Bruner’s Theory of Instruction
• By Jerome S. Bruner (1915–2016)
• Cognitive Psychologist
Background
• • Developed in 1960s
• • Emphasized discovery learning and cognitive
development
• • Opposed rote memorization
Main Idea
• • Learners construct knowledge actively
• • Emphasis on categorization and problem-
solving
• • Scaffolding: guidance from teacher
Modes of Representation
• Bruner proposed 3 stages:
• 1. Enactive – learning by action (hands-on)
• 2. Iconic – learning through images/diagrams
• 3. Symbolic – learning through language,
symbols, abstract thinking
Spiral Curriculum
• • Any subject can be taught at any stage of
development
• • Content should be revisited at increasing
levels of complexity
• • Encourages deeper understanding over time
Discovery Learning
• • Students learn best by discovering principles
themselves
• • Teacher acts as facilitator, not information
giver
• • Promotes curiosity, problem-solving, and
creativity
Educational Implications
• • Use hands-on, visual, and symbolic teaching
methods
• • Scaffold learning with teacher support
• • Design curriculum in spiral manner
• • Encourage active participation & discovery
Criticism
• • May not suit all learners (some prefer
structured guidance)
• • Discovery learning can be time-consuming
• • Risk of misconceptions if guidance is
insufficient
Conclusion
• • Bruner emphasized active learning,
scaffolding, and spiral curriculum
• • Strong impact on modern constructivist
approaches
• • Focus on learning how to learn, not just
content

Bruner_Theory_of_Instruction for learning and teaching

  • 1.
    Bruner’s Theory ofInstruction • By Jerome S. Bruner (1915–2016) • Cognitive Psychologist
  • 2.
    Background • • Developedin 1960s • • Emphasized discovery learning and cognitive development • • Opposed rote memorization
  • 3.
    Main Idea • •Learners construct knowledge actively • • Emphasis on categorization and problem- solving • • Scaffolding: guidance from teacher
  • 4.
    Modes of Representation •Bruner proposed 3 stages: • 1. Enactive – learning by action (hands-on) • 2. Iconic – learning through images/diagrams • 3. Symbolic – learning through language, symbols, abstract thinking
  • 5.
    Spiral Curriculum • •Any subject can be taught at any stage of development • • Content should be revisited at increasing levels of complexity • • Encourages deeper understanding over time
  • 6.
    Discovery Learning • •Students learn best by discovering principles themselves • • Teacher acts as facilitator, not information giver • • Promotes curiosity, problem-solving, and creativity
  • 7.
    Educational Implications • •Use hands-on, visual, and symbolic teaching methods • • Scaffold learning with teacher support • • Design curriculum in spiral manner • • Encourage active participation & discovery
  • 8.
    Criticism • • Maynot suit all learners (some prefer structured guidance) • • Discovery learning can be time-consuming • • Risk of misconceptions if guidance is insufficient
  • 9.
    Conclusion • • Bruneremphasized active learning, scaffolding, and spiral curriculum • • Strong impact on modern constructivist approaches • • Focus on learning how to learn, not just content