• “A modern charity”
IN
• “The changing landscape”
What might it mean for the
overall charity ecosystem?
Paul’s ‘cooking ingredients’
• Brightest thinkers/most skilled practitioners
• Enterprising, growing (faster than competitors)
• Strong brand, well-positioned with stakeholders
• A strategic culture – analysing/planning
• Financially sustainable
• Delivering quality services, with like-minded
partners, that reduce crime
More impact and more influence
The UK charity universe in 2011
• 200,000 registered charities
• Total sector income over £50 billion
• Investments £80 billion
• Only 1,400 with income over £5m
• 160,000 with income <£25k
• 20% in the middle ground
Universal features of a ‘modern charity’?
• A strategic culture
• Financially sustainable
• Transparent and accountable
• Strong focus on outcomes and public
benefit
• So the challenge for the voluntary sector is to gear up
for this
• And to shift its emphasis away from “can we find
someone to continue funding what we are already
doing” to:
o Will anyone want to buy and make use of our
products and services?
o Are there enough people out there who will want
to buy what we do?
o Can we provide our services within prescribed costs
and quality guidelines?
Payment by results
The changing landscape
• 38,000 charities receive a government grant or
deliver services under contract
• But 140,000 have no relationship with the state
• Government funding is 36% of sector income
• An increase from 27% in 1991
• There has been a major shift from grants to
contracts – 50/50 ten years ago; 25/75 now
Huge cuts in public spending
• £81bn of cuts over next four years to 2014-15
• Central government departments cut by 19%
• Funding to local authorities cut by up to 30%
• And two further years of cuts forecast yesterday
‘Big Society’ may lack traction, but
there are real changes appearing
• Localism Act 2011
• Remodelling public service delivery –
„provider agnostic‟ and payment-by-
results
• New ideas around giving – social
finance
The sector’s ecosystem is changing
A squeezed middle
• The large, national household names are riding
the storm…
• …and community organisations continue to
thrive
• But life is getting tougher for middle-sized
organisations
Many service deliverers increasingly
dependent on state funding
• Will they become constrained in their
campaigning…
• …and/or relegated to role of largely powerless
sub-contractors?
• “Charities assisting commercial organisations to
maximise their profits” (NCIA)
The rise of social enterprise
• Big Society Capital has £600m to invest
over four years
• Will „traditional‟ charities be able to
adjust to new forms of financing?
• What is social enterprise, and might it
be captured by for-profit interests?
Source: Ipsos MORI
Don’t trust
them at all
Trust them
completely
1%
6%
3%3% 3%
5%
23%
10%
5%
19%
20%
2%
1%
4%
18%
11%
8%
22%22%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2005
2008
2005 Mean Score: 6.3 2008 Mean Score: 6.6
It’s all about retaining public trust
and confidence
• Charity must retain its distinctive brand if public trust
is to remain high
Sector behaviour the public want to see
• Transparent and accountable
• Independent, non-political
• Brave and innovative
• Collaborative, not competitive
• Providing VFM, and delivering public
benefit
• Building public trust and confidence

Andrew hindpresentation

  • 1.
    • “A moderncharity” IN • “The changing landscape” What might it mean for the overall charity ecosystem?
  • 2.
    Paul’s ‘cooking ingredients’ •Brightest thinkers/most skilled practitioners • Enterprising, growing (faster than competitors) • Strong brand, well-positioned with stakeholders • A strategic culture – analysing/planning • Financially sustainable • Delivering quality services, with like-minded partners, that reduce crime More impact and more influence
  • 3.
    The UK charityuniverse in 2011 • 200,000 registered charities • Total sector income over £50 billion • Investments £80 billion • Only 1,400 with income over £5m • 160,000 with income <£25k • 20% in the middle ground
  • 4.
    Universal features ofa ‘modern charity’? • A strategic culture • Financially sustainable • Transparent and accountable • Strong focus on outcomes and public benefit
  • 5.
    • So thechallenge for the voluntary sector is to gear up for this • And to shift its emphasis away from “can we find someone to continue funding what we are already doing” to: o Will anyone want to buy and make use of our products and services? o Are there enough people out there who will want to buy what we do? o Can we provide our services within prescribed costs and quality guidelines? Payment by results
  • 6.
    The changing landscape •38,000 charities receive a government grant or deliver services under contract • But 140,000 have no relationship with the state • Government funding is 36% of sector income • An increase from 27% in 1991 • There has been a major shift from grants to contracts – 50/50 ten years ago; 25/75 now
  • 7.
    Huge cuts inpublic spending • £81bn of cuts over next four years to 2014-15 • Central government departments cut by 19% • Funding to local authorities cut by up to 30% • And two further years of cuts forecast yesterday
  • 8.
    ‘Big Society’ maylack traction, but there are real changes appearing • Localism Act 2011 • Remodelling public service delivery – „provider agnostic‟ and payment-by- results • New ideas around giving – social finance The sector’s ecosystem is changing
  • 10.
    A squeezed middle •The large, national household names are riding the storm… • …and community organisations continue to thrive • But life is getting tougher for middle-sized organisations
  • 12.
    Many service deliverersincreasingly dependent on state funding • Will they become constrained in their campaigning… • …and/or relegated to role of largely powerless sub-contractors? • “Charities assisting commercial organisations to maximise their profits” (NCIA)
  • 13.
    The rise ofsocial enterprise • Big Society Capital has £600m to invest over four years • Will „traditional‟ charities be able to adjust to new forms of financing? • What is social enterprise, and might it be captured by for-profit interests?
  • 14.
    Source: Ipsos MORI Don’ttrust them at all Trust them completely 1% 6% 3%3% 3% 5% 23% 10% 5% 19% 20% 2% 1% 4% 18% 11% 8% 22%22% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2005 2008 2005 Mean Score: 6.3 2008 Mean Score: 6.6 It’s all about retaining public trust and confidence • Charity must retain its distinctive brand if public trust is to remain high
  • 15.
    Sector behaviour thepublic want to see • Transparent and accountable • Independent, non-political • Brave and innovative • Collaborative, not competitive • Providing VFM, and delivering public benefit • Building public trust and confidence