This document presents a comparative analysis of GIS education between practitioners and educators. It shows that while both groups rank concepts like problem solving, spatial thinking, and communicating results as very important, educators place slightly less emphasis on workforce culture skills. Additionally, practitioners view learning software as more important than educators. The document uses charts to compare how each group ranked the importance of various GIS skills and concepts.
Presentation by Ross McMillan based on a survey of senior leadership in Division of Students at York University. Along with findings, survey points to future direc
Presentation by Ross McMillan based on a survey of senior leadership in Division of Students at York University. Along with findings, survey points to future direc
B2 b content marketing 2013 trends & benchmarkRegina Antony
The biggest challenge marketers will face in the year 2013 will be creating enough content vs. last year where the biggest challenge was creating engaging content.
Over 50,000 Canadian professionals spend at least 50% of their work time on sustainability-related tasks.
Find out what it takes to become one of them in this vital report on the latest sustainability job trends in Canada.
This research covers everything a potential sustainability professional needs to know - from top sustainability employers to key required competencies and average starting salaries.
Learner Motivation and Effectiveness of a Quest-Based Learning GIS CourseMichael DeMers
Through review of individual questions (assignments) in a Quest-Based GIS course, I will ascertain the degree to which each provides a "satisfactory" learning experience as viewed by the learners. A final survey will evaluate learner overall satisfaction. I will also monitor time-on-task, pacing, and timing of quests, selection of optional quests, textual analysis of answers, and other course-related statistics and correlate them to final grades.
Exploring Abandoned GIS Research to Augment Applied Geography EducationMichael DeMers
Applied geography has enjoyed a resurgence since the increased availabilty of geospatial software and the advancement of an ever-increasing sophistication of these analytical tools designed to solve complex geospatial problems. These advancements have quickly been translated into coursework at colleges and universities – often adopted wholesale into complete applied geography programs throughout academia. One unintended consequence of this adoption is that much of the conceptual content responsible for the development of these tools is not covered in the applied geography coursework. In many cases the conceptual frameworks were chosen more out of expediency rather than geographical foundations, thus leaving the applied geography student with the misconception that the fundamental geographic underpinnings upon which the software is based, are thoroughly understood and extensively tested. A direct result of this is that students in applied geography programs often employ the tools with little or no understanding of their limitations for modeling real geographic processes. I propose that one aspect of an applied geography curriculum must include the study of the underlying principles upon which the software is based, and perhaps more importantly, the study of concepts that were abandoned in the early days of tool development. While this is obvious for programs that emphasize the more theoretical aspects of geography, I argue that it is equally important for those who use the tools so they are aware of the fundamental limitations of the results derived from analysis.
10. Problem Solving
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
Practitioners
Educators
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Not at all Important Very Unimportant Somewhat Neither Important Somewhat Very Important Extremely
Unimportant nor Unimportant Important Important
11. Spatial Thinking
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
Practitioners
Educators
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Not at all Important Very Unimportant Somewhat Neither Important Somewhat Very Important Extremely
Unimportant nor Unimportant Important Important
12. Communicating Results
50.00%
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
Practitioners
Educators
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Not at all Important Very Unimportant Somewhat Neither Important Somewhat Very Important Extremely
Unimportant nor Unimportant Important Important
13. Workforce Culture
45.00%
40.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
Practitioners
20.00% Educators
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Not at all Important Very Unimportant Somewhat Neither Important Somewhat Very Important Extremely
Unimportant nor Unimportant Important Important
14. Learning the Software
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
Practitioner
Educator
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Not at all Important Very Unimportant Somewhat Neither Important Somewhat Very Important Extremely
Unimportant nor Unimportant Important Important