Bruner_Theory_of_Instruction for learning and teaching
1.
Bruner’s Theory ofInstruction
• By Jerome S. Bruner (1915–2016)
• Cognitive Psychologist
2.
Background
• • Developedin 1960s
• • Emphasized discovery learning and cognitive
development
• • Opposed rote memorization
3.
Main Idea
• •Learners construct knowledge actively
• • Emphasis on categorization and problem-
solving
• • Scaffolding: guidance from teacher
4.
Modes of Representation
•Bruner proposed 3 stages:
• 1. Enactive – learning by action (hands-on)
• 2. Iconic – learning through images/diagrams
• 3. Symbolic – learning through language,
symbols, abstract thinking
5.
Spiral Curriculum
• •Any subject can be taught at any stage of
development
• • Content should be revisited at increasing
levels of complexity
• • Encourages deeper understanding over time
6.
Discovery Learning
• •Students learn best by discovering principles
themselves
• • Teacher acts as facilitator, not information
giver
• • Promotes curiosity, problem-solving, and
creativity
7.
Educational Implications
• •Use hands-on, visual, and symbolic teaching
methods
• • Scaffold learning with teacher support
• • Design curriculum in spiral manner
• • Encourage active participation & discovery
8.
Criticism
• • Maynot suit all learners (some prefer
structured guidance)
• • Discovery learning can be time-consuming
• • Risk of misconceptions if guidance is
insufficient
9.
Conclusion
• • Bruneremphasized active learning,
scaffolding, and spiral curriculum
• • Strong impact on modern constructivist
approaches
• • Focus on learning how to learn, not just
content