This document discusses modifying the Atlanta classification system for acute pancreatitis. It summarizes the history of classifications, limitations of the Atlanta system, and proposals for revisions. The Atlanta system only divides pancreatitis into mild and severe groups. The revised classification adds a third category - moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) - for patients with local complications but transient organ failure who require ICU care. The document presents results of a study validating the MSAP subgroup and comparing outcomes between mild, MSAP and severe pancreatitis. The study found MSAP to have higher morbidity than mild but lower mortality than severe pancreatitis.
Management of Acute Pancreatitis By Dr. Dhaval Mangukiya
https://drdhavalmangukiya.com/
http://www.youtube.com/c/DrDhavalMangukiyaGastrosurgeonSurat
https://gastrosurgerysurat.blogspot.com/
Fast-track surgery - the role of the anaesthesiologist in ERASscanFOAM
A presentation by Narinder Rawal at the 2017 meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Anaestesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.
All available content from SSAI2017: https://scanfoam.org/ssai2017/
Delivered in collaboration between scanFOAM, SSAI & SFAI.
NUTRIREA-2 (Holden Young - Roseman University College of Pharmacy)HoldenYoung3
Presentation
NUTRIREA-2 (Holden Young - Roseman University College of Pharmacy)
Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised,
controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2).
Lancet. 2018;391:133–43
In this multinational, randomized, controlled trial in patients with chronic kidney disease who were undergoing angiography, researchers found no benefit of intravenous sodium bicarbonate over intravenous sodium chloride or of oral acetylcysteine over oral placebo for the prevention of death, need for dialysis, or persistent kidney impairment at 90 days or for the prevention of contrast-associated acute kidney injury or other secondary end points.
Management of Acute Pancreatitis By Dr. Dhaval Mangukiya
https://drdhavalmangukiya.com/
http://www.youtube.com/c/DrDhavalMangukiyaGastrosurgeonSurat
https://gastrosurgerysurat.blogspot.com/
Fast-track surgery - the role of the anaesthesiologist in ERASscanFOAM
A presentation by Narinder Rawal at the 2017 meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Anaestesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.
All available content from SSAI2017: https://scanfoam.org/ssai2017/
Delivered in collaboration between scanFOAM, SSAI & SFAI.
NUTRIREA-2 (Holden Young - Roseman University College of Pharmacy)HoldenYoung3
Presentation
NUTRIREA-2 (Holden Young - Roseman University College of Pharmacy)
Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised,
controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2).
Lancet. 2018;391:133–43
In this multinational, randomized, controlled trial in patients with chronic kidney disease who were undergoing angiography, researchers found no benefit of intravenous sodium bicarbonate over intravenous sodium chloride or of oral acetylcysteine over oral placebo for the prevention of death, need for dialysis, or persistent kidney impairment at 90 days or for the prevention of contrast-associated acute kidney injury or other secondary end points.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
Atlanta Classification.ppt
1. Do we need to modify Atlanta
Classification?
Mahesh Khakurel FRCS,FCPS, FNAMS,
FAICS, Professor of Surgery and Clinical
Director, Kist Medical College,
Kathmandu, Nepal
Paleswan Lakhey, MS, McH, Associate
Professor of Surgery, TU University
Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
2. Lord Moynihan, 1925
*“…………………….acute pancreatitis is the
most terrible of all the calamities occurring
in conjunction with the abdominal viscera.”
*Arch.surgery 1925 81, 132;42
3. Background
• Acute inflammatory disease of pancreas with
wide clinical variation and outcome varies
according to the severity
• Categorization of severity – one of the key
elements of the classification
• First attempt to classify severity of
pancreatitis – Reginald Fitz in 1889
considering morphological component in the
classification
4. Atlanta Classification
• A clinically based classification system for acute
pancreatitis. Summary of the International
Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis. Atlanta, Ga,
September 11 through 13, 1992 (46 international
authority from 6 discipline)
• Attempted to create an ideal classification
system for acute pancreatitis that would be
simple, objective, quantitative, noninvasive and
accurate
Bradley EL, Arch Surgery, 1993, May, 128(5):586-90
5. Atlanta Classification (AF)
• Remained gold standard for nearly 16
years
• Confusion aroused because of different
guideline within AC with new guideline
such as UK guideline, American guide line
and similar guide line from other countries
• Terminologies are defined differently by
different group
6. Limitation of AC
• It divides acute pancreatitis into two group only
with mild (no organ failure) severe (with local
complications and persistent organ failure and
high mortality) requiring intervention and ICU
care.
• Does not cover transient organ failure who
requires ICU care and some form of intervention
• Many of the definition proved confusing
7. Limitations of Atlanta classification
• Broad definition of severe acute pancreatitis
• Lack of differentiation between transient and persistent
organ failure
• Criteria for organ failure defined in Atlanta not used
uniformly
• Definition of local complications not uniform
• GI bleeding is not common occurrence
• Banks PA et al, Am J Gastroenterol
2006;101:2379-2400
Vege SS et al, Gastroenterology 2005;128:113
– Pandol SJ et al, Gastroenterology 2007;132:1127-51
8. Acute pancreatitis classification
working group
• Revision of Atlanta classification and definitions
of collections associated with AP has been
proposed by Acute Pancreatitis Classification
Working Group in 2007
• 3rd revision based on worldwide
review/suggestions published in 2009
» WWW.pancreas club/com resourses/Atlana classification.pdf
9. The goal of the group
The goal of new classification is to update
AC, clarify previous areas of confusion,
improve clinical assessment and
management, and standardized means of
data collection for future studies to allow
objective evaluation of new therapies
10.
11. Clinical features of mild, moderately
severe, and severe pancreatitis
Feature Mild (MAP) Moderate
(MSAP)
Severe
(SAP)
Structural
alterations
Interstitial Interstitial,
necrotizing, or
local
complications,
Interstitial,
necrotizing, or
local
complications
Functional
effects
No organ failure No organ
failure, or tran.
Persistent organ
failure
Morbidity Low High High
Mortality No Low High
12. Rationale of the study
• Tertiary care hospital
• No such study has been conducted in the past
as the concept is being investigated recently
• This study has been carried out to see whether
the classification system is feasible in our set up.
13. Aims and Objectives
• To describe the demographics, etiology and
severity predictors in acute pancreatitis
• To determine the proportion of MSAP and to
validate this subgroup in patients with acute
pancreatitis
14. Study design
• Prospective observational study
• Carried out in patients admitted with the diagnosis of acute
pancreatitis from Sept 2008 to March 2010
• Surgical Gastroenterology units of Department of Surgery, Tribhuvan
University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
• Informed consent
• Ethical clearance
15. Inclusion/Exclusion criteria
• Inclusion criteria
All patients ≥ 18 years with two of the following
diagnostic criteria
• Abdominal pain suggestive of pancreatic origin
• Serum amylase and/ or lipase ≥3 times normal
• Radiological findings compatible with acute pancreatitis
UK guidelines for management of acute pancreatitis 2005
• Exclusion criteria
Alternative diagnosis
Those patients that left against medical advise
16. Data collection
• Data regarding
– Need for ICU care, length of ICU stay, length of
hospital stay, need for surgical intervention, death
(Primary outcome variables)
– Patient demographics, diagnostic criteria, predicted
severity according to Ranson’s criteria, etiology, local
and systemic complications (Secondary outcome
variables)
17. Study procedure
• Patients with OF (transient/persistent) admitted in
ICU, rest in the ward
• Aggressive medical management
• Need for intervention defined as need for
endotracheal intubation, ionotropic support,
hemodialysis and minimally invasive and surgical
intervention for the local complications
• Development of local complications or organ failure
18. Study procedure
• Patients divided into 3 groups depending upon
the presence of organ failure and local
complications
– Mild acute pancreatitis (MAP)
– Moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP)
– Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP)
• Comparison was made between the three
groups
19. Statistical analysis
• SPSS version 11.5
• Continuous variables expressed as mean ±
standard deviation and categorical variables as
frequency and percentage
• Independent t-test and Chi square tests
• Confidence interval 95%
• p value < 0.05 taken as statistically significant
20. Demography
Variables Frequency (n=172) Percentag
e
Age, year, mean ± SD 42.7 ± 16.5
Male 95 55.2
Female 77 44.8
Etiology
Gall stones
Alcohol
Hypertriglyceridemia
Drugs
Idiopathic
104
64
1
3
38
60.5
37.2
0.6
1.7
22.1
Predicted severity 72 41.9
Local complications 68 39.5
Organ failure 12 7
Mortality 4 2.3
24. Clinical characteristics of patients who
died
Age/Se
x
Etiology Local
complicatio
ns
No of
organ
failure
Death
48/M Idiopathic - 2(ARDS/Shoc
k)
Day 3
41/F Idiopathic Fluid collection 2(ARDS/Shoc
k)
Day 4
65/F Biliary Fluid collection 1(ARDS) Day 7
72/F Biliary Fluid +
Necrosis <30%
1(ARDS) Day 7
27. Comparison of morbidity and mortality
among new group
Variable MAP
(n=103)
MSAP
(n=57)
SAP
(n=12)
P value
Need for ICU stay, n
(%)
0 11 (19.3) 12 (100) <0.001
Need for intervention, n
(%)
0 0 10 (83.3) <0.001
Length of ICU stay,
mean±SD, days
0 1 9.8±4.6 <0.001
Length of hospital stay,
mean±SD, days
4.9±2.1 8.7±3.7 16.8±8.1 <0.001
Death, n (%) 0 0 4 (33.3) <0.001
28. Comparison between MAP and MSAP
Variable MAP
(n=103)
MSAP
(n=57)
P value
Need for ICU stay, n (%) 0 11 (19.2) 0.001
Need for intervention, n (%) 0 0 NS
Length of ICU stay,
mean±SD, days
0 1 0.001
Length of hospital stay,
mean±SD, days
4.87±2.1 8.6±3.7 <0.001
Death, n (%) 0 0 NS
29. Comparison between MSAP and SAP
Variable MSAP
(n=57)
SAP
(n=12)
P value
Need for ICU stay, n (%) 11 (19.2) 12 (100) <0.001
Need for intervention, n
(%)
0 10 (83.3) <0.001
Length of ICU stay,
mean±SD, days
1 9.8±4.6 <0.001
Length of hospital stay,
mean±SD, days
8.6±3.7 16.6±8.1 <0.001
Death, n (%) 0 4 (33) <0.001
30. Discussion
• Call for revision of Atlanta classification in
various publications
• Major impetus for revision
– Recent significant advances in understanding
the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis
– Role of organ failure
• Bollen TL et al: BJS 2008;95:6-21
• Petrov MS et al: Am J Gastroenterology 2010;105:74-76
32. • Talukdar R et al. Moderately severe acute
pancreatitis: a prospective validation study of
this new subgroup of acute pancreatitis.
Pancreatology 2009;9:434.
• De-Madaria E et al. Update of the Atlanta
classification of severity of acute pancreatitis:
should a moderate category be included?
Pancreatology 2009;9:433–434.
33. Discussion
• Group from Mayo Clinic proposed new group MSAP
• High morbidity as SAP and low mortality as MAP
• Prospective validation done by the same group
• Total of 82 patients: MSAP – 12 (14.6%)
• This study, total 172 patients: MSAP – 57 (33.1%)
Talukdar R et al. Pancreatology 2009;9:434.
34.
35. Comparison of results of this study
with other studies
Variable
(MSAP vs SAP)
Talukdar R et
al
(n=82)
De-Madaria E
(n=135)
This study
(n=172)
Need for ICU care 0% vs 71.4% 2.4% vs
62.3%
19.2% vs 100%
Need for
intervention
50% vs 35.7% 2.4% vs
45.5%
0% vs 83.3%
Length of hospital
stay, mean ± SD in
days
5.9 vs 17.5 21.2±11.5 vs
25±9.9
8.6±3.7 vs
16.6±8.1
Mortality 0% vs 28.6% 0% vs 45.5% 0% vs 33%
36. Discussion
• This study showed that MAP, MSAP, SAP as
classified according to the structural alterations
and functional effects, exist as different groups
in terms of need for ICU, need for intervention,
length of ICU stay, hospital stay and death.
• However, this study did not show that MSAP had
prolonged hospitalization as SAP as shown by
other studies.
37. Conclusion
• This study showed that MSAP having local
complications without OF exist as exclusive
entity different from MAP and SAP.
• We need to work closely with other groups to
validate in large number of patients and
recommend for inclusion of MSAP