SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Bureaucracy gone mad
Russell Grenning
The Federal Governmentishardat itcuttingred tape and notbefore time,of course,butat leasta
start has beenmade.
There was,apparently,muchrejoicingon18March thisyear – the thirdRedTape Repeal Day since
the AbbottGovernmentcame tooffice – whenthe ParliamentarySecretarytothe Prime Minister
ChristianPorterannouncedthata further890 Acts of Parliamentand160 LegislativeInstruments
were tobe scrapped.
Accordingto Mr Porter,“We are instituting a cultural shiftin thinking aboutregulation” and
“Deregulation units – tasked withthe identifying and driving red tapereduction acrossthe
Commonwealth –nowexistin every portfolio.”
Mr Porter,incidentally,wasWesternAustraliaTreasurerbeforehe quitState Parliamentjustbefore
the last election. Idon’tdoubthissincerityalthoughIdonote that Deloitte’s,the top-tiereconomics
consultancy,reportedlastOctoberthatself-imposedredtape wascostingWA $37 billionayear.
Yes,theyhave a red tape reductionoutfit soIwonderwhat happenedunderMr Porter’swatch.
Agriculture MinisterBarnabyJoyce isa bigfan of red tape reductionandhe joinedMr Porterlast
March 18 to trumpetthe Government’sachievementsandwentonto saythat he welcomed
suggestionsabout“...how theGovernmentcan help cut red tape...”.
So,off I wentto hisDepartmenttocheck on progress.
In earlyJune itissuedmemoentitled,“Vegetables –Re-imported Australian fresh vegetables”. What
an eye-openerthatwas althoughitdidn’texplainwhyanybody,havingexportedtheirAustralian
vegieswouldwanttobringthemback.But, justincase,the Departmenthasthis possibility covered.
Thisclear andunambiguousmemostated, “Theinformation herecoversDepartment of Agriculture
quarantinerequirementsonly and iscurrent on the dateof transmission butmay changewithout
notice.Departmentof Agriculture makesno warrantiesorrepresentationswith respectto the
accuracy of completenessof thatinformation and will bearno liability with respect to that
information.”Well,I’msure thatitwasclear andunambiguoustothe WorkingPartyor Standing
Committee orAdHoc StrategicIssuesImplementationandAssessmentGrouporwhoeverelse
draftedit.
In EnglishIthink that meansthatthe Departmentmore orlessthinksthatwhattheyhave provided
ismore or lessupto date althoughitcouldhave changedand theycan’t be sure and don’ttry and
quote us.
Justto underline that,“TheCommonwealth through theDepartmentof Agricultureis notliable for
any costsarising fromor associated with decisionsof importersto importbased on conditions
presented here which are notcurrent atthe time of importation.” InEnglish,thatmeansimporters
are on theirownandtoo bloodybadif theygetit wrong.
Naturally,since we are talkingaboutAustralianproducedfreshvegetableswhichforsome obscure
reasonsare beingboughtback home,the Departmenthasa quickandeasyway to getpermission.
“It is the importer’sresponsibilityto identify and to ensure it hascomplied with all requirementsof
any otherregulatory and advisory bodiespriorto and after importation including theAustralian
Customsand BorderProtection Service,TherapeuticGoodsAdministration,Departmentof Health
and Ageing,Departmentof Sustainability,Environment,Water,Population and Communities,
Australian Pesticidesand Veterinary MedicinesAuthority and any Stateagenciessuch as
Departmentsof Agricultureand Health and EnvironmentalProtection authorities.”
Andif that is notenough, “Importersshould notethatthislist is notexhaustive,”the memonotes.
Thoughtfully,theygoonto pointoutthat importersmustcomplywith “Condition C9303”, “Entry
ManagementEM0184”, “Entry ManagementEM0185, “TreatmentT9902” and, of course
“QuarantineRegulations2000 (examplesincludea QuarantineEntry or a Quarantinedeclaration.”
Andimportersof Australianfreshvegetablesnotwanted byungrateful foreigners “mustcomply with
the Imported Food Act1992, an Actwhich is administered by the Departmentof Agriculture.”
If you wantsome publicservanttohelpyouout on whatI thinkisonlyone sectionof thisred-tape
nightmare, “Thefee rate is $120.00 an hour(forany assessmentperiod up to onehour) and $40.00
foreach quarterhour,orpart of a quarterhour,afterthe1-hourperiod. Note thatin addition to the
assessmentfee,an electronic lodgementfeeof $125.00 or a manuallodgementfeeof $225.00
applies.”
Andevenif all these proceduresweresuccessfullyaddressed,wouldthe re-importedAustralian
vegetablesstill be fresh?I’dbe temptedtoleave the bloodylotonthe wharf inSingapore or
whereverwithanote attached, “Takeit – it’s free.”
Giventhatthe processthatallowedthe creationof thisdocumentsurvivedthe Department’sown
DeregulationUnit, youshouldrememberthatlongjourneysbeginwithasingle step.
Now,whenall of the red tape isscrappedperhapsthe Governmentcouldintroduce intoevery
portfolioPlainSpeakingUnitswhichcouldvetmemosandotherdocuments? Now thatwould
provide the Governmentwithaverymeaningful legacy.

More Related Content

Similar to Bureaucracy gone mad

Alert July 2016 Insight from the Regulators
Alert July 2016 Insight from the RegulatorsAlert July 2016 Insight from the Regulators
Alert July 2016 Insight from the RegulatorsHelaena Short
 
Financial Services in Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
Financial Services in Transatlantic Trade and Investment PartnershipFinancial Services in Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
Financial Services in Transatlantic Trade and Investment PartnershipPatton Boggs LLP
 
Portugal Struggles to Generate Reform Plan
Portugal Struggles to Generate Reform PlanPortugal Struggles to Generate Reform Plan
Portugal Struggles to Generate Reform Plandotsondtffnizuri
 
Financial transactions tax update october 2014
Financial transactions tax update   october 2014Financial transactions tax update   october 2014
Financial transactions tax update october 2014Deusto Business School
 
Portugal Challenges to Create Reform Program
Portugal Challenges to Create Reform ProgramPortugal Challenges to Create Reform Program
Portugal Challenges to Create Reform Programspicystem1720
 
Academic letter re changes in surveillance law
Academic letter re changes in surveillance lawAcademic letter re changes in surveillance law
Academic letter re changes in surveillance lawAndrew Murray
 

Similar to Bureaucracy gone mad (8)

Brief 2010 UK bribery act
Brief 2010 UK bribery actBrief 2010 UK bribery act
Brief 2010 UK bribery act
 
Alert July 2016 Insight from the Regulators
Alert July 2016 Insight from the RegulatorsAlert July 2016 Insight from the Regulators
Alert July 2016 Insight from the Regulators
 
Financial Services in Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
Financial Services in Transatlantic Trade and Investment PartnershipFinancial Services in Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
Financial Services in Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
 
Portugal Struggles to Generate Reform Plan
Portugal Struggles to Generate Reform PlanPortugal Struggles to Generate Reform Plan
Portugal Struggles to Generate Reform Plan
 
Financial transactions tax update october 2014
Financial transactions tax update   october 2014Financial transactions tax update   october 2014
Financial transactions tax update october 2014
 
Portugal Challenges to Create Reform Program
Portugal Challenges to Create Reform ProgramPortugal Challenges to Create Reform Program
Portugal Challenges to Create Reform Program
 
Brands and Government IPR Policies
Brands and Government IPR Policies Brands and Government IPR Policies
Brands and Government IPR Policies
 
Academic letter re changes in surveillance law
Academic letter re changes in surveillance lawAcademic letter re changes in surveillance law
Academic letter re changes in surveillance law
 

More from Russell Grenning (20)

Why do people swear
Why do people swearWhy do people swear
Why do people swear
 
Yet another worry
Yet another worryYet another worry
Yet another worry
 
You get your friends where and when you can
You get your friends where and when you canYou get your friends where and when you can
You get your friends where and when you can
 
Writing memoirs
Writing memoirsWriting memoirs
Writing memoirs
 
Wood you do it to me
Wood you do it to meWood you do it to me
Wood you do it to me
 
Valentine
ValentineValentine
Valentine
 
With love from Lagos
With love from LagosWith love from Lagos
With love from Lagos
 
What to buy for Christmas gifts
What to buy for Christmas giftsWhat to buy for Christmas gifts
What to buy for Christmas gifts
 
What really happened at Waterloo
What really happened at WaterlooWhat really happened at Waterloo
What really happened at Waterloo
 
Unwanted gifts
Unwanted giftsUnwanted gifts
Unwanted gifts
 
Trying to save our beer
Trying to save our beerTrying to save our beer
Trying to save our beer
 
Toilet talk
Toilet talkToilet talk
Toilet talk
 
Timely warnings about climate change
Timely warnings about climate changeTimely warnings about climate change
Timely warnings about climate change
 
This won
This wonThis won
This won
 
Thinking about the tele
Thinking about the teleThinking about the tele
Thinking about the tele
 
There is nothing like a dame
There is nothing like a dameThere is nothing like a dame
There is nothing like a dame
 
There are birds
There are birdsThere are birds
There are birds
 
The third sex
The third sexThe third sex
The third sex
 
The Second Coming
The Second ComingThe Second Coming
The Second Coming
 
The rising cost of living
The rising cost of livingThe rising cost of living
The rising cost of living
 

Bureaucracy gone mad

  • 1. Bureaucracy gone mad Russell Grenning The Federal Governmentishardat itcuttingred tape and notbefore time,of course,butat leasta start has beenmade. There was,apparently,muchrejoicingon18March thisyear – the thirdRedTape Repeal Day since the AbbottGovernmentcame tooffice – whenthe ParliamentarySecretarytothe Prime Minister ChristianPorterannouncedthata further890 Acts of Parliamentand160 LegislativeInstruments were tobe scrapped. Accordingto Mr Porter,“We are instituting a cultural shiftin thinking aboutregulation” and “Deregulation units – tasked withthe identifying and driving red tapereduction acrossthe Commonwealth –nowexistin every portfolio.” Mr Porter,incidentally,wasWesternAustraliaTreasurerbeforehe quitState Parliamentjustbefore the last election. Idon’tdoubthissincerityalthoughIdonote that Deloitte’s,the top-tiereconomics consultancy,reportedlastOctoberthatself-imposedredtape wascostingWA $37 billionayear. Yes,theyhave a red tape reductionoutfit soIwonderwhat happenedunderMr Porter’swatch. Agriculture MinisterBarnabyJoyce isa bigfan of red tape reductionandhe joinedMr Porterlast March 18 to trumpetthe Government’sachievementsandwentonto saythat he welcomed suggestionsabout“...how theGovernmentcan help cut red tape...”. So,off I wentto hisDepartmenttocheck on progress. In earlyJune itissuedmemoentitled,“Vegetables –Re-imported Australian fresh vegetables”. What an eye-openerthatwas althoughitdidn’texplainwhyanybody,havingexportedtheirAustralian vegieswouldwanttobringthemback.But, justincase,the Departmenthasthis possibility covered. Thisclear andunambiguousmemostated, “Theinformation herecoversDepartment of Agriculture quarantinerequirementsonly and iscurrent on the dateof transmission butmay changewithout notice.Departmentof Agriculture makesno warrantiesorrepresentationswith respectto the accuracy of completenessof thatinformation and will bearno liability with respect to that information.”Well,I’msure thatitwasclear andunambiguoustothe WorkingPartyor Standing Committee orAdHoc StrategicIssuesImplementationandAssessmentGrouporwhoeverelse draftedit. In EnglishIthink that meansthatthe Departmentmore orlessthinksthatwhattheyhave provided ismore or lessupto date althoughitcouldhave changedand theycan’t be sure and don’ttry and quote us. Justto underline that,“TheCommonwealth through theDepartmentof Agricultureis notliable for any costsarising fromor associated with decisionsof importersto importbased on conditions presented here which are notcurrent atthe time of importation.” InEnglish,thatmeansimporters are on theirownandtoo bloodybadif theygetit wrong.
  • 2. Naturally,since we are talkingaboutAustralianproducedfreshvegetableswhichforsome obscure reasonsare beingboughtback home,the Departmenthasa quickandeasyway to getpermission. “It is the importer’sresponsibilityto identify and to ensure it hascomplied with all requirementsof any otherregulatory and advisory bodiespriorto and after importation including theAustralian Customsand BorderProtection Service,TherapeuticGoodsAdministration,Departmentof Health and Ageing,Departmentof Sustainability,Environment,Water,Population and Communities, Australian Pesticidesand Veterinary MedicinesAuthority and any Stateagenciessuch as Departmentsof Agricultureand Health and EnvironmentalProtection authorities.” Andif that is notenough, “Importersshould notethatthislist is notexhaustive,”the memonotes. Thoughtfully,theygoonto pointoutthat importersmustcomplywith “Condition C9303”, “Entry ManagementEM0184”, “Entry ManagementEM0185, “TreatmentT9902” and, of course “QuarantineRegulations2000 (examplesincludea QuarantineEntry or a Quarantinedeclaration.” Andimportersof Australianfreshvegetablesnotwanted byungrateful foreigners “mustcomply with the Imported Food Act1992, an Actwhich is administered by the Departmentof Agriculture.” If you wantsome publicservanttohelpyouout on whatI thinkisonlyone sectionof thisred-tape nightmare, “Thefee rate is $120.00 an hour(forany assessmentperiod up to onehour) and $40.00 foreach quarterhour,orpart of a quarterhour,afterthe1-hourperiod. Note thatin addition to the assessmentfee,an electronic lodgementfeeof $125.00 or a manuallodgementfeeof $225.00 applies.” Andevenif all these proceduresweresuccessfullyaddressed,wouldthe re-importedAustralian vegetablesstill be fresh?I’dbe temptedtoleave the bloodylotonthe wharf inSingapore or whereverwithanote attached, “Takeit – it’s free.” Giventhatthe processthatallowedthe creationof thisdocumentsurvivedthe Department’sown DeregulationUnit, youshouldrememberthatlongjourneysbeginwithasingle step. Now,whenall of the red tape isscrappedperhapsthe Governmentcouldintroduce intoevery portfolioPlainSpeakingUnitswhichcouldvetmemosandotherdocuments? Now thatwould provide the Governmentwithaverymeaningful legacy.