Thrilled to announce I've been awarded Fist Place in Roger William University's 2017 Advanced Writing Contest for my policy report “Children & Lunch-Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain."
Lunch-Shaming in America is not often talked about or understood, but has become an increasing problem for the esteem and development of America's children. Children are being wrongfully stigmatized for their family's finances by being denied the same lunch as their peers, receiving a stamp saying "Need Lunch Money", or being forced to perform chores for their lunch.
School lunch companies and school administrations should not be able to stigmatize 2nd, 3rd, 4th graders for something their parents need to deal with.
If any of this makes you sad/angry/annoyed, please feel free to read my report, Children & Lunch Shaming: America's Neglected Stain, and let me know your thoughts!
Women and prescription on opioids is focus of this research paper. The author examines the history of prescription opioids and their affect on women in the United States. The author also discusses that state of the prescription opioids epidemic as well as the policies and regulations trying to address it.
The report card highlights five aspects of child well-being: economic security, early childhood, K–12 education, permanency and stability, and health and safety. They were chosen because they provide the strongest indicators of child well-being. Together, they illustrate the path the life of an American child from birth through adolescence, and their transition into adulthood.
Women and prescription on opioids is focus of this research paper. The author examines the history of prescription opioids and their affect on women in the United States. The author also discusses that state of the prescription opioids epidemic as well as the policies and regulations trying to address it.
The report card highlights five aspects of child well-being: economic security, early childhood, K–12 education, permanency and stability, and health and safety. They were chosen because they provide the strongest indicators of child well-being. Together, they illustrate the path the life of an American child from birth through adolescence, and their transition into adulthood.
The Teachers Unions’ Fight for Universal PreschoolJames Dellinger
This summer, Congress will
consider reauthorization of the 2002 No
Child Left Behind Act, the Bush
Administration’s centerpiece education
legislation. This time around, Sen. Edward
Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Rep.
George Miller (D- California) are in the
driver’s seat. What kind of spoils will they
give their teachers union allies—perhaps
funding for “universal preschool”?
The school choice journey: Parents experiencing more than improved test scoresFLE Liberdade de Educação
Most of the existing literature on parental school choice misses the crucial story about why parents seek it and what it can do for them from a comprehensive perspective. Parents do not pursue student test-score gains so much as they seek safety and character development for their child. For themselves, parents view school choice as a pathway to dignity, respect, and empowerment.
Ghost wrote an op-ed for two child care activists -- one an early childhood educator and mom in New Mexico; the other a mom advocate in Michigan -- to share their stories and connect the issue to the upcoming 2020 election.
Novel Communication Tools: Using Text4Baby & Just In Time Parenting to Meet the Needs of Parents WEBINAR
Location: https://learn.extension.org/events/1459
Presenters of this 2 hour webinar will highlight how parents today are less likely to attend traditional parenting programs, provide research showing that parents are increasingly seeking information online, through social media and mobile devices and promote the use of two FREE, effective and innovative resources that can meet the needs of parents with young children.
The Adoption and Safe Families Act or ASFA (1997) is focus of this policy analysis paper. The author provides a thorough policy analysis of ASFA and its negative affects on African American families. Policy history, statistics, and recommendations, is also discussed.
2 0 1 6 S t a t e Fa c t S h e e t sChild Care in America.docxvickeryr87
2 0 1 6 S t a t e Fa c t S h e e t s
Child Care in America:
Every week in the United States, child care providers care for nearly 11
million children younger than age 5 whose parents are working. On
average, these children spend 36 hours a week in child care, and one
quarter (nearly 3 million) are in multiple child care arrangements due to
the traditional and nontraditional working hours of their parents.1
Research has continually illustrated the importance of quality early
experiences in achieving good health, especially within the most
vulnerable populations. Families, child care providers and state and
federal policymakers share responsibility for the safety and wellbeing
of children while they are in child care settings. Basic state
requirements and oversight help lay the foundation necessary to
protect children and promote their healthy development while in child
care.
The Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) program
serves approximately 1.45 million children annually in communities
across the country. CCDBG is the primary federal grant program that
provides child care assistance for families and funds child care quality
initiatives. Funds are administered to states in formula block grants,
and states use the grants to subsidize child care for low-income
working families.
In November 2014, President Barack Obama signed S.1086, the Child
Care and Development Block Grant Act of 2014 into law. The new law
includes several measures focused on quality, including requiring
states to:
Promote quality child care by increasing activities to improve
the care, enhancing states’ ability to train providers and develop
safer and more effective child care services.
Strengthen health and safety requirements in child care
programs and providers.
Improve access to child care by expanding eligibility for
participating families and helping families connect with quality
programs that meet their needs by enhancing consumer
education, providing greater options for quality child care and
working to ensure continuity of care, essential for both the well-
being and stability of a child.2
With the new federal child care measures set to take effect, states are
rapidly building, evaluating, and changing their early care and
education quality focused systems (Quality Rating and Improvement
System (QRIS), professional development, licensing and standards).
Implementation of the new regulations must align with these efforts for
sustainability and maximum impact.
Over the past several years, Child Care Aware® of America has
surveyed and conducted focus groups with parents of young children,
grandparents, national child advocacy organizations, and state and
local Child Care Resource and Referral (CCR&R) agencies. Those
conversations underscored that child care is an essential building block
1 U.S.
The Teachers Unions’ Fight for Universal PreschoolJames Dellinger
This summer, Congress will
consider reauthorization of the 2002 No
Child Left Behind Act, the Bush
Administration’s centerpiece education
legislation. This time around, Sen. Edward
Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Rep.
George Miller (D- California) are in the
driver’s seat. What kind of spoils will they
give their teachers union allies—perhaps
funding for “universal preschool”?
The school choice journey: Parents experiencing more than improved test scoresFLE Liberdade de Educação
Most of the existing literature on parental school choice misses the crucial story about why parents seek it and what it can do for them from a comprehensive perspective. Parents do not pursue student test-score gains so much as they seek safety and character development for their child. For themselves, parents view school choice as a pathway to dignity, respect, and empowerment.
Ghost wrote an op-ed for two child care activists -- one an early childhood educator and mom in New Mexico; the other a mom advocate in Michigan -- to share their stories and connect the issue to the upcoming 2020 election.
Novel Communication Tools: Using Text4Baby & Just In Time Parenting to Meet the Needs of Parents WEBINAR
Location: https://learn.extension.org/events/1459
Presenters of this 2 hour webinar will highlight how parents today are less likely to attend traditional parenting programs, provide research showing that parents are increasingly seeking information online, through social media and mobile devices and promote the use of two FREE, effective and innovative resources that can meet the needs of parents with young children.
The Adoption and Safe Families Act or ASFA (1997) is focus of this policy analysis paper. The author provides a thorough policy analysis of ASFA and its negative affects on African American families. Policy history, statistics, and recommendations, is also discussed.
2 0 1 6 S t a t e Fa c t S h e e t sChild Care in America.docxvickeryr87
2 0 1 6 S t a t e Fa c t S h e e t s
Child Care in America:
Every week in the United States, child care providers care for nearly 11
million children younger than age 5 whose parents are working. On
average, these children spend 36 hours a week in child care, and one
quarter (nearly 3 million) are in multiple child care arrangements due to
the traditional and nontraditional working hours of their parents.1
Research has continually illustrated the importance of quality early
experiences in achieving good health, especially within the most
vulnerable populations. Families, child care providers and state and
federal policymakers share responsibility for the safety and wellbeing
of children while they are in child care settings. Basic state
requirements and oversight help lay the foundation necessary to
protect children and promote their healthy development while in child
care.
The Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) program
serves approximately 1.45 million children annually in communities
across the country. CCDBG is the primary federal grant program that
provides child care assistance for families and funds child care quality
initiatives. Funds are administered to states in formula block grants,
and states use the grants to subsidize child care for low-income
working families.
In November 2014, President Barack Obama signed S.1086, the Child
Care and Development Block Grant Act of 2014 into law. The new law
includes several measures focused on quality, including requiring
states to:
Promote quality child care by increasing activities to improve
the care, enhancing states’ ability to train providers and develop
safer and more effective child care services.
Strengthen health and safety requirements in child care
programs and providers.
Improve access to child care by expanding eligibility for
participating families and helping families connect with quality
programs that meet their needs by enhancing consumer
education, providing greater options for quality child care and
working to ensure continuity of care, essential for both the well-
being and stability of a child.2
With the new federal child care measures set to take effect, states are
rapidly building, evaluating, and changing their early care and
education quality focused systems (Quality Rating and Improvement
System (QRIS), professional development, licensing and standards).
Implementation of the new regulations must align with these efforts for
sustainability and maximum impact.
Over the past several years, Child Care Aware® of America has
surveyed and conducted focus groups with parents of young children,
grandparents, national child advocacy organizations, and state and
local Child Care Resource and Referral (CCR&R) agencies. Those
conversations underscored that child care is an essential building block
1 U.S.
C ommentariesEnding Childhood Poverty in America 0c—Mari.docxjasoninnes20
C ommentaries
Ending Childhood Poverty in America 0c—
Marian Wright Edelman
From the Children’s Defense Fund, Washington, DC
The author reports no conflicts of interest.
Address correspondence to Marian Wright Edelman, Children’s Defense Fund, 25 E St NW, Washington, DC 20001 (e-mail: [email protected]
childrensdefense.org).
A cademic Pediatrics 2016;16:S6-S7
SARAH IS 3 years old. She and her 6-year-old brother,
Bryce, are inseparable except when it’s time for him to visit
the summer food program that provides meals at a school
near their Ohio home for children who otherwise would
go hungry. Sarah’s too young to make the trip. One morn
ing after Bryce had his fill of food for the day he made a
detour before heading home. He walked to the trash cans
and began rummaging through food others threw away.
Winnie Brewer, the Food Services Supervisor in Marion
City Schools, noticed the little boy and tapped him on
the shoulder to ask why he was sifting through the garbage.
“My little sister,” he explained. “She's hungry.” Bringing
her leftover food was the only way he knew to help.
“We run into a lot of situations where kids will come and
say they have younger siblings at home,” Brewer says.
“They always want to know if they can take something
back.” After Brewer spoke with Bryce, staff members fol
lowed him home with a care package for little Sarah. This
was a temporary solution to a huge problem Brewer
worries about every day. “Until we see that child digging
food out of a trash can, it doesn’t hit home,” Brewer
says. “When it does, you know you have to do something.”
Sarah and Bryce (not their real names) are far from
alone. Hunger is only one of the dangerous risks of growing
up poor in rich America. Despite 6 years of economic re
covery, children remain the poorest group in America
and the younger they are the poorer they are. The United
States has the second highest child poverty rate among
35 industrialized countries despite having the largest econ
omy in the world. More than 1 in 5 children in America
(21.1%) were living in poverty in 2014, compared with
13.5% of people ages 18 to 64 years and 10% of those
aged 65 years and older. Nearly 1 in 4 children younger
than the age of 5 years (23.8%) are poor during some of
the years of greatest brain development. Seventy percent
of the 15.5 million poor children in America were children
of color— who already constitute most of our nation’s
youngest children and will be the majority of all the chil
dren in our nation by 2020.
Poverty hurts children, creates opportunity gaps that can
last a lifetime, and hurts the nation’s economy. The toxic
stress of early poverty stunts children’s emotional and
physical development and increases the likelihood of
poor academic achievement and dropping out of high
school, which then increases the likelihood of unemploy
ment, economic hardship, and involvement in the criminal
justice system as an adult. These effects ...
This social policy research paper focuses on Child Welfare In the United States. The in the paper, the author gives a thorough history of the Child Welfare System as we know it. Trends and impacts on vulnerable populations within our society is also discussed.
Omar FallatahEnglish 101 Mr. Andrew Vanden BosschePove.docxhopeaustin33688
Omar Fallatah
English 101
Mr. Andrew Vanden Bossche
Poverty has negatively affected the Education in America
There are almost 2,7 million
The most people who have effected by poverty are low income.
They extremely have a hard time to build their future. According to the New York Times, “Another 2.6 million people slipped into poverty in the United States last year. According to the Census Bureau reported , and the number of Americans living below the official poverty line, 46.2 million people, was the highest number in the 52 years the bureau has been publishing figures on it. And in new signs of distress among the middle class, median household incomes fell last year to levels last seen in 1996.Lower income families who have a large number of children will accord this problem .The households can't cover the home needing. They have not the all ability to cover the family needing. There are many issues that really impact these people. There is so much stuff for lower income to cover in united state. They must to buy car insurance, health insurance, school tuition and others households needing."
By the year 2020, the majority of students in America's public schools will be living in circumstances that will categorize them as at risk of educational failure. A person's education is closely linked to the individual's life chances, income, and well being"
(Battle and Lewis 2002). Moreover, in the last ten years, there was growing a huge gap between the top income class and the less income class
There are three issues which are the most effected the education in America. They are food supply, The lower income people can't provide enough food for themselves. The households are having a hard time to provide en enough food for their children. Drop-off in the reach of U.S. summer nutrition programs in 2010 and ongoing budget-cutting at state and local levels suggest that many schoolchildren in the United States will face another summer of hunger this year. According to a new report from the Food Research and Action Center, despite record numbers of children receiving free and reduced-price meals during the 2009-10 school years, participation in federal summer nutrition programs fell nationally in 2010. FRAC reports that in July 2010 only 15 children received nutrition aid for every 100 low-income students who received lunch during the 2009-10 school years. The food supply is really affected the kids to be success in their school. The way to solve this issue is must provide enough food that could be useful to a void . " One in eight Americans — 37 million — received emergency food help last year, up 46% from 2005, the nation's largest hunger-relief group reports today. Children are hit particularly hard, according to the report by Feeding America, a network of 203 food banks nationwide. One in five children, 14 million, received food from soup kitchens, food pantries and other agencies, up from 9 million in 2005, the year of the group's la.
Similar to Children & Lunch-Shaming in America (12)
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Children & Lunch-Shaming in America
1. Children & Lunch-Shaming:
America’s Neglected Stain
Written by
Meghan Smith
Written For
The Committee on Education and the Workforce
United States House of Representatives
Submitted to RWU Advanced Writing Competition
36 Bayview Avenue Professor Melvyn Topf
Bristol, Rhode Island 02809 Writing on Law and Public Policy
Msmith607@g.rwu.edu WTNG 430.01
845.825.1239 Fall 2017
ID 1100070
2. 2Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain
Meghan A. Smith
36 Bayview Avenue
Bristol, Rhode Island 02809
January 29, 2018
Congresswoman Virginia Foxx
U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce
2176 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
To Chairwoman Virginia Foxx:
Attached is the report “Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain”. This report is
written for all of the children who are being bullied in school and teased for their family’s
financial burdens. This report is for the children who are unable to focus on their work because
the stamp on the back of their hand reminds them that tomorrow they may not get to eat when
the lunch bell rings.
In this report, you will find reasons as to why this committee should pay attention to the shaming
our children are enduring. It is no longer an issue that affects a few families and schools, children
across the country have to go through it at some point in their school years.
This report will be divided into six enlightening sections; executive summary, introduction,
overview, the effects that lunch shaming has on our children, how we should eliminate lunch
shaming, and ending with final remarks.
I hope that these findings will leave the committee inspired to help eliminate the embarrassment
and burden that these children are feeling from actions being done within their own schools; a
place they should be eager to grow and learn, not stigmatized and branded.
I thank you for your time and I hope you will make this ongoing issue a top priority for the
benefit of America’s children.
Sincerely,
Meghan A. Smith
3. 3Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain
Table of Contents
Letter of Transmittal…………………………………………………………………2
Executive Summary………………………………………………………………….4
Introduction………………………………………………………….……………….5
Overview of the Anti-Lunch Shaming Act…………………….…………………….5
Lunch Shaming & the Effects on Children……………………………………..…....6
Bullying…………………………………………………………………...….7
Lack of Focus……………………………………………………………..….8
Ridding the Country of Lunch Shaming…………………………………………...…9
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………10
References……………………………………………………………………………11
4. 4Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain
Executive Summary
The report “Children and Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain”, will discuss the
implications lunch shaming has on children across the United States. Lunch shaming is the act of
publically identifying a child who cannot afford to pay for their meal or whose parents are in
debt to the school food authority. Shaming happens based on policies set by the school food
authorities by stamping the child’s arm, giving them a bracelet, forcing them to perform chores
to compensate the meal or throwing out the lunch entirely and replacing the served meal with a
smaller and noticeably less food. These acts leave the child stigmatized, embarrassed, and
vulnerable to bullies, ultimately disrupting their focus in the classroom.
The Anti-Lunch Shaming Act put forth to congress by Representative Michelle Grisham
of New Mexico will help get rid of these unnecessary tactics of shaming children and will assist
schools in thinking of more practical and effective ways to contact the child’s parent or guardian.
The Anti-Lunch Shaming Act is currently sitting in the Committee on Education and the
Workforce under the supervision of the Head of Committee Virginia Foxx of North Carolina
with a total of 131 cosponsors from both parties.
If passed, the Anti-Lunch Shaming Act will keep children who cannot afford their lunch
from being publically stigmatized amongst their peers and keep their focus on what really
matters, learning in the classroom.
5. 5Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain
Introduction
Children across the country are being stigmatized by their school cafeterias before,
during, and after their lunch period. Lunch is a time for students to take a mental and physical
break from their long school day, however for many children, lunch can be the most stressful
time of the day.
Over five million children across the United States are members of families who cannot
afford to send their children to school with a lunchbox or enough money to buy a school lunch.
When a child is in school, they should be concerned with one thing; learning. By stigmatizing
them, these schools are pulling them away from their job of being students and causing all kinds
of present and future problems. Children who are lunch shamed are more vulnerable to bullying
and increases their lack of focus in the classroom. Our nation can do better for these young
developing children; we can and will put an end to lunch shaming.
This report will showcase an overview of the proposed bill that will help the children
being shamed, The Anti Lunch Shaming Act. We will discuss the current status of the bill, an
explanation of the importance of the bill, as well as the success stories from schools and states
across the country who have gotten rid of lunch shaming in their schools. By the end of this
report, readers should understand just how important it is that we rid our schools of lunch
shaming practices.
Overview of the Anti-Lunch Shaming Act of 2017
The introduction of Bill H.R. 2401, The Anti-Lunch Shaming Act of 2017, is a long
awaited act of support for the children who are being shamed by institutions around the country.
The act strives to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act in order to prevent
the stigmatization of children who are unable to pay for meals. The National School Lunch Act
was made law on June 4, 1946, and created the National Lunch Program which allows families
to apply for discounted or free lunch for their children, depending on their family’s financial
status. The National School Lunch program helps over 30.4 million children in the United States
alone but there are still countless number of families whose income just barely misses the cutoff
line for assistance (USDA, 2017). These children are the ones who feel the ongoing effects of
lunch shaming, and they are the children this bill could benefit the most.
The Anti-Lunch Shaming Act was put forth by Representative Michelle Lujan Grisham of
New Mexico along with the support of her colleagues, Representative Rodney Davis of Illinois,
Bobby Scott of Virginia, Ms. DeLauro and Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico. The act covers
any student who:
I. Is involved in the National School Breakfast or National School Lunch Programs
established under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act
II. Does not have funds to pay for lunch or breakfast
III. Has outstanding credit that was extended by a school food authority
6. 6Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain
The Anti-Lunch Shaming Act states that these covered students are not to be stigmatized by
any authority in their school for the lack of funds for meals. The school food authorities shall not
permit:
I. The public identification or stigmatization of a covered child such as by requiring the
child to wear a wristband or stamp on their arm
II. The child perform chores or any other activity that is not normally required of
students
III. Disposing the lunch that the child was given, and replacing it with a lesser lunch or
breakfast
The final section of the proposed bill discusses the communication options for a school food
authority and the parent or guardian, alleviating the involvement of the child. A school food
authority shall require that “any communication relating to an outstanding credit shall be directed
to a parent or guardian, not the covered child”. Also, the food authority may give the child a
letter to deliver to their parent or guardian, however, the letters are not allowed to be distributed
in a manner that stigmatizes the covered child. Finally, the bill ends with the suggestion for the
school food authority to make better use of today’s technology when attempting to communicate
with the parent or guardian.
Current Status. The Anti-Lunch Shaming Act has been proposed by Congresswoman
Michelle Grisham on May 8, 2017. Currently, it has been introduced and referred to the
Committee on Education and the Workforce, to whom this report is addressed to. It has been
sitting in the committees grasp for over seven months and has not yet been reviewed by head
chairwoman, Virginia Foxx of North Carolina. This is known based on an email that was
received after contacting the congresswoman for more information regarding the bill. Foxx
stated, “So far this congress, thousands of legislative measures have been introduced in the
House of Representatives alone and I have not had the opportunity to review H.R. 2401.”
Since it is a known concept that bills that remain in committee for an extended period of time
usually get ignored and pushed out, it is the goal of this report to prove to Congresswoman Foxx
and her colleagues on the committee of this bills importance for children across America.
Lunch Shaming & the Effects on Children
The practice of lunch shaming is widespread and cannot be contained to one area in the
country. In a 2014 report from the Department of Agriculture, researchers found that nearly half
of the school districts in the United States use shaming tactics of some sort to guilt the parents
into paying their bill. Forty-five percent withheld the hot meal and gives the child a cold
sandwich, while three percent deny the child food entirely (Siegel, 2017). The USDA is calling
schools to stop “embarrassing” and “singling out” students who don’t have enough money for
their lunch and breakfasts, however it is obvious that their request have been swiftly ignored
(Long, 2017).
In Albuquerque, New Mexico, before their Hunger-Free Students Bill of Rights Act was
established, Hazel Compton, age 12, recalls “They would use the sandwich like a threat. Like, ‘If
7. 7Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain
you don’t want it, your parents have to pay’…” (Siegel, 2017). In Pennsylvania, a school lunch
worker quit when she was forced to follow the schools protocol that required her to take the
child’s food away from him due to an unpaid bill. While it is understood that schools need to
receive payment for these meals, it is wrong to involve the child so much in the process.
The importance of this bill is evident; our children are being treated poorly and without
consideration for their well-being. The school food authorities are using them as pawns to get to
their parent or guardian, but they are not pawns, and should never be treated as such – they are
innocent children that have been unnecessarily brought into an adult mess. School
communication regarding lunch bills should be directed to the parent or guardian of the child,
and not the child in any way. The financial worries of their family is not their burden to bear as
such a young age. By branding these students with stamps or bracelets, or giving them obviously
different meals from their peers, the schools are continuously ostracizing and stigmatizing them.
School is a place for them to learn and grow, both academically and socially, and these shaming
actions hurt their esteem, focus, and mental and physical health. When a child and their family
are both insecure in food and finances, it can cause or further escalate an array of behavioral
problems including: fighting, hyperactivities, aggression, anxiety, mood swings and bullying
(Feeding America, 2017). Alleviating lunch shaming in our schools across the country could
diminish the gap children feel and see among their peers, creating a positive and equal
environment for all students.
Lunch Shaming & Bullying
No one can say that they have never once experienced bullying – whether they were the
bully or were bullied, this concept is so intricately woven into our society that it is inevitable one
should encounter it. Bullying can come an all forms, whether it be traditional name calling and
physical altercations, or more modern ways such as cyber-bullying – an act that has come to
fruition due to cell phones and social media, and has affected younger and older generations
around the world. Bullying is seen in school and out of school, from older and younger students
and even adults and has shaped some children to become unstable and fragile, or some
independent and strong. However, most people can attest that majority of the time, bullying
damages people in ways they do not quite see or understand.
The school food authorities that stamp children, throw away their lunches, or hand out
letters in a demeaning way to those families are financially struggling are part of the problem.
The actions these authorities are taking are in fact not helping the system, but rather bullying
children and making them even more vulnerable to peer-bullying in schools all around the
country. According to researchers, “Higher age and better socio-economic differences between
classmates were risk factors associated with being a bully, while younger age and poorer socio-
economic conditions than classmates were associated with being a victim of bullying” (Chaux &
Castellanos, 2015). Research found that when a school society has strong hierarchies among
students based on their socio-economic status, there is more bullying against those with lower
economic status. These lunch shaming practices outright separate the children from their peers;
8. 8Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain
seeing a child with the lesser lunch creates an invisible gap between those who can afford a
normal lunch.
Caitlin Dolan, a seventh grader from Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, recalls a time when she
reached the cash register only to be denied her meal because her parents owed the school lunch
money, due to a miscommunication from the year before. “I was so embarrassed. It’s really
weird being denied food in front of everyone. They all talk about you…” (Siegel, 2017). Lunch
shaming is a form of bullying, and what is the most unsettling is that it is actions taken by adults.
By letting these authorities treat our students in this way, it creates an environment susceptible to
bullying for all students that are affected.
The long term effects of bullying caused by lunch shaming are something we as a country
and as a government can work to change by passing this bill. The initial affect that
embarrassment and bullying has on a child can continue to affect them for years to come. In a
New York Times article, parent Kerry Krepps says her son refuses to eat peanut butter
sandwiches to this day, because in middle school when students were unable to pay, they were
sent to a table in the middle of the cafeteria to make their own peanut butter sandwiches in front
of all their peers. Krepps said in the interview about her son, “The humiliation has persisted for
20 years. It shows how lasting these experiences can be” (Siegel, 2017).
Lunch Shaming & Lack of Focus
In addition to being outcaste and more vulnerable to bullies, being branded with lunch
shaming acts such as a bracelet or a stamp, or being given a much less fulfilling meal, can cause
lack of focus for the student for the rest of their school day from worry and hunger.
Knowing your own family is not financially stable is a hard burden to carry at a young
age. What makes it even harder, is knowing that the school lunch authorities are publically
exposing your family’s hardships to the rest of the school; students, teachers, faculty all have a
judgmental grasp on your family’s financial status. It is important for lawmakers to realize that
branding these children will draw their attention far away from the classroom and keep them
from being successful. How – when the child looks down and sees a stamp that says “I need
lunch money” on their forearm as they write in their workbook – will they be able to focus on the
learning?
In addition to the constant reminder the child receives, they may also be hungry from a
lack of sufficient fuel. It is typical that when a child cannot afford their lunch while at school,
that their meals at home are lacking as well. For many children, school meals are the only ones
they receive for the day. Food insecurity is a national problem, and when the only time to get a
nutritious meal for these kids is during the school day, how are we going to deny them that? For
many families that are food insecure, their children come to school already hungry, looking
forward to their lunch period, yet only to find out their balance is in the negatives and they have
no cash to pay for their meal. When given the alternate lunch of sometimes a cold cheese
sandwich or a bowl of fruit, they are expected to be fueled for the rest of the day – however most
are not. According to reports, school districts are feeding their students with adequate
9. 9Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain
replacements, however these replacement lunches are more like snacks, leaving the affected
child hungry. For the remainder of the day when they attempt to do work, a hungry child will
find their brain to be fatigued and weak, making it incredibly difficult to concentrate. For a child
who may need a hearty lunch to get through the day and to concentrate, it is unjust to deny them
what they need to succeed in the classroom.
Children are the future of our country; their success means our success. When a school
stigmatizes a child with these actions, they could be decimating the confidence and focus of a
potential lawyer, doctor, professor, or executive. Children deserve all the possibilities to succeed,
especially those who live impoverished lives. It is imperative that children are given all the
opportunities in school, and that starts with ending lunch shaming.
Ridding the Country of Lunch Shaming
The idea of getting rid of lunch shaming across America is very attainable. States such as
New Mexico, Texas, and California all have passed laws that help rid schools of these wrongful
acts. New Mexico launched the revolution with their law “Hunger Free Students Bill of Rights
Act”, leading California to initiate their “Child Hunger Prevention and Fair Treatment Act of
2017” and Texas’ Senate Bill #1566 which has integrated small but important aspects of getting
rid of lunch shaming. The success of these bills are a perfect example of the impact the Anti-
Lunch Shaming Act could have on schools and students around the country and how attainable it
is for states to find some way to get rid of these practices.
Individuals across America are also acting as white knights for our children; stepping in
and standing up for them, paying for them, with some parents or faculty members going as far as
raising thousands of dollars to cancel out the debts to keep schools from lunch shaming. In an
elementary school in Houston, Texas, special education teacher Chris Robinson saw a child
walking around the cafeteria salvaging scraps to eat for lunch. In the interview Robinson recalled
that “it took all his inner strength not to cry” (Long, 2017). From that eye opening experience,
Robinson created a GoFundMe page where he raised about $700 to assist some students who
found themselves in debt. Currently on the website there are over 30 accounts trying to raise
money to help kids and their families who are in lunch debt (Long, 2017).
In Seattle, Washington, after hearing numerous heartbreaking stories of children being
denied food, a third-graders father was dedicated to helping out in his son’s school. He found
that his son’s schools lunch debt was only $97.10, and felt he could do more. The father created
a GoFundMe page as well and continued to raise money, and after only a week, raised $23,738.
With that money, he cancelled out lunch debt in 99 schools in Seattle (Earl, 2017).
These stories are evidence that people care about these children, and want them to focus
on the important things like learning and growing, and not worry about being shamed. If these
hundreds and thousands of strangers are willing to help get rid of lunch shaming, why can’t our
government see the need as well?
While it is understood that the debt owed needs to be paid, it is the sole goal of the Anti-
Lunch Shaming Act to keep the children out of the communication process and says nothing
10. 10Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain
regarding the payment process, which is what makes this bill so unique. When people think of
lunch shaming and lunch money their heads automatically jump to the conclusion of payments
and free lunches etc. But when looking at the entire picture, we can help the most important
people in the shaming process, the students, by simply eliminating the stigmatizing ways of these
school food authorities.
Conclusion
Passing the Anti-Lunch Shaming Act will protect so many children from the harsh
realities they should not be expected to experience at such a young age. Finances, bills and
money should not be top of mind for an 8 year old, they should be excited for recess, making
new friends and the new book they will read in class.
Lunch shaming in America is unjust and completely preventable. The use of such tactics
like stamping and lunch replacements are barbaric and inconsiderate to child’s mental well-
being. Stigmatizing these children make them more vulnerable to bullying and also cause an
increasing lack of focus on their school work. Fixing this preventable issue should be a cause
that both parties can agree on – shaming our children because of their parent’s financial status is
no way to effectively gain back the lunch debt.
With technology at our fingertips, schools and parent should be able to figure out much
more effective and reasonable ways to contact one another. Apps, phone calls, automated emails,
etc., all of these ways of communication can be effective alternatives to the shaming that is going
on in over forty percent of the nation’s school districts.
Our children are our future doctors, lawyers, entrepreneurs, scientists, engineers and
teachers. We as a country should be giving every child the ability to succeed and thrive in
schools, but as long as lunch shaming is still going on, they will continue to be suppressed. Pass
the Anti-Lunch Shaming Act, because our children should not be caught in the middle of these
stigmatizing tactics.
11. 11Children & Lunch Shaming: America’s Neglected Stain
References
Anti-Lunch Shaming Act of 2017. H.R. 2401, 115th Cong., Congress.gov (2017, May 8)
(Enacted). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr2401/BILLS-
115hr2401ih.pdf
Chaux, E., & Castellanos, M. (2015). Money and age in schools: Bullying and power
imbalances. Aggressive Behavior, 41(3), 280-293. doi:10.1002/ab.21558
Earl, Jennifer. (2017, May 16). Dad starts campaign to end “Lunch Shaming,” erases
debts at 99 schools. CBS News. Retrieved from
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dads-wanted-to-pay-off-schools-lunch-debt-
ends-up-covering-entire-district/
Feeding America. (2017). Child Hunger Facts. Retrieved November 06, 2017, from
http://www.feedingamerica.org/hunger-in-america/child-hunger-facts.html
Hunger-Free Students Bill of Rights Act. SB 374. Retrieved from
https://www.nmlegis.gov/Sessions/17%20Regular/final/SB0374.pdf
Long, Heather (2017, May 10). School Lunch Shaming: Inside America’s Hidden Debt
Crisis. CNN Money. Retrieved from
http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/09/news/economy/school-lunch-shaming-debt-
crisis/index.html?iid=EL
Pupil meals: Child Hunger Prevention and Fair Treatment Act of 2017. S. 250, 115th Cong.
(2017) (enacted).
Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act. P.L. 79–396, 60 Stat. 230, (June 4, 1946)
(Enacted). Retrieved from https://fns-
prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/NSLA.pdf
Siegel, B. (2017, April 30). Shaming Children So Parents Will Pay the School Lunch
Bill. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/30/well/family/lunch-shaming-children-
parents-school-
bills.html?action=click&contentCollection=N.Y.%20%2F%20Region&module=
RelatedCoverage®ion=EndOfArticle&pgtype=article