every time a mistake was made
Index:
· In this case aggressive behavior would constitute as mimicking older members undesired behaviors or becoming especially angry or agitated in game. A neutral behavior would be playing as they usually would not mimicking older player’s behaviors or trying to fit in to their more aggressive styles. A virtuous behavior would be steering the game away from aggression, voicing an opinion about the excessive aggression, or finding a way to express their gaming experience in a positive way. The same can be applied for the similar categories in “gaming”.
· Each category can be scaled from 1-7 in which way the child’s dialogue tended to be behavior and gaming wise with a 1 indicating little to no effort in that direction and a 7 indicating extreme effort in that category.
1. What are the different types of attributes? Provide examples of each attribute.
2. Describe the components of a decision tree. Give an example problem and provide an example of each component in your decision making tree
3. Conduct research over the Internet and find an article on data mining. The article has to be less than 5 years old. Summarize the article in your own words. Make sure that you use APA formatting for this assignment.
Questions from attached files
1. Obtain one of the data sets available at the UCI Machine Learning Repository and apply as many of the different visualization techniques described in the chapter as possible. The bibliographic notes and book Web site provide pointers to visualization software.
2. Identify at least two advantages and two disadvantages of using color to visually represent information.
3. What are the arrangement issues that arise with respect to three-dimensional plots?
4. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using sampling to reduce the number of data objects that need to be displayed. Would simple random sampling (without replacement) be a good approach to sampling? Why or why not?
5. Describe how you would create visualizations to display information that describes the following types of systems.
a) Computer networks. Be sure to include both the static aspects of the network, such as connectivity, and the dynamic aspects, such as traffic.
b) The distribution of specific plant and animal species around the world fora specific moment in time.
c) The use of computer resources, such as processor time, main me.
Codes of Ethical Conduct A Bottom-Up ApproachRonald Paul .docxmary772
Codes of Ethical Conduct: A Bottom-Up Approach
Ronald Paul Hill • Justine M. Rapp
Received: 18 January 2013 / Accepted: 12 December 2013 / Published online: 1 January 2014
� Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
Abstract Developing and implementing a meaningful
code of conduct by managers or consultants may require a
change in orientation that modifies the way these precepts
are determined. The position advocated herein is for a
different approach to understanding and organizing the
guiding parameters of the firm that requires individual
reflection and empowerment of the entire organization to
advance their shared values. The processes involved are
discussed using four discrete stages that move from the
personal to the work team and to the unit to the full
company, followed by the board of directors’ evaluation.
The hoped-for end product is dynamic, employee-driven,
codes of conduct that recognize the systemic and far-
reaching impact of organizational activities across internal
and external stakeholders. Operational details for and some
issues associated with its implementation are also provided.
Keywords Code of conduct � Employee-driven
approaches � Bottom-up development
Corporation, Be Good! Frederick (2006)
That managers and employees are capable of both ethical
and unethical behaviors due to individual and internal
corporate culture factors cannot be denied (Ashforth and
Anand 2003; Treviño and Weaver 2003; Treviño et al.
2006). Over the last decade, as diverse organizational
stakeholders began exerting more pressure on firms to
eliminate unethical conduct, the field of management has
witnessed a proliferation of research on ethics and ethical
behavior in organizations (Elango et al. 2010; Gopala-
krishnan et al. 2008; O’Fallon and Butterfield 2005; Tre-
viño et al. 2006).
However, recent ethical failures, as well as continuous
ethical challenges that organizations face, have led scholars
to conclude that predicting ethical dilemmas is difficult a
priori: ‘‘It is only, when we look back on our conduct over
the long run that we may find ourselves guilty of moral
laxity’’ (Geva 2006, p. 138). What underlies this particular
situation is the inability of organizational elites to monitor
and implement initiatives within today’s complex business
entities (Martin and Eisenhardt 2010; Uhl-Bien et al.
2007). Accordingly, more dynamic approaches to business
ethics is needed, one that spans ‘‘both the individual and
organizational levels’’ of concern (Gopalakrishnan et al.
2008, p. 757).
As a consequence and in reaction to neoclassical eco-
nomics, managers and their employees are expected to go
beyond dictates imposed by the law and marketplace to
fulfill larger responsibilities (Stark 1993). This expectation
is accomplished through adoption of a stakeholder per-
spective that is infused with empathy for people, groups,
and communities that may be impacted by the actions of
business.
Code#RE00200012002020MN2DGHEType of Service.docxmary772
Code#RE00200012002020MN2DGHE
*****************
Type of Service
Presentation task- Attack Vector
Solution
s Step 14: Submit the Presentation
Project Title/Subject
Attack Vector
.
CODE OF ETHICSReview the following case study and address the qu.docxmary772
CODE OF ETHICS
Review the following case study and address the questions that follow:
General Hospital’s staff aggregated its infection rate data for comparison purposes with four other hospitals in the community. The staff members were aware that the data was flawed. They presented a false perception that General Hospital’s postoperative infection rates were lower than those of peer hospitals. The comparison data was published in the local newspaper. The Jones family, believing the data to be correct and concerned about the number of deaths related to hospital-acquired infections, relied on the data in selecting General Hospital as their preferred hospital.
Tasks:
Describe how organizational and professional codes of ethics were violated in this case.
Describe what role an organization’s ethics committee could play in addressing this or similar issues.
400 words APA format
.
cocaine, conspiracy theories and the cia in central america by Craig.docxmary772
cocaine, conspiracy theories and the cia in central america by Craig Delaval
Delaval is a freelance writer and filmmaker and was a production assistant for "Drug Wars." This article was edited by Lowell Bergman, series reporter for "Drug Wars."
Since its creation in 1947 under President Harry Truman, the CIA has been credited with a number of far-fetched operations. While some were proven - the infamous LSD mind-control experiments of the 1950s - others, like the assassination of John F. Kennedy and the crash of the Savings and Loans industry, have little or no merit.
In 1996 the agency was accused of being a crack dealer.
A series of expose articles in the San Jose Mercury-News by reporter Gary Webb told tales of a drug triangle during the 1980s that linked CIA officials in Central America, a San Francisco drug ring and a Los Angeles drug dealer. According to the stories, the CIA and its operatives used crack cocaine--sold via the Los Angeles African-American community--to raise millions to support the agency's clandestine operations in Central America.
The CIA's suspect past made the sensational articles an easy sell. Talk radio switchboards lit up, as did African-American leaders like U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Los Angeles, who pointed to Webb's articles as proof of a mastermind plot to destroy inner-city black America.
One of the people who was accused in the San Jose Mercury-News of being in the midst of the CIA cocaine conspiracy is one of the most respected, now retired, veteran D.E.A. agents, Robert "Bobby" Nieves.
"You have to understand Central America at that time was a haven for the conspiracy theorists. Christic Institute, people like Gary Webb, others down there, looking to dig up some story for political advantage," Nieves said. "No sexier story than to create the notion in people's minds that these people are drug traffickers."
But in the weeks following publication, Webb's peers doubted the merit of the articles. Fellow journalists at the Washington Post, New York Times and Webb's own editor accused him of blowing a few truths up into a massive conspiracy.
Amongst Webb's fundamental problems was his implication that the CIA lit the crack cocaine fuse. It was conspiracy theory: a neat presentation of reality that simply didn't jibe with real life. Webb later agreed in an interview that there is no hard evidence that the CIA as an institution or any of its agent-employees carried out or profited from drug trafficking.
Still, the fantastic story of the CIA injecting crack into ghettos had taken hold. In response to the public outcry following Webb's allegations--which were ultimately published in book form under the title Dark Alliance--the CIA conducted an internal investigation of its role in Central America related to the drug trade. Frederick Hitz, as the CIA Inspector General-- an independent watchdog approved by Congress--conducted the investigation. In October 1998, the CIA released a declassifie.
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Code Expenses $ including grants of $ Revenue $Code .docx
1. Code: Expenses $ including grants of $ Revenue $
Code: Expenses $ including grants of $ Revenue $
Code: Expenses $ including grants of $ Revenue $
Expenses $ including grants of $ Revenue $
732002 11-28-17
1
2
3
4
Yes No
Yes No
4a
4b
4c
4d
2. 4e
Form 990 (2017) Page
Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in
this Part III ����������������������������
Briefly describe the organization's mission:
Did the organization undertake any significant program services
during the year which were not listed on the
prior Form 990 or 990-EZ?
If "Yes," describe these new services on Schedule O.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization cease conducting, or make significant
changes in how it conducts, any program services?
If "Yes," describe these changes on Schedule O.
~~~~~~
Describe the organization's program service accomplishments
for each of its three largest program services, as measured by
expenses.
Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations are required to
report the amount of grants and allocations to others, the total
expenses, and
revenue, if any, for each program service reported.
3. ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
Other program services (Describe in Schedule O.)
( ) ( )
Total program service expenses |
Form (2017)
2
Statement of Program Service AccomplishmentsPart III
990
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
X
SERVING PASTORS, TRAINING LEADERS, DISCIPLING
MEN. OUR LONG-TERM GOAL
IS THAT, WITH GOD'S HELP, 10 MILLION MEN WILL
LEAD POWERFUL LIVES
TRANSFORMED BY CHRIST BY 2020.
X
X
4. 2,246,446.
LEADERSHIP COMMUNITY: MAN IN THE MIRROR HELPS
CHURCHES DISCIPLE MEN
THROUGH THE JOURNEY TO BIBLICAL MANHOOD, A
FLEXIBLE PROCESS THAT
COMBINES THE PRINCIPLES OF NO MAN LEFT BEHIND,
CHURCH EVENTS, SMALL
GROUP CURRICULA, BIBLE STUDY, AND MORE. THE
JOURNEY PROVIDES CHURCHES
WITH 12 CHALLENGES TO DISCIPLE MEN IN THE MAJOR
AREAS OF THE CHRISTIAN
LIFE--ALL OF WHICH ARE FULLY CUSTOMIZABLE WITH
TEMPLATES AND TIMELINES.
MAN IN THE MIRROR AREA DIRECTORS LINK ARMS
WITH PASTORS AND LEADERS IN
THEIR AREA OF THE COUNTRY TO HELP THEM BE AS
EFFECTIVE AS POSSIBLE IN
REACHING MEN. LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE
COUNTRY, THEY SERVE AS LOCAL MEN'S
DISCIPLESHIP EXPERTS TO ANY CHURCH THAT WANTS
HELP. THEY ALSO
COORDINATE A LOCAL COALITION FOR MEN'S
DISCIPLESHIP, MADE UP OF
CHURCHES AND LEADERS COMMITTED TO THE CAUSE.
116,854.
RESOURCE MINISTRY (RESOURCES AND BOOKS) - MAN
IN THE MIRROR ALSO
PROVIDES BOOKS FOR PURCHASE AT UP TO 85% OFF OF
THE COVER PRICE THROUGH
OUR BOOKS BY THE BOX PROGRAM. THROUGH THIS
PROGRAM, WE PARTNER WITH
LOCAL LEADERS WHO PURCHASE THE BOOKS AT THESE
GRATUITOUS DISCOUNTS AND
THEN GIVE THEM AWAY TO FRIENDS, NEIGHBORS AND
5. FELLOW PARISHIONERS FOR
FREE. APPROXIMATELY 94,000 BOOKS WERE
DISTRIBUTED IN THIS FASHION IN
2016 ALONE.
188,635. 53,242.
LEADERSHIP TRAINING CENTER - MAN IN THE MIRROR
TRAINS LEADERSHIP TEAMS
WITH A PROVEN STRATEGY FOR DISCIPLING EVERY
MAN IN THE CHURCH, THE NO
MAN LEFT BEHIND MODEL. THE MODEL HELPS
LEADERS CAST VISION, ASSESS THE
SPIRITUAL STATE OF THEIR MEN, AND DEVELOP AN
INTENTIONAL PLAN TO
DISCIPLE ALL THEIR MEN OVER THE LONG TERM.
306,918. 79,297.
2,858,853.
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
3
732003 11-28-17
Yes No
1
2
3
9. If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part I
If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part II
If "Yes," complete Schedule C, Part III
If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part I
If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part II
If "Yes," complete
Schedule D, Part III
If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part IV
If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part V
If "Yes," complete Schedule D,
Part VI
If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part VII
If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part VIII
If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part IX
If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part X
If "Yes," complete Schedule D, Part X
If "Yes," complete
Schedule D, Parts XI and XII
If "Yes," and if the organization answered "No" to line 12a,
then completing Schedule D, Parts XI and XII is optional
If "Yes," complete Schedule E
10. If "Yes," complete Schedule F, Parts I and IV
If "Yes," complete Schedule F, Parts II and IV
If "Yes," complete Schedule F, Parts III and IV
If "Yes," complete Schedule G, Part I
If "Yes," complete Schedule G, Part II
If "Yes,"
complete Schedule G, Part III
Form 990 (2017) Page
Is the organization described in section 501(c)(3) or 4947(a)(1)
(other than a private foundation)?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is the organization required to complete ?
Did the organization engage in direct or indirect political
campaign activities on behalf of or in opposition to candidates
for
public office?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization engage in lobbying activities, or have a
section 501(h) election in effect
11. during the tax year?
Is the organization a section 501(c)(4), 501(c)(5), or 501(c)(6)
organization that receives membership dues, assessments, or
similar amounts as defined in Revenue Procedure 98-19?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization maintain any donor advised funds or any
similar funds or accounts for which donors have the right to
provide advice on the distribution or investment of amounts in
such funds or accounts?
Did the organization receive or hold a conservation easement,
including easements to preserve open space,
the environment, historic land areas, or historic structures?
Did the organization maintain collections of works of art,
historical treasures, or other similar assets?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~
Did the organization report an amount in Part X, line 21, for
escrow or custodial account liability, serve as a custodian for
amounts not listed in Part X; or provide credit counseling, debt
management, credit repair, or debt negotiation services?
12. Did the organization, directly or through a related organization,
hold assets in temporarily restricted endowments, permanent
endowments, or quasi-endowments?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If the organization's answer to any of the following questions is
"Yes," then complete Schedule D, Parts VI, VII, VIII, IX, or X
as applicable.
Did the organization report an amount for land, buildings, and
equipment in Part X, line 10?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization report an amount for investments - other
securities in Part X, line 12 that is 5% or more of its total
assets reported in Part X, line 16?
Did the organization report an amount for investments -
program related in Part X, line 13 that is 5% or more of its total
assets reported in Part X, line 16?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization report an amount for other assets in Part X,
line 15 that is 5% or more of its total assets reported in
13. Part X, line 16?
Did the organization report an amount for other liabilities in
Part X, line 25?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Did the organization's separate or consolidated financial
statements for the tax year include a footnote that addresses
the organization's liability for uncertain tax positions under FIN
48 (ASC 740)?
Did the organization obtain separate, independent audited
financial statements for the tax year?
~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Was the organization included in consolidated, independent
audited financial statements for the tax year?
~~~~~
Is the organization a school described in section
170(b)(1)(A)(ii)?
Did the organization maintain an office, employees, or agents
outside of the United States?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
14. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization have aggregate revenues or expenses of
more than $10,000 from grantmaking, fundraising, business,
investment, and program service activities outside the United
States, or aggregate foreign investments valued at $100,000
or more? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization report on Part IX, column (A), line 3, more
than $5,000 of grants or other assistance to or for any
foreign organization?
Did the organization report on Part IX, column (A), line 3, more
than $5,000 of aggregate grants or other assistance to
or for foreign individuals?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization report a total of more than $15,000 of
expenses for professional fundraising services on Part IX,
column (A), lines 6 and 11e?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization report more than $15,000 total of
fundraising event gross income and contributions on Part VIII,
lines
1c and 8a? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
15. Did the organization report more than $15,000 of gross income
from gaming activities on Part VIII, line 9a?
�����������������������������������
������������
Form (2017)
3
Part IV Checklist of Required Schedules
990
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
20. b
Section 501(c)(3), 501(c)(4), and 501(c)(29) organizations.
a
b
c
a
b
Section 501(c)(3) organizations.
Note.
(continued)
If "Yes," complete Schedule H
If "Yes," complete Schedule I, Parts I and II
If "Yes," complete Schedule I, Parts I and III
If "Yes," complete
Schedule J
If "Yes," answer lines 24b through 24d and complete
Schedule K. If "No", go to line 25a
If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part I
If "Yes," complete
Schedule L, Part I
21. If "Yes,"
complete Schedule L, Part II
If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part III
If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part IV
If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part IV
If "Yes," complete Schedule L, Part IV
If "Yes," complete Schedule M
If "Yes," complete Schedule M
If "Yes," complete Schedule N, Part I
If "Yes," complete
Schedule N, Part II
If "Yes," complete Schedule R, Part I
If "Yes," complete Schedule R, Part II, III, or IV, and
Part V, line 1
If "Yes," complete Schedule R, Part V, line 2
If "Yes," complete Schedule R, Part V, line 2
If "Yes," complete Schedule R, Part VI
Form 990 (2017) Page
Did the organization operate one or more hospital facilities?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If "Yes" to line 20a, did the organization attach a copy of its
22. audited financial statements to this return? ~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization report more than $5,000 of grants or other
assistance to any domestic organization or
domestic government on Part IX, column (A), line 1?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization report more than $5,000 of grants or other
assistance to or for domestic individuals on
Part IX, column (A), line 2? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization answer "Yes" to Part VII, Section A, line
3, 4, or 5 about compensation of the organization's current
and former officers, directors, trustees, key employees, and
highest compensated employees?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~
Did the organization have a tax-exempt bond issue with an
outstanding principal amount of more than $100,000 as of the
last day of the year, that was issued after December 31, 2002?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization invest any proceeds of tax-exempt bonds
beyond a temporary period exception?
Did the organization maintain an escrow account other than a
refunding escrow at any time during the year to defease
any tax-exempt bonds?
23. Did the organization act as an "on behalf of" issuer for bonds
outstanding at any time during the year?
~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization engage in an excess benefit
transaction with a disqualified person during the year?
Is the organization aware that it engaged in an excess benefit
transaction with a disqualified person in a prior year, and
that the transaction has not been reported on any of the
organization's prior Forms 990 or 990-EZ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~
Did the organization report any amount on Part X, line 5, 6, or
22 for receivables from or payables to any current or
former officers, directors, trustees, key employees, highest
compensated employees, or disqualified persons?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization provide a grant or other assistance to an
officer, director, trustee, key employee, substantial
24. contributor or employee thereof, a grant selection committee
member, or to a 35% controlled entity or family member
of any of these persons? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Was the organization a party to a business transaction with one
of the following parties (see Schedule L, Part IV
instructions for applicable filing thresholds, conditions, and
exceptions):
A current or former officer, director, trustee, or key employee?
~~~~~~~~~~~
A family member of a current or former officer, director,
trustee, or key employee?
An entity of which a current or former officer, director, trustee,
or key employee (or a family member thereof) was an officer,
director, trustee, or direct or indirect owner?
~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization receive more than $25,000 in non-cash
contributions?
Did the organization receive contributions of art, historical
treasures, or other similar assets, or qualified conservation
contributions?
~~~~~~~~~
25. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization liquidate, terminate, or dissolve and cease
operations?
Did the organization sell, exchange, dispose of, or transfer more
than 25% of its net assets?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~
Did the organization own 100% of an entity disregarded as
separate from the organization under Regulations
sections 301.7701-2 and 301.7701-3?
Was the organization related to any tax-exempt or taxable
entity?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Did the organization have a controlled entity within the
meaning of section 512(b)(13)?
If "Yes" to line 35a, did the organization receive any payment
from or engage in any transaction with a controlled entity
within the meaning of section 512(b)(13)?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
26. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization make any transfers to an exempt non-
charitable related organization?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization conduct more than 5% of its activities
through an entity that is not a related organization
and that is treated as a partnership for federal income tax
purposes? ~~~~~~~~
Did the organization complete Schedule O and provide
explanations in Schedule O for Part VI, lines 11b and 19?
All Form 990 filers are required to complete Schedule O
�������������������������������
Form (2017)
4
Part IV Checklist of Required Schedules
990
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
X
X
X
X
33. a
b
13a
13b
13c
14a
14b
e-file
If "No," to line 3b, provide an explanation in Schedule O
If "No," provide an explanation in Schedule O
Did the organization receive a payment in excess of $75 made
partly as a contribution and partly for goods and services
provided to the payor?
Form (2017)
Form 990 (2017) Page
Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in
this Part V ���������������������������
Enter the number reported in Box 3 of Form 1096. Enter -0- if
not applicable ~~~~~~~~~~~
Enter the number of Forms W-2G included in line 1a. Enter -0-
if not applicable ~~~~~~~~~~
34. Did the organization comply with backup withholding rules for
reportable payments to vendors and reportable gaming
(gambling) winnings to prize winners?
�����������������������������������
��������
Enter the number of employees reported on Form W-3,
Transmittal of Wage and Tax Statements,
filed for the calendar year ending with or within the year
covered by this return ~~~~~~~~~~
If at least one is reported on line 2a, did the organization file all
required federal employment tax returns?
If the sum of lines 1a and 2a is greater than 250, you may be
required to (see instructions)
~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization have unrelated business gross income of
$1,000 or more during the year?
If "Yes," has it filed a Form 990-T for this year?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~
At any time during the calendar year, did the organization have
an interest in, or a signature or other authority over, a
35. financial account in a foreign country (such as a bank account,
securities account, or other financial account)? ~~~~~~~
If "Yes," enter the name of the foreign country:
See instructions for filing requirements for FinCEN Form 114,
Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR).
Was the organization a party to a prohibited tax shelter
transaction at any time during the tax year?
Did any taxable party notify the organization that it was or is a
party to a prohibited tax shelter transaction?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~
If "Yes," to line 5a or 5b, did the organization file Form 8886-
T? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Does the organization have annual gross receipts that are
normally greater than $100,000, and did the organization solicit
any contributions that were not tax deductible as charitable
contributions?
If "Yes," did the organization include with every solicitation an
express statement that such contributions or gifts
were not tax deductible?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
36. If "Yes," did the organization notify the donor of the value of
the goods or services provided?
Did the organization sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of
tangible personal property for which it was required
to file Form 8282?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
�����������������������������������
�����������������
If "Yes," indicate the number of Forms 8282 filed during the
year
Did the organization receive any funds, directly or indirectly, to
pay premiums on a personal benefit contract?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~Did the organization, during the year, pay
premiums, directly or indirectly, on a personal benefit contract?
If the organization received a contribution of qualified
intellectual property, did the organization file Form 8899 as
required?
If the organization received a contribution of cars, boats,
airplanes, or other vehicles, did the organization file a Form
1098-C?
~
37. Did a donor advised fund maintained by the
sponsoring organization have excess business holdings at any
time during the year? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the sponsoring organization make any taxable distributions
under section 4966?
Did the sponsoring organization make a distribution to a donor,
donor advisor, or related person?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Enter:
Initiation fees and capital contributions included on Part VIII,
line 12
Gross receipts, included on Form 990, Part VIII, line 12, for
public use of club facilities
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Enter:
Gross income from members or shareholders
Gross income from other sources (Do not net amounts due or
paid to other sources against
amounts due or received from them.)
38. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is the organization filing Form 990 in lieu of Form 1041?
If "Yes," enter the amount of tax-exempt interest received or
accrued during the year ������
Is the organization licensed to issue qualified health plans in
more than one state?
See the instructions for additional information the organization
must report on Schedule O.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Enter the amount of reserves the organization is required to
maintain by the states in which the
organization is licensed to issue qualified health plans
Enter the amount of reserves on hand
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization receive any payments for indoor tanning
services during the tax year?
If "Yes," has it filed a Form 720 to report these payments?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
����������
39. 5
Part V Statements Regarding Other IRS Filings and Tax
Compliance
990
J
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
X
10
0
62
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
40. 13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
6
732006 11-28-17
Yes No
1a
1b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
a
b
43. 13
14
15
a
b
16a
b
17
18
19
20
For each "Yes" response to lines 2 through 7b below, and for a
"No" response
to line 8a, 8b, or 10b below, describe the circumstances,
processes, or changes in Schedule O. See instructions.
If "Yes," provide the names and addresses in Schedule O
(This Section B requests information about policies not required
by the Internal Revenue Code.)
If "No," go to line 13
If "Yes," describe
in Schedule O how this was done
44. (explain in Schedule O)
If there are material differences in voting rights among
members of the governing body, or if the governing
body delegated broad authority to an executive committee or
similar committee, explain in Schedule O.
Did the organization contemporaneously document the meetings
held or written actions undertaken during the year by the
following:
Were officers, directors, or trustees, and key employees
required to disclose annually interests that could give rise to
conflicts?
Form (2017)
Form 990 (2017) Page
Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in
this Part VI ���������������������������
Enter the number of voting members of the governing body at
the end of the tax year
Enter the number of voting members included in line 1a, above,
who are independent
~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Did any officer, director, trustee, or key employee have a family
relationship or a business relationship with any other
45. officer, director, trustee, or key employee?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization delegate control over management duties
customarily performed by or under the direct supervision
of officers, directors, or trustees, or key employees to a
management company or other person? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization make any significant changes to its
governing documents since the prior Form 990 was filed?
Did the organization become aware during the year of a
significant diversion of the organization's assets?
Did the organization have members or stockholders?
~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization have members, stockholders, or other
persons who had the power to elect or appoint one or
more members of the governing body?
Are any governance decisions of the organization reserved to
(or subject to approval by) members, stockholders, or
persons other than the governing body?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
46. The governing body?
Each committee with authority to act on behalf of the governing
body?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is there any officer, director, trustee, or key employee listed in
Part VII, Section A, who cannot be reached at the
organization's mailing address? �����������������
Did the organization have local chapters, branches, or
affiliates?
If "Yes," did the organization have written policies and
procedures governing the activities of such chapters, affiliates,
and branches to ensure their operations are consistent with the
organization's exempt purposes?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Has the organization provided a complete copy of this Form 990
to all members of its governing body before filing the form?
Describe in Schedule O the process, if any, used by the
organization to review this Form 990.
Did the organization have a written conflict of interest policy?
47. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Did the organization regularly and consistently monitor and
enforce compliance with the policy?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization have a written whistleblower policy?
Did the organization have a written document retention and
destruction policy?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the process for determining compensation of the following
persons include a review and approval by independent
persons, comparability data, and contemporaneous
substantiation of the deliberation and decision?
The organization's CEO, Executive Director, or top management
official
Other officers or key employees of the organization
If "Yes" to line 15a or 15b, describe the process in Schedule O
(see instructions).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
48. Did the organization invest in, contribute assets to, or
participate in a joint venture or similar arrangement with a
taxable entity during the year?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If "Yes," did the organization follow a written policy or
procedure requiring the organization to evaluate its
participation
in joint venture arrangements under applicable federal tax law,
and take steps to safeguard the organization's
exempt status with respect to such arrangements?
�����������������������������������
�
List the states with which a copy of this Form 990 is required to
be filed
Section 6104 requires an organization to make its Forms 1023
(or 1024 if applicable), 990, and 990-T (Section 501(c)(3)s
only) available
for public inspection. Indicate how you made these available.
Check all that apply.
Own website Another's website Upon request Other
Describe in Schedule O whether (and if so, how) the
organization made its governing documents, conflict of interest
policy, and financial
statements available to the public during the tax year.
State the name, address, and telephone number of the person
49. who possesses the organization's books and records: |
6
Part VI Governance, Management, and Disclosure
Section A. Governing Body and Management
Section B. Policies
Section C. Disclosure
990
J
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
X
7
7
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
53. Fo
rm
er
(do not check more than one
box, unless person is both an
officer and a director/trustee)
732007 11-28-17
current
Section A. Officers, Directors, Trustees, Key Employees, and
Highest Compensated Employees
1a
current
current
former
former directors or trustees
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)
Form 990 (2017) Page
Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in
this Part VII ���������������������������
54. Complete this table for all persons required to be listed. Report
compensation for the calendar year ending with or within the
organization's tax year.
¥ List all of the organization's officers, directors, trustees
(whether individuals or organizations), regardless of amount of
compensation.
Enter -0- in columns (D), (E), and (F) if no compensation was
paid.
¥ List all of the organization's key employees, if any. See
instructions for definition of "key employee."
¥ List the organization's five highest compensated employees
(other than an officer, director, trustee, or key employee) who
received report-
able compensation (Box 5 of Form W-2 and/or Box 7 of Form
1099-MISC) of more than $100,000 from the organization and
any related organizations.
¥ List all of the organization's officers, key employees, and
highest compensated employees who received more than
$100,000 of
reportable compensation from the organization and any related
organizations.
¥ List all of the organization's that received, in the capacity as a
former director or trustee of the organization,
more than $10,000 of reportable compensation from the
organization and any related organizations.
List persons in the following order: individual trustees or
directors; institutional trustees; officers; key employees; highest
compensated employees;
and former such persons.
55. Check this box if neither the organization nor any related
organization compensated any current officer, director, or
trustee.
PositionName and Title Average
hours per
week
(list any
hours for
related
organizations
below
line)
Reportable
compensation
from
the
organization
(W-2/1099-MISC)
Reportable
compensation
from related
organizations
(W-2/1099-MISC)
Estimated
amount of
56. other
compensation
from the
organization
and related
organizations
Form (2017)
7
Part VII Compensation of Officers, Directors, Trustees, Key
Employees, Highest Compensated
Employees, and Independent Contractors
990
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
(1) WILLIAM HELMS 2.00
DIRECTOR X 0. 0. 0.
(2) FRANK CAWTHON 2.00
DIRECTOR X 0. 0. 0.
(3) TODD WOODARD 2.00
DIRECTOR X 0. 0. 0.
(4) PATRICK M. MORLEY 25.00
EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN X X 66,569. 0. 654.
(5) DAVID DELK 2.00
DIRECTOR X 0. 0. 0.
(6) FRED MATEER 2.00
DIRECTOR X 0. 0. 0.
(7) DRU DALTON 2.00
57. DIRECTOR X 0. 0. 0.
(8) SCOTT MCCURDY 2.00
DIRECTOR X 0. 0. 0.
(9) BRETT CLEMMER 40.00
PRESIDENT & CEO X 108,408. 0. 28,531.
(10) SHARON CAREY 40.00
SECRETARY & TREASURER X 84,787. 0. 4,408.
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
8
Fo
rm
er
In
di
vi
du
al
tr
us
te
e
or
d
ire
59. at
ed
em
pl
oy
ee
K
ey
e
m
pl
oy
ee
(do not check more than one
box, unless person is both an
officer and a director/trustee)
732008 11-28-17
Section A. Officers, Directors, Trustees, Key Employees, and
Highest Compensated Employees
(B) (C)(A) (D) (E) (F)
1 b
c
60. d
Sub-total
Total from continuation sheets to Part VII, Section A
Total (add lines 1b and 1c)
2
Yes No
3
4
5
former
3
4
5
Section B. Independent Contractors
1
(A) (B) (C)
2
(continued)
61. If "Yes," complete Schedule J for such individual
If "Yes," complete Schedule J for such individual
If "Yes," complete Schedule J for such person
Page Form 990 (2017)
PositionAverage
hours per
week
(list any
hours for
related
organizations
below
line)
Name and title Reportable
compensation
from
the
organization
(W-2/1099-MISC)
Reportable
compensation
from related
organizations
(W-2/1099-MISC)
62. Estimated
amount of
other
compensation
from the
organization
and related
organizations
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
~~~~~~~~~~ |
������������������������ |
Total number of individuals (including but not limited to those
listed above) who received more than $100,000 of reportable
compensation from the organization |
Did the organization list any officer, director, or trustee, key
employee, or highest compensated employee on
line 1a? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For any individual listed on line 1a, is the sum of reportable
compensation and other compensation from the organization
and related organizations greater than $150,000?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did any person listed on line 1a receive or accrue compensation
63. from any unrelated organization or individual for services
rendered to the organization?
������������������������
Complete this table for your five highest compensated
independent contractors that received more than $100,000 of
compensation from
the organization. Report compensation for the calendar year
ending with or within the organization's tax year.
Name and business address Description of services
Compensation
Total number of independent contractors (including but not
limited to those listed above) who received more than
$100,000 of compensation from the organization |
Form (2017)
8
Part VII
990
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
259,764. 0. 33,593.
0. 0. 0.
259,764. 0. 33,593.
1
64. X
X
X
NONE
0
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
9
Noncash contributions included in lines 1a-1f: $
732009 11-28-17
Total revenue.
(A) (B) (C) (D)
1 a
b
c
d
e
f
71. e
12
Revenue excluded
from tax under
sections
512 - 514
All other contributions, gifts, grants, and
similar amounts not included above
See instructions.
Form (2017)
Page Form 990 (2017)
Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in
this Part VIII �������������������������
Total revenue Related or
exempt function
revenue
Unrelated
business
revenue
Federated campaigns
Membership dues
72. ~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~
Fundraising events
Related organizations
~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~
Government grants (contributions)
~~
Add lines 1a-1f ����������������� |
All other program service revenue ~~~~~
Add lines 2a-2f ����������������� |
Investment income (including dividends, interest, and
other similar amounts)
Income from investment of tax-exempt bond proceeds
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
Royalties ����������������������� |
(i) Real (ii) Personal
73. Gross rents
Less: rental expenses
Rental income or (loss)
Net rental income or (loss)
~~~~~~~
~~~
~~
�������������� |
Gross amount from sales of
assets other than inventory
(i) Securities (ii) Other
Less: cost or other basis
and sales expenses
Gain or (loss)
~~~
~~~~~~~
Net gain or (loss) ������������������� |
Gross income from fundraising events (not
74. including $ of
contributions reported on line 1c). See
Part IV, line 18 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Less: direct expenses~~~~~~~~~~
Net income or (loss) from fundraising events ����� |
Gross income from gaming activities. See
Part IV, line 19 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Less: direct expenses
Net income or (loss) from gaming activities
~~~~~~~~~
������ |
Gross sales of inventory, less returns
and allowances ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Less: cost of goods sold
Net income or (loss) from sales of inventory
~~~~~~~~
������ |
Miscellaneous Revenue
75. All other revenue ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Add lines 11a-11d ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
|�������������
9
Part VIII Statement of Revenue
990
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
3,298,930.
3,298,930.
SEMINARS & SPEAKING FE 900099 71,602. 71,602.
TUITION FEES 900099 53,242. 53,242.
REIMBURSEMENTS & OTHER 900099 7,695. 7,695.
132,539.
1,891. 1,891.
4,281.
3,565.
716.
716. 716.
171,554.
210,815.
-39,261. -39,261.
76. 3,394,815. 93,278. 0. 2,607.
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
10
Check here if following SOP 98-2 (ASC 958-720)
732010 11-28-17
Total functional expenses.
Joint costs.
(A) (B) (C) (D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
78. 20
21
22
23
24
a
b
c
d
e
25
26
Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations must complete all
columns. All other organizations must complete column (A).
Grants and other assistance to domestic organizations
and domestic governments. See Part IV, line 21
Compensation not included above, to disqualified
persons (as defined under section 4958(f)(1)) and
persons described in section 4958(c)(3)(B)
79. Pension plan accruals and contributions (include
section 401(k) and 403(b) employer contributions)
Professional fundraising services. See Part IV, line 17
(If line 11g amount exceeds 10% of line 25,
column (A) amount, list line 11g expenses on Sch O.)
Other expenses. Itemize expenses not covered
above. (List miscellaneous expenses in line 24e. If line
24e amount exceeds 10% of line 25, column (A)
amount, list line 24e expenses on Schedule O.)
Add lines 1 through 24e
Complete this line only if the organization
reported in column (B) joint costs from a combined
educational campaign and fundraising solicitation.
Form 990 (2017) Page
Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in
this Part IX ��������������������������
Total expenses Program service
expenses
Management and
general expenses
80. Fundraising
expenses
~
Grants and other assistance to domestic
individuals. See Part IV, line 22 ~~~~~~~
Grants and other assistance to foreign
organizations, foreign governments, and foreign
individuals. See Part IV, lines 15 and 16 ~~~
Benefits paid to or for members ~~~~~~~
Compensation of current officers, directors,
trustees, and key employees ~~~~~~~~
~~~
Other salaries and wages ~~~~~~~~~~
Other employee benefits ~~~~~~~~~~
Payroll taxes ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fees for services (non-employees):
Management
Legal
Accounting
82. Payments of travel or entertainment expenses
for any federal, state, or local public officials
Conferences, conventions, and meetings ~~
Interest
Payments to affiliates
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization
Insurance
~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
All other expenses
|
Form (2017)
Do not include amounts reported on lines 6b,
7b, 8b, 9b, and 10b of Part VIII.
10
Part IX Statement of Functional Expenses
90. c
e
s
Form 990 (2017) Page
Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in
this Part X �����������������������������
Beginning of year End of year
Cash - non-interest-bearing
Savings and temporary cash investments
Pledges and grants receivable, net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Accounts receivable, net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Loans and other receivables from current and former officers,
directors,
trustees, key employees, and highest compensated employees.
Complete
Part II of Schedule L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
91. Loans and other receivables from other disqualified persons (as
defined under
section 4958(f)(1)), persons described in section 4958(c)(3)(B),
and contributing
employers and sponsoring organizations of section 501(c)(9)
voluntary
employees' beneficiary organizations (see instr). Complete Part
II of Sch L ~~
Notes and loans receivable, net
Inventories for sale or use
Prepaid expenses and deferred charges
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Land, buildings, and equipment: cost or other
basis. Complete Part VI of Schedule D
Less: accumulated depreciation
~~~
~~~~~~
Investments - publicly traded securities
92. Investments - other securities. See Part IV, line 11
Investments - program-related. See Part IV, line 11
Intangible assets
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Other assets. See Part IV, line 11 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Add lines 1 through 15 (must equal line 34) ����������
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Grants payable
Deferred revenue
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tax-exempt bond liabilities
Escrow or custodial account liability. Complete Part IV of
Schedule D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
93. ~~~~
Loans and other payables to current and former officers,
directors, trustees,
key employees, highest compensated employees, and
disqualified persons.
Complete Part II of Schedule L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Secured mortgages and notes payable to unrelated third parties
~~~~~~
Unsecured notes and loans payable to unrelated third parties
~~~~~~~~
Other liabilities (including federal income tax, payables to
related third
parties, and other liabilities not included on lines 17-24).
Complete Part X of
Schedule D ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Add lines 17 through 25 ������������������
|
Unrestricted net assets
Temporarily restricted net assets
Permanently restricted net assets
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
94. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
Capital stock or trust principal, or current funds
Paid-in or capital surplus, or land, building, or equipment fund
Retained earnings, endowment, accumulated income, or other
funds
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~
~~~~
Total net assets or fund balances ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Total liabilities and net assets/fund balances
����������������
Form (2017)
11
Balance SheetPart X
990
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
95. 424,987. 647,680.
778,247. 496,348.
114,304. 77,605.
164,518. 61,774.
1,700,744.
146,993. 1,590,995. 1,553,751.
54,312. 10,930.
2,640. 2,640.
3,130,003. 2,850,728.
386,353. 128,288.
24,888. 19,764.
961,118. 849,670.
38,857. 30,693.
1,411,216. 1,028,415.
X
807,407. 938,647.
911,380. 883,666.
1,718,787. 1,822,313.
3,130,003. 2,850,728.
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
12
98. Form 990 (2017) Page
Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in
this Part XI ���������������������������
Total revenue (must equal Part VIII, column (A), line 12)
Total expenses (must equal Part IX, column (A), line 25)
Revenue less expenses. Subtract line 2 from line 1
Net assets or fund balances at beginning of year (must equal
Part X, line 33, column (A))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments
Donated services and use of facilities
Investment expenses
Prior period adjustments
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
99. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Other changes in net assets or fund balances (explain in
Schedule O)
Net assets or fund balances at end of year. Combine lines 3
through 9 (must equal Part X, line 33,
column (B))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
�����������������������������������
������������
Check if Schedule O contains a response or note to any line in
this Part XII ���������������������������
Accounting method used to prepare the Form 990: Cash Accrual
Other
If the organization changed its method of accounting from a
prior year or checked "Other," explain in Schedule O.
Were the organization's financial statements compiled or
reviewed by an independent accountant? ~~~~~~~~~~~~
If "Yes," check a box below to indicate whether the financial
statements for the year were compiled or reviewed on a
separate basis, consolidated basis, or both:
Separate basis Consolidated basis Both consolidated and
separate basis
100. Were the organization's financial statements audited by an
independent accountant? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If "Yes," check a box below to indicate whether the financial
statements for the year were audited on a separate basis,
consolidated basis, or both:
Separate basis Consolidated basis Both consolidated and
separate basis
If "Yes" to line 2a or 2b, does the organization have a
committee that assumes responsibility for oversight of the audit,
review, or compilation of its financial statements and selection
of an independent accountant?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If the organization changed either its oversight process or
selection process during the tax year, explain in Schedule O.
As a result of a federal award, was the organization required to
undergo an audit or audits as set forth in the Single Audit
Act and OMB Circular A-133?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If "Yes," did the organization undergo the required audit or
audits? If the organization did not undergo the required audit
or audits, explain why in Schedule O and describe any steps
taken to undergo such audits ����������������
Form (2017)
12
101. Part XI Reconciliation of Net Assets
Part XII Financial Statements and Reporting
990
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
3,394,815.
3,291,289.
103,526.
1,718,787.
0.
1,822,313.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
102. 13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
13
(iv) Is the organization listed
in your governing document?
OMB No. 1545-0047
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
732021 10-06-17
(i) (iii) (v) (vi)(ii) Name of supported
organization
Type of organization
(described on lines 1-10
above (see instructions))
Amount of monetary
support (see instructions)
Amount of other
support (see instructions)
EIN
(Form 990 or 990-EZ)
103. Complete if the organization is a section 501(c)(3) organization
or a section
4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust.
| Attach to Form 990 or Form 990-EZ.
| Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest
information.
Open to Public
Inspection
Name of the organization Employer identification number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
104. 12
section 170(b)(1)(A)(i).
section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii).
section 170(b)(1)(A)(iii).
section 170(b)(1)(A)(iii).
section 170(b)(1)(A)(iv).
section 170(b)(1)(A)(v).
section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi).
section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi).
section 170(b)(1)(A)(ix)
section 509(a)(2).
section 509(a)(4).
section 509(a)(1) section 509(a)(2) section 509(a)(3).
a
b
c
d
e
105. f
g
Type I.
You must complete Part IV, Sections A and B.
Type II.
You must complete Part IV, Sections A and C.
Type III functionally integrated.
You must complete Part IV, Sections A, D, and E.
Type III non-functionally integrated.
You must complete Part IV, Sections A and D, and Part V.
Yes No
Total
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for
Form 990 or 990-EZ. Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017
(All organizations must complete this part.) See instructions.
The organization is not a private foundation because it is: (For
lines 1 through 12, check only one box.)
A church, convention of churches, or association of churches
described in
A school described in (Attach Schedule E (Form 990 or 990-
106. EZ).)
A hospital or a cooperative hospital service organization
described in
A medical research organization operated in conjunction with a
hospital described in Enter the hospital's name,
city, and state:
An organization operated for the benefit of a college or
university owned or operated by a governmental unit described
in
(Complete Part II.)
A federal, state, or local government or governmental unit
described in
An organization that normally receives a substantial part of its
support from a governmental unit or from the general public
described in
(Complete Part II.)
A community trust described in (Complete Part II.)
An agricultural research organization described in operated in
conjunction with a land-grant college
or university or a non-land-grant college of agriculture (see
instructions). Enter the name, city, and state of the college or
university:
An organization that normally receives: (1) more than 33 1/3%
107. of its support from contributions, membership fees, and gross
receipts from
activities related to its exempt functions - subject to certain
exceptions, and (2) no more than 33 1/3% of its support from
gross investment
income and unrelated business taxable income (less section 511
tax) from businesses acquired by the organization after June 30,
1975.
See (Complete Part III.)
An organization organized and operated exclusively to test for
public safety. See
An organization organized and operated exclusively for the
benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the
purposes of one or
more publicly supported organizations described in or . See
Check the box in
lines 12a through 12d that describes the type of supporting
organization and complete lines 12e, 12f, and 12g.
A supporting organization operated, supervised, or controlled
by its supported organization(s), typically by giving
the supported organization(s) the power to regularly appoint or
elect a majority of the directors or trustees of the supporting
organization.
A supporting organization supervised or controlled in
connection with its supported organization(s), by having
108. control or management of the supporting organization vested in
the same persons that control or manage the supported
organization(s).
A supporting organization operated in connection with, and
functionally integrated with,
its supported organization(s) (see instructions).
A supporting organization operated in connection with its
supported organization(s)
that is not functionally integrated. The organization generally
must satisfy a distribution requirement and an attentiveness
requirement (see instructions).
Check this box if the organization received a written
determination from the IRS that it is a Type I, Type II, Type III
functionally integrated, or Type III non-functionally integrated
supporting organization.
Enter the number of supported organizations
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Provide the following information about the supported
organization(s).
LHA
SCHEDULE A
Part I Reason for Public Charity Status
109. Public Charity Status and Public Support 2017
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
X
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
14
Subtract line 5 from line 4.
732022 10-06-17
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in)
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) |
2
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
112. 10% -facts-and-circumstances test - 2016.
stop here.
Private foundation.
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017
|
Add lines 7 through 10
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017 Page
(Complete only if you checked the box on line 5, 7, or 8 of Part
I or if the organization failed to qualify under Part III. If the
organization
fails to qualify under the tests listed below, please complete
Part III.)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
Gifts, grants, contributions, and
membership fees received. (Do not
include any "unusual grants.") ~~
Tax revenues levied for the organ-
ization's benefit and either paid to
or expended on its behalf ~~~~
The value of services or facilities
113. furnished by a governmental unit to
the organization without charge ~
Add lines 1 through 3 ~~~
The portion of total contributions
by each person (other than a
governmental unit or publicly
supported organization) included
on line 1 that exceeds 2% of the
amount shown on line 11,
column (f) ~~~~~~~~~~~~
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
Amounts from line 4 ~~~~~~~
Gross income from interest,
dividends, payments received on
securities loans, rents, royalties,
and income from similar sources ~
Net income from unrelated business
activities, whether or not the
114. business is regularly carried on ~
Other income. Do not include gain
or loss from the sale of capital
assets (Explain in Part VI.) ~~~~
Gross receipts from related activities, etc. (see instructions)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third,
fourth, or fifth tax year as a section 501(c)(3)
organization, check this box and
�����������������������������������
���������� |
~~~~~~~~~~~~Public support percentage for 2017 (line 6,
column (f) divided by line 11, column (f))
Public support percentage from 2016 Schedule A, Part II, line
14
%
%~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If the organization did not check the box on line 13, and line 14
is 33 1/3% or more, check this box and
The organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
If the organization did not check a box on line 13 or 16a, and
115. line 15 is 33 1/3% or more, check this box
and The organization qualifies as a publicly supported
organization ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, or 16b,
and line 14 is 10% or more,
and if the organization meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test,
check this box and Explain in Part VI how the organization
meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test. The organization
qualifies as a publicly supported organization
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b, or
17a, and line 15 is 10% or
more, and if the organization meets the "facts-and-
circumstances" test, check this box and Explain in Part VI how
the
organization meets the "facts-and-circumstances" test. The
organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
~~~~~~~~ |
If the organization did not check a box on line 13, 16a, 16b,
17a, or 17b, check this box and see instructions ��� |
Part II Support Schedule for Organizations Described in
Sections 170(b)(1)(A)(iv) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi)
Section A. Public Support
Section B. Total Support
116. Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
2,503,715. 3,120,458. 3,319,207. 3,662,189. 3,298,930.
15,904,499.
2,503,715. 3,120,458. 3,319,207. 3,662,189. 3,298,930.
15,904,499.
1,501,813.
14,402,686.
2,503,715. 3,120,458. 3,319,207. 3,662,189. 3,298,930.
15,904,499.
835. 1,195. 1,889. 1,897. 1,891. 7,707.
15,912,206.
1,224,692.
90.51
85.99
X
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
15
117. (Subtract line 7c from line 6.)
Amounts included on lines 2 and 3 received
from other than disqualified persons that
exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1% of the
amount on line 13 for the year
(Add lines 9, 10c, 11, and 12.)
732023 10-06-17
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) |
Calendar year (or fiscal year beginning in) |
Total support.
3
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
1
2
3
4
5
6
120. Unrelated business taxable income
(less section 511 taxes) from businesses
acquired after June 30, 1975
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017 Page
(Complete only if you checked the box on line 10 of Part I or if
the organization failed to qualify under Part II. If the
organization fails to
qualify under the tests listed below, please complete Part II.)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
Gifts, grants, contributions, and
membership fees received. (Do not
include any "unusual grants.") ~~
Gross receipts from admissions,
merchandise sold or services per-
formed, or facilities furnished in
any activity that is related to the
organization's tax-exempt purpose
Gross receipts from activities that
are not an unrelated trade or bus-
iness under section 513 ~~~~~
Tax revenues levied for the organ-
121. ization's benefit and either paid to
or expended on its behalf ~~~~
The value of services or facilities
furnished by a governmental unit to
the organization without charge ~
~~~ Add lines 1 through 5
Amounts included on lines 1, 2, and
3 received from disqualified persons
~~~~~~
Add lines 7a and 7b ~~~~~~~
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
Amounts from line 6 ~~~~~~~
Gross income from interest,
dividends, payments received on
securities loans, rents, royalties,
and income from similar sources ~
~~~~
Add lines 10a and 10b ~~~~~~
Net income from unrelated business
activities not included in line 10b,
whether or not the business is
regularly carried on ~~~~~~~
Other income. Do not include gain
122. or loss from the sale of capital
assets (Explain in Part VI.) ~~~~
If the Form 990 is for the organization's first, second, third,
fourth, or fifth tax year as a section 501(c)(3) organization,
check this box and
�����������������������������������
����������������� |
Public support percentage for 2017 (line 8, column (f) divided
by line 13, column (f))
Public support percentage from 2016 Schedule A, Part III, line
15
~~~~~~~~~~~~ %
%��������������������
Investment income percentage for (line 10c, column (f) divided
by line 13, column (f))
Investment income percentage from Schedule A, Part III, line
17
~~~~~~~~ %
%~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If the organization did not check the box on line 14, and line 15
is more than 33 1/3%, and line 17 is not
more than 33 1/3%, check this box and The organization
qualifies as a publicly supported organization ~~~~~~~~~~ |
123. If the organization did not check a box on line 14 or line 19a,
and line 16 is more than 33 1/3%, and
line 18 is not more than 33 1/3%, check this box and The
organization qualifies as a publicly supported organization
~~~~ |
If the organization did not check a box on line 14, 19a, or 19b,
check this box and see instructions �������� |
Part III Support Schedule for Organizations Described in
Section 509(a)(2)
Section A. Public Support
Section B. Total Support
Section C. Computation of Public Support Percentage
Section D. Computation of Investment Income Percentage
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
16
732024 10-06-17
4
127. Part VI.
Part VI.
Part VI.
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017
If "No," describe in how the supported organizations are
designated. If designated by
class or purpose, describe the designation. If historic and
continuing relationship, explain.
If "Yes," explain in how the organization determined that the
supported
organization was described in section 509(a)(1) or (2).
If "Yes," answer
(b) and (c) below.
If "Yes," describe in when and how the
organization made the determination.
If "Yes," explain in what controls the organization put in place
to ensure such use.
If
"Yes," and if you checked 12a or 12b in Part I, answer (b) and
(c) below.
If "Yes," describe in how the organization had such control and
discretion
despite being controlled or supervised by or in connection with
its supported organizations.
If "Yes," explain in what controls the organization used
128. to ensure that all support to the foreign supported organization
was used exclusively for section 170(c)(2)(B)
purposes.
If "Yes,"
answer (b) and (c) below (if applicable). Also, provide detail in
including (i) the names and EIN
numbers of the supported organizations added, substituted, or
removed; (ii) the reasons for each such action;
(iii) the authority under the organization's organizing document
authorizing such action; and (iv) how the action
was accomplished (such as by amendment to the organizing
document).
If "Yes," provide detail in
If "Yes," complete Part I of Schedule L (Form 990 or 990-EZ).
If "Yes," complete Part I of Schedule L (Form 990 or 990-EZ).
If "Yes," provide detail in
If "Yes," provide detail in
If "Yes," provide detail in
If "Yes," answer 10b below.
(Use Schedule C, Form 4720, to
determine whether the organization had excess business
holdings.)
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017 Page
(Complete only if you checked a box in line 12 on Part I. If you
checked 12a of Part I, complete Sections A
129. and B. If you checked 12b of Part I, complete Sections A and C.
If you checked 12c of Part I, complete
Sections A, D, and E. If you checked 12d of Part I, complete
Sections A and D, and complete Part V.)
Are all of the organization's supported organizations listed by
name in the organization's governing
documents?
Did the organization have any supported organization that does
not have an IRS determination of status
under section 509(a)(1) or (2)?
Did the organization have a supported organization described in
section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6)?
Did the organization confirm that each supported organization
qualified under section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6) and
satisfied the public support tests under section 509(a)(2)?
Did the organization ensure that all support to such
organizations was used exclusively for section 170(c)(2)(B)
purposes?
Was any supported organization not organized in the United
States ("foreign supported organization")?
Did the organization have ultimate control and discretion in
deciding whether to make grants to the foreign
130. supported organization?
Did the organization support any foreign supported organization
that does not have an IRS determination
under sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(1) or (2)?
Did the organization add, substitute, or remove any supported
organizations during the tax year?
Was any added or substituted supported organization part of a
class already
designated in the organization's organizing document?
Was the substitution the result of an event beyond the
organization's control?
Did the organization provide support (whether in the form of
grants or the provision of services or facilities) to
anyone other than (i) its supported organizations, (ii)
individuals that are part of the charitable class
benefited by one or more of its supported organizations, or (iii)
other supporting organizations that also
support or benefit one or more of the filing organization's
supported organizations?
Did the organization provide a grant, loan, compensation, or
other similar payment to a substantial contributor
(defined in section 4958(c)(3)(C)), a family member of a
substantial contributor, or a 35% controlled entity with
131. regard to a substantial contributor?
Did the organization make a loan to a disqualified person (as
defined in section 4958) not described in line 7?
Was the organization controlled directly or indirectly at any
time during the tax year by one or more
disqualified persons as defined in section 4946 (other than
foundation managers and organizations described
in section 509(a)(1) or (2))?
Did one or more disqualified persons (as defined in line 9a)
hold a controlling interest in any entity in which
the supporting organization had an interest?
Did a disqualified person (as defined in line 9a) have an
ownership interest in, or derive any personal benefit
from, assets in which the supporting organization also had an
interest?
Was the organization subject to the excess business holdings
rules of section 4943 because of section
4943(f) (regarding certain Type II supporting organizations, and
all Type III non-functionally integrated
supporting organizations)?
Did the organization have any excess business holdings in the
tax year?
132. Part IV Supporting Organizations
Section A. All Supporting Organizations
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
17
732025 10-06-17
5
Yes No
11
a
b
c
11a
11b
11cPart VI.
Yes No
1
135. 2b
3a
3b
Part VI
Answer (a) and (b) below.
Part VI.
Part VI
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017
If "Yes" to a, b, or c, provide detail in
If "No," describe in how the supported organization(s)
effectively operated, supervised, or
controlled the organization's activities. If the organization had
more than one supported organization,
describe how the powers to appoint and/or remove directors or
trustees were allocated among the supported
organizations and what conditions or restrictions, if any,
applied to such powers during the tax year.
If "Yes," explain in
how providing such benefit carried out the purposes of the
supported organization(s) that operated,
supervised, or controlled the supporting organization.
If "No," describe in how control
or management of the supporting organization was vested in the
136. same persons that controlled or managed
the supported organization(s).
If "No," explain in how
the organization maintained a close and continuous working
relationship with the supported organization(s).
If "Yes," describe in the role the organization's
supported organizations played in this regard.
Check the box next to the method that the organization used to
satisfy the Integral Part Test during the year
Complete below.
Complete below.
Describe in how you supported a government entity (see
instructions).
If "Yes," then in
how these activities directly furthered their exempt purposes,
how the organization was responsive to those supported
organizations, and how the organization determined
that these activities constituted substantially all of its activities.
If "Yes," explain in the
reasons for the organization's position that its supported
organization(s) would have engaged in these
activities but for the organization's involvement.
Provide details in
If "Yes," describe in the role played by the organization in this
regard.
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017 Page
137. Has the organization accepted a gift or contribution from any of
the following persons?
A person who directly or indirectly controls, either alone or
together with persons described in (b) and (c)
below, the governing body of a supported organization?
A family member of a person described in (a) above?
A 35% controlled entity of a person described in (a) or (b)
above?
Did the directors, trustees, or membership of one or more
supported organizations have the power to
regularly appoint or elect at least a majority of the
organization's directors or trustees at all times during the
tax year?
Did the organization operate for the benefit of any supported
organization other than the supported
organization(s) that operated, supervised, or controlled the
supporting organization?
Were a majority of the organization's directors or trustees
during the tax year also a majority of the directors
or trustees of each of the organization's supported
organization(s)?
Did the organization provide to each of its supported
organizations, by the last day of the fifth month of the
138. organization's tax year, (i) a written notice describing the type
and amount of support provided during the prior tax
year, (ii) a copy of the Form 990 that was most recently filed as
of the date of notification, and (iii) copies of the
organization's governing documents in effect on the date of
notification, to the extent not previously provided?
Were any of the organization's officers, directors, or trustees
either (i) appointed or elected by the supported
organization(s) or (ii) serving on the governing body of a
supported organization?
By reason of the relationship described in (2), did the
organization's supported organizations have a
significant voice in the organization's investment policies and in
directing the use of the organization's
income or assets at all times during the tax year?
The organization satisfied the Activities Test.
The organization is the parent of each of its supported
organizations.
The organization supported a governmental entity.
Activities Test.
Did substantially all of the organization's activities during the
tax year directly further the exempt purposes of
139. the supported organization(s) to which the organization was
responsive?
Did the activities described in (a) constitute activities that, but
for the organization's involvement, one or more
of the organization's supported organization(s) would have been
engaged in?
Parent of Supported Organizations.
Did the organization have the power to regularly appoint or
elect a majority of the officers, directors, or
trustees of each of the supported organizations?
Did the organization exercise a substantial degree of direction
over the policies, programs, and activities of each
of its supported organizations?
(continued)Part IV Supporting Organizations
Section B. Type I Supporting Organizations
Section C. Type II Supporting Organizations
Section D. All Type III Supporting Organizations
Section E. Type III Functionally Integrated Supporting
Organizations
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
140. 13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
18
732026 10-06-17
6
1 See instructions.
Section A - Adjusted Net Income
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
143. 2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
Distributable Amount.
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017 Page
Check here if the organization satisfied the Integral Part Test as
a qualifying trust on Nov. 20, 1970 (explain in Part VI.) All
other Type III non-functionally integrated supporting
organizations must complete Sections A through E.
144. (B) Current Year
(optional)(A) Prior Year
Net short-term capital gain
Recoveries of prior-year distributions
Other gross income (see instructions)
Add lines 1 through 3
Depreciation and depletion
Portion of operating expenses paid or incurred for production or
collection of gross income or for management, conservation, or
maintenance of property held for production of income (see
instructions)
Other expenses (see instructions)
(subtract lines 5, 6, and 7 from line 4)
(B) Current Year
(optional)(A) Prior Year
Aggregate fair market value of all non-exempt-use assets (see
instructions for short tax year or assets held for part of year):
Average monthly value of securities
Average monthly cash balances
Fair market value of other non-exempt-use assets
145. (add lines 1a, 1b, and 1c)
claimed for blockage or other
factors (explain in detail in ):
Acquisition indebtedness applicable to non-exempt-use assets
Subtract line 2 from line 1d
Cash deemed held for exempt use. Enter 1-1/2% of line 3 (for
greater amount,
see instructions)
Net value of non-exempt-use assets (subtract line 4 from line 3)
Multiply line 5 by .035
Recoveries of prior-year distributions
(add line 7 to line 6)
Current Year
Adjusted net income for prior year (from Section A, line 8,
Column A)
Enter 85% of line 1
Minimum asset amount for prior year (from Section B, line 8,
Column A)
Enter greater of line 2 or line 3
146. Income tax imposed in prior year
Subtract line 5 from line 4, unless subject to
emergency temporary reduction (see instructions)
Check here if the current year is the organization's first as a
non-functionally integrated Type III supporting organization
(see
instructions).
Part V Type III Non-Functionally Integrated 509(a)(3)
Supporting Organizations
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
19
732027 10-06-17
7
Section D - Distributions Current Year
1
2
3
147. 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Part VI
Total annual distributions.
Part VI
(i)
Excess Distributions
(ii)
Underdistributions
Pre-2017
(iii)
Distributable
Amount for 2017
Section E - Distribution Allocations (see instructions)
149. j
Total
a
b
c
Part VI.
Part VI
Excess distributions carryover to 2018.
a
b
c
d
e
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017 Page
Amounts paid to supported organizations to accomplish exempt
purposes
Amounts paid to perform activity that directly furthers exempt
purposes of supported
150. organizations, in excess of income from activity
Administrative expenses paid to accomplish exempt purposes of
supported organizations
Amounts paid to acquire exempt-use assets
Qualified set-aside amounts (prior IRS approval required)
Other distributions (describe in ). See instructions.
Add lines 1 through 6.
Distributions to attentive supported organizations to which the
organization is responsive
(provide details in ). See instructions.
Distributable amount for 2017 from Section C, line 6
Line 8 amount divided by line 9 amount
Distributable amount for 2017 from Section C, line 6
Underdistributions, if any, for years prior to 2017 (reason-
able cause required- explain in ). See instructions.
Excess distributions carryover, if any, to 2017
From 2013
From 2014
From 2015
151. From 2016
of lines 3a through e
Applied to underdistributions of prior years
Applied to 2017 distributable amount
Carryover from 2012 not applied (see instructions)
Remainder. Subtract lines 3g, 3h, and 3i from 3f.
Distributions for 2017 from Section D,
line 7: $
Applied to underdistributions of prior years
Applied to 2017 distributable amount
Remainder. Subtract lines 4a and 4b from 4.
Remaining underdistributions for years prior to 2017, if
any. Subtract lines 3g and 4a from line 2. For result greater
than zero, explain in See instructions.
Remaining underdistributions for 2017. Subtract lines 3h
and 4b from line 1. For result greater than zero, explain in
. See instructions.
Add lines 3j
152. and 4c.
Breakdown of line 7:
Excess from 2013
Excess from 2014
Excess from 2015
Excess from 2016
Excess from 2017
(continued) Part V Type III Non-Functionally Integrated
509(a)(3) Supporting Organizations
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
20
732028 10-06-17
8
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017
Schedule A (Form 990 or 990-EZ) 2017 Page
Provide the explanations required by Part II, line 10; Part II,
line 17a or 17b; Part III, line 12;
Part IV, Section A, lines 1, 2, 3b, 3c, 4b, 4c, 5a, 6, 9a, 9b, 9c,
153. 11a, 11b, and 11c; Part IV, Section B, lines 1 and 2; Part IV,
Section C,
line 1; Part IV, Section D, lines 2 and 3; Part IV, Section E,
lines 1c, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b; Part V, line 1; Part V, Section B,
line 1e; Part V,
Section D, lines 5, 6, and 8; and Part V, Section E, lines 2, 5,
and 6. Also complete this part for any additional information.
(See instructions.)
Part VI Supplemental Information.
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
21
OMB No. 1545-0047
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
723451 11-01-17
Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2017)
(Form 990, 990-EZ,
or 990-PF)
| Attach to Form 990, Form 990-EZ, or Form 990-PF.
| Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for the latest information.
Name of the organization Employer identification number
154. Organization type
Filers of: Section:
not
General Rule Special Rule.
Note:
General Rule
Special Rules
(1) (2)
General Rule
Caution:
must
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the instructions for
Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF.
exclusively
exclusively
exclusively
nonexclusively
(check one):
Form 990 or 990-EZ 501(c)( ) (enter number) organization
155. 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust treated as a private
foundation
527 political organization
Form 990-PF 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation
4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust treated as a private
foundation
501(c)(3) taxable private foundation
Check if your organization is covered by the or a
Only a section 501(c)(7), (8), or (10) organization can check
boxes for both the General Rule and a Special Rule. See
instructions.
For an organization filing Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF that
received, during the year, contributions totaling $5,000 or more
(in money or
property) from any one contributor. Complete Parts I and II. See
instructions for determining a contributor's total contributions.
For an organization described in section 501(c)(3) filing Form
990 or 990-EZ that met the 33 1/3% support test of the
regulations under
sections 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi), that checked Schedule
A (Form 990 or 990-EZ), Part II, line 13, 16a, or 16b, and that
received from
any one contributor, during the year, total contributions of the
greater of $5,000; or 2% of the amount on (i) Form 990, Part
VIII, line 1h;
156. or (ii) Form 990-EZ, line 1. Complete Parts I and II.
For an organization described in section 501(c)(7), (8), or (10)
filing Form 990 or 990-EZ that received from any one
contributor, during the
year, total contributions of more than $1,000 for religious,
charitable, scientific, literary, or educational purposes, or for
the prevention of cruelty to children or animals. Complete Parts
I, II, and III.
For an organization described in section 501(c)(7), (8), or (10)
filing Form 990 or 990-EZ that received from any one
contributor, during the
year, contributions for religious, charitable, etc., purposes, but
no such contributions totaled more than $1,000. If this box
is checked, enter here the total contributions that were received
during the year for an religious, charitable, etc.,
purpose. Don't complete any of the parts unless the applies to
this organization because it received
religious, charitable, etc., contributions totaling $5,000 or more
during the year ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | $
An organization that isn't covered by the General Rule and/or
the Special Rules doesn't file Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or
990-PF),
but it answer "No" on Part IV, line 2, of its Form 990; or check
the box on line H of its Form 990-EZ or on its Form 990-PF,
Part I, line 2, to
157. certify that it doesn't meet the filing requirements of Schedule B
(Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF).
LHA
Schedule B Schedule of Contributors
2017
** PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COPY **
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
X 3
X
723452 11-01-17
Name of organization Employer identification number
Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2017)
158. (a)
No.
(b)
Name, address, and ZIP + 4
(c)
Total contributions
(d)
Type of contribution
Person
Payroll
Noncash
(a)
No.
(b)
Name, address, and ZIP + 4
(c)
Total contributions
(d)
160. Name, address, and ZIP + 4
(c)
Total contributions
(d)
Type of contribution
Person
Payroll
Noncash
(a)
No.
(b)
Name, address, and ZIP + 4
(c)
Total contributions
(d)
Type of contribution
Person
Payroll
161. Noncash
(a)
No.
(b)
Name, address, and ZIP + 4
(c)
Total contributions
(d)
Type of contribution
Person
Payroll
Noncash
Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2017) Page
(see instructions). Use duplicate copies of Part I if additional
space is needed.
$
(Complete Part II for
noncash contributions.)
$
162. (Complete Part II for
noncash contributions.)
$
(Complete Part II for
noncash contributions.)
$
(Complete Part II for
noncash contributions.)
$
(Complete Part II for
noncash contributions.)
$
(Complete Part II for
noncash contributions.)
2
Part I Contributors
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
1 X
163. 226,057.
2 X
90,140.
3 X
100,000.
4 X
77,600.
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
23
723453 11-01-17
Name of organization Employer identification number
Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2017)
(a)
No.
from
Part I
(c)
164. FMV (or estimate)
(See instructions.)
(b)
Description of noncash property given
(d)
Date received
(a)
No.
from
Part I
(c)
FMV (or estimate)
(See instructions.)
(b)
Description of noncash property given
(d)
Date received
(a)
165. No.
from
Part I
(c)
FMV (or estimate)
(See instructions.)
(b)
Description of noncash property given
(d)
Date received
(a)
No.
from
Part I
(c)
FMV (or estimate)
(See instructions.)
(b)
166. Description of noncash property given
(d)
Date received
(a)
No.
from
Part I
(c)
FMV (or estimate)
(See instructions.)
(b)
Description of noncash property given
(d)
Date received
(a)
No.
from
Part I
167. (c)
FMV (or estimate)
(See instructions.)
(b)
Description of noncash property given
(d)
Date received
Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2017) Page
(see instructions). Use duplicate copies of Part II if additional
space is needed.
$
$
$
$
$
$
3
Part II Noncash Property
168. MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
24
(Enter this info. once.)
For organizations
completing Part III, enter the total of exclusively religious,
charitable, etc., contributions of $1,000 or less for the year.
723454 11-01-17
Name of organization Employer identification number
religious, charitable, etc., contributions to organizations
described in section 501(c)(7), (8), or (10) that total more than
$1,000 for
the year from any one contributor. (a) (e) and
Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2017)
(a) No.
from
Part I
(b) Purpose of gift (c) Use of gift (d) Description of how gift is
held
(e) Transfer of gift
169. Transferee's name, address, and ZIP + 4 Relationship of
transferor to transferee
(a) No.
from
Part I
(b) Purpose of gift (c) Use of gift (d) Description of how gift is
held
(e) Transfer of gift
Transferee's name, address, and ZIP + 4 Relationship of
transferor to transferee
(a) No.
from
Part I
(b) Purpose of gift (c) Use of gift (d) Description of how gift is
held
(e) Transfer of gift
Transferee's name, address, and ZIP + 4 Relationship of
transferor to transferee
(a) No.
from
Part I
(b) Purpose of gift (c) Use of gift (d) Description of how gift is
held
(e) Transfer of gift
170. Transferee's name, address, and ZIP + 4 Relationship of
transferor to transferee
Complete columns through the following line entry.
Schedule B (Form 990, 990-EZ, or 990-PF) (2017) Page
| $
Use duplicate copies of Part III if additional space is needed.
Exclusively
4
Part III
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
25
OMB No. 1545-0047
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
732051 10-09-17
Held at the End of the Tax Year
(Form 990) | Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on
171. Form 990,
Part IV, line 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11a, 11b, 11c, 11d, 11e, 11f, 12a, or
12b.
| Attach to Form 990.
|Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest
information.
Open to Public
Inspection
Name of the organization Employer identification number
(a) (b)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Yes No
Yes No
1
2
3
173. a
b
(i)
(ii)
a
b
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for
Form 990. Schedule D (Form 990) 2017
Complete if the
organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part IV, line 6.
Donor advised funds Funds and other accounts
Total number at end of year
Aggregate value of contributions to (during year)
Aggregate value of grants from (during year)
Aggregate value at end of year
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~
~~~~~~
174. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization inform all donors and donor advisors in
writing that the assets held in donor advised funds
are the organization's property, subject to the organization's
exclusive legal control? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization inform all grantees, donors, and donor
advisors in writing that grant funds can be used only
for charitable purposes and not for the benefit of the donor or
donor advisor, or for any other purpose conferring
impermissible private benefit?
�����������������������������������
���������
Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part
IV, line 7.
Purpose(s) of conservation easements held by the organization
(check all that apply).
Preservation of land for public use (e.g., recreation or
education)
Protection of natural habitat
Preservation of open space
Preservation of a historically important land area
Preservation of a certified historic structure
Complete lines 2a through 2d if the organization held a
175. qualified conservation contribution in the form of a
conservation easement on the last
day of the tax year.
Total number of conservation easements
Total acreage restricted by conservation easements
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Number of conservation easements on a certified historic
structure included in (a)
Number of conservation easements included in (c) acquired
after 7/25/06, and not on a historic structure
listed in the National Register
~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Number of conservation easements modified, transferred,
released, extinguished, or terminated by the organization during
the tax
year |
Number of states where property subject to conservation
easement is located |
Does the organization have a written policy regarding the
periodic monitoring, inspection, handling of
176. violations, and enforcement of the conservation easements it
holds? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Staff and volunteer hours devoted to monitoring, inspecting,
handling of violations, and enforcing conservation easements
during the year
|
Amount of expenses incurred in monitoring, inspecting,
handling of violations, and enforcing conservation easements
during the year
| $
Does each conservation easement reported on line 2(d) above
satisfy the requirements of section 170(h)(4)(B)(i)
and section 170(h)(4)(B)(ii)?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In Part XIII, describe how the organization reports conservation
easements in its revenue and expense statement, and balance
sheet, and
include, if applicable, the text of the footnote to the
organization's financial statements that describes the
organization's accounting for
conservation easements.
Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part
IV, line 8.
If the organization elected, as permitted under SFAS 116 (ASC
177. 958), not to report in its revenue statement and balance sheet
works of art,
historical treasures, or other similar assets held for public
exhibition, education, or research in furtherance of public
service, provide, in Part XIII,
the text of the footnote to its financial statements that describes
these items.
If the organization elected, as permitted under SFAS 116 (ASC
958), to report in its revenue statement and balance sheet works
of art, historical
treasures, or other similar assets held for public exhibition,
education, or research in furtherance of public service, provide
the following amounts
relating to these items:
Revenue included on Form 990, Part VIII, line 1
Assets included in Form 990, Part X
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | $
$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
If the organization received or held works of art, historical
treasures, or other similar assets for financial gain, provide
the following amounts required to be reported under SFAS 116
(ASC 958) relating to these items:
Revenue included on Form 990, Part VIII, line 1
178. Assets included in Form 990, Part X
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | $
$����������������������������������
� |
LHA
Part I Organizations Maintaining Donor Advised Funds or Other
Similar Funds or Accounts.
Part II Conservation Easements.
Part III Organizations Maintaining Collections of Art,
Historical Treasures, or Other Similar Assets.
SCHEDULE D Supplemental Financial Statements 2017
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
26
732052 10-09-17
3
182. Schedule D (Form 990) 2017
(continued)
(Column (d) must equal Form 990, Part X, column (B), line
10c.)
Two years back Three years back Four years back
Schedule D (Form 990) 2017 Page
Using the organization's acquisition, accession, and other
records, check any of the following that are a significant use of
its collection items
(check all that apply):
Public exhibition
Scholarly research
Preservation for future generations
Loan or exchange programs
Other
Provide a description of the organization's collections and
explain how they further the organization's exempt purpose in
Part XIII.
During the year, did the organization solicit or receive
donations of art, historical treasures, or other similar assets
to be sold to raise funds rather than to be maintained as part of
the organization's collection? ������������
183. Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part
IV, line 9, or
reported an amount on Form 990, Part X, line 21.
Is the organization an agent, trustee, custodian or other
intermediary for contributions or other assets not included
on Form 990, Part X?
If "Yes," explain the arrangement in Part XIII and complete the
following table:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Amount
Beginning balance
Additions during the year
Distributions during the year
Ending balance
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did the organization include an amount on Form 990, Part X,
line 21, for escrow or custodial account liability?
184. If "Yes," explain the arrangement in Part XIII. Check here if the
explanation has been provided on Part XIII
~~~~~
�������������
Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part
IV, line 10.
Current year Prior year
Beginning of year balance
Contributions
Net investment earnings, gains, and losses
Grants or scholarships
~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~
Other expenditures for facilities
and programs
Administrative expenses
End of year balance
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
185. ~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~
Provide the estimated percentage of the current year end
balance (line 1g, column (a)) held as:
Board designated or quasi-endowment
Permanent endowment
Temporarily restricted endowment
The percentages on lines 2a, 2b, and 2c should equal 100%.
| %
| %
| %
Are there endowment funds not in the possession of the
organization that are held and administered for the organization
by:
unrelated organizations
related organizations
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If "Yes" on line 3a(ii), are the related organizations listed as
required on Schedule R?
186. Describe in Part XIII the intended uses of the organization's
endowment funds.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part
IV, line 11a. See Form 990, Part X, line 10.
Description of property Cost or other
basis (investment)
Cost or other
basis (other)
Accumulated
depreciation
Book value
Land
Buildings
Leasehold improvements
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~
Equipment
Other
187. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
��������������������
Add lines 1a through 1e. |�������������
2
Part III Organizations Maintaining Collections of Art,
Historical Treasures, or Other Similar Assets
Part IV Escrow and Custodial Arrangements.
Part V Endowment Funds.
Part VI Land, Buildings, and Equipment.
MAN IN THE MIRROR, INC. 59-3178628
602,690. 602,690.
931,603. 931,603.
166,451. 146,993. 19,458.
1,553,751.
13190427 757954 70-01365.000 2017.03030 MAN IN THE
MIRROR, INC. 70-01361
27
(including name of security)
189. (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Total.
(a) (b) 1.
Total.
2.
Schedule D (Form 990) 2017
(Column (b) must equal Form 990, Part X, col. (B) line 15.)
(Column (b) must equal Form 990, Part X, col. (B) line 25.)
Description of security or category
(Col. (b) must equal Form 990, Part X, col. (B) line 12.) |
190. (Col. (b) must equal Form 990, Part X, col. (B) line 13.) |
Schedule D (Form 990) 2017 Page
Complete if the organization answered "Yes" on Form 990, Part
IV, line 11b. See Form 990, Part X, line 12.
Book value Method of valuation: Cost or end-of-year market
value
Financial derivatives
Closely-held equity interests
Other
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
(H)