Ted Cruz's wife Heidi has strong establishment credentials, having worked for Goldman Sachs, the Bush administration, and other establishment organizations. This calls into question how anti-establishment Cruz claims to be. While Cruz criticized previous Republican candidates, his own family ties suggest he is as connected to the establishment as the candidates he criticized. Rand Paul fired back at Cruz's criticisms, arguing that Reagan was also criticized for being an "appeaser" but had the leadership to reassess policy when lives were at risk without a clear mission.
A massive discussion on csio about syrian warAgha A
This document discusses Russia's intervention in Syria and differing views on whether it should be stopped or supported. It includes comments from several members of the "Centre for Study of Intelligence Operations" Facebook group. Some support Russia's actions, believing they are trying to stabilize the region and fight terrorists, while others argue Russia is trying to bolster its influence and the consequences will be disastrous for Syria. There is also a discussion about US passiveness in Syria and criticisms of those calling for US intervention without fully understanding the complex situation.
#38 who is the true threat to the west-5pgDaniel Wambua
Very good essay about threats to the west. America and other western have had threats coming from the middle west and economic threats from Asia particularly China.
Eldridge Cleaver was interviewed at his Berkeley apartment about his views on the 1960s and his time with the Black Panthers. Some key points:
- Cleaver sees both positives and negatives from the 1960s movements. Positives include ending segregation and withdrawing from Vietnam, but negatives include the left becoming too ideological in their anti-American views.
- Looking back on his Black Panther days, Cleaver is amazed at how little blood was spilled during such a large transformation in America. However, he acknowledges the Panthers did try to provoke violence as part of their revolutionary strategy.
- Cleaver became disillusioned with communism after experiencing life under totalitarian regimes in Cuba, Algeria, and other
The document discusses several issues related to US trade policy and protectionism under the Trump administration. It notes that while protectionist policies like import substitution may increase domestic production and jobs in the short term, they also carry significant risks and difficulties, such as inflation, disruption of global supply chains, and technical challenges transitioning production. Imposing tariffs on US imports could increase consumer prices in the US by as much as 0.8% according to some estimates. The complexity of integrated global supply chains also makes trade wars a complicated matter that may not necessarily increase domestic employment as intended. Overall, the document outlines both sides of the debate around protectionism.
Republicans see an opportunity to regain their traditional advantage on national security issues following the Paris attacks and questions about President Obama's strategy against ISIS. GOP candidates are criticizing Obama and promoting more hawkish approaches. However, Republicans face challenges as well, including needing comprehensive foreign policy plans and avoiding the perception that they simply want to re-engage in foreign wars. They also risk public backlash by taking extreme positions like closing mosques or banning refugees. Both parties will continue debating their approaches as national security becomes a central issue in the 2016 election.
A sociologist credited with predicting the fall of the Soviet Union has warned that US global power is in a phase of accelerated decline under the leadership of Donald Trump — and will collapse while the property mogul is the White House.
Norwegian professor Johan Galtung is known as the "founding father" of peace studies as a scientific subject and is recognised for correctly predicting numerous historical events, among them the Tiananmen Square uprising in China and the September 11 attacks.
He attracted controversy in 2000 when he predicted US global power would collapse by 2025.
A massive discussion on csio about syrian warAgha A
This document discusses Russia's intervention in Syria and differing views on whether it should be stopped or supported. It includes comments from several members of the "Centre for Study of Intelligence Operations" Facebook group. Some support Russia's actions, believing they are trying to stabilize the region and fight terrorists, while others argue Russia is trying to bolster its influence and the consequences will be disastrous for Syria. There is also a discussion about US passiveness in Syria and criticisms of those calling for US intervention without fully understanding the complex situation.
#38 who is the true threat to the west-5pgDaniel Wambua
Very good essay about threats to the west. America and other western have had threats coming from the middle west and economic threats from Asia particularly China.
Eldridge Cleaver was interviewed at his Berkeley apartment about his views on the 1960s and his time with the Black Panthers. Some key points:
- Cleaver sees both positives and negatives from the 1960s movements. Positives include ending segregation and withdrawing from Vietnam, but negatives include the left becoming too ideological in their anti-American views.
- Looking back on his Black Panther days, Cleaver is amazed at how little blood was spilled during such a large transformation in America. However, he acknowledges the Panthers did try to provoke violence as part of their revolutionary strategy.
- Cleaver became disillusioned with communism after experiencing life under totalitarian regimes in Cuba, Algeria, and other
The document discusses several issues related to US trade policy and protectionism under the Trump administration. It notes that while protectionist policies like import substitution may increase domestic production and jobs in the short term, they also carry significant risks and difficulties, such as inflation, disruption of global supply chains, and technical challenges transitioning production. Imposing tariffs on US imports could increase consumer prices in the US by as much as 0.8% according to some estimates. The complexity of integrated global supply chains also makes trade wars a complicated matter that may not necessarily increase domestic employment as intended. Overall, the document outlines both sides of the debate around protectionism.
Republicans see an opportunity to regain their traditional advantage on national security issues following the Paris attacks and questions about President Obama's strategy against ISIS. GOP candidates are criticizing Obama and promoting more hawkish approaches. However, Republicans face challenges as well, including needing comprehensive foreign policy plans and avoiding the perception that they simply want to re-engage in foreign wars. They also risk public backlash by taking extreme positions like closing mosques or banning refugees. Both parties will continue debating their approaches as national security becomes a central issue in the 2016 election.
A sociologist credited with predicting the fall of the Soviet Union has warned that US global power is in a phase of accelerated decline under the leadership of Donald Trump — and will collapse while the property mogul is the White House.
Norwegian professor Johan Galtung is known as the "founding father" of peace studies as a scientific subject and is recognised for correctly predicting numerous historical events, among them the Tiananmen Square uprising in China and the September 11 attacks.
He attracted controversy in 2000 when he predicted US global power would collapse by 2025.
Letter to the Nebraska Congressional DelegationJames Harrold
My letter to the five current members and one elected member of the Nebraska Congressional Delegation. As an American, I have an obligation to speak. So do you, though I accept your views and mine may differ. We should listen to each other.
This document summarizes an online discussion forum regarding the possibility of attacking Iran. Several members argue strongly against attacking Iran, noting that it could lead to wider war and has not been proven necessary. Others acknowledge Iran's capabilities but hope war can be avoided. One member speculates that a war with Iran could activate sleeper cells in other countries. Overall the discussion expresses skepticism towards military action and hopes for non-violent solutions.
The document summarizes several fringe or lesser-known candidates who are seeking their party's nomination for President in 2016. Terry Jones, who previously attempted to host a "Burn a Quran" event, believes America is in poor moral and economic condition. Robby Wells, seeking the Democratic nomination, has crafted the slogan "eagle-nomics" which combines left and right-wing policies. Phil Bralich describes his political views as between Noam Chomsky and Jesus Christ, and wants controversial Ann Coulter as his Vice President. Some candidates have difficulty getting media attention or are more quiet, like Patrick Drake who believes in "karma" over interviews.
The document discusses the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Robert Kennedy. It summarizes the events and aftermath, including the widespread speculation and conspiracy theories. The author believes that both assassinations were the result of conspiracies and that the same conspirators were involved in both. The author argues that parties like the CIA, FBI, military leaders, and anti-Castro Cubans all had the means, motive, and opportunity to orchestrate the assassinations.
A Craigslist ad from the San Fernando Valley section seeks black, Mexican, and/or Jewish women for a disturbing encounter referred to as "hate fucking" where the poster aims to show "what a real man can do." The ad promotes racist and prejudiced views in its description of the sought encounter.
The document discusses recruitment efforts for Operation PBSUCCESS and strategies for destabilizing the Guatemalan government, noting that direct US intervention may be needed to motivate defections in the army and spark the overthrow of the Arbenz regime. While not advocating changes to PBSUCCESS, the author argues that the threat of US action could convince anti-Calligeris factions in the army to oust Arbenz and preempt an intervention.
- The author argues that the Democratic party, not the Republican party, may face challenges after the 2020 election.
- Trump's 2016 victory was due to public frustration over issues like economic problems, illegal immigration, and being ignored by political elites. However, the analysis overlooks economic stagnation under previous administrations.
- If Trump loses, it will likely be by a narrow margin, and the Republican party will recover and win future elections. However, the author believes the Democrats' policies during the pandemic and on issues like crime and violence will lead to their defeat.
The document discusses the 2016 US Presidential Election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. It provides context about some of the issues discussed in videos and articles related to the election, including concerns that Trump's presidency could lead to increased discrimination, segregation, and terrorist attacks. It also notes that Clinton said "we build bridges not walls" in support of an open and united society rather than divisive isolation.
This document provides a lengthy critique of Bob Woodward's book "Fear" about President Trump. Some of the key points made include:
1) The document criticizes Woodward for being biased against Trump and questions the credibility of some of his sources and assertions.
2) It argues the book aims to politically undermine and discredit President Trump through "cheap gossip" and spreading rumors rather than serious scholarship.
3) The critique states the world has not become destabilized as Woodward claims it would due to Trump's leadership, and it questions the motives and timing of certain allegations in the book.
The document summarizes major events in the United States from 1991 to the present. It discusses the presidencies of Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., and Obama. Key events covered include the Gulf War under Bush Sr., impeachment of President Clinton, the 9/11 terrorist attacks under Bush Jr., and military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. It also mentions domestic issues like Reaganomics, the Moral Majority movement, and Clinton's attempted health care reform.
El documento describe los movimientos de rotación y traslación de la Tierra. Explica que la rotación es el movimiento de la Tierra sobre su eje cada 24 horas, mientras que la traslación es el movimiento alrededor del Sol que toma aproximadamente un año. Además, provee definiciones básicas de la Tierra.
Spire Law Group has filed a lawsuit in New York seeking the return of $43 trillion to the U.S. Treasury, which they allege was laundered by major banks and government officials. The lawsuit names high-level individuals as participants in the scheme, including Attorney General Holder, Treasury Secretary Geithner, and White House advisor Valerie Jarrett. Hours after CNBC reported on the lawsuit, the children of a CNBC executive were murdered, along with their nanny, in what some analysts suggest may have been a covert operation related to the case. The document provides background on the lawsuit's allegations and lists many research sources on related topics like 9/11 conspiracies, the Federal Reserve, and elite secret societies
La talpeta que volia saber qui li havia fet allò en el capmcaso
A mole wanted to know who had done something to her head. She asked various animals on her farm if they had done it, each responding no and demonstrating their natural behaviors. Finally, two flies helped her deduce that it was the butcher's dog, Sant Pere. The mole then quickly deposited feces on the dog's head before happily returning underground.
Here is the post that raised so much attentionAnonDownload
The document warns that society is declining rapidly and will soon face extreme evil. It advises people to firmly decide who they are and stand by their principles using logic rather than emotion. It predicts a cashless society, mandatory vaccines containing "marks," and the promotion of behaviors like homosexuality, bestiality, and pedophilia. It cautions that online relationships may not involve real people due to advanced AI. Overall, it sends a dire warning about impending societal and spiritual challenges and encourages resistance through strong principles.
This document provides answers to common interview questions for a project coordinator position. It discusses how to answer questions about yourself, your strengths, career goals, reasons for leaving previous jobs, weaknesses, knowledge of the organization, and ways you have improved your skills. For each question, it offers tips on what information to include and examples of effective responses. The document is meant to help job applicants prepare and feel confident answering common questions in a project coordinator interview.
Letter to the Nebraska Congressional DelegationJames Harrold
My letter to the five current members and one elected member of the Nebraska Congressional Delegation. As an American, I have an obligation to speak. So do you, though I accept your views and mine may differ. We should listen to each other.
This document summarizes an online discussion forum regarding the possibility of attacking Iran. Several members argue strongly against attacking Iran, noting that it could lead to wider war and has not been proven necessary. Others acknowledge Iran's capabilities but hope war can be avoided. One member speculates that a war with Iran could activate sleeper cells in other countries. Overall the discussion expresses skepticism towards military action and hopes for non-violent solutions.
The document summarizes several fringe or lesser-known candidates who are seeking their party's nomination for President in 2016. Terry Jones, who previously attempted to host a "Burn a Quran" event, believes America is in poor moral and economic condition. Robby Wells, seeking the Democratic nomination, has crafted the slogan "eagle-nomics" which combines left and right-wing policies. Phil Bralich describes his political views as between Noam Chomsky and Jesus Christ, and wants controversial Ann Coulter as his Vice President. Some candidates have difficulty getting media attention or are more quiet, like Patrick Drake who believes in "karma" over interviews.
The document discusses the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Robert Kennedy. It summarizes the events and aftermath, including the widespread speculation and conspiracy theories. The author believes that both assassinations were the result of conspiracies and that the same conspirators were involved in both. The author argues that parties like the CIA, FBI, military leaders, and anti-Castro Cubans all had the means, motive, and opportunity to orchestrate the assassinations.
A Craigslist ad from the San Fernando Valley section seeks black, Mexican, and/or Jewish women for a disturbing encounter referred to as "hate fucking" where the poster aims to show "what a real man can do." The ad promotes racist and prejudiced views in its description of the sought encounter.
The document discusses recruitment efforts for Operation PBSUCCESS and strategies for destabilizing the Guatemalan government, noting that direct US intervention may be needed to motivate defections in the army and spark the overthrow of the Arbenz regime. While not advocating changes to PBSUCCESS, the author argues that the threat of US action could convince anti-Calligeris factions in the army to oust Arbenz and preempt an intervention.
- The author argues that the Democratic party, not the Republican party, may face challenges after the 2020 election.
- Trump's 2016 victory was due to public frustration over issues like economic problems, illegal immigration, and being ignored by political elites. However, the analysis overlooks economic stagnation under previous administrations.
- If Trump loses, it will likely be by a narrow margin, and the Republican party will recover and win future elections. However, the author believes the Democrats' policies during the pandemic and on issues like crime and violence will lead to their defeat.
The document discusses the 2016 US Presidential Election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. It provides context about some of the issues discussed in videos and articles related to the election, including concerns that Trump's presidency could lead to increased discrimination, segregation, and terrorist attacks. It also notes that Clinton said "we build bridges not walls" in support of an open and united society rather than divisive isolation.
This document provides a lengthy critique of Bob Woodward's book "Fear" about President Trump. Some of the key points made include:
1) The document criticizes Woodward for being biased against Trump and questions the credibility of some of his sources and assertions.
2) It argues the book aims to politically undermine and discredit President Trump through "cheap gossip" and spreading rumors rather than serious scholarship.
3) The critique states the world has not become destabilized as Woodward claims it would due to Trump's leadership, and it questions the motives and timing of certain allegations in the book.
The document summarizes major events in the United States from 1991 to the present. It discusses the presidencies of Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., and Obama. Key events covered include the Gulf War under Bush Sr., impeachment of President Clinton, the 9/11 terrorist attacks under Bush Jr., and military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. It also mentions domestic issues like Reaganomics, the Moral Majority movement, and Clinton's attempted health care reform.
El documento describe los movimientos de rotación y traslación de la Tierra. Explica que la rotación es el movimiento de la Tierra sobre su eje cada 24 horas, mientras que la traslación es el movimiento alrededor del Sol que toma aproximadamente un año. Además, provee definiciones básicas de la Tierra.
Spire Law Group has filed a lawsuit in New York seeking the return of $43 trillion to the U.S. Treasury, which they allege was laundered by major banks and government officials. The lawsuit names high-level individuals as participants in the scheme, including Attorney General Holder, Treasury Secretary Geithner, and White House advisor Valerie Jarrett. Hours after CNBC reported on the lawsuit, the children of a CNBC executive were murdered, along with their nanny, in what some analysts suggest may have been a covert operation related to the case. The document provides background on the lawsuit's allegations and lists many research sources on related topics like 9/11 conspiracies, the Federal Reserve, and elite secret societies
La talpeta que volia saber qui li havia fet allò en el capmcaso
A mole wanted to know who had done something to her head. She asked various animals on her farm if they had done it, each responding no and demonstrating their natural behaviors. Finally, two flies helped her deduce that it was the butcher's dog, Sant Pere. The mole then quickly deposited feces on the dog's head before happily returning underground.
Here is the post that raised so much attentionAnonDownload
The document warns that society is declining rapidly and will soon face extreme evil. It advises people to firmly decide who they are and stand by their principles using logic rather than emotion. It predicts a cashless society, mandatory vaccines containing "marks," and the promotion of behaviors like homosexuality, bestiality, and pedophilia. It cautions that online relationships may not involve real people due to advanced AI. Overall, it sends a dire warning about impending societal and spiritual challenges and encourages resistance through strong principles.
This document provides answers to common interview questions for a project coordinator position. It discusses how to answer questions about yourself, your strengths, career goals, reasons for leaving previous jobs, weaknesses, knowledge of the organization, and ways you have improved your skills. For each question, it offers tips on what information to include and examples of effective responses. The document is meant to help job applicants prepare and feel confident answering common questions in a project coordinator interview.
El documento describe las herramientas web más utilizadas, incluyendo redes sociales como Twitter y Facebook que permiten publicar y compartir contenido, plataformas de videos como YouTube donde personas comparten y ven videos, herramientas de presentaciones como Prezi y SlideShare para crear y compartir presentaciones, y plataformas de comunicación como Skype y Wikispaces para comunicarse y colaborar en línea.
All b cruz- married into the tpp-nau establishmentAnonDownload
Ted Cruz's wife Heidi has strong establishment credentials, having worked for Goldman Sachs, the Bush administration, and other establishment organizations. This calls into question how anti-establishment Cruz claims to be. While Cruz criticized previous Republican candidates, his own family ties suggest he is as connected to the establishment as the candidates he criticized. Rand Paul fired back at Cruz's criticisms, arguing that Reagan was also criticized for being an "appeaser" but had the leadership to reassess policy when lives were at risk without a clear mission.
Bilderberg 2015 meeting participants list and photos telfs buchen, austria 11...AnonDownload
This document lists the participants of the 2015 Bilderberg Meetings in Telfs-Buchen, Austria from June 11-14. It includes over 130 attendees from 23 countries, primarily high-ranking politicians, business executives, academics, and journalists. Some of the notable participants include the Prime Ministers of Belgium and the Netherlands, the Chairman of BP and Volvo, the CEOs of Airbus, Google, and HSBC, and former US officials like Henry Kissinger, David Petraeus, and Robert Zoellick.
4 things we know about the secretive bilderberg groupAnonDownload
The document summarizes what is known about the secretive Bilderberg Group meetings between top politicians and business leaders. We know the annual meetings are held in different locations each year, such as Copenhagen in 2014 and the Austrian Alps in 2015. Attendees include politicians like George Osborne and Ed Balls as well as executives from companies like Google and Shell. Broad topics on the agenda are released like European strategy and terrorism. Heavy security is provided by host countries but specifics of discussions are never revealed to the public.
(U fouo) dhs infrastructure protection note- most significant tactics against...AnonDownload
This document provides a summary of tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used in attacks against electricity infrastructure from 2002-2013. It finds that targeted shootings, intentionally downing power lines, and bombings are the most common high-consequence TTPs. While attacks often cause equipment damage and power outages, the electricity grid has demonstrated resiliency and regional or national outages have not occurred. However, attacks highlighting potential vulnerabilities if multiple substations or transformers were damaged simultaneously. The financial costs of repairing damage from attacks can be extensive, even without outages.
Ranking presidents is often a popularity or name recognition contest. Let us instead rank presidents by how many lived or died because of them. This makes the worst presidents Nixon, Reagan, and Jackson, and the best presidents Lincoln, Van Buren, Carter, and Grant. Some both saved many lives and caused many deaths, like Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, and Obama.
David baxter the great sedition trial of 1944 -a personal memoir - journal ...RareBooksnRecords
This document provides a personal memoir from the author describing their involvement in the notorious 1944 Sedition Trial in the United States. The author outlines some background on their political views and activities leading up to the trial, including being a member of the Socialist Party and the American First Committee which opposed entering World War 2. They describe facing intense scrutiny and smear campaigns after speaking out against U.S. involvement in the war. This culminated in being one of 30 individuals indicted in the 1944 Sedition Trial in Washington D.C., where they faced charges including sedition and conspiracy. The author spent time in jail while the legal proceedings played out and defense was provided by the ACLU.
This document criticizes President Obama and his administration on several fronts:
1) It claims Obama is either intentionally destroying America or is the dumbest president ever due to his allegedly delusional beliefs about threats like global warming over terrorism.
2) It argues Obama ignores the true threats of terrorism and "chants of death to America" while overstating the threat of global warming, which the author believes is just natural weather patterns.
3) It criticizes Obama for inviting Bowe Bergdahl's father to the White House after his release from captivity, claiming his father sanctified the White House for Islam through his words.
4) It expresses dissatisfaction with agreements made with Iran,
The document discusses the concept of political courage as defined in John F. Kennedy's book "Profiles in Courage". It outlines how courage in politics involves taking positions that go against one's constituents or party in service of principle. While identifying courageous acts can be difficult, true courage often involves surprising votes or stances that challenge the status quo. The document argues politicians who never challenge their base lack political courage and are only motivated by self-interest rather than the greater good.
Militia whats in a word by david zunigaYoutubetoMp4
This document discusses the concept of militias and their role in defending against threats to American sovereignty and the Constitution. It argues that militias, as stipulated in the Constitution, are the only legitimate form of law enforcement and that recent federal policies have undermined militias. It promotes the idea of "American Militia 2.0" to change public perceptions of militias and help citizens establish new constitutional militias to enforce rule of law at the local level in response to threats posed by groups like the "Deep Axis" alliance. The document advocates for widespread membership in militias as a means to counter threats to American republican government.
Sen. Robert C. Byrd ‘On the brink of war’June 28, 2010 by Ken.docxlesleyryder69361
Sen. Robert C. Byrd: ‘On the brink of war’
June 28, 2010 by Ken Ward Jr.
Here is a speech that Sen. Robert C. Byrd delivered on the Senate floor on Feb. 12, 2003:
Madam President, to contemplate war is to think about the most horrible of human experience. On this February day, as this Nation stands at the brink of battle, every American on some level must be contemplating the horrors of war.
My wife says to me at night: Do you think we ought to get some of those large bottles, the large jugs, and fill them with water? She says: Go up to the attic and see if we don’t have two or three there. I believe we have two or three there.
And so I went up to the attic last evening and came back to report to her that, no, we didn’t have any large jugs of water, but we had some small ones, perhaps some gallon jugs filled with water. And she talked about buying up a few things, groceries and canned goods to put away.
I would suspect that kind of conversation is going on in many towns across this great, broad land of ours. And yet this Chamber is for the most part ominously, dreadfully silent. You can hear a pin drop. Listen. You can hear a pin drop. There is no debate. There is no discussion. There is no attempt to lay out for the Nation the pros and cons of this particular war. There is nothing.
What would Gunning Bedford of Delaware think about it? What would John Dickinson of Delaware think about it? What would George Read think about it? What would they say?
We stand passively mute in the Senate today, paralyzed by our own uncertainty, seemingly stunned by the sheer turmoil of events. Only on the editorial pages of some of our newspapers is there much substantive discussion concerning the prudence or the imprudence of engaging in this particular war. I can imagine hearing the walls of this Chamber ring just before the great war between the States, a war that tore this Nation asunder and out of which the great State of West Virginia was born.
But today we hear nothing, almost nothing, by way of debate. This is no small conflagration that we contemplate. It is not going to be a video game. It may last a day or 6 days. God created Earth, and man, the stars, the planets, and the Moon in 6 days. This war may last 6 days. It may last 6 weeks. It could last longer. This is no small conflagration that we contemplate. This is no simple attempt to defang a villain. No, this coming battle, if it materializes, represents a turning point in U.S. foreign policy and possibly a turning point in the recent history of the world.
The flag over the U.S. Capitol flies at half staff in honor of the passing of West Virginia Democratic Senator Robert C. Byrd in Washington Monday, June 28, 2010. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
This Nation is about to embark upon the first test of a revolutionary doctrine applied in an extraordinary way, at an unfortunate time–the doctrine of preemption, no small matter–the idea that the United States or any other nation can legitimately.
This document provides a rebuttal to a psychiatrist's assessment of President Trump's mental health. It argues that:
1) An aggressive personality style does not equate to violence, and there is no evidence of Trump's alleged "past violence."
2) Trump's comments about sexual assault were more akin to boasting about his success with women, not an endorsement of assault.
3) Speculation that Trump exhibits paranoia, recklessness, or lack of empathy is unfounded and ignores policy actions that show empathy.
4) Attempts to diagnose Trump's mental health from a distance are questionable, and his behavior reflects a straightforward and candid personality, not mental instability.
5) The
This document provides a rebuttal to a psychiatrist's assessment of President Trump's mental health. It argues that:
1) An aggressive personality style does not equate to violence, and there is no evidence of Trump's alleged "past violence."
2) Trump's comments about sexual assault were more akin to boasting about his success with women, not an endorsement of assault.
3) Critics unfairly attack Trump with unrelenting misinterpretations and fabrications in an attempt to undermine his presidency.
4) Despite tremendous harassment, Trump has managed to advance his agenda and get work done, showing he is stable and in touch with reality.
1) The document summarizes Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's controversial statements calling for banning all Muslims from entering the United States and potentially requiring Muslim Americans to register in a government database.
2) It draws comparisons between Trump's statements and Nazi Germany's treatment of Jews, including forcing Jews to wear gold Stars of David to identify their religion.
3) A political science professor is quoted saying that while Trump may not advocate for a corporatist state like fascist parties, he illustrates characteristics of fascist movements such as stereotyping an entire religious group.
FREE 15+ Argumentative Essay Samples in PDF | MS Word. FREE 16+ Argumentative Writing Samples & Templates in PDF | MS Word. argumentative paragraph examples. Argumentative Essay. Expository essay: Argumentative essay practice. Free Argumentative Essay Samples. Argumentative Essay: Definition, Outline & Examples of Argumentative .... Argumentative Essay Topics for College Assignments - Blog BuyEssayClub.com. How To Write a Compelling Argumentative Essay: Expert Tips & Guide .... Sample Essay Argumentative Writing Sample. argumentative essay examples for high school students. Argumentative essay. Sample Argumentative Essay.doc. Argumentative Writing - 6+ Examples, Format, Pdf | Examples. Argumentative Essay.docx | Higher Education | Government | Free 30-day .... What to write a argumentative paper on. How To Write A Good .... Definition Essay: Samples of argumentative essay writing. 017 Argumentative Essay Examples High School Printables Corner Samples .... Beautiful Counter Argument Essay Example ~ Thatsnotus. How to Write an Argumentative Essay – Samples and Topics. FREE 9+ Argumentative Essay Samples in PDF. Argumentative essay example short Truth or Consequences .... 004 Essay Example Ideas For Argumentative ~ Thatsnotus. 013 Argumentative Essays Examples Brilliant Ideas Of How To Write An .... 007 How To Write Claim For An Argumentative Essay Example .... Sample Argumentative Essay. Argumentative Essay Examples 6Th Grade Pdf / 10 Easy Argumentative ....
The document analyzes proposals for world government and argues they constitute treason against the United States. It claims the ultimate goals of prominent world government organizations like United World Federalists would reduce the American standard of living, curtail liberties, destroy free institutions, scrap the Constitution, abolish the military, and give away the Panama Canal. While many supporters have good intentions, the movement is actually controlled by socialists, communist sympathizers, and "One World Firsters" plotting to destroy the American way of life and create a global socialist superstate. Evidence suggests world government is being promoted to establish socialism in the U.S. Critics are dismissed while the movement's leadership hides its true aims behind patriotic rhetoric.
Donald j. Trump a President like no other by Conrad BlackTheotis Davis
Conrad Black, bestselling author of Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Champion of Freedom and Richard M. Nixon: A Life in Full, turns his attention to his "friend" President Donald J. Trump and provides the most intriguing and significant analysis yet of Trump's political rise. Ambitious in intellectual scope, contrarian in many of its opinions, and admirably concise, this is surely set to be one of the most provocative political books you are likely to read this year
6715, 1232 PMThe Psychology of Barack ObamaPage 1 of 3h.docxevonnehoggarth79783
6/7/15, 12:32 PMThe Psychology of Barack Obama
Page 1 of 3http://www.nationalinterest.org/print/commentary/the-psychology-barack-obama-9244
TweetTweet 0 [3] 3.2kLikeLike 27
Published on The National Interest (http://www.nationalinterest.org)
Home > The Psychology of Barack Obama
The Psychology of Barack Obama
[1]
Robert W. Merry [2]
In 1972, Duke University professor James David Barber brought out a book
that immediately was heralded as a seminal study of presidential character. Titled The Presidential Character: Predicting
Performance in the White House, the book looked at qualities of temperament and personality in assessing how the country’s
chief executives approached the presidency—and how that in turn contributed to their success or failure in the office.
Although there were flaws in Barber’s approach, particularly in his efforts to typecast the personalities of various presidents, it
does indeed lay before us an interesting and worthy matrix for assessing how various presidents approach the job and the
ultimate quality of their leadership. So let’s apply the Barber matrix to the presidential incumbent, Barack Obama.
Barber, who died in 2004, assessed presidents based on two indices: first, whether they were "positive" or "negative"; and,
second, whether they were "active" or "passive." The first index—the positive/negative one—assesses how presidents
regarded themselves in relation to the challenges of the office; so, for example, did they embrace the job with a joyful
optimism or regard it as a necessary martyrdom they must sustain in order to prove their own self-worth? The second index—
active vs. passive—measures their degree of wanting to accomplish big things or retreat into a reactive governing mode.
ShareShare 17
https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nationalinterest.org%2Fprint%2Fcommentary%2Fthe-psychology-barack-obama-9244&related=%3ACheck%20it%20out!&text=The%20Psychology%20of%20Barack%20Obama&tw_p=tweetbutton&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nationalinterest.org%2Fcommentary%2Fthe-psychology-barack-obama-9244&via=thenatlinterest
http://twitter.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nationalinterest.org%2Fcommentary%2Fthe-psychology-barack-obama-9244
http://www.nationalinterest.org/
http://www.nationalinterest.org/
http://www.nationalinterest.org/profile/robert-w-merry-0
http://www.nationalinterest.org/commentary/the-psychology-barack-obama-9244
javascript:void(0);
6/7/15, 12:32 PMThe Psychology of Barack Obama
Page 2 of 3http://www.nationalinterest.org/print/commentary/the-psychology-barack-obama-9244
These two indices produce four categories of presidents, to wit:
Active-Positive: These are presidents with big national ambitions who are self-confident, flexible, optimistic, joyful in the
exercise of power, possessing a certain philosophical detachment toward what they regard as a great game.
Active-Negative: These are compulsive people with low self-esteem, seekers of power as a means of self-act.
Similar to All b cruz- married into the tpp-nau establishment (16)
6715, 1232 PMThe Psychology of Barack ObamaPage 1 of 3h.docx
All b cruz- married into the tpp-nau establishment
1. Thursday, May 7, 2015
All B-Cruz: married into
the TPP/NAU establishment
Posted by Charleston Voice
Not a US citizen? No problem, it doesn't matter anymore! ¿No un
ciudadano estadounidense? ¡No hay problema, no importa más!
image: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3S7Q_dM1eVQ/VCmwU65GD-
I/AAAAAAAAI9Y/J7Ztn4znaP4/s1600/Ted_Cruz_El_Cubano_De_Canada%CC%81_LA
RGE%5B1%5D.jpg
If you consider yourself a Cruzer supporter
watch where you step. If you think the "tea
party" is your safe haven, you'll be
disappointed when you find out it's just
another appendage for GOP neocon leadership
propaganda.
The mouse trap is baited, don't lunge for the
cheese. Promise us all you'll jump off a bridge
after you support whom you thought was the
'lesser of two evils', when in fact there is no
lesser! The Cruzer and an opponent worship
at other alters than you or me.
Dr. Joel McDurmon
Mar 10, 2014
image: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YADA4AXbPpk/VCmjzBZ4r-
I/AAAAAAAAI9I/3atu3Wo_p04/s1600/warren%20buffett%20lloyd%20blankfein%5B1%5D.JPG
2. Good Fellas Blankfein, Goldman CEO and
Head Abortion Meister Buffett
During his CPAC speech this weekend, Senator Ted Cruz took shots at
previous Republican presidential candidates Dole, McCain, and Romney, for
lacking a “clear distinction” from big-government democrats. Well, I think
Mr. Cruz has got some ‘splaining to do. It seems he’s just as married—
literally—to the establishment as any of them.
A report from the ever-busy infowars.com reveals that Cruz’s wife, Heidi,
has some rather behemoth credentials:
Cruz’s insider connection is a family affair. His wife, Heidi, is a Goldman
Sachs vice president in Houston, Texas, according to her LinkedIn profile.
She also served as an economic advisor for the Bush administration. In
2011, a Cruz campaign spokesman portrayed Heidi as “an expert on North
American trade,” in other words she is savvy when it comes to globalist
transnational trade deals like NAFTA, the single most destructive
government move against the American worker in history.
She was also a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations (see
her bio at Claremont McKenna College), a position that expired prior to her
husband’s attack on the globalist organization.
The details come from a page listing Clermont-McKenna College’s Board of
Advisors, on which Mrs. Cruz apparently served. In addition to being one of
only three of W’s economic advisors,
3. She also served in the Administration as the economic director for the
Western Hemisphere at the National Security Council at the White House,
advising the President and then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice.
She also is a former director at the U.S. Treasury Department and was
special policy assistant to Ambassador Robert B. Zoellick, then Chief U.S.
international trade negotiator.
It also reveals that before Goldman Sachs, she worked for another tentacle
of the vampire squid, JPMorgan, “focusing on international structured
finance.”
image: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-
1a5sanaPQBc/VCmiv30vRHI/AAAAAAAAI9A/Lazw_GWrH_M/s1600/fh4eca65e4%5B1
%5D.png
None of this says “Tea Party,” “small government,” “sound money,” and
contrary to Cruz’s latest pitch, it also does not much support “standing on
principle”—unless that “principle” is fiat money, TARP bailouts, financing
wars, revolving doors, etc.
4. Now perhaps Mrs. Cruz’s career is not representative of the Senator’s
views. Or, if it is, perhaps the Senator has changed views in recent years.
He did later blast the CFR, but that seems to have come only after his wife’s
Term ended, and only when trying to present himself as a Tea Party
candidate.
But Cruz has wasted no time showing us to his views. Only a day after
falling a distant second behind Ran Paul (Paul 31%, Cruz only 11%) in the
CPAC straw poll, Cruz took a swipe, albeit a weak one, at Paul.
Breitbart.com reports that despite being a “big fan” of Rand Paul, Cruz
stated, “I don’t agree with him on foreign policy.”
There’s no doubt Paul is not an imperialist or a warmonger, but he has
certainly deviated from his father’s uncompromising non-interventionism.
When Fox News Sunday asked about his foreign policy, Paul answered,
I see my foreign policy in the same line as what came out of, probably, the
first George Bush. Henry Kissinger wrote something in the Washington Post
two days ago [here] which I agree with. I see it coming out of the
mainstream of the Republican position.
I opposed with real fervor the involvement of us in Syria, and that became
the dominant position in the country—both Republican and Democrat.
There’s not one Republican who’s saying we should put military troops in
Crimea, in the Ukraine. So I think I’m right in the middle of that position.
And I think that those who would try to argue that somehow I’m different
than the mainstream Republican opinion are people who want to take
advantage for their own personal political gain. I’m a great believer in
Ronald Reagan. I’m a great believer in a strong national defense. . . .
It’s perhaps not surprising then that in his sideswipe at Paul, Cruz didn’t
really give any real specifics, just vague sentimental references:
U.S. leadership is critical in the world. I agree we should be reluctant to
deploy military force aboard, but there’s a vital role, just as Ronald Reagan
did. When Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union an Evil Empire, when he
stood in front of the Brandenburg Gate and said ‘Tear down this wall.’ Those
5. words changed the course of history. The United States has a responsibility
to defend our values.
Of course, Paul seems to share all of these platitudes: who doesn’t believe
in “defending our values”? Who doesn’t believe in “U.S. leadership”? So as
criticisms these fall flat.
The real questions are things like, “Do we need 800 international military
bases to accomplish this?” “Do we need to maintain military bases in 63
countries?” “Do we need standing armies of 255,000 soldiers in foreign
countries?” “Can anyone who believes in fiscal responsibility and small
government seriously maintain $680+ billions each year in ‘defense’
spending?” And this is all not even considering the biblical doctrines regard
the military and war (Paul has hinted at some. Cruz has not, as far as I
know).
Since Paul shares the views Cruz mentioned, it seems that Cruz is either
uniformed (unlikely), dishonest (harsh), or is engaging in careless political
volleys.
Consider the results of CPAC, the latter seems most likely.
In fairness, Cruz was asked about Paul by an interviewer, so he had no
choice but answer. But his answer is vague grandstanding on things Paul
agrees with.
So, if we are to believe that Cruz’s answer distinguishes him from Paul
somehow, then he must have very different definitions of “U.S. leadership”
and “defending our values” than those articulated by Paul. For Cruz, these
must be euphemisms for “imperialism” and “interventionism.”
If Cruz’s familial associations—Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, W, CFR— are any
indication, then I think we know the answer. I suspect there is, therefore,
some truth in Infowar.com’s conclusion:
Like the domestication of the Tea Party and the expulsion of its more purist
liberty-minded activists, the Cruz the warrior pitted against the
establishment motif is another slick subversion directed at the political
elite’s most puissant opposition – the real Tea Party and a threatening
number of patriot activists gnawing at the edges of the political
establishment.
6. If Cruz gets more prominent for the 2016 primary, I suspect there will be
an attempt to scrub these associations.
UPDATE: Paul fires back:
Many forget today that Reagan’s decision to meet with Mikhail Gorbachev
was harshly criticized by the Republican hawks of his time, some of whom
would even call Reagan an appeaser. In the Middle East, Reagan
strategically pulled back our forces after the tragedy in Lebanon in 1983
that killed 241 Marines, realizing the cost of American lives was too great
for the mission.
Without a clearly defined mission, exit strategy or acceptable rationale for
risking soldiers lives, Reagan possessed the leadership to reassess and
readjust.
Today, we forget that some of the Republican hawks of his time criticized
Reagan harshly for this too, again, calling him an appeaser. . . .
How many leaders were as great as Reagan, willing to admit their mistakes,
learn from them and put their country before their own reputation and
legacy?
Today’s Republicans should concentrate on establishing their own identities
and agendas, as opposed to simply latching onto Ronald Reagan’s legacy—
or worse, misrepresenting it.
Source AmericanVision
Related Posts
Mystery of the Knights Templars
BUT, can the Govt Really Steal our personal savings fom our bank, 401K, homes, safe
deposit boxes - See Executive Order 6102
US CORPORATE DESTROYERS URGING NEXT FASCIST FAST TRACK
ATTACK 0N AMERICA
Cancer and other Cures Frustrated by Rockefellers and the FDA *vid*
Inside “Gamechanger Salon,” The Left’s Action Network