The document discusses bad faith assessments related to generic and descriptive domain names. It notes that speculation in "premium domain names" containing generic words can be a legitimate use. It also discusses how the concept of bad faith is difficult and evolving, with conflicting decisions between UDRP and ADR rules. The document examines factors like large domain name portfolios, passive ownership, and domain name trading as possible legitimate interests. It warns of increased potential for reverse domain name hijacking complaints. Overall it argues that domain name law needs to better address the unique nature of domain names and interact more with the domain name community.