4. HISTORY
William Halsted
first radical mastectomy in 1889
• ‘‘The slightest inattention to detail and or attempts to hasten
convalescence by such plastic operations as are feasible
only when a restricted amount of skin is removed, may
sacrifice his patient to disease.”
5. 1895 Vincent Czerny
transplantation of a large lipoma from the patient’s flank
1906 the Tanzini
a pedicled flap of skin and underlying latissimus dorsi
muscle
1905 Ombredanne
pectoral muscle as amound.
luxury operation
1942 Sir Harold Gilles
tubed abdominal flap method
6. 1962 silicone breast implants
cosmetic augmentation
1970 s LD flap - most popular
1977 Hohler and Bohmert
2 stage reconstructions
thoracoepigastric flap + prosthesis
1982 Hartrampf
the first TRAM flap
1982 Radovan
tissue expansion
7. INDICATIONS
After mastectomy
After BCS
Congenital anomalies
Development anomalies
Traumatic disfigurement
8. CONCERNS BEFORE SX
Patient factors
Body habitus
Past history – Sx, RT, Co morbidity
Smoking
Patients wishes and education
Disease factors
Volume loss
Margin status
Stage of the disease
Adjuvant therapy
Surveillance
Other factors
Cost
Availability
Resources
Expertise
11. Unilateral & bilateral
Contralateral breast surgery
Reduction
Augmentation
NAC reconstruction
12. TIMING OF RECONSTRUCTION
40% of women in USA undergo mastectomy for Ca
Total number ~ 18000 a year
33% undergo breast reconstruction after
mastectomy
22% immediately
Cause
Lack of awareness
Failure of referral
13. Immediate
Adv
Wake up with a breast
Lesser # of GA
Better results
Colour
Sensate
Aesthetics
Shape
Specially with SSM,NSM`
Disadv
High expectations
Failure is a double blow
Dual surgical
competencies
14. Delayed
Adv
Patients are more
satisfied
Psychological
adjustment for lost
breast
Better decision making
for primary condition
Margin status
Disadv
Less skin remains
Tissue expansion
Less sensate
2 procedures
More GA
More resources
15. COMPOSITION
Aotologous
Pedicled myocutaneous flaps
LD
LD varients
Split LD
Fleur de lis
Muscle sparing
TRAM
Standard
Super charge TRAM- additional micro surgery to enhance blood
supply from thorax
Pre ligation of IEA- improve Superior EA blood supply
17. TRAM
Indications
Poor tissue quality after
MRM
Possible implant
exposure
Axillary fill
Infraclavicular tissue
deficit
Contra indications
Absolute
Irradiated flap base
Sx at the pedicle
Prior abdominoplasty
Abdominal scars
Relative
>65 yrs
V obese
Unfavorable
microcirculation
Diabetes
Smoking
18. Free flaps
Free TRAM
Modifications of TRAM- muscle sparing
MS 0 ,1, 2,3(DIEP)
SIEA
Stacked DIEP
GAP
SGAP
IGAP
MTG
Ruben`s flap
deep circumflex iliac artery flap
19.
20.
21. Adv
More natural
Physiologic changes may go
together
Eg LOW
Donor benefit
Abdominoplasty
Option after RT
Feel reconstruction is ‘own
breast’
Disadv
Risk of failure
Complications
Donor site morbidity
special skills
Resource demand
Longer surgery
Body Habitus
Non smokers
Longer recovery
22. Prosthetic
Implants
Silicon gel implant- standard
• Controversy of earlier silicon implant leaking and malignancy
is scientifically excluded in 2000
Tissue expanders
Permenant
Convertion to implant
24. COMPLICATIONS OF IMPLANTS
Capsular contracture
Baker classification
I. Soft
II. Less soft, implant not visible
III. Firm, implant palpable,distortion seen
IV. Very firm, hard tender,cold
Capsulotomy, capsulectomy
? To use leukotriene inhibitors
28. Adv
Single stage
Less time consuming
No donor scar or
morbidity
Good for small breasts
Better volume matching
Disadv
Foreign body reaction
Infection
Capsular contraction
sp if RT given
May need expander
stages
Difficult following RT
29. PRIMARY SURGERY
BCS-WLE
Reconstruction technique and volume loss
<20%- no need of complicated procedures
20-40% -volume displacement techniques
>40% volume replacement techniques
Mini LD
Thoraco epigastric
Intercostal perforator flaps
30. Adv
Adequate margins with good cosmetic results
Acceptable cosmesis in large volume resections
Long lasting good results
Reduce late unacceptable cosmetic effects of
radiation
31. Disadv
Difficulties of RT planning
- need for clip placement
If further resection needed
- ending in a mastectomy
Complication related to oncoplastics
- Skin necrosis
- Fat necrosis
- cosmetically less acceptable results
- Delayed wound healing leading to treatment
delays
Need of additional training in oncoplasty
32. PRINCIPLES BEHIND ONCOPLASTICS :
(A) vascular supply is maintained :
move skin with NAC on underlying breast
move breast against muscle
breast segments to be moved to a different location
NAC in appropriate direction
based on breast blocks ( superior / inferior based pedicles)
33. PRINCIPLES BEHIND ONCOPLASTICS :
(B) Selection criteria :
Excision volume - as % from breast volume
Tumour location - quadrant wise / clock position
Glandular density ( BIRDS)
34. PRINCIPLES BEHIND ONCOPLASTICS
(C) Selection of Levels of oncoplastic procedures
Level I ops (Dual plane under mining)
- Lesser volume loss
- Patients tolerating Duel-plane undermining
(BIRADS III / IV )
Level II ops (single plane undermining – dermoglandular flaps)
- For larger volume resections
- For breasts not tolerating duel-plane undermining
(BIRADS I/ II)
- For patients requesting reductions at the same time
51. Problems of breast reconstruction
Image survillance
Mammo- not possible
Need MRI
Insensate
Breast
Nipple
May need further procedures with time
Same side
Opposite side
Physiological changes absent