Project : “Field testing of an innovative solar powered
milk cooling solution for the higher efficiency of the
dairy subsector in Tunisia”
Closing workshop
Gender in dairy production and perception
of the milk cooling system
The Expected Outputs
Outputs
Gender Indicators:
Developed for the project
that could be used to
track the its performance
on gender issues.
Strategic
Interventions:
Identified &
Recommended for both
Project team and
Stakeholders
Methodology
Bibliography (National and international level)
Baseline survey (Gender aspects)
Questionnaire addressed to men, women and youth
(target farmers)
Questionnaire addressed to:
1. Milk collectors
2. Milk collection centres
3. Individual surveys for the targeted farmers
Farmers’ Identification
Farmers’ Socio-economic Characterisation
Farmer1 Farmer 2 Farmer 3 Farmer 4 Farmer 5 Farmer 6 Farmer 7
Sex Man Man Man Man Man Man Woman
Age (Years) 38 40 40 63 60 47 47
Civil status Married Married Married Married Married Married Widowed
Education level Primary
school
College Primary
school
College Primary
school
College Primary
school
Dairy
production
experience
9 years 10 years 20 years 2 years 20 years 10 years 20 years
Family size 5 6 6 5 7 6 3
Own area (Ha) 1 6 6 7 5 1,5 6
Number of
milking cows
10 8 10 11 12 5 14
Share
Agr+lLiv/ Total
income
90% 80% 100% 50% 60% 40% 100%
Access to credit Yes No No No Yes Yes No
Gender Issues
Assets' ownership
The field surveys has shown clearly that almost all the
family assets are owned by the men i.e the household
head, and in some cases women and youth could have the
right to own some assets.
The livestock is in reality a common property of the whole
family due to the important interventions of each member
in this activity. The vehicles are considered as the man's
unique property.
Assets' ownership
Village Name Men Women Joint
Zitouna (N=32) 75% 13% 12%
Etwila (N=30) 93% 4% 3%
Zefzef (N=29) 93% 7% 0%
Elweara (N=30) 97% 3% 0%
Total (N=121) 89% 7% 4%
Milking cows ownership by gender (%)
80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
Heifers bull and calf (N=113)
Sheep (N=46)
Goats (N=8)
Bee Hives (N=4)
92%
92%
88%
100%
4%
4%
4%
4%
12%
Men Women Joint
Ownership of livestock other than milking cows
Analysis of Access to / Control over the productive resources
Briefly about the women's situation
•Lack of access to assets and resources which evolves in a self-
perpetuating cycle
•They are facing hard challenges to make their voices heard, to have
access to credit, knowledge, and eventually to invest in new
technologies
The Gender’s inclusion indicator illustrates that there’s lack of
inclusion in both Zitouna & Hania
There is gender blindness : “If women had the same access to
productive resources as men, they could increase yields on their
farms by 20–30 %. This could raise total agricultural output in
developing countries by 2.5–4 %, which could in turn reduce the
number of hungry people in the world by 12–17 %” (FAO, The state
of food and agriculture, 2010-2011, page 5)
Technology and practice review
This tool measures the degree of adoption of a new
technology by a community in a very specific social
context. And since the people in the experiment
happens to be the leaders of this same community
especially in terms of dairy production the results can
be projected onto the entire community.
The following table is a summary of the answers
given by the interviewees
Technology and practice review
Men (Household Head) Women (Spouses) Youth (Children)
Description of the
technology
It's a group of solar panels connected
to cooling units that produce ice cubes
to cool the milk during its journey to
the collecting center
it is a fridge that makes
ice cubes to cool the
milk after milking it to
reduce the losses
especially in the
summer season
the idea is to cool the
milk using solar
energy.
Date of its introduction 2016 2016 2016/2017
By whom / what OEP/ICARDA/GIZ... The government Do not know exactly
How was it introduced or
adapted?
Chosen from a group of breeders in
the region who have the best milk
production characteristics
Do not know it just
happened
Do not know
Who made the decision
to adopt the technology
The household head (myself) The household head
(my husband)
The household head
(my father)
Who uses the technology
and who controls its’ use
All family members who knows its
functioning
My husband and I, and
sometimes the children
if they are available
My parents in general.
Who benefits from the
new technology
No clear benefit so far There is no benefit
only hard times every
morning.
Do not know
The impact on agricultural
production
No changes since the
experience is conducted
on small level
Milking the cows takes
twice longer than
usual.
Do not know
The impact on intra-household
division of labor
The man has to be
involved in the milking
procedure because of its
delicacy.
The man is back in the
milking activity
Everything mixed up
between the parents;
the available person do
the job
The impact on the livelihoods, food
security and well-being in
the community?
No impact so far No impact No impact
Estimate the number of households
in the community using the
technology
Five persons including me Five persons including
me
Do not know
Discuss why other households in
the community do not use the
technology.
Because they were not
chosen to be part of this
experience
Do not know Do not know
Have any technologies or practices
been introduced but failed
No No No
Technology and practice review
Analysis of Access and control of technology
Technology’s introduction was the choice of the male
In 90% of the interviewed cases, there has been a discussion before
the introduction like an informative way to deal with it
All the women had an easy access to the technology, but only 40%
of them were controlling it (in case of widow and in case of male
absence).
=> It was stereotyped that women rarely use machinery due to
“women’s inadequate education, timidity to use machinery and
traditional pattern”.
Objective
To identify the level of women’s involvement in decision making
over productive resources
Analysis of Decision making processes in the HH
Women’s level of education under the age of 37
years old (3 interviewed women)
Women’s level of education
above the of the age of 55
years old (1 interviewed
woman)
More involved in decision-making
Women do not have much to say in the financial
decisions, but they do take care of the day-to-
day decisions, their opinions is as a consultative
and advisory.
Not involved in decision-
making
The decision-making about new technologies depend also on
the women profile: Age &Education Level
There’s a Gender’s generation gap
Perception of the innovative technology by gender
(score)
0 1 2 3 4 5
Milk is better when it’s cooled
It Increases the milk consumption on-farm
It Increases the processing of milk
Time dedicated to labor reduced
Feeling of stress reduced
Flexibility in organizing their labor time
Milk rejection reduced
Possibilities for multiple uses of this extra cooling space
Improve the relationship with mobile milk collectors
Improve milk quality
Generate more income
Good impact of the innovative technology among your
neighbors
4.8
3.0
3.2
2.0
1.8
2.7
4.3
4.5
3.0
4.7
2.2
3.7
4.8
2.2
3.2
3.0
3.0
4.0
4.5
4.5
2.7
4.0
2.0
3.3
4.4
4
3
3.6
2
2.6
4
4.2
3.2
4.4
3
3.6
Me
Me
Me
Analysis of Gender Changing Roles
Objectives
To establish gender
roles in livestock
production particularly
for dairy production and
management
To capture changes in
the gender roles as a
result of the project
Analysis of Gender Changing Roles
To highlight the changes within the households
participating in this innovative experience we conducted a
field survey where women, men, and youth were
interviewed separately by a mal and a female enumerators
to minimize any kind of influence between the two sides
especially from men.
The field surveys were made according to the
methodology adopted by:
 "Toolkit for Gender Analysis of Crop and Livestock
Production, Technologies and Service Provision" (Clare
Bishop-Sambrook/Ranjitha Puskur, 2007).
Harvard Analytical Framework (Gender Roles
Framework)
Gender division of labor
Men (Household Head) Women (Spouses) Youth (Children)
Before After Before After Before After
Breeding The same as before only women takes
care of it
The same The same
Rearing The same The women are responsible of it as
before
The same
Housing The same This activity is specific to all the
females of the HH
The same
Grazing, tethering The available member is responsible of taking care of this activity, the new technology has no effect on it.
Fodder
production
Women are
responsible
Now the men and
the youth have to
feed the cattle when
the women are busy
milking the cows
Women's
responsibility
Everyone
responsibility
due the extra
time of milking
and preparing
the cans...
Parents
responsibility
If the parents
have some issues
during the
milking process
we have to feed
the cattle.
Fodder
Collection/ buying
fodder
The same, men are responsible of
purchasing the fodder
The same The same
Collecting dung Women's duty The same The same
Watering &
Medication
The same
Gender division of labor
Men (Household Head) Women (Spouses) Youth (Children)
Before After Before After Before After
Feeding Only women were responsible of this activity. But now, everyone have to participate to alleviate the burden
on women
Milking Only women were responsible of this activity, but now the household head and his spouse has to cooperate
to complete this task now twice as long as usual before the arrival of the milk collector.
This activity is the most exhausting one, stressful and consumes much more time than usual
Making butter The same A women's activity The same
Slaughtering Men a responsible of slaughtering
any type of animals
The same The same
Storing This activity is done by all the family members, because it is not so frequent.
Day to day
management
Introducing a new technology has
no direct effect on managing the
livestock, because the rush hours
happens to be only the morning.
The same The same
Impact on
production if key
adult in HH ill or
dies
 Wife ill/dies:
 Husband ill/dies:
If anyone of the two active members of the household happens to be unavailable the other one will replace
him.
Gender division of labor
Briefly
1. Before the technology : Women were doing almost
everything from housekeeping to livestock production.
Men in the other side are responsible of ensuring off-
farming income, and all necessary outputs for both the
house and the farm.
2. After the technology : Men has become more involved
in the breeding activities due to the nature of the new
technology which demands more knowledge and
physical strength.
Gender’s indicator : Reduce of women’s work
burden which may allow them to participate in other
economic activities available to them
Analysis of Gender based constraints
Objective
To identify any existing gender based constraints so that
women, men and youth could not effectively involve in the
project and contribute effectively and share the benefit
About “Access control of technology “:
60% of women were under-esteeming themselves and not have
full confidence about their capacities to handle such new
technology
Work to build new capacities :
Hard skills (technical training about the use,
technology, etc…)
Soft skills (leadership, self-confidence, raise awareness
about their crucial roles in the success of the technology
…etc.)
Analysis of Gender based constraints
About budget time of daily women activity:
Women schedule is from “3 / 4 am to 7 /8 pm with a break of 1 or2
hour”
In all the cases women are involved in home-based production
as well as agricultural production
The technology contributes to reduce the stress about the
time’s milking and milk’s quality
It gives women extra time to spend with their children
(helping them in school’s homework, and taking care of
them..etc.)
The more suitable equipments used as new technologies the
less stress they feel.
Analysis of Gender based constraints
About the role distribution in HH:
-The gender gap is consistent in all crucial activities: agricultural
input and services, land, livestock, market and marketing
services.
- The women role is invisible and even if she might perform some
agricultural tasks considered as male (case of a widow)
-Men have a financial authority over women , which makes their
mobility limited.
Women’s work is home-based and unrecorded, all of them
are deprived of any social security.
Analysis of Gender based opportunities
Social Empowerment:
since women are now enjoying more free time, because of the
increase of male intervention; this will eventually help her to:
Dedicate more time for herself and for her children
 Having more flexibility in managing her schedule
Enjoying some entertainment activities
Economic empowerment:
This form of empowerment will eventually takes place if the farmers
will benefit directly from a quality premium which will generate
more income for the HH.
Women will have the right to control this benefits if only they can get
rid of the social chains that hinders them.
Gender relations between producers and
collectors
Milk collectors:
-All the milk collectors are men with an average of 35 years old , 50%
of them are younger than 30 years old.
Indicators :
•Creation of job opportunity for jobless youth
•Change in number and composition of collectors
Gender relations between producers and
collectors
Relationship between women and collectors:
Women in this case doesn’t face any problem to deal as a producer
with the collectors not because she is empowered or the absence of
norms and traditions but because there is a family relationship
between them.
This may reveal the incapacity of women to deal with other
collector not belonging to the family
 Weakness and absence of self-confidence
In the major cases, milk collectors prefers to deal with women rather
than men, the main reason are:
-Accurate Delivery time (83.3%)
- Hygiene (70%)
- A better milk handling (69.9%)
Indicator : changes in composition of milk
suppliers
Gender indicators at the collecting centers
level
Staff structure of 14 collection centres
Men
Number %
Engineers 3 4%
Technicians 12 17%
Master
degrees 11 15%
Worker 21 30%
Driver 24 34%
Total 71 100%
Women
Number %
engineers 2 3%
Technicians 3 4%
Master
degrees 7 10%
Worker 54 81%
Driver 1 1%
Total 67 100%
Indicator : Change in staff composition and
number
Strategic action plan
To ensure women farmers and their needs are integrated into extension
and knowledge transfer it is recommended to:
- Develop a knowledge transfer strategy that includes all stakeholders
and partners in the sector and clarifies their role. This includes the
governmental extension services in the Ministries of Agriculture, the
private sector, the Agricultural Unions, Associations and Cooperatives as
well as Civil Society Organizations.
- Design extension programs based on the needs of the different
categories of female and male farmers (not only male head of
households) and involve local independent female farmers, into the
design of extension messages and approaches.
Strategic action plan
-With the needs of female farmers identified, appropriate extension
messages for women farmers can be developed that include technical
input and information, training on agricultural machinery, and
especially access to labour-saving devices.
- Independent female famers can serve as role models for rural
women. Extension services should establish strategic partnerships
with these farmers to reach out to female famers in their community
and beyond. Extension services could broaden their scope and
provide extra support to women farmers in their role as knowledge
transfer agents. Support could include assistance to attend
conferences and field demonstrations, provision of up-to-date
research know-how, market linkages and participation in strategic
planning meetings and policy formulation in the agricultural sector.
Strategic action plan
-Development initiatives should combine increase in agriculture
productivity band an income diversification for small farmers and
rural women. This implies technical support through extension,
linkage to micro-credit providers, capacity building in
entrepreneurship skills, processing, marketing and access to non-
agricultural sources of income.
- Movement beyond gender stereotypes of women farmers as
helpers and housekeepers and identify women farmer’s needs. All
three categories of women farmers have clear needs for agricultural
input, machinery and know-how that go well beyond food
processing and home production. For this paradigm shift to happen,
the needs of women farmers must be identified and made visible.
This can happen in agricultural research and in the planning phase
of annual extension plans.
Addressing Gender Issues to enhance adoption of the innovative solar powered milk cooling solution for the higher efficiency of the dairy subsector in Tunisia

Addressing Gender Issues to enhance adoption of the innovative solar powered milk cooling solution for the higher efficiency of the dairy subsector in Tunisia

  • 1.
    Project : “Fieldtesting of an innovative solar powered milk cooling solution for the higher efficiency of the dairy subsector in Tunisia” Closing workshop Gender in dairy production and perception of the milk cooling system
  • 2.
    The Expected Outputs Outputs GenderIndicators: Developed for the project that could be used to track the its performance on gender issues. Strategic Interventions: Identified & Recommended for both Project team and Stakeholders
  • 3.
    Methodology Bibliography (National andinternational level) Baseline survey (Gender aspects) Questionnaire addressed to men, women and youth (target farmers) Questionnaire addressed to: 1. Milk collectors 2. Milk collection centres 3. Individual surveys for the targeted farmers
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Farmers’ Socio-economic Characterisation Farmer1Farmer 2 Farmer 3 Farmer 4 Farmer 5 Farmer 6 Farmer 7 Sex Man Man Man Man Man Man Woman Age (Years) 38 40 40 63 60 47 47 Civil status Married Married Married Married Married Married Widowed Education level Primary school College Primary school College Primary school College Primary school Dairy production experience 9 years 10 years 20 years 2 years 20 years 10 years 20 years Family size 5 6 6 5 7 6 3 Own area (Ha) 1 6 6 7 5 1,5 6 Number of milking cows 10 8 10 11 12 5 14 Share Agr+lLiv/ Total income 90% 80% 100% 50% 60% 40% 100% Access to credit Yes No No No Yes Yes No
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Assets' ownership The fieldsurveys has shown clearly that almost all the family assets are owned by the men i.e the household head, and in some cases women and youth could have the right to own some assets. The livestock is in reality a common property of the whole family due to the important interventions of each member in this activity. The vehicles are considered as the man's unique property.
  • 8.
    Assets' ownership Village NameMen Women Joint Zitouna (N=32) 75% 13% 12% Etwila (N=30) 93% 4% 3% Zefzef (N=29) 93% 7% 0% Elweara (N=30) 97% 3% 0% Total (N=121) 89% 7% 4% Milking cows ownership by gender (%) 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% Heifers bull and calf (N=113) Sheep (N=46) Goats (N=8) Bee Hives (N=4) 92% 92% 88% 100% 4% 4% 4% 4% 12% Men Women Joint Ownership of livestock other than milking cows
  • 9.
    Analysis of Accessto / Control over the productive resources Briefly about the women's situation •Lack of access to assets and resources which evolves in a self- perpetuating cycle •They are facing hard challenges to make their voices heard, to have access to credit, knowledge, and eventually to invest in new technologies The Gender’s inclusion indicator illustrates that there’s lack of inclusion in both Zitouna & Hania There is gender blindness : “If women had the same access to productive resources as men, they could increase yields on their farms by 20–30 %. This could raise total agricultural output in developing countries by 2.5–4 %, which could in turn reduce the number of hungry people in the world by 12–17 %” (FAO, The state of food and agriculture, 2010-2011, page 5)
  • 10.
    Technology and practicereview This tool measures the degree of adoption of a new technology by a community in a very specific social context. And since the people in the experiment happens to be the leaders of this same community especially in terms of dairy production the results can be projected onto the entire community. The following table is a summary of the answers given by the interviewees
  • 11.
    Technology and practicereview Men (Household Head) Women (Spouses) Youth (Children) Description of the technology It's a group of solar panels connected to cooling units that produce ice cubes to cool the milk during its journey to the collecting center it is a fridge that makes ice cubes to cool the milk after milking it to reduce the losses especially in the summer season the idea is to cool the milk using solar energy. Date of its introduction 2016 2016 2016/2017 By whom / what OEP/ICARDA/GIZ... The government Do not know exactly How was it introduced or adapted? Chosen from a group of breeders in the region who have the best milk production characteristics Do not know it just happened Do not know Who made the decision to adopt the technology The household head (myself) The household head (my husband) The household head (my father) Who uses the technology and who controls its’ use All family members who knows its functioning My husband and I, and sometimes the children if they are available My parents in general. Who benefits from the new technology No clear benefit so far There is no benefit only hard times every morning. Do not know
  • 12.
    The impact onagricultural production No changes since the experience is conducted on small level Milking the cows takes twice longer than usual. Do not know The impact on intra-household division of labor The man has to be involved in the milking procedure because of its delicacy. The man is back in the milking activity Everything mixed up between the parents; the available person do the job The impact on the livelihoods, food security and well-being in the community? No impact so far No impact No impact Estimate the number of households in the community using the technology Five persons including me Five persons including me Do not know Discuss why other households in the community do not use the technology. Because they were not chosen to be part of this experience Do not know Do not know Have any technologies or practices been introduced but failed No No No Technology and practice review
  • 13.
    Analysis of Accessand control of technology Technology’s introduction was the choice of the male In 90% of the interviewed cases, there has been a discussion before the introduction like an informative way to deal with it All the women had an easy access to the technology, but only 40% of them were controlling it (in case of widow and in case of male absence). => It was stereotyped that women rarely use machinery due to “women’s inadequate education, timidity to use machinery and traditional pattern”.
  • 14.
    Objective To identify thelevel of women’s involvement in decision making over productive resources Analysis of Decision making processes in the HH Women’s level of education under the age of 37 years old (3 interviewed women) Women’s level of education above the of the age of 55 years old (1 interviewed woman) More involved in decision-making Women do not have much to say in the financial decisions, but they do take care of the day-to- day decisions, their opinions is as a consultative and advisory. Not involved in decision- making The decision-making about new technologies depend also on the women profile: Age &Education Level There’s a Gender’s generation gap
  • 15.
    Perception of theinnovative technology by gender (score) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Milk is better when it’s cooled It Increases the milk consumption on-farm It Increases the processing of milk Time dedicated to labor reduced Feeling of stress reduced Flexibility in organizing their labor time Milk rejection reduced Possibilities for multiple uses of this extra cooling space Improve the relationship with mobile milk collectors Improve milk quality Generate more income Good impact of the innovative technology among your neighbors 4.8 3.0 3.2 2.0 1.8 2.7 4.3 4.5 3.0 4.7 2.2 3.7 4.8 2.2 3.2 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 2.7 4.0 2.0 3.3 4.4 4 3 3.6 2 2.6 4 4.2 3.2 4.4 3 3.6 Me Me Me
  • 16.
    Analysis of GenderChanging Roles Objectives To establish gender roles in livestock production particularly for dairy production and management To capture changes in the gender roles as a result of the project
  • 17.
    Analysis of GenderChanging Roles To highlight the changes within the households participating in this innovative experience we conducted a field survey where women, men, and youth were interviewed separately by a mal and a female enumerators to minimize any kind of influence between the two sides especially from men. The field surveys were made according to the methodology adopted by:  "Toolkit for Gender Analysis of Crop and Livestock Production, Technologies and Service Provision" (Clare Bishop-Sambrook/Ranjitha Puskur, 2007). Harvard Analytical Framework (Gender Roles Framework)
  • 18.
    Gender division oflabor Men (Household Head) Women (Spouses) Youth (Children) Before After Before After Before After Breeding The same as before only women takes care of it The same The same Rearing The same The women are responsible of it as before The same Housing The same This activity is specific to all the females of the HH The same Grazing, tethering The available member is responsible of taking care of this activity, the new technology has no effect on it. Fodder production Women are responsible Now the men and the youth have to feed the cattle when the women are busy milking the cows Women's responsibility Everyone responsibility due the extra time of milking and preparing the cans... Parents responsibility If the parents have some issues during the milking process we have to feed the cattle. Fodder Collection/ buying fodder The same, men are responsible of purchasing the fodder The same The same Collecting dung Women's duty The same The same Watering & Medication The same
  • 19.
    Gender division oflabor Men (Household Head) Women (Spouses) Youth (Children) Before After Before After Before After Feeding Only women were responsible of this activity. But now, everyone have to participate to alleviate the burden on women Milking Only women were responsible of this activity, but now the household head and his spouse has to cooperate to complete this task now twice as long as usual before the arrival of the milk collector. This activity is the most exhausting one, stressful and consumes much more time than usual Making butter The same A women's activity The same Slaughtering Men a responsible of slaughtering any type of animals The same The same Storing This activity is done by all the family members, because it is not so frequent. Day to day management Introducing a new technology has no direct effect on managing the livestock, because the rush hours happens to be only the morning. The same The same Impact on production if key adult in HH ill or dies  Wife ill/dies:  Husband ill/dies: If anyone of the two active members of the household happens to be unavailable the other one will replace him.
  • 20.
    Gender division oflabor Briefly 1. Before the technology : Women were doing almost everything from housekeeping to livestock production. Men in the other side are responsible of ensuring off- farming income, and all necessary outputs for both the house and the farm. 2. After the technology : Men has become more involved in the breeding activities due to the nature of the new technology which demands more knowledge and physical strength. Gender’s indicator : Reduce of women’s work burden which may allow them to participate in other economic activities available to them
  • 21.
    Analysis of Genderbased constraints Objective To identify any existing gender based constraints so that women, men and youth could not effectively involve in the project and contribute effectively and share the benefit About “Access control of technology “: 60% of women were under-esteeming themselves and not have full confidence about their capacities to handle such new technology Work to build new capacities : Hard skills (technical training about the use, technology, etc…) Soft skills (leadership, self-confidence, raise awareness about their crucial roles in the success of the technology …etc.)
  • 22.
    Analysis of Genderbased constraints About budget time of daily women activity: Women schedule is from “3 / 4 am to 7 /8 pm with a break of 1 or2 hour” In all the cases women are involved in home-based production as well as agricultural production The technology contributes to reduce the stress about the time’s milking and milk’s quality It gives women extra time to spend with their children (helping them in school’s homework, and taking care of them..etc.) The more suitable equipments used as new technologies the less stress they feel.
  • 23.
    Analysis of Genderbased constraints About the role distribution in HH: -The gender gap is consistent in all crucial activities: agricultural input and services, land, livestock, market and marketing services. - The women role is invisible and even if she might perform some agricultural tasks considered as male (case of a widow) -Men have a financial authority over women , which makes their mobility limited. Women’s work is home-based and unrecorded, all of them are deprived of any social security.
  • 24.
    Analysis of Genderbased opportunities Social Empowerment: since women are now enjoying more free time, because of the increase of male intervention; this will eventually help her to: Dedicate more time for herself and for her children  Having more flexibility in managing her schedule Enjoying some entertainment activities Economic empowerment: This form of empowerment will eventually takes place if the farmers will benefit directly from a quality premium which will generate more income for the HH. Women will have the right to control this benefits if only they can get rid of the social chains that hinders them.
  • 25.
    Gender relations betweenproducers and collectors Milk collectors: -All the milk collectors are men with an average of 35 years old , 50% of them are younger than 30 years old. Indicators : •Creation of job opportunity for jobless youth •Change in number and composition of collectors
  • 26.
    Gender relations betweenproducers and collectors Relationship between women and collectors: Women in this case doesn’t face any problem to deal as a producer with the collectors not because she is empowered or the absence of norms and traditions but because there is a family relationship between them. This may reveal the incapacity of women to deal with other collector not belonging to the family  Weakness and absence of self-confidence In the major cases, milk collectors prefers to deal with women rather than men, the main reason are: -Accurate Delivery time (83.3%) - Hygiene (70%) - A better milk handling (69.9%) Indicator : changes in composition of milk suppliers
  • 27.
    Gender indicators atthe collecting centers level Staff structure of 14 collection centres Men Number % Engineers 3 4% Technicians 12 17% Master degrees 11 15% Worker 21 30% Driver 24 34% Total 71 100% Women Number % engineers 2 3% Technicians 3 4% Master degrees 7 10% Worker 54 81% Driver 1 1% Total 67 100% Indicator : Change in staff composition and number
  • 28.
    Strategic action plan Toensure women farmers and their needs are integrated into extension and knowledge transfer it is recommended to: - Develop a knowledge transfer strategy that includes all stakeholders and partners in the sector and clarifies their role. This includes the governmental extension services in the Ministries of Agriculture, the private sector, the Agricultural Unions, Associations and Cooperatives as well as Civil Society Organizations. - Design extension programs based on the needs of the different categories of female and male farmers (not only male head of households) and involve local independent female farmers, into the design of extension messages and approaches.
  • 29.
    Strategic action plan -Withthe needs of female farmers identified, appropriate extension messages for women farmers can be developed that include technical input and information, training on agricultural machinery, and especially access to labour-saving devices. - Independent female famers can serve as role models for rural women. Extension services should establish strategic partnerships with these farmers to reach out to female famers in their community and beyond. Extension services could broaden their scope and provide extra support to women farmers in their role as knowledge transfer agents. Support could include assistance to attend conferences and field demonstrations, provision of up-to-date research know-how, market linkages and participation in strategic planning meetings and policy formulation in the agricultural sector.
  • 30.
    Strategic action plan -Developmentinitiatives should combine increase in agriculture productivity band an income diversification for small farmers and rural women. This implies technical support through extension, linkage to micro-credit providers, capacity building in entrepreneurship skills, processing, marketing and access to non- agricultural sources of income. - Movement beyond gender stereotypes of women farmers as helpers and housekeepers and identify women farmer’s needs. All three categories of women farmers have clear needs for agricultural input, machinery and know-how that go well beyond food processing and home production. For this paradigm shift to happen, the needs of women farmers must be identified and made visible. This can happen in agricultural research and in the planning phase of annual extension plans.