COUNTRY REPORT
Pakistan
Situational Analysis
 Long history but still at nascent stage specifically
from sector development perspective
 Around 6000 domestic biogas plant established
 Potential 3 Million
 Government or NGO based
 Private Construction companies trained to install
quality plants, provide 4 years guarantees and after
sales services - (RSPN)
Situational Analysis
 Efforts underway to link with MFIs
 Bio slurry research being conducted with
Universities and Research Institutes
 Biogas appliances are being developed
 Demand driven research, for medium dairy
farmers and tube wells
 Agro processing units shifting to biogas as
energy alternative
NGO/ Government Role
 Majority interventions are subsidized
 Government is planning to install 100,000
biogas plants for replacing diesel run tube
wells
 Govt. Subsidy+ Microfinance+ Farmers
Contributions
 Government will gradually abolish the subsidy
and limits its role to policy formulation and
regulation, facilitation and resource
mobilization
 NGOs will be used for outreach, training and
New Market Stimulation
 Government led innovative policy framework
 Major Govt. driven intervention to kick start the biogas
market sector
 Project cost US $ 300 million
 Payback period one year through energy savings
 Training of 5,000 plus masons and 2,000 technical
supervisors.
 Will galvanize the market for domestic sector
 Opportunities for byproducts markets and carbon credits
 MFIs have products which meet the clients needs
Essentials
 Social mobilization
 Awareness / Advocacy
 Environmental issues
 Partnership of international successful
organizations
 Capacity building / Skill development
 Networking with other stakeholders
Quality Control System
 Absence of National Quality Standards
 Notifying standards of training, certification
and quality control is under process
 3rd party mechanism of quality control
 Risk of becoming number driven instead of
quality control.
 Drop of trained labour
 Ensure continuous supply of trained
manpower
Public Private Partnerships
 Lengthy bureaucratic processes
 Change in political ownership
 Government role be limited to policy
formulation and facilitation
 Management and implementation should be
with private partner
 Strong M&E system and regular reporting
THANK YOU

Biogas pakistan

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Situational Analysis  Longhistory but still at nascent stage specifically from sector development perspective  Around 6000 domestic biogas plant established  Potential 3 Million  Government or NGO based  Private Construction companies trained to install quality plants, provide 4 years guarantees and after sales services - (RSPN)
  • 3.
    Situational Analysis  Effortsunderway to link with MFIs  Bio slurry research being conducted with Universities and Research Institutes  Biogas appliances are being developed  Demand driven research, for medium dairy farmers and tube wells  Agro processing units shifting to biogas as energy alternative
  • 4.
    NGO/ Government Role Majority interventions are subsidized  Government is planning to install 100,000 biogas plants for replacing diesel run tube wells  Govt. Subsidy+ Microfinance+ Farmers Contributions  Government will gradually abolish the subsidy and limits its role to policy formulation and regulation, facilitation and resource mobilization  NGOs will be used for outreach, training and
  • 5.
    New Market Stimulation Government led innovative policy framework  Major Govt. driven intervention to kick start the biogas market sector  Project cost US $ 300 million  Payback period one year through energy savings  Training of 5,000 plus masons and 2,000 technical supervisors.  Will galvanize the market for domestic sector  Opportunities for byproducts markets and carbon credits  MFIs have products which meet the clients needs
  • 6.
    Essentials  Social mobilization Awareness / Advocacy  Environmental issues  Partnership of international successful organizations  Capacity building / Skill development  Networking with other stakeholders
  • 7.
    Quality Control System Absence of National Quality Standards  Notifying standards of training, certification and quality control is under process  3rd party mechanism of quality control  Risk of becoming number driven instead of quality control.  Drop of trained labour  Ensure continuous supply of trained manpower
  • 8.
    Public Private Partnerships Lengthy bureaucratic processes  Change in political ownership  Government role be limited to policy formulation and facilitation  Management and implementation should be with private partner  Strong M&E system and regular reporting
  • 9.