Changing your space inevitably requires organizational and operational changes in how people work. (Otherwise, why would you invest in the space changes in order to do the same things you can do today, in the same way?).
However, robust change management is rarely integrated into the process so that space, operational, and organizational changes are conceived of, considered, and implemented together. This can come with great costs like operational inefficiencies, lost productivity, diminished staff engagement, and reduced user satisfaction – all of which undermine space investments.
This interactive session will provide a basic overview of change management, including the history and theory behind it, the process and participants, the tools and techniques involved, and case studies drawn from a variety sectors and scales.
Very excited today because every single presentation has talked about the need for change management. Without execution the best plans are meaningless and even can be counterproductive, setting back the progress you are trying to make with your organization.
You have heard so far a lot of quantitative, metric based analysis on space strategy.
Change fundamentally is emotional.
You can’t ignore the needs and fears of individual of asking them to change, especially when it comes to something like personal space and how they like to work.
I like to share a personal story of change management as way to understand what at its heart is an emotional process for your organization.
I moved my family this summer from a loft to a townhouse. Not far, just a couple miles within brooklyn, but I learned a lot about change and managing relationships with change.
It’s not just about the quality of the space or the features.
The real question is about how will my behaviors have to change and how will my relationships be affected. That’s what people really care about
In an open single floor loft, everything happened together, but in the townhouse different activities would be in separate spaces on different floors. There was a lot of concern about how that would affect the time we spent together as a family.
Example: a closed office can be about status, but it is also about a preference to work chaotically or messily.
Space questions are really organizational questions. The two are deeply interlinked.
Space is catalyst or most tangible form of organizational change. But how they happen together? Work together?
That is the question we are going to answer today. How do space and organizational change work together to each other’s benefit.
3 objectives for today.
Theoretical– theory and research behind change management.
Process – how a change management process is structured.
Tools and techniques – resources and techniques to accomplish it, key ones being communications, participatory design, and piloting.
With the rapid pace of technological change, a huge amount of research on change and people’s ability to adopt to it.
Diffusion of innovations – that not everyone approaches change the same way
Enthusiasm, communication, and reasons.
Go over chart quickly.
Make it real, apply it to my family.
Dad- it’s going to be great, there are good reasons both financially and convenience, close to work and schools.
Daughter – is it cool? Will my friends be jealous? I want to try and be a part of the new thing.
Mom – well, it makes sense in theory but prove to me this will work. It won’t be a disaster.
Son – I hate it, but fine if the whole family is doing it I don’t want to be left behind by myself.
Plan for this, incorporate it into your thinking for change management.
It’s never going to be like flipping a switch, it’s incremental because people themselves come along at different times.
----- Meeting Notes (11/16/15 14:00) -----
Universal – what they are all share regardless of their group.
Review 5.
All are about the user. This is about how the change affects the user, not the organization. People will evaluated based on their personal needs and goals.
Make it real – first 3, can I see it, can I play with it, do I understand it?
Prove to me the benefits - will it work for how I like to work? Is it better than what I have now?
How do you do this? Address these five factors in your process.
Participatory design process. Too often design and change management are seen as two different processes, but they are combined through participatory design
Involving all your stakeholders in the research, thinking, and design.
Not just finding what they want but teaching them how to be active members in the design process.
Creators – working side by side with designers they understand the various trade offs and the process.
Prototyping – designers of process even as they learn new processes.
Communication – not one way, two ways, back and forth
Understanding – agreement about the current state, the possibilities.
Visioning – chose where we want to go.
Planning & Prototyping – not just plans but making. Trialing. You should have a lot of real data before you get to the full implementation.
Implementing – executing the plan.
Staff at New York Public Library. Look at sorts of spaces that are not libraries.
Leverage users as researchers.
Self discovery – don’t just ask them what they want, teach them how to better understand what they want. Send them out to look at things and make discoveries.
Make the relevant benefits tangible. Help us understand what’s important, keys for compatibility. Make it real.
Google offices.
People talk about features, i.e. closed office, but you want to shift that conversation to activities.
Why do you need a closed office? What kind of activities does that support? Is there another way to support them? A better way?
SFMOMA. There new addition.
Vision has to be a collaborative process. Build those working relationships.
Designing collaboration
Leadership – appropriate to have their own visioning session
Departmental –Libraries you would bring academic staff and IT together.
Cross level - heirarchies between faculty and students or staff that would be hard to bridge.
University of minnesota – work+
Strategy is the story. It’s not just a list of benefits, its about how things are changing.
Every space has a story whether its made explicit or not.
Delft University of Technology
Designers designing open access, technologically connected, collaborative space. Live it themselves.
Shared space between employees and sometimes even with users fosters collaboration and interaction across various teams and departments
Google offices in London
Google promotes interaction through density and amenities
Planning & prototyping
Really focus on prototyping and piloting
All kinds of forms and levels of fidelity.
From just mapping people’s experience, drawing it on a plan with photos.
To staff internal rehearsals and practicing.
To full on live pilots.
Reasons for pilots.
Integrated mobile service point. Try it out in existing space. Really understand the technology and FFE needs.
Even after it opened, flexibility built in to change it.
- enable side by side consultation. Share screens.
New collaboration spaces and transition from private to open offices
Took the private offices and put them in public space. Moved them out over a weekend.
New collaboration offices.
Temporary people are willing to try.
Digital strategy firm.
Observation about side by side work.
What is proof? More research that goes on and on or trying it out?
Rotating desks that everyone could try out in weekly intervals.
Gain 3 hours per week of productivity time.
The centerpiece of our efforts to adapt our spaces to how people work today and to minimize the need for “net new” space is our Alternative Work Place Strategies program, which we have branded Work+
As part of our efforts to advance space utilization initiatives, the Office of Space Management was merged into Capital Planning and Project Management this past year.
This move s intended, among other goals, to better integrate space and work space planning into the capital project processes.
Compatibility & Relative Advantage from Roger’s
Compatibility – do I have the tools I need?
Relative Advantage – not just showing but you have to train people to take advantage of it. Teach them how to work differently.
Working
New ways of Working – GSK, calendaring in 30 min increments. What is it’s a 5 minute talk? Where should I be for what kind of work? Introverts – finding the quiet team they need. Learning to collaborate.
Managing flexible teams – how am I going to manage my team where I don’t always know where they are sitting?
Norms and Protocols – GSK talked about this. Don’t camp out. How messy can my space be? How do we share equipment, how does purchasing work?
Tools
Storage – making
Technology – IMVS – room scheduling software, collaboration tools like shared screens or google hangout when people arent in same space.
Norms –
Really think these through and do it collaborative with lots of engagement. You will be surprised at the number of issues.
Surveys, workshops, interviews. Focus groups.
Make the communication tangible different.
Visual commiunication, words, need to speak to the identity of your new vision.
Communicate, communicate, communicate.
At the same time, be strategic, provide the right kind of information to the people when they want and need it. It can’t be white noise.
Example of audience segmentation.
Implementation -
One OHR – goals to drive collaboration across departments. Collaboration within department did suffer a little bit. But this about understanding really what you are priorities, what are giving up and what are you gaining.
A lot of change management questions. Happy to answer them. Informal office hours to discuss your issues and possible solutions.