Charlemagne was born in 742 in France and rose to become the King of the Franks. He unified much of Western Europe through military campaigns and introduced social, political, and cultural reforms during a period known as the Carolingian Renaissance. Charlemagne encouraged education, Christianity, and cultural development. He died in 814 at age 72, leaving a legacy as a strong leader who transformed medieval Europe.

1. Charlemagne Essay
Charlemagne Charles the Great Charlemagne, or Charles the Great, was born in 742 to Pepin the Short and Bertrada of Laon. The oldest of four
children, Charlemagne rose to great power and significance. He rebuilt the crumbling society of Medieval Europe by introducing numerous social,
political and cultural reforms in what we now call the Carolingian Renaissance. He became the King of the Franks, and gained the title of Holy
Roman Emperor. Through many military campaigns, he unified northern Europe and established a flourishing society. Charlemagne was born two
years before his parents married; this resulted in him being born out of wedlock. His father was declared the King of the Franks in 751 after the
Merovingian King was...show more content...
He initiated Trial by Ordeal, and introduced a Jury. Admired by many, he made laws to protect the peasants, and even lowered the power the nobles
held. He recorded events and incidents, and encouraged education, arts, and culture. He led Western Europe out of the dark and into a better way of
life. In January 814, Charlemagne died in Aachen, Germany, due to a lung infection. He was 72 years old at the time. Charlemagne had been a
leading thinker and ruler during the Carolingian Renaissance. He was respected, feared, and loved. Louie the Pious, Holy Roman Emperor and heir to
the Frankish throne, gained kingship. Unfortunatly, after Charlemagne's death, his empire collapsed, as no leader could match his magnificence.
Charlemagne changed the way people lived in his kingdom. The reforms he brought are used in everyday life; and although some of these ideas did
not stick at the time, they were later reintroduced and widely accepted. He began recording significant events, and this is how we know so much about
our past. He ensured Christianity be the main religion in Europe, and united scattered countries and impoverished territories. He also encouraged
equality through education and the distribution of power. Charlemagne is model leader, and his achievements should be recognized as they influence
society even
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Charlemagne Essay examples
What makes В‘a' king into В‘the' king and then onto Emperor and Augustus? What made King Charles, Charles the Great? In Einhard's Life of
Charlemagne, a very succinct description of King Charles' ideals, beliefs, attitudes and traits are depicted along with his life's territorial as well as
mental conquests illustrated. Charlemagne was a man with a vision of a utopian society united under Christianity in its glorious form in an almost
Camelot like kingdom. Einhard's literary work gives society an insight into King Charles and what made him capable of being Augustus. As indicated
by Einhard, Charlemagne was a man of all talents but few beliefs and traits truly molded him. Charlemagne ruled over an empire and Christianity ruled
over and...show more content...
In addition, Charlemagne was a man devoted to his beliefs who was essentially kind, friendly, very patriotic and, also, trying to be known for his
acts and create a good reputation for himself. Over the course of his life Charlemagne was able to create great ties with fellow leaders around the
world and through various empires, and although he was also trying to aid Christians who needed help in foreign lands, he seemed to have this
need to have good relations with everyone. According to Einhard, he had great friendships all around the world and always welcomed foreigners in
his kingdom and palace for only one simple thing in return. "For he felt that he would be rewarded for his troubles if they [foreigners] praised his
generosity and gave him a good reputation" (Einhard 2004, 212). He was a great king who wanted to go down in history. As per Einhard, that seems
to be Charlemagne's only selfish trait. He apparently only wore the national dress of the Frankish with few exceptions, which can only imply his great
patriotism. Although he appreciated foreign customs, he seems to be very patriotic towards the Franks. Overall, Charlemagne embodied traits that came
together to form this great Emperor who was admired by many.
In The Life of Charlemagne one notices that Frankish society must have formulated certain characteristics through the reign of King Charles. Through
the king's beliefs a society forms to follow
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Charlemagne Essay
Charlemagne
By the Cross and the Sword : Charlemagne's Impact on the West. "He who ordains the fate of kingdoms in the march of the centuries, the all–powerful
Disposer of events, having destroyed one extraordinary image, that of the Romans, which had, it was true, feet of iron, or even feet of clay, then raised
up, among the Franks, the golden head of a second image, equally remarkable, in the person of the illustrious Charlemagne. Notker the Stammerer, the
monk of St. Gall, wrote these words in AD 844 to describe the reign of the most influential Frankish king Charlemagne ( Lectures 1). Charlemagne,
son of Pepin the Short, ruled the Franks for 47 years (Koeller 1). The Carolingian Dynasty, of which Charlemagne was a member, was...show more
content...
In Charlemagne's palace school at Aachen, one finds the ideals and aims of the Carolingian renaissance most definitively. Palace schools were not
unheard of in the Frankish kingdom. The Merovingians established a school to train young nobles to fight, and how to conduct themselves at court. At
the time, however, no academic knowledge was being imparted. The only schools that taught academics were at monasteries and cathedrals.
Charlemagne altered the palace school into a center of learning and knowledge (Carolingian Schools 1). He hired scholars to teach, and appointed
Alcuin to oversee the school. Charlemagne required Alcuin himself to instruct the royal family in reading and writing. In addition to the palace
school, Charlemagne made many decrees concerning the education of his people (1). His "Charter of Modern Thought" required that the monasteries
be concerned with "the study of letters" (2). In yet another decree Charlemagne ordered that teachers "who are both willing and able to learn" be hired
and "let them apply themselves to this work with a zeal equal to the earnestness with which we recommend it to them" (2). Knox argues again on this
point saying "Charles' court at Aix–la– Chapelle was a beacon for men of learning, and the king funded their activities. It was from these, and others,
there originated a burst of activity that would have a strong influence on medieval intellectual life" (Knox 14). Charlemagne provided not only for the
sons of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Charlemagne Essay
After reading two versions of "The Life of Charlemagne", one written by a person who lived with Charlemagne, and one who didn't, it is evident
that Charlemagne is portrayed in a negative way by the author, the Monk of St. Gall, and in a positive way by Einhard. Einhard was very close to
Charlemagne. He lived at the same time and with Charlemagne himself. His version of "The Life of Charlemagne" was writing right after his death. The
Monk of St. Gall wrote his version more than 70 years after Charlemagne's death. He did not live with or even at the same time as Charlemagne. This
is probably one of the reasons the view on the ruler are completely different.
The reason Einhard wrote his biography of Charlemagne was to explain to the world...show more content...
Altogether, Charlemagne's rule was a successful one and Charlemagne rarely, if ever, made mistakes according to Einhard.
In St. Gall's version of "The Life of Charlemagne" the author does not give any background information at all. The reason St. Gall is writing this
version of Charlemagne's life is to blame him for the attacks going on at present times. He gives no information about Charlemagne's family or
ancestors. The author immediately begins to start his complaining about how Charlemagne basically did nothing good for the empire he was ruling.
"After the omnipotent ruler of the world, who orders alike the fate of kingdoms and the course of time, had broken the feet of iron and clay in one
noble statue, to wit the Romans, he raised by the hands of the illustrious Charles the golden head of another, not less admirable, among the Franks". At
the beginning of this quote, Einhard is praising Charlemagne. St. Gall is placing Charlemagne at the same level as the Romans, saying God has raised
up Charlemagne to succeed them. Then, at the end of the quote, it is unclear why St. Gall says that the bishop falls of his horse. To me, this seems
some sort of a negative passage making the reader think Charlemagne is somewhat incompetent. This being the first entry in this author's text, it
immediately gives off a negative feeling towards Charlemagne. The reader immediately has a negative bias towards Charlemagne
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. Essay on Charlemagne
Charlemagne The two lives of Charlemagne as told by Einhard and Notker the Stammerer are very different accounts of the life of the great
Emperor. Einhard gives us a historical overview of the life of Charlemagne who lived from 742 to 814 A.D. Charlemagne was also known as Charles
the Great and the King of the Franks.Charles was one of four children born to Pepin the Short, A Mayor of the Palace of the Carolingian Empire. He
had one brother, Carloman and two sisters, Gisela and Pepin.Since women at the time didn't inherit power, when Pepin the Short died, the kingship of
the Carolingian Empire was divided and shared by Charlemagne and his brother, Carloman. Unfortunately, Carloman died early and unexpectedly as a
young man and...show more content...
During that time he practically doubled the land given to him by his father. He successfully waged war against many including the Bretons, Bavaria,
the Slavs, Esthonians, Danes and an especially long thirty–year war against the Saxons. He was a respected and feared by many of the rulers of other
lands.
He is also remembered because of the Carolingian Renaissance which took place under his direction and leadership. Although he was not a learned
man, he revered and respected knowledge. He attracted many scholars to his palace. Theology and the literary
Skills became a part of the everyday life in the palace for nobles and common people of talent as well. Many building projects were also undertaken
during this time of renaissance including two magnificent palaces the cathedral of the church of the Holy Mother of God at Aachen, the bridge over
the Rhine at Mainz, the restoration of many sacred buildings which had fallen into disrepair, and the building of a naval and coastguard fleet to protect
the ports and mouths of rivers from enemy attack.
Charlemagne died at the age of 72 and designed his only surviving son Lewis as heir to his kingship. He was interred at his beloved cathedral in 814
A.D. In his will, he provided for the church, the cities in the kingdom, all of his children, grandchildren, palace workers, servants and the poor.
Einhard's historical view outlined above gives a historical view
Get more content on HelpWriting.net