Researching language/languaging in contexts of pain and pressure: perspective...RMBorders
Andrews, J. (University of the West of England) and Fay, R. (University of Manchester), Researching language/languaging in contexts of pain and pressure: perspectives from 1946 and 2016. Paper presented at the “Taking stock of Applied Linguistics – where are we now?” 49th Annual Meeting of the British Association of Applied Linguistics (BAAL), hosted by Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, 1st-3rd September, 2016.
BERA Symposium 2021 Critical ethical reflexivity for practice and knowledge -...Alison Fox
These were slides offered as the first paper in the symposium Thinking critically and ethically in educational research for the Research Methodology in Education SIG, BERA annual conference, 16th Sept 2021
Researching Multilingually and Translating Cultures Hub
Presented by Prue Holmes
7 Dec 2015, University of Glasgow
Languages, Refugees & Migration Event
TESOL 2010 Luminary Session
Ulla Connor, PhD
Indiana Center for Intercultural Communication
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
Bill Eggington, PhD
Professor and Chair, Linguistics and English Language Department,
Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
9. November 08: Introduction to Environmental Knolwedges in Asia
• Wrecthed of the Earth --- IV. On National Culture (pp. 145-169)
• Rubis JM and Theriault N (2019) Concealing Protocols: Conservation, Indigenous Survivance, and
the Dilemmas of Visibility. Social and Cultural Geography. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2019.1574882.
• Paredes, Oona. 2016. “Rivers of Memory and Oceans of Difference in the Lumad World of Mindan-
ao,” TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 4(2): 329-349.
• Viewing of One Night in Bhopal (documentary)
This presentation formed part of the HEA-funded workshop 'Reflexive learning for the researching professional'.
This workshop explored the importance of reflexivity in professional learning, particularly in the context of doctoral research. From an understanding of reflexivity as critical self-awareness of our ways of being, knowing and doing, concepts such as identity, reflexive dialogue, liminality and transformation will be explored. Reflexivity will be illustrated from practitioner perspectives.
This presentation forms part of a blog post which can be accessed via: http://bit.ly/K8twPT
For further details of HEA Social Sciences work relating to teaching research methods please see http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/disciplines/Soc_Sci/Strategic_2013/ResearchMethods
Studying young people’s online social practices - Combining virtual ethnography, participant observation, online conversations and questionnaire data.
Guest lecture by Malene Charlotte Larsen, Assistant Professor at Aalborg University, at the PhD course: Mixed Methods Research: Theory and Practice, AAU, Jan 31 2013
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
Researching language/languaging in contexts of pain and pressure: perspective...RMBorders
Andrews, J. (University of the West of England) and Fay, R. (University of Manchester), Researching language/languaging in contexts of pain and pressure: perspectives from 1946 and 2016. Paper presented at the “Taking stock of Applied Linguistics – where are we now?” 49th Annual Meeting of the British Association of Applied Linguistics (BAAL), hosted by Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, 1st-3rd September, 2016.
BERA Symposium 2021 Critical ethical reflexivity for practice and knowledge -...Alison Fox
These were slides offered as the first paper in the symposium Thinking critically and ethically in educational research for the Research Methodology in Education SIG, BERA annual conference, 16th Sept 2021
Researching Multilingually and Translating Cultures Hub
Presented by Prue Holmes
7 Dec 2015, University of Glasgow
Languages, Refugees & Migration Event
TESOL 2010 Luminary Session
Ulla Connor, PhD
Indiana Center for Intercultural Communication
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
Bill Eggington, PhD
Professor and Chair, Linguistics and English Language Department,
Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
9. November 08: Introduction to Environmental Knolwedges in Asia
• Wrecthed of the Earth --- IV. On National Culture (pp. 145-169)
• Rubis JM and Theriault N (2019) Concealing Protocols: Conservation, Indigenous Survivance, and
the Dilemmas of Visibility. Social and Cultural Geography. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2019.1574882.
• Paredes, Oona. 2016. “Rivers of Memory and Oceans of Difference in the Lumad World of Mindan-
ao,” TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 4(2): 329-349.
• Viewing of One Night in Bhopal (documentary)
This presentation formed part of the HEA-funded workshop 'Reflexive learning for the researching professional'.
This workshop explored the importance of reflexivity in professional learning, particularly in the context of doctoral research. From an understanding of reflexivity as critical self-awareness of our ways of being, knowing and doing, concepts such as identity, reflexive dialogue, liminality and transformation will be explored. Reflexivity will be illustrated from practitioner perspectives.
This presentation forms part of a blog post which can be accessed via: http://bit.ly/K8twPT
For further details of HEA Social Sciences work relating to teaching research methods please see http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/disciplines/Soc_Sci/Strategic_2013/ResearchMethods
Studying young people’s online social practices - Combining virtual ethnography, participant observation, online conversations and questionnaire data.
Guest lecture by Malene Charlotte Larsen, Assistant Professor at Aalborg University, at the PhD course: Mixed Methods Research: Theory and Practice, AAU, Jan 31 2013
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex ProofsAlex Pruden
This paper presents Reef, a system for generating publicly verifiable succinct non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs that a committed document matches or does not match a regular expression. We describe applications such as proving the strength of passwords, the provenance of email despite redactions, the validity of oblivious DNS queries, and the existence of mutations in DNA. Reef supports the Perl Compatible Regular Expression syntax, including wildcards, alternation, ranges, capture groups, Kleene star, negations, and lookarounds. Reef introduces a new type of automata, Skipping Alternating Finite Automata (SAFA), that skips irrelevant parts of a document when producing proofs without undermining soundness, and instantiates SAFA with a lookup argument. Our experimental evaluation confirms that Reef can generate proofs for documents with 32M characters; the proofs are small and cheap to verify (under a second).
Paper: https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/1886
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !KatiaHIMEUR1
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
Maruthi Prithivirajan, Head of ASEAN & IN Solution Architecture, Neo4j
Get an inside look at the latest Neo4j innovations that enable relationship-driven intelligence at scale. Learn more about the newest cloud integrations and product enhancements that make Neo4j an essential choice for developers building apps with interconnected data and generative AI.
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxdanishmna97
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1DianaGray10
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...Zilliz
This talk will give hands-on advice on building RAG applications with an open-source Milvus database deployed as a docker container. We will also introduce the integration of Milvus with Snowpark Container Services.
44. References
Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice. British Journal of Social
Psychology, 44, 181-199.
Arminen, I. (2004). Second stories: The salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics
Anonymous. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 319-347.
Atkinson, J.M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Part II. Preference organization. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.),
Structures of Social Action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 53-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B.S. (2005). Institutional discourse and interlanguage pragmatics research. In K.
Bardovi-Harlig & B.S. Hartford (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk (pp. 7-36).
Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clifton, J. (2006). A conversation analytical approach to business communication. Journal of Business
Communication, 43, 202-219.
Clifton, J. (2009). Beyond taxonomies of influence. “Doing” influence and making decisions in management team
meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 57-79.
Coupland, J. (2000). Introduction: Sociolinguistic perspectives on small talk. In. J. Coupland (Ed.), Small Talk (pp.131). London: Pearson Education Limited.
Coupland, J. (2003). Small talk: Social functions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 1-6.
Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., Henwood, K., & Wiemann, J. (1988). Elderly self-disclosure: Interactional and
intergroup issue. Language & Communication, 8, 109-133.
Coupland, N. & Ylänne-McEwen, V. (2000). Talk about the weather: small talk, leisure talk and the travel industry. In
J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk. (pp. 163-182). London: Pearson Education Limited.
Cozby, P.C. (1973). Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological bulletin, 79, 73-91.
Derlega, V.J, Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S.T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park, California: Sage
Publications.
Downes, M., Hemmasi, M., Graf, L., Lane, K., & Huff, L. (2002). The propensity to trust: A comparative study of
United States and Japanese managers. International Journal of Management, 19, 614-621.
Drew, P. (2005). Conversation analysis. In K.L. Fitch, & R.E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social
interaction (pp. 71-102). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work:
Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eggins, S. & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.
Farber, B.A. (2006). Self-disclosure in psychotherapy. New York: Guildford Press.
Farber, B.A., Berano, K.C., & Capobiano, J.A. (2004). Clients’ perceptions of the process and consequences of selfdisclosure in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 340-346.
Galarneau, D., & Morissette, R. (2004). Immigrants settling for less? Statistics Canada – Catalogue no. 75-001-XIE.
Retrieved from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-001-x/10604/6921-eng.pdf
Galarneau, D., & Morissette, R. (2008). Immigrants’ education and required job skills. Statistics Canada – Catalogue
no. 75-001-X. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-001-x/2008112/pdf/10766-eng.pdf
Gilmore, J. (2009). The 2008 Canadian immigrant labour market: Analysis of quality of employment. Statistics Canada
– Catalogue no. 71-606-X, no.5. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/71-606-x/71-606-x2009001eng.pdf
Gunnarsson, B-L. (2009). Professional discourse. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Hargie, O. (2011). Skilled interpersonal communication research, theory and practice (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
45. Hargie, O., & Dickson, D. (2004). Skilled interpersonal communication research, theory and practice (4th ed.). New
York: Routledge.
Hawthorne, N. (1876). Passages from the French and Italian note-books of Nathanial Hawthorne. Boston: J. R.
Osgood and Company. Retrieved July 15, 2012 from http://go.utlib.ca/cat/4813969
Heritage, J. (1998). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing distinctive turn-taking systems. In S.
Cmerjrková, J. Hoffmannová, O. Müllerová, & J. Svetlá (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of
IADA (International Association for Dialog Analysis) (pp. 3-17). Tubingen: Niemeyer.
Heritage, J. (2001). Goffman, Garfinkel and conversation analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S.J. Yates (Eds.),
Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp.47-56). London: Sage Publications.
Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K.L Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of
language and social interaction (pp.103-147). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Heritage, J. (2009). Conversation analysis as social theory. In B. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social
theory (pp. 300-320). Oxford: Blackwell.
Heritage, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: Practices and methods. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Issues
of theory, method and practice (pp. 208-230). London: Sage. Retrieved from
http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/heritage/Site/Publications_files/CA_PRACTICES_AND_METHODS.pd
f
Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: Interaction, identities, and institutions. Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing.
Hill, C.E., & Knox, S. (2001). Self-disclosure. Psychotherapy, 38, 413-417.
Holmes, J. (2000a). Talking English from 9 to 5: challenges for ESL learners at work. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 10, 125-140.
Holmes, J. (2000b). Doing collegiality and keeping control at work. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk. (pp. 32-61).
London: Pearson Education Limited.
Holmes, J. (2000c). Victoria University of Wellington’s Language in Workplace Project: an overview. Language in the
Workplace Occasional Papers, 1. Retrieved from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/lwp/docs/ops/op1.pdf.
Holmes, J. (2005). When small talk is a big deal: Sociolinguistic challenges in the workplace. In M. Long (Ed.),
Second language needs analysis (pp. 344-372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, J. (2005). Why tell stories? Contrasting themes and identities in the narratives of Maori and Pakeha women
and men. In S. F. Kiesling & C. B. Paulston (Eds.), Intercultural discourse and communication. The essential
readings (pp. 110-134). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Holmes, J. (2006). Workplace narratives, professional identity and relational practice. In A. de Fina, D. Schiffrin, & M.
Bamberg (Eds.), Discourse and identity (pp. 166-187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes J., & Riddiford, N. (2011). Professional and personal identity at work: achieving a synthesis through
intercultural workplace talk. Retrieved from http://www.immi.se/intercultural/nr22/holmes.htm
Holmes, J., & Schnurr, S. (2005). Politeness, humor and gender in the workplace: negotiating norms and identifying
contestation. Journal of Politeness Research, 1, 121-149.
Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace. London: Longman.
Holtgraves, T. (1990). The language of self-disclosure. In H. Giles, & W.P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language
and social psychology (pp. 190-207). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Innes, B. (2010). “Well, that’s why I asked the question sir”: Well as a discourse marker in court. Language in Society,
39, 95-117.
Jamandre, N.K.F., & Arce, R.T. (2011). Self-disclosure and work relationships of call center agents with their coemployees. Journal of US-China public administration, 8, 990-1003.
46. Jaworski, A. (2000). Silence and small talk. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk. (pp. 110-132). London: Pearson
Education Limited.
Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the
organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219-248). New York: Academic Press, Inc.
Jefferson, C. (1984). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens ‘Yeah’ and ‘Mm hm’. Papers
in Linguistics, 17, 197-216.
Joseph, B.D. (2003). The Editor’s Department: Reviewing our contents. Language, 79, 461-463.
Jourard, S.M. (1964). The transparent self: self-disclosure and well-being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Jourard, S.M. (1971). Self-disclosure. An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Wiley.
Jourard, S.M., & Jaffe, P.E. (1970). Influence of an interviewer’s disclosure on the self-disclosing behavior of
interviewees. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 17, 252-257.
Jourard, S.M., & Lasakow, P. (1958). Some factors in self-disclosure. The Journal of Abnormal and Social
Psychology, 56, 91-98.
Kitzinger, C. (2000). Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 163-193.
Kitzinger, C. (2009). Doing gender. A conversation analytic perspective. Gender & Society, 23, 94-98.
Koester, A. (2004). Relational sequences in workplace genres. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1405-1428.
Koester, A. (2005). A corpus-based study of politeness and solidarity in workplace conversations. Tesol Forum: 25,
Retrieved from
http://www.tesol.org//s_tesol/article.asp?SID=1&NID=2857&DID=3601&VID=142&CIDQS=&Taxonomy=Fal
se&specialSearch=False
Kuiper, K., & Flindall, M. (2000). Social rituals, formulaic speech and small talk at the supermarket checkout. In J.
Coupland (Ed.), Small talk. (pp. 183-207). London: Pearson Education Limited.
Labov, W. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society, 1, 97-120.
Ladegaard, Hans J. (2011). ‘Doing power’ at work: Responding to male and female management styles in a global
business corporation. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 4-19.
Language in the Workplace Project (2010). Retrieved from http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/lwp/
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Laver, J. (1975). Communicative functions of phatic communion. In A. Kendon, R. Harris, & M. Ritchie Key (Eds.),
Organization of behaviour in face-to-face interaction (pp. 215-238). The Hague: Mouton & Co.
Levinson, S. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in
institutional settings (pp. 66-100). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C.K. Ogden & I.A. Richards (Eds.), The
Meaning of Meaning (pp. 296-336). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World Inc.
Markee, N. (2011). Doing, and justifying doing, avoidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 602-615.
Maynard, D.W., & Hudak, P.L. (2008). Small talk, high stakes: Interactional disattentiveness in the context of
prosocial doctor-patient interaction. Language in Society, 37, 661-688.
McCarthy, M. (2000). Mutually captive audiences: small talk and the genre of close-contact service encounters. In J.
Coupland (Ed.), Small talk. (pp. 84-109). London: Pearson Education Limited.
Meierford, C. (2000). Interpreting successful lingua franca interaction: An analysis of non-native-/non-native small talk
conversations in English. Retrieved from Linguistik online 5, 1/00. http://www.linguistikonline.de/1_00/MEIERKOR.HTM
Mirivel, J.C., & Tracy, K. (2005). Premeeting talk: An organizationally crucial form of talk. Research of Language and
Social Interaction, 38, 1-34.
47. Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in
the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 501-518.
Mori, J. (2007). Border crossings? Exploring the intersection of second language acquisition, conversation analysis and
foreign language pedagogy. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 849-862.
OED (2012a). Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from
http://www.oed.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/view/Entry/98353?redirectedFrom=interstice#eid
OED (2012b). Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from
http://www.oed.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/view/Entry/142290?rskey=YeBSpr&result=5&isAdvanced=f
alse#
Padilla Cruz, M. (2007). Phatic utterances and the communication of social information: A relevance-theoretic
approach. In P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, M. Padilla Cruz, R. Gómez Morón, & L. Fernández Amaya (Eds.),
Studies in intercultural, cognitive and social pragmatics (pp 112-129). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars
Publishing.
Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy dialectics of disclosure. Albany, New York: State of University of New
York Press.
Polletta, F., Chen, P.C.B., Gardner, B.G., & Motes, A. (2011). The sociology of storytelling. Annual Review of
Sociology, 37, 109-130.
Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: “Limited access: as a “fishing” device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186-198.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.
In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.) Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Power, J.L. et al. (2011). Acceptability of workplace bullying: A comparative study on six continents. Journal of
Business Research. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.018.
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: the study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pudlinski, C. (2005). Doing empathy and sympathy: caring responses to troubles telling on a peer support line.
Discourse studies, 7, 267-288.
Richards, J.C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). (Eds.) Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics.
Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited.
Richards, K. (2006). ‘Being the teacher’: Identity and classroom conversation. Applied Linguistics, 27, 51-77.
Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.),
Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337-353). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1984a). Notes on methodology. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.). Structures in social action: Studies in
conversation analysis (pp. 21-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1984b). On doing “being ordinary”. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.). Structures in social action:
Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 413-429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1992a). April 24: Second stories. In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Lectures on conversation (Vol. I & II) (pp. 764772). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Sacks, H. (1992b). Lecture 5: ‘First’ and ‘second’ stories; Topical coherence; Storing and recalling experiences. In G.
Jefferson (Ed.), Lectures on conversation (Vol. I & II) (pp. 249-268). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for
conversations. Language, 50, 696-735.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.) Erving Goffman:
Exploring the interaction order (pp. 89-135). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in
conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295-1345.
48. Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Turn Organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction: In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff,
& S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of
Sociology, 102, 161-216
Schegloff, E.A. (1997c). “Narrative analysis”: Thirty years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 97-106.
Schegloff, E.A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language,
and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.) Roots of human sociality:
Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70-96). London: Berg.
Schegloff, E.A. (2007). Sequential organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis 1. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E.A. (2009). A practice for (re-)exiting a sequence: And/but/so + uh(m) + silence. In B. Fraser, & K. Turner
(Eds.), Language in life and a life in language: Jacob Mey – A Festschrift (pp. 365-374).
Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H., (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in
conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, VIII, 289-327.
Schegloff, E.A., Koshik, I., Jacoby, S., & Olsher, D. (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual
Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 3-31.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, K.P. (1988). Small talk: Analysing phatic discourse. Marburg/Lahn: Hitzeroth.
Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis and language learning. Language Teaching, 38, 165-187.
Sidnell, J. (2010) Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Smith, V., Collard, P., Nicolson, P., & Bayne, R. (2012). Key concepts in counseling and psychotherapy: A critical A-Z
guide to theory. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
Statistics Canada. (2009). College and university graduates with low earnings in Canada – Demographic and labour
market characteristics. In Education matters: Insights on education, learning and training in Canada. Vol. 6,
No. 2. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-004-x/2009002/article/10897-eng.htm
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation.
Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 31-57.
Stokoe, E. (2009). “I've got a girlfriend”: Police officers doing self-disclosure in their interrogations of suspects
Narrative Inquiry, 19, 154-182.
.
Stricker, G. & Fisher, M. (1990). Self-disclosure in the therapeutic relationship. New York: Plenum Publishing.
Stubbe, M. (2001). From office to production line: Collecting data for the Wellington Language in the Workplace
Project. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers, Number 2. Retrieved from
http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/lwp/docs/ops/op2.pdf
Subramanian, G. (2007). The final word on small talk. Negotiation, November, 8. Retrieved from
http://www.pon.harvard.edu/?p=10493
Tardy, C., & Dindia, K. (1997) Self-disclosure. In O. Hargie (Ed.), The handbook of communication skills (pp. 213235) (2nd ed.), London: Routledge.
Tarone, E. (2005). English for specific purposes and interlanguage pragmatics. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & B.S. Hartford
(Eds.), Interlanguage Pragmatics: Exploring Institutional Talk (pp. 157-173). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Tracy, K., & Naughton, J.M. (2000). Institutional identity-work: a better lens. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 6283). London: Pearson Education Limited.
49. Walsh, I.P. (2007). Small talk is ‘Big Talk’ in clinical discourse: Appreciating the value of conversation in SLP clinical
interactions. Topics in Language Disorders, 27, 24-36.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D.H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151.
Williams, M. (1988). Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: Is there anything in common?
Applied Linguistics, 9, 45-58.
Wittgenstein, L., (1953/2009). Philosophical Investigations. (G.E.M. Anscombe, P.E.M. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Trans.).
(4th ed.) P.M.S. Hacker & J. Schulte (Eds.).West Sussex, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Wong, J., (2002). “Applying” conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second
language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 37-60.
Wynn, R., & Wynn, W. (2006). Empathy as an interactionally achieved phenomenon in psychotherapy. Characteristics
of some conversational resources. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1385-1398.
Žegarac, V., & Clark, B. (1999). Phatic interpretations and phatic communication. Journal of Linguistics, 35, 321-346.