The document appears to be a presentation about assessing growth opportunities and timelines. It discusses Contoso's goals of empowering collaborative thinking and fostering a consumer-first mindset. The presentation lists the president, CEO, COO, and VP of Marketing and includes sections on why assessment is important, example summative assessments, Bloom's Taxonomy, and a quote about business opportunities.
Global Issues in the Liberal Arts Research Paper Proposal.docxwhittemorelucilla
Global Issues in the Liberal Arts
Research Paper Proposal
Name: _____Shannon Gutierrez_____ Date: __1/11/18_______________
1. What is the general topic you want to learn and write about? The general topic must be
an objective examination of a topic related to one of the four breadth areas and it must
have a global perspective or be of global significance.
Economics of global warming is the general topic for my research paper.
2. Identify which breadth area(s) the topic is related to and explain how the topic is related
to this breadth area (s), or how you can use the perspectives of this particular breadth area
(s) to examine the topic of your research within its global context.
This topic will fall within the science/description and social civic breadth area of liberal
arts. First, Social/Civic because the climate affects the entire world and the >>>> policy
on global warming requires that countries develop relationships to accomplish an overall
objective. Many Activist believe that science has proven global warming to be a real
ecological concern yet many countries and individuals in society choose not to
acknowledge global warming as fact.
The Science/Description breadth area because as mentioned one must believe in the facts
and evidence provided on the topic. Global warming and the study of its effects requires
an understanding of nature and the structure. Technological advances may provide many
solutions to the challenge, however, few countries have the financial means or education
to implement such solutions.
3. What is the purpose of the study? Why have you chosen this particular general topic?
Do you intend to educate or illuminate a particular group about your topic? Do you
intend that this group or person will change it's/his/her thinking or take action because of
your study?
The purpose of this study is to have a deeper understanding of global politics and how the
United States decision to leave the Paris Agreement will financially impact third world
countries.
4. What is your research question? You are not conducting field research (i.e., survey data,
interviews, primary source data). Research in this context means investigating a topic in
depth using credible sources.
Your research question guides what sources you select and read in depth. This is a
specific, clear, concise question you have about the topic that is grounded in facts that
can be discovered in the literature. Remember that the question should be intellectually
challenging and not be one that can be answered with a simple “yes,” “no,” or “maybe.”
Review your question for its clarity and scope. Will the question point you to specific
information on your topic? Will you be able to find enough information on the topic? Is it
so broad that you will get hundreds or thousands of articles on the topic? Could you write
approximately 8-10 pages that illuminate what scholars are writing about ...
Common misconceptions of critical thinkingSHARON BAILIN, RLynellBull52
Common misconceptions of critical thinking
SHARON BAILIN, ROLAND CASE,
JERROLD R. COOMBS and LEROI B. DANIELS
In this paper, the ® rst of two, we analyse three widely-held conceptions of critical
thinking: as one or more skills, as mental processes, and as sets of procedures. Each
view is, we contend, wrong-headed, misleading or, at best, unhelpful. Some who write
about critical thinking seem to muddle all three views in an unenlightening me lange.
Apart from the errors or inadequacies of the conceptions themselves, they promote or
abet misconceived practices for teaching critical thinking. Together, they have led to
the view that critical thinking is best taught by practising it. We o� er alternative
proposals for the teaching of critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a subject of considerable current interest, both in terms
of theory and pedagogy. A great deal is written about critical thinking,
conferences on the subject abound, and educational initiatives aimed at
fostering critical thinking proliferate.1 It is our view that much of the
theoretical work and many of the pedagogical endeavours in this area are
misdirected because they are based on faulty conceptions of critical think-
ing. Critical thinking is frequently conceptualized in terms of skills, pro-
cesses, procedures and practice. Much of the educational literature either
refers to cognitive or thinking skills or equates critical thinking with certain
mental processes or procedural moves that can be improved through
practice. In this paper we attempt to explain the misconceptions inherent
in such ways of conceptualizing critical thinking. It is important to note
that much of the literature contains a pervasive miasma of overlapping uses
of such terms as skill, process, procedure, behaviour, mental operations,
j. curriculum studies, 1999, vol. 31, no. 3, 269± 283
S haron Bailin, a professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby,
British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6, is interested in philosophical inquiries into critical
thinking, creativity and aesthetic education. Her publications include Reason and V alues:
New Essays in Philosophy of Education (Calgary, AB: Detselig, 1993), co-edited with John P.
Portelli.
Roland Case, an associate professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University,
conducts research in social studies and legal and global education. His most recent book is
The Canadian Anthology of Social S tudies: Issues and S trategies (Burnaby, BC: Faculty of
Education, Simon Fraser University), co-edited with Penney Clark.
Jerrold R. Coombs, a professor in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia,
has published extensively on ethical issues in education and the development of competence
in practical reasoning. His publications include Applied Ethics: A Reader (Oxford: Black-
well, 1993), co-edited with Earl R. Winkler.
L eRoi B. Daniels, a professor emeritus in the Faculty of Education, University of British
Columbia, ...
Global Issues in the Liberal Arts Research Paper Proposal.docxwhittemorelucilla
Global Issues in the Liberal Arts
Research Paper Proposal
Name: _____Shannon Gutierrez_____ Date: __1/11/18_______________
1. What is the general topic you want to learn and write about? The general topic must be
an objective examination of a topic related to one of the four breadth areas and it must
have a global perspective or be of global significance.
Economics of global warming is the general topic for my research paper.
2. Identify which breadth area(s) the topic is related to and explain how the topic is related
to this breadth area (s), or how you can use the perspectives of this particular breadth area
(s) to examine the topic of your research within its global context.
This topic will fall within the science/description and social civic breadth area of liberal
arts. First, Social/Civic because the climate affects the entire world and the >>>> policy
on global warming requires that countries develop relationships to accomplish an overall
objective. Many Activist believe that science has proven global warming to be a real
ecological concern yet many countries and individuals in society choose not to
acknowledge global warming as fact.
The Science/Description breadth area because as mentioned one must believe in the facts
and evidence provided on the topic. Global warming and the study of its effects requires
an understanding of nature and the structure. Technological advances may provide many
solutions to the challenge, however, few countries have the financial means or education
to implement such solutions.
3. What is the purpose of the study? Why have you chosen this particular general topic?
Do you intend to educate or illuminate a particular group about your topic? Do you
intend that this group or person will change it's/his/her thinking or take action because of
your study?
The purpose of this study is to have a deeper understanding of global politics and how the
United States decision to leave the Paris Agreement will financially impact third world
countries.
4. What is your research question? You are not conducting field research (i.e., survey data,
interviews, primary source data). Research in this context means investigating a topic in
depth using credible sources.
Your research question guides what sources you select and read in depth. This is a
specific, clear, concise question you have about the topic that is grounded in facts that
can be discovered in the literature. Remember that the question should be intellectually
challenging and not be one that can be answered with a simple “yes,” “no,” or “maybe.”
Review your question for its clarity and scope. Will the question point you to specific
information on your topic? Will you be able to find enough information on the topic? Is it
so broad that you will get hundreds or thousands of articles on the topic? Could you write
approximately 8-10 pages that illuminate what scholars are writing about ...
Common misconceptions of critical thinkingSHARON BAILIN, RLynellBull52
Common misconceptions of critical thinking
SHARON BAILIN, ROLAND CASE,
JERROLD R. COOMBS and LEROI B. DANIELS
In this paper, the ® rst of two, we analyse three widely-held conceptions of critical
thinking: as one or more skills, as mental processes, and as sets of procedures. Each
view is, we contend, wrong-headed, misleading or, at best, unhelpful. Some who write
about critical thinking seem to muddle all three views in an unenlightening me lange.
Apart from the errors or inadequacies of the conceptions themselves, they promote or
abet misconceived practices for teaching critical thinking. Together, they have led to
the view that critical thinking is best taught by practising it. We o� er alternative
proposals for the teaching of critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a subject of considerable current interest, both in terms
of theory and pedagogy. A great deal is written about critical thinking,
conferences on the subject abound, and educational initiatives aimed at
fostering critical thinking proliferate.1 It is our view that much of the
theoretical work and many of the pedagogical endeavours in this area are
misdirected because they are based on faulty conceptions of critical think-
ing. Critical thinking is frequently conceptualized in terms of skills, pro-
cesses, procedures and practice. Much of the educational literature either
refers to cognitive or thinking skills or equates critical thinking with certain
mental processes or procedural moves that can be improved through
practice. In this paper we attempt to explain the misconceptions inherent
in such ways of conceptualizing critical thinking. It is important to note
that much of the literature contains a pervasive miasma of overlapping uses
of such terms as skill, process, procedure, behaviour, mental operations,
j. curriculum studies, 1999, vol. 31, no. 3, 269± 283
S haron Bailin, a professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby,
British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6, is interested in philosophical inquiries into critical
thinking, creativity and aesthetic education. Her publications include Reason and V alues:
New Essays in Philosophy of Education (Calgary, AB: Detselig, 1993), co-edited with John P.
Portelli.
Roland Case, an associate professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University,
conducts research in social studies and legal and global education. His most recent book is
The Canadian Anthology of Social S tudies: Issues and S trategies (Burnaby, BC: Faculty of
Education, Simon Fraser University), co-edited with Penney Clark.
Jerrold R. Coombs, a professor in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia,
has published extensively on ethical issues in education and the development of competence
in practical reasoning. His publications include Applied Ethics: A Reader (Oxford: Black-
well, 1993), co-edited with Earl R. Winkler.
L eRoi B. Daniels, a professor emeritus in the Faculty of Education, University of British
Columbia, ...
Common misconceptions of critical thinkingSHARON BAILIN, R.docxclarebernice
Common misconceptions of critical thinking
SHARON BAILIN, ROLAND CASE,
JERROLD R. COOMBS and LEROI B. DANIELS
In this paper, the ®rst of two, we analyse three widely-held conceptions of critical
thinking: as one or more skills, as mental processes, and as sets of procedures. Each
view is, we contend, wrong-headed, misleading or, at best, unhelpful. Some who write
about critical thinking seem to muddle all three views in an unenlightening meÂlange.
Apart from the errors or inadequacies of the conceptions themselves, they promote or
abet misconceived practices for teaching critical thinking. Together, they have led to
the view that critical thinking is best taught by practising it. We oÄer alternative
proposals for the teaching of critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a subject of considerable current interest, both in terms
of theory and pedagogy. A great deal is written about critical thinking,
conferences on the subject abound, and educational initiatives aimed at
fostering critical thinking proliferate.1 It is our view that much of the
theoretical work and many of the pedagogical endeavours in this area are
misdirected because they are based on faulty conceptions of critical think-
ing. Critical thinking is frequently conceptualized in terms of skills, pro-
cesses, procedures and practice. Much of the educational literature either
refers to cognitive or thinking skills or equates critical thinking with certain
mental processes or procedural moves that can be improved through
practice. In this paper we attempt to explain the misconceptions inherent
in such ways of conceptualizing critical thinking. It is important to note
that much of the literature contains a pervasive miasma of overlapping uses
of such terms as skill, process, procedure, behaviour, mental operations,
j. curriculum studies
, 1999, vol. 31, no. 3, 269±283
S haron Bailin, a professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby,
British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6, is interested in philosophical inquiries into critical
thinking, creativity and aesthetic education. Her publications include Reason and V alues:
New Essays in Philosophy of Education (Calgary, AB: Detselig, 1993), co-edited with John P.
Portelli.
Roland Case, an associate professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University,
conducts research in social studies and legal and global education. His most recent book is
The Canadian Anthology of Social S tudies: Issues and S trategies (Burnaby, BC: Faculty of
Education, Simon Fraser University), co-edited with Penney Clark.
Jerrold R. Coombs, a professor in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia,
has published extensively on ethical issues in education and the development of competence
in practical reasoning. His publications include Applied Ethics: A Reader (Oxford: Black-
well, 1993), co-edited with Earl R. Winkler.
L eRoi B. Daniels, a professor emeritus in the Faculty of Education, University of British
Columbia, is ...
IntroductionLearning ObjectivesAfter reading this chapter,.docxnormanibarber20063
Introduction
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
Describe how understanding how we learn can be applied in a real-world setting with self and others.
Explain the basic premises of behaviorism as applied to learning theory.
Explain the basic premises of cognitivism as applied to learning theory.
Explain the basic premises of constructivism as applied to learning theory.
Explain the basic premises of humanism as applied to learning theory.
Identify evolving frameworks of learning theory that expand upon our understanding of how we learn.
· My Bookshelf
· TOC/Annotation menu
· Downloads
· Print
· Search
· Profile
· Help
i.1 Understanding How We Learn
Previous section
Next section
i.1 Understanding How We Learn
Have you ever
· tried to help someone with a task, but the more you encouraged him or her, the worse the process became?
· studied all night for an exam but received an F on the test?
· heard a song from 20 years ago on the radio but still knew the lyrics? (Maybe you even wondered how you could possibly still know the old melody but not remember the name of the classmate you met less than 24 hours ago.)
· ignored someone because his or her beliefs differed from your beliefs?
· felt frustrated because your child was struggling in school?
· needed to train a group of employees but had no idea how to begin the process?
· assumed that the people around you should learn something as easily as you do?
· looked back on a decision and recognized that you were not thinking logically when that decision was made?
· had someone dear to you pass away and, afterwards, found it difficult to focus on tasks for any length of time?
If you have ever experienced any of these situations, then the psychology of learning could potentially be one of the most important areas that you will ever study. Understanding how humans learn, based on the psychological principles of learning and educational psychologies, can have profound results on productivity, success, and the search for self-actualization. Such knowledge is applicable in your personal and professional lives. It can empower you to know yourself better. Your knowledge about learning can help you teach and support others better, too. Learning, in essence, is something that you do and that affects you every day (Curran, Harrison, & Mackinnon, 2013).
Bowie15/iStock/Thinkstock
Understanding how you learn enables you to teach and support others.
Before you can successfully apply such information in your daily life, it’s important to familiarize yourself with the theories, models, and conceptual frameworks associated with learning. A theory is a set of principles used to explain, predict, and understand why a phenomenon occurs. Theories are supported by research but may not be valid in all situations; theories are propositions, not facts. For example, cognitive load theory (CLT), which is discussed further in Chapter 3, proposes th.
This document shows how the course outcomes can be written effectively. This will act as a guide for writing good course outcome statements. It talks about the domains of learning, learning pyramid, course outcome structure, and checklist.
Theories Of Human Learning And Cognition Overview Write 5–6 page.docxalisoncarleen
Theories Of Human Learning And Cognition
Overview
Write 5–6 pages in which you examine two or three conceptual approaches to a learning- and memory-related research question.
Psychologists need to understand three conceptual approaches to memory and learning: neurological, behavioral, and cognitive.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
•
Competency 1: Use information technology and tools to identify information in the domain of learning and cognition.
▪
Summarize scholarly research articles.
•
Competency 2: Assess the important theories, paradigms, research findings, and conclusions in human learning and cognition.
▪
Apply different approaches to learning and cognition to a particular research question.
▪
Explain how research findings apply to a particular research question.
▪
Describe the conceptual approach being used in a particular research article.
•
Competency 3: Analyze the research methodology and tools typically associated with the study of lifespan development.
▪
Describe the methods and measures used in different conceptual approaches to learning and cognition research.
•
Competency 5: Apply knowledge of theory and research in learning and cognition to inform personal behavior, professional goals, and values in order to understand social policy.
▪
Apply knowledge of theory and research in learning and cognition to inform personal and professional behavior.
•
Competency 6: Communicate effectively in a variety of formats.
▪
Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate APA format with correct grammar, usage, and
mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.
Context
In this first assessment, you will explore conceptual approaches to learning and memory. John Dewey (1910), in his influential text How We Think , and in response to the question "What is thought?" suggests:
Show More
No words are oftener on our lips than thinking and thought . So profuse and varied, indeed, is our use of these words that it is not easy to define just what we mean by them. ... In the first place, thought is used broadly, not to say loosely. Everything that comes to mind, that "goes through our heads" is called a thought. To think of a thing is just to be conscious of it in any way whatsoever. Second, the term is restricted by excluding whatever is directly presented; we think (or think of) only such things as we do not directly see, hear, smell, or taste. Then, the third, the meaning is further limited to beliefs that rest upon some kind of evidence or testimony. Of this third type, two kinds—or rather, two degrees—must be discriminated. In some cases, a belief is accepted with slight or almost no attempt to state the grounds that support it. In other cases, the ground or basis
for a belief is deliberately sought, and its adequacy to support the belief is examined. This process is called .
Academic Discourse Essay
Perfect World Research Paper
Essay about English Academic Writing
Gac Compare and Contrast Essay
What I Have Learned About Research
Academic Ethics And Academic Integrity Essay
Reflection On Academic Reading
Importance And Purpose Of Research Essay
Essay On Academic Reflection
Perfect World Research Paper
My Academic Goals And Research Interests
My Professional And Academic Experience
Educational Research
Developing Strong Academic Study Skills
A Research Study On An Academic Research Essay
Popular Press Vs Academic Research Essay
Academic Background And Career Interest Essay
Essay about The Importance of Academic Integrity
Writing Identity English Composition I 5098910126 .docxjeffevans62972
Writing Identity
English Composition I
50:989:101:26
ASSIGNMENT SHEET - Unit 6
Take Two
Task
In this essay you are going to construct an academic argument based on the stance you
took in your open-letter. This should be imagined as a peer-to-peer assignment,
meaning that you are writing for an audience of undergraduate students. You will be
creating an evidential and rhetorical-based defense for your position. This assignment
also expects that you acknowledge the legitimacy of opposing views through strategies
of concession and refutation. Imagine that you are answering a question in a complex,
non-obvious manner. How will you attempt to prove that answer?
As you draft your final assignment for this course, consider these questions:
• How will you organize your claims and evidence to best present your argument?
• How will you presume counterarguments to your writing?
• Why is your argument important? What is the call to write this essay?
Upon completion of this assignment, I may ask that you consider submitting this to The Scarlet
Review, Rutgers-Camden’s first online, undergraduate magazine.
http://scarletreview.camden.rutgers.edu/home.html
Guidelines
Your essay will be approximately 2,200 to 3,000 words long. The pages are to be double-spaced
with 12-point font and 1-inch margins. The heading of the essay should include your name, my
name, and the unit title. The file name should read as follows: LastName.FirstName_Unit6.
Because this may be considered for publication online, you can format it as such. You are
welcome to include images, graphics, videos, and hyperlinks to bolster your argument. Feel free
to get creative with the title of your essay.
Deliverables
• First draft (5-6 pages)
o Due during paper conference when you meet with me.
o Due on Sakai: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 8:00AM.
o Word Doc or PDF submitted under the “Unit 6 – Draft” Assignment tab on Sakai.
• Final essay (6-8 pages)
o Due: Monday, December 17, 2018 at 12:00PM.
o Word Doc or PDF submitted under the “Unit 6 – Final” Assignment tab on Sakai.
Learning Goals
By the end of these assignments students will practice:
• Analyzing your issue from a critical distance.
• Proper citation and documentation of source materials.
• Acknowledging the legitimacy of opposing views as a rhetorical strategy.
• Constructing a formal thesis and clear organization.
• Creating an academic argument that can be disputed and that adds to a larger
conversation about the issue you are dealing with.
• Summary, paraphrasing, and quotation.
• Composing an academic essay.
Standards of Evaluation
The best essays will:
• Be turned in on time.
• Include a first draft. This draft will count for 25% of the assignment’s grade.
• Be explicit in titling and file naming.
• State a clear thesis of a non-obvious claim to be proved throughout an essay.
• Exemplify why their issue and claim is an important.
1. According to the readings, philosophy began in ancient Egypt an.docxaulasnilda
1. According to the readings, philosophy began in ancient Egypt and then spread to Greece.
True/False
2. This question is based on the presentation of logical concepts in the first reading.
Consider the following argument: "All chemists are Lutheran. Rita is Lutheran. So, Rita must be a chemist."
Is the argument …
Deductive & Invalid
Inductive & Valid
Deductive & Strong
Inductive & Weak
3. Would Socrates agree or disagree with the following statement:
Each of us invents his or her own truth and if you feel it in your heart and really want it to be true then don't listen to those who criticize your belief.
He would agree
He would disagree
4. According to the first reading, Thales asked some important "gateway" questions. Which of the following is not one of the gateway questions discussed in the reading:
Does the diverse range of things we experience have a single common explanation or cause?
Does God exist?
Is the universe intelligible?
5. Scientism is the belief that science is one of many paths to truth about the world.
True/False
6. Deductive arguments always aim to show
The conclusion is probably true
The conclusion must be true
7. In the type of argument known as _____, we begin with premises about a phenomenon or state of affairs to be explained; then we reason from those premises to an explanation for that state of affairs.
deduction
inference to the best explanation
syllogism
anaological induction
8. In the online lecture, the multiverse hypothesis is put forward by Stenger in support of theism.
True/False
9. According to the reading, the cosmic coincidences were known in ancient times.
True/False
10. According to the reading, the problem with Darwin's claim that his theory of natural selection explains all the order in nature is that no evolutionary process of natural selection is possible unless a background system of amazing complexity already exists; but since it must exist prior to any evolutionary process, it cannot be explained as the result of an evolutionary process.
True/False
11. Suppose we have two highly improbable hypotheses: H1 and H2. Suppose H2 is slightly less improbable than H1, all else equal.
According to the presentation of best explanation arguments in the reading, H2 presents a more reasonable explanation than H1.
True/False
12. According to the reading, the fine tuning argument shows that we can know with certainty that an intelligent designer exists.
True/False
13. According to the readings, science cannot possibly explain the source of the order in the universe.
True/False
14. The design argument is presented in the readings as an analogical argument and it is also presented as an inference to the best explanation.
True/False
15. According to the online readings, Ockham's Razor favors the multiverse theory over theism,
True/False
16. The proposition that Mount Rainier has snow on its peak would be an example of a proposition known to be true a priori.
True/False
17. Which of the foll.
Hello everyone! I am thrilled to present my latest portfolio on LinkedIn, marking the culmination of my architectural journey thus far. Over the span of five years, I've been fortunate to acquire a wealth of knowledge under the guidance of esteemed professors and industry mentors. From rigorous academic pursuits to practical engagements, each experience has contributed to my growth and refinement as an architecture student. This portfolio not only showcases my projects but also underscores my attention to detail and to innovative architecture as a profession.
Common misconceptions of critical thinkingSHARON BAILIN, R.docxclarebernice
Common misconceptions of critical thinking
SHARON BAILIN, ROLAND CASE,
JERROLD R. COOMBS and LEROI B. DANIELS
In this paper, the ®rst of two, we analyse three widely-held conceptions of critical
thinking: as one or more skills, as mental processes, and as sets of procedures. Each
view is, we contend, wrong-headed, misleading or, at best, unhelpful. Some who write
about critical thinking seem to muddle all three views in an unenlightening meÂlange.
Apart from the errors or inadequacies of the conceptions themselves, they promote or
abet misconceived practices for teaching critical thinking. Together, they have led to
the view that critical thinking is best taught by practising it. We oÄer alternative
proposals for the teaching of critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a subject of considerable current interest, both in terms
of theory and pedagogy. A great deal is written about critical thinking,
conferences on the subject abound, and educational initiatives aimed at
fostering critical thinking proliferate.1 It is our view that much of the
theoretical work and many of the pedagogical endeavours in this area are
misdirected because they are based on faulty conceptions of critical think-
ing. Critical thinking is frequently conceptualized in terms of skills, pro-
cesses, procedures and practice. Much of the educational literature either
refers to cognitive or thinking skills or equates critical thinking with certain
mental processes or procedural moves that can be improved through
practice. In this paper we attempt to explain the misconceptions inherent
in such ways of conceptualizing critical thinking. It is important to note
that much of the literature contains a pervasive miasma of overlapping uses
of such terms as skill, process, procedure, behaviour, mental operations,
j. curriculum studies
, 1999, vol. 31, no. 3, 269±283
S haron Bailin, a professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby,
British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6, is interested in philosophical inquiries into critical
thinking, creativity and aesthetic education. Her publications include Reason and V alues:
New Essays in Philosophy of Education (Calgary, AB: Detselig, 1993), co-edited with John P.
Portelli.
Roland Case, an associate professor in the Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University,
conducts research in social studies and legal and global education. His most recent book is
The Canadian Anthology of Social S tudies: Issues and S trategies (Burnaby, BC: Faculty of
Education, Simon Fraser University), co-edited with Penney Clark.
Jerrold R. Coombs, a professor in the Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia,
has published extensively on ethical issues in education and the development of competence
in practical reasoning. His publications include Applied Ethics: A Reader (Oxford: Black-
well, 1993), co-edited with Earl R. Winkler.
L eRoi B. Daniels, a professor emeritus in the Faculty of Education, University of British
Columbia, is ...
IntroductionLearning ObjectivesAfter reading this chapter,.docxnormanibarber20063
Introduction
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
Describe how understanding how we learn can be applied in a real-world setting with self and others.
Explain the basic premises of behaviorism as applied to learning theory.
Explain the basic premises of cognitivism as applied to learning theory.
Explain the basic premises of constructivism as applied to learning theory.
Explain the basic premises of humanism as applied to learning theory.
Identify evolving frameworks of learning theory that expand upon our understanding of how we learn.
· My Bookshelf
· TOC/Annotation menu
· Downloads
· Print
· Search
· Profile
· Help
i.1 Understanding How We Learn
Previous section
Next section
i.1 Understanding How We Learn
Have you ever
· tried to help someone with a task, but the more you encouraged him or her, the worse the process became?
· studied all night for an exam but received an F on the test?
· heard a song from 20 years ago on the radio but still knew the lyrics? (Maybe you even wondered how you could possibly still know the old melody but not remember the name of the classmate you met less than 24 hours ago.)
· ignored someone because his or her beliefs differed from your beliefs?
· felt frustrated because your child was struggling in school?
· needed to train a group of employees but had no idea how to begin the process?
· assumed that the people around you should learn something as easily as you do?
· looked back on a decision and recognized that you were not thinking logically when that decision was made?
· had someone dear to you pass away and, afterwards, found it difficult to focus on tasks for any length of time?
If you have ever experienced any of these situations, then the psychology of learning could potentially be one of the most important areas that you will ever study. Understanding how humans learn, based on the psychological principles of learning and educational psychologies, can have profound results on productivity, success, and the search for self-actualization. Such knowledge is applicable in your personal and professional lives. It can empower you to know yourself better. Your knowledge about learning can help you teach and support others better, too. Learning, in essence, is something that you do and that affects you every day (Curran, Harrison, & Mackinnon, 2013).
Bowie15/iStock/Thinkstock
Understanding how you learn enables you to teach and support others.
Before you can successfully apply such information in your daily life, it’s important to familiarize yourself with the theories, models, and conceptual frameworks associated with learning. A theory is a set of principles used to explain, predict, and understand why a phenomenon occurs. Theories are supported by research but may not be valid in all situations; theories are propositions, not facts. For example, cognitive load theory (CLT), which is discussed further in Chapter 3, proposes th.
This document shows how the course outcomes can be written effectively. This will act as a guide for writing good course outcome statements. It talks about the domains of learning, learning pyramid, course outcome structure, and checklist.
Theories Of Human Learning And Cognition Overview Write 5–6 page.docxalisoncarleen
Theories Of Human Learning And Cognition
Overview
Write 5–6 pages in which you examine two or three conceptual approaches to a learning- and memory-related research question.
Psychologists need to understand three conceptual approaches to memory and learning: neurological, behavioral, and cognitive.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
•
Competency 1: Use information technology and tools to identify information in the domain of learning and cognition.
▪
Summarize scholarly research articles.
•
Competency 2: Assess the important theories, paradigms, research findings, and conclusions in human learning and cognition.
▪
Apply different approaches to learning and cognition to a particular research question.
▪
Explain how research findings apply to a particular research question.
▪
Describe the conceptual approach being used in a particular research article.
•
Competency 3: Analyze the research methodology and tools typically associated with the study of lifespan development.
▪
Describe the methods and measures used in different conceptual approaches to learning and cognition research.
•
Competency 5: Apply knowledge of theory and research in learning and cognition to inform personal behavior, professional goals, and values in order to understand social policy.
▪
Apply knowledge of theory and research in learning and cognition to inform personal and professional behavior.
•
Competency 6: Communicate effectively in a variety of formats.
▪
Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate APA format with correct grammar, usage, and
mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.
Context
In this first assessment, you will explore conceptual approaches to learning and memory. John Dewey (1910), in his influential text How We Think , and in response to the question "What is thought?" suggests:
Show More
No words are oftener on our lips than thinking and thought . So profuse and varied, indeed, is our use of these words that it is not easy to define just what we mean by them. ... In the first place, thought is used broadly, not to say loosely. Everything that comes to mind, that "goes through our heads" is called a thought. To think of a thing is just to be conscious of it in any way whatsoever. Second, the term is restricted by excluding whatever is directly presented; we think (or think of) only such things as we do not directly see, hear, smell, or taste. Then, the third, the meaning is further limited to beliefs that rest upon some kind of evidence or testimony. Of this third type, two kinds—or rather, two degrees—must be discriminated. In some cases, a belief is accepted with slight or almost no attempt to state the grounds that support it. In other cases, the ground or basis
for a belief is deliberately sought, and its adequacy to support the belief is examined. This process is called .
Academic Discourse Essay
Perfect World Research Paper
Essay about English Academic Writing
Gac Compare and Contrast Essay
What I Have Learned About Research
Academic Ethics And Academic Integrity Essay
Reflection On Academic Reading
Importance And Purpose Of Research Essay
Essay On Academic Reflection
Perfect World Research Paper
My Academic Goals And Research Interests
My Professional And Academic Experience
Educational Research
Developing Strong Academic Study Skills
A Research Study On An Academic Research Essay
Popular Press Vs Academic Research Essay
Academic Background And Career Interest Essay
Essay about The Importance of Academic Integrity
Writing Identity English Composition I 5098910126 .docxjeffevans62972
Writing Identity
English Composition I
50:989:101:26
ASSIGNMENT SHEET - Unit 6
Take Two
Task
In this essay you are going to construct an academic argument based on the stance you
took in your open-letter. This should be imagined as a peer-to-peer assignment,
meaning that you are writing for an audience of undergraduate students. You will be
creating an evidential and rhetorical-based defense for your position. This assignment
also expects that you acknowledge the legitimacy of opposing views through strategies
of concession and refutation. Imagine that you are answering a question in a complex,
non-obvious manner. How will you attempt to prove that answer?
As you draft your final assignment for this course, consider these questions:
• How will you organize your claims and evidence to best present your argument?
• How will you presume counterarguments to your writing?
• Why is your argument important? What is the call to write this essay?
Upon completion of this assignment, I may ask that you consider submitting this to The Scarlet
Review, Rutgers-Camden’s first online, undergraduate magazine.
http://scarletreview.camden.rutgers.edu/home.html
Guidelines
Your essay will be approximately 2,200 to 3,000 words long. The pages are to be double-spaced
with 12-point font and 1-inch margins. The heading of the essay should include your name, my
name, and the unit title. The file name should read as follows: LastName.FirstName_Unit6.
Because this may be considered for publication online, you can format it as such. You are
welcome to include images, graphics, videos, and hyperlinks to bolster your argument. Feel free
to get creative with the title of your essay.
Deliverables
• First draft (5-6 pages)
o Due during paper conference when you meet with me.
o Due on Sakai: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 8:00AM.
o Word Doc or PDF submitted under the “Unit 6 – Draft” Assignment tab on Sakai.
• Final essay (6-8 pages)
o Due: Monday, December 17, 2018 at 12:00PM.
o Word Doc or PDF submitted under the “Unit 6 – Final” Assignment tab on Sakai.
Learning Goals
By the end of these assignments students will practice:
• Analyzing your issue from a critical distance.
• Proper citation and documentation of source materials.
• Acknowledging the legitimacy of opposing views as a rhetorical strategy.
• Constructing a formal thesis and clear organization.
• Creating an academic argument that can be disputed and that adds to a larger
conversation about the issue you are dealing with.
• Summary, paraphrasing, and quotation.
• Composing an academic essay.
Standards of Evaluation
The best essays will:
• Be turned in on time.
• Include a first draft. This draft will count for 25% of the assignment’s grade.
• Be explicit in titling and file naming.
• State a clear thesis of a non-obvious claim to be proved throughout an essay.
• Exemplify why their issue and claim is an important.
1. According to the readings, philosophy began in ancient Egypt an.docxaulasnilda
1. According to the readings, philosophy began in ancient Egypt and then spread to Greece.
True/False
2. This question is based on the presentation of logical concepts in the first reading.
Consider the following argument: "All chemists are Lutheran. Rita is Lutheran. So, Rita must be a chemist."
Is the argument …
Deductive & Invalid
Inductive & Valid
Deductive & Strong
Inductive & Weak
3. Would Socrates agree or disagree with the following statement:
Each of us invents his or her own truth and if you feel it in your heart and really want it to be true then don't listen to those who criticize your belief.
He would agree
He would disagree
4. According to the first reading, Thales asked some important "gateway" questions. Which of the following is not one of the gateway questions discussed in the reading:
Does the diverse range of things we experience have a single common explanation or cause?
Does God exist?
Is the universe intelligible?
5. Scientism is the belief that science is one of many paths to truth about the world.
True/False
6. Deductive arguments always aim to show
The conclusion is probably true
The conclusion must be true
7. In the type of argument known as _____, we begin with premises about a phenomenon or state of affairs to be explained; then we reason from those premises to an explanation for that state of affairs.
deduction
inference to the best explanation
syllogism
anaological induction
8. In the online lecture, the multiverse hypothesis is put forward by Stenger in support of theism.
True/False
9. According to the reading, the cosmic coincidences were known in ancient times.
True/False
10. According to the reading, the problem with Darwin's claim that his theory of natural selection explains all the order in nature is that no evolutionary process of natural selection is possible unless a background system of amazing complexity already exists; but since it must exist prior to any evolutionary process, it cannot be explained as the result of an evolutionary process.
True/False
11. Suppose we have two highly improbable hypotheses: H1 and H2. Suppose H2 is slightly less improbable than H1, all else equal.
According to the presentation of best explanation arguments in the reading, H2 presents a more reasonable explanation than H1.
True/False
12. According to the reading, the fine tuning argument shows that we can know with certainty that an intelligent designer exists.
True/False
13. According to the readings, science cannot possibly explain the source of the order in the universe.
True/False
14. The design argument is presented in the readings as an analogical argument and it is also presented as an inference to the best explanation.
True/False
15. According to the online readings, Ockham's Razor favors the multiverse theory over theism,
True/False
16. The proposition that Mount Rainier has snow on its peak would be an example of a proposition known to be true a priori.
True/False
17. Which of the foll.
Hello everyone! I am thrilled to present my latest portfolio on LinkedIn, marking the culmination of my architectural journey thus far. Over the span of five years, I've been fortunate to acquire a wealth of knowledge under the guidance of esteemed professors and industry mentors. From rigorous academic pursuits to practical engagements, each experience has contributed to my growth and refinement as an architecture student. This portfolio not only showcases my projects but also underscores my attention to detail and to innovative architecture as a profession.
Dive into the innovative world of smart garages with our insightful presentation, "Exploring the Future of Smart Garages." This comprehensive guide covers the latest advancements in garage technology, including automated systems, smart security features, energy efficiency solutions, and seamless integration with smart home ecosystems. Learn how these technologies are transforming traditional garages into high-tech, efficient spaces that enhance convenience, safety, and sustainability.
Ideal for homeowners, tech enthusiasts, and industry professionals, this presentation provides valuable insights into the trends, benefits, and future developments in smart garage technology. Stay ahead of the curve with our expert analysis and practical tips on implementing smart garage solutions.
Expert Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Drafting ServicesResDraft
Whether you’re looking to create a guest house, a rental unit, or a private retreat, our experienced team will design a space that complements your existing home and maximizes your investment. We provide personalized, comprehensive expert accessory dwelling unit (ADU)drafting solutions tailored to your needs, ensuring a seamless process from concept to completion.
Between Filth and Fortune- Urban Cattle Foraging Realities by Devi S Nair, An...Mansi Shah
This study examines cattle rearing in urban and rural settings, focusing on milk production and consumption. By exploring a case in Ahmedabad, it highlights the challenges and processes in dairy farming across different environments, emphasising the need for sustainable practices and the essential role of milk in daily consumption.
You could be a professional graphic designer and still make mistakes. There is always the possibility of human error. On the other hand if you’re not a designer, the chances of making some common graphic design mistakes are even higher. Because you don’t know what you don’t know. That’s where this blog comes in. To make your job easier and help you create better designs, we have put together a list of common graphic design mistakes that you need to avoid.
Can AI do good? at 'offtheCanvas' India HCI preludeAlan Dix
Invited talk at 'offtheCanvas' IndiaHCI prelude, 29th June 2024.
https://www.alandix.com/academic/talks/offtheCanvas-IndiaHCI2024/
The world is being changed fundamentally by AI and we are constantly faced with newspaper headlines about its harmful effects. However, there is also the potential to both ameliorate theses harms and use the new abilities of AI to transform society for the good. Can you make the difference?
Top 5 Indian Style Modular Kitchen DesignsFinzo Kitchens
Get the perfect modular kitchen in Gurgaon at Finzo! We offer high-quality, custom-designed kitchens at the best prices. Wardrobes and home & office furniture are also available. Free consultation! Best Quality Luxury Modular kitchen in Gurgaon available at best price. All types of Modular Kitchens are available U Shaped Modular kitchens, L Shaped Modular Kitchen, G Shaped Modular Kitchens, Inline Modular Kitchens and Italian Modular Kitchen.
2. AGENDA
P R E S E N TAT I O N T I T L E
Introduction
Primary goals
Areas of growth
Timeline
Summary
2
3. INTRO-
DUCTION
P R E S E N TAT I O N T I T L E
At Contoso, we empower organizations to foster
collaborative thinking to further drive workplace
innovation. By closing the loop and leveraging
agile frameworks, we help businesses grow
organically and foster a consumer-first mindset.
3
7. WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO
ASSSESS
TAKUM A HAYASHI
P r e s i d e n t
M IRJAM NILSSON
C h i e f E x e c u t i v e O f f i c e r
FLORA BERGGREN
C h i e f O p e r a t i o n s O f f i c e r
RAJESH SANTOSHI
V P M a r k e t i n g
7
8. TAKUM A HAYASHI
P r e s i d e n t
M IRJAM NILSSON
C h i e f E x e c u t i v e O f f i c e r
FLORA BERGGREN
C h i e f O p e r a t i o n s O f f i c e r
8
9. TAKUM A HAYASHI
P r e s i d e n t
M IRJAM NILSSON
C h i e f E x e c u t i v e O f f i c e r
FLORA BERGGREN
C h i e f O p e r a t i o n s O f f i c e r
9
10. TAKUM A HAYASHI
P r e s i d e n t
M IRJAM NILSSON
C h i e f E x e c u t i v e O f f i c e r
FLORA BERGGREN
C h i e f O p e r a t i o n s O f f i c e r
1 0
11. TAKUM A HAYASHI
P r e s i d e n t
M IRJAM NILSSON
C h i e f E x e c u t i v e O f f i c e r
FLORA BERGGREN
C h i e f O p e r a t i o n s O f f i c e r
11
12. TAKUM A HAYASHI
P r e s i d e n t
M IRJAM NILSSON
C h i e f E x e c u t i v e O f f i c e r
FLORA BERGGREN
C h i e f O p e r a t i o n s O f f i c e r
1 2
15. The basis of the pyramid is Knowledge, the first level of learning.
Above it
lies Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis and Eva
luation. Each level above builds upon the one below, so you can
What is Bloom’s Taxonomy?
Bloom’s Taxonomy attempts to classify learning stages from
remembering facts to creating new ideas based on the acquired
knowledge.
The idea of Bloom’s Taxonomy is that learning is a consecutive process.
Before applying a concept in real life, we must understand it. Before we
understand a concept, we must remember the key facts related to it.
Therefore, although initially described as a framework, it is now often
depicted as a pyramid.
16. Original Bloom’s Taxonomy
The original taxonomy was first described in
1956 in the book Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives by American educational
psychologist Benjamin Bloom and his coauthors
Max Englehart, Edward Furst, Walter Hill, and
David Krathwohl. Their book classifies learning
goals into one of the categories mentioned
above (from Knowledge to Evaluation)
17.
18. To provide learners with clearer instructional goals, a
group of researchers led by Bloom’s colleague David
Krathwohl and one of Bloom’s students, Lorin Anderson,
revised the taxonomy in 2001.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
22. In the new variant, nouns were replaced by action verbs. Also, the two
highest levels of the taxonomy were swapped. The new learning
stages
are Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate and Create.
The authors also defined cognitive processes associated with these
instructional goals. For example, the ability to remember
requires recognizing and recalling.
Bloom’s Taxonomy levels
Let’s take a closer look at each learning stage, based on the book
describing the revised framework A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching
and Assessing by Krahtwohl and Anderson. The authors recommend
reading the name of each learning category as though preceded by the
phrase “The student is able to…” or “The student learns to…”
23. 1. Remember
This stage of learning is about memorizing basic facts, dates,
events, persons, places, concepts and patterns.
At this level, educators might ask learners simple questions
like:
•What are the most spoken languages of Latin America?
•What is the chemical formula of water?
•Who was the first president of the United States?
The associated cognitive processes, as already noted, are:
•Recognizing means locating knowledge in long-term
memory related to presented material (e.g., recognizing the
dates of important historical events).
•Recalling is retrieving knowledge from long-term memory
24. 1. Remember
The remembering level forms the base of the Bloom's Taxonomy pyramid. Because it is of the lowest complexity, many of the verbs in this
section are in the form of questions. You can use this level of questioning to ensure that students learned specific information from the lesson.
What do you remember about _____?
How would you define_____?
How would you identify _____?
How would you recognize _____?
Define
Define mercantilism.
Who
Who was the author of "Billy Budd?"
What
What is the capital of England?
Name
Name the inventor of the telephone.
List
List the 13 original colonies.
Label
Label the capitals on this map of the United States.
Locate
Locate the glossary in your textbook.
Match
Match the following inventors with their inventions.
Select
Select the correct author of "War and Peace" from the following list.
Underline
Underline the noun.
25. 2. Understand
At this point, learners might be asked to explain a concept in their own words, describe a
mathematical graph or clarify a metaphor.
The processes associated with understanding are:
•Interpreting implies changing from one form of representation to another. It might be transforming
numerical information into verbal.
•Exemplifying is finding a specific illustration of a concept or principle. It may be giving several
examples of Suprematist paintings.
•Classifying is determining a category of something. An example is the classification of mental
disorders.
•Summarizing means retrieving a general theme of significant points (e.g., writing a short summary
of a story).
•Inferring is drawing a logical conclusion from given information. It may be formulating grammatical
principles of a foreign language from the presented examples.
•Comparing is finding correspondences between two ideas or objects (e.g., comparing historical
events to their contemporary analogues).
•Explaining is constructing a cause-and-effect model of a system, for example, explaining the
causes of the French Revolution.
26. 3. Apply
Now, it’s time to use learned facts and abstractions in
new contexts and particular situations.
For example, students might be asked to discuss
phenomena described in one scientific paper using
terms and concepts of another paper.
The processes of cognition corresponding to this stage
are:
•Executing is applying a procedure to a familiar task
(e.g., calculating the root of a number).
•Implementing is about applying a procedure to an
unfamiliar task (e.g., using Newton’s Second Law in a
27. 4. Analyze
At this level, students are supposed to break down concepts and
examine their relationships.
For instance, they might be asked to recognize the genre of a painting
or describe the leading causes of the Great Depression.
The three particular processes associated with this stage are:
•Differentiating means distinguishing important from unimportant
parts of presented material (e.g., distinguishing between relevant and
irrelevant numbers in a mathematical word problem).
•Organizing involves identifying how elements fit or function within a
structure (e.g., finding the hypothesis, method, data and conclusion in
a research report).
•Attributing means determining a point of view, bias, values, or intent
underlying presented material. An example would be to identify the
author’s point of view of an essay.
28. 5. Evaluate
In this stage, learners are expected to use their knowledge and skills to appraise a
situation, justify their stand or criticize others’ opinions. They should be able to
point out logical fallacies in arguments or compare a work to the highest standards
in its field.
They might be asked, for example:
•In your opinion, is online piracy ethical?
•Do you consider jazz music to be high art?
•What are the most absurd arguments against vegetarianism?
Evaluating is divided into checking and critiquing.
•Checking means detecting inconsistencies or fallacies in a process or product.
For example, it’s determining if a scientist’s conclusions follow from observed data.
•Critiquing involves finding inconsistencies between a product and external
criteria. For instance, it’s judging which of two methods is the best for solving a
problem.
29. 6. Create
This is the most complex stage of the learning process and the top of
the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy.
At this level, learners combine known patterns, ideas and facts to
create original work or formulate their solution to a problem.
They might be asked to compose a song, rewrite a story in another
setting or formulate a hypothesis and propose a way of testing it.
The three associated cognitive processes are:
•Generating involves coming up with alternative hypotheses based on
criteria. An example might be devising multiple solutions for a social
problem.
•Planning is about coming up with a procedure for completing a task
(e.g., preparing an outline of an article).
•Producing means inventing a product (e.g., writing a short story that
takes place during the American Revolution).
31. SUMMARY
P R E S E N TAT I O N T I T L E
At Contoso, we believe in giving 110%. By using
our next-generation data architecture, we help
organizations virtually manage agile workflows.
We thrive because of our market knowledge and
great team behind our product. As our CEO
says, "Efficiencies will come from proactively
transforming how we do business."
3 1