Oil fires from Bakken Oil train derailments pose a dangerous threat to nearby nuclear plants. This presentation examines the threat potential at Three Mile Island near Harrisburg PA.
On August 19, 2016, the fifth tower and associated nacelle were raised on the Deepwater Wind offshore wind farm, located approximately three miles off Block Island, RI. Deepwater Wind will be the first commercially producing offshore wind farm erected in US waters and, without a doubt, a huge step forward. Commercial development of offshore renewable energy sources such as wind and solar energy call for new equipment like crew-transfer vessels (CTVs), and the corresponding risks must be managed and reallocated with contracts and insurance policies. In this presentation, Mr. David Sharpe discusses US cabotage rules and regulations that apply to vessels which support offshore wind farms and contract terms that can be adapted from existing oilfield service contracts to manage risk in the new offshore energy environment.
Chernobyl Case Study- MBA- Presentation- slidesVineethJose5
The document discusses the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster in the Soviet Union. It provides background on the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and describes how the disaster occurred due to a safety test conducted on April 26, 1986. Serious communication lapses between personnel at different levels contributed to management mistakes and delays in addressing the problems. The summaries highlights how barriers in communication, wrong assumptions, and a reluctance to accept warnings from experts led to the reactor explosion and its devastating aftermath.
Probability Studies of Nuclear Accidents are Flawed - here's why.Scott Portzline
Now that the Fukushima Japan nuclear meltdowns have occurred, it seems that nuclear accidents happen more frequently than previously estimated. This short report shows examples of previous erroneous estimates, and finds 4 common flaws prevalent in projecting nuclear accident frequency.
1. The document criticizes the conclusions of the State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) report conducted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
2. It argues that the SOARCA report was limited in scope by only analyzing a select number of severe accident scenarios and did not consider many real-world factors that could alter the outcomes.
3. The criticisms also question the reliability of the MELCOR software used in the analysis and the NRC's history of producing misleading probabilistic risk assessments.
NRC efforts to improve rulemaking tracking and reportingScott Portzline
TMI Alert says the rulemaking process is broken because there are no clear rules on how to conduct the rulemaking process. Therefore, public participation in regulating nuclear plants is subverted. This presentation shows just how badly the NRC ignores its own guidelines.
35th anniversary of the Three Mile Island accidentScott Portzline
This presentation was given to the members, local officials and guests of Three Mile Island Alert. It updates the member about Three Mile Island, Security and Fukushima. There are several links to video clips worth watching. Radioactive release estimate charts are near the end of the slideshow.
On August 19, 2016, the fifth tower and associated nacelle were raised on the Deepwater Wind offshore wind farm, located approximately three miles off Block Island, RI. Deepwater Wind will be the first commercially producing offshore wind farm erected in US waters and, without a doubt, a huge step forward. Commercial development of offshore renewable energy sources such as wind and solar energy call for new equipment like crew-transfer vessels (CTVs), and the corresponding risks must be managed and reallocated with contracts and insurance policies. In this presentation, Mr. David Sharpe discusses US cabotage rules and regulations that apply to vessels which support offshore wind farms and contract terms that can be adapted from existing oilfield service contracts to manage risk in the new offshore energy environment.
Chernobyl Case Study- MBA- Presentation- slidesVineethJose5
The document discusses the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster in the Soviet Union. It provides background on the Chernobyl nuclear power plant and describes how the disaster occurred due to a safety test conducted on April 26, 1986. Serious communication lapses between personnel at different levels contributed to management mistakes and delays in addressing the problems. The summaries highlights how barriers in communication, wrong assumptions, and a reluctance to accept warnings from experts led to the reactor explosion and its devastating aftermath.
Probability Studies of Nuclear Accidents are Flawed - here's why.Scott Portzline
Now that the Fukushima Japan nuclear meltdowns have occurred, it seems that nuclear accidents happen more frequently than previously estimated. This short report shows examples of previous erroneous estimates, and finds 4 common flaws prevalent in projecting nuclear accident frequency.
1. The document criticizes the conclusions of the State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) report conducted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
2. It argues that the SOARCA report was limited in scope by only analyzing a select number of severe accident scenarios and did not consider many real-world factors that could alter the outcomes.
3. The criticisms also question the reliability of the MELCOR software used in the analysis and the NRC's history of producing misleading probabilistic risk assessments.
NRC efforts to improve rulemaking tracking and reportingScott Portzline
TMI Alert says the rulemaking process is broken because there are no clear rules on how to conduct the rulemaking process. Therefore, public participation in regulating nuclear plants is subverted. This presentation shows just how badly the NRC ignores its own guidelines.
35th anniversary of the Three Mile Island accidentScott Portzline
This presentation was given to the members, local officials and guests of Three Mile Island Alert. It updates the member about Three Mile Island, Security and Fukushima. There are several links to video clips worth watching. Radioactive release estimate charts are near the end of the slideshow.
Police in Louisiana are searching for three suspects in connection with six copper wire thefts totaling $1 million from an oil drilling company. In New York, a subway train derailed with 400 passengers who had to be evacuated. The USDA is investigating how an unauthorized genetically engineered wheat ended up growing in an Oregon field, which could threaten international trade. A former Navy employee pleaded guilty to leading a kickback scheme involving government contractors.
The document summarizes two major nuclear power plant disasters - Chernobyl in 1986 and Three Mile Island in 1979. It describes the causes of the accidents, their impacts, and lessons learned. The Chernobyl accident was caused by flawed reactor design and human error, resulting in a massive uncontrolled radioactive release. It directly caused 28 deaths and long term health impacts. Three Mile Island's partial core meltdown released some radiation but no direct health effects. It highlighted operational and communication issues. Both led to improved global nuclear safety standards and cooperation.
A Case Study of Silkwood vs. Kerr-McGeeIntroduction to the Case.docxsleeperharwell
A Case Study of Silkwood vs. Kerr-McGee
Introduction to the Case: Karen Silkwood was an employee at the Cimarron Fuel Fabrication Site, a site owned and operated by the Kerr-McGee Corporation. A member of the local Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union, she helped lead strikes on the plant, and was elected to the union’s bargaining committee, specifically assigned to negotiate regarding health and safety issues at the plant. Silkwood was specifically working on manufacturing plutonium pellets for Mixed Oxide (MOX) reactors. Throughout the summer of 1974, Silkwood testified to the Atomic Energy Commission that safety standards at the plant had been slipping due to a speedup in production earlier that year. After performing a self-check, Silkwood discovered that her body contained almost 400 times the legal limit for plutonium contamination. After inspecting her normal work station, it was determined that the radiation came from an external source. Her home was inspected and found to have plutonium traces on surfaces specifically within the bathroom and refrigerator. Within a week, she had assembled documentations for claims against the company, and was prepared to go public with a reporter from the New York Times. After a union meeting on November 13, Silkwood left to go meet with the Times journalist. She was found dead later that evening in her car, wrecked off the side of the highway; all of the documents she had gathered were missing from her car. Silkwood’s father, Bill, and her children filed a lawsuit for negligence against Kerr-McGee. The trial was held in 1979, with the defense claiming that the contamination within her body was below the federal limits, and claimed that Silkwood may have intentionally poisoned herself to implicate Kerr-McGee. The judge presiding over the case, Frank Theis, told the jury “If you find that the damage to the person or property of Karen Silkwood resulted from the operation of this plant … defendant Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corporation is liable…”
Technical Concern: The charge is of concern due to the serious implications of the safety standards at the plant not being upheld at a level required by federal regulations. It would raise questions as to what extent other workers at the plant were exposed to the same dose as Silkwood, and if the problems were not just within the plant, and everyone living within the area would also be at risk of exposure. Silkwood alleged that the safety standards at the plant were declining due to an increase in production, therefore she was likely not the only worker at risk due to these lowered standards.
Outcome: The specific law that would have been violated in this case would be 10 CFR 20.1201, which outlines occupational dose limits for adults in the United States. The jury in this case rendered a verdict of $505,000 in damages and an extra $10,000,000 in punitive damages. After an appeal, the judgement was reduced to $5000, and reversing the award of punitive.
Nuclear Reactors, Materials, and Waste CIKR Sector: Case Study of the Nuclea...Lindsey Landolfi
The document provides information about the 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear accident in Pennsylvania through images, maps, and text. It discusses the accident's progression, including the partial meltdown in the reactor core and the release of radioactive gases. It also examines the emergency response, media coverage, investigations conducted afterward, debates around nuclear power, and lingering impacts on public perception and policy.
The Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986 was caused by flawed reactor design and human error. During a test, there was an unexpected power surge and explosions, releasing radiation into the atmosphere. Over 30 emergency responders died immediately from radiation exposure. Over 100,000 people were evacuated and the accident highlighted issues with nuclear safety protocols. It led to increased international cooperation and new conventions to prevent future disasters and improve emergency response.
09 0214 NO To BNPP Bataan Dr. Kelvin Rodolfogtapang
The document discusses several risks and issues associated with nuclear power and reopening the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) in the Philippines. It notes that BNPP is located on an active volcano, Mount Natib, which last erupted 11,000-18,000 years ago. It also discusses the seismic risks, with faulting occurring as recently as 3,000 years ago. The document questions claims that reopening BNPP would only cost $800 million and take 5 years, as the plant would need extensive modernization and safety assessments given its age.
David Ortmann has over 30 years of experience as a general superintendent on numerous overseas construction projects for U.S. embassies and government facilities. He has managed projects in New Zealand, Guyana, Taiwan, Australia, Mongolia, Latvia, Greece, Armenia, Croatia, Ukraine, El Salvador, Dominican Republic, and Egypt. Ortmann received degrees in construction management, business administration, and construction technology, and holds an OSHA safety certificate.
The Chernobyl nuclear disaster occurred on April 26, 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine. During a safety test on reactor 4, a surge of power caused an explosion that blew the reactor apart and released massive amounts of radiation. Hundreds of thousands of people had to be evacuated and the area remains contaminated. The disaster highlighted issues with the Soviet response and lessons about safety culture, emergency preparedness, and open communication.
Nuclear Reactors, Materials, and Waste CIKR Sector: Case Study of the Nuclea...Lindsey Landolfi
The Three Mile Island nuclear accident in 1979 was caused by a series of mechanical failures and human errors that led to a partial meltdown of the reactor core. It highlighted issues with emergency response such as delays in notifying authorities, inconsistent information provided to the public, and a mistaken evacuation order. The accident caused low levels of radiation release but no direct deaths or injuries. It revealed vulnerabilities in nuclear plant safety systems and operator training as well as poor coordination between authorities during the emergency response.
On April 26, 1986, a nuclear meltdown occurred at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine, releasing radioactive material into the atmosphere. The explosion and fire killed up to 50 people initially and may have caused up to 4,000 additional cancer deaths. Radioactive fallout spread as far as Canada. The abandoned city of Prypiat near the plant was contaminated. Over time, hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on cleanup efforts, safety improvements to other Soviet reactors, and aid programs for affected regions in Ukraine, Russia and Belarus.
The Chernobyl disaster occurred on April 26, 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine when a test caused reactor number four to explode. This caused a fire and released radioactive material into the atmosphere. It is estimated that up to 50 people died immediately from the explosion and fire and thousands more may die from cancer in the long run. Radioactive fallout from Chernobyl could be detected as far away as Canada and contaminated areas of Belarus, Russia, Ukraine and parts of Europe. The abandoned city of Prypiat near the plant remains uninhabited due to the contamination. Lessons learned included the need for improved reactor safety standards, especially in Eastern Europe.
The Chernobyl disaster was the worst nuclear disaster in history that occurred in 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Pripyat, Ukraine. Due to a failed safety test and procedural errors, there was an unexpected surge of energy during a reactor systems test that caused an explosion and fire that released large amounts of radioactive material into the atmosphere. The disaster contaminated over 7 million people and large areas of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. It took many years and cost billions of dollars to contain the damage and effects of the radiation releases from the disaster.
This presentation is part of Renewable Energy Technologies course 2020
Faculty of Engineering - Benha University
By
Prof. Ghada Amer
Category
Science & Technology
Category
Science & Technology
Category
Science & Technology
The Chernobyl disaster of 1986 was the worst nuclear power plant accident in history. It was caused by design flaws in the reactor, operational errors during a safety test, lack of proper training, and Soviet secrecy. The explosion and fire released radioactive materials, causing immediate deaths and long-term health issues and environmental contamination. It highlighted the need for improved safety regulations, emergency response plans, and transparency regarding nuclear energy. Ongoing efforts aim to understand and address the disaster's consequences.
The Chernobyl disaster was the worst nuclear power plant accident in history. On April 26, 1986, a safety test caused an uncontrollable nuclear chain reaction in reactor number 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant near Pripyat, Ukraine. Large amounts of radioactive materials were released into the atmosphere and spread over much of the western USSR and Europe. Over 100,000 people were evacuated from the surrounding area. The accident exposed the flaws in the RBMK nuclear reactor design and in the Soviet safety culture. It highlighted the need for robust safety systems, oversight, and transparency to prevent future disasters.
The document summarizes an NTSB report on a 2012 freight train derailment in Paulsboro, New Jersey caused by a movable bridge not being properly locked. Seven cars derailed when the bridge rotated under the moving train, misaligning the rails. Four tank cars entered a creek, with one breaching and releasing 20,000 gallons of vinyl chloride. The report determined the accident was caused by the train crew allowing the train to cross the bridge when the locking mechanism was not fully engaged. Contributing factors included the conductor's lack of training and familiarity with inspecting the bridge locking system. The company did not have an adequate safety program or training to prevent such risks associated with operating the aging bridge, which had
This document summarizes concerns about co-locating high-pressure natural gas pipelines near the Indian Point nuclear power plant. It notes that gas line ruptures pose an extreme risk to the plant but that valid independent risk assessments have not been conducted. Calculations by engineers estimate the blast radius from a rupture would be over 4,000 feet, while the NRC and Entergy calculated a much lower 1,100 feet. It alleges wrongdoing by regulatory agencies in their handling of risk assessments and by the plant operator in providing inaccurate information. Potential consequences of an accident are presented as catastrophic, but regulatory agencies continue to refuse requiring a proper risk evaluation.
The document discusses the establishment of Yucca Mountain in Nevada as the site for permanent storage of nuclear waste in the United States. It describes how the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 designated the Department of Energy to study suitable dump sites. Yucca Mountain was selected in 2002 after extensive geological studies. However, some object to the site due to concerns about earthquakes, volcanic activity and potential groundwater contamination over the next 10,000 years. Seismologists continue monitoring the area to ensure seismic activity levels remain stable.
The Chernobyl disaster was the worst nuclear power plant accident in history. In 1986, a flawed reactor design and human error caused an explosion and fire that released radiation into the atmosphere. Over 30 people died immediately from radiation exposure. The radioactive fallout spread over much of Europe. Long term impacts included increased cancer rates and contamination of surrounding land and water. The disaster demonstrated the importance of safety in nuclear power and providing emergency response plans for such accidents.
Police in Louisiana are searching for three suspects in connection with six copper wire thefts totaling $1 million from an oil drilling company. In New York, a subway train derailed with 400 passengers who had to be evacuated. The USDA is investigating how an unauthorized genetically engineered wheat ended up growing in an Oregon field, which could threaten international trade. A former Navy employee pleaded guilty to leading a kickback scheme involving government contractors.
The document summarizes two major nuclear power plant disasters - Chernobyl in 1986 and Three Mile Island in 1979. It describes the causes of the accidents, their impacts, and lessons learned. The Chernobyl accident was caused by flawed reactor design and human error, resulting in a massive uncontrolled radioactive release. It directly caused 28 deaths and long term health impacts. Three Mile Island's partial core meltdown released some radiation but no direct health effects. It highlighted operational and communication issues. Both led to improved global nuclear safety standards and cooperation.
A Case Study of Silkwood vs. Kerr-McGeeIntroduction to the Case.docxsleeperharwell
A Case Study of Silkwood vs. Kerr-McGee
Introduction to the Case: Karen Silkwood was an employee at the Cimarron Fuel Fabrication Site, a site owned and operated by the Kerr-McGee Corporation. A member of the local Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union, she helped lead strikes on the plant, and was elected to the union’s bargaining committee, specifically assigned to negotiate regarding health and safety issues at the plant. Silkwood was specifically working on manufacturing plutonium pellets for Mixed Oxide (MOX) reactors. Throughout the summer of 1974, Silkwood testified to the Atomic Energy Commission that safety standards at the plant had been slipping due to a speedup in production earlier that year. After performing a self-check, Silkwood discovered that her body contained almost 400 times the legal limit for plutonium contamination. After inspecting her normal work station, it was determined that the radiation came from an external source. Her home was inspected and found to have plutonium traces on surfaces specifically within the bathroom and refrigerator. Within a week, she had assembled documentations for claims against the company, and was prepared to go public with a reporter from the New York Times. After a union meeting on November 13, Silkwood left to go meet with the Times journalist. She was found dead later that evening in her car, wrecked off the side of the highway; all of the documents she had gathered were missing from her car. Silkwood’s father, Bill, and her children filed a lawsuit for negligence against Kerr-McGee. The trial was held in 1979, with the defense claiming that the contamination within her body was below the federal limits, and claimed that Silkwood may have intentionally poisoned herself to implicate Kerr-McGee. The judge presiding over the case, Frank Theis, told the jury “If you find that the damage to the person or property of Karen Silkwood resulted from the operation of this plant … defendant Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corporation is liable…”
Technical Concern: The charge is of concern due to the serious implications of the safety standards at the plant not being upheld at a level required by federal regulations. It would raise questions as to what extent other workers at the plant were exposed to the same dose as Silkwood, and if the problems were not just within the plant, and everyone living within the area would also be at risk of exposure. Silkwood alleged that the safety standards at the plant were declining due to an increase in production, therefore she was likely not the only worker at risk due to these lowered standards.
Outcome: The specific law that would have been violated in this case would be 10 CFR 20.1201, which outlines occupational dose limits for adults in the United States. The jury in this case rendered a verdict of $505,000 in damages and an extra $10,000,000 in punitive damages. After an appeal, the judgement was reduced to $5000, and reversing the award of punitive.
Nuclear Reactors, Materials, and Waste CIKR Sector: Case Study of the Nuclea...Lindsey Landolfi
The document provides information about the 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear accident in Pennsylvania through images, maps, and text. It discusses the accident's progression, including the partial meltdown in the reactor core and the release of radioactive gases. It also examines the emergency response, media coverage, investigations conducted afterward, debates around nuclear power, and lingering impacts on public perception and policy.
The Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986 was caused by flawed reactor design and human error. During a test, there was an unexpected power surge and explosions, releasing radiation into the atmosphere. Over 30 emergency responders died immediately from radiation exposure. Over 100,000 people were evacuated and the accident highlighted issues with nuclear safety protocols. It led to increased international cooperation and new conventions to prevent future disasters and improve emergency response.
09 0214 NO To BNPP Bataan Dr. Kelvin Rodolfogtapang
The document discusses several risks and issues associated with nuclear power and reopening the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) in the Philippines. It notes that BNPP is located on an active volcano, Mount Natib, which last erupted 11,000-18,000 years ago. It also discusses the seismic risks, with faulting occurring as recently as 3,000 years ago. The document questions claims that reopening BNPP would only cost $800 million and take 5 years, as the plant would need extensive modernization and safety assessments given its age.
David Ortmann has over 30 years of experience as a general superintendent on numerous overseas construction projects for U.S. embassies and government facilities. He has managed projects in New Zealand, Guyana, Taiwan, Australia, Mongolia, Latvia, Greece, Armenia, Croatia, Ukraine, El Salvador, Dominican Republic, and Egypt. Ortmann received degrees in construction management, business administration, and construction technology, and holds an OSHA safety certificate.
The Chernobyl nuclear disaster occurred on April 26, 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine. During a safety test on reactor 4, a surge of power caused an explosion that blew the reactor apart and released massive amounts of radiation. Hundreds of thousands of people had to be evacuated and the area remains contaminated. The disaster highlighted issues with the Soviet response and lessons about safety culture, emergency preparedness, and open communication.
Nuclear Reactors, Materials, and Waste CIKR Sector: Case Study of the Nuclea...Lindsey Landolfi
The Three Mile Island nuclear accident in 1979 was caused by a series of mechanical failures and human errors that led to a partial meltdown of the reactor core. It highlighted issues with emergency response such as delays in notifying authorities, inconsistent information provided to the public, and a mistaken evacuation order. The accident caused low levels of radiation release but no direct deaths or injuries. It revealed vulnerabilities in nuclear plant safety systems and operator training as well as poor coordination between authorities during the emergency response.
On April 26, 1986, a nuclear meltdown occurred at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine, releasing radioactive material into the atmosphere. The explosion and fire killed up to 50 people initially and may have caused up to 4,000 additional cancer deaths. Radioactive fallout spread as far as Canada. The abandoned city of Prypiat near the plant was contaminated. Over time, hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on cleanup efforts, safety improvements to other Soviet reactors, and aid programs for affected regions in Ukraine, Russia and Belarus.
The Chernobyl disaster occurred on April 26, 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine when a test caused reactor number four to explode. This caused a fire and released radioactive material into the atmosphere. It is estimated that up to 50 people died immediately from the explosion and fire and thousands more may die from cancer in the long run. Radioactive fallout from Chernobyl could be detected as far away as Canada and contaminated areas of Belarus, Russia, Ukraine and parts of Europe. The abandoned city of Prypiat near the plant remains uninhabited due to the contamination. Lessons learned included the need for improved reactor safety standards, especially in Eastern Europe.
The Chernobyl disaster was the worst nuclear disaster in history that occurred in 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Pripyat, Ukraine. Due to a failed safety test and procedural errors, there was an unexpected surge of energy during a reactor systems test that caused an explosion and fire that released large amounts of radioactive material into the atmosphere. The disaster contaminated over 7 million people and large areas of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. It took many years and cost billions of dollars to contain the damage and effects of the radiation releases from the disaster.
This presentation is part of Renewable Energy Technologies course 2020
Faculty of Engineering - Benha University
By
Prof. Ghada Amer
Category
Science & Technology
Category
Science & Technology
Category
Science & Technology
The Chernobyl disaster of 1986 was the worst nuclear power plant accident in history. It was caused by design flaws in the reactor, operational errors during a safety test, lack of proper training, and Soviet secrecy. The explosion and fire released radioactive materials, causing immediate deaths and long-term health issues and environmental contamination. It highlighted the need for improved safety regulations, emergency response plans, and transparency regarding nuclear energy. Ongoing efforts aim to understand and address the disaster's consequences.
The Chernobyl disaster was the worst nuclear power plant accident in history. On April 26, 1986, a safety test caused an uncontrollable nuclear chain reaction in reactor number 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant near Pripyat, Ukraine. Large amounts of radioactive materials were released into the atmosphere and spread over much of the western USSR and Europe. Over 100,000 people were evacuated from the surrounding area. The accident exposed the flaws in the RBMK nuclear reactor design and in the Soviet safety culture. It highlighted the need for robust safety systems, oversight, and transparency to prevent future disasters.
The document summarizes an NTSB report on a 2012 freight train derailment in Paulsboro, New Jersey caused by a movable bridge not being properly locked. Seven cars derailed when the bridge rotated under the moving train, misaligning the rails. Four tank cars entered a creek, with one breaching and releasing 20,000 gallons of vinyl chloride. The report determined the accident was caused by the train crew allowing the train to cross the bridge when the locking mechanism was not fully engaged. Contributing factors included the conductor's lack of training and familiarity with inspecting the bridge locking system. The company did not have an adequate safety program or training to prevent such risks associated with operating the aging bridge, which had
This document summarizes concerns about co-locating high-pressure natural gas pipelines near the Indian Point nuclear power plant. It notes that gas line ruptures pose an extreme risk to the plant but that valid independent risk assessments have not been conducted. Calculations by engineers estimate the blast radius from a rupture would be over 4,000 feet, while the NRC and Entergy calculated a much lower 1,100 feet. It alleges wrongdoing by regulatory agencies in their handling of risk assessments and by the plant operator in providing inaccurate information. Potential consequences of an accident are presented as catastrophic, but regulatory agencies continue to refuse requiring a proper risk evaluation.
The document discusses the establishment of Yucca Mountain in Nevada as the site for permanent storage of nuclear waste in the United States. It describes how the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 designated the Department of Energy to study suitable dump sites. Yucca Mountain was selected in 2002 after extensive geological studies. However, some object to the site due to concerns about earthquakes, volcanic activity and potential groundwater contamination over the next 10,000 years. Seismologists continue monitoring the area to ensure seismic activity levels remain stable.
The Chernobyl disaster was the worst nuclear power plant accident in history. In 1986, a flawed reactor design and human error caused an explosion and fire that released radiation into the atmosphere. Over 30 people died immediately from radiation exposure. The radioactive fallout spread over much of Europe. Long term impacts included increased cancer rates and contamination of surrounding land and water. The disaster demonstrated the importance of safety in nuclear power and providing emergency response plans for such accidents.
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019Partito democratico
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
Indira awas yojana housing scheme renamed as PMAYnarinav14
Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) played a significant role in addressing rural housing needs in India. It emerged as a comprehensive program for affordable housing solutions in rural areas, predating the government’s broader focus on mass housing initiatives.
The Antyodaya Saral Haryana Portal is a pioneering initiative by the Government of Haryana aimed at providing citizens with seamless access to a wide range of government services
Bharat Mata - History of Indian culture.pdfBharat Mata
Bharat Mata Channel is an initiative towards keeping the culture of this country alive. Our effort is to spread the knowledge of Indian history, culture, religion and Vedas to the masses.
AHMR is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed online journal created to encourage and facilitate the study of all aspects (socio-economic, political, legislative and developmental) of Human Mobility in Africa. Through the publication of original research, policy discussions and evidence research papers AHMR provides a comprehensive forum devoted exclusively to the analysis of contemporaneous trends, migration patterns and some of the most important migration-related issues.
1. Scott Portzline
Three Mile Island Alert
Security Consultant
Harrisburg PA
April 2, 2015
Bakken Oil Trains – Potential External Threat to the
Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station
Presented to Harrisburg PA
City Council
2. • Shortly after 9-11, the City of Harrisburg requested
TMIA to perform a “security needs” analysis of Three
Mile Island for a Homeland Security program.
• I participated in U.S. Coast Guard rulemaking for
protection from water craft attacks at nuclear plants.
• We warned about the terrorism threat at TMI prior
to the revelation of the nearby training camp of men
associated with Ramsey Yousef.
3. • Created a rulemaking docket so that the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission would
require guards at entrances.
• Maintained a database on lost and stolen
nuclear materials in the U.S.
• Had a document removed from the U.S.
Department of Energy website which
revealed the best angle to attack a nuclear
plant with an aircraft.
4. • Caused the NRC to remove sensitive
documents which reveal the exact location of
dangerous radioisotopes used at industrial,
educational and medical facilities. These
documents also revealed security measures or
lack thereof.
5. July, 2013, a Bakken oil train derailed at Lac-Mégantic,
Quebec Canada and exploded, killing 47 and burning
down a quarter of the town.
6. Six months later, another crude-bearing train derailed
and exploded in Casselton, North Dakota, prompting
the evacuation of most of the town's 2,300 residents.
7. Feb. 16, 2015 -- Mount Carbon, WV
• An hour after this video was taken, this
train crashed causing an explosion and
burned into the night.
• Two nearby towns were evacuated
• Governor declared a state of emergency
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcguIfLO3Ls
16. “The licensee is currently
sheltering its employees on
site and is turning away people
from the site who are
reporting to work.”
“Five licensee people who
reported to work passed
through the ammonia cloud on
their way to work. The
individuals complained of
nausea and have been
transported to a hospital via
an ambulance.”
Toxic cloud
impact event
18. Loss of Offsite Power is the single greatest
concern for contributing to reactor core
damage.
FUKUSHIMA is a station blackout catastrophe.
19. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is re-
examining external hazard threats like floods,
fires, earthquakes etc..
I do not have faith in NRC’s analysis.
Examples:
• Truck Bomb set back distances were too small
• Control of the Emergency Responders Routes
• My entrance guard rulemaking vanished
20. “Approaches: Particular emphasis must be placed on main and
alternate entry routes for law-enforcement or other offsite
support agencies and the location of control points
for marshalling and coordinating response activities.”
NRC dropped this portion of a proposed rule
TMI’s North Bridge
The main entrance for Emergency Responders
21. Control of TMI’s two Bridges
• Without control of the bridges at TMI,
many aspects of the planned emergency
responses are severely compromised.
• Currently, the bridges are
not controlled by security
forces.
• The NRC made my docketed
proposed rule for entrance
guards disappear.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission broke more than forty of its
own rules and guidelines in the handling of my docketed petition
for rulemaking for entrance guards.
http://tinyurl.com/qj2mn3d
23. Communications is a problem with every
Homeland Security Drill – first responders will
be effected as well as citizens.
24. Security vs. Safety creates debatable conditions of
vulnerability and risks.
The need for secrecy will trump the need for prior
knowledge of dangerous shipments.
BEST Recommendation: Harrisburg should get assurances
from the Dept. of Transportation that communication of a
dangerous transportation accident will occur within 10
minutes.
25. Dangerous shipments should not occur on days of
extreme weather.
I saw a high level nuclear waste train traveling (8 miles
north of Hbg.) at 45 miles per hour on a 96 degree day.
It was the third day in a row of 95+ degree temperatures
and a train had derailed in Washington D.C. due to
tracks warping from the extreme heat.
The speed of trains should be slowed where extra safety
is appropriate.
26. Geiger counters should be activated
as first responders approach any
emergency situation.
end
Editor's Notes
Toxic cloud
1 hour before crash and burn Gov. declared a state of emergency
as much as 30,000 gallons of crude oil in each car
Tracks are yellow – reactor, fuel pools and control room
The NRC withdrew this portion of a proposed rule when I stated that TMI would have to be required to protect the bridges.