Ben was indicted on drug charges in September 2019 and remained in jail as his trial was delayed multiple times by his attorney. In March 2020, as Ben's motion to dismiss the charges for violation of his right to a speedy trial was pending, all courts closed due to COVID-19 and his hearing was postponed, leaving Ben in continued pretrial detention. Based on research of the Federal Speedy Trial Act and relevant New York state law, as well as consideration of a related appellate court case, Ben's Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial may have been violated by the delays and postponement due to the pandemic.
American Government P5IP instructionsThe instructor has returned.docxgalerussel59292
American Government P5IP instructions
The instructor has returned your Week 4 Individual Project Key Assignment with comments and suggestions on how to improve your overall draft.
[Instructors’ Comments: Overview of selected Constitutional Amendment (38/38). Demonstrates a clear understanding of the need being addressed. The types of crimes to be addressed by the proposed policy (10/15): Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. Specific constitutional rights to be upheld (12/22): Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. The rationale for the proposed policy (12/23): Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. How should the proposed policy be evaluated (11/30). Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. Mechanics (15/15). Document organization (7/7). Demonstrates a clear understanding of the document organization. You did a very good job in discussing your chosen amendments and the purpose of each amendment. In addition, you accurately discussed who each amendment affects and why each amendment is important, and how each amendment. You did not complete the second part of the assignment, in which you were to discuss what type of policy you believe would need to be implemented for police investigators when interrogating a suspect. However, you did not provide any discussion regarding this matter. You were to determine what your ideal policy would be. For example, if you believed that the current Miranda policy was sufficient to address issues with police interrogations you would then discuss the type of crimes the policy should pertain (i.e., felony, misdemeanors, or both), the specific constitutional rights that must be upheld under the policy, the rationale for the policy, and discuss how the policy should be evaluated for potential weaknesses or gaps. You are on the right track, just make sure you are responding to every question in a task and if you have any questions seek clarification.]
Assignment Guidelines
1. Revise and amend your Week 4 Key Assignment by adding/changing what your instructor commented on.
2. Address the following, and add your responses to your Key Assignment final draft:
3. Conduct an Internet search for a current foreign policy that deals with the same issue you discussed in your Week 4 Individual Project.
4. What is the name of the country?
a. What is the name of the policy in the other country?
b. What are the specific components of the policy? Explain in detail.
c. How might you evaluate the policy’s overall effectiveness? Explain.
*Must be in APA format with references.
Running head: P4IP
2
P4IP
PBAD200-1204B-01 P4IP
Colorado Technical University
Instructor: Professors Jeter
Connie Hutson
17 December 2012
Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights
The Fourth Amendment is entrenched in English legal doctrine. Sir Edward Coke, in Semayne's.
American Government P5IP instructionsThe instructor has returned.docxgalerussel59292
American Government P5IP instructions
The instructor has returned your Week 4 Individual Project Key Assignment with comments and suggestions on how to improve your overall draft.
[Instructors’ Comments: Overview of selected Constitutional Amendment (38/38). Demonstrates a clear understanding of the need being addressed. The types of crimes to be addressed by the proposed policy (10/15): Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. Specific constitutional rights to be upheld (12/22): Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. The rationale for the proposed policy (12/23): Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. How should the proposed policy be evaluated (11/30). Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information. Mechanics (15/15). Document organization (7/7). Demonstrates a clear understanding of the document organization. You did a very good job in discussing your chosen amendments and the purpose of each amendment. In addition, you accurately discussed who each amendment affects and why each amendment is important, and how each amendment. You did not complete the second part of the assignment, in which you were to discuss what type of policy you believe would need to be implemented for police investigators when interrogating a suspect. However, you did not provide any discussion regarding this matter. You were to determine what your ideal policy would be. For example, if you believed that the current Miranda policy was sufficient to address issues with police interrogations you would then discuss the type of crimes the policy should pertain (i.e., felony, misdemeanors, or both), the specific constitutional rights that must be upheld under the policy, the rationale for the policy, and discuss how the policy should be evaluated for potential weaknesses or gaps. You are on the right track, just make sure you are responding to every question in a task and if you have any questions seek clarification.]
Assignment Guidelines
1. Revise and amend your Week 4 Key Assignment by adding/changing what your instructor commented on.
2. Address the following, and add your responses to your Key Assignment final draft:
3. Conduct an Internet search for a current foreign policy that deals with the same issue you discussed in your Week 4 Individual Project.
4. What is the name of the country?
a. What is the name of the policy in the other country?
b. What are the specific components of the policy? Explain in detail.
c. How might you evaluate the policy’s overall effectiveness? Explain.
*Must be in APA format with references.
Running head: P4IP
2
P4IP
PBAD200-1204B-01 P4IP
Colorado Technical University
Instructor: Professors Jeter
Connie Hutson
17 December 2012
Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights
The Fourth Amendment is entrenched in English legal doctrine. Sir Edward Coke, in Semayne's.
Defendant’s Rights
Name
School
Class
Date
Pretrial
A proceeding held by a judge, arbitrator, etc., before a trial to simplify the issues of law and fact and stipulate certain matters between the parties, in order to expedite justice and curtail costs at the trial.
access.org
The pre-trial process starts when a pre-trial judge gives his/her confirmation about an indictment. The indictment can remain sealed after being confirmed to make sure of the participation of the defendant at trial. Take note that the pre-trial judge has power to issue arrest warrants and summonses to appear. Many citizens usually think that the real action in criminal courts takes place during trials. However, they are wrong in this assessment. Over 90% of the criminal cases are usually disposed by the guilty pleas and not trials. Most of these guilty pleas are outcomes of agreements made between defense attorneys and prosecutors.
*
Speedy Trial
The Sixth Amendment of the United States constitution guarantees those accused of a criminal offense a speedy trial.
Coindesk.com
According to the amendment, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury . and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.”Speedy trial is mostly reached through an impartial jury. This implies that the defendant must appear for a trial for his/her alleged offenses within a reasonably shorter period of time after his/her arrest. Similarly, before the defendant is convicted of many crimes, he/she has a constitutional right being tried by a jury where he must be found guilty before the actual trial. Although most states in the United states have laws which are set where trial must be conducted after the charges are filed, the issue of knowing whether the trial is speedy under Sixth Amendment or not comes down according to the circumstances.
*
Speedy Trial Cont..
As the offender is entitled to a speedy trial. The victim and the victim's family should be entitled to see a speedy administration of justice. Waiting 10 years to see justice is further offensive to the family.
By: John Ross
QUOTEHD.COM
Impartial Judge The judge have power in both common and civil law criminal justice systems.
The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to trial by unbiased and impartial judge.In the legal system of the United States, judicial impartiality is a basic concept component for justice.
The criminal justice system gives judges a lot of power in both common law and civil law. This power is however disproportionally large as compared to both the prosecutor and criminal defense lawyer. The U.S. constitution guarantees the right to trial by unbiased and impartial judge. ...
7 Juvenile Justice Procedures
Chapter Learning Objectives
On completion of this chapter, students should be able to do the following:
Understand and discuss juvenile court procedures
Discuss the rights of juveniles at various stages, from taking into custody through appeals
Understand requirements for bail, notification, and filing of petitions
Discuss procedures involved in detaining juveniles
What Would You Do?
It is Friday night and you are in bed. Your 13-year-old daughter is spending the night with a friend. The two girls told you they were going to a movie and back to
her friend’s home. Her friend’s older sister, who is 18, is going to drive them to and from the movie. At approximately 2:15 a.m. you get a phone call. The caller
identifies herself as Lisa Strom, an employee of the Forten County Detention Center. She says that your daughter has been taken into custody for curfew violation,
possession of alcohol by a minor, peace disturbance, and assaulting a police officer. Ms. Strom informs you that your daughter will be held in detention pending a
review of her case by a juvenile intake officer. This review will take place within the next 24 hours and you will receive another phone call once the juvenile intake
officer decides to hold or release the child. She states that you are allowed to visit your daughter once within the next 24 hours and informs you that visitation is
allowed between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. that day. The only question you can think to ask is if your daughter is okay. Ms. Strom says your daughter is going through
the intake process and is in good health. You hang up the phone wide awake and wondering what to do next.
What Would You Do?
1. Would your daughter be classified as a status offender or a delinquent, according to the charges?
2. What would be your next course of action? Would you contact a lawyer, wait for the phone call from the juvenile intake officer, visit your daughter during
visiting hours, or do something else?
3. If you were the juvenile intake officer, would you continue to detain this child or release her to her parents pending court?
Juvenile court acts discuss not only the purposes and scope of the juvenile justice system but also the procedure the juvenile courts are to
follow. Proceedings concerning juveniles officially begin with the filing of a petition alleging that a juvenile is delinquent, dependent,
neglected, abused, in need of supervision, or in need of authoritative intervention. Most juvenile court acts, however, also discuss the unofficial
or diversionary activities available as remedies prior to the filing of a petition such as a stationhouse adjustment and a preliminary
conference. A stationhouse adjustment occurs when a police officer negotiates a settlement with a juvenile, often with his or her parents,
without taking further official action (a full discussion of stationhouse adjustments follows in Chapter 8). A preliminary conference is a
voluntary meeting arranged by .
1Figures title5Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court.docxdrennanmicah
1
Figures title: 5 Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court
Carpenter V. United States
In what was a big criminal case in Detroit, several suspects cell phone locations were tracked to prove a drug rings activity. This was going on for several months with no warrant granted with probable cause. Carpenter and his legal team argued after his conviction and in the appeals court that this very action violated his fourth amendment right and should vacate his conviction. This appeal set up a long and important fight that took our courts into a crossroads with regards to digital right being a part of the fourth amendment.
The Original Case and Information Seizure
Carpenter was convicted back in 2013 for a string of burglaries in the Detroit area. The FBI obtained his locations through a seizure of his stored location data for past months. Almost 13,000 data points were obtained by the agency. These data points showed everything about his life in the timeframe received. Agents were able to tell when and where he slept, went to church and much more. According to Chief Justice John Roberts, “when the Government tracks the location of a cell phone it achieves near perfect surveillance, as if it had attached an ankle monitor to the phone’s user.” (Wessler, 2018). The only problem being this perfect surveillance was done without any warrants. This set up the argument that all of this was done against his fourth amendment right.
The Fourth Amendment Right
The fourth amendment states that we all have ”The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” ("America’s Founding Documents", n.d.). At the time this was written there were no such things as cell phones, but our court system was tasked throughout this case to properly interpret its meaning regarding our security and privacy with cell phone use and data. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Carpenter in “Fourth Amendment must apply to records of such unprecedented breadth and sensitivity” ("America's Founding Documents", n.d.). By viewing someone’s mapped out timestamped locations we get to see very intimately where a person is going and quite possibly what they are doing, and when there are doing it. Not that we have things to hide for some of us, but I still think we are entitled to that level of privacy.
FBI Claims no Right Infringement
The Governments lawyers argues that when we share our information with a “third party” in this case the cellphone company that we forfeit our Fourth Amendment right for that information when doing so. That would mean that phone call information, text messages, and even our GPS data would no longer be our information to protect as it is shared with the cellphone company and that we.
An Overview of Procedural Rights in White Collar Criminal ProsecutionsJeffrey Ahonen
This presentation is targeted primarily to paralegals, legal assistants, and legal secretaries, and provides an overview of a defendant's federal constitutional rights in a white collar criminal prosecution. It was created for a webinar conducted on February 10, 2011, under the sponsorship of the American Alliance of Paralegals, Inc., a nonprofit organization for professional paralegals.
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docxbartholomeocoombs
Chapter 13: Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other Police Practices 471
# 151053 Cust: Cengage Au: Hall Pg. No. 471
Title: Criminal Law and Procedure Server: __________________
K
Short / Normal
DESIGN SERVICES OF
S4-CARLISLE
Publishing Services
confessions, and admissions to prove guilt is controversial. The United States Supreme
Court has recognized that admissions are highly suspect when relied upon alone to
obtain a confession. The Court stated, in Escobedo v. Illinois (1964),4 that a “system
of criminal law enforcement which comes to depend on the ‘confession’ will, in the
long run, be less reliable and more subject to abuses than a system which depends on
extrinsic evidence independently” obtained through other law enforcement practices.
At common law, confessions and admissions could be used freely, as long as they
were made voluntarily. The early basis for excluding involuntary confessions was the
Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.5 Eventually, federal
defendants could seek to have confessions suppressed if they were not taken before a mag-
istrate promptly after arrest. This was known as the McNabb-Mallory rule, named for
two Supreme Court cases.6 The rule was not constitutionally based. Instead, the Court
announced the rule in its supervisory role over the nation’s federal courts. While the rule
of quick presentment of arrestees to judges had existed at common law and had been
codified by Congress, there was no remedy for violations. Accordingly, the Court held
that confessions that occurred after unreasonable delays should be excluded. Congress re-
acted to McNabb-Mallory and Miranda by enacting a statute that permits the admission
of a confession so long as it was voluntarily given. Another section provides that regardless
of any delay in presenting a suspect to a judge, a confession shall be admitted if obtained
within 6 hours of arrest. In Corley v. United States, 556 U.S.—(2009) it was held that if
there is a delay in presenting a suspect to a judge longer than 6 hours, the old McNabb-
Mallory exclusionary rule applies if a delay is found to be unreasonable.
Today, interrogations, confessions, and admissions are governed by these rules, as
well as two broader rights: the Fifth Amendment right to be free from self-incrimina-
tion and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
Miranda
By virtue of popular television and films, the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona,
or at least the “Miranda” warnings that are a product of that case, is one of the best
known judicial decisions of our time.
[The Supreme Court consolidated appeals from
several individuals who had been convicted at trials
where their confessions were entered into evidence.
Ernesto Miranda, for whom the case is named,
was arrested for rape and kidnapping. He was
interrogated at a police station. He was not advised
of his constitutional rights, he never requested to
see .
Defendant’s Rights
Name
School
Class
Date
Pretrial
A proceeding held by a judge, arbitrator, etc., before a trial to simplify the issues of law and fact and stipulate certain matters between the parties, in order to expedite justice and curtail costs at the trial.
access.org
The pre-trial process starts when a pre-trial judge gives his/her confirmation about an indictment. The indictment can remain sealed after being confirmed to make sure of the participation of the defendant at trial. Take note that the pre-trial judge has power to issue arrest warrants and summonses to appear. Many citizens usually think that the real action in criminal courts takes place during trials. However, they are wrong in this assessment. Over 90% of the criminal cases are usually disposed by the guilty pleas and not trials. Most of these guilty pleas are outcomes of agreements made between defense attorneys and prosecutors.
*
Speedy Trial
The Sixth Amendment of the United States constitution guarantees those accused of a criminal offense a speedy trial.
Coindesk.com
According to the amendment, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury . and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.”Speedy trial is mostly reached through an impartial jury. This implies that the defendant must appear for a trial for his/her alleged offenses within a reasonably shorter period of time after his/her arrest. Similarly, before the defendant is convicted of many crimes, he/she has a constitutional right being tried by a jury where he must be found guilty before the actual trial. Although most states in the United states have laws which are set where trial must be conducted after the charges are filed, the issue of knowing whether the trial is speedy under Sixth Amendment or not comes down according to the circumstances.
*
Speedy Trial Cont..
As the offender is entitled to a speedy trial. The victim and the victim's family should be entitled to see a speedy administration of justice. Waiting 10 years to see justice is further offensive to the family.
By: John Ross
QUOTEHD.COM
Impartial Judge The judge have power in both common and civil law criminal justice systems.
The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to trial by unbiased and impartial judge.In the legal system of the United States, judicial impartiality is a basic concept component for justice.
The criminal justice system gives judges a lot of power in both common law and civil law. This power is however disproportionally large as compared to both the prosecutor and criminal defense lawyer. The U.S. constitution guarantees the right to trial by unbiased and impartial judge. ...
7 Juvenile Justice Procedures
Chapter Learning Objectives
On completion of this chapter, students should be able to do the following:
Understand and discuss juvenile court procedures
Discuss the rights of juveniles at various stages, from taking into custody through appeals
Understand requirements for bail, notification, and filing of petitions
Discuss procedures involved in detaining juveniles
What Would You Do?
It is Friday night and you are in bed. Your 13-year-old daughter is spending the night with a friend. The two girls told you they were going to a movie and back to
her friend’s home. Her friend’s older sister, who is 18, is going to drive them to and from the movie. At approximately 2:15 a.m. you get a phone call. The caller
identifies herself as Lisa Strom, an employee of the Forten County Detention Center. She says that your daughter has been taken into custody for curfew violation,
possession of alcohol by a minor, peace disturbance, and assaulting a police officer. Ms. Strom informs you that your daughter will be held in detention pending a
review of her case by a juvenile intake officer. This review will take place within the next 24 hours and you will receive another phone call once the juvenile intake
officer decides to hold or release the child. She states that you are allowed to visit your daughter once within the next 24 hours and informs you that visitation is
allowed between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. that day. The only question you can think to ask is if your daughter is okay. Ms. Strom says your daughter is going through
the intake process and is in good health. You hang up the phone wide awake and wondering what to do next.
What Would You Do?
1. Would your daughter be classified as a status offender or a delinquent, according to the charges?
2. What would be your next course of action? Would you contact a lawyer, wait for the phone call from the juvenile intake officer, visit your daughter during
visiting hours, or do something else?
3. If you were the juvenile intake officer, would you continue to detain this child or release her to her parents pending court?
Juvenile court acts discuss not only the purposes and scope of the juvenile justice system but also the procedure the juvenile courts are to
follow. Proceedings concerning juveniles officially begin with the filing of a petition alleging that a juvenile is delinquent, dependent,
neglected, abused, in need of supervision, or in need of authoritative intervention. Most juvenile court acts, however, also discuss the unofficial
or diversionary activities available as remedies prior to the filing of a petition such as a stationhouse adjustment and a preliminary
conference. A stationhouse adjustment occurs when a police officer negotiates a settlement with a juvenile, often with his or her parents,
without taking further official action (a full discussion of stationhouse adjustments follows in Chapter 8). A preliminary conference is a
voluntary meeting arranged by .
1Figures title5Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court.docxdrennanmicah
1
Figures title: 5 Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court
Carpenter V. United States
In what was a big criminal case in Detroit, several suspects cell phone locations were tracked to prove a drug rings activity. This was going on for several months with no warrant granted with probable cause. Carpenter and his legal team argued after his conviction and in the appeals court that this very action violated his fourth amendment right and should vacate his conviction. This appeal set up a long and important fight that took our courts into a crossroads with regards to digital right being a part of the fourth amendment.
The Original Case and Information Seizure
Carpenter was convicted back in 2013 for a string of burglaries in the Detroit area. The FBI obtained his locations through a seizure of his stored location data for past months. Almost 13,000 data points were obtained by the agency. These data points showed everything about his life in the timeframe received. Agents were able to tell when and where he slept, went to church and much more. According to Chief Justice John Roberts, “when the Government tracks the location of a cell phone it achieves near perfect surveillance, as if it had attached an ankle monitor to the phone’s user.” (Wessler, 2018). The only problem being this perfect surveillance was done without any warrants. This set up the argument that all of this was done against his fourth amendment right.
The Fourth Amendment Right
The fourth amendment states that we all have ”The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” ("America’s Founding Documents", n.d.). At the time this was written there were no such things as cell phones, but our court system was tasked throughout this case to properly interpret its meaning regarding our security and privacy with cell phone use and data. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Carpenter in “Fourth Amendment must apply to records of such unprecedented breadth and sensitivity” ("America's Founding Documents", n.d.). By viewing someone’s mapped out timestamped locations we get to see very intimately where a person is going and quite possibly what they are doing, and when there are doing it. Not that we have things to hide for some of us, but I still think we are entitled to that level of privacy.
FBI Claims no Right Infringement
The Governments lawyers argues that when we share our information with a “third party” in this case the cellphone company that we forfeit our Fourth Amendment right for that information when doing so. That would mean that phone call information, text messages, and even our GPS data would no longer be our information to protect as it is shared with the cellphone company and that we.
An Overview of Procedural Rights in White Collar Criminal ProsecutionsJeffrey Ahonen
This presentation is targeted primarily to paralegals, legal assistants, and legal secretaries, and provides an overview of a defendant's federal constitutional rights in a white collar criminal prosecution. It was created for a webinar conducted on February 10, 2011, under the sponsorship of the American Alliance of Paralegals, Inc., a nonprofit organization for professional paralegals.
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docxbartholomeocoombs
Chapter 13: Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other Police Practices 471
# 151053 Cust: Cengage Au: Hall Pg. No. 471
Title: Criminal Law and Procedure Server: __________________
K
Short / Normal
DESIGN SERVICES OF
S4-CARLISLE
Publishing Services
confessions, and admissions to prove guilt is controversial. The United States Supreme
Court has recognized that admissions are highly suspect when relied upon alone to
obtain a confession. The Court stated, in Escobedo v. Illinois (1964),4 that a “system
of criminal law enforcement which comes to depend on the ‘confession’ will, in the
long run, be less reliable and more subject to abuses than a system which depends on
extrinsic evidence independently” obtained through other law enforcement practices.
At common law, confessions and admissions could be used freely, as long as they
were made voluntarily. The early basis for excluding involuntary confessions was the
Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.5 Eventually, federal
defendants could seek to have confessions suppressed if they were not taken before a mag-
istrate promptly after arrest. This was known as the McNabb-Mallory rule, named for
two Supreme Court cases.6 The rule was not constitutionally based. Instead, the Court
announced the rule in its supervisory role over the nation’s federal courts. While the rule
of quick presentment of arrestees to judges had existed at common law and had been
codified by Congress, there was no remedy for violations. Accordingly, the Court held
that confessions that occurred after unreasonable delays should be excluded. Congress re-
acted to McNabb-Mallory and Miranda by enacting a statute that permits the admission
of a confession so long as it was voluntarily given. Another section provides that regardless
of any delay in presenting a suspect to a judge, a confession shall be admitted if obtained
within 6 hours of arrest. In Corley v. United States, 556 U.S.—(2009) it was held that if
there is a delay in presenting a suspect to a judge longer than 6 hours, the old McNabb-
Mallory exclusionary rule applies if a delay is found to be unreasonable.
Today, interrogations, confessions, and admissions are governed by these rules, as
well as two broader rights: the Fifth Amendment right to be free from self-incrimina-
tion and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
Miranda
By virtue of popular television and films, the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona,
or at least the “Miranda” warnings that are a product of that case, is one of the best
known judicial decisions of our time.
[The Supreme Court consolidated appeals from
several individuals who had been convicted at trials
where their confessions were entered into evidence.
Ernesto Miranda, for whom the case is named,
was arrested for rape and kidnapping. He was
interrogated at a police station. He was not advised
of his constitutional rights, he never requested to
see .
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
1. Application of the Sixth Amendment and COVID-19
The LawThe Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads, In all criminal prosecutions,
the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the
State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have
been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the
accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process
for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense
(1).The Speedy Trial Act of 1974 and state laws provide guidance as to the number of days
to bring a defendant to trial before this right is violated. A prosecutor may work around the
speedy trial clock if they can show good cause for a delay, or if a defendant agrees to waive
the right. One reason for the right to a speedy trial is to prevent a defendant from being held
in custody only to find out that the defendant was innocent. An innocent citizen who is
incarcerated in violation of the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial is a violation of due
process rights (2).The FactsBen was indicted on 24 state counts of possession of fentanyl,
with intent to distribute near an elementary school, and federal racketeering charges in
September 2019. While Ben sat in jail, his attorney was able to delay his jury trial a few
times so he could gather witnesses for Bens defense. In March 2020, Bens attorney
submitted a motion to dismiss the charges for a violation of Bens Sixth Amendment right to
a speedy trial. The hearing was set for March 28. On March 15, the Governor of the state
ordered all courts to close and suspended jury trials due to public safety concerns over
COVID-19. Ben did not get his hearing and remained in jail.InstructionsResearch the Federal
Speedy Trial Act and its requirements.Research the law in New York State pertaining to the
number of days a defendant may be held in jail, consistent with the requirements of the
Sixth Amendment, for a felony and misdemeanor charge.Read .Write a one-page, double-
spaced explanation using Times New Roman font (size 12), with 1-inch margins on all sides
of whether Bens Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial was violated, based on your
understanding of the law and the 9th Circuit Appellate Court case, United States v. Olsen.
