Blue Button Co-Design Challenge
Informational Webinar
6.19.13
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
1
On Today’s Call:
• Adam Wong, Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT
• Rebecca Mitchell-Coelius, Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT
• Patricia Salber, Health Tech Hatch
• Jean-Luc (“JL”) Neptune, Health 2.0
• Graeme Ossey, Health 2.0
Agenda:
• Challenge Background and Goals
• Blue Button Overview
• Crowdsourcing ideas
• Overview of Challenge Details
• Q&A
ONC and i2 Goals
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
2
• Better Health, Better Care, Better Value through Quality
Improvement
– Further the mission of the Department of Health and Human
Services
– Highlight programs, activities, and issues of concern
• Spur Innovation and Highlight Excellence
– Motivate, inspire, and lead
• Community building – Development of ecosystem
• Stimulate private sector investment
A Brief History
• First used by VA in 2010 on the myHealtheVet
portal. 1 million downloads in first year.
• Adopted by CMS, DoD, Aetna, United, and others
• = Potential access to 1/3 of country!!
Patients: the Most Underutilized
Part of the Health System
Only 10% to 20% of outcomes are determined by health care.
Patient Engagement = Better Care
6
Suffer a health consequence from
poor communcation among providers
Experience a Medical Error
Hospital Readmit within 30 Days
36%
28%
13%
19%
13%
More Activated Patient
Less Activated Patient
49%
Source: AARP Survey of patients over 50 with 2 or more chronic conditions
Market Opportunity
Source: Rock Health
Meaningful Use Supports
Patient & FamMeaningful ily
EngagementStage 1
2011-2012
Post-Visit
Summary
Stage 2
2014
Secure
Patient
Messaging
+
View,
Download,
Transmit
Stage 3
2016
Patient-
Generated
Health
Info?
+
Blue Button
Plus?
Blue Button
Sample Data Files
VA: CMS:
9
6/19/2013
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
10
6/19/2013
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
11
What’s next?
Liberation
1
MU2
Structure
2
CCDA
Automation
3
Push / Pull
6/19/2013
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
12http://bluebuttonplus.org/
6/19/2013
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
13
Health Tech Hatch
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
14
• Facilitates Patient Codesign:
– Crowdsource ideas
– Patient/Consumer iterative feedback
– Crowdvote winners
• Winning ideas from ideas@healthtechhatch.com
– Link my medical device data with my other health data
– Simplify management of multiple chronic conditions
– Make it easy to add rich contextual information (e.g., living situation, language, dietary &
religious preferences) to my health history
– Help me understand what conditions I am at risk for and what preventive services I need
(and where to get them)
• Next steps
– Post concepts on HealthTechHatch.com
– Engage with patient codesigners over time
– Incorporate feedback that makes sense
Challenge Goals
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
15
• Build support for Blue Button Plus by engaging three crucial
communities:
– Patients through crowd sourcing of application ideas, co-design,
and public voting on winning products
– Companies and application builders through a public
competition and prize money
– Developers by rewarding open source developer tools that
make it easier to build Blue Button Plus enabled applications
• Expand our understanding of how patients want to use
their clinical data, and what products they want to see
developed.
• Increase the number of fully enabled, Blue Button Plus
tools and applications in areas of high priority for patients
Submission Requirements
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
16
Patient Applications:
• Brief Description of the Product
• Slide Deck
• Working Application (.zip file)
Developer Tools
• Brief Description of the Product
• Slide Deck
• GitHub Link
Review Criteria
The winners of the Patient Application category will be determined by a
combination of the review panel (two-thirds) and public voting (one-third);
public voting will be enabled on the co-design site upon closing of the
submission period on August 5.
• Innovative use and integration of Blue Button Plus
• Innovative use of Blue Button patient data
• Application design and ease-of-use
• Relevance to crowd-sourced ideas and participation in co-design
Open Source Developer Tools
• Code readability, maintainability, and extensibility
• Quality of code documentation
• Value added by the tool
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
17
Timeline
Patient Applications
• August 5: Final Submission Due
• August 6-21: Patient Applications review period, by
review panel and public voting
Developer Tools
• July 8: Final Submission Due
• July 9-19: Developer Tools review period
• July 22-26: Announce Developer Tools winners (All
submissions deemed of sufficient quality will be posted
on a public website)
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
18
Prizes
Patient Applications:
First Place $20,000
Second Place $10,000
Third Place $5,000
Developer Tools
Three Best $5,000 each
Not to mention: recognition, publicity, credibility and reach!
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
19
Questions?
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
20
www.health2challenge.com
Contact Graeme:
graeme@health2con.com
Co-design Questions:
www.healthtechhatch.com
info@healthtechhatch.com

Blue Button Co-Design Webinar

  • 1.
    Blue Button Co-DesignChallenge Informational Webinar 6.19.13
  • 2.
    Office of theNational Coordinator for Health Information Technology 1 On Today’s Call: • Adam Wong, Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT • Rebecca Mitchell-Coelius, Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT • Patricia Salber, Health Tech Hatch • Jean-Luc (“JL”) Neptune, Health 2.0 • Graeme Ossey, Health 2.0 Agenda: • Challenge Background and Goals • Blue Button Overview • Crowdsourcing ideas • Overview of Challenge Details • Q&A
  • 3.
    ONC and i2Goals Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 2 • Better Health, Better Care, Better Value through Quality Improvement – Further the mission of the Department of Health and Human Services – Highlight programs, activities, and issues of concern • Spur Innovation and Highlight Excellence – Motivate, inspire, and lead • Community building – Development of ecosystem • Stimulate private sector investment
  • 5.
    A Brief History •First used by VA in 2010 on the myHealtheVet portal. 1 million downloads in first year. • Adopted by CMS, DoD, Aetna, United, and others • = Potential access to 1/3 of country!!
  • 6.
    Patients: the MostUnderutilized Part of the Health System Only 10% to 20% of outcomes are determined by health care.
  • 7.
    Patient Engagement =Better Care 6 Suffer a health consequence from poor communcation among providers Experience a Medical Error Hospital Readmit within 30 Days 36% 28% 13% 19% 13% More Activated Patient Less Activated Patient 49% Source: AARP Survey of patients over 50 with 2 or more chronic conditions
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Meaningful Use Supports Patient& FamMeaningful ily EngagementStage 1 2011-2012 Post-Visit Summary Stage 2 2014 Secure Patient Messaging + View, Download, Transmit Stage 3 2016 Patient- Generated Health Info? + Blue Button Plus?
  • 10.
    Blue Button Sample DataFiles VA: CMS: 9
  • 11.
    6/19/2013 Office of theNational Coordinator for Health Information Technology 10
  • 12.
    6/19/2013 Office of theNational Coordinator for Health Information Technology 11 What’s next? Liberation 1 MU2 Structure 2 CCDA Automation 3 Push / Pull
  • 13.
    6/19/2013 Office of theNational Coordinator for Health Information Technology 12http://bluebuttonplus.org/
  • 14.
    6/19/2013 Office of theNational Coordinator for Health Information Technology 13
  • 15.
    Health Tech Hatch Officeof the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 14 • Facilitates Patient Codesign: – Crowdsource ideas – Patient/Consumer iterative feedback – Crowdvote winners • Winning ideas from ideas@healthtechhatch.com – Link my medical device data with my other health data – Simplify management of multiple chronic conditions – Make it easy to add rich contextual information (e.g., living situation, language, dietary & religious preferences) to my health history – Help me understand what conditions I am at risk for and what preventive services I need (and where to get them) • Next steps – Post concepts on HealthTechHatch.com – Engage with patient codesigners over time – Incorporate feedback that makes sense
  • 16.
    Challenge Goals Office ofthe National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 15 • Build support for Blue Button Plus by engaging three crucial communities: – Patients through crowd sourcing of application ideas, co-design, and public voting on winning products – Companies and application builders through a public competition and prize money – Developers by rewarding open source developer tools that make it easier to build Blue Button Plus enabled applications • Expand our understanding of how patients want to use their clinical data, and what products they want to see developed. • Increase the number of fully enabled, Blue Button Plus tools and applications in areas of high priority for patients
  • 17.
    Submission Requirements Office ofthe National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 16 Patient Applications: • Brief Description of the Product • Slide Deck • Working Application (.zip file) Developer Tools • Brief Description of the Product • Slide Deck • GitHub Link
  • 18.
    Review Criteria The winnersof the Patient Application category will be determined by a combination of the review panel (two-thirds) and public voting (one-third); public voting will be enabled on the co-design site upon closing of the submission period on August 5. • Innovative use and integration of Blue Button Plus • Innovative use of Blue Button patient data • Application design and ease-of-use • Relevance to crowd-sourced ideas and participation in co-design Open Source Developer Tools • Code readability, maintainability, and extensibility • Quality of code documentation • Value added by the tool Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 17
  • 19.
    Timeline Patient Applications • August5: Final Submission Due • August 6-21: Patient Applications review period, by review panel and public voting Developer Tools • July 8: Final Submission Due • July 9-19: Developer Tools review period • July 22-26: Announce Developer Tools winners (All submissions deemed of sufficient quality will be posted on a public website) Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 18
  • 20.
    Prizes Patient Applications: First Place$20,000 Second Place $10,000 Third Place $5,000 Developer Tools Three Best $5,000 each Not to mention: recognition, publicity, credibility and reach! Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 19
  • 21.
    Questions? Office of theNational Coordinator for Health Information Technology 20 www.health2challenge.com Contact Graeme: graeme@health2con.com Co-design Questions: www.healthtechhatch.com info@healthtechhatch.com