1) The document discusses an agreement between Iran, Turkey, and Brazil regarding Iran's nuclear program. 2) The agreement was based on previous trials by other international powers but differed in that Iran directly signed it. However, new UN sanctions broke the principle of trust in the agreement. 3) The agreement represented rationalist and normative approaches to trust, with Brazil and Turkey interested in regional security, while also using IAEA mechanisms to ensure the agreement's effectiveness.

1. English IIUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRelaçõesInternacionais

2. Iran-Turkey-Brazil AgreementUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroStudent: Rory Luiz A. Ribeiro JuniorDRE: 109081046Third periodTeacher: Rodrigo Borba

3. The Puzzle of trusting of relationshipsThe Concept of trust:Approach of Rationalist: stresses the importance of interests in the establishment of trust.- Approach of blinding: emphasis on the normative meaning that the relationship has for those whose establish it.

4. United NationsThe basic principles:Defense auto determination of the everyone people.

5. Every country are equal by International Law as well as independent and sovereign.

6. Defense of the development social economic.

7. Guarantee the peace and security in International Scenario.

8. Defense of Human Rights.Iran-Turkey-Brazil AgreementThe agreement was based in past trial of the Viena’s Group (USA, Russia, France, China, UK and Germany) and International Agency of Atomic Energy, but the similar difference was among these agreements are that by first time the Iranian Republic signs something and until now didn’t desist the Agreement among Brazil, Turkey and Iran in spite of the approval of the last sanctions by Security Council of United Nations. Then, the principle of trust in the case was broken, the Great Powers didn’t wait the agreement and put sanctions in the Agenda.