1) The petitioner appealed an order by the High Court dismissing their case for lack of jurisdiction over matters involving state land. 2) The petitioner argued that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by interpreting provisions of the Constitution, which is solely within the domain of the Supreme Court. 3) However, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that while the High Court should have referred the constitutional question to the Supreme Court, the interpretation would not have changed the outcome of the case based on previous rulings.