The document outlines rubrics for assessing student assignments in an Architectural Design course. There are 6 assignments involving 2D and 3D modeling, application of design principles, and developing a design proposal. Each assignment is evaluated on 4-5 parameters such as presentation skills, understanding of concepts, creativity, and technical execution. The rubrics describe performance levels from excellent to fair, assigning score ranges from 0-5 or 0-20 for each parameter and total scores. The assignments allow students to demonstrate comprehension of topics like composition, space generation, anthropometry, and evolution of design concepts.
Design communication (degree) assignment 2b-2015aswadtheman
1. The document provides instructions for a student project to create axonometric and perspective drawings of the Farnsworth House. It outlines the learning outcomes, tasks, submission requirements, assessment criteria, and marking rubric for evaluating the drawings.
2. Students will generate pencil constructions and final ink drawings of an external and sectional axonometric, as well as one-point and two-point perspectives of the building. They will be evaluated on their ability to construct and understand the drawings, accurately depict architectural details, and creatively compose the drawings.
3. A marking rubric is provided to assess students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through an understanding of the techniques, accuracy of details, and visual strengths
Design communication (degree) assignment 2b-2015Chow Hong Da
1. The document provides instructions for a student project to produce axonometric and perspective drawings of the Farnsworth House. It outlines the learning outcomes, tasks, assessment criteria, methodology, and references for the project.
2. Students will generate pencil constructions and final ink drawings of external and sectional axonometrics, and one-point and two-point perspectives of the house over several workshop sessions. Their understanding of the techniques and architectural details will be evaluated.
3. Assessment will focus on the students' mastery of the techniques, clarity in communicating spatial understanding and details, and the composition and quality of their drawings.
1. The document provides instructions for a student project to create axonometric and perspective drawings of the Farnsworth House. It outlines the learning outcomes, tasks, submission requirements, assessment criteria, and marking rubric for evaluating the drawings.
2. Students will generate pencil constructions and final ink drawings of an external and sectional axonometric, as well as one-point and two-point perspectives of the building. They will be evaluated on their ability to construct and understand the drawings, accurately depict architectural details, and creatively compose the drawings.
3. A marking rubric is provided to assess students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through an understanding of the techniques, accuracy of details, and visual strengths
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a student project to construct one-point and two-point perspectives of architectural spaces. Students must demonstrate the ability to express spatial ideas in 3D through perspective drawings, an understanding of 2D and 3D relationships, and drawing skills. For the two-point perspective, students will select an exterior view and construct the perspective on grid paper. For the one-point perspective, students will select an interior section and construct the perspective. Students will be assessed based on the clarity of architectural communication through the perspectives, evidence of 2D and 3D understanding, and the creativity and complexity of the drawings. A rubric is provided to guide assessment based on the stated learning outcomes.
NEF1103 – Engineering and the Community Assignment 3
Assignment 3 – Team Project Report
Engineers without Borders 2015 Project
1.0 Assignment Description
Reignite Action for Development (RAfD) is focused on empowering rural African communities to break out
of the poverty cycle. The Engineers without Borders (EWB) Challenge is an Australasian design program
that provides first-year university students with the opportunity to learn about design, sustainable development,
teamwork, and communication, while contributing towards real international development projects [1].
In 2015, EWB has partnered with RAfD and identified a range of areas for growth within the district of
Bambui in Cameroon. The recent construction of a new university is causing rapid urbanization in the rural
Bambui community and increasing the pressure on the existing water supply, sanitation, water management,
and available housing facilities. They are now inviting students to use their problem solving and design skills to
develop innovative and appropriate project solutions to make a real contribution towards the sustainable
development of the rural Bambui community. You will be required to work in teams of 4 to 5 on the identified
projects areas. More information could be located on http://www.ewbchallenge.org/reignite [2].
Nine design areas have been identified by EWB and RAfD. Several project ideas are being suggested for each
design area [3, 4]. Your team is required to identify a design area and choose one of the suggested projects with
a sustainability focus and work towards designing a solution to that problem. Please refer to the EWB website
for more detailed information about each project, design requirements, as well as other supporting resources.
Your design proposal satisfying all the EWB design considerations and reporting requirements should be
documented in a team report and submitted by Friday, Week 11.
After your work is assessed and reviewed this semester, you may be given the opportunity to continue working
on this EWB project during the first six weeks of Semester 2 in NEF1204. Two high quality reports detailing
exceptional quality work will be officially sent to the EWB competition to compete against the work of other
students’ from other Universities. If your team’s report scores highly, you will move onto the regional and then
national showcases, where you will have the opportunity to present your reports to members of the EWB.
2.0 Deliverable
On the completion of this problem, your team will have produced a single hardcopy team report. The report
should be about 5000 words, word processed with correct spelling, grammar, and referencing employed. The
report is due Friday, Week 11. Individuals must indicate which sections they were responsible for in the team
report by marking their initials in the Contents .
This document provides instructions for a student project to create axonometric projections of the Farnsworth House. It outlines the objectives, learning outcomes, and tasks of the project. Students are asked to generate pencil drawings of an external and sectional axonometric projection of the house at a scale of 1:75 on paper, then finalize the drawings with ink on tracing paper. The document provides assessment criteria focusing on the student's understanding and ability to generate axonometric drawings, communicate architectural details accurately, and produce neat drawings. A marking rubric is also included to evaluate students based on their mastery of axonometric techniques, comprehension of the building design, and efforts to enhance the drawings.
This document provides instructions for a project on axonometric projections for an architecture course. It consists of 3 main parts:
1. An introduction outlining what axonometric projections are and how they can be used to communicate architectural ideas.
2. Details of the project tasks which involve generating an exploded axonometric drawing of a building from orthographic drawings using pencil and paper, then finalizing the drawing with ink.
3. A marking rubric that will be used to assess students based on their understanding of axonometric projections, ability to convey architectural details and spatial relationships, and quality of drawing skills. Students will be graded on a scale of 0 to 5.
Design communication (degree) assignment 2c-2015aswadtheman
This document outlines an assignment for an architecture course to create one-point and two-point perspective drawings. Students are instructed to select views of a building exterior and interior and construct perspective grids to develop the drawings. The objectives are to demonstrate spatial understanding and drawing skills. Assessment criteria include clarity of communication, understanding of 2D to 3D translation, and creativity. A rubric is provided to evaluate students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through the perspective constructions, depiction of architectural details, and enhancement of the drawings.
Design communication (degree) assignment 2b-2015aswadtheman
1. The document provides instructions for a student project to create axonometric and perspective drawings of the Farnsworth House. It outlines the learning outcomes, tasks, submission requirements, assessment criteria, and marking rubric for evaluating the drawings.
2. Students will generate pencil constructions and final ink drawings of an external and sectional axonometric, as well as one-point and two-point perspectives of the building. They will be evaluated on their ability to construct and understand the drawings, accurately depict architectural details, and creatively compose the drawings.
3. A marking rubric is provided to assess students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through an understanding of the techniques, accuracy of details, and visual strengths
Design communication (degree) assignment 2b-2015Chow Hong Da
1. The document provides instructions for a student project to produce axonometric and perspective drawings of the Farnsworth House. It outlines the learning outcomes, tasks, assessment criteria, methodology, and references for the project.
2. Students will generate pencil constructions and final ink drawings of external and sectional axonometrics, and one-point and two-point perspectives of the house over several workshop sessions. Their understanding of the techniques and architectural details will be evaluated.
3. Assessment will focus on the students' mastery of the techniques, clarity in communicating spatial understanding and details, and the composition and quality of their drawings.
1. The document provides instructions for a student project to create axonometric and perspective drawings of the Farnsworth House. It outlines the learning outcomes, tasks, submission requirements, assessment criteria, and marking rubric for evaluating the drawings.
2. Students will generate pencil constructions and final ink drawings of an external and sectional axonometric, as well as one-point and two-point perspectives of the building. They will be evaluated on their ability to construct and understand the drawings, accurately depict architectural details, and creatively compose the drawings.
3. A marking rubric is provided to assess students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through an understanding of the techniques, accuracy of details, and visual strengths
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a student project to construct one-point and two-point perspectives of architectural spaces. Students must demonstrate the ability to express spatial ideas in 3D through perspective drawings, an understanding of 2D and 3D relationships, and drawing skills. For the two-point perspective, students will select an exterior view and construct the perspective on grid paper. For the one-point perspective, students will select an interior section and construct the perspective. Students will be assessed based on the clarity of architectural communication through the perspectives, evidence of 2D and 3D understanding, and the creativity and complexity of the drawings. A rubric is provided to guide assessment based on the stated learning outcomes.
NEF1103 – Engineering and the Community Assignment 3
Assignment 3 – Team Project Report
Engineers without Borders 2015 Project
1.0 Assignment Description
Reignite Action for Development (RAfD) is focused on empowering rural African communities to break out
of the poverty cycle. The Engineers without Borders (EWB) Challenge is an Australasian design program
that provides first-year university students with the opportunity to learn about design, sustainable development,
teamwork, and communication, while contributing towards real international development projects [1].
In 2015, EWB has partnered with RAfD and identified a range of areas for growth within the district of
Bambui in Cameroon. The recent construction of a new university is causing rapid urbanization in the rural
Bambui community and increasing the pressure on the existing water supply, sanitation, water management,
and available housing facilities. They are now inviting students to use their problem solving and design skills to
develop innovative and appropriate project solutions to make a real contribution towards the sustainable
development of the rural Bambui community. You will be required to work in teams of 4 to 5 on the identified
projects areas. More information could be located on http://www.ewbchallenge.org/reignite [2].
Nine design areas have been identified by EWB and RAfD. Several project ideas are being suggested for each
design area [3, 4]. Your team is required to identify a design area and choose one of the suggested projects with
a sustainability focus and work towards designing a solution to that problem. Please refer to the EWB website
for more detailed information about each project, design requirements, as well as other supporting resources.
Your design proposal satisfying all the EWB design considerations and reporting requirements should be
documented in a team report and submitted by Friday, Week 11.
After your work is assessed and reviewed this semester, you may be given the opportunity to continue working
on this EWB project during the first six weeks of Semester 2 in NEF1204. Two high quality reports detailing
exceptional quality work will be officially sent to the EWB competition to compete against the work of other
students’ from other Universities. If your team’s report scores highly, you will move onto the regional and then
national showcases, where you will have the opportunity to present your reports to members of the EWB.
2.0 Deliverable
On the completion of this problem, your team will have produced a single hardcopy team report. The report
should be about 5000 words, word processed with correct spelling, grammar, and referencing employed. The
report is due Friday, Week 11. Individuals must indicate which sections they were responsible for in the team
report by marking their initials in the Contents .
This document provides instructions for a student project to create axonometric projections of the Farnsworth House. It outlines the objectives, learning outcomes, and tasks of the project. Students are asked to generate pencil drawings of an external and sectional axonometric projection of the house at a scale of 1:75 on paper, then finalize the drawings with ink on tracing paper. The document provides assessment criteria focusing on the student's understanding and ability to generate axonometric drawings, communicate architectural details accurately, and produce neat drawings. A marking rubric is also included to evaluate students based on their mastery of axonometric techniques, comprehension of the building design, and efforts to enhance the drawings.
This document provides instructions for a project on axonometric projections for an architecture course. It consists of 3 main parts:
1. An introduction outlining what axonometric projections are and how they can be used to communicate architectural ideas.
2. Details of the project tasks which involve generating an exploded axonometric drawing of a building from orthographic drawings using pencil and paper, then finalizing the drawing with ink.
3. A marking rubric that will be used to assess students based on their understanding of axonometric projections, ability to convey architectural details and spatial relationships, and quality of drawing skills. Students will be graded on a scale of 0 to 5.
Design communication (degree) assignment 2c-2015aswadtheman
This document outlines an assignment for an architecture course to create one-point and two-point perspective drawings. Students are instructed to select views of a building exterior and interior and construct perspective grids to develop the drawings. The objectives are to demonstrate spatial understanding and drawing skills. Assessment criteria include clarity of communication, understanding of 2D to 3D translation, and creativity. A rubric is provided to evaluate students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through the perspective constructions, depiction of architectural details, and enhancement of the drawings.
Design communication (degree) assignment 2c-2015Chow Hong Da
This document outlines an assignment for an architecture course to create one-point and two-point perspective drawings. Students are instructed to select views of a building exterior and interior and construct perspective grids to develop the drawings. The objectives are to demonstrate spatial understanding and drawing skills. Assessment criteria include clarity of communication, understanding of 2D to 3D translation, and creativity. A rubric is provided to evaluate students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through the perspective constructions, depiction of architectural details, and enhancement of the drawings.
This document outlines an assignment for an architecture course to create one-point and two-point perspective drawings. Students are instructed to select views of a building exterior and interior and construct perspective grids to develop the drawings. The objectives are to demonstrate spatial understanding and drawing skills. Assessment criteria include clarity of communication, understanding of 2D to 3D translation, and creativity. A rubric is provided to evaluate students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through the perspective constructions, depiction of architectural details, and enhancement of the drawings.
This document outlines an assignment for an architecture course to create one-point and two-point perspective drawings. Students are instructed to select views of a building exterior and interior and construct perspective grids to develop the drawings. The objectives are to demonstrate spatial understanding and drawing skills. Assessment criteria include clarity of communication, understanding of 2D to 3D translation, and creativity. A rubric is provided to evaluate students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through perspective construction, depiction of architectural details, and enhancement of the drawings.
This document provides a grading grid for assessing student work on three criteria:
1) Explanation, analysis, and argument - It outlines four levels of achievement from basic to excellent in discussing concepts and relating creative outcomes to media theory.
2) Use of examples - It describes expectations for the range and relevance of examples from the student's own production used to illustrate theoretical ideas.
3) Use of terminology - It establishes standards for using conceptual language from minimal to excellent usage of relevant terms.
This document summarizes the structure and requirements of the OCR Advanced Subsidiary GCE in Media Studies. It includes:
- Two units, G321 Foundation Portfolio in Media (coursework) and G322 Key Media Concepts (written exam on TV drama).
- For G321, students complete a preliminary video task and main video production, plus research and evaluation. The main task is 2 minutes and involves original video/audio.
- For G322, Section A involves analyzing technical aspects like camerawork, editing, sound, and mise-en-scene in an unseen TV drama extract. Section B addresses media institutions, audiences, and related concepts.
- Both units assess knowledge
The document provides information about an assignment to analyze the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Students are asked to write a 3,000 word report analyzing the historical development of the Games including planning, funding, economic and social legacy, sports participation, and use as a catalyst for development. Sources must be cited using Harvard referencing style. The assignment criteria, learning outcomes, and grading rubric are also outlined.
This document contains the syllabus for the first year first semester courses for the B.Sc. (Hons.) in Computer Science and Engineering program at Jahangirnagar University for 2018-19. It outlines 7 courses that will be offered: Viva-Voce, Mathematics I, Communicative English, and Structured Programming. For each course it provides information on course code, credits, prerequisites, type of course, contact hours, objectives, learning outcomes, course descriptions and recommended textbooks.
This document outlines the requirements for Project 3 of an architecture design studio course. Students must design an interpretive center that emphasizes the unique character of its site and engages visitors. The center must provide 450 square meters of space, including rooms like reception, exhibition space, and a cafeteria. Students will develop their design through schematic plans and sections, considering circulation, spatial experiences, and building materials. They will present interim and final submissions with drawings, models, and diagrams demonstrating their response to the site context, program, and how their design expresses the spirit of place.
Project brief 3 architecture studio 3 s1 2015 (4)Anthony Chew
This document outlines the requirements for Project 3 of an architecture design studio course. Students must design an interpretive center that emphasizes the unique character of its site and engages visitors. The center must provide 450 square meters of space, including rooms like reception, exhibition space, and a cafeteria. Students will develop their design through schematic plans and sections, considering circulation, spatial experiences, and building materials. They will present interim and final submissions demonstrating their response to the site context, program, and how their design conveys the "spirit of place."
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project proposal. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual design process, and master plan. The drawings will be assessed based on demonstrated understanding of the brief, creative design ideas and representation, and quality of graphic communication. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate students' understanding of landscape design components and representation of design ideas.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual diagrams, and master plan. The drawings must demonstrate the design process and proposed design. Students will be evaluated based on their understanding of the brief, research and design ideas presented, and the quality and creativity of their graphic communication skills. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate students' ability to apply a design process and landscape design components to a project.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project proposal. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual design process, and master plan. The drawings will be assessed based on demonstrated understanding of the brief, creative design ideas and representation, and quality of graphic communication. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate students' understanding of landscape design components and representation of design ideas.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual design, and master plan. The drawings will be assessed based on demonstrated understanding of the brief, quality of work, creativity, and inclusion of progression drawings. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate students' ability to apply design process and landscape design components through visual representation of their ideas.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual diagrams, and master plan. The drawings must demonstrate the design process and proposed design. Students will be evaluated based on their understanding of the brief, research and design ideas presented, and the quality, creativity and technical proficiency of their drawings and graphic communication. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate students' knowledge of landscape design development and representation techniques.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual design, and master plan. The drawings will be assessed based on demonstrated understanding of the brief, creative application of graphic skills, and quality of work. Successful completion of the project will enable students to demonstrate understanding of landscape design process and components.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual diagrams, and master plan. The drawings must demonstrate the design process and ideas. Students will be evaluated based on their understanding of the brief, research, creative application of graphics skills, and representation of design ideas. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate knowledge of landscape design development and processes.
A) RUBRIK DGP6152 PROJEK 2 tahun 2024 20252022.docxbayazid11
The document outlines the learning outcomes and assessment criteria for Project 2 of the DGP6152 course. It includes 3 program learning outcomes (PLOs) related to analyzing process engineering problems, applying appropriate engineering tools, and understanding engineering impacts. It also lists 3 course learning outcomes (CLOs) regarding creating technical reports, assembling hardware, and presenting project outputs. The project will be assessed based on a project report, presentation, and supervisor progress reports, with specific weighting given to each PLO and CLO. The subsequent pages provide rubrics to evaluate students' file log activities, progress reports, presentations, and demonstration of innovation in their selected project.
SIM335 Managing Projects
1
Faculty of Business and Law
Level: 3 Module: Managing Projects (Full-Time)
Assignment Code: SIM335 Module Leader: Peter Coleman
Issue date: 10-April-2017 Return date: 1-Sep-2017
Contribution to module assessment: 100%
Students are required to submit their assignments through JIRA. Only assessments
submitted through JIRA will be marked. Any other submission including
submission to your study centre in hard copy will be treated as a non-submission
This is an individual assignment - complete both tasks 1 and 2
Background: The assignment is intended to bring out the benefits and limitations of
different approaches to project planning and control by relating these to the
circumstances in the cases outlined. It is also intended to allow students to demonstrate
their learning and competence in respect of the effective project management with focus
on resources, trade-offs among scope, cost and time, as well as key elements of the
project life cycle.
Task 1 (40 marks) 700 words (+/- 10%) each short answer question requires a
response in a few sentences for the questions awarded up to 4 – 6 marks and a paragraph
for questions awarded up to 8 – 10 marks. Citations are essential to demonstrate
students’ ability to fulfill academic writing style in accordance to Harvard referencing.
1) Project Control Systems are often used to ensure the quality of project outcomes.
Identify and briefly discuss methods (project evaluation, monitoring and control) you
could introduce to ensure a project meets the desired outcome and is successful.
(8 marks)
2) Smart Apps Pte Ltd, with business operations in Singapore, develops Apps for IOS and
Android. The company business portfolio consists of 50% customised Apps
development projects and 50% providing standarize Apps training courses. Which
project structure would you recommend for this organisation? Together with a
diagram, write short notes to describe the proposed structure and provide
appropriate justifications to support your recommendation. (6 marks)
3) What is the purpose of setting project priorities? And what would normally be
considered when setting project priorities. (6 marks)
4) Identify and briefly discuss the FOUR (4) determinants of project success. (4 marks)
5) Identify and discuss THREE (3) project closure deliverables. (6 marks)
SIM335 Managing Projects
2
6) Your organisation is undergoing expansion and needs to be relocated to another
premises in order to accommodate additional headcount in the months ahead.
Appointed as the project manager to spearhead the office relocation work, you have
mapped out the activities and durations in the table below:
Activity ID Description Preceding
Activity
Activity
Duration
A Permit applica.
This document contains an assessment of student work on an interview assignment. The assignment asked students to conduct a mock television interview about tourism in the Italian region of Valle d'Aosta from the perspective of various stakeholders.
The work being assessed included a written transcript of an interview between the Mayor of Aosta and a TV interviewer. The assessment found that the student demonstrated a superficial understanding of how tourism has impacted the region over time, but did not adequately address differing viewpoints or interactions between humans and the environment as required by the assignment.
Arc1126 project 2b retreat house (aug 2015)Chow Hong Da
This document provides instructions and requirements for an architectural design studio project to design a 150m2 retreat house at Cape Rachado, Port Dickson. The objectives are to introduce concepts of program, space, form and function through a user-specific design that responds to the site context. Students must submit sketches, diagrams, a site analysis, and architectural drawings and a model of their design at scales of 1:100 and 1:500. The project will be evaluated based on the clear communication of concept and appropriate form, space and engagement with the site context.
Design communication (degree) assignment 2c-2015Chow Hong Da
This document outlines an assignment for an architecture course to create one-point and two-point perspective drawings. Students are instructed to select views of a building exterior and interior and construct perspective grids to develop the drawings. The objectives are to demonstrate spatial understanding and drawing skills. Assessment criteria include clarity of communication, understanding of 2D to 3D translation, and creativity. A rubric is provided to evaluate students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through the perspective constructions, depiction of architectural details, and enhancement of the drawings.
This document outlines an assignment for an architecture course to create one-point and two-point perspective drawings. Students are instructed to select views of a building exterior and interior and construct perspective grids to develop the drawings. The objectives are to demonstrate spatial understanding and drawing skills. Assessment criteria include clarity of communication, understanding of 2D to 3D translation, and creativity. A rubric is provided to evaluate students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through the perspective constructions, depiction of architectural details, and enhancement of the drawings.
This document outlines an assignment for an architecture course to create one-point and two-point perspective drawings. Students are instructed to select views of a building exterior and interior and construct perspective grids to develop the drawings. The objectives are to demonstrate spatial understanding and drawing skills. Assessment criteria include clarity of communication, understanding of 2D to 3D translation, and creativity. A rubric is provided to evaluate students based on their demonstration of the learning outcomes through perspective construction, depiction of architectural details, and enhancement of the drawings.
This document provides a grading grid for assessing student work on three criteria:
1) Explanation, analysis, and argument - It outlines four levels of achievement from basic to excellent in discussing concepts and relating creative outcomes to media theory.
2) Use of examples - It describes expectations for the range and relevance of examples from the student's own production used to illustrate theoretical ideas.
3) Use of terminology - It establishes standards for using conceptual language from minimal to excellent usage of relevant terms.
This document summarizes the structure and requirements of the OCR Advanced Subsidiary GCE in Media Studies. It includes:
- Two units, G321 Foundation Portfolio in Media (coursework) and G322 Key Media Concepts (written exam on TV drama).
- For G321, students complete a preliminary video task and main video production, plus research and evaluation. The main task is 2 minutes and involves original video/audio.
- For G322, Section A involves analyzing technical aspects like camerawork, editing, sound, and mise-en-scene in an unseen TV drama extract. Section B addresses media institutions, audiences, and related concepts.
- Both units assess knowledge
The document provides information about an assignment to analyze the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Students are asked to write a 3,000 word report analyzing the historical development of the Games including planning, funding, economic and social legacy, sports participation, and use as a catalyst for development. Sources must be cited using Harvard referencing style. The assignment criteria, learning outcomes, and grading rubric are also outlined.
This document contains the syllabus for the first year first semester courses for the B.Sc. (Hons.) in Computer Science and Engineering program at Jahangirnagar University for 2018-19. It outlines 7 courses that will be offered: Viva-Voce, Mathematics I, Communicative English, and Structured Programming. For each course it provides information on course code, credits, prerequisites, type of course, contact hours, objectives, learning outcomes, course descriptions and recommended textbooks.
This document outlines the requirements for Project 3 of an architecture design studio course. Students must design an interpretive center that emphasizes the unique character of its site and engages visitors. The center must provide 450 square meters of space, including rooms like reception, exhibition space, and a cafeteria. Students will develop their design through schematic plans and sections, considering circulation, spatial experiences, and building materials. They will present interim and final submissions with drawings, models, and diagrams demonstrating their response to the site context, program, and how their design expresses the spirit of place.
Project brief 3 architecture studio 3 s1 2015 (4)Anthony Chew
This document outlines the requirements for Project 3 of an architecture design studio course. Students must design an interpretive center that emphasizes the unique character of its site and engages visitors. The center must provide 450 square meters of space, including rooms like reception, exhibition space, and a cafeteria. Students will develop their design through schematic plans and sections, considering circulation, spatial experiences, and building materials. They will present interim and final submissions demonstrating their response to the site context, program, and how their design conveys the "spirit of place."
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project proposal. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual design process, and master plan. The drawings will be assessed based on demonstrated understanding of the brief, creative design ideas and representation, and quality of graphic communication. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate students' understanding of landscape design components and representation of design ideas.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual diagrams, and master plan. The drawings must demonstrate the design process and proposed design. Students will be evaluated based on their understanding of the brief, research and design ideas presented, and the quality and creativity of their graphic communication skills. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate students' ability to apply a design process and landscape design components to a project.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project proposal. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual design process, and master plan. The drawings will be assessed based on demonstrated understanding of the brief, creative design ideas and representation, and quality of graphic communication. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate students' understanding of landscape design components and representation of design ideas.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual design, and master plan. The drawings will be assessed based on demonstrated understanding of the brief, quality of work, creativity, and inclusion of progression drawings. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate students' ability to apply design process and landscape design components through visual representation of their ideas.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual diagrams, and master plan. The drawings must demonstrate the design process and proposed design. Students will be evaluated based on their understanding of the brief, research and design ideas presented, and the quality, creativity and technical proficiency of their drawings and graphic communication. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate students' knowledge of landscape design development and representation techniques.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual design, and master plan. The drawings will be assessed based on demonstrated understanding of the brief, creative application of graphic skills, and quality of work. Successful completion of the project will enable students to demonstrate understanding of landscape design process and components.
This document outlines the requirements and assessment criteria for a landscape design project. Students will work in their original groups to design a small-scale landscape for one of five sites contexts. They must submit a proposal booklet containing drawings that illustrate the project description, conceptual diagrams, and master plan. The drawings must demonstrate the design process and ideas. Students will be evaluated based on their understanding of the brief, research, creative application of graphics skills, and representation of design ideas. Successful completion of the project will demonstrate knowledge of landscape design development and processes.
A) RUBRIK DGP6152 PROJEK 2 tahun 2024 20252022.docxbayazid11
The document outlines the learning outcomes and assessment criteria for Project 2 of the DGP6152 course. It includes 3 program learning outcomes (PLOs) related to analyzing process engineering problems, applying appropriate engineering tools, and understanding engineering impacts. It also lists 3 course learning outcomes (CLOs) regarding creating technical reports, assembling hardware, and presenting project outputs. The project will be assessed based on a project report, presentation, and supervisor progress reports, with specific weighting given to each PLO and CLO. The subsequent pages provide rubrics to evaluate students' file log activities, progress reports, presentations, and demonstration of innovation in their selected project.
SIM335 Managing Projects
1
Faculty of Business and Law
Level: 3 Module: Managing Projects (Full-Time)
Assignment Code: SIM335 Module Leader: Peter Coleman
Issue date: 10-April-2017 Return date: 1-Sep-2017
Contribution to module assessment: 100%
Students are required to submit their assignments through JIRA. Only assessments
submitted through JIRA will be marked. Any other submission including
submission to your study centre in hard copy will be treated as a non-submission
This is an individual assignment - complete both tasks 1 and 2
Background: The assignment is intended to bring out the benefits and limitations of
different approaches to project planning and control by relating these to the
circumstances in the cases outlined. It is also intended to allow students to demonstrate
their learning and competence in respect of the effective project management with focus
on resources, trade-offs among scope, cost and time, as well as key elements of the
project life cycle.
Task 1 (40 marks) 700 words (+/- 10%) each short answer question requires a
response in a few sentences for the questions awarded up to 4 – 6 marks and a paragraph
for questions awarded up to 8 – 10 marks. Citations are essential to demonstrate
students’ ability to fulfill academic writing style in accordance to Harvard referencing.
1) Project Control Systems are often used to ensure the quality of project outcomes.
Identify and briefly discuss methods (project evaluation, monitoring and control) you
could introduce to ensure a project meets the desired outcome and is successful.
(8 marks)
2) Smart Apps Pte Ltd, with business operations in Singapore, develops Apps for IOS and
Android. The company business portfolio consists of 50% customised Apps
development projects and 50% providing standarize Apps training courses. Which
project structure would you recommend for this organisation? Together with a
diagram, write short notes to describe the proposed structure and provide
appropriate justifications to support your recommendation. (6 marks)
3) What is the purpose of setting project priorities? And what would normally be
considered when setting project priorities. (6 marks)
4) Identify and briefly discuss the FOUR (4) determinants of project success. (4 marks)
5) Identify and discuss THREE (3) project closure deliverables. (6 marks)
SIM335 Managing Projects
2
6) Your organisation is undergoing expansion and needs to be relocated to another
premises in order to accommodate additional headcount in the months ahead.
Appointed as the project manager to spearhead the office relocation work, you have
mapped out the activities and durations in the table below:
Activity ID Description Preceding
Activity
Activity
Duration
A Permit applica.
This document contains an assessment of student work on an interview assignment. The assignment asked students to conduct a mock television interview about tourism in the Italian region of Valle d'Aosta from the perspective of various stakeholders.
The work being assessed included a written transcript of an interview between the Mayor of Aosta and a TV interviewer. The assessment found that the student demonstrated a superficial understanding of how tourism has impacted the region over time, but did not adequately address differing viewpoints or interactions between humans and the environment as required by the assignment.
Arc1126 project 2b retreat house (aug 2015)Chow Hong Da
This document provides instructions and requirements for an architectural design studio project to design a 150m2 retreat house at Cape Rachado, Port Dickson. The objectives are to introduce concepts of program, space, form and function through a user-specific design that responds to the site context. Students must submit sketches, diagrams, a site analysis, and architectural drawings and a model of their design at scales of 1:100 and 1:500. The project will be evaluated based on the clear communication of concept and appropriate form, space and engagement with the site context.
We recently hosted the much-anticipated Community Skill Builders Workshop during our June online meeting. This event was a culmination of six months of listening to your feedback and crafting solutions to better support your PMI journey. Here’s a look back at what happened and the exciting developments that emerged from our collaborative efforts.
A Gathering of Minds
We were thrilled to see a diverse group of attendees, including local certified PMI trainers and both new and experienced members eager to contribute their perspectives. The workshop was structured into three dynamic discussion sessions, each led by our dedicated membership advocates.
Key Takeaways and Future Directions
The insights and feedback gathered from these discussions were invaluable. Here are some of the key takeaways and the steps we are taking to address them:
• Enhanced Resource Accessibility: We are working on a new, user-friendly resource page that will make it easier for members to access training materials and real-world application guides.
• Structured Mentorship Program: Plans are underway to launch a mentorship program that will connect members with experienced professionals for guidance and support.
• Increased Networking Opportunities: Expect to see more frequent and varied networking events, both virtual and in-person, to help you build connections and foster a sense of community.
Moving Forward
We are committed to turning your feedback into actionable solutions that enhance your PMI journey. This workshop was just the beginning. By actively participating and sharing your experiences, you have helped shape the future of our Chapter’s offerings.
Thank you to everyone who attended and contributed to the success of the Community Skill Builders Workshop. Your engagement and enthusiasm are what make our Chapter strong and vibrant. Stay tuned for updates on the new initiatives and opportunities to get involved. Together, we are building a community that supports and empowers each other on our PMI journeys.
Stay connected, stay engaged, and let’s continue to grow together!
About PMI Silver Spring Chapter
We are a branch of the Project Management Institute. We offer a platform for project management professionals in Silver Spring, MD, and the DC/Baltimore metro area. Monthly meetings facilitate networking, knowledge sharing, and professional development. For more, visit pmissc.org.
Khushi Saini, An Intern from The Sparks Foundationkhushisaini0924
This is my first task as an Talent Acquisition(Human resources) Intern in The Sparks Foundation on Recruitment, article and posts.
I invitr everyone to look into my work and provide me a quick feedback.
Learnings from Successful Jobs SearchersBruce Bennett
Are you interested to know what actions help in a job search? This webinar is the summary of several individuals who discussed their job search journey for others to follow. You will learn there are common actions that helped them succeed in their quest for gainful employment.
LinkedIn for Your Job Search June 17, 2024Bruce Bennett
This webinar helps you understand and navigate your way through LinkedIn. Topics covered include learning the many elements of your profile, populating your work experience history, and understanding why a profile is more than just a resume. You will be able to identify the different features available on LinkedIn and where to focus your attention. We will teach how to create a job search agent on LinkedIn and explore job applications on LinkedIn.
1. RUBRICS BASED ASSESSMENT for ARC111 - Architectural Design-I
Sections : A2302-A2303
Course Code:ARC111 Course Title: Architectural Design-I
CA
Assignment
Description
Evaluation
Parameter
5 (Excellent) 4 (Very Good) 3 (Good)
2 (Fair & Needs
improvement)
Range
CA-01
Create a 2D
composition and an
abstract composition
that adheres to
established
composition
principles. Your
composition should
effectively
communicate the
Fundamentals of
Design and principles
of Architecture. Your
abstract composition
should demonstrate
originality and a
willingness to explore
unconventional ideas.
(A2 Panel each)
Presentation Skills -
Students exhibit clear,
confident articulation,
showcasing an
organized
presentation with
engaging visuals that
captivate the
audience.
Clear, confident
articulation; organized
presentation;
engaging visuals
Mostly clear
articulation; organized
presentation; adequate
visuals
Adequate articulation;
somewhat organized
presentation; basic
visuals
Inconsistent
articulation;
disorganized
presentation; limited
visuals
0-5
Understanding-
Students expertly
apply the
fundamentals of
Design and principles
of Architecture,
demonstrating a
profound
understanding through
viva.
Expert application of
composition
principles; clear grasp
of concepts
Skillful application of
composition
principles; good
understanding
Adequate application
of composition
principles;
satisfactory
understanding
Partial application of
composition
principles; limited
understanding
0-5
Creativity Skills-
Students display
highly original and
innovative
compositions,
incorporating
experimentation that
elevates the overall
quality of their work.
Highly original and
innovative;
experimentation
evident
Creative elements
present; some
experimentation
Moderate originality;
limited
experimentation
Limited originality;
minimal
experimentation
0-5
Tools & Techniques-
Students expertly
handle tools and
execute techniques,
resulting in flawlessly
executed
compositions that
showcase technical
mastery.
Expert handling of
tools; flawless
technical execution
Proficient use of
tools; high technical
competence
Adequate use of tools;
satisfactory technical
execution
Inconsistent use of
tools; fair technical
execution
0-5
Total Marks 17-20 13-16 09-12 08-05 0-20
CA
Assignment
Description
Evaluation
Parameter
5 (Excellent) 4 (Very Good) 3 (Good)
2 (Fair & Needs
improvement)
Range
2. CA-02
Create basic
geometric shapes such
as a cube, pyramid,
cylinder, or cone
using sheet material
and Use wooden
Sticks to make
geometrical
structures. Pay
attention to the
intersections, edges,
and surfaces. Your
model should clearly
exhibit how linear
elements define
edges, while planar
elements create
surfaces. Document
your process through
photographs.
Presentation of
Linear Elements-
Students expertly
incorporate linear
elements, showcasing
a clear understanding
of 1D & 2D
properties and analyze
points, lines, length,
direction and position.
Expertly integrated
linear elements; clear
understanding of their
role
Skillfully integrated
linear elements; good
understanding of their
role
Adequate integration
of linear elements;
satisfactory
understanding
Limited integration of
linear elements; some
understanding
0-5
Evaluation of Planar
Elements- Students
skillfully integrate
planar elements,
demonstrating base
plane, wall plane,
overhead plane with
analysis of
dimensions, shape,
size, surface,
orientation & position
Expertly incorporated
planar elements;
strong grasp of their
significance
Skillfully
incorporated planar
elements; solid
understanding of their
significance
Adequate
incorporation of
planar elements;
satisfactory
understanding
Limited incorporation
of planar elements;
partial understanding
0-5
Application of
Volumetric
Elements- Students
competently create
volumetric forms,
reflecting a
comprehensive
understanding of how
different volumes
interact within the
composition.
Skillful creation of
volumetric forms;
clear comprehension
of their impact
Competent creation of
volumetric forms;
good comprehension
of their impact
Adequate creation of
volumetric forms;
satisfactory
comprehension
Partial creation of
volumetric forms;
limited
comprehension
0-5
Understanding of
Space- Students
profoundly
manipulate space,
revealing an acute
awareness of spatial
relationships and
interpret open spaces,
closed spaces and
semi-open spaces
Profound
manipulation of
space; evident
awareness of spatial
relationships
Skillful manipulation
of space; clear
awareness of spatial
relationships
Adequate
manipulation of
space; satisfactory
awareness of spatial
relationships
Limited manipulation
of space; partial
awareness of spatial
relationships
0-5
Total Marks 17-20 13-16 09-12 08-05 0-20
CA
Assignment
Description
Evaluation
Parameter
5 (Excellent) 4 (Very Good) 3 (Good)
2 (Fair & Needs
improvement)
Range
3. CA-03
Explore the concept
of additive
transformation in
architecture by
creating a 3D model
using L-C-J forms
from sheet materials,
arranging them in
horizontal and vertical
planes, and using
them to develop a 3D
space that reflects
your understanding of
spatial transformation
and circulation.
Additionally, translate
the model into
architectural
drawings, focusing on
precision,
presentation, and the
communication
Presentation-
Students deliver clear
and engaging oral
presentations,
effectively conveying
their design concepts
and thought process.
Clear and engaging
oral presentation;
confident explanation
of design concepts
Mostly clear oral
presentation;
competent
explanation of design
concepts
Adequate oral
presentation;
satisfactory
explanation of design
concepts
Limited oral
presentation; unclear
explanation of design
concepts
0-5
Drawing and
Documentation-
Students produce
highly detailed and
accurate architectural
drawings, showcasing
their ability to present
their design concepts
effectively.
Highly detailed and
accurate architectural
drawings; exemplary
presentation quality
Detailed and accurate
architectural
drawings; strong
presentation quality
Adequate
architectural
drawings; satisfactory
presentation quality
Limited architectural
drawings; fair
presentation quality
0-5
Understanding-
Students demonstrate
a profound grasp of
the additive
transformation
technique and a clear
understanding of how
space transformation
and circulation are
achieved.
Profound grasp of
additive
transformation
technique; clear
understanding of
space transformation
and circulation
Strong understanding
of additive
transformation
technique; good
comprehension of
space transformation
and circulation
Adequate grasp of
additive
transformation
technique; satisfactory
comprehension of
space transformation
and circulation
Limited
understanding of
additive
transformation
technique; partial
comprehension of
space transformation
and circulation
0-5
Creativity- Students
exhibit highly creative
interpretations of the
design, showcasing
innovative and
resourceful use of the
given L-C-J forms.
Highly creative
interpretation of
design; innovative use
of L-C-J forms
Creative interpretation
of design; resourceful
use of L-C-J forms
Moderately creative
interpretation of
design; effective use
of L-C-J forms
Limited creative
interpretation of
design; basic use of
L-C-J forms
0-5
Total Marks 17-20 13-16 09-12 08-05 0-20
CA
Assignment
Description
Evaluation
Parameter
5 (Excellent) 4 (Very Good) 3 (Good)
2 (Fair & Needs
improvement)
Range
CA-04
Delve into the concept
of space generation
and circulation by
creating a 3D model
using the subtractive
transformation
technique. Using
green foam blocks,
explore the process of
carving out spaces
from a solid mass to
Space Generation-
Students offer a
profound analysis of
hidden and types of
spaces, showcasing
their ability to identify
and describe spatial
qualities effectively.
Profound analysis of
hidden and types of
spaces; clear
identification of
different spatial
qualities
Comprehensive
analysis of hidden and
types of spaces; good
identification of
spatial qualities
Adequate analysis of
hidden and types of
spaces; satisfactory
identification of
spatial qualities
Limited analysis of
hidden and types of
spaces; partial
identification of
spatial qualities
0-5
4. CA-04
Delve into the concept
of space generation
and circulation by
creating a 3D model
using the subtractive
transformation
technique. Using
green foam blocks,
explore the process of
carving out spaces
from a solid mass to
understand how
spatial qualities and
circulation paths are
developed. This
hands-on exercise
aims to enhance
spatial relationships,
hidden spaces, and
path-space
interactions in
architectural design.
Analysis of Space
Connectivity-
Students exhibit an
exceptional
understanding of
space connectivity,
highlighting their skill
in establishing
meaningful spatial
relationships
Exceptional
understanding of
space connectivity;
well-developed spatial
relationships
Strong understanding
of space connectivity;
effective spatial
relationships
Adequate
understanding of
space connectivity;
satisfactory spatial
relationships
Limited
understanding of
space connectivity;
partial spatial
relationships
0-5
Evaluation of Path-
Space Relationship-
Students skillfully
integrate paths and
spaces, demonstrating
their clear
comprehension of
how these elements
interact to shape the
user experience.
Skillful integration of
paths and spaces;
clear comprehension
of their interaction
Competent integration
of paths and spaces;
good comprehension
of their interaction
Adequate integration
of paths and spaces;
satisfactory
comprehension of
their interaction
Limited integration of
paths and spaces;
partial comprehension
of their interaction
0-5
Creativity and
Presentation-
Students display
highly creative
interpretations of
design through
innovative use of the
subtractive
transformation
technique, effectively
communicated
through their
presentation.
Highly creative
interpretation of
design; innovative use
of subtractive
transformation
technique
Creative interpretation
of design; resourceful
use of subtractive
transformation
technique
Moderately creative
interpretation of
design; effective use
of subtractive
transformation
technique
Limited creative
interpretation of
design; basic use of
subtractive
transformation
technique
0-5
Total Marks 17-20 13-16 09-12 08-05 0-20
CA
Assignment
Description
Evaluation
Parameter
5 (Excellent) 4 (Very Good) 3 (Good)
2 (Fair & Needs
improvement)
Range
CA-05
Students will have the
opportunity to apply
their knowledge of
anthropometry,
fundamentals of
design, and principles
of architecture to
create a design
proposal for a
Students Plaza
within the university
campus. This hands-
on exercise aims to
enhance your design
Study of
Anthropometry-
Students exhibit a
thorough
understanding of
anthropometric
principles, effectively
integrating these
principles to design
spaces that cater to
human dimensions
and comfort.
Thorough
understanding of
anthropometric
principles; accurate
application in design
Good understanding
of anthropometric
principles; effective
application in design
Adequate
understanding of
anthropometric
principles;
satisfactory
application in design
Limited
understanding of
anthropometric
principles; partial
application in design
0-5
5. CA-05
Students will have the
opportunity to apply
their knowledge of
anthropometry,
fundamentals of
design, and principles
of architecture to
create a design
proposal for a
Students Plaza
within the university
campus. This hands-
on exercise aims to
enhance your design
thinking, site analysis,
concept development,
and presentation skills
by addressing real-
world architectural
challenges
Site Analysis-
Students demonstrate
comprehensive site
analysis skills,
identifying key site
features that inform
their design solutions.
Comprehensive site
analysis; keen
identification of key
site features
Detailed site analysis;
clear identification of
key site features
Adequate site
analysis; satisfactory
identification of key
site features
Limited site analysis;
partial identification
of key site features
0-5
Concept
Development-
Students display
profound concept
development skills,
deriving innovative
design solutions from
their understanding of
architectural
principles.
Profound concept
development;
innovative design
solutions derived
from principles of
architecture
Strong concept
development; creative
design solutions
derived from
principles of
architecture
Adequate concept
development;
satisfactory design
solutions derived
from principles of
architecture
Limited concept
development; partial
design solutions
derived from
principles of
architecture
0-5
Presentation-
Students effectively
communicate their
design intent through
exceptional
presentation quality,
enhancing the visual
and verbal
communication of
their ideas.
Exceptional
presentation quality;
clear communication
of design intent
Strong presentation
quality; effective
communication of
design intent
Adequate presentation
quality; satisfactory
communication of
design intent
Limited presentation
quality; partial
communication of
design intent
0-5
Total Marks 17-20 13-16 09-12 08-05 0-20
CA
Assignment
Description
Evaluation
Parameter
5 (Excellent) 4 (Very Good) 3 (Good)
2 (Fair & Needs
improvement)
Range
CA-06
Building upon the
foundation established
in the first phase of
the assignment, this
second phase provides
you with the
opportunity to further
develop and refine
your Students Plaza
design. Drawing on
your understanding of
anthropometry,
architectural
principles, and design
fundamentals,
students will evolve
their initial design
proposal into a
comprehensive
solution that
Form Evolution &
Anthropometry-
Students demonstrate
highly evolved form
development while
seamlessly integrating
anthropometric
principles to enhance
user experience and
design aesthetics.
Highly evolved form
development;
innovative design
integrating
anthropometric
principles
Well-evolved form
development; creative
design integrating
anthropometric
principles
Adequate form
development;
satisfactory design
integrating
anthropometric
principles
Limited form
development; basic
design with partial
anthropometric
integration
0-5
Functionality &
Aesthetics- Students
create a design that
effectively balances
functionality and
aesthetics, resulting in
a plaza that meets
user needs while
being visually
appealing.
Exceptionally
functional and
aesthetically pleasing
design; effective
integration of user
needs and visual
expression
Highly functional and
aesthetically pleasing
design; effective
integration of user
needs and visual
expression
Moderately functional
and aesthetically
pleasing design;
satisfactory
integration of user
needs and visual
expression
Partially functional
and aesthetically
pleasing design;
limited integration of
user needs and visual
expression
0-5
6. CA-06
opportunity to further
develop and refine
your Students Plaza
design. Drawing on
your understanding of
anthropometry,
architectural
principles, and design
fundamentals,
students will evolve
their initial design
proposal into a
comprehensive
solution that
harmoniously
integrates form,
functionality,
aesthetics, and spatial
exploration.
Spatial Exploration
& Creativity-
Students engage in
skilful spatial
exploration and
innovative design
solutions, showcasing
their creativity in
designing unique
spatial configurations.
Profound spatial
exploration with
innovative spatial
configurations;
creative design
solutions
Skillful spatial
exploration with
creative spatial
configurations;
imaginative design
solutions
Adequate spatial
exploration with
satisfactory spatial
configurations;
acceptable design
solutions
Limited spatial
exploration with basic
spatial configurations;
weak design solutions
0-5
Presentation-
Students present their
design evolution with
exceptional quality,
effectively
communicating how
the design has
evolved based on user
needs, aesthetics, and
spatial considerations.
Exceptional
presentation quality;
clear communication
of design evolution
Strong presentation
quality; effective
communication of
design evolution
Adequate presentation
quality; satisfactory
communication of
design evolution
Limited presentation
quality; partial
communication of
design evolution
0-5
Total Marks 17-20 13-16 09-12 08-05 0-20
CA
Assignment
Description
Evaluation
Parameter
5 (Excellent) 4 (Very Good) 3 (Good)
2 (Fair & Needs
improvement)
Range
CA-07
Students will create a
Design Sheet that
details the evolution
of their Student-Plaza
design, from inception
to the refined solution
and includes a
physical model to
bring your vision to
life. This assignment
emphasizes your
ability to
communicate your
design process,
artistic skills, and
presentation
proficiency.
Composition-
Students showcase
highly effective
composition skills,
presenting their
project documentation
with a clear and
logical flow that
guides the viewer
through the project's
progression.
Highly effective
composition; clear
organization of
content with a logical
flow
Strong composition;
well-organized
content with a
coherent progression
Adequate
composition;
satisfactory
organization of
content with some
coherence
Fair composition;
content organization
lacks clarity and
coherence
0-5
Line Weight & Line
Types- Students
skillfully use line
weight and types to
establish hierarchy
and clarity in their
drawings,
contributing to the
overall legibility of
the project
documentation.
Skillful use of line
weight and types;
effectively conveys
hierarchy and clarity
Competent use of line
weight and types;
establishes hierarchy
and clarity
Adequate use of line
weight and types;
somewhat establishes
hierarchy and clarity
Limited use of line
weight and types;
unclear hierarchy and
lack of clarity
0-5
7. CA-07
to the refined solution
and includes a
physical model to
bring your vision to
life. This assignment
emphasizes your
ability to
communicate your
design process,
artistic skills, and
presentation
proficiency.
Rendering- Students
achieve outstanding
rendering quality,
effectively using
shading and textures
to enhance the visual
representation of their
design concepts.
Outstanding rendering
quality; skillful use of
shading and textures
Strong rendering
quality; effective use
of shading and
textures
Adequate rendering
quality; satisfactory
use of shading and
textures
Limited rendering
quality; basic shading
and textures
0-5
Presentation-
Students excel in
presentation quality,
effectively
communicating the
evolution of their
project through
detailed annotations
and clear
communication.
Exceptional
presentation quality;
clear communication
of project evolution
with detailed
annotations
Strong presentation
quality; effectively
communicates project
evolution with
annotations
Adequate presentation
quality; satisfactorily
communicates project
evolution with basic
annotations
Limited presentation
quality; unclear
communication of
project evolution with
minimal annotations
0-5
Total Marks 17-20 13-16 09-12 08-05 0-20