Assessment of Service and Civic
     Engagement (ASCE)



              n
Assessment of Service & Civic
        Engagement (ASCE)
The goals of the study are to:
	 1.	 Provide an assessment tool to assess (on the institutional level)
       a. frequency, type, duration, motivations for, obstacles to, civic
            engagement activity on the part of students
       b. effects of institutionalization on student service and civic
            engagement experiences.

	   2.	 Generate individual level data that will allow institutions to draw
         conclusions about student sub-sets, and the student body as
         a whole, for internal and external descriptive data needs like
         marketing, accreditation, and strategic planning.

	   3.	 Create a national benchmark data-set for comparative analysis
         of civic engagement in higher education (of students and of
         institutions).
ASCE
ASCE
Service & Structures
ASCE   Engagement
ASCE   Types of Service




             Type & Freq
Type
Drill
          Frequency
Down
            Depth
Mode
Institutional Practices
D
             riv
                  e,
                       B
                            en
       Tu                        ef
          t  or
                                      it,
                                            Fu
                   in
                                                                                                                                                              50%
                                               n




                                                                                                                                                       40%




                                                                                                                                 30%




                                                                                                               20%




                                                                                         10%




                                                                         0%
                     g,                             dr
                            C                          a       is
                                 oa
                                      ch                           er
                  R                     in
                    el                    g,
                        ig                          Yo
                             io




                                                                                                                                 28%
                                                      ut
                                 us                                 h
                                        In
                  Lo                      st
                    ca                           itu
                                                                                                                                                                    54%




                                                    tio




                                                                                                                     21%
                            lS
     En                           ou                            n
       vi                            p
              ro                             K
                nm                               itc
                                                       he




                                                                                             11%
 C                en
                                                               n
                                                                                                                                                              48%




   om                            ta
                                      lC
     m                                      le
               un                                an
                                                                                                                                                        39%




                 ity                               -U


                                                                                                   13%
                            Im                             p
                                  pr
                                     ov
                                        e        m
                                                                                                                           24%




                                                                                         10%
                                                  en
                                                           t
                                 El
        H                             de
                                         r
                                                                                                                     21%




             ab
                                                                                        8%
               ita                            C
                                                   ar
                       tf
                            or                         e
  C                              H
                                                                                                               18%




       iti                           um
          ze
                                                                                   6%



              ns                             an
                   hi                          ity
Pu                    p
                            Pr
   b
                                                                                                         14%




     lic                      om
             Sa                             ot
                                               io
                  fe                               n
                       ty
                            C
                                                                                              14% 10%




                             am
                                                                         3%




                                      pa
             So                          i    gn
                  ci
                                                                                  3%




                      al
                            To
                              le
                                                                        2%




                                      ra
                                            nc
                                               e
                                                                                  3%




                  Sp
                    on
                      s
                                                                         4%
                                                                                                                                       HS vs College




                                 or
                                    s   hi
                                           p
                                                                              3%


                                                                   1%
                                                                             1%
Student Satisfaction w/ Service and CE at XYZ College

                   Strongly
                   disagree          Strongly agree
                      7%                  12%




    Disagree
      42%                                     Agree
                                               39%
High School vs. College    No
                          13%




            Yes
            87%




                                 No
                                39%




                  Yes
                  61%
Preliminary Findings

                         Typology:
      One Shot, Continuing but Time Bound, Sustained

               Structure, Structure, Structure

              High School to College Drop-off

           Overestimation by Institutional Actors

                   Useful Planning Tool

Asce

  • 1.
    Assessment of Serviceand Civic Engagement (ASCE) n
  • 2.
    Assessment of Service& Civic Engagement (ASCE) The goals of the study are to: 1. Provide an assessment tool to assess (on the institutional level) a. frequency, type, duration, motivations for, obstacles to, civic engagement activity on the part of students b. effects of institutionalization on student service and civic engagement experiences. 2. Generate individual level data that will allow institutions to draw conclusions about student sub-sets, and the student body as a whole, for internal and external descriptive data needs like marketing, accreditation, and strategic planning. 3. Create a national benchmark data-set for comparative analysis of civic engagement in higher education (of students and of institutions).
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    ASCE Engagement
  • 6.
    ASCE Types of Service Type & Freq
  • 7.
    Type Drill Frequency Down Depth
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    D riv e, B en Tu ef t or it, Fu in 50% n 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% g, dr C a is oa ch er R in el g, ig Yo io 28% ut us h In Lo st ca itu 54% tio 21% lS En ou n vi p ro K nm itc he 11% C en n 48% om ta lC m le un an 39% ity -U 13% Im p pr ov e m 24% 10% en t El H de r 21% ab 8% ita C ar tf or e C H 18% iti um ze 6% ns an hi ity Pu p Pr b 14% lic om Sa ot io fe n ty C 14% 10% am 3% pa So i gn ci 3% al To le 2% ra nc e 3% Sp on s 4% HS vs College or s hi p 3% 1% 1%
  • 12.
    Student Satisfaction w/Service and CE at XYZ College Strongly disagree Strongly agree 7% 12% Disagree 42% Agree 39%
  • 13.
    High School vs.College No 13% Yes 87% No 39% Yes 61%
  • 14.
    Preliminary Findings Typology: One Shot, Continuing but Time Bound, Sustained Structure, Structure, Structure High School to College Drop-off Overestimation by Institutional Actors Useful Planning Tool