2. PROBLEM DEFINITION
Chamfering Operation is carried out before
machining.
Machined components moved to the secondary
operations may damage.
100% inspection is not done for all parameters.
3. KAIZEN THEME
Continual Improvement
How many places this kaizen can be deployed
horizontally?
What modification can be done?
How it improves the Process?
4. ACTUAL PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
RAW MATERIAL
INGOTS &
MELTING IN
FURNACE
CASTINGS FETTLING
DRILLING &
TAPPING
CNC
MACHINING &
BUSH
PRESSING
CHAMFERING
INPROCESS
INSPECTION
FINAL INSPECTION PACKING &
DISPATCH
5. DISADVANTAGES DUE TO THIS PROCESS:
Castings are getting damaged.
As defined by the customer outer diameter is the
critical parameter, it was being affected due to this
process flow.
In-House major rejection.
Unnecessary movement of components.
Dust formation in machined components.
As chamfering was a secondary operation it cannot
be included as in-process inspection.
8. MODIFIED PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
RAW MATERIAL
INGOTS &
MELTING IN
FURNACE
CASTINGS FETTLING
DRILLING &
TAPPING
CHAMFERING
CNC MACHINING &
BUSH PRESSING
INPROCESS
INSPECTION
FINAL INSPECTION PACKING &
DISPATCH
9. ADVANTAGES OVER THIS
METHOD
Components are not damaged.
Process flow can be much easier.
Reduction in In-House Rejection & cost.
In-process inspection can be done for all
parameters including chamfering.
No dust formation in outer diameter.
11. CONCLUSION
Modified process flow intimated to the customer.
Pilot Lot submitted to the customer with proper
documents (P-PAP).
Critical parameters are inspected and found to be
Ok.
Improved method on Quality and reduced
rejections towards PPM.