COLLABORATIVE ENGINEERING WITH IFC
Common practice in the Netherlands
Léon van Berlo; Gijs Derks; Cyrille Pennavaire; Paul Bos
NETHERLANDS ORGANISATION FOR
APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH TNO
Helmond
Eindhoven
Rijswijk
Delft
Leiden
The Hague
Zeist
Utrecht
Groningen
Soesterberg
INTERNATIONAL
OFFICES / AGENCIES
Offices
Agencies
Trends Transitions
THE POWER OF TNO
FROM IDEA TO INNOVATION
Trends Transitions
THIS RESEARCH
Interviews with practice
Co-authors are all practitioners
Goal:
Finding out if there is a ‘generic’ process flow when using BIM
Methodology:
Interviews and observations
Focus/scope
Contractors and suppliers
Collaborative engineering with IFC
CONCLUSION
Tentative conclusions (industry still in development)
Found
IFC still works (with reference model concept)
Companies use the same kind of phases
But don’t give the same names to the phases
Standard iteration inside phases
So let’s have a look at the phases.….
Collaborative engineering with IFC
SOME NOTES ON THE SIDE
Interviews also found sentiment:
Many unnecessary myths still around about IFC
Growing use of BCF to communicate issues
Top down policy makers are not on the same track
It’s not about the perfect model
Standardized ‘BIM Execution plan’ is not possible
Agreements about the model are important, but MVD’s are weird
Classifications are important, but concept libraries are weird
Collaborative engineering with IFC
FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS
Get the naming straight
Educate top down policy thinkers / Look at current practice!
Increase priority on BIM education (myths)
Collaborative engineering with IFC
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

CIB W78 - Collaborative engineering with IFC in the Netherlands

  • 1.
    COLLABORATIVE ENGINEERING WITHIFC Common practice in the Netherlands Léon van Berlo; Gijs Derks; Cyrille Pennavaire; Paul Bos
  • 2.
    NETHERLANDS ORGANISATION FOR APPLIEDSCIENTIFIC RESEARCH TNO Helmond Eindhoven Rijswijk Delft Leiden The Hague Zeist Utrecht Groningen Soesterberg
  • 3.
  • 4.
    THE POWER OFTNO FROM IDEA TO INNOVATION Trends Transitions
  • 5.
    THIS RESEARCH Interviews withpractice Co-authors are all practitioners Goal: Finding out if there is a ‘generic’ process flow when using BIM Methodology: Interviews and observations Focus/scope Contractors and suppliers Collaborative engineering with IFC
  • 6.
    CONCLUSION Tentative conclusions (industrystill in development) Found IFC still works (with reference model concept) Companies use the same kind of phases But don’t give the same names to the phases Standard iteration inside phases So let’s have a look at the phases.…. Collaborative engineering with IFC
  • 9.
    SOME NOTES ONTHE SIDE Interviews also found sentiment: Many unnecessary myths still around about IFC Growing use of BCF to communicate issues Top down policy makers are not on the same track It’s not about the perfect model Standardized ‘BIM Execution plan’ is not possible Agreements about the model are important, but MVD’s are weird Classifications are important, but concept libraries are weird Collaborative engineering with IFC
  • 10.
    FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS Get thenaming straight Educate top down policy thinkers / Look at current practice! Increase priority on BIM education (myths) Collaborative engineering with IFC
  • 11.
    THANK YOU FORYOUR ATTENTION