BMIS 530Systems Analysis and Redesign Project Phase 3Assignme

BMIS 530
Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 3
Assignment Instructions
Overview
Recall the three stages of the project:
Phase 1: Introduction, problem statement, feasibility study, and
project plan
Phase 2: Methodology to compare the old and new systems and
the systems analysis
Phase 3: Results of comparison of the old and new systems and
the systems design
In Phase 3 you will use the methodology developed in Phase 2
to compare the old information system analysis and design to
the new information system that is cloud-capable, highly
available, scalable, and secure. You will use the scholarly
supported computing framework and standards (e.g. ANSI,
COBIT, ISO, ITU, NIST, HIPAA, PCI) to benchmark the
systems analysis and design of the old and new system. Once
you perform this comparison, you will detail the results.
Instructions
This report must contain the following elements:
I. See the grading rubric for all minimums.
II. Cover page
III. Table of Contents (TOC)
IV. Every section must be well supported with scholarly
information systems journal articles.
V. Introduction and conclusion sections
a. Please update your previous introduction and conclusion
sections as appropriate
b. A succinct, high quality, and well supported introduction and
conclusion should be written
c. It is necessary to highlight the objectives and conclusions of

the project
d. Introduce the primary goals of this particular phase, the
coinciding objectives, and the outcomes
e. The conclusion should be the last heading and conclude the
current phase and state the upcoming objectives and
deliverables in the next phase.
VI. Systems analysis and design results
a. Follows a well-supported methodology including at least one
framework and appropriate standards from scholarly journal
articles
b. Uses objective standards accurately to benchmark the old
system and the new system
c. Minimal comparison elements should include system:
i. Cloud/distributed computing capabilities
ii. High availability
iii. Scalability
iv. Security
v. Note, these are projected based upon the comparative
benchmarked standards
d. A final updated financial analysis that projects associated
costs of both systems once the final design is completed
e. Discuss the managerial implications of the results
f. Uses excel spreadsheets, graphs, figures, and tables to show
the objective comparisons of the systems
VII. Systems design diagrams
a. A minimum of two diagrams (2) are necessary for each
required type, one diagram represents the existing system and
one diagram represents the new re-designed and improved
system
b. The following systems design diagrams are required that
compare the old and new systems:
i. Entity relationship data model diagrams
ii. Class diagrams
iii. User interface forms
iv. Distributed computing network and system architecture
diagrams

1. Design the complete information system architecture
environment for the old and new environments
c. Screenshots are required for each diagram with a visible
operating system date/time and unique desktop element showing
that indicates it is your computer
i. No credit will be given for diagrams without screenshots
ii. Include the screenshots in appendices in the project report
d. Describe the systems analysis as you complete it in a
narrative form and link in each associated diagram referenced in
the narrative using an appendix
e. Each diagram will be assessed according to UML standards
and a level of detail that excels beyond textbook examples
i. Note, textbook examples are simpler versions meant to learn
and not as complex as industry diagrams often
ii. Our textbook is a graduate version of systems analysis and
design. If you need more undergraduate textbook support we
encourage you to use Safari e-books from the Liberty Library.
Our undergraduate textbook develops the more foundational
SAD learning using the textbook:
1. Dennis, A., Wixom, B. H., & Tegarden, D. (2015). Systems
analysis & design: An object-oriented approach with UML (5th
ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the
Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction
and
conclusion

10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
The introduction is
succinct and embodies
the project’s primary
objectives and
outcomes. The
introduction constructs
the purpose of the
system. A compelling
and justifiable
conclusion is
developed that
supports the key
outcomes. More than
5 scholarly sources
and 500 words
combined.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
The introduction and
conclusion are succinct
and embody most of the
project’s primary
objectives and
outcomes, and/or the
an unclear purpose of
the system. Justified
conclusion developed.
Minimum of 5 scholarly

sources and 500 words.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The introduction and/or
conclusion are
generalized and embody
some of the project’s
primary objectives and
outcomes and/or has
less than the minimum of
5 scholarly sources and
500 words and/or is not
defensible.
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially
unmet or not
present
10 pts
Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 3 Grading Rubric
|
BMIS530_D01_202230
Systems

analysis and
design
comparison
results
40 to >36.0 pts
Advanced
Systems analysis and
design results compare
key benchmarks
including cloud
computing capabilities,
high-availability,
scalability, and level of
security of the old and
newly designed
information systems
using relevant graphs,
tables, and figures. A
detailed process that
follows the selected
computing
methodology,
framework, and uses
the appropriate
standards exists.
There are scholarly
supported comparison
methods to contrast the
systems. Financial
analysis is included
that compares the two
system designs from a
managerial standpoint.

Over 1,500 words and
10 unique scholarly
journal articles from the
literature review that
justify the results and
validity of the
comparative analysis.
36 to >33.0 pts
Proficient
design results compare
some benchmarks
including cloud
computing capabilities,
high-availability,
newly designed
information systems
tables, and figures
and/or processes that
follow the selected
computing methodology
exist with some
scholarly supported
comparison methods to
contrast the systems
and/or financial analysis
is included that
compares the two
system designs from a
managerial standpoint

and/or there is a
minimum of 1,500 words
and 10 unique scholarly
validity of the
33 to >0.0 pts
Developing
design results miss
benchmarks including
cloud computing
capabilities,
high-availability,
newly designed
information systems
tables, and figures
and/or processes do not
follow the selected
computing methodology
and/or there is
insufficient scholarly
supported comparison
methods to contrast the
systems and/or financial
analysis does not
adequately compare the
two system designs from

a managerial standpoint
and/or there is not a
minimum of 1,500 words
and 10 unique scholarly
validity of the
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially
unmet or not
present
and/or
quotes more
than 5% of
the writing or
use of
existing
information
system
40 pts
|
BMIS530_D01_202230

Systems
analysis and
design
90 to >82.0 pts
Advanced
ER data model (2),
class diagrams (2), UIs
(2), and architecture
diagrams (2) are more
thorough and detailed
than the textbook
examples, follow
appropriate and
advanced UML
techniques, and meet
comparative industry
best practices and
standards. Diagrams
show an extensive
knowledge of the
system being
designed. ER data
model diagrams meet
3NF, have at least 5
tables each, have
accurate primary and
foreign keys, accurate
field types, and proper
cardinality. Minimum of
5 classes and 15
functions and methods
exist in each class
diagram. UIs follow

industry HCI standards.
Architecture diagrams
include accurate
routers, switches,
firewalls, load
balancers, servers,
databases, storage
area networks,
middleware, and other
appropriate systems for
cloud computing.
82 to >75.0 pts
Proficient
ER data model (2),
class diagrams (2), UIs
(2), and architecture
diagrams (2) are as
detailed as the textbook
examples, mostly follow
appropriate and
advanced UML
best practices and
standards and/or
diagrams show an
knowledge of the
system being designed
and/or ER data model
diagrams meet 3NF,
have at least 5 tables
each, have mostly
accurate primary and

foreign keys, accurate
field types, and proper
cardinality and/or a
minimum of 5 classes
and 10 functions and
methods exist in each
class diagram and/or
UIs follow some industry
HCI standards and/or
architecture diagrams
include mostly accurate
routers, switches,
firewalls, load balancers,
servers, databases,
storage area networks,
cloud computing.
75 to >0.0 pts
Developing
ER data model (2), class
diagrams (2), UIs (2),
and architecture
diagrams (2) are not as
examples and/or do not
follow appropriate UML
techniques and/or meet
best practices and
standards and/or
diagrams do not show
knowledge of the system

being designed and/or
ER data model diagrams
fail to meet 3NF, have at
least 5 tables each, have
mostly accurate primary
and foreign keys,
accurate field types,
and/or proper cardinality
and/or less than a
minimum of 5 classes
and 10 functions and
methods exist in each
class diagram and/or UIs
do not follow industry
HCI standards and/or
architecture diagrams do
not include accurate
routers, switches,
firewalls, load balancers,
servers, databases,
storage area networks,
cloud computing.
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially
unmet or not
present or
proper
screenshots
do not exist
for each

diagram or
use of
existing
information
system
90 pts
|
BMIS530_D01_202230
APA,
Grammar,
and Spelling
20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
Properly formatted APA
paper with table of
contents and
references pages.
Correct spelling and
grammar used.
Contains fewer than 2
errors in grammar or
spelling that distract
the reader from the
content and/or minimal
errors (1-2) noted in the

interpretation or
execution of proper
APA format. Excellent
organization, headings,
and flow of the main
concepts exist.
17 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
Paper contains fewer
than 5 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from
the content and/or some
interpretation or
execution of proper APA
format and/or
inadequate organization,
headings, and flow of
the main concepts exist
and/or notable absences
in required APA
formatting elements
such as: Title page,
running head, font type
and size (Times New
Roman 12 point), and
line spacing.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing

than 10 errors in
the content and/or
numerous errors (7+)
noted in the
interpretation or
format and/or inadequate
concepts exist and/or
notable absences in
required APA formatting
elements such as: Title
page, running head, font
type and size (Times
New Roman 12 point),
and line spacing.
0 pts
Not Present
Paper
contains
more than 10
errors in
grammar or
spelling that
distract the
reader from
the content
and/or
numerous

errors (10+)
noted in the
interpretation
or execution
of proper
APA format
and/or
inadequate
organization,
headings,
and flow of
the main
concepts
exist.
20 pts
Overall
Requirements
40 to >36.0 pts
Advanced
Over 2,000 words and
8 diagrams exist of
original student
authorship that shows
excellent mastery and
knowledge of systems
analysis and design.
Over 10 unique
scholarly peer reviewed
journal articles from
well-respected IT
journals exist that

directly relate to and
sufficiently support an
operational systems
36 to >33.0 pts
Proficient
Minimum of 2,000 words
and 8 diagrams exist of
original student
mastery and knowledge
of systems analysis and
design and/or a
minimum of 10 unique
well-respected IT
journals exist that relate
to and sufficiently
support an operational
systems analysis and
design.
33 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Less than 2,000 words
original student

design and/or there are
less than 10 unique
well-respected IT
journals that relate to
and sufficiently support
an operational systems
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially
unmet or not
present or
proper
screenshots
do not exist
for each
diagram or
use of
existing
information
system
40 pts
Total Points: 200
|
BMIS530_D01_202230

BMIS 530-D01-
Systems Analysis and Redesign: Phase 1
Systems Analysis, Modeling, and Design (D01),
Paruvelli, Praneeth Kumar
Liberty University
James Dollens 2022, July 04
2
Table of Contents
Introduction
...............................................................................................
..................................... 3

Problem statement
...............................................................................................
........................... 3
Feasibility Study and Project Plan
...............................................................................................
... 6
Feasibility
...............................................................................................
..................................... 6
Project Schedule
...............................................................................................
........................... 7
Cost Analysis
...............................................................................................
............................... 7
Conclusion
...............................................................................................
....................................... 9
Reference
...............................................................................................
....................................... 11
3

Systems Analysis and Redesign: Phase 1
Introduction
I am currently working on developing a web-based system for
my church as part of my
project to analyze and redesign existing computer systems. This
will give a solid foundation for
organizing the attendees of the church service in accordance
with who arrives first. The strange
behavior that COVID has displayed over the course of the past
two years served as inspiration
for the design of this system. Because of the pandemic, the
majority of Christians were unable to
attend worship services on Sundays, and they would miss doing
so. It is necessary to take many
precautions to ensure people's safety before they will feel
comfortable attending church again.
One of these measures is ensuring compliance with the
standards for social distance and the
maximum number of people who are permitted to live in a
single house at any given time. In
order to provide assistance with this matter, I devised a system
that enables churches to ascertain
the number of vacant seats and enables individuals to register

for those vacant seats. In the book
of Isaiah, chapter 43, verse 19, says, "Behold, I am doing
something new!" Do you not
acknowledge it now that it has been established? I am currently
planning out how I will get
through the wasteland and the streams to get to where I need to
go.
Problem Statement
As a result of COVID's loosening of its rules, an increasing
number of churches have
reopened their doors. This has resulted in the difficul t situation
of determining how to reopen in
a safe and effective manner while yet ensuring the protection of
the general population. Because
of this question, I ended up designing the software service that
is being suggested. It is difficult
for churches to comprehend and act in accordance with the
many criteria that are imposed by
each state. In the most recent few weeks, limitations have been
removed from all parts of the
country. Despite this, protecting churches should continue to be
a primary priority, given that

4
the vast majority of churchgoers are senior citizens who are
more likely to be infected by the
virus. According to the findings of a poll that was carried out
not too long ago by the Pew
Research Center, an increasing number of houses of worship,
including churches, are continuing
to hold their services in the same manner that they did prior to
the outbreak. Despite this, the
number of people in the United States who attend services in
person has not increased at a
commensurate rate (Nortey, 2022).
I have some suggestions to make in response to the challenges
that have been presented
by both worshipers and churches.
The difficult task at hand is to devise a system that not only
notifies churches of regional social
distance norms but also enables worshipers to reserve space in
accordance with the capacity of
the church and their social distance from it. This system is
going to be web-based, which will
make its construction easier and more cost-effective.
Additionally, it will be hosted on the

platform of a cloud service provider, which will result in cost
savings for churches. Because I
wanted it to be user-friendly and available to other
congregations, I decided to go with a cloud-
hosted, web-based system instead of a traditional one. The
following is a list of some of the most
important advantages:
• An improved user experience: Using a responsive design
makes it much easier and less
expensive to make a web-based system available across a
number of devices and screen sizes.
This leads to an improved user experience.
• A Flexible Connection: Employees who have access to the
internet are able to work from
virtually any location.
• Secure Client Login: Impress your consumers by providing
them with a cutting-edge web
portal while at the same time automating processes to provide
better customer care.
5

• It is simple to configure, and the process of adding a new user
takes only a few minutes to
complete. The only required information is the web site's URL,
user name, and password.
• Everyone always has access to the most recent version of the
web application since
everyone uses the same URL to access the same version of the
web application.
• An increase in the amount of space that can be stored is
possible because of the cloud's ease of
use; because of this, the quantity of space that can be stored is
almost unbounded.
Amazon Web Services (AWS), which operates as a cloud
service provider, would be utilized for
the solution that we have proposed (Amazon Web Services).
AWS was chosen because it
presented the fewest obstacles to our plans. They are the leading
service provider, and they make
it easy to respond to increased demand by expanding their
business. Since the market for cloud
services has expanded and become more appealing to
businesses, it has become increasingly

difficult to decide which provider offers the best products and
services. Taking into
consideration the many advantages of using AWS, we can
observe that they "provide a large
array of services, including processing power, database engines,
authentication resources, data
migration services, and storage solutions" (Velez, 2021).
The websites that churches use nowadays are either
commercially available, pre-made, or free.
In order to register Usually, these websites do not have a high
level of specialization, and they
are established in order to make it possible for individuals to
rapidly register for any event that
is being presented by a person or group. As a consequence of
this, our system would concentrate
more on providing service to churches. It would be a waste of
time and money to redo the
signup process when our system has the potential to be a "set it
and forget it" system that can be
adjusted to the level of computer expertise possessed by the
staff members of the church. In
addition to this, there would no longer be a requirement for
persons to provide estimates

6
regarding the capacity of a certain religious facility. According
to a passage in the Bible,
"Whoever brings blessing will be blessed, and whoever waters
will be watered," whoever waters
will also be blessed. Our assistance to places of worship will
prove to be very beneficial to such
organizations. Proverbs 11:25.
Feasibility Study and Project Plan
Feasibility
The majority of churches still use antiquated websites that offer
a free version of event
scheduling, despite the fact that such websites are unable to
manage the volume of data
necessary for an efficient system. The most fundamental issue
with the church's existing systems
is that they are not scalable and do not contain up-to-date
information on the most recent
iteration of COVID standards; our proposed solution al so
suffers from this shortcoming. In

addition, the system will be more scalable, and weekly signup
sheets won't be necessary because
everything will be hosted in the cloud.
By using the right tools, such as.NET and C#, to design the
system shouldn't be too
challenging of a task. Because they are more modern than other
approaches to the development
of websites and have the capacity to include security directly
into the code, I decided to design
the system using these techniques and languages rather than any
others. Cloud hosting will not
only give data backup but will also provide the same level of
web security as a large organization
because the website will be housed on Amazon's AWS servers.
The monthly cost of cloud
hosting for the website will be the component of the solution
that will be the most expensive to
implement. The entire cost to the church should not surpass the
monthly cost of hosting the
application on an Amazon Web Services (AWS) server;
however, this cost may vary depending
on the level of personalization that is desired by each individual
church. The registration
procedure for end-users will be brief and uncomplicated, which

will result in an increase in the
7
number of individuals using it. PDFs that resemble training
manuals will be provided to the
church team that will be inputting data into the system. These
PDFs will be straightforward, easy
to understand, and will satisfy the constraints placed on the user
by the user.
Project Schedule
We will use the waterfall development approach, and the
timetable that is presented
below, in order to create the web-based application. During the
phase of analysis, we will be able
to build a comprehensive program that is capable of catering to
the requirements of a number of
different congregations. In waterfall project management, a
project is broken down into a series
of distinct and logical steps, and the process of moving on to
the next step does not begin until
the one that came before it is finished. The waterfall
methodology was chosen since the system

would be created by a small team and will not require regular
client input because it will mostly
be used out-of-the-box. These factors contributed to the
decision to go with the waterfall
methodology.
Cost Analysis
According to WebFX, the average cost of creating a website
range from $12,000 to
$150,000, while the average cost of keeping a website up and
running ranges from $400,000 to
$600,000. The price of creating a website is heavily influenced
by the features it possesses, the
number of pages it contains, and the way it appears. If you
utilize a free website builder, you can
save money on the cost of registering a domain and purchasing
an SSL certificate by doing so
together. A monthly fee of between $15 and $300 will be
required to access a platform with
additional options.
In addition to the other expenses, hosting is a significant
financial burden. Web hosting
is included in the cost of proprietary software; therefore, you
only need to factor it into your

budget if you choose an open-source alternative or if you are
building your website from the
ground up. Price points for shared, managed, virtual private
server (VPS) and dedicated hosting
8
packages typically range from $3 to $400 per month across the
majority of web hosting
providers. Shared hosting is the most affordable type of web
hosting since it allows multiple
websites to share a single server. Because you have your very
own server, dedicated hosting
comes at the highest price.
Regardless of where you choose to host your website, you are
required to purchase a
domain name. Because it is your Internet address, it is an
essential component of your presence
on the internet. People will have an easier time remembering
your brand, and they will have a
better impression of the reliability of your website if you utilize
the same domain name as your
business does. The standard annual fee for registering and
renewing a custom domain is twelve

dollars. However, fees are subject to change depending on a
variety of parameters, including
domain privacy, domain extension; registration term; domain
registration; and registration term.
Online signup sites for churches can range in price from free
with minimal capabilities to
$50 to $200 per month. Most churches utilize the free version.
However, the technology that we
are developing is tailored specifically to the needs of churches
and is designed for them. These
websites give off the impression of being excellent locations for
businesses to advertise an event
and try to convince users to upgrade to the paid version. It gives
churches the opportunity to
comply with the regulations governing the holding of indoor
gatherings in their respective states
by paying attention to what the CDC and other regulatory
bodies have to say about the matter.
Church personnel will profit more from utilizing it even if it is
impossible to put a monetary
value on the amount of time that will be saved by using it.
9

10
Conclusion
The current pandemic has not only demonstrated that some
system reforms are
necessary, but it has also brought to several light demands that
were previously unknown.
Therefore, the purpose of this project is to provide assistance to
churches in reaching out to their
communities in a secure and efficient manner and to provide
vital information to the
congregations of those churches in the event of a lockdown in
the future. The next thing that
needs to be done on the agenda for this project is to investigate
the many outdated systems that

churches have been utilizing, determine the ways in which our
solution would be superior, and
calculate the total opportunity cost. Building this system would
save a lot of time and money, in
my opinion, because it would be the only system for churches
that adequately addresses this
issue. This conclusion was reached based on the findings of
research into the feasibility of the
project and an analysis of the AS-IS systems used by the
churches.
11
References
Nortey J. More houses of worship are returning to normal

operations, but in-person attendance
has been unchanged since fall. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/facttank/2022/03/22/more-houses-
of-worship-are-returning-
to-normal-operations-but-inperson-attendance-is-unchanged-
since-fall/. Published April
13, 2022. Accessed May 18, 2022.
Advantages and disadvantages - web apps. Objective.
https://objectiveit.com/blog/theadvantages-and-disadvantages-
of-web-apps/. Published
October 14, 2021. Accessed May 19, 2022.
Velez G. Why choose AWS Cloud For Your Web Application?
ClickIT.
https://www.clickittech.com/aws/why-aws-cloud/. Published
December 22, 2021.
Accessed May 19, 2022.
Solution
s for a safe church during COVID-19. Horst Construction.

https://www.horstconstruction.com/news-and-blog/6-creative-
ways-to-safely-reach-
yourcongregation-during-covid-19/. Published September 10,
2021. Accessed May 20,
2022.
Fitzgerald A. Website costs: How much you need to build &
manage your own. HubSpot Blog.
https://blog.hubspot.com/website/how-much-website-cost.
Published October 4, 2021.
Accessed May 22, 2022.
BMIS 530
Systems Analysis and Redesign Project: Phase 2
Assignment Instructions
Overview
Recall the three stages of the project:

Phase 1: Introduction, problem statement, feasibility study, and
project plan
Phase 2: Methodology to compare the old and new systems and
the systems analysis
Phase 3: Results of comparison of the old and new systems and
the systems design
In Phase 2 you will develop a methods section, similar to a
research methods section of a journal article, that highlights the
framework and standards you will use to compare the old
information system analysis and design to the new information
system that is cloud-capable, highly available, scalable, and
secure. You will use the methods section as a means to compare
the two systems.
Instructions
This report must contain the following elements:
I. See the grading rubric for all minimums.
II. Cover page
III. Table of Contents (TOC)
IV. Every section must be well supported with scholarly
information systems journal articles.
V. Introduction and conclusion sections
a. Please update your previous introduction and conclusion
sections as appropriate

b. A succinct, high quality, and well supported introduction and
conclusion should be written
c. It is necessary to highlight the objectives and conclusions of
the project
d. Introduce the primary goals of this particular phase, the
coinciding objectives, and the outcomes
e. The conclusion should be the last heading and conclude the
current phase and state the upcoming objectives and
deliverables in the next phase.
VI. Literature review and systems analysis and design
methodology
a. Constructs a well-supported review of literature related to the
problem
b. Develops a proper systems analysis and design comparison
methodology in which to benchmark and test the information
system
c. Details and supports the objective framework(s) and
standards that will be used to compare the old and new systems
d. Uses the frameworks’ process accurately
VII. Systems analysis diagrams
a. A minimum of two diagrams (2) are necessary for each
required type, one diagram represents the existing system and
one diagram represents the new re-designed and improved
system
b. The following systems analysis diagrams are required:

i. Use case diagrams for the old system and new system
ii. Written use cases (also known as use case descriptions) for
the old system and new system
iii. Activity diagrams for the old system and new system
iv. Sequence diagrams for the old system and new system
c. Screenshots are required for each diagram with a visibl e
operating system date/time and unique desktop element showing
that indicates it is your computer
i. No credit will be given for diagrams without screenshots
ii. Include the screenshots in appendices in the project report
d. Describe the systems analysis as you complete it in a
narrative form and link in each associated diagram referenced in
the narrative using an appendix
e. Each diagram will be assessed according to UML standards
and a level of detail that excels beyond textbook examples
i. Note, textbook examples are simpler versions meant to learn
and not as complex as industry diagrams often
ii. Our textbook is a graduate version of systems analysis and
design. If you need more undergraduate textbook support we
encourage you to use Safari e-books from the Liberty Library.
Our undergraduate textbook develops the more foundational
SAD learning using the textbook:
1. Dennis, A., Wixom, B. H., & Tegarden, D. (2015). Systems
analysis & design: An object-oriented approach with UML (5th
ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the
Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
Introduction
and
conclusion
10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
The introduction is
succinct and embodies
the project’s primary
objectives and
outcomes. The

the purpose of the
system. A compelling
and justifiable
conclusion is developed
that supports the key
outcomes. More than 5
scholarly sources and
500 words combined.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
The introduction and
conclusion are succinct
and embody most of the
project’s primary
objectives and
outcomes, and/or the
an unclear purpose of
the system. Justified
conclusion developed.
Minimum of 5 scholarly
sources and 500 words.

7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The introduction and/or
conclusion are
generalized and embody
some of the project’s
primary objectives and
outcomes and/or has
less than the minimum
of 5 scholarly sources
and 500 words and/or is
not defensible.
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially
unmet or not
present
10 pts

Literature
review and
systems
design
methods
50 to >45.0 pts
Advanced
design literature review
and methodology is
accurate, feasible, and
addresses the key
deliverables of the
project including a
highly innovative,
available, scalable, and
secure information
systems cloud solution.
Literature results and
methods are properly
contrasted and are

specific and relevant to
the problem. They detail
the standards used and
how these will
benchmark the
systems. Over 2,000
words and 15 unique
scholarly journal articles
that justify the
methodology, its
reliability, and its validity
in comparing and
contrasting the
information systems.
45 to >41.0 pts
Proficient
and methodology is
mostly accurate,
feasible, and addresses
the key deliverables of

the project including a
highly innovative,
available, scalable, and
secure information
systems cloud solution
and/or literature results
and methods are
contrasted and
somewhat specific and
relevant to the problem
and/or detail some
standards used and
how these will
benchmark the systems
and/or minimum of
2,000 words and 15
unique scholarly journal
articles that justify the
methodology, its
in comparing and
contrasting the
41 to >0.0 pts

Developing
and methodology is not
always accurate,
feasible, and/or is
missing the key
deliverables of the
project including a highly
innovative, available,
scalable, and secure
information systems
cloud solution and/or
literature results and
methods are not
contrasted and/or not
specific and/or relevant
to the problem and/or
benchmarking is
inadequate and/or less
than 2,000 words and 15
unique scholarly journal
articles that justify the

methodology, its
in comparing and
contrasting the
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially
unmet or not
present
and/or
quotes more
than 5% of
the writing or
use of
existing
information
system
50 pts

|
BMIS530_D01_202230
Systems
analysis and
design
80 to >73.0 pts
Advanced
Use case diagrams (2),
written use cases / use
case descriptions (2),
activity diagrams (2),
and sequence diagrams
(2) are more thorough
and detailed than the
textbook examples,
follow appropriate and
advanced UML

best practices and
standards. Diagrams
show an extensive
knowledge of the
system being designed.
Minimum of 5 success
scenarios and 10
extensions exist in each
use case along with
proper sub-flows and
alternatives. Minimum
of 10 activities exist with
accurate associated
decisions, swim lanes,
guards, parallel
activities, and proper
object-oriented
strategies to address
distributed computing.
Minimum of 5 objects
exist in each sequence
diagram with accurate
associated lifelines,

execution occurrences,
messages, frames,
guards, functions,
loops, and proper
object-oriented
73 to >66.0 pts
Proficient
and/or sequence
diagrams (2) are as
examples, follow
appropriate and
advanced UML
best practices and

standards and/or
diagrams show
knowledge of the
system being designed.
Most minimums are met
including 5 success
scenarios and 10
extensions in each use
case along with proper
sub-flows and
alternatives and/or 10
activities exist with
accurate associated
guards, parallel
object-oriented
distributed computing
and/or the minimum of 5
objects exist in each
sequence diagram with
mostly accurate
associated lifelines,

messages, frames,
guards, functions,
loops, and proper
object-oriented
66 to >0.0 pts
Developing
and/or sequence
diagrams (2) are not as
examples and/or do not
follow appropriate UML
techniques and/or do not
meet comparative
industry best practices
and standards and/or
diagrams fail to show

knowledge of the system
being designed and/or
minimums are not met
including 5 success
scenarios and 10
extensions in each use
case along with proper
sub-flows and
alternatives and/or 10
activities exist with
accurate associated
guards, parallel
object-oriented
distributed computing
and/or the minimum of 5
objects does not exist in
each sequence diagram
with associated lifelines,
messages, frames,
guards, functions, loops,
and proper

object-oriented
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially
unmet or not
present or
proper
screenshots
do not exist
for each
diagram or
use of
existing
information
system
80 pts
|

BMIS530_D01_202230
APA,
Grammar,
and Spelling
20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
Properly formatted APA
paper with table of
contents and references
pages. Correct spelling
and grammar used.
Contains fewer than 2
errors in grammar or
spelling that distract the
reader from the content
and/or minimal errors
(1-2) noted in the

interpretation or
format. Excellent
concepts exist.
17 to >16.0 pts
Proficient
than 5 errors in
the content and/or some
interpretation or
format and/or
inadequate
concepts exist and/or
notable absences in

required APA formatting
elements such as: Title
page, running head, font
type and size (Times
New Roman 12 point),
and line spacing.
16 to >0.0 pts
Developing
than 10 errors in
the content and/or
numerous errors (7+)
noted in the
interpretation or
format and/or
inadequate organization,
headings, and flow of
the main concepts exist
and/or notable absences

in required APA
formatting elements
such as: Title page,
running head, font type
and size (Times New
Roman 12 point), and
line spacing.
0 pts
Not Present
Paper
contains
more than 10
errors in
grammar or
spelling that
distract the
reader from
the content
and/or
numerous
errors (10+)
noted in the

interpretation
or execution
of proper
APA format
and/or
inadequate
organization,
headings,
and flow of
the main
concepts
exist.
20 pts
Overall
Requirements
40 to >36.0 pts
Advanced
Over 2,500 words and 8
diagrams exist of
original student

excellent mastery and
knowledge of systems
Over 15 unique
well-respected IT
journals exist that
directly relate to and
sufficiently support an
operational systems
36 to >33.0 pts
Proficient
Minimum of 2,500
words and 8 diagrams
exist of original student
design. 15 unique

well-respected IT
journals exist that relate
to and sufficiently
support an operational
systems analysis and
design.
33 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Less than 2,500 words
original student
design and/or there are
less than 15 unique
well-respected IT
journals that relate to

and sufficiently support
an operational systems
0 pts
Not Present
Substantially
unmet or not
present or
proper
screenshots
do not exist
for each
diagram or
use of
existing
information
system
40 pts
Total Points: 200

|
BMIS530_D01_202230
Compensation
Chapter 18a - Assignment
Scenario: Martha, an RN that has been working at XYZ hospital
for the last 20 years as a nurse and is very familiar with many
aspects of the hospital at various levels of operation. She has
served in administration when the hospital needed the coverage
and also spent many years as a nurse working in the unit where
she is working now.
Recently the hospital administration announced a 2% pay
increase for all employees. Several of Martha’s colleagues
believe that this is a generous raise especially considering the
economy of the country which has been fairly poor lately.
Others consider the raise a slap in the face considering the hard
work that they all have contributed to in the last year.
Also, a successful JCAHO survey accreditation with
accommodation only 3 months ago and several community
awards pointing out the great work the nurses have done both in
the hospital and in the community. Although these all
demonstrated the dedication and outstanding nature of the
nurses in the hospital, it has been a sticking point for many of

the nurses because they feel that the 2% raise is being shared
among other employees in the hospital, and, a 2% raise after
taxes and divided by 2080 hours is about 25 cents an hour for
most of the nurses in the hospital.
Furthermore, Martha being a trusted individual among
administrators and nurses alike has found herself in a difficult
position because many people in the hospital are asking her to
weigh in on the recent raise.
Instructions:
1. Read the scenario above.
2. Then, answer the following questions below:
a. How do you feel Martha should handle it when she is asked
about the recent raise?
b. Is there any action that administration could find to recognize
the nurses and the hard work they have performed in the last
year?
c. Is there any problem with these solutions that you might
anticipate?
d. Summarize what you have learned about internal/external
rewards from the readings in the textbook, and then, discuss
how this might fit into the scenario at XYZ hospital.
3. Your paper should be:
· One (1) page
· Typed according to APA style for margins, formatting, and
spacing standards

· Typed into a Microsoft Word document, save the file, and then
upload the file
4. Upload your file by clicking "Browse My Computer" for
Attach File.
Page 2 of 2 Leadership and
Management Theory

BMIS 530Systems Analysis and Redesign Project Phase 3Assignme

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to BMIS 530Systems Analysis and Redesign Project Phase 3Assignme

Similar to BMIS 530Systems Analysis and Redesign Project Phase 3Assignme (12)

More from JeniceStuckeyoo

More from JeniceStuckeyoo (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

BMIS 530Systems Analysis and Redesign Project Phase 3Assignme