6. Matrix Comparison
PLA
• Hydrolysis
• Cost competitive
• Can become brittle
• Compostable
• Ease of processing
6
PHA
• Water insoluble
• Expensive/hard to obtain
• More durable
• Faster degradation
• Long crystallization time
7. Filler Materials
• Must be:
– Renewable/Bio-based
– Increase degradation or strength properties
– Easily attainable
7
8. Filler Materials
• Soy Polymer
– Developed at ISU
– Pre-extruded
– High nutrient content
• Lignin
– Readily available
– Many side chemistries
• Varies by feedstock
8
9. Filler Materials
• DDGS (Distillers Grains)
– Abundant
– Inexpensive
– Large particle size
• BioRes
– Modified DDGS (Laurel Biocomposites)
– Superior blending to DDGS
9
10. Plasticizer
• Polyethylene glycol
– PEG 8000 @ 10%
• Decrease process temps
– Less denaturing of filler (SPA, BioRes)
• Increase flow and process-ability
• Co-product of biodiesel production
10
13. Processing – Injection Molding
• Arburg 470C
– 165 ton clamping force
– 1.5” screw, 8.2 oz shot
13
• Keep residence time short
• Fillers can impede flow