The Switchboard
            Business Design
By Group 5:
• Cheryl Correa (F11014)
• Gitanjali (F11018)
• Neha Thomas (F11035)
• Ramya Chittigala (F11045)
CONTENTS
• Introduction – How it all started

• Business Designs:
   1.   The Discount Brokerage Design
   2.   Serving the Financial Planners
   3.   OneSource: The Switchboard Business Design


• Bridging the Communication Gap – Talk to Chuck Campaign
How it all started
• 1971 - Charles Schwab started ‘First Commander’

• Initial business model similar to a conventional brokerage

• No brand, No technology, No client base

• 1975 - SEC outlawed fixed commissions

• Schwab seized opportunity – business design changed to
  ‘discount broker’
Timeline
• 1971- Started the brokerage, First Commander
• 1975 – Started the discount brokerage
• 1984 – Had 20% of discount brokerage market
• 1985-89 – The Schwab Institutional Enterprise
 linking independent advisors
• 1989 – TeleBroker system introduced
• 1992 – Charles Schwab OneSource launched
• 1995 – e.Schwab launched
The Discount Brokerage business
• Conventional brokers - high fee due to Advice, Counseling and
  Trading capabilities



• Listening Gap: No option for low-cost trades due to ‘Bundled’
  package (Advice + Trading functions)

       Closing the Gap - Discount brokerage (to unbundle Advice and
       Trades)
Value-added Discounter model
• Need for differentiation – ‘Why does the customer want to buy
  from me?’

• Customer-centric service-design:

  •   Salaries instead of Commissions
  •   Reliable information to customers
  •   Addressed investors need: Inexpensive Access to Market
  •   Gave customers what they wanted ONLY, no additional costs
  •   Up-to-date technology: More easily executable trades
• Emphasis on greater value to customers influenced Customer-
  Perception

• Re-invested Profit in:
  -   Building brand-name and branch network
  -   Establishing local presence
  -   Computers & Technology
  -   Investor-support
  -   Advertising: Charles Schwab on TV, radio, billboard and print ads

• Addressed Competition by:
  - Strong differentiation
  - Sharing services with new customers instead of hard-selling new
    products to existing customers
Second Business Model: Serving
the Financial Planners
Market Environment
 • Change in customer behaviour in the late 1980s – from savings to
   investment
 • Need for unbiased, independent financial advisors
 • Mushrooming of independent advisors – individual and partnership firms

What did Schwab do?
Developed New Ways to deliver – Using Financial Planner
Created a new channel to the investors/customers through independent
advisors.
Leveraged the strength of the financial planners to grow his own business.
Gaps in the Existing Service
Model
• Listening Gap – Most traditional firms didn’t recognise the change needs
  of the customers
        Closing the Gap – The Schwab Institutional Enterprise linking
        Charles Schwab & company with independent financial
        advisors.

• Service Performance Gap – The financial advisors were not
  technologically capable of meeting the necessary customers needs
  through efficient back end operations
       Closing the Gap – Schwab stepped in to become the back- office
       operation for many financial planners and thereby gained more
       customers for itself.

• Communication Gap – Changing investor behaviour rendered traditional
  methods of communications unsuccessful
      Closing the Gap – Communication about Schwab services
      through financial advisors/planners.
Benefits Schwab Gained
• Customer selection increased – financial planners as well as
  investors

• Converting ‘perceived’ competitors into clients

• Created a large pool of virtual sales force at no cost

• Stayed ahead of competitors by taking advantage of their lack
  of response

• Increased profits
The Next Leap - OneSource
WHY?
• Enormous expansion in the Mutual fund market space
  • both in investments and rising of numerous fund companies
• Caused mainly 2 problem to customers:
  • Dizzying array of mostly unbranded fund options
  • High overall transaction fee (load fee + brokerage fee)
  • The transaction fee proved to be not just a financial barrier but a
    psychological one
• Complexity for customers to relocate assets among funds
• Also Schwab focused on business model that had a floor of
  recurring revenue
OneSource
WHAT?
• “There were thousands of salespeople out there selling load
  funds, with huge commissions,” explains Chuck Schwab. “We
  wanted to create a way for people to buy a variety of mutual
  funds directly through us — have lots of choice, diversification
  — in a way that they could do it conveniently and at low cost.”


• This gave rise to ONESOURCE in July 1992
Service Adjuncts
• Offered a no-load, no-transaction fee policy – “Discounted
  Mutual Funds”

• All funds in OneSource was accessible through a single phone
  call and was tracked in a single account statement

• Had a double advantage for both investors and mutual fund
  companies – Acted as a switchboard between the two

• All backend work was carried out by Schwab for the fund
  companies thereby saving cost and time
The Switchboard Business
Design
Industry Response
Mainly 3 types of responses:
• Denial :
  • No response, Thought that OneSource would be just a passing fad
• Fee Structure:
  • Full service brokerage firms introduced new share classes with
    their funds with low or no fees
• Imitation :
  • Replication of same Business Model
  • Eg: Fidelity included 370 funds
Technology and Schwab
•   1989 – Tele Broker
•   Voice Broker
•   1993 – Street smart Software
•   1995 – e.Schwab

    • Complete account specifically designed for active traders

    • Used an e.schwab account to do trading at any time without the
      assistance of any account reps
Future of Schwab
• OneSource as a gateway to bank customers - a customer
  segment unlikely to get

• SchwabLife Insurance Services – “Discount Life Insurance”

• AdvisorSource Program – advices clients with > $100,000 in
  their portfolio

• Bought over UK firm – ShareLink Investment Services as
  expansion to new markets
Schwab’s Communication in the
21st Century
• Competition from low-cost providers causing withdrawals for
  Schwab Investor Services customers

• New target market: Mass affluent

• Fairly knowledgeable about investing, want quality services
  yet are cost-conscious

• Communication strategies: Product-oriented, dispersed
  campaigns

• Multiple campaigns conflict with each other
Talk to Chuck Campaign
• Aimed to increase awareness levels among the target
  customers

• Reposition the company as a value-for-money alternative to
  traditional high fee charging financial services firms

• Communicate that the firm’s objectives are imbibed by each
  employee of the company.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8rNyK1vGKQ
Campaign Attributes
• Easy to pronounce and remember

• References a known personality, whose values can be seen

• Personifies trust, integrity, professionalism, and
  approachability, confidence in ability to serve customer needs,
  a personal touch and an overall care for the client as a person

• Encourages investors to have straightforward conversations
  with a company employee about common issues in taking
  investment decisions

• An informal feel that projects the feeling of being able to
  confide in a close friend
Communication Strategy
Characteristics
• Target is new and existing customers who can invest $50,000
  to $2 million

• Affective component: Changing current investor attitudes
  towards financial services firms

• Behavioral component: Call and talk to a Schwab
  representative

• Essentially a pull strategy
Conclusions
• Be sensitive to evolving customer needs

• Be proactive

• Ask the right questions

• Be innovative – Seize opportunities

• Be in constant touch with the customer
Charles schwab

Charles schwab

  • 1.
    The Switchboard Business Design By Group 5: • Cheryl Correa (F11014) • Gitanjali (F11018) • Neha Thomas (F11035) • Ramya Chittigala (F11045)
  • 2.
    CONTENTS • Introduction –How it all started • Business Designs: 1. The Discount Brokerage Design 2. Serving the Financial Planners 3. OneSource: The Switchboard Business Design • Bridging the Communication Gap – Talk to Chuck Campaign
  • 3.
    How it allstarted • 1971 - Charles Schwab started ‘First Commander’ • Initial business model similar to a conventional brokerage • No brand, No technology, No client base • 1975 - SEC outlawed fixed commissions • Schwab seized opportunity – business design changed to ‘discount broker’
  • 4.
    Timeline • 1971- Startedthe brokerage, First Commander • 1975 – Started the discount brokerage • 1984 – Had 20% of discount brokerage market • 1985-89 – The Schwab Institutional Enterprise linking independent advisors • 1989 – TeleBroker system introduced • 1992 – Charles Schwab OneSource launched • 1995 – e.Schwab launched
  • 5.
    The Discount Brokeragebusiness • Conventional brokers - high fee due to Advice, Counseling and Trading capabilities • Listening Gap: No option for low-cost trades due to ‘Bundled’ package (Advice + Trading functions) Closing the Gap - Discount brokerage (to unbundle Advice and Trades)
  • 6.
    Value-added Discounter model •Need for differentiation – ‘Why does the customer want to buy from me?’ • Customer-centric service-design: • Salaries instead of Commissions • Reliable information to customers • Addressed investors need: Inexpensive Access to Market • Gave customers what they wanted ONLY, no additional costs • Up-to-date technology: More easily executable trades
  • 7.
    • Emphasis ongreater value to customers influenced Customer- Perception • Re-invested Profit in: - Building brand-name and branch network - Establishing local presence - Computers & Technology - Investor-support - Advertising: Charles Schwab on TV, radio, billboard and print ads • Addressed Competition by: - Strong differentiation - Sharing services with new customers instead of hard-selling new products to existing customers
  • 8.
    Second Business Model:Serving the Financial Planners Market Environment • Change in customer behaviour in the late 1980s – from savings to investment • Need for unbiased, independent financial advisors • Mushrooming of independent advisors – individual and partnership firms What did Schwab do? Developed New Ways to deliver – Using Financial Planner Created a new channel to the investors/customers through independent advisors. Leveraged the strength of the financial planners to grow his own business.
  • 9.
    Gaps in theExisting Service Model • Listening Gap – Most traditional firms didn’t recognise the change needs of the customers Closing the Gap – The Schwab Institutional Enterprise linking Charles Schwab & company with independent financial advisors. • Service Performance Gap – The financial advisors were not technologically capable of meeting the necessary customers needs through efficient back end operations Closing the Gap – Schwab stepped in to become the back- office operation for many financial planners and thereby gained more customers for itself. • Communication Gap – Changing investor behaviour rendered traditional methods of communications unsuccessful Closing the Gap – Communication about Schwab services through financial advisors/planners.
  • 10.
    Benefits Schwab Gained •Customer selection increased – financial planners as well as investors • Converting ‘perceived’ competitors into clients • Created a large pool of virtual sales force at no cost • Stayed ahead of competitors by taking advantage of their lack of response • Increased profits
  • 11.
    The Next Leap- OneSource WHY? • Enormous expansion in the Mutual fund market space • both in investments and rising of numerous fund companies • Caused mainly 2 problem to customers: • Dizzying array of mostly unbranded fund options • High overall transaction fee (load fee + brokerage fee) • The transaction fee proved to be not just a financial barrier but a psychological one • Complexity for customers to relocate assets among funds • Also Schwab focused on business model that had a floor of recurring revenue
  • 12.
    OneSource WHAT? • “There werethousands of salespeople out there selling load funds, with huge commissions,” explains Chuck Schwab. “We wanted to create a way for people to buy a variety of mutual funds directly through us — have lots of choice, diversification — in a way that they could do it conveniently and at low cost.” • This gave rise to ONESOURCE in July 1992
  • 13.
    Service Adjuncts • Offereda no-load, no-transaction fee policy – “Discounted Mutual Funds” • All funds in OneSource was accessible through a single phone call and was tracked in a single account statement • Had a double advantage for both investors and mutual fund companies – Acted as a switchboard between the two • All backend work was carried out by Schwab for the fund companies thereby saving cost and time
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Industry Response Mainly 3types of responses: • Denial : • No response, Thought that OneSource would be just a passing fad • Fee Structure: • Full service brokerage firms introduced new share classes with their funds with low or no fees • Imitation : • Replication of same Business Model • Eg: Fidelity included 370 funds
  • 17.
    Technology and Schwab • 1989 – Tele Broker • Voice Broker • 1993 – Street smart Software • 1995 – e.Schwab • Complete account specifically designed for active traders • Used an e.schwab account to do trading at any time without the assistance of any account reps
  • 18.
    Future of Schwab •OneSource as a gateway to bank customers - a customer segment unlikely to get • SchwabLife Insurance Services – “Discount Life Insurance” • AdvisorSource Program – advices clients with > $100,000 in their portfolio • Bought over UK firm – ShareLink Investment Services as expansion to new markets
  • 19.
    Schwab’s Communication inthe 21st Century • Competition from low-cost providers causing withdrawals for Schwab Investor Services customers • New target market: Mass affluent • Fairly knowledgeable about investing, want quality services yet are cost-conscious • Communication strategies: Product-oriented, dispersed campaigns • Multiple campaigns conflict with each other
  • 20.
    Talk to ChuckCampaign • Aimed to increase awareness levels among the target customers • Reposition the company as a value-for-money alternative to traditional high fee charging financial services firms • Communicate that the firm’s objectives are imbibed by each employee of the company. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8rNyK1vGKQ
  • 21.
    Campaign Attributes • Easyto pronounce and remember • References a known personality, whose values can be seen • Personifies trust, integrity, professionalism, and approachability, confidence in ability to serve customer needs, a personal touch and an overall care for the client as a person • Encourages investors to have straightforward conversations with a company employee about common issues in taking investment decisions • An informal feel that projects the feeling of being able to confide in a close friend
  • 23.
    Communication Strategy Characteristics • Targetis new and existing customers who can invest $50,000 to $2 million • Affective component: Changing current investor attitudes towards financial services firms • Behavioral component: Call and talk to a Schwab representative • Essentially a pull strategy
  • 24.
    Conclusions • Be sensitiveto evolving customer needs • Be proactive • Ask the right questions • Be innovative – Seize opportunities • Be in constant touch with the customer