This document outlines strategies for engaging students in academic writing assignments. It discusses using a gradual release model with four stages: developing topic knowledge, modeling genres, interactive writing, and independent writing. One strategy presented is "simultaneous round table," where students write responses to a question and pass their paper to add comments. Another strategy is "wallpapering," where students write pros and cons of a topic and post them for comments. The document aims to help participants develop writing skills through engaging oral language activities before writing independently.
Introduction to Writing to argue - using similar ideas to question formulation technique and transcript of One Direction Comic Relief Campaign to analyse.
Detailed Lesson Plan (Reading and Writing) Techniques in Critical ReadingAnjenette Columnas
This is a lesson plan that was collaboratively made with my fellow student interns during our internship days. It is about the techniques in critical reading and tips on how to distinguish and be a critical reader. Enjoy!
Introduction to Writing to argue - using similar ideas to question formulation technique and transcript of One Direction Comic Relief Campaign to analyse.
Detailed Lesson Plan (Reading and Writing) Techniques in Critical ReadingAnjenette Columnas
This is a lesson plan that was collaboratively made with my fellow student interns during our internship days. It is about the techniques in critical reading and tips on how to distinguish and be a critical reader. Enjoy!
Ritt241 How to Write a Discussion Board Post Writing.docxdaniely50
Ritt/241
How to Write a Discussion Board Post
“Writing is thinking on paper.”
–William Zinsser
Discussion boards (or DBs) are a chance for you to confer with your colleagues outside of class
time. You will be assigned 3 DB posts in each genre, often concentrated around the beginning of
our discussion of the genre.
How to access the discussion board:
1. Login to Brightspace (brightspace.ccc.edu)
2. Enter our course site, and click “content” in the top menu bar.
3. In the “table of contents” menu at left, click “discussion boards”.
4. Each DB assignment will have its own forum. Find the name of the main discussion
board thread you want to post under and click on it to open that discussion board
assignment. Review the directions there.
5. To make your own post inside the assignment thread, click “start a new thread” (below
directions). Give your post a subject line that includes your name. Then enter your
response into the text box. When you are finished, click “post”.
6. To reply to someone else’s thread, click on their subject line to open their thread. Under
their content, click “reply” to answer their post.
Writing your discussion board post:
First, read the text! You may wish to read more than once, first as you usually would and
the second time as a writer, looking for clues as to how the story works.
Refer to the list of “things to consider” included in this handout (next page) as you
choose one interesting feature of the writing to focus on in your post. In addition to
those ideas, you are welcome to explore any other features of the writing that you notice.
o Our goal is to think about how and why the writing works. Why might the writer
have made the choices that s/he makes here? What purpose might this choice
serve in the story? Look for evidence in the writing to back up your claims, and
include at least one direct reference to the reading in your post.
o You don’t have to have all the answers; I’m just asking for your insight as a reader.
Any opinion you can justify with evidence from the text is valid.
Make direct reference to the reading at least once.
o This means either using a quote which illustrates your point or including a
paraphrase-style reference, in your own words, to a specific part of the reading.
o Any use of quoted material must be in “quotation marks”.
o Don’t forget to give credit to the author of the quote! When mentioning authors,
use their full names or last names only. (If you’re responding to “Three Pokes of a
Thistle”, for example, you can attribute your quote to Naomi Shihab Nye or Nye,
but don’t call her just “Naomi”).
Ritt/241
Examples of things to consider:
The author’s voice/tone (as evident in the piece)
The choice to use a stylistic device (e.g. use of segments, fantastical elements,
descriptive passages, etc—stick with something you’re comfortable observing here)
Sentence rhythms or punctuation choic.
1. No More Boring Writing Assignments:
Engaging Strategies for
Academic Writing
Carla Huck and Beth Amaral
SIOP Instructional Coaches
Danbury High School
April 2015
4. Objectives
Content:
Participants will utilize four effective strategies for
developing academic writing skills through engaging
activities.
Language:
Participants will be able to scaffold assignments in
their classrooms with oral language development as a
precursor to writing.
4
5. Gradual Release for Writing
Stage 1: Developing Knowledge of the Topic
Stage 2: Modeling the Genre (Mentor Texts)
Stage 3: Interactive Writing
Stage 4: Independent Writing
Source: Gibbons, P. Scaffolding EL learners to be successful
writers.
6. Quote:
“The idea that ‘you learn to write by writing’ is well
and good for English–only students who need only
to practice their writing skills to become better
writers. However, this maxim is not helpful in
describing the task for many English Language
Learners. . . In this case, more writing is not the
solution. Research suggests that more talking - oral
language development - is the prerequisite to
developing strong writing skills.”
(Williams, Stathis, and Gotsch, 2009, pg. 21)
7. Activity #1: Simultaneous Round Table
In groups of 4, respond in writing to the
following question:
Describe a successful writing activity that you have
done with your students.
8. Activity #1: Simultaneous Round Table
1. Write a response on your own paper. ( 2-3
minutes)
2. Pass your paper clockwise so each teammate can
add to, fortify or ask for clarification for the prior
responses.
*Use Sentence Starters for Responding in
Discussions for reference.
3. After 3 rotations, teammates either discuss/
debrief each others’ comments (additional 3- 5
minutes) or read them silently to themselves.
8
9. 9
Agreeing
● I agree with ....
● …...has convinced me that … because ....
● I couldn’t have said that better! ..explained ….
perfectly!
● ….. has made a good point. I agree that …
Disagreeing
● I’d like to respectfully disagree because …..
● While I agree with …., I’d like to discuss ….
more.
● I don’t share that opinion because ....
● That’s interesting, but …
Adding to
● In addition to what …. said, ….
● Can I add to that? _________.
● I would like to piggyback on what …. said by
adding ….
● You are right. To continue that thought,...
Clarifying
● In other words, you are saying….
● I think it means….
● I understand the part about…. but I want to
know….
● More specifically, it is…. because…
Fortifying
● For example,...
● One case that illustrates this is…
● In the text it said that…
● Strong supporting evidence is….
Creating
● I noticed the pattern of…
● That reminds me of …
● I think it depends on…
● One idea could be...
Sentence Starters for Responding in Discussion
11. Activity #2: Wallpapering
1. Discuss with a partner:
•ADVANTAGES of using the Internet
•DISADVANTAGES of using the Internet
2. Write with your partner:
•one sentence about the ADVANTAGES of using
the Internet
•one sentence about the DISADVANTAGES of
using the Internet
3. Post your papers on the wall.
11
13. Activity #2: Wallpapering
4. Go around, read and evaluate one another’s
ideas.
5. Write comments on at least three sentences (for
example, something you didn’t know, something
you hadn’t considered, an idea you agree with).
6. Later, we will discuss your activity as a class.
7. Each writer will have an opportunity to comment.
13
16. Activity #3: The Last Word
1. Read the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”
by Nicholas Carr.
2. Underline one sentence about an advantage that
is significant to you.
3. Underline one sentence about a disadvantage
that is significant to you.
16
18. Activity #3: The Last Word
4. Form a group of four.
5. In your group, share your significant sentences.
6. Discuss why you have chosen your sentences,
and then decide as a group, which two sentences
are the most significant and be able to explain
your reasoning. Record them on separate sticky
notes.
7. Send one group member up to post your
sentences on the class t-chart.
18
20. Activity #4: Counter-Argument
Should Tablets Replace Textbooks in K-12 Schools?
1. Decide which side of the debate you support.
2. Form a group with others who take your side.
20
21. Activity #4: Counter-Argument
3. Now, you will discuss the OPPOSITE side of the
debate.
4. Individually, write as many sentences as you can
that support the OPPOSITE side of the argument.
21
22. Activity #4: Counter-Argument
5. Find a partner from the other group.
6. Share your sentences with your partner.
7. Complete your graphic organizers, and indicate
where you need to add details, statistics, and
examples to bolster your argument.
22
23. 23
Claim: State your position in relation to the
topic. ______________should/should not _________________.
(e.g.: tablets should replace textbooks in schools; the drinking age should not be lowered.)
Data/Evidence:
Support your claim with a fact, statistic,
quote, percentage, etc. & cite where that
information came from.
One reason to (claim) is because (argument). For example, (evidence).
Another reason to (claim) is because (argument).
Warrant: Explain why or how the
evidence/data supports your claim. Typically
2-3 sentences in length.
For instance, (evidence).
Counterargument:
State a logical counterclaim. Use language to
show this is a conflicting viewpoint (i.e.
although, even though, despite, however, in
contrast, etc.)
In contrast, (argument against your claim.)
Rebuttal: Present data and analysis to
discredit or prove the counterclaim is weak.
Typically 2-3 sentences in length.
However, (evidence to dismiss counter-argument)
Conclusion statement In conclusion, ______.
We need to ________ because _______.
Argument Paragraph Planning Template
24. References
• Gibbons, P. (2009). English learners academic literacies
and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Gimble, Claire and Bradinova, Marietta, Virginia
International University, VA. Presentation at TESOL
2015 in Toronto, CA.
• Williams, Stathis, and Gotsch, “Speaking of Writing,”
2009, Language Magazine pg. 21
24
25. Thank you!
Did we meet our objectives?
We will follow up with a brief
e-mail survey.
25