Altitude training is an established method to improve endurance performance, but also high intensity sports can benefit from it's use. There are a few important points to consider however to maximize it's effects and to become an altitude training responder !
5. • Sprinting: world records
Thin air, less resistance
• Endurance:
• Altitude born athletes (Kenya, Ethiopia, Mexico)
dominated.
• Non-altitude born athletes underperformed.
• Triggered research in effects of altitude on
performance
History
13. 1. Live high, train high (LHTH)
2. Live high, train low (LHTL)
3. Intermittent hypoxic training (IHT)
Types
14. 1. Live high, train high (LHTH)
Types
• Meta analysis: some athletes show improved performance,
some not.
Better results if key parameters (altitude, # days, test day)
are well controlled!
• At high altitude, the inability to do hard workouts at same
intensity as at low altitudes, may be deciding factor in
whether performance improves or not
• Due to, at high altitude, depressed:
- Motor unit recruitment
- Cardiac output
- VO2max
Bonetti & Hopkins Sports Med 2009
15. 1. Live high, train high (LHTH)
2. Live high, train low (LHTL)
• How
• Research
Types
16. • Train in the valley
• Normobaric hypoxia
• Altitude tents, altitude house
Decrease the concentration of oxygen via nitrogen dilution or oxygen
filtration.
LHTL – How?
18. 1. Live high, train high (LHTH)
LHTL - Research
at high altitude, the inability to do hard workouts at same intensity
as at low altitudes, may be deciding factor in whether
performance improves or not
Due to, at high altitude, depressed:
Motor unit recruitment
Cardiac output
VO2max
Levine, et al. (1997). ‘Living high–training low’: effect of moderate-altitude acclimatization with low altitude
training on performance. Journal of Applied Physiology, 83, 102–112.
19. Mixed results
• Statistical Significance:
A statistically insignificant improvement in studies might be substantial to
an athlete. For example a few seconds in a 5k is a BIG deal to a world
class runner, but may not be significant scientifically
• Responders vs. Non Responders
• Placebo
• Neural recruitment and CNS may play a bigger role in fatigue
than oxygen supply model predicts.
LHTL - Research
20. 1. Live high, train high (LHTH)
2. Live high, train low (LHTL)
Most efficient
Types
22. 1/ Genetics
• EPO gene
• ACE gene
• Wide inter-individual variability in erythropoietic response
to altitude training
• Altitude not high enough to stimulate EPO production in that
specific athlete?
• Does not allow prediction of the variation in the increase Hb mass
or sea-level performance
• Oxygen delivery not performance limiting factor in that
specific athlete
Friedmann et al, BJSM, 2005
Responder vs non responder?
23. 2/ Negative effects of altitude
• Decrease in maximum intensity workload
• Fatigue occurs with less muscle fatigue and at lower cardiac outputs
• Blood viscosity ++
• Recovery
• dehydration
LIVE HIGH TRAIN LOW
Responder vs non responder?
24. 3/ 5 I’s
• Intensity
• Illness
• Intake
• Iron
• Injury
Altitude training is an important stressor !
Increased risk for overload
Responder vs non responder?
25. 3/ 5 I’s
• Intensity
• Progressive increase
• Recovery ++
• Illness
• Intake
• Iron
• Injury
Responder vs non responder?
27. • 5 I’s
• Intensity
• Illness
• Immune suppression
• Prevention !! (probiotics, washing hands,…)
• URT / GI
• No altitude (if possible)
• Intake
• Iron
• Injury
Responder vs non responder?
28. • 5 I’s
• Intensity
• Infection
• Intake
• ++ protein
• ++ carbs
• Hydration
• Iron
• Injury
Responder vs non responder?
29. • 5 I’s
• Intensity
• Infection
• Intake
• Iron
• Lab: Ferritin
• Supplement 100mg/d (start 2-4w earlier) + vit C
(Garvican & Martin, PLOS ONE, 2012)
• Injury
Responder vs non responder?
30. • 5 I’s
• Intensity
• Infection
• Intake
• Iron
• Injury
• Prolonged inflammatory responses may interfere with
altitude adaptations
Responder vs non responder?
31. • How high?
• 2000 – 2500m
• Gradually (sleep quality)
• How long?
• Minimum 4 weeks to stimulate EPO production (hematological)
• 5 days in, 2 days off
• 10 hr/d
• < 3 weeks seems enough for valuable changes in muscle buffer
capacity, hypoxic ventilator response or NA+/K+ ATP-ase
capacity. (non-hematological)
• Rappels ?
• Compete
• 1 – 3 days
• 12 – 21 days
Practical issues
Millet et al., 2010
Suslov. 1994 Basic Principles of Altitude Training.
32. Testing the effects of altitude
1. Red cell volume
• Total Hb mass (CO rebreathing technique)
• 1% increase / 100h exposure
2. VO2 max
• 4ml O2/min per gram Hb
3. Performance
• Numerous other performance confounders
Gore, J Appl Phys, 2014
Practical issues
33. 1. Live high, train high (LHTH)
2. Live high, train low (LHTL)
3. Intermittent Hypoxic Training (IHT)
Types
34. • Training at simulated high altitude
• No effect on EPO or performance
Julian et al, 2004, J Appl Physiol
Intermittent Hypoxic Training
35. • Training at simulated high altitude
• No effect on EPO or performance
Julian et al, 2004, J Appl Physiol
Intermittent Hypoxic Training
36. Altitude Training has both positive and negative effects.
Live high and train low to minimize the negative effects of altitude.
For individual athletes, must find a high enough altitude to elicit significant
EPO production to lead to increased RBC mass.
Response to altitude is highly individualized
Responders vs. Non Responders
Future Considerations
neuromuscular mechanisms are more important for performance than
previously thought?
VO2max not be all end all.
SuSummary
41. Summary
Altitude Training has both positive and negative effects.
Best approach seems to be to live high and train low to minimize the
negative effects of altitude.
For individual athletes, must find a high enough altitude to elicit significant
EPO production to lead to increased RBC mass.
Response to altitude is highly individualized
Responders vs. Non Responders
Future Considerations
neuromuscular mechanisms are more important for performance than
previously thought?
VO2max not be all end all.
42. Summary
Altitude Training has both positive and negative effects.
Best approach seems to be to live high and train low to minimize the
negative effects of altitude.
For individual athletes, must find a high enough altitude to elicit significant
EPO production to lead to increased RBC mass.
Response to altitude is highly individualized
Responders vs. Non Responders
Future Considerations
neuromuscular mechanisms are more important for performance than
previously thought?
VO2max not be all end all.
Editor's Notes
Duidelijk maken het onderscheid tussen altitude training om effectief op hoogte te gaan moeten presteren of te klimmen (waarbij de effectiviteit onomstotelijk bewezen is) en altitude training om prestatie op zeeniveau te verbeteren
Vraagtekens gezien er geen absolute eensgezindheid is omtrent het prestatieverhogend effect / onduidelijkheid betreffende een paar studies (wat betreffende het
What triggered interest in altitude training…
Tommie Smith world record 200m 19.83
T
Note that even with a significant VO2max increase of the HiHi group, there was not a significant reduction in 5k times like there was in the HiLo group. This means that even with an increase in VO2max, other mechanisms must have declined in the HiHi groups that did not in the HiLo group. What is this mechanism? It’s something Neural
HiLo provides the benefits of improved oxygen carrying capacity while allowing the athletes to train at a higher intensity at low elevations and not suffer neural consequences.
Studie die toont dat ijzersupplementatie belangrijk is, zelfs zonder aangetoond tekort op labo (yann le meur)
Studie die toont dat ijzersupplementatie belangrijk is, zelfs zonder aangetoond tekort op labo (yann le meur)