SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Article 39
    To Reverse Citizens United and
Support the People’s Rights Amendment
Federal Election
             Commission
• 5-4 decision striking down McCain-Feingold, the
  Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, as
  unconstitutional
• Law prohibited corps. from electioneering spending
  within 30 days of a federal primary election, and
  FEC prevented corp. ad campaign v. Hillary Clinton
• Ruling – corps. have constitutional right of freedom
  of speech and the government may not regulate
  corp. spending on elections
• Overturning Supreme Court precedents in 1990
  (Austin) and 2003 (McConnell)(Rehnquist)
How much is spent lobbying in DC?

           Top 10 1998-2010 (Top 20 total = nearly $4B)

•   US Chamber of Commerce                   $770,655,680
•   American Medical Association              252,037,500
•   General Electric                          251,940,000
•   AARP                                      207,432,064
•   PhRMA                                     204,433,920
•   American Hospital Association             203,648,736
•   Blue Cross/Blue Shield                    169,655,236
•   National Association of Realtors          166,150,553
•   Northrup Grumman                          164,845,253
•   ExxonMobil                                156,692,742
•   Verizon Communications                    158,014,841
Lobbying Expenditures by Industry
•   Finance, Insurance, Real Estate   $4,405,909,610
•   Health                             4,369,979,173
•   Miscellaneous Business             4,352,728,292
•   Communications, Electronics        3,611,482,885
•   Energy, Natural Resources          3,233,636,465
•   Transportation                     2,323,450,594
•   Other                              2,271,149,632
•   Ideology, Single-Issue Lobbies     1,514,021,745
•   Agribusiness                       1,317,839,638
•   Defense                            1,261,711,454
•   Construction                         482,824,245
•   Labor                                441,259,274
•   Lawyers/Lobbyists                    348,111,867
The Quid Pro Quo
• Agribusiness subsidies - $30B in 2010 alone
• Financial Sector – repeal Glass/Steagall, derivatives
• Defense – equipment the Pentagon doesn’t want
• EPA – stop rule-making and enforcement, eliminate
  costs and liabilities of corps.
• Health Care – block reform/end price competition
• The Revolving Door – e.g., Billy Tauzin
  sponsors/passes Medicare Part D, leaves Congress
  to become Pres. of PhRMA
Other Cases – Freedom of Speech for Corps.
• First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (1978) striking
  down MA law banning corp. spending to influence a
  citizen referendum (graduated income tax)
• Central Hudson Gas v. Public Service Corp of NY (1982)
  NY may not prohibit utilities from promoting energy
  consumption
• Lorillard v. Reilly (2001) striking MA regs re: tobacco
  advertising targeting kids (“replacement smokers”)
• International Dairy Foods Assoc. v. Amestoy (2d Cir.
  1996) invalidating VT law re: right to know if milk was
  produced by cows receiving rBST (recombinant DNA
  bovine growth hormone)- corp. constitutional right not to
  speak
• US Chamber of Commerce v SEC (DCCir. 2011) blocking
  SEC rule that required corps. to include directors
  nominated by shareholders in corp. proxy statements
•   Article 39: Proposed People’s Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution:
•      To determine if the Town will resolve to support a people’s rights amendment to
    the United States Constitution as stated in the proposal below:

•   Whereas, we the people of Lincoln Town Meeting affirm our belief that the Bill of
    Rights of the Constitution of the United States, and in particular the First
    Amendment, was adopted to protect the rights of natural persons, not
    corporations;

•   Whereas, we believe that the Supreme Court’s 5-4 majority ruling in Citizens United
    v. Federal Election Commission, which overturned longstanding precedents and
    laws prohibiting corporations from spending their general treasury funds in public
    elections, has unleashed a flood of uncontrolled and often undisclosed corporate
    spending to influence elections and governments;

•   Whereas, we believe this decision presents a serious threat to the conduct of free
    and fair elections, since it permits corporations to drown out the voices of ordinary
    persons, and erodes public trust in our political institutions;

•   Whereas, the Citizens United decision also will undermine the independence of our
    judiciary and impair its perceived impartiality. (Twenty-one states have elected
    Supreme Court justices, and thirty-nine states elect at least some appellate or
    major trial court judges);

•   Whereas, Citizens United presents a serious and direct threat to our democracy
    and our republican self-government of, for, and by the people;

•   Whereas, the people and states of the United States previously have strengthened
    the nation and preserved liberty and equality for all by using the amendment
    process throughout our history, in several instances reversing Supreme Court
    decisions;
•   Now be it therefore resolved to support the following proposed
    amendment to the U.S. Constitution:

•   Section 1: We the people who ordain and establish this
    Constitution intend the rights protected by this Constitution to be
    the rights of natural persons.

•   Section 2: The words people, person, or citizen as used in this
    Constitution do not include corporations, limited liability
    companies or other corporate entities established by the laws of
    any State, the United States, or any foreign state, and such
    corporate entities are subject to such regulation as the
    people, through their elected State and Federal
    representatives, deem reasonable and are otherwise consistent
    with the powers of Congress and the States under this
    Constitution.

•   Section 3: Nothing contained herein shall be construed to limit the
    people’s rights of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, free
    exercise of religion, freedom of association, and all such other
    rights of the people, which rights are inalienable.

•   We ask that our Town Selectmen send this resolution to the
    Massachusetts General Court, to our representatives in the
    Congress of the United States, and to President Barack Obama.

More Related Content

What's hot

Checks And Balances
Checks And BalancesChecks And Balances
Checks And Balances
jjarvis106
 
NFDW 2022 position paper on era (1)
NFDW 2022 position paper on era (1)NFDW 2022 position paper on era (1)
NFDW 2022 position paper on era (1)
JoeCheray
 
The President
The PresidentThe President
The President
rcambou
 
The Executive Branch | The Presidency
The Executive Branch | The PresidencyThe Executive Branch | The Presidency
The Executive Branch | The Presidency
Aquinas College Economics Department
 
Chapter 7 sec 3 government
Chapter 7 sec 3 governmentChapter 7 sec 3 government
Chapter 7 sec 3 government
mistygoetz
 
Avitors0012345
Avitors0012345Avitors0012345
Political Transparency
Political TransparencyPolitical Transparency
Political Transparency
logdon
 
A2 G&P campaign finance
A2 G&P campaign financeA2 G&P campaign finance
A2 G&P campaign finance
Oliver Pratten
 
ap gov chap 16
ap gov chap 16ap gov chap 16
ap gov chap 16
m15tuhw15e
 
Public Citizen Petition to FERC to Establish Office of Public Participation
Public Citizen Petition to FERC to Establish Office of Public ParticipationPublic Citizen Petition to FERC to Establish Office of Public Participation
Public Citizen Petition to FERC to Establish Office of Public Participation
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter BehaviorsChapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
kbeacom
 
Sociales
SocialesSociales
Sociales
guest92c6f9
 
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional DesignConstitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
atrantham
 
Presidential Nominations and Elections
Presidential Nominations and ElectionsPresidential Nominations and Elections
Presidential Nominations and Elections
atrantham
 
Magleby chapter6 ppt
Magleby chapter6 pptMagleby chapter6 ppt
Magleby chapter6 ppt
Joan Smith
 
AP Government 1989 MC Exam
AP Government 1989 MC ExamAP Government 1989 MC Exam
AP Government 1989 MC Exam
collinbentley1
 
Pol 252 SP15 executives
Pol 252 SP15 executivesPol 252 SP15 executives
Pol 252 SP15 executives
atrantham
 
Political Reform
Political ReformPolitical Reform
Political Reform
Ronald Kimmons
 

What's hot (18)

Checks And Balances
Checks And BalancesChecks And Balances
Checks And Balances
 
NFDW 2022 position paper on era (1)
NFDW 2022 position paper on era (1)NFDW 2022 position paper on era (1)
NFDW 2022 position paper on era (1)
 
The President
The PresidentThe President
The President
 
The Executive Branch | The Presidency
The Executive Branch | The PresidencyThe Executive Branch | The Presidency
The Executive Branch | The Presidency
 
Chapter 7 sec 3 government
Chapter 7 sec 3 governmentChapter 7 sec 3 government
Chapter 7 sec 3 government
 
Avitors0012345
Avitors0012345Avitors0012345
Avitors0012345
 
Political Transparency
Political TransparencyPolitical Transparency
Political Transparency
 
A2 G&P campaign finance
A2 G&P campaign financeA2 G&P campaign finance
A2 G&P campaign finance
 
ap gov chap 16
ap gov chap 16ap gov chap 16
ap gov chap 16
 
Public Citizen Petition to FERC to Establish Office of Public Participation
Public Citizen Petition to FERC to Establish Office of Public ParticipationPublic Citizen Petition to FERC to Establish Office of Public Participation
Public Citizen Petition to FERC to Establish Office of Public Participation
 
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter BehaviorsChapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
Chapter 6: Voters & Voter Behaviors
 
Sociales
SocialesSociales
Sociales
 
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional DesignConstitutions and Constitutional Design
Constitutions and Constitutional Design
 
Presidential Nominations and Elections
Presidential Nominations and ElectionsPresidential Nominations and Elections
Presidential Nominations and Elections
 
Magleby chapter6 ppt
Magleby chapter6 pptMagleby chapter6 ppt
Magleby chapter6 ppt
 
AP Government 1989 MC Exam
AP Government 1989 MC ExamAP Government 1989 MC Exam
AP Government 1989 MC Exam
 
Pol 252 SP15 executives
Pol 252 SP15 executivesPol 252 SP15 executives
Pol 252 SP15 executives
 
Political Reform
Political ReformPolitical Reform
Political Reform
 

Similar to Article 39 Citizens United

Brian Moore For Governor of Florida/DEMOCRAT
Brian  Moore For  Governor of Florida/DEMOCRATBrian  Moore For  Governor of Florida/DEMOCRAT
Brian Moore For Governor of Florida/DEMOCRAT
jenkan04
 
Citizens United Speech
Citizens United SpeechCitizens United Speech
Citizens United Speech
papease
 
Citizens United Presentation
Citizens United PresentationCitizens United Presentation
Citizens United Presentation
papease
 
Court white paper
Court white paperCourt white paper
Court white paper
Havas PR
 
Court white paper
Court white paperCourt white paper
Court white paper
Havas PR
 
American Companies Unlimited
American Companies UnlimitedAmerican Companies Unlimited
American Companies Unlimited
HavasPR
 
Citizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The People
Citizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The PeopleCitizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The People
Citizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The People
Linda Sturgeon
 
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
gertrudebellgrove
 
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
gertrudebellgrove
 
Health care bill H.R.3590
Health care bill H.R.3590Health care bill H.R.3590
Health care bill H.R.3590
JaredPWagner
 
7 session-The future of advocacy in Texas
7 session-The future of advocacy in Texas7 session-The future of advocacy in Texas
7 session-The future of advocacy in Texas
txsilc
 
Under the Gold Dome
Under the Gold DomeUnder the Gold Dome
Under the Gold Dome
Deaundra Jackson
 
Enforcing the Medicaid Entitlement
Enforcing the Medicaid EntitlementEnforcing the Medicaid Entitlement
Enforcing the Medicaid Entitlement
Ross Margulies
 
Federal election commission and citizens united
Federal election commission and citizens unitedFederal election commission and citizens united
Federal election commission and citizens united
alwaysalwaysfun
 
Corporate political speech.Sp2016
Corporate political speech.Sp2016Corporate political speech.Sp2016
Corporate political speech.Sp2016
Michael Park
 
Influencing public policy
Influencing public policyInfluencing public policy
Influencing public policy
professorgoff
 
Religion, policy, and the public workplace
Religion, policy, and the public workplaceReligion, policy, and the public workplace
Religion, policy, and the public workplace
taratoot
 
Trans-Pacific Partnership and Fast Track Powerpoint
Trans-Pacific Partnership and Fast Track PowerpointTrans-Pacific Partnership and Fast Track Powerpoint
Trans-Pacific Partnership and Fast Track Powerpoint
bootsmade4walkin
 
Influencing Public Policy
Influencing Public PolicyInfluencing Public Policy
Influencing Public Policy
professorgoff
 
Public interest litigation
Public interest litigationPublic interest litigation
Public interest litigation
MOULA HUSSAIN KHATTHEWALE
 

Similar to Article 39 Citizens United (20)

Brian Moore For Governor of Florida/DEMOCRAT
Brian  Moore For  Governor of Florida/DEMOCRATBrian  Moore For  Governor of Florida/DEMOCRAT
Brian Moore For Governor of Florida/DEMOCRAT
 
Citizens United Speech
Citizens United SpeechCitizens United Speech
Citizens United Speech
 
Citizens United Presentation
Citizens United PresentationCitizens United Presentation
Citizens United Presentation
 
Court white paper
Court white paperCourt white paper
Court white paper
 
Court white paper
Court white paperCourt white paper
Court white paper
 
American Companies Unlimited
American Companies UnlimitedAmerican Companies Unlimited
American Companies Unlimited
 
Citizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The People
Citizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The PeopleCitizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The People
Citizens United Is Unconstitutional - Restore Democracy to The People
 
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
 
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
- FIRST EXAM SPRING 20201. Describe how the view of operations.docx
 
Health care bill H.R.3590
Health care bill H.R.3590Health care bill H.R.3590
Health care bill H.R.3590
 
7 session-The future of advocacy in Texas
7 session-The future of advocacy in Texas7 session-The future of advocacy in Texas
7 session-The future of advocacy in Texas
 
Under the Gold Dome
Under the Gold DomeUnder the Gold Dome
Under the Gold Dome
 
Enforcing the Medicaid Entitlement
Enforcing the Medicaid EntitlementEnforcing the Medicaid Entitlement
Enforcing the Medicaid Entitlement
 
Federal election commission and citizens united
Federal election commission and citizens unitedFederal election commission and citizens united
Federal election commission and citizens united
 
Corporate political speech.Sp2016
Corporate political speech.Sp2016Corporate political speech.Sp2016
Corporate political speech.Sp2016
 
Influencing public policy
Influencing public policyInfluencing public policy
Influencing public policy
 
Religion, policy, and the public workplace
Religion, policy, and the public workplaceReligion, policy, and the public workplace
Religion, policy, and the public workplace
 
Trans-Pacific Partnership and Fast Track Powerpoint
Trans-Pacific Partnership and Fast Track PowerpointTrans-Pacific Partnership and Fast Track Powerpoint
Trans-Pacific Partnership and Fast Track Powerpoint
 
Influencing Public Policy
Influencing Public PolicyInfluencing Public Policy
Influencing Public Policy
 
Public interest litigation
Public interest litigationPublic interest litigation
Public interest litigation
 

Article 39 Citizens United

  • 1. Article 39 To Reverse Citizens United and Support the People’s Rights Amendment
  • 2. Federal Election Commission • 5-4 decision striking down McCain-Feingold, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, as unconstitutional • Law prohibited corps. from electioneering spending within 30 days of a federal primary election, and FEC prevented corp. ad campaign v. Hillary Clinton • Ruling – corps. have constitutional right of freedom of speech and the government may not regulate corp. spending on elections • Overturning Supreme Court precedents in 1990 (Austin) and 2003 (McConnell)(Rehnquist)
  • 3. How much is spent lobbying in DC? Top 10 1998-2010 (Top 20 total = nearly $4B) • US Chamber of Commerce $770,655,680 • American Medical Association 252,037,500 • General Electric 251,940,000 • AARP 207,432,064 • PhRMA 204,433,920 • American Hospital Association 203,648,736 • Blue Cross/Blue Shield 169,655,236 • National Association of Realtors 166,150,553 • Northrup Grumman 164,845,253 • ExxonMobil 156,692,742 • Verizon Communications 158,014,841
  • 4. Lobbying Expenditures by Industry • Finance, Insurance, Real Estate $4,405,909,610 • Health 4,369,979,173 • Miscellaneous Business 4,352,728,292 • Communications, Electronics 3,611,482,885 • Energy, Natural Resources 3,233,636,465 • Transportation 2,323,450,594 • Other 2,271,149,632 • Ideology, Single-Issue Lobbies 1,514,021,745 • Agribusiness 1,317,839,638 • Defense 1,261,711,454 • Construction 482,824,245 • Labor 441,259,274 • Lawyers/Lobbyists 348,111,867
  • 5. The Quid Pro Quo • Agribusiness subsidies - $30B in 2010 alone • Financial Sector – repeal Glass/Steagall, derivatives • Defense – equipment the Pentagon doesn’t want • EPA – stop rule-making and enforcement, eliminate costs and liabilities of corps. • Health Care – block reform/end price competition • The Revolving Door – e.g., Billy Tauzin sponsors/passes Medicare Part D, leaves Congress to become Pres. of PhRMA
  • 6. Other Cases – Freedom of Speech for Corps. • First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (1978) striking down MA law banning corp. spending to influence a citizen referendum (graduated income tax) • Central Hudson Gas v. Public Service Corp of NY (1982) NY may not prohibit utilities from promoting energy consumption • Lorillard v. Reilly (2001) striking MA regs re: tobacco advertising targeting kids (“replacement smokers”) • International Dairy Foods Assoc. v. Amestoy (2d Cir. 1996) invalidating VT law re: right to know if milk was produced by cows receiving rBST (recombinant DNA bovine growth hormone)- corp. constitutional right not to speak • US Chamber of Commerce v SEC (DCCir. 2011) blocking SEC rule that required corps. to include directors nominated by shareholders in corp. proxy statements
  • 7.
  • 8. Article 39: Proposed People’s Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution: • To determine if the Town will resolve to support a people’s rights amendment to the United States Constitution as stated in the proposal below: • Whereas, we the people of Lincoln Town Meeting affirm our belief that the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States, and in particular the First Amendment, was adopted to protect the rights of natural persons, not corporations; • Whereas, we believe that the Supreme Court’s 5-4 majority ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which overturned longstanding precedents and laws prohibiting corporations from spending their general treasury funds in public elections, has unleashed a flood of uncontrolled and often undisclosed corporate spending to influence elections and governments; • Whereas, we believe this decision presents a serious threat to the conduct of free and fair elections, since it permits corporations to drown out the voices of ordinary persons, and erodes public trust in our political institutions; • Whereas, the Citizens United decision also will undermine the independence of our judiciary and impair its perceived impartiality. (Twenty-one states have elected Supreme Court justices, and thirty-nine states elect at least some appellate or major trial court judges); • Whereas, Citizens United presents a serious and direct threat to our democracy and our republican self-government of, for, and by the people; • Whereas, the people and states of the United States previously have strengthened the nation and preserved liberty and equality for all by using the amendment process throughout our history, in several instances reversing Supreme Court decisions;
  • 9. Now be it therefore resolved to support the following proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution: • Section 1: We the people who ordain and establish this Constitution intend the rights protected by this Constitution to be the rights of natural persons. • Section 2: The words people, person, or citizen as used in this Constitution do not include corporations, limited liability companies or other corporate entities established by the laws of any State, the United States, or any foreign state, and such corporate entities are subject to such regulation as the people, through their elected State and Federal representatives, deem reasonable and are otherwise consistent with the powers of Congress and the States under this Constitution. • Section 3: Nothing contained herein shall be construed to limit the people’s rights of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, free exercise of religion, freedom of association, and all such other rights of the people, which rights are inalienable. • We ask that our Town Selectmen send this resolution to the Massachusetts General Court, to our representatives in the Congress of the United States, and to President Barack Obama.