Antihistamines

Antihistamines
Allergy medications (antihistamine) are used a lot and by medical professionals and parents alike. Because these medications can be taken without
prescriptions and also can found in nearly every house, but one thing that is unknown is that those medications can be toxic and can lead to severe side
effects or even lead to death.
Drugs can become poison to the body if taken more than the recommended amount, drug toxicity can be known by the symptoms that occurs on the
patient and the level of the drug in the patient blood or urine checked in the hospital).
Antihistamines are a group of drugs often used to treat allergy related conditions. Those medications does not cure the conditions but it reliefs the
allergy symptoms. They are used to treat...show more content...
Overdose of antihistamines are rarely fatal but there are symptoms occurs to the person:
fatigue
awkwardness
Blurry vision
Seizures
Tremors
Muscle spasms
Ringing in the ears
Mouth dryness and many other symptoms.
пѓ Mechanism of antihistamine toxicity:
H1 blocker antihistamines are structurally related to histamine and antagonize the effects of histamine on H1 receptor sites. They have anticholinergic
effects they may also stimulate or depress the CNS, and some agents (eg, diphenhydramine) have local anesthetic and membrane–depressant effects in
large doses.
Antihistamine toxicity can be detected by the occurred symptoms in the person also by the level of drug in the person urine or blood which are
checked in the hospital.
пѓ Complications of toxicity:

There are complication of using antihistamine for a short time and for a long time, short time usage has mild symptoms like:
Light–headedness
Loss of coordination
Dry nose, throat, and mouth
Blurred vision
But the long term use has moderate side effects
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Anthony Giddens: A Sociological Study
By the definition, science is the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and
natural world through observation and experiment (Oxford dictionary). This crude definition is elaborated further by a world–famous sociologist
Anthony Giddens as 'the scientific study of human social life, groups, and societies. It is dazzling and compelling enterprise, as its subject matter is
our own behavior as social beings. The scope of sociological study is extremely wide, ranging from the analysis of passing encounters between
individuals on the street to the investigation of global social processes such as the rise of Islamic fundamentalism.' (Giddens: 2006)
Before the rise in...show more content...
He believed that all scientific methods share a common logical method aimed to reveal universal laws. Therefore Comte believed that sociology should
apply the same strict scientific methods to the study of society that physics or chemistry use to study the physical world. He called all sciences the
"law of the three stages" which claims that world has passed through three stages: theological (guided by religious ideas and the belief that society was
an expression of God's will), metaphysical (this stage is modification of the first one, from supernatural to natural. The beginning of a world that
questioned religion and authority.), and positive (the final stage compared to earlier stages is truly scientific, and what is now understood while we
peak of an explanation of facts is simply the establishment of a connection between single phenomena and some general facts, the number of which
continually diminishes with the progress of science.) (Comte 1855: 26)
In a very similar manner to the other social sciences, sociology is rather distinctive from natural sciences. Firstly, it is impossible to collect data on
social facts as opposed to the physical world. Social facts, unlike the natural ones, are not objective. On the contrary, social facts are reproducible as
well as created by humans. Secondly, it is not only human beings

The Design Argument for the Existence of God While theology may take God's existence as absolutely necessary on the basis of authority, faith, or
discovery, many philosophers have thought it possible to demonstrate by reason that there must be a God. The teleological argument, also known as the
argument from design quite simply states that a designer must exist since the universe and living things display elements of design in their order,
consistency, unity and pattern. The argument says that things in the world move towards goals, just as the arrow does not move toward its goal except
by the archer's directing it. Consequently there must be an intelligent designer who directs all things to their...show more content...
Many components of nature appear to be very finely tuned for this, and the odds against this happening by chance are astronomical. Criticisms against
these are the principles of self–organisation and evolution which provide complete explanations for apparent design and the odds against all possible
universes are equally astronomical, yet one of them must be the actual universe. b, The idea that God exists and that he is the architect to serve the
purpose that the universe is designed proves subjective. Different observations in the natural world can produce different theories to account for their
existence. Also, the proof is built on analogy, thus if we find there are things in the universe that are disordered, then by analogy, the would imply
there is no designer. Another thing wrong with the argument is that it is not obvious that the universe or living things are intelligently designed.
Science, such as physics and biology, can prove that not everything that has a design is intelligently designed: "There cannot be design without a
designer; contrivance without a contriver ... The marks of design are too strong to be got over. Design must have had a designer. That designer must
have been a person. That person is GOD" (Paley). This seems logical because objects, such as a watch or a computer, have a design and therefore
somebody had to design it.

Essay about Definition of Psychology
Definition of Psychology
The term psychology comes from two Greek words: psyche, which means
1. The spirit or soul. 2. The human mind. 3. In psychoanalysis, the mind functioning as the center of thought, emotion, and behavior.
And logos, "the study of." or according to modern researches "science"
These root words were first combined in the 16th century, at a time when the human soul, spirit, or mind was seen as distinct from the body.
Definition of Psychology:
Psychology is one of the youngest sciences. It is still going through the process of its development. There has been much fierce controversy about its
definition. It has been variously defined as the science of soul,...show more content...
Great psychologist like Sigmand Freud support this fact.
The science of Behavior:
J.B. Watson described Psychology as the science of Behavior.. He said that external action or behavior is the only concern of Psychology. He totally
ignored mental processes. He said that what goes on in our mind eventually comes out as our behavior. But this is not true for all times so this was
considered incomplete.
Now a days the most comprehensive definition of Psychology is:
"Psychology is the scientific study of mind and behavior, and its application to solve human problems"

OR
"Psychology is the schematic study of behavior and mental processes"
This definition contains three elements. The first is that psychology is a scientific enterprise that obtains knowledge through systematic and objective
methods of observation and experimentation. Second is that psychologists study behavior, which refers to any action or reaction that can be measured
or observed–such as the blink of an eye, an increase in heart rate, or the unruly violence that often erupts in a mob. Third is that psychologists study the
mind, which refers to both conscious and unconscious mental states. These states cannot actually be seen, only inferred from

Gwendolen Importance Of Being Earnest Essay
What would a quixotic obsession on a name suggest about the character? In the play the Importance of being earnest, written by Oscar Wilde in the
1895, Gwendolen, the daughter of Augusta Bracknell, becomes fixated to the name Ernest. The play itself focuses on two men, Jack and Algernon,
who have created false identities and eventually get stuck up in their own lies when the truth is revealed. Gwendolen represents her mother in some
approach, as both are strong–minded and sophisticated, thus she evolves a quixotic obsession over the name Earnest
Although Gwendolen is occasionally rebellious towards her mother she shows the quantities of her mother, lady Bracknell; a strong–minded woman. In
the first act Jack questions Algernon about the possibility...show more content...
Most of the time she apprises of her cleverness: "I am always smart! Am I not Mr. Worthing?". Being the first line she said in the play states
something of her representation and it represents immediately that she has a way of acting out overly confident. Additionally she has a demeanor
way of saying things upright: "I know we are going to be great friends Additionally she has a demeanor way of saying things upright, so frequently,
she has to decline her last words. Furthermore she had a presumptuous manner, especially towards whom she opposed, and she often had to decline her
pas dialogue, since she was so straightforward.
Gwendolen was occasionally rebellious towards her mother but still had her quantities even when she did not follow her mother's footsteps. Her first
line,"I am always smart! Am I not Mr. Worthing?", stated that she had a manner of being overly confident and straightforward in her speech. She often
approached those whom she disliked nearly in an arrogant manner apprising the other person of her sophisticated background. In conclusion she had
similar traits of her mother and through the play she has a goal, marrying a man named

The Terms Of A Contract
The terms of a contract refer to the obligations of the parties entering into the contract. These terms are the contents of the contract, which determine the
parties' rights and obligations. Consequently, the law classifies the terms in two ways. Firstly, the law can look at the terms according to the
consequences of breach involving the nature of each term as a condition, warranty or innominate. Secondly, they may investigate the method through
which the terms got into the contract, explicitly or implicitly. Courts have the option to examine these two methods to reach an understanding of the
obligations of each party in the contract breached by one party. In reference to the first method, this essay will focus on the ability of implicit terms
to enter into a contract. An implicit term is not expressly agreed to by the parties, but nevertheless are either read into the contract or arise from other
sources of law. To clarify, parties may not have expressly included the term due to forgetfulness, previous contract with the party or because it may
have been obvious due to the parties presence in the same trade. If the parties do not include a term, the court can imply a term for business efficacy.
This is done in order to make a contract work. Accordingly, the court aims to make valid the intention of the parties. The Moorcock (1889) involved a
term not included, but of such an obvious nature that the parties did not think to include it in the contractual terms. Subsequently,

Louis XIV Essay examples
Louis XIV
After being ruled by a prime minister for so long, France needed some changes. That is exactly what Louis the XIV would bring to France. In an
age of separation, Louis wanted to start a unification process. He started this by giving himself sole power and also only having one religion for the
country. The king is always the center of attention good or bad. Louis was prepared to take the good with the bad, and handled it well. He emphasized
the king as the center of attention. While some see him as egotistical and greedy, Louis was one king who knew how to make improvements.
At four years and eight months, Louis XIV became King. His mother, Anne ofAustria, ruled until he could take the...show more content...
Many think he left France worse off than it started because of the way he left the treasury. It was thought that he spent the money only on himself,
leaving the peasants with no money. It is also said that he spent the money on building his residences (Versailles and Marly) and supporting his
luxurious lifestyle. Another argument brought up is how he was so egotistical. One reason for his being egotistical was the fact that he was
thought of as "God Given" because the court was hoping that Louis XIII would have a child before he died. People talk about how he compared
himself to the sun. As ruler Louis, thought of himself as the sun, which meant he was the center of the kingdom and his subjects rotated around
him. Some see this as incredibly egotistical and thought that made him less of a ruler. One aspect of his being the sun was the fact that his
bedroom was placed in the middle of the castle; he was always center of attention, as the sun would be. The other reason people think he was a
negative influence on France was the fact that as soon as the last Prime minister died, Louis made himself the ruler. He decided to make all the
decisions by himself, with no help. Some think this was a bad idea because he had no previous ruling experience by himself. These same people were
angered when Louis re–established Catholicism, nullifying the Edict of Nantes. Some of the people of

Jesus As the Son of God Essay
Jesus As the Son of God
When Jesus rose from the dead the disciples realized that they needed new ways of describing him to reflect his amazing power and holiness. They
scoured the Hebrew and Jewish scriptures looking for something appropriate to call him by and came up with titles such as "Messiah", "Son of
Man", "Son of David" and "Son of God". In the end Son of God became the most popular of these titles so that is what he became best known as. It is
therefore the subject of my coursework.
What Does It Mean When Christians Talk AboutJesus As Son of God
In the Old Testament, the words "Son of God" often meant someone who had a special relationship with God. However, Mark was also much...show
more content...
Mark certainly brings together the ideas of God the Father, Jesus the Son of God and the Holy Spirit in the story of Jesus' Baptism.
Son of God can be interpreted in three different ways. It can mean the king; in many ancient Mediterranean societies, kings were thought to be
descended from Gods E.g. Pharaohs, Romulus and Remus and Greek heroes. Secondly all Jews were Sons of God because they are "beloved of God".
Finally it can literally mean God's son which means that only Jesus is the Son of God.
Fundamentalists literally believe Jesus is the Son of God and therefore he is God, the second person in the Trinity. They have a literal interpretation of
everything Jesus said in the bible, therefore it affects the way they live their lives. If they believe Jesus is God they will pray to him as God and
worship him as God. Fundamentalists believe that Jesus' teaching is always right and non–negotiable because Jesus' word is God's word and God is
never wrong. On divorce for instance Jesus says: "No human being must separate what God has joined together" (Mark 10:9) The vast majority of
people nowadays believe that divorce is acceptable if the couple are unhappy. Fundamentalists, however, believe that divorce is never acceptable under
any circumstances because Jesus said so and he is always right.
Liberals believe that Jesus is the Son of God by adoption and

The Importance Of College Level Writing
An area of confusion in the college world is what defines college–level writing. There are many possible answers to this question. Students may be
confused about this issue because they want to know what is expected of them in their composition classes and the writing that they have to do in their
other classes. All of us want to succeed when we get to college and writing makes up a big part of the college learning experience since we have to
write in every class we have. Excelling in writing, and especially in writing at the college level, will help students succeed in college because of all of
the writing involved in all of their classes. Before we write our papers however, we need to learn how to write at the college level and before that what
college–level writing is. College–level writing is something that requires more attention to content and quality than high school level writing, something
that has varying expectations between colleges and professors, and something that requires the writer to actively participate in their writing to become
better.
Some students may believe that the work that they did in high school will be similar to the work that they do in college, but, "there is no guarantee
that students who do well in high school composition will automatically do well in college composition" (Davies 31). A student that does excel in their
high school writing classes may think that they know how to write at the college level and that they do not need to further

Gender and Educational Attainment
There are significant differences between the genders in terms of the educational success of girls and of boys.
In the 1960s, boys achieved results that were on average 5% better than girls. Until the mid 1980s, boys out–performed girls at all levels of the
education system, with the exception of 11+. Most educational writers read this as being 'proof ' that girls were generally less intelligent than boys
and that boys were 'late developers '.
There was little serious challenge to this type of thinking until the 1960s and 1970s when feminists pointed out that the better school performance of
boys was not the result of the superiority of male intelligence, but that the educational experiences of boys and girls were very different....show more
content...
Furthermore, Hartman points out that the attention that is paid to gender differences in achievement is large when compared to the way much larger
differences in attainment between the social classes are ignored.
Traditionally high achieving females have come from middle–class backgrounds. Riddell (1992) found that middle–class girls shared the achievement
values of the school and sought the approval of teachers. Working–class girls saw their futures in terms of the local job market combined with
motherhood and domesticity. However, Sharpe (1994) found working–class girls ' attitudes had changed dramatically in the past 20 years with careers,
travel and independence now increasingly valued.
Such attitudes reflect what Wilkinson (1994) refers to as the 'genderquake ' whereby young females are increasingly striving for a fulfilling career
with good earning potential. Thus young women are more confident, assertive and ambitious; striving for gender equality. There has been a huge
growth in the numbers of women working, with successful career women operating as positive role models. In 2005, figures show nearly double the
number of women entering high status careers such as medicine and the law. Working mothers are providing positive role models for their daughters.
Fuller (1984) found in her study of black girls in Brent, that girls were motivated not to end up in dead–end jobs like their mothers. Working class
unqualified women still tend to be

College Level Reflection Paper
While registering for a college–level course, last year, I questioned how difficult the class would be. I had taken a course the previous semester that
had covered the basics in business and economy, yet this would be the first course in English–a topic that I had been told, on many occasions, that I
excelled in. Because of this, I came into this year's English class confident and sure that I would receive top marks easily. Unfortunately, it was not so.
I struggled through several of the assignments given to me, yet I learned several new techniques and gained insight in what a college–level essay truly
consists of. Because of this class, I learned of the importance of transitions between points, the importance of reducing wordiness in sentences, and the
importance of explaining information and quotations fully.
Over the course of this class, my essays have changed and improved in the way of transitions. At the beginning of the semester, I wrote an introductory
reflective essay that covered how I felt about reading or writing. While I enjoyed researching and thinking over the topic thoroughly, the actual act of
writing it went poorly, according to the feedback I received from my teacher. The paper was riddled with pencil marks describing issues, the most
prevalent of these being transitions between points and paragraphs. I had been previously taught to write a sentence at the end of a paragraph
explaining all that I covered in it, to sum it up. Unfortunately, academic,

Appeasement Essay
Appeasement
The task of explaining why appeasement, has been continuously addressed by historians over the years. To date, there is still no single cause
identified. Nonetheless there is however a general consensus amongst historians that the frightful events of world war one, distilled a sense of fear and
regret amongst British society, and consequently Britain strived to prevent any future war, through whatever means necessary. In theaftermath of World
War 1, lay a mutual understanding between the British government and society that never again should a catastrophe such as World War 1 occur, it
was described as the "war to end all wars" reinforcing the view that it was a cataclysmic event which should never be re–enacted upon...show more
content...
As it became evident that the policy of appeasement had failed in 1939 and that Britain would in fact go to war, the Liberal Leader Sir Archibald
Sinclair expressed his feelings on the achievements of appeasement " We have eaten dirt in vain" This statement is clearly expressing the fact that
Britain has tolerated the deceitful acts of Germany to no avail or successes. That the policy of appeasement was deemed to fail from the onset.
Concluding that the policy was pointless as it only prolonged the inevitable. In order to make an informed conclusion to whether or not appeasement
was the correct policy to pursue, it is essential to look at the events and debates leading up to the out–break of world war 2. The system of collective
security, which was in part demanded by the British Public, came in the form of The League Of Nations. This was to be a system in which international
disputes between nations would be settled by negotiation.
The responsibility of the League was to act as an arbitrator in disputes between nations and to provide effective collective security against any form of
military aggression.
There were mixed opinions towards the League. Alan Sharp had referred to the League of Nations as a "compromise agreement, which pleased none
of the parties involved." It was also referred to by Marshall Foch, the military commander–in–chief of the allied armies at the end of the war as, "this is
not peace. It is an armistice for twenty years".

Essay on Igor Stravinsky
IGOR STRAVINSKY
Igor Stravinsky is considered by many the greatest composer of the 20th Century. Several composers have made breakthroughs and great
accomplishments in the past 100 years, but Stravinsky has dominated nearly every trend set. He was born near St. Petersburg, Russia in Oranienbaum,
on June 17, 1882. He was born to a famous Russian bass opera singer, Fyodor Ignatyevich Stravinsky.
Igor Stravinsky was third of a family of four boys. He grew up hearing his father practicing his opera and attending local ballets. He also started taking
piano lessons when he was 9 years old and continued on with musical notation and composition instruction. All throughout his early life he studied
music. However, although he had been brought...show more content...
He was so impressed by Stravinsky's promise as a composer that he invited him to join his small group of artistic assistants. For the rest of the 1909
season Diaghilev asked Stravinsky to compose various pieces of ballet music. Then, in 1910, Diaghilev commissioned Stravinsky to compose his new
ballet, The Firebird.
The result of his commission was the first real modern ballet. It set the example of the composer consulting both with the choreographer and the stage
/costuming artist during the composition.
&#9;For the next few years, Stravinsky and Diaghilev worked very closely together. Diaghilev wanted all of Stravinsky's new works to be
produced by his company. Stravinsky's next two works for the ballet, Petrouchka (1910–11) and The Rite of Spring (1912–13) are perfectly crafted,
powerful pieces, drawing on Stravinsky's rhythmic and harmonic imagination. The most amazing part is that Stravinsky had not even reached middle
age at the time he composed these pieces. The Rite of Spring created a violent reaction because no one had ever heard music that carried this much
premature power. It was almost as though there was a sense of jealousy from his colleagues. The entire musical establishment criticized stravinsky, but
he didn't really seem to care.
&#9;During World War I, Stravinsky lived in Switzerland. There he concentrated on smaller
–scale chamber pieces, piano works, and songs. One
of these, The Soldier's Tale,

Advanced English Reading Essay
What difference has Advanced English Reading course made to my learning ––A Summary Report of Advanced English Reading
After the end of Advanced English Reading course I have to take the question into consideration that what I have gained? Reading skills? High grades
in final examination? Or a certificate of CET–6? All above are not I have gained or not enough, and not worth to discussing them. What I considered
them worth to discussing even not gained enough are writing skills, courage of opening mouth to speck English in public and the point that should been
learning how to think with critical thinking. And I believe there is more big significance to discuss those gains in my further learning, my career and
my life.
Those gains come to my learning inch by inch.
I have to illustrate the reason that I discusses the gain of writing skills not reading skills even though them are similar in developing a man`s thought to
some extent is writing skills more reflects personal thinking. Writing skills build on several essays. In the first essay " Your College Years", I even
forgot use a title; and there were some many problems been found, for example, incoherence of point of view, wrong word, wordy,...show more
content...
And in Advanced English Reading course, professor Wang showing us what is critical thinking by ten texts and her actions and words, developing our
critical thinking by presentation and composition. In my view, gains of writing skills and courage of opening mouth to speck English is serve to
critical thinking: writing skills make contributions to express personal thought accurately and the basis of courage to speck English is critical thinking.
So, the set of Advanced English Reading course can come true the target of critical

How Democratic Is the Uk? Essay
Democracy in the United Kingdom has changed a lot over the years however the definition has never changed. The right for people to choose and
decide how a country is run. This essay will help decide whether the United Kingdom still follows that definition of being a true democracy and
analysing how this has affected the people of the UK.
The first thing to look at is the various types of democracy used in the UK. There are many examples of the various types of democracies with the first
being direct democracy. A recent example of what a direct democracy can do is the Scottish Referendum taking place throughout Scotland. This allows
the people of Scotland to take the decision of independence in to their own hands. This is a great example...show more content...
The people who vote for losing candidates in a seat might just as well have just not voted in the first place. Whether their candidate loses by 20,000
votes or by one, the outcome is the same. Similarly, if a candidate wins by 20,000 votes, 19,999 of his or her votes are 'wasted'.
Another common criticism of the UK system is that, although most politicians are elected, many powerful people hold their positions without having
to face the voters. Over the years criticism has focused on the House of Lords, the civil service and judges. While the people serving these positions
may indeed be experts in their field, the citizens of the UK have absolutely no say in who is elected into these positions. This shows a problem in the
United Kingdom's democratic system and one that does not follow a representative democracy.
While the United Kingdom is considered a representative democracy it is arguable to how representative it is of everyone. It is highly unlikely that
you would ever find an MP is Parliament who is from a lower class background with the majority of MPs coming from the middle and upper classes.
This shows a problem with the UK's system as not everyone is getting their voices heard in this regard. While it is possible for pressure groups to get
their views heard by governments, they will ensure that pressure groups do not become so powerful they steal the government's legitimacy.
In conclusion it can be argued that the United Kingdom's

Language and power 1
Power is gained in many ways throughout the text. Text I has been written, primarily, to persuade an audience to share their (bwag) views on the new
Sainsburys being built in their "medieval heritage" town of Bishops Waltham, therefore it is aimed at residents of the town who are old enough to
write a valid letter of complaint – age 18–70. Firstly, imperatives are used to be assertive right from the beginning of the text. The word "write" in
"write a letter today" immediately sets a forward and confident tone to the text, making the matter seem important. As Bishops Waltham is a town
without a superstore, this suggests it is small. This also suggests that the bwag group is also small therefore may not be well known to...show more
content...
As the law is seen as a very serious matter by everyone, the use of jargon and words that have connotations of the law, backs up the seriousness that
the text is trying to portray. Although the piece asserts influential power, using jargon of the law makes it seem as if instrumental power is being
asserted. These abstract nouns add a severe tone to the piece which forces the audience to think of consequences too. Because the consequence of a
Sainsburys being built is exaggerated "...the huge increase in traffic." and "...destroy the vitality." Panic is aroused within the reader as to what might
happen if they don't abide by what they're being told to do as well as thinking of the guilt that they will feel. This leads to the bwag group gaining
power over the audience by making them feel guilty and putting blame on them if a Sainsburys were to be built. Due to the group proclaiming serious
consequences on the towns people if they do not write letters, the consequences seem drastic, once again making it feel like instrumental power in the
form of the law – they have no choice to follow the instructions as there will be consequences.
In addition, bias is also used to sway the audience decision, making them agree with their (bwag) views and therefore gaining respect as the audience
now see that what they are trying to do is right and should therefore look up to them. By listing off different negative

Humanistic Psychology Essay examples
In general, human nature consists of three main parts: the mind (intellect), the body (biological makeup) and the spirit (emotional makeup). As the
mind and the body are being well explored in behaviorism and psychoanalysis, the spirit of a person has been increasingly popular from the mid–20th
century. In the early 1960s, a movement named third–force psychology started as a reaction to the defect of behaviorism and psychoanalysis to deal
fully with the human condition (Hergenhahn, 2008). This third–force movement is humanistic psychology, which refers to the combination of the
philosophy of romanticism and existentialism. Humanistic psychology instead paid more attention to each individual's potentials and highlighted the
importance...show more content...
The major difference between existential and humanistic psychology is that the former views human nature as neutral whereas the latter views it as
basically good (Hergenhahn, 2008). There is no right to determine which one is correct. I prefer believing that people at birth are naturally
kind–hearted. No one is born for being evil, and I think the reason why a man will become evil is their experiences in nurturing. This reminds me of the
Three Character Classic that is one of the Chinese classic texts. The first four verses tell us the core of Confucianism: human nature is inherently good,
which is similar to the humanistic psychology in the Western country. This idea was written in the 13th century and has come down to us. Although
there are many other opposite statements of human nature, I believe that thinking positively is better, especially for health.
When it comes back to existential psychology, the first person I want to talk about is Rollo May, an American existential psychologist. May (1967) and
other existentialists emphasized the importance of freedom and life meaning. The dual aspect of human nature is that people exist physically in the
sense and they also make the experiences meaningful by interpreting, valuing, and making decisions. In my opinion, people have the basic rights to
make their own decisions. Because of the participation of humans, the tasks needed to be done become significant.

Law, Fault Essay (Aqa)
Fault Essay (30 marks) Fault can be defined as legal responsibility or blame for an offence or misdeed. It also refers to the mental state of the
defendant. The basic principle is that a D should be able to contemplate the harm that his actions may cause and should therefore aim to avoid such
actions. In general, a person cannot be criminally liable and subjected to criminal sanctions unless it can be proved that he carried out an illegal act in
a blameworthy manner. An act does not make a man guilty of a crime unless his mind is also guilty. The state of mind of the D is hugely important in
assessing whether or not he is at fault. However, to be found guilty of most criminal offences (true crimes) both an AR and MR must be proved. The
...show more content...
There are a few absolute liability offences, so convictions like these are rare. There is no liability for omissions to act, even if the D is morally at fault,
for example, no by–stander can be compelled by law to save a drowning child. Exceptions to this general rule have been created where the law has
imposed a duty to act. Pittwood and Miller. Generally a failure, such as in these cases, will be punished less severely than where a positive
voluntary action has been committed. Causation: in result of factual and legal causation must be established. In other words there will be no
liability if the D did not cause the result White. The decision on whether the D is at fault may depend on which test for legal causation is used by
the courts; a D may escape liability if the 'daftness' test in Roberts/Williams is applied, whereas the harsher thins skull rule in Blaue may result in
liability as it involves taking your victim as you find him however daft or unpredictable they are. The MR is the mental or fault element of the crime
and is of key importance in establishing fault. All of the non–fatal offences require proof of fault for a conviction. For a s.18 offence, direct intention
Mohan (highest level of fault as it is deliberate) or oblique intention (lower level of fault as it was not the D's aim, but the D appreciated the result was
a virtual certainty Woollin) is required. This is because

Purpose of the Declaration of Independence
Rights of the People
A democracy is a system of government controlled by the people, not by one certain group or individual. In the Declaration of Independence it states
that "all men are created equal," an idea which leads to the concept that all citizens should have the same rights, responsibilities, and influence in the
governing of their country. In writing the Declaration of Independence Thomas Jefferson was trying to break his ties with the harsh and non–democratic
rule of the British and begin a new, equal society and government for America.
Democracy is defined as "A system of government in which ultimate political authority is vested in the People." The Declaration's...show more content...
He believed that it was time for America to break away from Britain's rule and become its own nation, which could govern itself. To do this, though, it
was necessary to write some sort of document which would state to the world the basic beliefs on which the nation's new government would be built.
This document was the Declaration of Independence. Jefferson felt that Britain was doing nothing but hurting America with unfair rules and all sorts of
ridiculous taxes. The colonies and colonists had no rights in determining the very laws which dictated the way they led their lives. The Declaration of
Independence was a formal document stating that the people of America were breaking away from Britain and that the American colonies were now
"Free and Independent States."
The Declaration of Independence was the cornerstone of American freedom and equality. By writing this document, the American Colonies could now
begin the process of starting a new way of life and a new government. Obviously, at the time the Declaration of Independence was written the concept
of "equality" was more limited than it is today. Certainly, all members of colonial America did not share equal status. However the concepts of the
Declaration of Independence have evolved more fully over the centuries

Antihistamines

More Related Content

Similar to Antihistamines

Recently uploaded

Antihistamines